Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Disclosure Text Block
Commitments and Contingencies	15. Commitments and Contingencies Litigation The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. When applicable, we record accruals for contingencies when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. While the outcome of lawsuits and other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, individually or in the aggregate, no such lawsuits are expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity. In an action filed on June 12, 2015 in the 31st District Court of Hemphill County, Texas, Donna Kim Flowers and Mitchell Kirk Flowers v. Jones Energy, LLC f/k/a Jones Energy Limited, LLC f/k/a Jones Energy, Ltd. (Case No. 7225), the Company was sued by Donna Kim Flowers and Mitchell Kirk Flowers (the “plaintiffs”). The plaintiffs own surface rights to property located in Hemphill County, Texas. The mineral rights are leased to third parties, and the Company is the operator of the Oil and Gas Mineral Lease. On May 28, 2010, the plaintiffs and the Company entered into a Surface Use Agreement concerning the Company’s operations on the property, which require the Company to minimize disruption and damage to the plaintiffs’ surface rights. The plaintiffs allege that the Company is in breach of such contract, and seek monetary damages. In June 2016, the Company presented a settlement offer to the plaintiffs. As a result of this settlement offer, the Company accrued $1.5 million related to its estimated obligation under this settlement offer. This accrual was included in accrued liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016, and the charge was recorded as general and administrative expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations during the second quarter of 2016. In June 2017, the Company presented a revised settlement offer to the plaintiffs and the plaintiff accepted. The settlement was paid in cash during June 2017. Upon settlement, the Company recognized an additional charge of $1.4 million which was recorded as general and administrative expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations during the second quarter of 2017.

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. When applicable, we record accruals for contingencies when it is probable that a liability will be incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. While the outcome of lawsuits and other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management, individually or in the aggregate, no such lawsuits are expected to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

In an action filed on June 12, 2015 in the 31st District Court of Hemphill County, Texas, Donna Kim Flowers and Mitchell Kirk Flowers v. Jones Energy, LLC f/k/a Jones Energy Limited, LLC f/k/a Jones Energy, Ltd. (Case No. 7225), the Company was sued by Donna Kim Flowers and Mitchell Kirk Flowers (the “plaintiffs”). The plaintiffs own surface rights to property located in Hemphill County, Texas. The mineral rights are leased to third parties, and the Company is the operator of the Oil and Gas Mineral Lease. On May 28, 2010, the plaintiffs and the Company entered into a Surface Use Agreement concerning the Company’s operations on the property, which require the Company to minimize disruption and damage to the plaintiffs’ surface rights. The plaintiffs allege that the Company is in breach of such contract, and seek monetary damages. In June 2016, the Company presented a settlement offer to the plaintiffs. As a result of this settlement offer, the Company accrued $1.5 million related to its estimated obligation under this settlement offer. This accrual was included in accrued liabilities on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016, and the charge was recorded as general and administrative expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations during the second quarter of 2016. In June 2017, the Company presented a revised settlement offer to the plaintiffs and the plaintiff accepted. The settlement was paid in cash during June 2017. Upon settlement, the Company recognized an additional charge of $1.4 million which was recorded as general and administrative expense on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations during the second quarter of 2017.