XML 56 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The tables below present information about the Company's financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized to determine the fair values as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
We have elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative contracts executed with the same counterparty; however, fair value amounts by hierarchy level are presented on a gross basis in the tables below. We have posted cash margin with various counterparties to support hedging and trading activities. The cash margin posted is required by counterparties as collateral deposits and cannot be offset against the fair value of open contracts except in the event of default. We have no derivative contracts that are subject to master netting arrangements that are reflected gross on the balance sheet.
 
As of June 30, 2014
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Total Gross Fair Value
 
Effect of Counter-party Netting
 
Net Carrying Value on Balance Sheet
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
5,546

 
$

 
$

 
$
5,546

 
N/A

 
$
5,546

Non-qualified pension plan assets
5,047

 

 

 
5,047

 
N/A

 
5,047

Commodity contracts
15,017

 
15,971

 
2,827

 
33,815

 
(12,628
)
 
21,187

Derivatives included with intermediation agreement obligations

 
15,059

 

 
15,059

 

 
15,059

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Catalyst lease obligations

 
57,429

 

 
57,429

 
N/A

 
57,429

Commodity contracts
220

 
12,845

 
138

 
13,203

 
(12,628
)
 
575

Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations

 
1,247

 

 
1,247

 

 
1,247

 
As of December 31, 2013
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market funds
$
5,857

 
$

 
$

 
$
5,857

Non-qualified pension plan assets
4,905

 

 

 
4,905

Commodity contracts
4,252

 
6,681

 

 
10,933

Derivatives included with inventory intermediation agreement obligations

 
6,016

 

 
6,016

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity contracts

 
6,989

 
23,365

 
30,354

Catalyst lease obligations

 
53,089

 

 
53,089

Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations

 
177

 

 
177



The valuation methods used to measure financial instruments at fair value are as follows:
Money market funds categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted market prices and included within cash and cash equivalents.
Non-qualified pension plan assets categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based on published net asset values of mutual funds and included within Deferred charges and other assets, net.
The commodity contracts categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted prices in an active market. The commodity contracts categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon future commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.
The commodity contracts categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy consist of commodity price swap contracts that relate to forecasted purchases of crude oil for which quoted forward market prices are not readily available due to market illiquidity. The forward price used to value these swaps was derived using broker quotes, prices from other third party sources and other available market based data.
The derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations, derivatives included with inventory intermediation agreement obligations and the catalyst lease obligations are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.

The table below summarizes the changes in fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Balance at beginning of period
$
(3,751
)
 
$
21,358

 
$
(23,365
)
 
$
21,358

Purchases

 

 

 

Settlements
4,972

 
(21,358
)
 
3,667

 
(21,358
)
Unrealized gain included in earnings
1,468

 

 
22,387

 

Transfers into Level 3

 

 

 

Transfers out of Level 3

 

 

 

Balance at end of period
$
2,689

 
$

 
$
2,689

 
$



There were no transfers between levels during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Fair value of debt
The table below summarizes the fair value and carrying value as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Carrying
value
 
Fair
 value
 
Carrying
 value
 
Fair
value
Senior secured notes (a)
$
667,992

 
$
671,936

 
$
667,487

 
$
697,568

Revolving Loan (b)

 

 
15,000

 
15,000

Rail Facility (b)
8,225

 
8,225

 

 

Catalyst leases (c)
57,429

 
57,429

 
53,089

 
53,089

 
733,646

 
737,590

 
735,576

 
765,657

Less - Current maturities
13,009

 
13,009

 
12,029

 
12,029

Long-term debt
$
720,637

 
$
724,581

 
$
723,547

 
$
753,628


(a) The estimated fair value, categorized as a Level 2 measurement, was calculated based on the present value of future expected payments utilizing implied current market interest rates based on quoted prices of the senior secured notes.
(b) The estimated fair value approximates carrying value, categorized as a Level 2 measurement, as these borrowings bear interest based upon short-term floating market interest rates.
(c) Catalyst leases are valued using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets and are categorized as a Level 2 measurement. The Company has elected the fair value option for accounting for its catalyst lease repurchase obligations as the Company's liability is directly impacted by the change in fair value of the underlying catalyst.