0001021432-13-000121.txt : 20130415 0001021432-13-000121.hdr.sgml : 20130415 20130412185923 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001021432-13-000121 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20121231 FILED AS OF DATE: 20130415 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20130412 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: Sandgate Acquisition Corp CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001559157 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: BLANK CHECKS [6770] IRS NUMBER: 000000000 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-54830 FILM NUMBER: 13759697 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 215 APOLENA AVENUE CITY: NEWPORT BEACH STATE: CA ZIP: 92662 BUSINESS PHONE: 202-415-3563 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 215 APOLENA AVENUE CITY: NEWPORT BEACH STATE: CA ZIP: 92662 10-K 1 sandgate10k123112.txt SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 000-54830 SANDGATE ACQUISITION CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 46-1856372 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 215 Apolena Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92662 (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 202/387-5400 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share (Title of class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act [ ] Yes [ X ] No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. [ ] Yes [ X ] No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [ X ] Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [ X ] Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ] Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer", "non-accelerated filer", and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large Accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ X ] (do not check if smaller reporting company) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ X ] Yes [ ] No State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $ 0 Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date. Class Outstanding at April 1, 2013 Common Stock, par value $0.0001 20,000,000 Documents incorporated by reference: None PART I Item 1. Business Sandgate Acquisition Corporation ("Sandgate" or the "Company") was incorporated on July 23, 2012 under the laws of the State of Delaware to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. Sandgate has been in the developmental stage since inception and its operations to date have been limited to issuing shares to its original shareholders and filing a registration statement. Sandgate has been formed to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting company with a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company registered its common stock on a Form 10 registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Rule 12(g) thereof. The Company files with the Securities and Exchange Commission periodic and current reports under Rule 13(a) of the Exchange Act, including quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and annual reports Form 10-K. The Company has no employees and two officers, directors and shareholders. The president of Sandgate is the president, director and shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation. Tiber Creek Corporation assists companies in becoming public reporting companies and with introductions to the financial community. To become a public company, Tiber Creek Corporation may recommend that a company file a registration statement, most likely on Form S-1, or alternatively that a company first effect a business combination with Sandgate and then subsequently file a registration statement. A company may choose to effect a business combination with Sandgate before filing a registration statement as such method may be an effective way to obtain exposure to the brokerage community. Tiber Creek will typically enter into an agreement with the target company for assisting it to become a public reporting company and for the preparation and filing of a registration statement and the introduction to brokers and market makers. The target company pays Tiber Creek Corporation for such services. Such services include, if appropriate, the use of Sandgate. Sandgate will only be used as part of such process and is not offered for sale. If the target company chooses to enter into business combination with Sandgate, the registration statement will be prepared after such business combination. The terms of a business combination may provide for redemption of all or part of their stock in Sandgate, usually at par. A combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of December 31, 2012, Sandgate had not generated revenues and had no income or cash flows from operations since inception. At December 31, 2012, Sandgate had sustained net loss of $1,357 and had accumulated a deficit of $1,357. The Company's independent auditors have issued a report raising substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. At present, the Company has no operations and the continuation of Sandgate as a going concern is dependent upon financial support from its stockholders, its ability to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations and/or to successfully locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with Sandgate. Tiber Creek Corporation will pay all expenses, without repayment, incurred by Sandgate until a changein control of the Company is effected, There is no written agreement between Tiber Creek Corporation and Sandgate. Tiber Creek is owned by James Cassidy and James Cassidy is also one of the two shareholders and directors of Sandgate. Through Mr. Cassidy, there is an unwritten understanding that Tiber Creek will fund the expenses of Sandgate until the consummation of a business combination. Because of the absence of any on-going operations, these expenses are anticipated to be relatively low. There is no assurance that Sandgate will ever be profitable. Item 2. Properties The Company has no properties and at this time has no agreements to acquire any properties. The Company currently uses the offices of Tiber Creek Corporation at no cost to the Company. Tiber Creek Corporation has agreed to continue this arrangement until the Company completes a change in control. Item 3. Legal Proceedings There is no litigation pending or threatened by or against the Company. