XML 26 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.4
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE  
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE

NOTE 6 — PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE

In accordance with the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures under U.S. GAAP, the Company discloses the fair value of its investments in a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The guidance establishes three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2 — Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;

Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The level of an asset or liability within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by management.

The Company considers whether the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifies transactions that are not orderly in determining fair value. Accordingly, if the Company determines that either the volume and/or level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased (from normal conditions for that asset or liability) or price quotations or observable inputs are not associated with orderly transactions, increased analysis and management judgment will be required to estimate fair value. Valuation techniques such as an income approach might be appropriate to supplement or replace a market approach in those circumstances.

At December 31, 2022, the Company had investments in 85 portfolio companies. The total cost and fair value of the investments were $875,823,177 and $844,733,638, respectively. The composition of our investments as of December 31, 2022 is as follows:

Cost

Fair Value

Senior Secured – First Lien(1)

$

750,527,999

$

735,555,508

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

69,989,477

45,304,300

Unsecured Debt

 

5,657,964

4,823,898

Equity

 

49,647,737

59,049,932

Total Investments

$

875,823,177

$

844,733,638

(1)Includes unitranche investments, which account for 3.1% of our portfolio at fair value. Unitranche structures may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans. Our unitranche
loans will expose us to the risks associated with the second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” tranche.

At December 31, 2021, the Company had investments in 73 portfolio companies. The total cost and fair value of the investments were $785,005,957 and $772,873,326, respectively. The composition of our investments as of December 31, 2021 was as follows:

    

Cost

    

Fair Value

Senior Secured – First Lien(1)

$

652,561,144

$

646,352,935

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

79,806,598

 

56,733,110

Unsecured Debt

 

5,030,143

 

4,883,854

Equity

 

47,608,072

 

64,903,427

Total Investments

$

785,005,957

$

772,873,326

(1)Includes unitranche investments, which account for 1.6% of our portfolio at fair value. Unitranche structures may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans and our unitranche loans will expose us to the risks associated with the second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” tranche.

The Company’s investment portfolio may contain loans that are in the form of lines of credit or revolving credit facilities, which require the Company to provide funding when requested by portfolio companies in accordance with the terms of the underlying loan agreements. As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company had 52 and 32 such investments with aggregate unfunded commitments of $27,824,917 and $30,982,734, respectively. The Company maintains sufficient liquidity (through cash on hand and available borrowings under the Credit Facility) to fund such unfunded loan commitments should the need arise.

The fair values of our investments disaggregated into the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of significant input used in the valuation as of December 31, 2022 were as follows:

    

Quoted Prices

    

    

    

in Active

Markets

Significant Other

Significant

for Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Securities

Inputs

Inputs

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

Senior Secured – First Lien

$

$

$

735,555,508

$

735,555,508

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

 

 

45,304,300

 

45,304,300

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

4,823,898

 

4,823,898

Equity

 

 

 

59,049,932

 

59,049,932

Total Investments

$

$

$

844,733,638

$

844,733,638

The fair values of our investments disaggregated into the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of significant input used in the valuation as of December 31, 2021 were as follows:

Quoted Prices

    

in Active

    

    

    

Markets

Significant Other

Significant

for Identical

Observable

Unobservable

Securities

Inputs

Inputs

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Total

Senior Secured – First Lien

$

$

$

646,352,935

$

646,352,935

Senior Secured – Second Lien

 

 

 

56,733,110

 

56,733,110

Unsecured Debt

 

 

 

4,883,854

 

4,883,854

Equity

 

 

 

64,903,427

 

64,903,427

Total Investments

$

$

$

772,873,326

$

772,873,326

The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments changed during the year ended December 31, 2022 were as follows:

    

Senior Secured

    

Senior Secured

    

    

    

Loans-First

Loans-Second

Unsecured

 

Lien

Lien

Debt

Equity

Total

Fair value at beginning of period

$

646,352,935

$

56,733,110

$

4,883,854

$

64,903,427

$

772,873,326

Purchases of investments

 

