XML 48 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Disclosures
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures  
Fair Value Disclosures

9.              Fair Value Disclosures

 

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements (“ASC 820”), as updated and amended by Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, provides a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities under GAAP and establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy can be summarized as follows:

 

Level 1:    Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

 

Level 2:    Fair value determined based on using significant observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data, by correlation or other means.

 

Level 3:    Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as pricing models, discounted cash flows or similar techniques.  The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

 

The carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial liabilities are summarized in the table below, except for those liabilities for which the carrying values approximate their fair values.

 

 

 

March 31, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

Carrying

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Value

 

Fair Value

 

Value

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Notes due 2021

 

$

200,000

 

$

207,500

 

$

200,000

 

$

199,000

 

Community development district obligations

 

6,871

 

8,113

 

7,271

 

8,447

 

 

The estimated fair values of our debt and community development district obligations were derived from quoted market prices by independent dealers (Level 2).

 

There were no financial instruments—assets or liabilities—measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

 

The majority of our nonfinancial assets, which include real estate inventories, property and equipment and goodwill, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  However, if certain events occur, such that a nonfinancial asset is required to be evaluated for impairment, the resulting effect would be to record the nonfinancial asset at the lower of cost or fair value.

 

The Company did not have any nonfinancial assets that were written down to fair value as the result of an impairment charge during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

The carrying amounts reported for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, notes and accounts receivable, other assets, income taxes receivable, accounts payable and other liabilities, and customer deposits were estimated to approximate their fair values.