10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2019

OR

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO

Commission file number: 001-35733

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	45-5146560
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1330 Avenue of the Americas, 38th Floor

New York, New York 10019

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(212) 649-0600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Formed name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Act  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share	SAMG	The Nasdaq Global Market

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, and Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of April 30, 2019 was 8,535,170 and 4,918,545, respectively.

Part I	Financial Information
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	28
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	42
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	42
Part II	Other Information
Item 6.	Exhibits	43

Except where the context requires otherwise and as otherwise set forth herein, in this report, references to the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer to Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (“Silvercrest”) and its consolidated subsidiary, Silvercrest L.P., the managing member of our operating subsidiary (“Silvercrest L.P.” or “SLP”). SLP is a limited partnership whose existing limited partners are referred to in this report as “principals”.

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains, and from time to time our management may make, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may”, “might”, “will”, “should”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue”, the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions, may include projections of our future financial performance, future expenses, anticipated growth strategies, descriptions of new business initiatives and anticipated trends in our business or financial results. These statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections about future events. Important factors that could cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to: incurrence of net losses, fluctuations in quarterly and annual results, adverse economic or market conditions, our expectations with respect to future levels of assets under management, inflows and outflows, our ability to retain clients from whom we derive a substantial portion of our assets under management, our ability to maintain our fee structure, our particular choices with regard to investment strategies employed, our ability to hire and retain qualified investment professionals, the cost of complying with current and future regulation, coupled with the cost of defending ourselves from related investigations or litigation, failure of our operational safeguards against breaches in data security, privacy, conflicts of interest or employee misconduct, our expected tax rate, and our expectations with respect to deferred tax assets, adverse effects of management focusing on implementation of a growth strategy, failure to develop and maintain the Silvercrest brand and other factors disclosed under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 which is accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as required by law.

Part I – Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and par value data)

	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,494	$	69,283
Investments		1,493		1,493
Receivables, net		6,352		8,022
Due from Silvercrest Funds		1,417		1,233
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net		3,262		3,436
Goodwill		27,352		25,168
Operating lease assets		36,150		—
Finance lease assets		180		—
Intangible assets, net		9,545		9,893
Deferred tax asset—tax receivable agreement		11,846		12,206
Prepaid expenses and other assets		3,363		2,629
Total assets	$	146,454	$	133,363
Liabilities and Equity
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	4,903	$	2,947
Accrued compensation		6,368		31,470
Deferred rent		—		7,225
Operating lease liabilities		42,785		—
Finance lease liabilities		183		—
Deferred tax and other liabilities		9,175		9,322
Total liabilities		63,414		50,964
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Equity
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018		—		—
Class A common stock, par value $0.01, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 8,535,170 and 8,518,096 issued and outstanding, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		85		85
Class B common stock, par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 4,918,545 and 4,934,103 issued and outstanding, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		48		48
Additional Paid-In Capital		43,696		43,584
Retained earnings		12,761		12,330
Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s equity		56,590		56,047
Non-controlling interests		26,450		26,352
Total equity		83,040		82,399
Total liabilities and equity	$	146,454	$	133,363

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2019			2018
Revenue
Management and advisory fees	$	21,589		$	23,303
Family office services		983			1,028
Total revenue		22,572			24,331
Expenses
Compensation and benefits		13,363			14,310
General and administrative		5,210			4,727
Total expenses		18,573			19,037
Income before other (expense) income, net		3,999			5,294
Other (expense) income, net
Other (expense) income, net		7			10
Interest income		70			53
Interest expense		(8	)		(16	)
Total other (expense) income, net		69			47
Income before provision for income taxes		4,068			5,341
Provision for income taxes		1,023			1,291
Net income		3,045			4,050
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests		(1,336	)		(1,819	)
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$	1,709		$	2,231
Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.20		$	0.27
Diluted	$	0.20		$	0.27
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		8,519,058			8,187,279
Diluted		8,522,850			8,192,966

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Class A Common Stock Shares		Class A Common Stock Amount		Class B Common Stock Shares			Class B Common Stock Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s Equity			Non- controlling Interest			Total Equity
January 1, 2018		8,142	$	81		5,059		$	49		$	41,606		$	7,359		$	49,095		$	23,024		$	72,119
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2,072	)		(2,072	)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			552			552
Equity-based compensation		—		—		—			—			6			—			6			794			800
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—			2,231			2,231			1,819			4,050
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(8	)		(8	)
Share conversion		117		1		(117	)		(1	)		605			—			605			(605	)		—
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			(14	)		—			(14	)		—			(14	)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.14 per share		—		—		—			—			—			(1,144	)		(1,144	)		—			(1,144	)
March 31, 2018		8,259	$	82		4,942		$	48		$	42,203		$	8,446		$	50,779		$	23,504		$	74,283
January 1, 2019		8,518	$	85		4,934		$	48		$	43,584		$	12,330		$	56,047		$	26,352		$	82,399
Distributions to partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(2,285	)		(2,285	)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			291			291
Equity-based compensation		—		—		—			—			6			—			6			836			842
Issuance of Class B shares		—		—		2			—			—			—			—			20			20
Net Income		—		—		—			—			—			1,709			1,709			1,336			3,045
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement		—		—		—			—			9			—			9			—			9
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			(3	)		(3	)
Share conversion		17		—		(17	)		—			97			—			97			(97	)		—
Dividends paid on Class A common stock - $0.15 per share		—		—		—			—			—			(1,278	)		(1,278	)		—			(1,278	)
March 31, 2019		8,535	$	85		4,919		$	48		$	43,696		$	12,761		$	56,590		$	26,450		$	83,040

