XML 47 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
6 Months Ended
Jan. 31, 2015
Earnings (Loss) Per Share [Abstract]  
Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Note 4—Earnings (Loss) Per Share

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to all classes of common stockholders of the Company by the weighted average number of shares of all classes of common stock outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted earnings per share is computed in the same manner as basic earnings per share, except that the number of shares is increased to include restricted stock still subject to risk of forfeiture and to assume exercise of potentially dilutive stock options using the treasury stock method, unless the effect of such increase would be anti-dilutive. The following table summarizes the components of the earnings (loss) per common share calculation:

 

  Three Months Ended 
January 31,
  Six Months Ended 
January 31,
 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
  (in thousands) 
Basic weighted-average number of shares  11,420   10,784   11,409   10,646 
Effect of dilutive securities:                
   Shares underlying stock options        7    
   Non-vested restricted Class B common stock        421    
                 
Diluted weighted-average number of shares  11,420   10,784   11,837   10,646 

 

The following shares were excluded from the diluted earnings (loss) per share computations because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive:

 

  Three Months Ended 
January 31,
  Six Months Ended 
January 31,
 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
  (in thousands) 
Stock options  7   30      30 
Non-vested restricted Class B common stock  409   474      474 
                 
Shares excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share  416   504      504 

  

For the three months ended January 31, 2015 and the three and six months ended January 31, 2014, the diluted loss per share equals basic loss per share because the Company had a net loss and the impact of the assumed exercise of stock options and assumed vesting of restricted stock would have been anti-dilutive.