XML 23 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.23.3
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2023
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE  
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE

NOTE 6 — PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE

In accordance with the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures under U.S. GAAP, the Company discloses the fair value of its investments in a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The guidance establishes three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 — Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;

Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The level of an asset or liability within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by management.

The Company considers whether the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifies transactions that are not orderly in determining fair value. Accordingly, if the Company determines that either the volume and/or level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased (from normal conditions for that asset or liability) or price quotations or observable inputs are not associated with orderly transactions, increased analysis and management judgment will be required to estimate fair value. Valuation techniques such as an income approach might be appropriate to supplement or replace a market approach in those circumstances.

At September 30, 2023, the Company had investments in 96 portfolio companies. The total cost and fair value of the investments were $941,679,195 and $886,338,148, respectively. The composition of our investments as of September 30, 2023 is as follows:

Cost

Fair Value

Senior Secured – First Lien(1)

$

818,753,394

$

793,131,815

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

60,218,330

21,935,000

Unsecured Debt

 

5,922,437

5,675,605

Equity

 

56,785,034

65,595,728

Total Investments

$

941,679,195

$

886,338,148

(1)Includes unitranche investments, which may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured, as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans. Our unitranche loans may expose us to certain risk associated with second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” portion of the unitranche loans which account for 5.8% of our portfolio at fair value.

At December 31, 2022, the Company had investments in 85 portfolio companies. The total cost and fair value of the investments were $875,823,177 and $844,733,638, respectively. The composition of our investments as of December 31, 2022 was as follows:

    

Cost

    

Fair Value

Senior Secured – First Lien(1)

$

750,527,999

$

735,555,508

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

69,989,477

45,304,300

Unsecured Debt

 

5,657,964

4,823,898

Equity

 

49,647,737

59,049,932

Total Investments

$

875,823,177

$

844,733,638

(1)Includes unitranche investments, which may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured, as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans. Our unitranche loans may expose us to certain risk associated with second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” portion of the unitranche loans which account for 3.1% of our portfolio at fair value.

The Company’s investment portfolio may contain loans that are in the form of lines of credit or revolving credit facilities, which require the Company to provide funding when requested by portfolio companies in accordance with the terms of the underlying loan agreements. As of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the Company had 58 and 52 of such investments with aggregate unfunded commitments of $29,136,909 and $27,824,917, respectively. The Company maintains sufficient liquidity (through cash on hand and available borrowings under the Credit Facility) to fund such unfunded loan commitments should the need arise.

The aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation and the aggregate cost and fair value of the Company’s portfolio company securities as of September 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 were as follows:

    

September 30, 2023

    

December 31, 2022

Aggregate cost of portfolio company securities

$

941,679,195

$

875,823,177

Gross unrealized appreciation of portfolio company securities

 

35,791,279

 

28,927,746

Gross unrealized depreciation of portfolio company securities

 

(89,804,334)

 

(58,602,607)

Gross unrealized appreciation on foreign currency translations of portfolio company securities

5,881

Gross unrealized depreciation on foreign currency translations of portfolio company securities

(1,333,873)

(1,414,678)

Aggregate fair value of portfolio company securities

$

886,338,148

$

844,733,638

The fair values of our investments disaggregated into the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of significant input used in the valuation as of September 30, 2023 are as follows:

    

Quoted Prices

    

    

    

in Active

Markets

Significant Other

Significant

for Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Securities

Inputs

Inputs

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

Senior Secured – First Lien

$

$

$

793,131,815

$

793,131,815

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

 

 

21,935,000

 

21,935,000

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

5,675,605

 

5,675,605

Equity

 

 

 

65,595,728

 

65,595,728

Total Investments

$

$

$

886,338,148

$

886,338,148

The fair values of our investments disaggregated into the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of significant input used in the valuation as of December 31, 2022 are as follows:

Quoted Prices

    

in Active

    

    

    

Markets

Significant Other

Significant

for Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Securities

Inputs

Inputs

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

Senior Secured – First Lien

$

$

$

735,555,508

$

735,555,508

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

 

 

45,304,300

 

45,304,300

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

4,823,898

 

4,823,898

Equity

 