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2019			2018
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$	3,045		$	4,050
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Equity-based compensation		842			800
Depreciation and amortization		511			613
Deferred rent		—			1,292
Deferred income taxes		409			130
Tax receivable agreement adjustment		—			474
Non-cash interest on notes receivable from partners		(3	)		(8	)
Cash flows due to changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables and due from Silvercrest Funds		(761	)		(573	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(448	)		(1,679	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		562			134
Accrued compensation		(25,102	)		(20,412	)
Interest payable on notes payable		—			9
Net cash used in operating activities		(20,945	)		(15,170	)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements	$	(218	)	$	(143	)
Acquisition of Neosho Capital, LLC		(399	)		—
Net cash used in investing activities		(617	)		(143	)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Earn-outs paid related to acquisitions completed on or after January 1, 2009	$	(425	)	$	(447	)
Principal payments on financing leases		(30	)		(4	)
Operating lease liabilities		1,500			—
Distributions to partners		(2,285	)		(2,072	)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock		(1,278	)		(1,144	)
Payments from partners on notes receivable		291			552
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,227	)		(3,115	)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(23,789	)		(18,428	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		69,283			53,822
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	45,494		$	35,394

	Three months ended March 31,
	2019		2018
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Net cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	841	$	2,398
Interest		1		3
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-cash Financing and Investing Activities
Recognition of deferred tax assets as a result of share conversions	$	69	$	552
Earnout accrual for acquisition of Neosho Capital, LLC		1,686		—
Assets acquired under finance lease		26		11
Operating lease assets (ASC 842 adoption)		36,150		—
Operating lease liabilities (ASC 842 adoption)		42,785		—
Finance lease assets (ASC 842 adoption)		180		—
Finance lease liabilities (ASC 842 adoption)		183		—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and for the Three Months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share and par value data)

1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (“Silvercrest”), together with its consolidated subsidiary, Silvercrest L.P., a limited partnership, (collectively the “Company”), was formed as a Delaware corporation on July 11, 2011. Silvercrest is a holding company that was formed in order to carry on the business of Silvercrest L.P., the managing member of our operating subsidiary, and its subsidiaries.  Effective on June 26, 2013, Silvercrest became the sole general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and its only material asset is the general partner interest in Silvercrest L.P., represented by 8,535,170 Class A units or approximately 63.3% of the outstanding interests of Silvercrest L.P.  Silvercrest controls all of the businesses and affairs of Silvercrest L.P. and, through Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries, continues to conduct the business previously conducted by these entities prior to the reorganization.  

Silvercrest L.P., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively “SLP”), provides investment management and family office services to individuals and families and their trusts, and to endowments, foundations and other institutional investors primarily located in the United States of America. The business includes the management of funds of funds and other investment funds, collectively referred to as the “Silvercrest Funds”.

Silvercrest L.P. was formed on December 10, 2008 and commenced operations on January 1, 2009.

On March 11, 2004, Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”) acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of James C. Edwards Asset Management, Inc. (“JCE”) and subsequently changed JCE’s name to Silvercrest Financial Services, Inc. (“SFS”). On December 31, 2004, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of the LongChamp Group, Inc. (now SAM Alternative Solutions, Inc.) (“LGI”). Effective March 31, 2005, SLP entered into an Asset Contribution Agreement with and acquired all of the assets, properties, rights and certain liabilities of Heritage Financial Management, LLC (“HFM”). Effective October 3, 2008, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Marathon Capital Group, LLC (“MCG”) through a limited liability company interest purchase agreement dated September 22, 2008. On November 1, 2011, SLP acquired certain assets of Milbank Winthrop & Co. (“Milbank”). On April 1, 2012, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of MW Commodity Advisors, LLC (“Commodity Advisors”). On March 28, 2013, SLP acquired certain assets of Ten-Sixty Asset Management, LLC (“Ten-Sixty”). On June 30, 2015, SLP acquired certain assets of Jamison, Eaton & Wood, Inc. (“Jamison”).  On January 11, 2016, SLP acquired certain assets of Cappiccille & Company, LLC (“Cappiccille”).  On January 15, 2019, SLP acquired certain assets of Neosho Capital LLC (“Neosho”).  See Notes 3, 7 and 8 for additional information related to the acquisition, goodwill and intangible assets arising from these acquisitions.

Tax Receivable Agreement

In connection with the Company’s initial public offering (the “IPO”) and reorganization of SLP that were completed on June 26, 2013, Silvercrest entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “TRA”) with the partners of SLP that requires it to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that it actually realizes (or are deemed to realize in the case of an early termination payment by it, or a change in control) as a result of the increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the TRA, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the TRA.  The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement are a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P.  As of March 31, 2019, this liability is estimated to be $9,063 and is included in deferred tax and other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Silvercrest expects to benefit from the remaining 15% of cash savings realized, if any.

