FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2023

The tables below present information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized to determine the fair values as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.

The Company has elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative contracts executed with the same counterparty; however, fair value amounts by hierarchy level are presented on a gross basis in the tables below. The Company has posted cash margin with various counterparties to support hedging and trading activities. The cash margin posted is required by counterparties as collateral deposits and cannot be offset against the fair value of open contracts except in the event of default. The Company has no derivative contracts that are subject to master netting arrangements that are reflected gross on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.


	As of September 30, 2023
	Fair Value Hierarchy						Total Gross Fair Value		Effect of Counter-party Netting	Net Carrying Value on Balance Sheet
(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	153.2	$	—	$	—	$	153.2	N/A	$	153.2

Commodity contracts	103.7		18.0		3.7		125.4		(122.0)	3.4


Liabilities:
Commodity contracts	110.5		11.5		—		122.0		(122.0)	—

Renewable energy credit and emissions obligations	—		453.6		—		453.6		—	453.6
Contingent consideration obligation	—		—		94.7		94.7		—	94.7


	As of December 31, 2022
	Fair Value Hierarchy						Total Gross Fair Value		Effect of Counter-party Netting	Net Carrying Value on Balance Sheet
(in millions)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	106.5	$	—	$	—	$	106.5	N/A	$	106.5

Commodity contracts	33.8		15.7		—		49.5		(35.6)	13.9
Derivatives included within inventory intermediation agreement obligations	—		25.1		—		25.1		—	25.1

Liabilities:
Commodity contracts	20.6		11.8		3.2		35.6		(35.6)	—
Catalyst obligations	—		4.0		—		4.0		—	4.0
Renewable energy credit and emissions obligations	—		1,361.1		—		1,361.1		—	1,361.1
Contingent consideration obligation	—		—		147.3		147.3		—	147.3

The valuation methods used to measure financial instruments at fair value are as follows:

•Money market funds categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted market prices and included within Cash and cash equivalents.

•The commodity contracts categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted prices in an active market. The commodity contracts categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon future commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.

•The derivatives included with inventory intermediation agreement obligations and the catalyst obligations are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.

•Renewable energy credit and emissions obligations primarily represent the Company’s liability for the purchase of (i) biofuel credits (primarily RINs in the U.S.) needed to satisfy its obligation to blend biofuels into the products the Company produces and (ii) emission credits under the AB 32 and similar programs (collectively, the cap-and-trade systems). To the degree the Company is unable to blend biofuels (such as ethanol and biodiesel) at percentages required under the biofuel programs, it must purchase biofuel credits to comply with these programs. Under the cap-and-trade systems, it must purchase emission credits to comply with these systems. The liability for environmental credits is in part based on the Company’s deficit for such credits as of the balance sheet date, if any, after considering any credits acquired, and is equal to the product of the credits deficit and the market price of these credits as of the balance sheet date. To the extent that the Company has a better estimate of the cost at which it settles its obligation, such as agreements to purchase RINs at prices other than the current spot price, the Company considers those costs in valuing the remaining obligation. The environmental credit obligations are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the Company measured at fair value using a market approach based on quoted prices from an independent pricing service.

•When applicable, commodity contracts categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy consist of commodity price swap contracts that relate to forecasted purchases of crude oil for which quoted forward market prices are not readily available due to market illiquidity. The forward prices used to value these swaps are derived using broker quotes, prices from other third-party sources and other available market based data.

•The contingent consideration obligation at September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 is categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and is estimated using discounted cash flow models based on management’s estimate of the future cash flows related to the earn-out periods.

Non-qualified pension plan assets are measured at fair value using a market approach based on published net asset values of mutual funds as a practical expedient. As of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, $18.4 million and $18.6 million, respectively, were included within Deferred charges and other assets, net for these non-qualified pension plan assets.

The table below summarizes the changes in fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, which primarily includes the change in estimated future earnings related to the Martinez Contingent Consideration:



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions)	2023		2022		2023		2022
Balance at beginning of period	$	17.5	$	157.1	$	150.5	$	29.4
Additions	—		—		—		—

Settlements	2.5		—		(81.1)		—
Unrealized loss included in earnings	71.0		3.0		21.6		130.7


Balance at end of period	$	91.0	$	160.1	$	91.0	$	160.1

There were no transfers between levels during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2023 or the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022.

Fair value of debt

The table below summarizes the carrying value and fair value of debt as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.


	September 30, 2023				December 31, 2022
(In millions)	Carrying value		Fair value		Carrying value		Fair value
2028 Senior Notes (a)	$	801.6	$	754.9	$	801.6	$	703.7
2030 Senior Notes (a)	500.0		500.7		—		—
2025 Senior Notes (a)	—		—		664.5		656.0




Catalyst financing arrangements (b)	—		—		4.0		4.0
	1,301.6		1,255.6		1,470.1		1,363.7

Unamortized discount	(3.3)		n/a		—		n/a
Less - Unamortized deferred financing costs	(55.3)		n/a		(35.2)		n/a
Long-term debt	$	1,243.0	$	1,255.6	$	1,434.9	$	1,363.7

(a)The estimated fair value, categorized as a Level 2 measurement, was calculated based on the present value of future expected payments utilizing implied current market interest rates based on quoted prices of the outstanding senior notes.

(b)Catalyst financing arrangements were valued using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets and were categorized as a Level 2 measurement. The Company elected the fair value option for accounting for its catalyst repurchase obligations as the Company’s liability was directly impacted by the change in fair value of the underlying catalyst.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details