XML 57 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Intangible Assets and Goodwill

6.  Intangible Assets and Goodwill

The following table provides the components of the Company’s intangible assets (in thousands):

 

 

Initial Weighted

Average

Amortization

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

Period

(in years)

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net Balance

 

 

Initial Cost

 

 

Accumulated Amortization

 

 

Net Balance

 

Franchise agreements

 

12.0

 

 

$

162,835

 

 

$

(83,938

)

 

$

78,897

 

 

$

162,835

 

 

$

(73,764

)

 

$

89,071

 

Other intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Software

 

4.2

 

 

$

7,500

 

 

$

(7,014

)

 

$

486

 

 

$

7,463

 

 

$

(6,633

)

 

$

830

 

Trademarks

 

14.8

 

 

 

2,870

 

 

 

(1,380

)

 

 

1,490

 

 

 

2,935

 

 

 

(1,279

)

 

 

1,656

 

Total other intangible assets

7.1

 

 

$

10,370

 

 

$

(8,394

)

 

$

1,976

 

 

$

10,398

 

 

$

(7,912

)

 

$

2,486

 

 

Amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $3,518,000 and $3,141,000, respectively. Amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $10,656,000 and $9,431,000, respectively.

The estimated future amortization of intangible assets, other than goodwill, is as follows (in thousands):

 

Year ending December 31:

 

 

 

Remainder of 2014

$

3,548

 

2015

 

14,034

 

2016

 

13,794

 

2017

 

9,879

 

2018

 

6,264

 

Thereafter

 

33,354

 

 

$

80,873

 

  

The Company performs its annual impairment analysis of goodwill as of August 31 each year or more often if there are indicators of impairment present. The Company tests each reporting unit for goodwill impairment. Reporting units are driven by the level at which management reviews operating results and are one level below the operating segment.  The Company’s impairment assessment begins with a qualitative assessment to determine if it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than the carrying amount.  The initial qualitative assessment includes comparing the overall financial performance of the reporting units against the planned results as well as other factors which might indicate that the reporting unit’s value has declined since the last assessment date.  If it is determined in the qualitative assessment that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then the standard two-step quantitative impairment test is performed.  The first step of the quantitative impairment test consists of comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then it is not considered impaired and no further analysis is required. If the first step of the quantitative impairment test indicates that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then impairment potentially exists and the second step of the quantitative impairment test is performed to measure the amount of goodwill impairment. Goodwill impairment exists when the estimated implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying value.

The Company performed the qualitative impairment assessment for all of its reporting units by evaluating, among other things, market and general economic conditions, entity-specific events, events affecting a reporting unit and the Company’s results of operations and key performance measures. The results of the qualitative assessment determined it is not more likely than not that the carrying values of any of the Company’s reporting units exceed their respective fair values. As the fair values of the Company’s reporting units significantly exceed their respective carrying values, the Company did not perform the quantitative test, and no indicators of impairment existed.

Amounts recorded as goodwill in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are attributable to the Company’s Real Estate Franchise Services reportable segment. The following table presents changes to goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands):

 

Balance, January 1, 2014

$

72,781

 

Effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates

 

(165

)

Balance, September 30, 2014

$

72,616