The TRA was effective upon the consummation of the IPO and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless Silvercrest exercises its right to terminate the TRA for an amount based on an agreed upon value of the payments remaining to be made under the agreement. The TRA will automatically terminate with respect to Silvercrest’s obligations to a partner if a partner (i) is terminated for cause, (ii) breaches his or her non-solicitation covenants with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries or (iii) voluntarily resigns or retires and competes with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries in the 12-month period following resignation of employment or retirement, and no further payments will be made to such partner under the TRA.

For purposes of the TRA, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing Silvercrest’s actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there been no increase in its share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of SLP.

5

Estimating the amount of payments that Silvercrest may be required to make under the TRA is imprecise by nature, because the actual increase in its share of the tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:

• the timing of exchanges of Silvercrest’s Class B units for shares of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock—for instance, the increase in any tax deductions will vary depending on the fair market value, which may fluctuate over time, of the depreciable and amortizable assets of SLP at the time of the exchanges;

• the price of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock at the time of exchanges of Silvercrest’s Class B units—the increase in Silvercrest’s share of the basis in the assets of SLP, as well as the increase in any tax deductions, will be related to the price of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock at the time of these exchanges;

• the extent to which these exchanges are taxable—if an exchange is not taxable for any reason (for instance, if a principal who holds Silvercrest’s Class B units exchanges units in order to make a charitable contribution), increased deductions will not be available;

• the tax rates in effect at the time Silvercrest utilizes the increased amortization and depreciation deductions; and

• the amount and timing of Silvercrest’s income—Silvercrest will be required to pay 85% of the tax savings, as and when realized, if any. If Silvercrest does not have taxable income, it generally will not be required to make payments under the TRA for that taxable year because no tax savings will have been actually realized.

In addition, the TRA provides that, upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, Silvercrest’s (or its successors’) obligations with respect to exchanged or acquired Silvercrest Class B units (whether exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would be based on certain assumptions, including that Silvercrest would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the TRA.

Decisions made by the continuing partners of SLP in the course of running Silvercrest’s business, such as with respect to mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes in control, may influence the timing and amount of payments that are received by an exchanging or selling principal under the TRA. For example, the earlier disposition of assets following an exchange or acquisition transaction will generally accelerate payments under the TRA and increase the present value of such payments, and the disposition of assets before an exchange or acquisition transaction will increase an existing owner’s tax liability without giving rise to any rights of a principal to receive payments under the TRA.

Were the IRS to successfully challenge the tax basis increases described above, Silvercrest would not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the TRA. As a result, in certain circumstances, Silvercrest could make payments under the TRA in excess of its actual cash savings in income tax.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Silvercrest and its wholly owned subsidiaries SLP, SAMG LLC, SFS, MCG, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Investors III LLC as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.  All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2018 was derived from the audited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018 or any future period.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial position and results, have been made. The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes should be read together with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

6

The Company evaluates for consolidation those entities it controls through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those Silvercrest Funds over which the general partner or equivalent is presumed to have control, e.g. by virtue of the limited partners not being able to remove the general partner. The initial step in the Company’s determination of whether a fund for which SLP is the general partner is required to be consolidated is assessing whether the fund is a variable interest entity or a voting interest entity.

SLP then considers whether the fund is a voting interest entity (“VoIE”) in which the unaffiliated limited partners have substantive “kick-out” rights that provide the ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause. SLP considers the “kick-out” rights to be substantive if the general partner for the fund can be removed by the vote of a simple majority of the unaffiliated limited partners and there are no significant barriers to the unaffiliated limited partners’ ability to exercise these rights in that among other things, (1) there are no conditions or timing limits on when the rights can be exercised, (2) there are no financial or operational barriers associated with replacing the general partner, (3) there are a number of qualified replacement investment advisors that would accept appointment at the same fee level, (4) each fund’s documents provide for the ability to call and conduct a vote, and (5) the information necessary to exercise the kick-out rights and related vote are available from the fund and its administrator.

If the fund is a variable interest entity, SLP then determines whether it has a variable interest in the fund, and if so, whether SLP is the primary beneficiary. 

During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, each fund is deemed to be a VoIE and neither SLP nor Silvercrest consolidated any of the Silvercrest Funds.

Non-controlling Interest

As of March 31, 2019, Silvercrest holds approximately 63.3% of the economic interests in SLP. Silvercrest is the sole general partner of SLP and, therefore, controls the management of SLP. As a result, Silvercrest consolidates the financial position and the results of operations of SLP and its subsidiaries, and records a non-controlling interest, as a separate component of equity on its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for the remaining economic interests in SLP. The non-controlling interest in the income or loss of SLP is included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a reduction or addition to net income derived from SLP.

Segment Reporting

The Company views its operations as comprising one operating segment. Each of the Company’s acquired businesses has similar economic characteristics and has been or is in the process of being fully integrated. Furthermore, our chief operating decision maker, who is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, monitors and reviews financial information at a consolidated level for assessing operating results and the allocation of resources.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and other income reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, determination of equity-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, determination of the useful lives of long-lived assets and other matters that affect the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Equity Method Investments

Entities and investments, the activities over which the Company exercises significant influence, but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, whereby the Company records its share of the underlying income or losses of these entities. Intercompany profit arising from transactions with affiliates is eliminated to the extent of its beneficial interest. Equity in losses of equity method investments is not recognized after the carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans, has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other funding obligations exist.