 

 

59,049,932

 

59,049,932

Total Investments

$

$

$

844,733,638

$

844,733,638

The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments change during the nine months ended September 30, 2023 are as follows:

    

Senior Secured

    

Senior Secured

    

    

    

Loans-First

Loans-Second

Unsecured

 

Lien

Lien

Debt

Equity

Total

Fair value at beginning of period

$

735,555,508

$

45,304,300

$

4,823,898

$

59,049,932

$

844,733,638

Purchases of investments

 

132,330,331

 

 

 

7,320,091

 

139,650,422

Payment-in-kind interest

 

2,268,148

 

 

464,382

 

 

2,732,530

Sales and redemptions

 

(68,327,719)

 

(9,882,105)

 

(211,627)

 

(840,267)

 

(79,261,718)

Realized (losses) gains

 

(870)

 

 

 

657,471

 

656,601

Change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation included in earnings(1)

 

(10,737,043)

 

(13,598,151)

 

587,234

 

(590,235)

 

(24,338,195)

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on foreign currency included in earnings

87,951

 

 

(1,264)

 

86,687

Amortization of premium and accretion of discount, net

 

1,955,509

 

110,956

 

11,718

 

 

2,078,183

Fair value at end of period

$

793,131,815

$

21,935,000

$

5,675,605

$

65,595,728

$

886,338,148

(1)Includes reversal of positions during the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

There were no Level 3 transfers during the nine months ended September 30, 2023.

The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments change during the year ended December 31, 2022 are as follows:

    

Senior Secured

    

Senior Secured

    

    

    

Loans-First

Loans-Second

Unsecured

Lien

Lien

Debt

Equity

Total

Fair value at beginning of period

$

646,352,935

$

56,733,110

$

4,883,854

$

64,903,427

$

772,873,326

Purchases of investments

 

196,925,873

 

4,900,000

 

83,511

 

9,101,485

 

211,010,869

Payment-in-kind interest

 

826,816

 

 

530,361

 

 

1,357,177

Sales and redemptions

 

(98,160,329)

 

(10,809,276)

 

 

(18,873,195)

 

(127,842,800)

Realized (losses) gains

 

(3,929,334)

 

(4,109,525)

 

 

11,811,371

 

3,772,512

Change in unrealized depreciation included in earnings(1)

 

(7,342,462)

 

(1,611,688)

 

(687,778)

 

(7,900,302)

 

(17,542,230)

Change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on foreign currency included in earnings

(1,421,824)

 

 

7,146

 

(1,414,678)

Amortization of premium and accretion of discount, net

 

2,303,833

 

201,679

 

13,950

 

 

2,519,462

Fair value at end of period

$

735,555,508

$

45,304,300

$

4,823,898

$

59,049,932

$

844,733,638

(1)Includes reversal of positions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022.

There were no Level 3 transfers during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022.

The following is a summary of geographical concentration of our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2023:

% of Total

 

Cost

Fair Value

Investments

 

California

 

$

198,435,914

 

$

184,402,328

 

20.79

%

Texas

 

201,784,259

 

177,626,821

 

20.03

%

Florida

 

92,485,850

 

91,929,779

 

10.36

%

Pennsylvania

 

48,566,621

 

48,739,983

 

5.50

%

Illinois

 

58,569,341

 

48,563,654

 

5.48

%

Arizona

 

44,824,896

 

47,215,376

 

5.33

%

Ohio

 

33,229,064

 

35,678,523

 

4.03

%

Wisconsin

 

27,419,166

 

25,307,562

 

2.86

%

Washington

 

24,330,488

 

24,469,868

 

2.76

%

South Carolina

 

23,788,284

 

23,542,129

 

2.66

%

Colorado

 

20,000,928

 

19,434,544

 

2.19

%

Georgia

 

10,180,988

 

18,885,059

 

2.13

%

Maryland

 

16,709,852

 

16,680,941

 

1.88

%

District of Columbia

 

13,903,415

 

14,946,569

 

1.69

%

Indiana

 

14,223,073

 

14,507,297

 

1.64

%

North Carolina

 

13,228,185

 

13,872,575

 

