Agreements Related to Intellectual Property	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2015
Agreements Related to Intellectual Property
Agreements Related to Intellectual Property	13. Agreements Related to Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement and Finder’s Services Agreement In August 2012, the Company entered into an assignment agreement with the Estate of Mickey Miller, or the Miller Estate, under which the Company acquired some of the intellectual property rights covering A-101. The assignment of intellectual property rights covers specified know-how, along with modifications of, improvements to and variations on A-101 that meet defined chemical properties. Under the agreement, the Company has the sole and exclusive right, but not the duty, to develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize A-101 in various countries throughout the world. The Company is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize at least one product for at least one indication in the United States. In connection with obtaining the assignment of the intellectual property from the Miller Estate, the Company also entered into a separate finder’s services agreement with KPT Consulting, LLC. Under the terms of the assignment agreement and the finder’s services agreement, the Company made one-time milestone payments of $400 in 2013 upon the dosing of the first human subject with A-101 in the Company’s Phase 2 clinical trial. There are no remaining potential milestone payments under the assignment agreement. Under the finder’s services agreement, the Company made a one-time milestone payment of $300 in February 2016 upon the dosing of the first human subject with A-101 in the Company’s Phase 3 clinical trial and is obligated to make additional milestone payments of up to $1,000 in the aggregate upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones and up to $4,500 upon the achievement of specified commercial milestones. Under each of the assignment agreement and the finder’s services agreement, the Company is also obligated to pay royalties on sales of A-101 or related products, at low single-digit percentages of net sales, subject to reduction in specified circumstances. The Company has not made any royalty payments to date under either agreement. Both agreements will terminate upon the expiration of the last pending, viable patent claim of the patents acquired under the assignment agreement, but no sooner than 15 years from the effective date of the agreements. License Agreement with Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In August 2015, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide license and collaboration agreement with Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Rigel”) for the development and commercialization of products containing specified JAK inhibitors developed by Rigel. Under this agreement, the Company intends to develop these JAK inhibitors for the treatment of alopecia areata and potentially for other dermatological conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company made an upfront non-refundable payment of $8,000 to Rigel. In addition, the Company has agreed to make aggregate payments of up to $80,000 upon the achievement of specified pre‑commercialization milestones, such as clinical trials and regulatory approvals. Further, the Company has agreed to pay up to an additional $10,000 to Rigel upon the achievement of a second set of development milestones. With respect to any products the Company commercializes under the agreement, the Company will pay Rigel quarterly tiered royalties on its annual net sales of each product at a high single‑digit percentage of annual net sales, subject to specified reductions, until the date that all of the patent rights for that product have expired, as determined on a country‑by‑country and product‑by‑product basis or, in specified countries under specified circumstances, ten years from the first commercial sale of such product. The agreement terminates on the date of expiration of all royalty obligations unless earlier terminated by either party for a material breach. The Company may also terminate the agreement without cause at any time upon advance written notice to Rigel. Rigel, after consultation with the Company, will be responsible for maintaining and prosecuting the patent rights, and the Company will have final decision making authority regarding such patent rights for a product in the United States and the European Union. To the extent that the Company and Rigel jointly develop intellectual property, the parties will confer and decide which party will be responsible for filing, prosecuting and maintaining those patent rights. The agreement also establishes a joint steering committee composed of an equal number of representatives for each party which will monitor progress in the development of products. The Company accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition as the licensing arrangement did not meet the definition of a business pursuant to the guidance prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the Company recorded the $8,000 upfront payment as research and development expense in the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company will record as expense any contingent milestone payments or royalties in the period in which such liabilities are incurred. The Company concluded that licensing arrangement with Rigel did not meet the definition of a business because the transaction principally resulted in its acquisition of intellectual property. As part of the transaction, the Company did not acquire any employees or tangible assets, or any processes, protocols or operating systems. In addition, at the time of the acquisition, there were no activities being conducted related to the licensed patents. The Company will expense the acquired intellectual property asset as of the acquisition date on the basis that costs of intangible assets that are purchased from others for use in research and development activities and that have no alternative future uses are research and development costs at the time the costs are incurred. License and Collaboration Agreement with JAKPharm LLC and Key Organics, LTD In November 2015, the Company entered into a commercial license agreement with JAKPharm LLC (“JAKPharm”) and Key Organics, LTD (“Key Organics” and collectively, “Licensors”) for the development and commercialization of products containing specified compounds developed by the Licensors. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company expensed an upfront non-refundable payment of $250 to the Licensors. The Company will also make annual maintenance payments of $50 per year, which will be creditable against any payments made in such calendar year. In addition, the Company has agreed to make aggregate payments of up to $2,350 upon specified pre‑commercialization milestones, such as clinical trials and regulatory approvals. With respect to any products the Company commercializes under the agreement, the Company will pay the Licensors royalties on its annual net sales of each product at a low single‑digit percentage of annual net sales, until the date that all of the patent rights for that product have expired, as determined on a country-by-country and licensed product-by-licensed product basis or, in specified countries under specified circumstances, ten years from the first commercial sale of such product. The Company may terminate the agreement without cause with three months written notice to the Licensors. The Company accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition as the licensing arrangement did not meet the definition of a business pursuant to the guidance prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the Company recorded the $250 upfront payment as research and development expense in the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company will record as expense any contingent milestone payments or royalties in the period in which such liabilities are incurred. The Company concluded that licensing arrangement with the Licensors did not meet the definition of a business because the transaction principally resulted in its acquisition of intellectual property. As part of the transaction, the Company did not acquire any employees or tangible assets, or any processes, protocols or operating systems. In addition, at the time of the acquisition, there were no activities being conducted related to the licensed patents. The Company will expense the acquired intellectual property asset as of the acquisition date on the basis that costs of intangible assets that are purchased from others for use in research and development activities and that have no alternative future uses are research and development costs at the time the costs are incurred.