196,925,873

 

4,900,000

 

83,511

 

9,101,485

 

211,010,869

Payment-in-kind interest

 

826,816

 

 

530,361

 

 

1,357,177

Sales and redemptions

 

(98,160,329)

 

(10,809,276)

 

 

(18,873,195)

 

(127,842,800)

Realized (losses) gains

 

(3,929,334)

 

(4,109,525)

 

 

11,811,371

 

3,772,512

Change in unrealized depreciation included in earnings(1)

 

(7,342,462)

 

(1,611,688)

 

(687,778)

 

(7,900,302)

 

(17,542,230)

Change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation on foreign currency included in earnings

(1,421,824)

 

 

7,146

 

(1,414,678)

Amortization of premium and accretion of discount, net

 

2,303,833

 

201,679

 

13,950

 

 

2,519,462

Fair value at end of period

$

735,555,508

$

45,304,300

$

4,823,898

$

59,049,932

$

844,733,638

(1)Includes reversal of positions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022.

There were no Level 3 transfers during the twelve months ended December 31, 2022.

The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments changed during the year ended December 31, 2021 were as follows:

    

Senior Secured

    

Senior Secured

    

    

    

Loans-First

Loans-Second

Unsecured

Lien

Lien

Debt

Equity

Total

Fair value at beginning of period

$

508,673,064

$

70,720,186

$

21,191,245

$

52,840,000

$

653,424,495

Purchases of investments

 

354,637,555

 

965,250

 

11,705,915

 

22,105,811

 

389,414,531

Payment-in-kind interest

 

521,595

 

 

417,435

 

 

939,030

Sales and redemptions

 

(214,319,978)

 

(13,161,428)

 

(29,384,595)

 

(33,210,915)

 

(290,076,916)

Realized gains (losses)

 

1,475,577

 

(1,781,665)

 

 

23,993,443

 

23,687,355

Change in unrealized (depreciation) appreciation included in earnings

(1)

 

(6,821,212)

 

(157,390)

 

875,354

 

(824,912)

 

(6,928,160)

Amortization of premium and accretion of discount, net

 

2,186,334

 

148,157

 

78,500

 

 

2,412,991

Fair value at end of period

$

646,352,935

$

56,733,110

$

4,883,854

$

64,903,427

$

772,873,326

(1)Includes reversal of positions during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021.

There were no Level 3 transfers during the twelve months ended December 31, 2021.

The following is a summary of geographical concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022:

% of Total

 

Cost

Fair Value

Investments

 

Texas

 

$

191,422,143

 

$

171,165,597

 

20.26

%

California

 

167,833,384

 

165,340,017

 

19.57

%

Florida

 

60,593,839

 

59,421,775

 

7.03

%

Illinois

 

64,421,998

 

53,218,615

 

6.30

%

Arizona

 

43,129,283

 

44,277,625

 

5.24

%

Pennsylvania

 

42,899,504

 

41,889,344

 

4.96

%

Ohio

 

34,223,452

 

37,333,236

 

4.42

%

Washington

 

28,978,375

 

28,480,471

 

3.37

%

New Jersey

 

25,395,054

 

25,140,343

 

2.98

%

Wisconsin

 

27,533,402

 

24,271,761

 

2.87

%

District of Columbia

 

17,236,556

 

21,124,347

 

2.50

%

Georgia

 

10,919,642

 

19,692,757

 

2.33

%

South Carolina

 

19,089,373

 

18,654,782

 

2.21

%

Maryland

 

16,824,077

 

16,576,554

 

1.96

%

Minnesota

 

16,972,086

 

15,952,072

 

1.89

%

United Kingdom

 

20,530,087

 

14,445,481

 

1.71

%

Colorado

 

15,204,934

 

14,295,470

 

1.69

%

Indiana

 

14,346,082

 

14,245,432

 

1.69

%

Canada

 

13,333,737

 

13,266,669

 

1.57

%

North Carolina

 

10,461,551

 

10,649,232

 

1.26

%

Massachusetts

 

10,215,356

 

