XML 48 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The tables below present information about the Company's financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized to determine the fair values as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
We have elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative contracts executed with the same counterparty; however, fair value amounts by hierarchy level are presented on a gross basis in the tables below. We have posted cash margin with various counterparties to support hedging and trading activities. The cash margin posted is required by counterparties as collateral deposits and cannot be offset against the fair value of open contracts except in the event of default. We have no derivative contracts that are subject to master netting arrangements that are reflected gross on the balance sheet.
 
As of September 30, 2015
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Total Gross Fair Value
 
Effect of Counter-party Netting
 
Net Carrying Value on Balance Sheet
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
342,414

 
$

 
$

 
$
342,414

 
N/A

 
$
342,414

Non-qualified pension plan assets
9,441

 

 

 
9,441

 
N/A

 
9,441

Commodity contracts
148,907

 
10,710

 
838

 
160,455

 
(137,670
)
 
22,785

Derivatives included with intermediation agreement obligations

 
44,684

 

 
44,684

 

 
44,684

Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations

 
1,031

 

 
1,031

 

 
1,031

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
134,702

 
1,945

 
1,023

 
137,670

 
(137,670
)
 

Catalyst lease obligations

 
27,577

 

 
27,577

 

 
27,577


 
As of December 31, 2014
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Total Gross Fair Value
 
Effect of Counter-party Netting
 
Net Carrying Value on Balance Sheet
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
5,575

 
$

 
$

 
$
5,575

 
N/A

 
$
5,575

Non-qualified pension plan assets
5,494

 

 

 
5,494

 
N/A

 
5,494

Commodity contracts
415,023

 
12,093

 
1,715

 
428,831

 
(397,676
)
 
31,155

Derivatives included with inventory intermediation agreement obligations

 
94,834

 

 
94,834

 

 
94,834

Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligation

 
4,251

 

 
4,251

 

 
4,251

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts
390,144

 
7,338

 
194

 
397,676

 
(397,676
)
 

Catalyst lease obligations

 
36,559

 

 
36,559

 

 
36,559



The valuation methods used to measure financial instruments at fair value are as follows:
Money market funds categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted market prices and included within Cash and cash equivalents.
Non-qualified pension plan assets categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based on published net asset values of mutual funds and included within Deferred charges and other assets, net.
The commodity contracts categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted prices in an active market. The commodity contracts categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon future commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.
The commodity contracts categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy consist of commodity price swap contracts that relate to forecasted purchases of crude oil for which quoted forward market prices are not readily available due to market illiquidity. The forward prices used to value these swaps were derived using broker quotes, prices from other third party sources and other available market based data.
The derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations, derivatives included with inventory intermediation agreement obligations and the catalyst lease obligations are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.

The table below summarizes the changes in fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
2015
 
2014
 
2015
 
2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
1,905

 
$
2,689

 
$
1,521

 
$
(23,365
)
Purchases

 

 

 

Settlements
(1,238
)
 
(9,020
)
 
(12,549
)
 
(5,353
)
Unrealized gain included in earnings
(852
)
 
19,377

 
10,843

 
41,764

Transfers into Level 3

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3

 

 

 

Balance at end of period
$
(185
)
 
$
13,046

 
$
(185
)
 
$
13,046



There were no transfers between levels during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Fair value of debt
The table below summarizes the fair value and carrying value of debt as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
 
September 30, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Carrying
value
 
Fair
 value
 
Carrying
 value
 
Fair
value
Senior Secured Notes (a)
$
669,354

 
$
680,548

 
$
668,520

 
$
675,580

Revolving Loan (b)

 

 

 

Rail Facility (b)
67,491

 
67,491

 
37,270

 
37,270

Catalyst leases (c)
27,577

 
27,577

 
36,559

 
36,559

 
764,422

 
775,616

 
742,349

 
749,409

Less - Current maturities

 

 

 

Long-term debt
$
764,422

 
$
775,616

 
$
742,349

 
$
749,409


(a) The estimated fair value, categorized as a Level 2 measurement, was calculated based on the present value of future expected payments utilizing implied current market interest rates based on quoted prices of the Senior Secured Notes.
(b) The estimated fair value approximates carrying value, categorized as a Level 2 measurement, as these borrowings bear interest based upon short-term floating market interest rates.
(c) Catalyst leases are valued using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets and are categorized as a Level 2 measurement. The Company has elected the fair value option for accounting for its catalyst lease repurchase obligations as the Company's liability is directly impacted by the change in fair value of the underlying catalyst.