XML 31 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
12 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2017
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]  
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

NOTE 8. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The carrying values of the Company’s intangible assets and related accumulated amortization for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 were as follows:

 

     As of June 30,  
     2017      2016  
     (in millions)  

Intangible Assets Not Subject to Amortization

     

Newspaper mastheads

   $ 299      $ 307  

Distribution networks

     390        391  

Imprints

     237        245  

Radio broadcast licenses

     185        —    

Trademarks and tradenames

     179        191  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total intangible assets not subject to amortization

     1,290        1,134  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization

     

Channel distribution agreements(a)

     335        342  

Publishing rights(b)

     329        365  

Customer relationships(c)

     310        336  

Other(d)

     17        30  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total intangible assets subject to amortization, net

     991        1,073  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Intangible assets, net

   $ 2,281      $ 2,207  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(a) 

Net of accumulated amortization of $76 million and $58 million as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The average useful life of the channel distribution agreements is 25 years primarily based on the period that a majority of the future cash flows from these intangible assets will be generated.

(b) 

Net of accumulated amortization of $181 million and $150 million as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The useful lives of publishing rights range from 4 to 30 years primarily based on the weighted-average remaining contractual terms of the underlying publishing contracts and the Company’s estimates of the period within those terms that the asset is expected to generate a majority of its future cash flows.

(c) 

Net of accumulated amortization of $399 million and $363 million as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The useful lives of customer relationships range from 2 to 25 years. The useful lives of these assets are estimated by applying historical attrition rates and determining the resulting period over which a majority of the accumulated undiscounted cash flows related to the customer relationships are expected to be generated.

(d) 

Net of accumulated amortization of $83 million and $69 million as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The useful lives of other intangible assets range from 2 to 15 years. The useful lives represent the periods over which these intangible assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the Company’s future cash flows.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized impairment charges of $58 million related to trademarks and tradenames.

Amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets was $91 million, $91 million and $90 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Based on the current amount of amortizable intangible assets, the estimated amortization expense for each of the succeeding five fiscal years is as follows: 2018—$88 million; 2019—$75 million; 2020—$67 million; 2021— $62 million; and 2022—$57 million.

 

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill, by segment, are as follows:

 

     News and
Information
Services
    Book
Publishing
    Digital Real
Estate
Services
    Cable Network
Programming
    Other     Total
Goodwill
 
     (in millions)  

Balance, June 30, 2015

   $ 1,696     $ 241     $ 636     $ 486     $ 4     $ 3,063  

Acquisitions

     80       31       545       —         —         656  

Foreign currency movements

     (11     (12     28       (10     —         (5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2016

   $ 1,765     $ 260     $ 1,209     $ 476     $ 4     $ 3,714  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Acquisitions

     136       10       2       11       —         159  

Impairments(a)

     (20     —         (24     —         (4     (48

Dispositions(b)

     —         —         (20     —         —         (20

Foreign currency movements

     3       1       16       13       —         33  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance, June 30, 2017

   $ 1,884     $ 271     $ 1,183     $ 500     $  —       $ 3,838  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) 

In the News and Information Services segment, the write-down of goodwill primarily relates to a reporting unit in the U.K.. In the Digital Real Estate Services segment, the write-down of goodwill relates to the Company’s DIAKRIT reporting unit.

(b) 

Relates to REA Group’s sale of its European business.

The carrying amount of goodwill as of June 30, 2017 reflected accumulated impairments, principally relating to the News and Information Services segment, of $3.5 billion.

Annual Impairment Assessments

Fiscal 2017

In accordance with ASC 350, the Company’s goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested annually in the fourth quarter for impairment or earlier if events or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. (See Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies).

The performance of the Company’s annual impairment analysis resulted in impairments of $88 million of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in fiscal 2017. Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the income approach valuation method were discount rates (ranging from 9.0%-25.0%), long-term growth rates (ranging from 0.0%-3.3%) and royalty rates (ranging from 0.5%-7.5%). Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the market approach valuation method were EBITDA multiples from guideline public companies operating in similar industries and control premiums (ranging from 10%-15%). Significant increases (decreases) in royalty rates, growth rates, control premiums and multiples, assuming no change in discount rates, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Significant decreases (increases) in discount rates, assuming no changes in royalty rates, growth rates, control premiums and multiples, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

Fiscal 2016

The performance of the Company’s annual impairment analysis did not result in any impairments of goodwill in fiscal 2016. Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the income approach valuation method were discount rates (ranging from 9%-14.5%), long-term growth rates (ranging from 0%-3.5%) and royalty rates (ranging from 0.5%-3.4%). Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the market approach valuation method were EBITDA multiples from guideline public companies operating in similar industries and control premiums (ranging from 10%-15%). Significant increases (decreases) in royalty rates, growth rates, control premiums and multiples, assuming no change in discount rates, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Significant decreases (increases) in discount rates, assuming no changes in royalty rates, growth rates, control premiums and multiples, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

Fiscal 2015

The performance of the Company’s annual impairment analysis did not result in any impairments of goodwill in fiscal 2015. Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the income approach valuation method were discount rates (ranging from 9%-14%), long-term growth rates (ranging from 0%-3%) and royalty rates (ranging from 0.5%-3.3%). Significant unobservable inputs utilized in the market approach valuation method were EBITDA multiples from guideline public companies operating in similar industries and control premiums (ranging from 10%-15%). Significant increases (decreases) in royalty rates, growth rates, control premiums and multiples, assuming no change in discount rates, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Significant decreases (increases) in discount rates, assuming no changes in royalty rates, growth rates, control premiums and multiples, would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.