10,527,659

 

1.25

%

Idaho

 

9,873,093

 

9,863,103

 

1.17

%

Missouri

 

9,142,111

 

9,656,287

 

1.14

%

New York

 

5,096,152

 

5,096,008

 

0.61

%

Michigan

 

147,906

 

149,001

 

0.02

%

$

875,823,177

$

844,733,638

 

100.00

%

The following is a summary of geographical concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2021:

    

    

    

% of Total

 

Investments

 

Cost

Fair Value

at fair value

 

California

$

153,793,390

$

157,446,299

 

20.37

%

Texas

 

161,550,893

 

142,657,160

 

18.46

%

Illinois

 

69,780,236

 

71,066,882

 

9.20

%

Pennsylvania

 

42,866,707

 

42,604,002

 

5.51

%

Washington

 

41,067,458

 

40,790,941

 

5.28

%

Ohio

 

36,551,789

 

38,218,517

 

4.94

%

Arizona

 

31,165,320

 

31,117,284

 

4.03

%

New York

 

25,161,998

 

27,334,823

 

3.54

%

Wisconsin

 

25,880,018

 

25,893,643

 

3.35

%

New Jersey

 

25,518,474

 

23,548,670

 

3.05

%

United Kingdom

 

21,320,828

 

19,537,231

 

2.53

%

Georgia

 

11,066,059

 

19,045,442

 

2.46

%

Maryland

16,838,603

16,974,999

2.20

%

Minnesota

15,922,220

15,688,073

2.03

%

Colorado

 

15,151,135

 

14,980,283

 

1.94

%

South Carolina

 

13,270,660

 

13,270,530

 

1.71

%

Canada

 

13,418,371

 

13,265,324

 

1.71

%

Florida

12,966,130

13,220,344

1.71

%

District of Columbia

 

11,798,134

 

13,137,892

 

1.70

%

Missouri

 

9,871,933

 

10,600,866

 

1.37

%

North Carolina

 

10,503,957

 

10,360,521

 

1.34

%

Massachusetts

 

10,281,055

 

10,348,341

 

1.34

%

Puerto Rico

 

8,760,589

 

1,149,047

 

0.15

%

Virginia

 

500,000

 

616,212

 

0.08

%

$

785,005,957

$

772,873,326

 

100.00

%

The following is a summary of industry concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2022:

% of Total

 

Cost

Fair Value

Investments

 

Services: Business

$

207,234,534

$

218,866,572

 

25.91

%

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

 

86,469,854

88,103,319

 

10.43

%

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

 

52,830,447

52,525,839

 

6.22

%

Consumer Goods: Non-Durable

 

54,683,102

51,280,593

 

6.07

%

Consumer Goods: Durable

 

45,601,928

44,529,176

 

5.27

%

Aerospace & Defense

 

48,137,394

39,526,086

 

4.68

%

Software

 

37,582,855

37,975,255

 

4.50

%

Capital Equipment

 

33,538,647

33,801,951

 

4.00

%

Beverage, Food, & Tobacco

 

34,000,918

32,755,054

 

3.88

%

Construction & Building

 

26,948,135

26,406,849

 

3.13

%

Environmental Industries

 

27,771,798

26,247,936

 

3.11

%

Services: Consumer

 

43,302,101

24,616,706

 

2.92

%

Media: Broadcasting & Subscription

 

18,615,052

21,445,307

 

2.54

%

Chemicals, Plastics, & Rubber

 

18,487,206

17,903,999

 

2.12

%

Transportation & Logistics

 

16,768,763

17,161,972

 

2.03

%

Metals & Mining

 

16,708,750

16,464,001

 

1.95

%

Containers, Packaging, & Glass

 

17,436,600

13,977,250

 

1.65

%

Retail

 

13,303,536

13,217,256

 

1.56

%

High Tech Industries

 

14,126,954

12,648,347

 

1.50

%

Automotive

 

11,252,581

11,342,751

 

1.34

%

Education

 

11,057,921

10,498,760

 

