XML 121 R30.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Summary of Signficant Accounting Policies (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Principles of Consolidation & Reclassifications Principles of Consolidation & Reclassifications
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the accounts of BioTelemetry and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period statements to conform to the current period presentation. These consist of:
combining our non-cash depreciation and amortization expense into one line on our consolidated statements of cash flows;
separating the non-cash operating item of change in fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration from other non-cash items on our consolidated statements of cash flows; and
combining our contract liabilities into accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
The reclassifications had no impact on previously reported working capital, consolidated results of operations, cash flows from operating, financing and investing activities, or accumulated deficit.
Use of Estimates Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the exit price, the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, as defined below. Observable inputs are inputs a market participant would use in valuing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our own assumptions about the factors a market participant would use in valuing an asset or liability developed using the best information available in the circumstances. The classification of an asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Level 1 -
Quoted prices in active markets for an identical asset or liability.
Level 2 -
Inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 -
Inputs that are unobservable for the asset or liability, based on our own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.
Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, Healthcare accounts receivable, other accounts receivable, accounts payable, acquisition-related contingent consideration, short-term debt and long-term debt. With the exception of acquisition-related contingent consideration and long-term debt, the carrying value of these financial instruments approximates their fair value because of their short-term nature (classified as Level 1).
Our long-term debt (classified as Level 2) is measured using market prices for similar instruments, inputs such as the borrowing rates currently available, benchmark yields, actual trade data, broker/dealer quotes and other similar data obtained from quoted market prices or independent pricing vendors.
The fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration (classified as Level 3) is measured on a recurring basis using a Monte Carlo simulation. This model uses assumptions, including estimated projected revenues, estimated stock price volatility in future periods, estimated discount rates and discounts for the lack of marketability of common stock. In addition to the recurring fair value measurements, the fair value of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with a business combination are recorded at fair value, primarily using a discounted cash flow model (classified as Level 3). This valuation technique requires us to make certain assumptions, including future operating performance, cash flows and revenue growth rates, royalty rates and other such variables, which are discounted to present value using a discount rate that reflects the risk factors associated with future cash flow, the characteristics of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the experience of the acquired business. Non-financial assets such as
goodwill, intangible assets, property and equipment and right-of-use (“ROU”) assets are subsequently measured at fair value when there is an indicator of impairment and recorded at fair value only when an impairment is recognized. We assess the impairment of goodwill and intangible assets annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an intangible asset may not be recoverable.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and Cash EquivalentsCash and cash equivalents are held in financial institutions or in custodial accounts with financial institutions. Cash equivalents are defined as liquid investments and money market funds with maturity from date of purchase of 90 days or less that are readily convertible into cash and have minimal interest rate risk.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Healthcare accounts receivable, including contract assets, is recorded at the time Healthcare segment revenue is recognized and is presented on the consolidated balance sheet net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. For our contracted payors, we determine revenue based on negotiated prices for the services provided. Based on our history, we have experience collecting substantially all of the negotiated contracted rates and are therefore not providing an implicit price concession. As a result, an allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded based on historical collection trends to account for the risk of patient default. Because of continuing changes in the healthcare industry and third-party reimbursement, it is possible that our estimates of collectability could change, which could have a material impact on our operations and cash flows.
Other accounts receivable is related to the Research segment and Corporate and Other category and is recorded at the time revenue is recognized, when products are shipped or services are performed.
We write off receivables when the likelihood for collection is remote, when we believe collection efforts have been fully exhausted and we do not intend to devote additional resources in attempting to collect. We perform write-offs on a monthly basis.
Inventory Inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost (using first-in, first-out cost method) or market (net realizable value or replacement cost). Management reviews inventory for specific future usage, and estimates of impairment of individual inventory items are recorded to reduce inventory to the lower of cost or market.
Property and Equipment Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is recorded at cost, except for assets acquired in business combinations, which are recorded at fair value as of the acquisition date. Depreciation is recorded over the estimated useful life of each class of depreciable assets, and is computed using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements and assets acquired under a finance lease are amortized over the shorter of the estimated asset life or term of the lease and included in depreciation expense. Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of additions and improvements are capitalized.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The carrying value of long-lived assets, other than goodwill, is evaluated when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. We consider historical performance and anticipated future results in our evaluation of potential impairment. Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of these assets in relation to the operating performance of the business and the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of these assets. If the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its expected undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds its fair value.