13. Agreements Related to Intellectual Property

Assignment Agreement and Finder’s Services Agreement

In August 2012, the Company entered into an assignment agreement with the Estate of Mickey Miller, or the Miller Estate, under which the Company acquired some of the intellectual property rights covering A-101. The assignment of intellectual property rights covers specified know-how, along with modifications of, improvements to and variations on A-101 that meet defined chemical properties. Under the agreement, the Company has the sole and exclusive right, but not the duty, to develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize A-101 in various countries throughout the world. The Company is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize at least one product for at least one indication in the United States. In connection with obtaining the assignment of the intellectual property from the Miller Estate, the Company also entered into a separate finder’s services agreement with KPT Consulting, LLC.

Under the terms of the assignment agreement and the finder’s services agreement, the Company made one-time milestone payments of $400 in 2013 upon the dosing of the first human subject with A-101 in the Company’s Phase 2 clinical trial. There are no remaining potential milestone payments under the assignment agreement. Under the finder’s services agreement, the Company made a one-time milestone payment of $300 in February 2016 upon the dosing of the first human subject with A-101 in the Company’s Phase 3 clinical trial and is obligated to make additional milestone payments of up to $1,000 in the aggregate upon the achievement of specified development and regulatory milestones and up to $4,500 upon the achievement of specified commercial milestones. Under each of the assignment agreement and the finder’s services agreement, the Company is also obligated to pay royalties on sales of A-101 or related products, at low single-digit percentages of net sales, subject to reduction in specified circumstances. The Company has not made any royalty payments to date under either agreement. Both agreements will terminate upon the expiration of the last pending, viable patent claim of the patents acquired under the assignment agreement, but no sooner than 15 years from the effective date of the agreements.

License Agreement with Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In August 2015, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide license and collaboration agreement with Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Rigel”) for the development and commercialization of products containing specified JAK inhibitors developed by Rigel. Under this agreement, the Company intends to develop these JAK inhibitors for the treatment of alopecia areata and potentially for other dermatological conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company made an upfront non-refundable payment of $8,000 to Rigel. In addition, the Company has agreed to make aggregate payments of up to $80,000 upon the achievement of specified pre‑commercialization milestones, such as clinical trials and regulatory approvals. Further, the Company has agreed to pay up to an additional $10,000 to Rigel upon the achievement of a second set of development milestones. With respect to any products the Company commercializes under the agreement, the Company will pay Rigel quarterly tiered royalties on its annual net sales of each product at a high single‑digit percentage of annual net sales, subject to specified reductions, until the date that all of the patent rights for that product have expired, as determined on a country‑by‑country and product‑by‑product basis or, in specified countries under specified circumstances, ten years from the first commercial sale of such product.

The agreement terminates on the date of expiration of all royalty obligations unless earlier terminated by either party for a material breach. The Company may also terminate the agreement without cause at any time upon advance written notice to Rigel. Rigel, after consultation with the Company, will be responsible for maintaining and prosecuting the patent rights, and the Company will have final decision making authority regarding such patent rights for a product in the United States and the European Union. To the extent that the Company and Rigel jointly develop intellectual property, the parties will confer and decide which party will be responsible for filing, prosecuting and maintaining those patent rights. The agreement also establishes a joint steering committee composed of an equal number of representatives for each party which will monitor progress in the development of products.

The Company accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition as the licensing arrangement did not meet the definition of a business pursuant to the guidance prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the Company recorded the $8,000 upfront payment as research and development expense in the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company will record as expense any contingent milestone payments or royalties in the period in which such liabilities are incurred. The Company concluded that licensing arrangement with Rigel did not meet the definition of a business because the transaction principally resulted in its acquisition of intellectual property. As part of the transaction, the Company did not acquire any employees or tangible assets, or any processes, protocols or operating systems. In addition, at the time of the acquisition, there were no activities being conducted related to the licensed patents. The Company will expense the acquired intellectual property asset as of the acquisition date on the basis that costs of intangible assets that are purchased from others for use in research and development activities and that have no alternative future uses are research and development costs at the time the costs are incurred.

License and Collaboration Agreement with JAKPharm LLC and Key Organics, LTD

In November 2015, the Company entered into a commercial license agreement with JAKPharm LLC (“JAKPharm”) and Key Organics, LTD (“Key Organics” and collectively, “Licensors”) for the development and commercialization of products containing specified compounds developed by the Licensors. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company expensed an upfront non-refundable payment of $250 to the Licensors. The Company will also make annual maintenance payments of $50 per year, which will be creditable against any payments made in such calendar year. In addition, the Company has agreed to make aggregate payments of up to $2,350 upon specified pre‑commercialization milestones, such as clinical trials and regulatory approvals. With respect to any products the Company commercializes under the agreement, the Company will pay the Licensors royalties on its annual net sales of each product at a low single‑digit percentage of annual net sales, until the date that all of the patent rights for that product have expired, as determined on a country-by-country and licensed product-by-licensed product basis or, in specified countries under specified circumstances, ten years from the first commercial sale of such product. The Company may terminate the agreement without cause with three months written notice to the Licensors.

The Company accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition as the licensing arrangement did not meet the definition of a business pursuant to the guidance prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the Company recorded the $250 upfront payment as research and development expense in the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company will record as expense any contingent milestone payments or royalties in the period in which such liabilities are incurred. The Company concluded that licensing arrangement with the Licensors did not meet the definition of a business because the transaction principally resulted in its acquisition of intellectual property. As part of the transaction, the Company did not acquire any employees or tangible assets, or any processes, protocols or operating systems. In addition, at the time of the acquisition, there were no activities being conducted related to the licensed patents. The Company will expense the acquired intellectual property asset as of the acquisition date on the basis that costs of intangible assets that are purchased from others for use in research and development activities and that have no alternative future uses are research and development costs at the time the costs are incurred.