1.24

%

Utilities: Oil & Gas

 

9,921,469

9,800,000

 

1.16

%

Energy: Oil & Gas

 

7,314,230

7,355,074

 

0.87

%

FIRE: Real Estate

 

15,642,093

5,866,397

 

0.69

%

Media: Diversified & Production

 

5,517,409

5,534,710

 

0.66

%

Finance

 

1,568,900

4,082,579

 

0.48

%

Hotel, Gaming, & Leisure

 

-

799,899

 

0.09

%

Total

$

875,823,177

$

844,733,638

 

100.00

%

The following is a summary of industry concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2021:

    

    

    

% of Total

 

Investments

 

Cost

Fair Value

at fair value

 

Services: Business

$

167,253,835

$

177,242,299

 

22.93

%

Healthcare & Pharmaceuticals

 

104,933,428

 

99,584,343

 

12.89

%

Aerospace & Defense

 

66,503,939

 

63,467,579

 

8.21

%

Media: Advertising, Printing & Publishing

 

53,136,718

 

51,125,659

 

6.62

%

Media: Broadcasting & Subscription

 

39,319,912

 

42,892,137

 

5.55

%

Consumer Goods: Durable

 

36,216,806

 

36,537,445

 

4.73

%

Beverage, Food, & Tobacco

 

34,089,805

 

33,791,047

 

4.37

%

Consumer Goods: Non-Durable

 

30,597,444

 

29,447,632

 

3.81

%

Construction & Building

 

27,333,360

 

27,282,504

 

3.53

%

Environmental Industries

 

26,826,229

 

26,355,789

 

3.41

%

Software

 

21,498,947

 

23,841,617

 

3.08

%

Services: Consumer

 

40,034,415

 

22,682,119

 

2.93

%

Transportation & Logistics

 

18,583,797

 

18,934,004

 

2.45

%

Containers, Packaging, & Glass

 

17,557,212

 

17,710,907

 

2.29

%

Metals & Mining

 

16,838,603

 

16,974,999

 

2.20

%

FIRE: Real Estate

 

15,694,701

 

15,824,998

 

2.05

%

Chemicals, Plastics, & Rubber

14,638,210

14,288,322

1.85

%

Education

 

11,053,167

 

11,053,167

 

1.43

%

Automotive

 

11,064,612

 

10,800,000

 

1.40

%

Energy: Oil & Gas

 

11,098,912

 

10,461,417

 

1.35

%

Utilities: Oil & Gas

 

9,901,900

 

9,800,000

 

1.27

%

Capital Equipment

 

8,322,806

 

8,182,736

 

1.06

%

Finance

 

2,507,199

 

4,108,356

 

0.53

%

Hotel, Gaming, & Leisure

 

 

484,250

 

0.06

%

$

785,005,957

$

772,873,326

 

100.00

%

The following provides quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2022:

Description:

    

Fair Value

    

Valuation Technique

    

Unobservable Inputs

    

Range (Average)(1)(3)

First lien debt

$

735,555,508

 

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

-2.29% to 6.53% (1.52%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

-1.43% to 4.31% (2.31%)

 

Market multiples

4.5x to 19.3x (10.1x)(4)

Second lien debt

$

45,304,300

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

-0.17% to 5.18% (2.39%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

-0.02% to 3.91% (1.94%)

 

 

Market multiples

5.6x to 15.1x (11.4x)(4)

Unsecured debt

$

4,823,898

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

7.97% to 7.97% 7.97%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

3.63% to 3.63% (3.63%)

 

 

Market multiples

9.1x to 9.1x (9.1x)(4)

Equity investments

$

59,049,932

 

Market approach(5)

 

Underwriting multiple/

 

EBITDA Multiple

1.3x to 24.8x (11.7x)

Total Long Term Level 3 Investments

$

844,733,638

 

  

 

  

  

(1)Weighted average based on fair value as of December 31, 2022.
(2)Inclusive of but not limited to (a) the market approach which is used to determine sufficient enterprise value, and (b) the income approach which is based on discounting future cash flows using an appropriate market yield.
(3)The Company calculates the price of the loan by discounting future cash flows, which include forecasted future BSBY, LIBOR, SOFR, or SONIA rates based on the published forward curve at the valuation date, using an appropriate yield calculated as of the valuation date. This yield is calculated based on the loan’s yield at the original investment and is adjusted as of the valuation date based on: changes in comparable credit spreads, changes in risk free interest rates (per swap rates), and changes in credit quality (via an estimated shadow rating). Significant movements in any of these factors would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. As an example, the “Range (Average)” for a first lien debt instruments in the table above indicates that the change in the HY spreads between the date a loan closed and the valuation date ranged from -2.29% (-229 basis points) to 6.53% (653 basis points). The average of all changes was 1.52% (152 basis points).
(4)Median of LTM (last twelve months) EBITDA multiples of comparable companies.
(5)The primary significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s equity investments is the EBITDA multiple (the “Multiple”). Significant increases (decreases) in the Multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. To determine the Multiple for the market approach, the Company considers current market trading and/or transaction multiple, portfolio company performance (financial ratios) relative to public and private peer companies and leverage levels, among other factors. Changes in one or more of these factors can have a similar directional change on other factors in determining the appropriate Multiple to use in the market approach.

The following provides quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2021:

 

 

Description:

    

Fair Value

    

Valuation Technique

    

Unobservable Inputs

    

Range (Average)(1)(3)

First lien debt

$

646,352,935

Income/Market(2)

HY credit spreads,

-3.93% to 0.48% (-0.24%)

 

approach

 

Risk free rates

-1.95% to 0.86% (-0.05%)

 

Market multiples

4.5x to 25x (11.6x)(4)

Second lien debt

$

56,733,110

Income/Market(2)

 

HY credit spreads,

-2.54% to 0.53% (-0.53%)

 

approach

 

Risk free rates

-1.79% to 0.94% (-0.29%)

 

 

Market multiples

7.1x to 16.4x (12.9x)(4)

Unsecured debt

$

4,883,854

Income/Market

 

HY credit spreads,

0.25% to 0.25% (0.25%)

 

approach(2)

 

Risk free rates

0.75% to 0.75% (0.75%)

 

 

Market multiples

12.4x to 12.4x (12.4x)(4)

Equity investments

$

64,903,427

 

Market approach(5)

 

Underwriting

1.6x to 24.9x (11.5x)

 

EBITDA Multiple

Total Long Term Level 3 Investments

$

772,873,326

 

  

 

  

  

(1)Weighted average based on fair value as of December 31, 2021.
(2)Inclusive of but not limited to (a) the market approach which is used to determine sufficient enterprise value, and (b) the income approach which is based on discounting future cash flows using an appropriate market yield.
(3)The Company calculates the price of the loan by discounting future cash flows, which include forecasted future LIBOR or SOFR rates based on the published forward LIBOR or SOFR curve at the valuation date, using an appropriate yield calculated as of the valuation date. This yield is calculated based on the loan’s yield at the original investment and is adjusted as of the valuation date based on: changes in comparable credit spreads, changes in risk free interest rates (per swap rates), and changes in credit quality (via an estimated shadow rating). Significant movements in any of these factors would result in a significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. As an example, the “Range (Average)” for a first lien debt instruments in the table above indicates that the change in the
HY spreads between the date a loan closed and the valuation date ranged from -3.93% (-393 basis points) to 0.48% (48 basis points). The average of all changes was -0.24% (-24 basis points).
(4)Median of LTM (last twelve months) EBITDA multiples of comparable companies.
(5)The primary significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s equity investments is the EBITDA multiple (the “Multiple”). Significant increases (decreases) in the Multiple in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. To determine the Multiple for the market approach, the Company considers current market trading and/or transaction multiple, portfolio company performance (financial ratios) relative to public and private peer companies and leverage levels, among other factors. Changes in one or more of these factors can have a similar directional change on other factors in determining the appropriate Multiple to use in the market approach.