Equity Method Investments Equity Method Investments
We account for investments using the equity method of accounting if the investment provides us the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the investee. Significant influence is
generally deemed to exist if our ownership interest in the voting stock of the investee ranges between 20% and 50%, although other factors, such as representation on the investee’s board of directors, are considered in determining whether the equity method of accounting is appropriate. Under the equity method of accounting, the investment is recorded at cost in the consolidated balance sheets under other assets and is periodically adjusted for capital contributions, dividends received and our share of the investee’s earnings or losses together with other-than-temporary impairments which are recorded through loss on equity method investment in the consolidated statements of operations.
Noncontrolling Interests Noncontrolling Interests
The consolidated financial statements reflect the application of ASC 810 - Consolidations, which establishes accounting and reporting standards that require: (i) the ownership interest in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent to be clearly identified and presented in the consolidated balance sheet within stockholder’s equity, but separate from the parent’s equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net income/(loss) attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statements of operations; and (iii) changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary to be accounted for consistently.
Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price of an acquired business over the amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. In accordance with ASC 350 - Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (“ASC 350”), goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually, or when events arise that could indicate that an impairment exists. In order to test goodwill for impairment, ASC 350 allows reporting entities to take either a qualitative or quantitative approach to testing. Under the qualitative approach, an entity may assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Such qualitative factors can include, among others, industry and market conditions, present and anticipated sales and cost factors, overall financial performance and relevant entity-specific events. If we conclude based on our qualitative assessment that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, we perform a quantitative analysis in accordance with ASC 350. Under the quantitative approach, an entity compares the fair value of its reporting units to their carrying value. If the reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss equal to the difference is recognized. The loss recognized shall not exceed
the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit, and the income tax effects from any deductible goodwill on the carrying value of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if any, are considered.
For the purpose of performing our goodwill impairment analysis, we consider our business to be composed of three reporting units: Healthcare, Research and Technology. When performing a quantitative analysis, we calculate the fair value of the reporting units utilizing the income and market approaches. The income approach is based on a discounted cash flow methodology that includes assumptions for, among other things, forecasted income, cash flow, growth rates, income tax rates, expected tax benefits and long-term discount rates, all of which require significant judgment. The market approach utilizes our market data as well as market data from publicly-traded companies that are similar to us. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and the judgment applied in the analysis. We believe that the income and market approaches provide a reasonable basis to estimate the fair value of our reporting units.
Acquired intangible assets are recorded at fair value on the acquisition date. The estimated fair values and useful lives of intangible assets are determined by assessing many factors including estimates of future operating performance and cash flows of the acquired business, the characteristics of the intangible assets and the experience of the acquired business. Independent appraisal firms may assist with the valuation of acquired assets. The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets other than goodwill consists of a comparison of the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset to the carrying value of the asset.
Revenue from Contract with Customer Revenue Recognition
We adopted ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) on January 1, 2018, which requires revenue recognized to represent the transfer of promised goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration that a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
We utilized the modified retrospective method for adoption, allowing us to not retrospectively adjust prior periods. We applied the modified retrospective method only to contracts that were not complete at January 1, 2018 and accounted for the aggregate effect of any contract modifications upon adoption. No cumulative adjustment to retained earnings was recorded.
Healthcare
Healthcare segment revenue includes revenue from MCT, event, traditional Holter, extended Holter, Pacemaker, INR and ILR monitoring services. A significant portion of our revenue is paid for by third-party commercial insurance organizations and governmental entities. We also receive reimbursement directly from patients through co-pays, deductibles and self-pay arrangements.
For contracted payors, including Medicare, we determine revenue based on negotiated prices for the services provided. Based on our history, we have experience collecting substantially all of the negotiated contracted rates and are therefore not providing an implicit price concession. As a result, any adjustments to the revenue recognized are due to patient default and are recorded as bad debt expense.
For non-contracted payors, we are providing an implicit price concession because we do not have a contract with the underlying payor. As a result, we estimate our expected revenue based on historical cash collections. Subsequent adjustments to the revenue recognized are recorded as an adjustment to Healthcare revenue and not as bad debt expense.