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. Not applicable. PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities There is currently no public market for the Company's securities. Following a business combination, a target company will normally wish to cause the Company's common stock to trade in one or more United States securities markets. The target company may elect to take the steps required for such admission to quotation following the business combination or at some later time. At such time as it qualifies, the Company may choose to apply for quotation of its securities on the OTC Bulletin Board. The OTC Bulletin Board is a dealer-driven quotation service. Unlike the Nasdaq Stock Market, companies cannot directly apply to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, only market makers can initiate quotes, and quoted companies do not have to meet any quantitative financial requirements. Any equity security of a reporting company not listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market or on a national securities exchange is eligible. As such time as it qualifies, the Company may choose to apply for quotation of its securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market. In general there is greatest liquidity for traded securities on the Nasdaq Capital Market and less on the OTC Bulletin Board. It is not possible to predict where, if at all, the securities of the Company will be traded following a business combination. Since inception, the Company has sold securities which were not registered as follows: NUMBER OF DATE NAME SHARES CONSIDERATION July 30, 2012 Tiber Creek 10,000,000 $1,000 Corporation (1) July 30, 2012 MB Americus LLC (2) 10,000,000 $1,000 (1) James M. Cassidy, the president and a director of the Company, is the sole shareholder and director of Tiber Creek Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Mr. Cassidy may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of stock owned by Tiber Creek Corporation. (2) James McKillop is the sole principal of MB Americus LLC, a California limited liability corporation. Mr. McKillop is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of stock owned by MB Americus LLC. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. There is no selected financial data required to be filed for a smaller reporting company. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Sandgate has no operations nor does it currently engage in any business activities generating revenues. Sandgate's principal business objective is to achieve a business combination with a target company. As of December 31, 2012, Sandgate had not generated revenues and had no income or cash flows from operations since inception. At December 31, 2012, Sandgate had sustained net loss of $1,357, and had accumulated a deficit of $1,357. The Company's independent auditors have issued a report raising substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. At present, the Company has no operations and the continuation of Sandgate as a going concern is dependent upon financial support from its stockholders, its ability to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations and/or to successfully locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with Sandgate. Tiber Creek Corporation will pay all expenses incurred by Sandgate until a change in control is effected, without repayment. There is no written agreement between Tiber Creek Corporation and Sandgate. Tiber Creek is owned by James Cassidy and James Cassidy is also one of the two shareholders and directors of Sandgate. Through Mr. Cassidy, there is an unwritten understanding that Tiber Creek will fund the expenses of Sandgate until the consummation of a change in control. Because of the absence of any on-going operations, these expenses are anticipated to be relatively low. The president of Sandgate is the president, director and shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation. Tiber Creek Corporation assists companies in becoming public reporting companies and with introductions to the financial community. To become a public company, Tiber Creek Corporation may recommend that a company file a registration statement, most likely on Form S-1, or alternatively that a company first effect a business combination with Sandgate and then subsequently file a registration statement. A company may choose to effect a business combination with Sandgate before filing a registration statement as such method may be an effective way to obtain exposure to the brokerage community. Tiber Creek will typically enter into an agreement with the target company for assisting it to become a public reporting company and for the preparation and filing of a registration statement and the introduction to brokers and market makers. The target company pays Tiber Creek Corporation for such services. Such services include, if appropriate, the use of Sandgate. Sandgate will only be used as part of such process and is not offered for sale. If the target company chooses to enter into business combination with Sandgate, the registration statement will be prepared after such business combination. The terms of a business combination may provide for redemption of all or part of their stock in Sandgate, usually at par. A combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No assurances can be given that Sandgate will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company. The most likely target companies are those seeking the perceived benefits of a reporting corporation. Such perceived benefits may include facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be sought, providing liquidity for incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, increasing the opportunity to use securities for acquisitions, providing liquidity for shareholders and other factors. Business opportunities may be available in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities difficult and complex. Tiber Creek Corporation will supervise the search for target companies as potential candidates for a business combination. Tiber Creek Corporation will pay all expenses of the Company until such time as a change in control is effected, without repayment. James M. Cassidy, who is an officer and a director of the Company, is the sole officer and director and sole shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation. In analyzing prospective business opportunities, Tiber Creek may consider such matters as the available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operations, if any; prospects for the future; nature of present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management; the potential for further research, development, or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable but which may be anticipated; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition or acceptance of products, services, or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors. This discussion of the proposed criteria is not meant to be restrictive of the virtually unlimited discretion of the Company to search for and enter into potential business opportunities. The search for a target company will not be restricted to any specific kind of business entities, but may acquire a venture which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its business life. It is impossible to predict at this time the status of any business in which the Company may become engaged, whether such business may need to seek additional capital, may desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer. In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, the Company may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, licensing agreement or other arrangement with another corporation or entity. On the consummation of a transaction, it is likely that the present management and shareholders of the Company will no longer be in control of the Company. In addition, it is likely that the officer and director of the Company will, as part of the terms of the business combination, resign and be replaced by one or more new officers and directors. It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such business combination would be issued in reliance upon exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of its transaction, the Company may agree to register all or a part of such securities immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times