7

The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable. The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment when the loss in value is deemed other than temporary. The Company’s equity method investments approximate their fair value at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The fair value of the equity method investments is estimated based on the Company’s share of the fair value of the net assets of the equity method investee. No impairment charges related to equity method investments were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2019 or 2018.

Receivables and Due from Silvercrest Funds

Receivables consist primarily of amounts for management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations and family office service fees due from clients, and are stated as net realizable value. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful receivables based on estimates of expected losses and specific identification of uncollectible accounts. The Company charges actual losses to the allowance when incurred.

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements consist primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment, computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements and are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which for leasehold improvements is the lesser of the lease term or the life of the asset, generally 10 years, and 3 to 7 years for other fixed assets.

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires that the purchase price, including the fair value of contingent consideration, of the acquisition be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is recorded as part of the purchase price when such contingent consideration is not based on continuing employment of the selling shareholders. Contingent consideration that is related to continuing employment is recorded as compensation expense. Payments made for contingent consideration recorded as part of an acquisition’s purchase price are reflected as financing activities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company remeasures the fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period using a probability-adjusted discounted cash flow method based on significant inputs not observable in the market and any change in the fair value from either the passage of time or events occurring after the acquisition date, is recorded in earnings. Contingent consideration payments that exceed the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration are reflected as an operating activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired, including intangibles, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. The Company generally uses valuation specialists to perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These valuations require management to make estimates and assumptions that are critical in determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities. During the measurement period, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Any adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period are recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized and is generally evaluated for impairment using a two-step process that is performed at least annually, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.

The Company accounts for Goodwill under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” which provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment of whether a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less than its carrying value, including goodwill. In performing its qualitative assessment, an entity considers the extent to which adverse events or circumstances identified, such as changes in economic conditions, industry and market conditions or entity specific events, could affect the comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. If an entity concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying amount, the entity is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and, accordingly, measure the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit. The Company utilized this option when performing its annual impairment assessment in 2018 and 2017 and concluded that its single reporting unit’s fair value was more likely than not greater than its carrying value, including goodwill.

8

The Company has one reporting unit at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. No goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The method of amortization is based on the pattern over which the economic benefits, generally expected undiscounted cash flows, of the intangible asset are consumed. Intangible assets for which no pattern can be reliably determined are amortized using the straight-line method. Intangible assets consist primarily of the contractual right to future management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations from customer contracts or relationships.

Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In connection with such review, the Company also reevaluates the periods of depreciation and amortization for these assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value.

Partner Distributions

Partner incentive allocations, which are determined by the general partner, can be formula-based or discretionary. Partner incentive allocations are treated as compensation expense and recognized in the period in which they are earned. In the event there is insufficient distributable cash flow to make incentive distributions, the general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may determine not to make any distributions called for under the partnership agreement. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations is generally allocated to unit holders based on their pro rata ownership.

Redeemable Partnership Units

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP has the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees or (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

SLP also makes distributions to its partners of various nature including incentive payments, profit distributions and tax distributions.  The profit distributions and tax distributions are accounted for as equity transactions.

Class A Common Stock

The Company’s Class A stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. Also, Class A stockholders are entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared by the Company’s board of directors, out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any statutory or contractual restrictions on the payment of dividends and to any restrictions on the payment of dividends imposed by the terms of any outstanding preferred stock. Dividends consisting of shares of Class A common stock may be paid only as follows: (i) shares of Class A common stock may be paid only to holders of shares of Class A common stock and (ii) shares will be paid proportionately with respect to each outstanding share of the Company’s Class A common stock. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to holders of preferred stock having a liquidation preference, if any, the Class A stockholders will be entitled to share ratably in the Company’s remaining assets available for distribution to Class A stockholders. Class B units of SLP held by principals will be exchangeable for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments for share splits, dividends and reclassifications.

Class B Common Stock

Shares of the Company’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, the Company will issue the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of the Company’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by the Company if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP and the terms of the Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Equity Incentive Plan”). The Company’s Class B stockholders will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s Class B stockholders will not participate in any dividends declared by the Company’s board of directors. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of its assets, Class B stockholders only will be entitled to receive the par value of the Company’s Class B common stock.

9

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASC 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers.  The Company has evaluated the impact of ASC 606 on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  The impact of adopting ASC 606 is de minimis to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and recognition of revenue when compared to the prior year revenue recognition accounting guidance. The new revenue standard requires more comprehensive revenue recognition disclosure in the Company’s notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  

The Company generates revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations, and family office services fees. Management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Performance fees and allocations also relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which the Company has a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which the Company has no partnership interest. Management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees and allocations is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

The discretionary investment management agreements for the Company’s separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for the Company’s private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by the Company upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the investors in the private fund that are not affiliated with the Company, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for the private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) terminates, becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of the Company’s investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from the Company to their clients.

The management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of the Company’s assets under management. The assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into the Company’s various investment strategies and the investment performance of its clients’ accounts. In order to increase the Company’s assets under management and expand its business, the Company must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of its target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. The Company’s ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

• the ability to educate the Company’s target clients about the Company’s classic value investment strategies and provide them with exceptional client service;

• the relative investment performance of the Company’s investment strategies, as compared to competing products and market indices;

• competitive conditions in the investment management and broader financial services sectors;

• investor sentiment and confidence; and

• the decision to close strategies when the Company deems it to be in the best interests of its clients.

The majority of management and advisory fees that the Company earns on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of the management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. The Company’s basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is generally: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance and (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65%. The Company’s fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of the Company’s clients pay a blended fee rate since they are invested in multiple strategies.

10

Management fees earned on investment funds that the Company advises are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For the Company’s private fund clients, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which the Company performs risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

The Company’s management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

• changes in assets under management due to appreciation or depreciation of its investment portfolios, and the levels of the contribution and withdrawal of assets by new and existing clients;

• allocation of assets under management among its investment strategies, which have different fee schedules;

• allocation of assets under management between separately managed accounts and advised funds, for which the Company generally earns lower overall management and advisory fees; and

• the level of their performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees.

The Company’s performance fees and allocations may fluctuate based on performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees and allocations.

The Company’s family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to its clients. The Company’s dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration and consolidated wealth reporting among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom the Company performs these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

The Company accounts for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606 by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. The Company records performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue once the performance fee or allocation, as applicable, has crystalized. As a result, there is no estimate or variability in the consideration when revenue is recorded.

Transition approach

The Company utilized the modified cumulative effect method as part its adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company recognized the modified cumulative effective of initially applying ASU 2014-09 as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application. As stated above, the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 was immaterial.  This method was applied to either incomplete contracts the revenue of which had not been recognized in accordance with prior revenue guidance as of the date of initial application or all contracts as of, and new contracts after, the date of initial application. As of December 31, 2017, all revenue recognized was for complete contracts of revenue. As a result, there was no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of adoption, which was January 1, 2018.

Equity-Based Compensation

Equity-based compensation cost relating to the issuance of share-based awards to employees is based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant, which is expensed ratably over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may affect the timing of the total amount of expense recognized over the vesting period. The service period is the period over which the employee performs the related services, which is normally the same as the vesting period. Equity-based awards that do not require future service are expensed immediately. Equity-based awards that have the potential to be settled in cash at the election of the employee or prior to the reorganization related to redeemable partnership units are classified as liabilities (“Liability Awards”) and are adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

11

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (“ROU”) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the consolidated statement of operations.

The new standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and the Company adopted this standard on this date. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) the effective date of the standard or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. The Company elected to use the effective date as its date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods prior to January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients as part of transition accounting. The Company expects to elect the “package of practical expedients”, which allows the Company to avoid reassessing its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs under the new standard. The Company does not expect to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements as these are not applicable to the Company.

This standard had a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The most significant changes relate to (1) the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for its office equipment and real estate operating leases and (2) providing significant new disclosures about the Company’s leasing activities.

Upon adoption, the Company recognized additional operating liabilities of approximately $44.0 million, with corresponding ROU and other assets based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under current leasing standards for existing operating leases.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting for leases. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for office equipment leases. For those current and prospective leases that qualify as short-term, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

Income Taxes

Silvercrest and SFS are subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which requires an asset and liability approach to the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. SLP is not subject to federal and state income taxes, since all income, gains and losses are passed through to its partners. SLP is, however, subject to New York City unincorporated business tax. With respect to the Company’s incorporated entities, the annual tax rate is based on the income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Judgment is required in determining the tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. The tax effects of any uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns are recognized only if it is “more likely-than-not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest and penalties related to UTPs in income tax expense.

The Company recognizes the benefit of a UTP in the period when it is effectively settled. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination.

12

Recent Accounting Developments

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments—Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." Although the ASU retains many current requirements, it significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.  Some of the amendments in ASU 2016-01 include the following: (1) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (3) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; and (4) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value, among others. ASU 2016-01 became effective on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Accounting for Credit Losses” which amends the Board’s guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The ASU adds to U.S. GAAP an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. This amendment is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Cash Flow Classification” which amends the guidance in ASC 230 on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Restricted Cash” which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during a reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, The FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 85): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”.  The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.  ASU 2017-01 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2019 and interim reporting periods within that year.  Early adoption is permitted for transactions that have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.  The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, The FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”.  ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing.  An entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination.  Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value.  The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  An entity has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.  ASU 2017-04 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2021 and interim reporting periods within that year.  Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.  The Company expects the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”.  The ASU conforms the derecognition guidance on nonfinancial assets with the model for transactions in the new revenue standard (ASC 606, as amended).  Subtopic 610-20 was issued as part of the new revenue standard. It provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers. The new guidance defines “in substance nonfinancial assets,” unifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets, eliminates rules specifically addressing sales of real estate, removes exceptions to the financial asset derecognition model, and clarifies the accounting for contributions of nonfinancial assets to joint ventures. This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

13

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 “Compensation – Stock”.  The ASU amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements.  The ASU provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718.  Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification.  This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract.” The ASU provides guidance for entities to evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement which includes a software license. ASU 2018-15 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company expects the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the SEC issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification. The rule amends certain disclosure requirements that have become redundant, overlapping, outdated or superseded. The rule became effective for the Company’s current quarterly report, with the ability to adopt the changes in the current period, or defer until 2019.  The Company elected to defer the changes to the interim period disclosure rules related to changes to shareholders’ equity until its first quarter report in 2019.

3. ACQUISITIONS

Neosho:

On December 13, 2018, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Neosho Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Neosho” or the “Seller”), and Christopher K. Richey, Alphonse I. Chan, Robert K. Choi and Vincent G. Pandes, each such individual a principal of Neosho (together, the “Principals of Neosho”), to acquire certain assets of Neosho.  The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 15, 2019 and is referred to herein as the “Neosho Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of investment management and advisory services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) a cash payment of $399 (net of cash acquired) and (2) Class B units of SLP issued to the Principals of Neosho with a value equal to $20 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,686, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved.  SAMG LLC will make a payment of $300 to the Principals of Neosho on the first anniversary of the closing date.  SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Neosho as soon as practicable following December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $100,000 and (ii) the product obtained by multiplying (x) 50% by (y) the revenue of Neosho as of such payment date less the revenue of Neosho as of the immediately preceding payment date for the prior year.   Earnout payments will be paid 75% in cash and 25% in equity.  The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

The Company has a liability of $1,686 related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Neosho Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2019 for contingent consideration.

Cappiccille:

On December 15, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Cappiccille & Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Cappiccille” or the “Seller”), and Michael Cappiccille (the “Principal”), to acquire certain assets of Cappiccille.  The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 11, 2016 and is referred to herein as the “Cappiccille Acquisition”.

14

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of tax services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets, and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principal. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of a cash payment of $148. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $354, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved.  SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principal as soon as practicable following December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and during 2020, in an amount equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the business and assets of Cappiccille, based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2016 shall be equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille for the period between the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition and December 31, 2016 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille Acquisition for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition.  The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

The Company has a liability of $126 and $231 related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Cappiccille Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, for contingent consideration.  

Jamison:

On March 30, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Jamison Eaton & Wood, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (“Jamison” or the “Seller”), and Keith Wood, Ernest Cruikshank, III, William F. Gadsden and Frederick E. Thalmann, Jr., each such individual a principal of Jamison (together, the “Principals of Jamison”), to acquire certain assets of Jamison.  The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on June 30, 2015 and is referred to herein as the “Jamison Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, an investment adviser, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets, and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principals of Jamison. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principals of Jamison an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) cash payments in the aggregate amount of $3,550 (the “Closing Cash Payment”), (2) a promissory note issued to the Seller in the principal amount of $394, with an interest rate of 5% per annum (the “Seller Note”), (3) promissory notes in varying amounts issued to each of the Principals of Jamison for an aggregated total amount of $1,771, each with an interest rate of 5% per annum (together, the “Principals of Jamison Notes”) and (4) Class B units of SLP (the “Class B Units”) issued to the Principals of Jamison with a value equal to $3,562 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest (together, the “Equity Consideration”). The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,429, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved.  SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Jamison as soon as practicable following December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and during 2020, in an amount equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the business and assets of Jamison (the “Jamison Business”), based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2015 shall be equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition and December 31, 2015 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition.  The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected EBITDA for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected EBITDA was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.  

The Company has a liability of $204 and $524 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Jamison Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for contingent consideration.

15

In connection with their receipt of the Equity Consideration, the Principals of Jamison became subject to the rights and obligations set forth in the limited partnership agreement of SLP and are entitled to distributions consistent with SLP’s distribution policy.  In addition, the Principals of Jamison became parties to the Exchange Agreement, which governs the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company, the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement, which provides the Principals of Jamison with liquidity with respect to shares of Class A common stock of the Company received in exchange for Class B Units, and the TRA of the Company, which entitles the Principals of Jamison to share in a portion of the tax benefit received by the Company upon the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company.

The Asset Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.

The strategic acquisition of Jamison, a long-standing and highly regarded investment boutique, strengthened the Company’s presence in the greater New York market and the Company gained investment managers that have significantexperience and knowledge of the industry.  Jamison’s clients gained access to the Company’s complete investment management, wealth planning and reporting capabilities, including proprietary value equity and fixed income disciplines and alternative investment advisory services.

The Company believes the recorded goodwill is supported by the anticipated revenues and expected synergies of integrating the operations of Jamison into the Company.  The goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

4.INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Investments

Investments include $1,493 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, representing the Company’s interests in the Silvercrest Funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates. The Company’s financial interest in these funds can range in amounts up to 2% of the net assets of the funds. Despite the Company’s insignificant financial interest, the Company applies the equity method to account for its interests in affiliated investment funds because it exercises significant influence over these funds as the Company typically serves as the general partner, managing member or equivalent for these funds. During 2007, the Silvercrest Funds granted rights to the unaffiliated investors in each respective fund to provide that a simple majority of the fund’s unaffiliated investors will have the right, without cause, to remove the general partner or equivalent of that fund or to accelerate the liquidation date of that fund in accordance with certain procedures. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company determined that none of the Silvercrest Funds were required to be consolidated.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment, the characteristics specific to the investment and the state of the marketplace including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in an orderly market generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

• Level I: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The type of investments in Level I include listed equities and listed derivatives.

• Level II: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Investments which are generally included in Level II include corporate bonds and loans, less liquid and restricted equity securities, certain over-the counter derivatives, and certain fund of hedge funds investments in which the Company has the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date.