1.57

%

New Jersey

 

11,207,366

 

11,664,087

 

1.32

%

Michigan

 

10,680,111

 

10,680,110

 

1.20

%

Massachusetts

 

10,167,365

 

10,539,949

 

1.19

%

Tennessee

 

9,385,167

 

9,274,348

 

1.05

%

Missouri

 

9,006,651

 

8,998,049

 

1.02

%

Idaho

 

8,874,557

 

8,945,557

 

1.01

%

Canada

 

8,708,104

 

8,766,484

 

0.99

%

New York

 

5,458,393

 

5,654,248

 

0.64

%

Minnesota

 

5,826,223

 

5,587,569

 

0.63

%

United Kingdom

 

20,684,934

 

424,739

 

0.05

%

$

941,679,195

$

886,338,148

 

100.00

%

The following is a summary of geographical concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022:

    

    

    

% of Total

 

Investments

 

Cost

Fair Value

at fair value

 

Texas

 

$

191,422,143

 

$

171,165,597

 

20.26

%

California

 

167,833,384

 

165,340,017

 

19.57

%

Florida

 

60,593,839

 

59,421,775

 

7.03

%

Illinois

 

64,421,998

 

53,218,615

 

6.30

%

Arizona

 

43,129,283

 

44,277,625

 

5.24

%

Pennsylvania

 

42,899,504

 

41,889,344

 

4.96

%

Ohio

 

34,223,452

 

37,333,236

 

4.42

%

Washington

 

28,978,375

 

28,480,471

 

3.37

%

New Jersey

 

25,395,054

 

25,140,343

 

2.98

%

Wisconsin

 

27,533,402

 

24,271,761

 

2.87

%

District of Columbia

 

17,236,556

 

21,124,347

 

2.50

%

Georgia

 

10,919,642

 

19,692,757

 

2.33

%

South Carolina

 

19,089,373

 

18,654,782

 

2.21

%

Maryland

 

16,824,077

 

16,576,554

 

1.96

%

Minnesota

 

16,972,086

 

15,952,072

 

1.89

%

United Kingdom

 

20,530,087

 

14,445,481

 

1.71

%

Colorado

 

15,204,934

 

14,295,470

 

1.69

%

Indiana

 

14,346,082

 

14,245,432

 

1.69

%

Canada

 

13,333,737

 

13,266,669

 

1.57

%

North Carolina

 

10,461,551

 

10,649,232

 

1.26

%

Massachusetts

 

10,215,356

 

10,527,659

 

1.25

%

Idaho

 

9,873,093

 

9,863,103

 

1.17

%

Missouri

 

9,142,111

 

9,656,287

 

1.14

%

New York

 

5,096,152

 

5,096,008

 

0.61

%

Michigan

 

147,906

 

149,001

 

0.02

%

$

875,823,177

$

844,733,638

 

100.00

%

The following is a summary of industry concentration of our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2023:

% of Total

 

Cost

Fair Value

Investments

 

Services: Business

$

194,990,932

$

205,918,323

 

23.24

%

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

 

101,206,823

103,092,547

 

11.63

%

Consumer Goods: Durable

 

58,800,939

53,974,812

 

6.09

%

High Tech Industries

 

51,932,243

51,454,412

 

5.81

%

Consumer Goods: Non-Durable

 

53,777,908

47,396,634

 

5.35

%

Beverage, Food, & Tobacco

 

43,077,877

44,406,932

 

5.01

%

Software

 

40,113,229

40,956,717

 

4.62

%

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

 

38,356,963

39,217,942

 

4.42

%

Capital Equipment

 

37,303,170

38,576,803

 

4.35

%

Services: Consumer

 

50,310,688

32,337,514

 

3.65

%

Construction & Building

 

30,622,390

30,577,354

 

3.45

%

Aerospace & Defense

 

47,005,893

24,062,870

 

2.71

%

Environmental Industries

 

35,547,983

23,613,946

 

2.66

%

Media: Broadcasting & Subscription

 

17,988,173

20,946,799

 

2.36

%

Transportation & Logistics

 

16,689,791

17,185,165

 

1.94

%

Chemicals, Plastics, & Rubber

 

18,354,804

17,040,958

 

1.92

%

Metals & Mining

 

16,612,448

16,585,405

 

1.87

%

Retail

 

14,919,849

14,805,752

 

1.67

%

Containers, Packaging, & Glass

 

17,382,901

14,651,952

 

1.65

%

Automotive

 

11,137,278

11,250,000

 

1.27

%

Utilities: Oil & Gas

 

9,937,449

10,000,000

 

1.13

%

Education

 

10,269,911

9,183,346

 

1.04

%

Media: Diversified & Production

 

5,649,003

5,741,030

 

0.65

%

Finance

 

1,554,039

5,555,214

 

0.63

%

FIRE: Real Estate

 

16,946,623

5,406,899

 

0.61

%

Energy: Oil & Gas

 

1,189,888

1,516,860

 

0.17

%

Hotel, Gaming, & Leisure

 

-

881,962

 

0.10

%

Total

$

941,679,195

$

886,338,148

 

100.00

%

The following is a summary of industry concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022:

    

    

    

% of Total

 

Investments

 

Cost

Fair Value

at fair value

 

Services: Business

$

207,234,534

$

218,866,572

 

25.91

%

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

 

86,469,854

88,103,319

 

10.43

%

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

 

52,830,447

52,525,839

 

6.22

%

Consumer Goods: Non-Durable

 

54,683,102

51,280,593

 

6.07

%

Consumer Goods: Durable

 

45,601,928

44,529,176

 

5.27

%

Aerospace & Defense

 

48,137,394

39,526,086

 

4.68

%

Software

 

37,582,855

37,975,255

 

4.50

%

Capital Equipment

 

33,538,647

33,801,951

 

4.00

%

Beverage, Food, & Tobacco

 

34,000,918

32,755,054

 

3.88

%

Construction & Building

 

26,948,135

26,406,849

 

3.13

%

Environmental Industries

 

27,771,798

26,247,936

 

3.11

%

Services: Consumer

 

43,302,101

24,616,706

 

2.92

%

Media: Broadcasting & Subscription

 

18,615,052

21,445,307

 

2.54

%

Chemicals, Plastics, & Rubber

 

18,487,206

17,903,999

 

2.12

%

Transportation & Logistics

 

16,768,763

17,161,972

 

2.03

%

Metals & Mining

 

16,708,750

16,464,001

 

1.95

%

Containers, Packaging, & Glass

 

17,436,600

13,977,250

 

1.65

%

Retail

 

13,303,536

13,217,256

 

1.56

%

High Tech Industries

 

14,126,954

12,648,347

 

1.50

%

Automotive

 

11,252,581

11,342,751

 

1.34

%

Education

 

11,057,921

10,498,760

 

1.24

%

Utilities: Oil & Gas

 

9,921,469

9,800,000

 

1.16

%

Energy: Oil & Gas

 

7,314,230

7,355,074

 

0.87

%

FIRE: Real Estate

 

15,642,093

5,866,397

 

0.69

%

Media: Diversified & Production

 

5,517,409

5,534,710

 

0.66

%

Finance

 

1,568,900

4,082,579

 

0.48

%

Hotel, Gaming, & Leisure

 

799,899

 

0.09

%

$

875,823,177

$

844,733,638

 

100.00

%

The following provides quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of September 30, 2023:

Description:

    

Fair Value

    

Valuation Technique

    

Unobservable Inputs

    

Range (Average)(1)(3)

First lien debt

$

793,131,815

 

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

-3.40% to 7.20% (-0.43%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

0.00% to 3.97% (0.98%)

 

Market multiples

5.0x to 17.0x (10.5x)(4)

Second lien debt

$

21,935,000

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

-0.74% to 7.97% (1.56%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

0.27% to 1.13% (0.57%)

 

 

Market multiples

5.7x to 10.8x (7.8x)(4)

Unsecured debt

$

5,675,605

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

4.57% to 4.57% (4.57%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

4.39% to 4.39% (4.39%)

 

 

Market multiples

9.3x to 9.3x (9.3x)(4)

Equity investments

$

65,595,728

 

Market approach(5)

 

Underwriting multiple/

 

EBITDA Multiple

1.4x to 24.4x (12.5x)

Total Long Term Level 3 Investments

$

886,338,148

 

  

 

  

  

(1)Weighted average based on fair value as of September 30, 2023.
(2)Included but not limited to (a) the market approach, which is used to determine sufficient enterprise value, and (b) the income approach which is based on discounting future cash flows using an appropriate market yield.
(3)The Company calculates the price of the loan by discounting future cash flows, which include forecasted future BSBY, LIBOR, SOFR, or SONIA rates based on the published forward curve at the valuation date, using an appropriate yield calculated as of the valuation date. This yield is calculated based on the loan’s yield at the original investment and is adjusted as of the valuation date based on: changes in comparable credit spreads, changes in risk free interest rates (per swap rates), and changes in credit quality (via an estimated shadow rating). Significant movements in any of these factors could result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. As an example, the “Range (Average)” for first lien debt instruments in the table above indicates that the change in the HY spreads between the date a loan closed and the valuation date ranged from -3.40% (-340 basis points) to 7.20% (720 basis points). The average of all changes was -0.43% (-43 basis points).
(4)Median of LTM (last twelve months) EBITDA multiples of comparable companies.
(5)The primary significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s equity investments is the EBITDA multiple (the “Multiple”). Significant increases (decreases) in the Multiple in isolation could result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. To determine the Multiple for the market approach, the Company considers current market trading and/or transaction multiple, portfolio company performance (financial ratios) relative to public and private peer companies and leverage levels, among other factors. Changes in one or more of these factors can have a similar directional change on other factors in determining the appropriate Multiple to use in the market approach.

The following provides quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2022:

 

 

Description:

    

Fair Value

    

Valuation Technique

    

Unobservable Inputs

    

Range (Average)(1)(3)

First lien debt

$

735,555,508

 

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

-2.29% to 6.53% (1.52%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

-1.43% to 4.31% (2.31%)

 

Market multiples

4.5x to 19.3x (10.1x)(4)

Second lien debt

$

45,304,300

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

-0.17% to 5.18% (2.39%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

-0.02% to 3.91% (1.94%)

 

 

Market multiples

5.6x to 15.1x (11.4x)(4)

Unsecured debt

$

4,823,898

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

7.97% to 7.97% 7.97%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

3.63% to 3.63% (3.63%)

 

 

Market multiples

9.1x to 9.1x (9.1x)(4)

Equity investments

$

59,049,932

 

Market approach(5)

 

Underwriting multiple/

 

EBITDA Multiple

1.3x to 24.8x (11.7x)

Total Long Term Level 3 Investments

$

844,733,638

 

  

 

  

  

(1)Weighted average based on fair value as of December 31, 2022.
(2)Inclusive of but not limited to (a) the market approach, which is used to determine sufficient enterprise value, and (b) the income approach which is based on discounting future cash flows using an appropriate market yield.
(3)The Company calculates the price of the loan by discounting future cash flows, which include forecasted future LIBOR rates based on the published forward LIBOR curve at the valuation date, using an appropriate yield calculated as of the valuation date. This yield is calculated based on the loan’s yield at the original investment and is adjusted as of the valuation date based on: changes in comparable credit spreads, changes in risk free interest rates (per swap rates), and changes in credit quality (via an estimated shadow rating). Significant movements in any of these factors would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. As an example, the “Range (Average)” for a first lien debt instruments in the table above indicates that the change in the HY spreads between the date a loan closed and the valuation date ranged from -2.29% (-229 basis points) to 6.53% (653 basis points). The average of all changes was 1.52% (152 basis points).
(4)Median of LTM (last twelve months) EBITDA multiples of comparable companies.
(5)The primary significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s equity investments is the EBITDA multiple (the “Multiple”). Significant increases (decreases) in the Multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. To determine the Multiple for the market approach, the Company considers current market trading and/or transaction multiple, portfolio company performance (financial ratios) relative to public and private peer companies and leverage levels, among other factors. Changes in one or more of these factors can have a similar directional change on other factors in determining the appropriate Multiple to use in the market approach.