thereafter. If such registration occurs, it will be undertaken by the surviving entity after the Company has entered into an agreement for a business combination or has consummated a business combination. The issuance of additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in the Company's securities may depress the market value of the Company's securities in the future if such a market develops, of which there is no assurance. While the terms of a business transaction to which the Company may be a party cannot be predicted, it is expected that the parties to the business transaction will desire to avoid the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition in a tax-free reorganization under Sections 351 or 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company will participate in a business combination only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require certain representations and warranties of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by the parties prior to and after such closing and will include miscellaneous other terms. The Board of Directors has passed a resolution which contains a policy that the Company will not seek a business combination with any entity in which the Company's officer, director, shareholders or any affiliate or associate serves as an officer or director or holds any ownership interest. 2012 Year-End Analysis The Company has received no income, has had no operations nor expenses, other than Delaware state fees and accounting fees as required for incorporation and for the preparation of the Company's financial statements. As of December 31, 2012, Sandgate had not generated revenues and had no income or cash flows from operations since inception. At December 31, 2012, Sandgate had sustained net loss of $1,357, and had accumulated a deficit of $1,357. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 are attached hereto. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure for the period covered by this report. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Pursuant to Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. the Company carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules. This evaluation was done as of the end of the fiscal year under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's principal executive officer (who is also the principal financial officer). There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation. Based upon that evaluation, he believes that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in gathering, analyzing and disclosing information needed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its periodic reports is recorded, summarized and processed timely. The principal executive officer is directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company. Management's Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting The Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's officer, its president, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria establish in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treaedway Commission. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012, based on those criteria. A control system can provide only reasonably, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected. Anton & Chia the independent registered public accounting firm for Sandgate, has not issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of Sandgate's internal control over financial reporting. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during its fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting. Item 9B. Other information Not applicable. PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance; The Directors and Officers of the Company are as follows: Name Age Positions and Offices Held ----------------- ----------- James Cassidy 77 President, Secretary, Director James McKillop 53 Vice President, Director Management of Sandgate Sandgate has no full time employees. James Cassidy and James McKillop are the officers and directors of Sandgate and its indirect beneficial shareholders. Mr. Cassidy, as president of Sandgate, and Mr. McKillop as vice president, will allocate a limited portion of time to the activities of Sandgate without compensation. Potential conflicts may arise with respect to the limited time commitment by management and the potential demands of the activities of Sandgate. There are no agreements or understandings for the officer or director to resign at the request of another person and the above- named officer and director is not acting on behalf of nor will act at the direction of any other person. Set forth below are the names of the directors and officers of the Company, all positions and offices with the Company held, the period during which they have served as such, and the business experience during at least the last five years: James Cassidy, Esq., LL.B., LL.M., serves as a director, president and secretary of Sandgate. Mr. Cassidy received a Bachelor of Science in Languages and Linguistics from Georgetown University in 1960, a Bachelor of Laws from The Catholic University School of Law in 1963, and a Master of Laws in Taxation from The Georgetown University School of Law in 1968. From 1963-1964, Mr. Cassidy was law clerk to the Honorable Inzer B. Wyatt of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. From 1964-1965, Mr. Cassidy was law clerk to the Honorable Wilbur K. Miller of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. From 1969-1975, Mr. Cassidy was an associate of the law firm of Kieffer & Moroney and a principal in the law firm of Kieffer & Cassidy, Washington, D.C. From 1975 to date, Mr. Cassidy has been a principal in the law firm of Cassidy & Associates, and its predecessors, specializing in securities law and related corporate and federal taxation matters. Mr. Cassidy is a member of the bars of the District of Columbia and the State of New York, and is admitted to practice before the United States Tax Court and the United States Supreme Court. Sandgate believes Mr. Cassidy to have the business experience necessary to serve as a director of Sandgate as it seeks to enter into a business combination. As a lawyer involved in business transactions and securities matters, Mr. Cassidy has had ample experience in evaluating companies and management, understanding business plans, assisting in capital raising and determining corporate structure and objectives. James McKillop serves as a director and vice president of Sandgate. Mr. McKillop began his career at Merrill Lynch. Mr. McKillop has also been involved in financial reporting and did a daily stock market update for KPCC radio in Pasadena, California. Mr. McKillop is the founder of MB Americus LLC which specializes in consulting and public relations. Mr. McKillop has provided consulting services to Tiber Creek Corporation for more than five years. Mr. McKillop has written articles for various publications on financial matters. He has been a past member of the World Affairs Council. Mr. McKillop received his Bachelor of Arts in Economics in 1984 from the University of California at Los Angeles. With his background in financial and securities matters, Sandgate believes Mr. McKillop to have experience and knowledge that will serve Sandgate in seeking, evaluating and determining a suitable target company. There are no agreements or understandings for the above-named