• Level III: Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Investments that are included in Level III generally include general and limited partnership interests in private equity and real estate funds, credit-oriented funds, certain over-the-counter derivatives, funds of hedge funds which use net asset value per share to determine fair value in which the Company may not have the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date, distressed debt and non-investment grade residual interests in securitizations and collateralized debt obligations.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given investment is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.

16

At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, financial instruments that are not held at fair value are categorized in the table below:

	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value Hierarchy
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,494	$	45,494	$	69,283	$	69,283		Level I	(1)
Investments	$	1,493	$	1,493	$	1,493	$	1,493		N/A	(2)

(1) Includes $17,307 and $17,200 of cash equivalents at March 31,2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, that fall under Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

(2) Investments consist of the Company’s equity method investments in affiliated investment funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates.  Fair value of investments is based on the net asset value of the affiliated investment funds which is a practical expedient for fair value, which is not included in the fair value hierarchy under GAAP.

(3) The carrying value of notes payable and borrowings under the revolving credit agreement approximates fair value, which is determined based on interest rates currently available to the Company for similar debt.

5. RECEIVABLES, NET

The following is a summary of receivables as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Management and advisory fees receivable	$	3,843		$	3,358
Unbilled receivables		3,128			3,036
Other receivables		2			2,249
Receivables		6,973			8,643
Allowance for doubtful receivables		(621	)		(621	)
Receivables, net	$	6,352		$	8,022

6. FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, NET

The following is a summary of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Leasehold improvements	$	5,285		$	5,229
Furniture and equipment		5,458			6,022
Artwork		485			483
Total cost		11,228			11,734
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(7,966	)		(8,298	)
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	3,262		$	3,436

Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $163 and $188, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company wrote off leased assets of $310 that were fully depreciated as of March 31, 2019.  

17

7. GOODWILL

The following is a summary of the changes to the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Beginning
Gross balance	$	42,583		$	42,583
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance		25,168			25,168
Acquisition of Neosho		2,184			─
Ending
Gross balance		44,767			42,583
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance	$	27,352		$	25,168

8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

The following is a summary of intangible assets as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	Customer Relationships			Other Intangible Assets			Total
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Balance, March 31, 2019		22,560			2,467			25,027
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2019		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Amortization expense		(308	)		(40	)		(348	)
Balance, March 31, 2019		(13,195	)		(2,287	)		(15,482	)
Net book value	$	9,365		$	180		$	9,545
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2018	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Balance, December 31, 2018		22,560			2,467			25,027
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2018		(11,367	)		(2,082	)		(13,449	)
Amortization expense		(1,520	)		(165	)		(1,685	)
Balance, December 31, 2018		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Net Book Value	$	9,673		$	220		$	9,893

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $348 and $425 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Amortization related to the Company’s finite life intangible assets is scheduled to be expensed over the next five years and thereafter as follows:

2019 (remainder of)	$	1,042
2020		1,299
2021		1,196
2022		1,142
2023		983
Thereafter		3,883
Total	$	9,545

18

9. DEBT

Credit Facility

On June 24, 2013, the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. entered into a $15.0 million credit facility with City National Bank. The subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. are the borrowers under such facility and Silvercrest L.P. guarantees the obligations of its subsidiaries under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by certain assets of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. The credit facility consists of a $7.5 million delayed draw term loan that matures on June 24, 2025 and a $7.5 million revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on December 21, 2018.  On June 22, 2018, the revolving credit facility was extended to June 21, 2019.   The loan bears interest at either (a) the higher of the prime rate plus a margin of 0.05 percentage points and 2.5% or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 3 percentage points, at the borrowers’ option.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, no amount has been drawn on the term loan credit facility.  On June 22, 2018, the term loan was amended to extend the draw date to June 25, 2023 and to extend the maturity date to June 24, 2025. The borrowers are able to draw up to the full amount of the term loan through June 25, 2023. Borrowings under the term loan on or prior to June 24, 2020 are payable in 20 equal quarterly installments.  Borrowings under the term loan after June 24, 2020 will be payable in equal quarterly installments through the maturity date. The credit facility contains restrictions on, among other things, (i) incurrence of additional debt, (ii) creating liens on certain assets, (iii) making certain investments, (iv) consolidating, merging or otherwise disposing of substantially all of our assets, (v) the sale of certain assets, and (vi) entering into transactions with affiliates. In addition, the credit facility contains certain financial covenants including a test on discretionary assets under management, maximum debt to EBITDA and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The credit facility contains customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change in control which includes a person or group of persons acting together acquiring more than 30% of the total voting securities of Silvercrest.

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

Interest expense, which also includes amortization of deferred financing fees, incurred on the revolving credit facility and term loan for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $7 and $4, respectively.

