XML 30 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.2
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Oct. 31, 2021
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Commitments and Contingencies
Noncancelable Purchase Commitments
The Company entered into a noncancelable arrangement with a web-hosting services provider in November 2019. Under the arrangement, the Company committed to spend an aggregate of at least $30.0 million between November 2019 and November 2022, with a minimum amount of $10.0 million in each of the three years, on services with this vendor. The Company has incurred costs totaling $3.4 million and $3.5 million during the three months ended October 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $6.6 million and $6.1 million during the six months ended October 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, under the arrangement.
C3.ai Digital Transformation Institute Grants
In February 2020, the Company entered into an agreement establishing the C3.ai Digital Transformation Institute (“C3.ai DTI”), a program established to attract many of the world’s leading research institutions to join in a coordinated and innovative effort to advance the digital transformation of business, government, and society. As part of the agreement, the Company has agreed to issue grants to C3.ai DTI, which are subject to compliance with certain obligations. The grants shall be paid by the Company over five years in the form of cash, publicly traded securities, or other property of equivalent net value. As of October 31, 2021 and April 30, 2021, the total potential remaining contributions are $37.4 million and $43.1 million, respectively. The future grant payments are conditional in nature and subject to execution of the program in line with specific requirements.
Leases
On August 25, 2021, the Company entered into a new lease to acquire approximately 283,015 square feet of office space in several phases in Redwood City, California. The lease is expected to commence in January 2022, when the landlord is expected to deliver the first two phases of leased space to the Company. Total undiscounted base rent payments over the term of this lease are approximately $103.1 million. In addition to base rent, the Company will be responsible for the Company’s allocated share of costs incurred and expenditures made by the landlord in the operation and management of the leased space. Under the terms of the lease agreement, the Company has a rent abatement with respect to each phase for the initial six months following the rent commencement date for such phase, with initial monthly base rent payments expected to commence April 1, 2023, which will be approximately $0.5 million at commencement and will increase up to a maximum monthly base rent of
approximately $1.0 million. The lease agreement also includes an aggregate tenant improvement allowance of $44.2 million for certain costs. The term of the lease is 126 months from the date that rent commences with respect to phase one of the leased space, which will be nine months after the date when phase one of the leased space is delivered to the Company. Pursuant to the lease agreement, the Company provided the landlord an unconditional and irrevocable letter of credit of $12.6 million, which is subject to reduction pursuant to the terms of the lease agreement. The commencement date for the first two phases of this lease is determined to be in the third quarter of fiscal 2022, therefore the lease is not included in the Company’s operating lease right-of-use asset or operating lease liabilities as of October 31, 2021.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings and periodically receives claims arising in the ordinary course of business. In the Company’s opinion, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on its condensed consolidated statement of operations, cash flows, or balance sheet.
Blattman et al. v. Siebel et al., 15-cv-00530 (D. Del.)
On October 28, 2014, Eric Blattman and other former unitholders of E2.0 LLC (“E2.0”) filed suit in federal court against Thomas M. Siebel and David Schmaier, alleging violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and common law fraud based on alleged misrepresentations made during negotiations leading up to an April 30, 2012 merger between E2.0 and the Company. Plaintiffs thereafter amended their complaint to add the Company as a defendant, and to add breach of contract claims based on alleged violations of certain earn-out and indemnification provisions in the parties’ merger agreement. A bench trial was held in February 2019, and in a January 29, 2020 opinion the court ruled in favor of defendants the Company, Siebel and Schmaier on all claims. The court also awarded defendants their reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in defending the action.
In February 2020, plaintiffs appealed only the portion of the district court’s ruling related to the alleged breach of contract indemnification claim to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. On February 17, 2021, the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment and orders of the district court in the Company’s and defendants’ favor. On August 10, 2021, the special master appointed by the district court to consider an order on recovery of fees and costs issued a recommendation that the Company be awarded $9.7 million in fees and expenses. Plaintiffs have objected to the special master’s recommendation and requested an award of $8.3 million, which the Company has opposed. The district court will now consider the special master’s recommendation and plaintiffs objection and the Company’s opposition and issue an order on fees and costs. The Company intends to continue to pursue recovery of attorney’s fees and costs as previously awarded by the district court.