officers or directors to resign at the request of another person and the above-named officers and directors are not acting on behalf of nor will act at the direction of any other person. Recent Blank Check Companies James Cassidy, the president and a director of Sandgate and James McKillop, vice president and a director of Sandgate, are involved with other existing blank check companies, and in creating additional similar companies. The initial business purpose of each of these companies was or is to engage in a business combination with an unidentified company or companies and each were or will be classified as a blank check company until completion of a business combination. The information summarizes the blank check companies with which Mr. Cassidy and/or Mr. McKillop is or has been involved in the past five years which filed a registration statement on Form 10 or Form 10-SB. In most instances that a business combination is transacted with one of these companies, it is required to file a Current Report on Form 8-K describing the transaction. Reference is made to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed for any company listed below and for additional detailed information concerning the business combination entered into by that company. Cabinet Acquisition Corporation: Form 10-SB filed on 8/28/2000, file number 0-31398. Mr. Cassidy was the sole indirect beneficial shareholder, officer and director of the corporation. On October 8, 2009, the corporation effected a change in control with the redemption of stock and the issuance of additional stock and the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy retained 500,000 shares and resigned from all offices and as a director. Canistel Acquisition Corporation. Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53255. Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On December 7, 2010, the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on December 3, 2010 with redemption of 250,000 shares from each of the then two shareholders, the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 250,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee. Console Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53257. Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On December 22, 2009, the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on December 21, 2009 with the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 250,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee. Hightower Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53258. Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On May 12, 2010, the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on December 3, 2010 with redemption of 375,000 shares from each of the then two shareholders, the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 125,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee. Spinnet Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53256 Mr. Cassidy was the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop was an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial shareholder. On October 5, 2009 the corporation filed a form 8-K noticing the change of control effected on September 30, 2010 with redemption of 250,000 shares from each of the then two shareholders, the issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each retained 250,000 shares. Mr. Cassidy resigned from all offices and as a director and Mr. McKillop resigned as an employee. Greenmark Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 23, 2008, file number 000-53259. Mr. Cassidy is the sole officer and director and Mr. McKillop is an employee of the corporation. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop are the only shareholders and each is the indirect beneficial shareholder of 500,000 shares. Alderwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on October 7, 2010, file number 000-54148. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively, Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On July 20, 2011 the corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected July 15, 2011 with the redemption of 19,800,000 shares of the 20,000,000 shares of outstanding stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 100,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation has been changed to SGreenTech Group Ltd. and subsequently changed to Pixtel Group Ltd. Oakwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on October 7, 2010, file number 000-54147. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively, Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On December 12, 2011 the corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected November 30, 2011 with the redemption of 19,500,000 shares of the 20,000,000 shares of outstanding stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation has been changed to Bristol Rhace Natural Resource Corporation Pinewood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on October 7, 2010, file number 000-54146. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively, Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On June 1, 2011, Pinewood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected May 25, 2011 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 of the then 20,000,000 shares of outstanding common stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation has been changed to De Yang International Group Ltd. and subsequently changed to Fun World Media, Inc. Sherwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on October 7, 2010, file number 000-54145. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively, Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On July 22, 2011, Sherwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected July 20, 2011 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,800,000 shares of the then 20,000,000 shares of of outstanding common stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 100,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. Beachwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on June 2, 2011, file number 000-54423. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively, Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On August 31, 2011 Beachwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected August 31, 2011 with the redemption of an aggregate of 18,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 750,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to BioPharma Manufacturing Solutions Inc. Boxwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on June 2, 2011, file number 000-54424. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively, Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On November 1, 2011 Boxwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected October 28, 2011 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all ofices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to GreenPower International Group, Ltd. Cottonwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on June 2, 2011, file number 000-54425. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On November 2, 2011 Cottonwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected October 30, 2011 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,700,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 150,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all ofices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Greenpower International Group, Inc. Driftwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on June 2, 2011, file number 000-54426. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares at the time covered by this report. Subsequent to this period covered by this report, Driftwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected February 1, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock, issuance of additional shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all ofices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Pivotal Group, Inc. Moosewood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on June 2, 2011, file number 000-54427. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On May 23, 2012, Moosewood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected May 22, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to First Rate Staffing Corporation. First Rate Staffing Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing a business combination in the form of a merger with First Rate Staffing, LLC and First Rate Staffing, Inc. (Nevada) and a change in its status on November 13, 2012. Amberwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on November 8, 2011, file number 000-54541. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. Amberwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected March 27, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to American Laser Healthcare Corporation. Bluewood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on November 8, 2011, file number 000-54542. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On April 30, 2012, Bluewood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected April 30, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Xtreme Healthcare Corporation. Xtreme Healthcare Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing a business combination in the form of a stock-for-stock acquisition with Xtreme Care Ambulance Inc. and a change in its status on November 13, 2012. 24 ______________________________________________________________________ Rosewood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on November 8, 2011, file number 000-54544. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On April 3, 2012, Rosewood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected March 31, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. Silverwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on November 8, 2011, file number 000-54545. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On January 4, 2013, Silverwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected December 20, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on November 8, 2011, file number 000-54546. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On April 17, 2012, Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected April 17, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock ata per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. On June 6, 2012, Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing a business combination in the form of a merger with Ameri Metro, Inc. which included a change of the name of Yellowwood Acquisition Corporation as the surviving corporation to Ameri Metro, Inc. and a change in its status. Bentwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on January 27, 2012, file number 000-54590. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On July 17, 2012, Bentwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected July 11, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Rezilient Direct Corporation. Sandgate Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on January 27, 2012, file number 000-54591. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On October 5, 2012, Harwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,700,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 150,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Moxian Corporation. Lightwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on January 27, 2012, file number 000-54592. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On October 16, 2012, Lightwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,700,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 150,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Greenpro Resources Corporation. Roundwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on January 27, 2012, file number 000-54593. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On June 15, 2012, Roundwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected June 7, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 10,500,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Bio Oil National Corporation. 25 ______________________________________________________________________ Timberwood Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on January 27, 2012, file number 000-54594. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On May 15, 2012, Timberwood Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected May 12, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 19,500,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. Entree Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 30, 2012, file number 000-54720. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On October 3, 2012, Entree Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 2,774,126 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Hauge Technology, Inc. Gumtree Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 30, 2012, file number 000-54721. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On September 17, 2012, Gumtree Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control effected September 7, 2012 with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 19,500,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Access US Oil & Gas, Inc. Sagetree Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 30, 2012, file number 000-54722. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On September 27, 2012, Sagetree Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. Saddletree Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 30, 2012, file number 000-54723. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On November 2, 2012, Saddletree Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Go Green Smokeless Oil International Inc. Whiffletree Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on May 30, 2012, file number 000-54724. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On November 2, 2012, Whiffletree Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,750,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 125,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Whoopass Poker Corporation. Backgate Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on October 10, 2012, file number 000-54824. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On February 26, 2013, Backgate Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to JMJP Partners, Inc. Beachgate Acquisition Corporation: Form 10 filed on October 10, 2012, file number 000-54825. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were both directors of the corporation and served as president and vice president, respectively. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop were the only shareholders and each was indirect beneficial owner of 10,000,000 shares. On MArch 28, 2013, Beachgate Acquisition Corporation filed a Form 8-K noticing the change of control with the redemption of an aggregate of 19,500,000 shares of the then outstanding 20,000,000 shares of common stock at a per share redemption price at par of $.0001, the issuance of 1,000,000 additional shares of common stock at a per share price at par of $.0001, the election of new directors and appointment of new officers. Mr. Cassidy and Mr. McKillop each beneficially retained 250,000 shares of stock. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop each resigned from all offices and as directors. The name of the corporation was changed to Essential Telecommunications, Inc. Conflicts of Interest The officers and directors of Sandgate have organized and expect to organize other companies with an identicial structure, purpose, officers, directors and shareholders. As such management believes there is no conflict of interest in these companies. Messrs. Cassidy and McKillop are also the directors of, and sole beneficial shareholders of the following companies which have filed registration statements on Form 10 for the registration of their common stock pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act: Fordgate Acquisition Corporation Harrogate Acquisition Corporation Sidegate Acquisition Corporation Tablegate Acquisition Corporation Treegate Acquisition Corporation Wallgate Acquisition Corporation Woodgate Acquisition Corporation The blank check companies with which management (including the directors) is involved are identical except for the name. As and when created, no one blank check company offers management any more favorable terms. After Tiber Creek engages a private company that wishes to become a public company and the decision is made to utilize a blank check company as part of that process, the client will choose one of the blank check companies, based solely upon the name as all other terms are identical. Thus no conflict of interest arises for management between any of the blank check companies. Mr. Cassidy and/or Mr. McKillop may become associated with additional blank check companies prior to the time that Sandgate has effected a business combination. Mr. Cassidy is the principal of Cassidy & Associates, a securities law firm. As such, demands may be placed on the time of Mr. Cassidy which will detract from the amount of time he is able to devote to Sandgate. Mr. Cassidy intends to devote as much time to the activities of Sandgate as required. However, should such a conflict arise, there is no assurance that Mr. Cassidy would not attend to other matters prior to those of Sandgate. Mr. Cassidy is the president, sole director and shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation, which is a shareholder of Sandgate. At the time of a business combination, some or all of the shares of common stock owned by Tiber Creek Corporation may be retired by Sandgate. The amount of common stock which may be sold or continued to be owned by Tiber Creek Corporation cannot be determined at this time. Mr. McKillop is the manager and sole member of MB Americus LLC which is a shareholder of Sandgate. At the time of a business combination, some or all of the shares of common stock owned by MB Americus LLC may be purchased or retired by Sandgate. The amount of common stock which may be sold or continued to be owned by MB Americus cannot be determined at this time. The terms of a business combination may provide for a nominal payment by cash to Tiber Creek Corporation and MB Americus LLC for the retirement of all or part of the common stock of Sandgate owned by them. There are no binding guidelines or procedures for resolving potential conflicts of interest. Failure by management to resolve conflicts of interest in favor of the Company could result in liability of management to the Company. However, any attempt by shareholders to enforce a liability of management to the Company would most likely be prohibitively expensive and time consuming. Tiber Creek Corporation will pay, without repayment, all expenses incurred by Sandgate until a change in control is effected. There is no written agreement between Tiber Creek Corporation and Sandgate. Tiber Creek is owned by James Cassidy and James Cassidy is also one of the two shareholders and directors of Sandgate. Through Mr. Cassidy, there is an unwritten understanding that Tiber Creek will fund the expenses of Sandgate until the consummation of a change in control. Because of the absence of any on-going operations, these expenses are anticipated to be relatively low. Code of Ethics. The Company has not at this time adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to rules described in Regulation S-K. The Company has two persons who are the only shareholders and who serve as the directors and officers. The Company has no operations or business and does not receive any revenues or investment capital. The adoption of an Ethical Code at this time would not serve the primary purpose of such a code to provide a manner of conduct as the development, execution and enforcement of such a code would be by the same persons and only persons to whom such code applied. Furthermore, because the Company does not have any activities, there are activities or transactions which would be subject to this code. At the time the Company enters into a business combination or other corporate transaction, the current officers and directors will recommend to any new management that such a code be adopted. The Company does not maintain an Internet website on which to post a code of ethics. Corporate Governance. For reasons similar to those described above, the Company does not have a nominating nor audit committee of the board of directors. At this time, the Company consists of two shareholders who serve as the corporate directors and officers. The Company has no activities, and receives no revenues. At such time that the Company enters into a business combination and/or has additional shareholders and a larger board of directors and commences activities, the Company will propose creating committees of its board of directors, including both a nominating and an audit committee. Because there are only two shareholders of the Company, there is no established process by which shareholders to the Company can nominate members to the Company's board of directors. Similarly, however, at such time as the Company has more shareholders and an expanded board of directors, the new management of the Company may review and implement, as necessary, procedures for shareholder nomination of members to the Company's board of directors. Item 11. Executive Compensation The Company's officers and directors do not receive any compensation for services rendered to the Company, nor have they received such compensation in the past. The officers and directors are not accruing any compensation pursuant to any agreement with the Company. No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by the Company for the benefit of its employees. The Company does not have a compensation committee for the same reasons as described above. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2012, each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of five percent or more of the Company's common stock and the director and officer of the Company. The Company does not have any compensation plans and has not authorized any securities for future issuance. Except as noted, the holder thereof has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. Name and Address Amount of Beneficial Percent of of Beneficial Owner Ownership Outstanding Stock James M. Cassidy (1) 10,000,000 50% 215 Apolena Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92662 James K. McKillop (2) 10,000,000 50% 9454 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, California 90212 All Executive Officers and 20,000,000 100% Directors as a Group (2 Persons) (1) As the sole shareholder, officer and director of Tiber Creek Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Mr. Cassidy is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of common stock of Sandgate owned by it. (2) As the sole principal of MB Americus LLC, a California business entity, Mr. McKillop is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares of Sandgate owned by it. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence Sandgate has issued a total of 20,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for a total of $2,000 in cash. James M. Cassidy is president and a director of Sandgate and the sole officer, director and the shareholder of Tiber Creek Corporation, which is a 50% shareholder of Sandgate. James McKillop is vice president and a director of Sandgate and the sole manager and member of MB Americus LLC, which is a 50% shareholder of Sandgate. As the organizers and developers of Sandgate, James M. Cassidy and James McKillop may be considered promoters. Mr. Cassidy has provided services to Sandgate without charge consisting of preparing and filing the charter corporate documents and preparing this registration statement. Tiber Creek Corporation, a company of which Mr. Cassidy is the sole director, officer and shareholder, has paid and will continue to pay all expenses incurred by Sandgate until a business combination is effected, without repayment. Tiber Creek is a shareholder of Sandgate and may receive benefits in the future if the company is able to effect a business combination beneficial to the company. Sandgate is not currently required to maintain an independent director as defined by Rule 4200 of the Nasdaq Capital Market nor does it anticipate that it will be applying for listing of its securities on an exchange in which an independent directorship is required. It is likely that neither Mr. Cassidy nor Mr. McKillop would not be considered independent directors if it were to do so. Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services. The Company has no activities, no income and no expenses except for independent audit and Delaware state fees. The Company's president has donated his time in preparation and filing of all state and federal required taxes and reports. Audit Fees The aggregate fees incurred for each of the last two years for professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for the audits of the Company's annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in the Company's Form 10-K and Form 10-Q reports and services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were as follows: December 31, 2012 ----------------- ======= Audit-Related Fees $ 750 The Company does not currently have an audit committee serving and as a result its board of directors performs the duties of an audit committee. The board of directors will evaluate and approve in advance, the scope and cost of the engagement of an auditor before the auditor renders audit and non-audit services. The Company does not rely on pre- approval policies and procedures. PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules There are no financial statement schedules nor exhibits filed herewith. The exhibits filed in earlier reports and the Company's Form 10 are incorporated herein by reference. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 1 Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012 2 Statement of Operations for the period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 3 Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 4 Statement of Cash Flows for the period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 5 Notes to Financial Statements 6-8 ANTON & CHIA CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (a development stage company) We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2012, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) through December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company was not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows from July 23, 2012 (Inception) through December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has had no revenues and income since inception. These conditions, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2, which includes the raising of additional equity financing or merger with another entity. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. /s/ Anton & Chia LLP Newport Beach, CA April 10, 2013 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) BALANCE SHEET As of December 31, 2012 ASSETS December 31, 2012 ----------------- Current Assets Cash $ 2,000 ----------------- Total Assets $ 2,000 ================= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current Liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 350 ----------------- Total Liabilities $ 350 ----------------- Stockholders' Equity Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, $ - 20,000,000 shares authorized; none outstanding Common Stock; $0.0001 par value, 2,000 100,000,000 shares authorized; 20,000,000 shares issued and outstanding Additional paid-in capital 1,007 Deficit accumulated during the development stage (1,357) ----------------- Total Stockholders' Equity $ 1,650 ----------------- Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $ 2,000 ================= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 2 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS For the Period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 For the period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 ----------------- Revenue $ - Cost of revenue - ----------------- Gross profit - ================= Operating expenses 1,357 ----------------- Operating Income (Loss) (1,357) Loss before Income Taxes (1,357) Income tax - ----------------- Net loss $ (1,357) ================= Loss per share - basic and diluted $ (0.00) ----------------- Weighted average shares-basic and diluted 20,000,000 ================= The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 3 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY For the Period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012