Research
Research segment revenue includes revenue for centralized core laboratory services. Our Research segment revenue is provided on a fee-for-service basis, and revenue is recognized as the related services are performed. We also provide consulting services on a time and materials basis, and this revenue is recognized as the services are performed. Our site support revenue, consisting of equipment rentals along with logistics management, are recognized at the time of service or over the rental period. Our research customer contracts have legally enforceable terms that are predominately thirty days due to termination for convenience clauses, which are held by the customer with no significant penalty. Given the short-term nature of these contracts and the structure of our billing practices, our billing practices approximate our performance if measured by an output method, where each output is an individual occurrence of each performance obligation. Accordingly, we utilize the invoice practical expedient as defined in ASC 606, resulting in recognition of revenue in the amount that we have the right to invoice. We record reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses, including freight, as revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Other
Other revenue is primarily derived from the sale of non-invasive cardiac monitors to healthcare companies, wireless blood glucose meters and test strips to wholesale distributors of diabetes supplies and employer health plans, as well as product repairs. Performance obligations are primarily the sale of devices, related goods and repairs provided by us. These contracts transfer control to a customer at a point in time based on the transfer of title for the underlying goods or service.
Revenue is recognized net of any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to government authorities.
Share-Based Compensation Stock-Based Compensation
ASC 718 - Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for: (i) equity instruments of the enterprise or (ii) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. ASC 718 requires that an entity measure the cost of equity-based service awards issued to employees, such as stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”), based on the grant-date fair value of the award and recognize the cost of such awards over the requisite service period (generally, the vesting period of the award). The compensation expense associated with performance stock units (“PSUs”) is recognized ratably over the period between when the performance conditions are deemed probable of achievement and when the awards are vested.
Performance stock options (“PSOs”) are valued and stock-based compensation expense is recorded once the performance conditions of the outstanding PSOs have achieved probability. Prior to our July 1, 2018 adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, we accounted for equity awards issued to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.
We have historically recorded stock-based compensation expense based on the number of stock options or stock units we expect to vest using our historical forfeiture experience and we periodically update those forfeiture rates to apply to new grants. We estimate forfeitures under the true-up provision of ASC 718. We record additional expense if the actual forfeiture rate is lower than estimated and record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture rate is higher than estimated.
We estimate the fair value of our stock options using the Black‑Scholes option valuation model. The Black‑Scholes option valuation model requires the use of certain subjective assumptions. The most significant of these assumptions are the estimates of the expected volatility of the market price of our stock and the expected term of the award. We base our estimates of expected volatility on the historical average of our stock price. The expected term represents the period of time that share‑based awards granted are expected to be outstanding. Other assumptions used in the Black‑Scholes option valuation model include the risk‑free interest rate and expected dividend yield. The risk‑free interest rate for periods pertaining to the expected term of each option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield of a similar duration in effect at the time of grant. We have never paid, and do not expect to pay, dividends in the foreseeable future.
We estimate the fair value of our PSUs using a Monte Carlo simulation. This model uses assumptions, including the risk free interest rate, expected volatility of our stock price and those of the performance group, dividends of the performance group members and expected life of the awards. As noted above, we continue to estimate forfeitures under the true-up provision of ASC 718. If it is deemed probable that the PSU performance targets will be met, compensation expense is recorded for these awards ratably over the requisite service period. The PSUs are forfeited to the extent the performance criteria are not met within the service period.
Research and Development Costs Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Income Taxes Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the liability method, as described in ASC 740 - Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and financial statement reporting bases of assets and liabilities. When we determine that we will not be able to realize our deferred tax assets, we adjust the carrying value of the deferred tax assets through the valuation allowance.
We record unrecognized tax benefits in accordance with ASC 740 on the basis of a two-step process in which (i) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (ii) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.
Net Income/(Loss) Per Share Net Income/(Loss) Per Share
We compute net income/(loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260 - Earnings Per Share. Basic net income/(loss) per share is computed by dividing net income/(loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by giving effect to all potential dilutive common stock equivalents, including stock options, RSUs, PSOs and PSUs, using the treasury stock method and shares expected to be issued in connection with acquisition-related contingent consideration arrangements when dilutive. Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents are not included in the weighted-average shares outstanding for determining net loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2017, as the result would be anti-dilutive.
Certain stock options, which are priced higher than the market price of our shares as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 would be anti-dilutive and therefore have been excluded from the weighted average
shares used in computing diluted net income per share. These options could become dilutive in future periods. Similarly, certain recently granted RSUs and PSUs are also excluded using the treasury stock method as their impact would be anti-dilutive.
Segment Information Segment Information
ASC 280 - Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual consolidated financial statements. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance.
We report our business under two segments: Healthcare and Research. The Healthcare segment is focused on remote cardiac monitoring to identify arrhythmias or heart rhythm disorders and to monitor the functionality of implantable cardiac devices. We offer cardiologists, electrophysiologists, neurologists and primary care physicians a full spectrum of solutions, which provides them with a single source of remote cardiac monitoring services. The Research segment is engaged in centralized core laboratory services providing cardiac monitoring, imaging services, scientific consulting and data management services for drug and medical device trials. During the first quarter of 2018, as part of the LifeWatch integration, our forward-looking integration and rebranding plans, as well as re-evaluating the significance and materiality of our segments, we aggregated the Technology operating segment into the Corporate and Other category. Included in the Corporate and Other category is the manufacturing, testing and marketing of cardiac and blood glucose monitoring devices to medical companies, clinics and hospitals and corporate overhead and other items not allocated to any of our reportable segments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, to align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The updated guidance also requires an entity to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. Historically, our implementation costs incurred in hosting service contracts have not been material. We early adopted this standard effective April 1, 2019 on a prospective basis. Upon adoption, our eligible cloud computing implementation costs are capitalized and recorded as a component of technology within intangible assets in our consolidated balance sheet and amortized to selling, general and administrative costs over the life of the service arrangement on our consolidated statement of operations. This update did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
In August 2018, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted the final rule under SEC Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, amending certain disclosure requirements that were redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated or superseded. Additionally, the amendments expanded the disclosure requirements on the consolidated statements of equity for interim consolidated financial statements. Under the amendments, a summary of changes in each caption of
stockholders’ equity presented in the consolidated balance sheets must be provided in a note or separate statement. The consolidated statements of equity should present a reconciliation of the beginning balance to the ending balance of each period for which the consolidated statement of comprehensive income is required to be filed. This final rule was effective in the fourth quarter of 2018. The SEC provided relief on the effective date until the first quarter of 2019, and we adopted this rule in the first quarter of 2019.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This standard, along with several subsequent updates, requires lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheet, make selected changes to lessor accounting and disclose additional key information about leases. We adopted these updates on January 1, 2019, using the optional modified retrospective transition method and utilizing practical expedients available. The adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording, as of January 1, 2019, of additional ROU assets of $22.7 million as a component of other assets, current ROU liabilities of $6.2 million as a component of accrued liabilities and long-term ROU liabilities of $16.5 million, all of which relate to our operating leases. The adoption of the new standard did not materially impact our consolidated results of operations and had no impact on our cash flows.
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”). This update eliminates certain exceptions related to the approach for intra-period tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The update also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. Additionally, ASU 2019-12 clarifies that single-member limited liability companies and similar disregarded entities that are not subject to income tax are not required to recognize an allocation of consolidated income tax expense in their separate financial statements, but they can elect to do so. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (“ASU 2018-13”). This update eliminates certain disclosures related to transfers and valuation processes, clarifies the requirement for measurement uncertainty disclosures, and requires additional disclosures for Level 3 fair value measurements, including the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We will adopt this update on January 1, 2020, and this update will not impact our consolidated financial statements; however the update is expected to result in additional disclosures.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses. This update, along with subsequent amendments, introduces the current expected credit loss model, which will require an entity to measure credit losses for certain financial instruments and financial assets, including trade receivables. Under this update, upon initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity will be required to recognize an allowance that reflects the entity’s current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial instrument. This update will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those fiscal years, and a modified retrospective approach
is required, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. We are currently in process of adopting this update as of January 1, 2020, and we currently do not anticipate that the adoption will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.