XML 27 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2021

— Fair Value of Financial Instruments

GAAP establishes a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on the observability of inputs used in measuring financial instruments at fair value. GAAP establishes market-based or observable inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by valuation models using management assumptions in the absence of market inputs. The three levels of the hierarchy are described below:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.

The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. However, the Company expects that changes in classifications between levels will be rare.

Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Derivative Instruments

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The valuation of derivative instruments is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. In addition, credit valuation adjustments, are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the counterparties.

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those instruments fall.


(In thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets Level 1		Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3		Total
December 31, 2021
Derivative assets, at fair value	$	—	$	174	$	—	$	174
Derivative liabilities, at fair value	—		(13,903)		—		(13,903)
Total	$	—	$	(13,729)	$	—	$	(13,729)

December 31, 2020
Derivative assets, at fair value	$	—	$	13	$	—	$	13
Derivative liabilities, at fair value			(38,389)				(38,389)
Total	$	—	$	(38,376)	$	—	$	(38,376)

A review of the fair value hierarchy classification is conducted on a quarterly basis. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain assets. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Real Estate Investments Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

Real Estate Investments — Held for Use

The Company also had impaired real estate investments held for use, which were carried at fair value on a non-recurring basis on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. As of December 31, 2021, the Company owned four held for use properties in Texas for which the Company had reconsidered its expected holding period and which are marketed for sale. As a result, the Company evaluated the impact on its ability to recover the carrying value of the properties and recorded impairment charges to write these properties down to their estimated fair values. The Company had also previously written down other held for use properties which have subsequently been sold.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company evaluated four of its properties in Texas formerly leased to the LaSalle tenant and a property located in Sun City, Arizona and concluded, based on expected undiscounted cash flows, that the carrying value on these properties was not recoverable and the properties were impaired. Accordingly, the Company recorded impairment charges to reduce the carrying value of these properties to their estimated fair values based on estimated sales prices. Subsequent to December 31, 2021, the Company has entered into a purchase and sale agreement to dispose of the four LaSalle properties. Impaired real estate investments held for use are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 3 — Real Estate investments, Net - “Assets Held for Use and Related Impairments” for additional details.

Real Estate Investments — Held for Sale

The Company has impaired real estate investments held for sale, which are carried at net realizable value on a non-recurring basis on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020. Impaired real estate investments held for sale are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 3 — Real Estate investments, Net - “Assets Held for Sale and Related Impairments” for additional details.

Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value

The Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value. The fair values of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, straight-line rent receivable, net, prepaid expenses and other assets, deferred costs, net, accounts payable and accrued expenses, deferred rent and distributions payable approximate their carrying value on the consolidated balance sheets due to their short-term nature.

The fair values of the Company’s remaining financial instruments that are not reported at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets are reported below:


		December 31, 2021				December 31, 2020
(In thousands)	Level	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Gross mortgage notes payable and mortgage premium and discounts, net	3	$	590,425	$	594,348	$	548,889	$	549,553
Credit Facility	3	$	150,000	$	148,817	$	323,674	$	319,558
Fannie Mae Master Credit Facilities	3	$	355,045	$	350,710	$	355,175	$	354,073

The fair value of the mortgage notes payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on the Advisor’s experience with similar types of borrowing arrangements, excluding the value of derivatives. At December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, the carrying values of the Credit Facility and Fannie Mae Master Credit Facilities do not approximate their fair values due to the widening of credit spreads since the loans were originated.

- Definition

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References + Details