Deficit Accumulated Common Stock Additional During the Total ----------------------- Paid-In Development Stockholders' Shares Amount Capital Stage Equity Balance, July 23, 2012 (Inception) - $ - $ - $ - $ - Issuance of common stock 20,000,000 2,000 - - 2,000 Additional paid-in capital - - 1,007 - 1,007 Net loss - - - (1,357) (1,357) ========== ======= ======= ========= ========= Balance, December 31, 2012 20,000,000 $ 2,000 $ 1,007 $(1,357) $ 1,650 ========== ======= ======= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 4 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS For the Period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 For the period from July 23, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 ------------------ OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net loss $ (1,357) ------------------ Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities Accrued liabilities 350 ------------------ Net cash used in operating activities (1,007) ------------------ FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from issuance of common stock 2,000 Proceeds from stockholders' contribution 1,007 ------------------ Net cash provided by financing activities 3,007 ------------------ Net increase in cash 2,000 Cash, beginning of period - ------------------ Cash, end of period $ 2,000 ================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 5 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 1 NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES NATURE OF OPERATIONS Sandgate Acquisition Corporation ("Sandgate" or "the Company") was incorporated on July 23, 2012 under the laws of the state of Delaware to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. The Company has been in the developmental stage since inception and its operations to date have been limited to issuing shares to its original shareholders. The Company will attempt to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with Sandgate. The combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company. The Company has been formed to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting company with a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the Company's financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of the Company's management, who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying financial statements. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and on deposit at banking institutions as well as all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. The Company did not have cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012. CONCENTRATION OF RISK Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company places its cash with high quality banking institutions. The Company did not have cash balances in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit as of December 31, 2012. 6 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) Notes to the Financial Statements INCOME TAXES Under ASC 740, "Income Taxes", deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As of December 31, 2012, there were no deferred taxes. LOSS PER COMMON SHARE Basic loss per common share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the loss of the entity. As of December 31, 2012, there are no outstanding dilutive securities. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS The Company follows guidance for accounting for fair value measurements of financial assets and financial liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. Additionally, the Company adopted guidance for fair value measurement related to nonfinancial items that are recognized and disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a nonrecurring basis. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to measurements involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. The carrying amounts of financial assets such as cash approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN The Company is in the development stage and has no revenues or profits since its inception on July 23, 2012. The Company's continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations, which it has not been able to accomplish to date, and /or obtain additional financing from its stockholders and/or other third parties. These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to meet its obligations and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon financial support from its stockholders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, successfully locating and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with the Company. 7 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) Notes to the Financial Statements Tiber Creek Corporation, a company affiliated with management, will pay all expenses incurred by the Company until a business combination is effected, without repayment. There is no assurance that the Company will ever be profitable. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. NOTE 3 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 represents the converged guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on fair value measurement. A variety of measures are included in the update intended to either clarify existing fair value measurement requirements, change particular principles requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend to change the application of existing requirements under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements. Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 is intended to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of accounting guidance in this area with that of the IASB. The amendments require that all nonowner changes in shareholders' equity be presented in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-12). ASU 2011-12 defers the provisions of ASU 2011-05 that require the presentation of reclassification adjustments on the face of both the statement of income and statement of other comprehensive income. Amendments under ASU 2011-05 that were not deferred under ASU 2011-12 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-11). The amendments in ASU 2011-11 require the disclosure of information on offsetting and related arrangements for financial and derivative instruments to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Amendments under ASU 2011-11 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after January 1, 2013. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any; adoption of ASU 2011-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASB's deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company is evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of ASU 2013-02 will have on its financial statements 7 Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY) Notes to the Financial Statements NOTE 4 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2012, 20,000,000 shares of common stock and no preferred stock were issued and outstanding. On July 31, 2012, the Company issued 20,000,000 common shares to two directors and officers for $2,000 in cash. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. SANDGATE ACQUISITION CORPORATION By: /s/ James M. Cassidy James M. Cassidy, President Principal executive officer Dated: April 11, 2013 By: /s/ James M. Cassidy James M. Cassidy, President Principal financial officer Dated: April 11, 2013 Pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. NAME OFFICE DATE /s/ James M. Cassidy Director April 11, 2013
EX-32 2 ex32sandgateceocfo.txt EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of Sandgate Acquisition Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that: The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. /s/ James Cassidy Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Date: April 11, 2013 EX-31 3 exh31ksandgatecfoceo.txt EXHIBIT 31 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 I, James Cassidy, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of Sandgate Acquisition Corporation. 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: April 11, 2013 /s/ James Cassidy Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer