XML 99 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

13.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are as follows:

 

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Estimated

 

 

Carrying

 

 

Estimated

 

 

Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

Cash and cash equivalents (a)

$

112,835

 

 

$

112,835

 

 

$

10,531

 

 

$

10,531

 

Receivables held for sale (b)

 

171,466

 

 

 

176,425

 

 

 

82,503

 

 

 

83,344

 

Retail installment contracts held for investment, net (c)

 

21,087,173

 

 

 

21,644,945

 

 

 

20,219,609

 

 

 

21,465,236

 

Unsecured consumer loans, net (d)

 

1,000,545

 

 

 

1,071,108

 

 

 

954,189

 

 

 

1,187,286

 

Receivables from dealers held for investment (e)

 

108,200

 

 

 

108,200

 

 

 

94,745

 

 

 

94,745

 

Restricted cash (a)

 

1,830,392

 

 

 

1,830,392

 

 

 

1,563,613

 

 

 

1,563,613

 

Notes payable — credit facilities (f)

 

9,573,726

 

 

 

9,573,726

 

 

 

8,099,773

 

 

 

8,099,773

 

Notes payable — secured structured financings (g)

 

15,783,587

 

 

 

15,924,794

 

 

 

15,195,887

 

 

 

15,565,013

 

(a)

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash — The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, approximated fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, due to the short maturity of these instruments and is considered a Level 1 measurement.

(b)

Receivables held for sale — Receivables held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market, as determined on an aggregate basis. The estimated fair value is based on the prices obtained or expected to be obtained in the subsequent sales and is considered a Level 1 measurement.

(c)

Retail installment contracts held for investment — Retail installment contracts are carried at amortized cost, net of loan loss allowance. The estimated fair value is calculated based on estimated market rates for similar contracts with similar credit risks and is considered a Level 3 measurement.

(d)

Unsecured consumer loans, net — Unsecured consumer loans are carried at amortized cost, net of loan loss allowance. Carrying value approximates fair value for unsecured revolving loans because the loans are short term in duration, do not have a defined maturity date and/or are at a market-based interest rate. For unsecured amortizing loans, the estimated fair value is calculated based on estimated market rates for similar loans with similar credit risks and is considered a level 3 measurement.

(e)

Receivables from dealers held for investment — Receivables from dealers held for investment are carried at amortized cost, net of loan loss allowance. The estimated fair value is calculated based on estimated market rates for similar receivables with similar credit risks and is considered a Level 3 measurement.

(f)

Notes payable — credit facilities — The carrying amount of notes payable related to revolving credit facilities is estimated to approximate fair value as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Management believes that the terms of these credit agreements approximate market terms for similar credit agreements. The fair value of notes payable is considered a Level 3 measurement.

(g)

Notes payable — secured structured financings — The estimated fair value of notes payable related to secured structured financings is calculated based on market quotes for the Company’s publicly traded debt and estimated market rates currently available from recent transactions involving similar debt with similar credit risks, and is considered a Level 2 measurement.

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy includes three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine the fair value:

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Assets — trading interest rate caps (a)

$

43,599

 

 

$

 

 

$

43,599

 

 

$

 

Assets — cash flow hedging interest rate swaps (a)

$

2,497

 

 

$

 

 

$

2,497

 

 

$

 

Assets — trading interest rate swaps (a)

$

570

 

 

$

 

 

$

570

 

 

$

 

Liabilities — trading options for interest rate
caps (a)

$

43,680

 

 

$

 

 

$

43,680

 

 

$

 

Liabilities — cash flow hedging interest rate
swaps (a)

$

4,727

 

 

$

 

 

$

4,727

 

 

$

 

Liabilities — trading interest rate swaps (a)

$

26,775

 

 

$

 

 

$

26,775

 

 

$

 

Total return swap (b)

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Assets — trading interest rate caps (a)

$

28,274

 

 

$

 

 

$

28,274

 

 

$

 

Assets — cash flow hedging interest rate swaps (a)

$

1,601

 

 

$

 

 

$

1,601

 

 

$

 

Liabilities — trading options for interest rate
caps (a)

$

28,389

 

 

$

 

 

$

28,389

 

 

$

 

Liabilities — cash flow hedging interest rate
swaps (a)

$

7,287

 

 

$

 

 

$

7,287

 

 

$

 

Liabilities — trading interest rate swaps (a)

$

31,360

 

 

$

 

 

$

31,360

 

 

$

 

(a)

The valuation of swaps and caps is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivative, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurement of its derivatives. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings and guarantees. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company made an election to use the exception in ASC 820-10-35-18D (commonly referred to as the “portfolio exception”) with respect to measuring counterparty credit risk for instruments (Note 7).

 

(b)

The total return swap is valued based on the estimated market value of the underlying bonds pledged to the associated credit facility.

No amounts were transferred in or out of Level 3 during 2014 or 2013.

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Assets — repossessed vehicle inventory

$

137,648

 

 

$

 

 

$

137,648

 

 

$

 

TDRs that have subsequently defaulted (Note 3)

$

49,502

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

49,502

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted Prices

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in Active

 

 

Other

 

 

Significant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Markets for

 

 

Observable

 

 

Unobservable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Identical Assets

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Inputs

 

 

Total

 

 

(Level 1)

 

 

(Level 2)

 

 

(Level 3)

 

Assets — repossessed vehicle inventory

$

129,323

 

 

$

 

 

$

129,323

 

 

$

 

TDRs that have subsequently defaulted (Note 3)

$

40,619

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

40,619

 

 

The Company estimates the fair value of its repossessed vehicle inventory using historical auction rates and current market levels of used car prices. TDRs that have subsequently defaulted but are currently active are written down to estimated collateral value less cost to sell.