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

The Company leases office space pursuant to operating leases that are subject to specific escalation clauses. Rent expense charged to operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $1,529 and $1,511, respectively. The Company received sub-lease income from sub-tenants during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 of $32 and $75, respectively. Therefore, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, net rent expense amounted to $1,497 and $1,436, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As security for performance under the leases, the Company is required to maintain letters of credit in favor of the landlord totaling $506 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.  Furthermore, the Company maintains an $80 letter of credit in favor of its Boston landlord. Both are collateralized by the Company’s revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

In March 2014, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office space in Richmond, VA.  The lease commenced on May 1, 2014 and expires July 31, 2019. The lease is subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-free period of three months.  Monthly rent expense is $5.  The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $3.  In September 2016, the Company entered into Lease Amendment Number One (“Amendment Number One”) to expand its space and extend its lease.  This expansion was to occur on or about October 1, 2017, and the lease was extended to November 30, 2024.  The lease was further amended on January 16, 2018 (“Amendment Number Two”) to update the expansion date to January 12, 2018 and to extend the term of the lease to November 30, 2028.  The amended lease provides for a rent credit of $40.  Monthly rent expense under the amended lease is $10.

In June 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Charlottesville, VA.  The lease commenced on June 30, 2015 and expired on June 30, 2018.  The Company extended this lease for one year, with the new term beginning on July 1, 2018 and expiring on June 30, 2019.  Monthly rent expense is $2.  The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $2.

In connection with the Jamison Acquisition, the Company assumed lease agreements for office space in Bedminster and Princeton, NJ.  The Bedminster lease, as extended, expires on March 31, 2022.  Monthly rent expense on this lease is $11.  The Princeton lease, as extended, expired on April 30, 2016.  Monthly rent expense on this lease was $5.  Both leases are subject to escalation clauses, and the Bedminster lease provides for a rent-free period of four months.

In December 2015, the Company extended its lease related to its New York City office space.  The amended lease commenced on October 1, 2017 and expires on September 30, 2028.  The lease is subject to escalation clauses, and provides for a rent-free period of twelve months and for tenant improvements of up to $2,080.  Monthly rent under this extension is $446.

19

In January 2016, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Princeton, NJ.  The lease commenced April 23, 2016 and expires on August 31, 2022.  This lease replaces the Princeton lease discussed above that expired on April 30, 2016.  Monthly rent expense on this lease is $6.  The lease is subject to escalation clauses, and provides for a rent-free period of five months.

With the Cappiccille Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in Livingston, NJ.  The lease is month-to-month.  Monthly rent expense is $2.

In January 2018, the Company extended its lease related to its Boston, MA office space.  The amended lease commenced on January 1, 2018 and expires on April 30, 2023.  The lease provides for a rent-free period of one month.  Monthly rent under this extension is $33.

With the Neosho Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in La Jolla, CA.  The lease expires January 31, 2020.  Monthly rent expense is $3.

Future minimum lease payments and rentals under lease agreements which expire through 2028 are as follows:

	Minimum Lease Commitments		Non-cancellable Subleases			Minimum Net Rentals
Remainder of 2019	$	4,657	$	(55	)	$	4,602
2020		6,183		(34	)		6,149
2021		6,193		(35	)		6,158
2022		6,076		(35	)		6,041
2023		5,770		(6	)		5,764
Thereafter		27,827		—			27,827
Total	$	56,706	$	(165	)	$	56,541
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (months)							111.1
Weighted-average discount rate							4.3	%

The Company has finance leases for certain office equipment. The Company entered into a finance lease agreement for a telephone system during 2014.  The amount financed was $321 and the lease has a term of five years, which began on March 1, 2014.   Monthly minimum lease payments were $5, and continued through November 30, 2018.   On June 30, 2015, the Company assumed certain finance leases for equipment totaling $253 as part of the Jamison Acquisition.  In July 2015, the Company entered into a finance lease for a copier.  The amount financed was $21 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on July 1, 2015.  Monthly minimum lease payments were $1, and continued through June 30, 2018.  In October 2015, the Company entered in a finance lease for a copier.  The amount financed was $18 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on November 1, 2015.  Monthly minimum lease payments were $1, and continued through October 31, 2018.  In January 2017, the Company entered into a finance lease agreement for a copier.  The amount financed was $11 and the lease has a term of two years, which began on January 1, 2017.  Monthly minimum lease payments were $1, and continued through December 31, 2018.  In January 2017, the Company entered into a finance lease agreement for two copiers.  The amount financed was $152 and the lease has a term of five years, which began on February 1, 2017.  Monthly minimum lease payments are $3, and continue through January 31, 2022.  In July 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement for four copiers.  The amount financed was $72 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on July 1, 2017.  Monthly minimum lease payments are $2, and continue through June 30, 2020.  In March 2018, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a copier.  The amount financed was $11 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on March 1, 2018.  Monthly minimum lease payments are $0.3, and continue through February 28, 2021. The aggregate principal balance of finance leases was $182 and $188 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The assets relating to finance leases that are included in equipment as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Finance lease assets included in furniture and equipment	$	588		$	605
Finance lease assets included in software		—			58
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(408	)		(462	)
	$	180		$	201

Depreciation expense relating to finance lease assets was $31 and $21 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  

20

Future minimum lease payments under finance leases are as follows:

	Future Minimum Lease Commitments
Remainder of 2019	$	67
2020		75
2021		37
2022		3
2023		—
Total	$	182
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases (months)		27.1
Weighted-average discount rate		4.0	%

11. EQUITY

SLP historically made, and will continue to make, distributions of its net income to the holders of its partnership units for income tax purposes as required under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement and also made, and will continue to make, additional distributions of net income under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement.  Partnership distributions totaled $2,285 and $2,072, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  

Pursuant to SLP’s Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, partner incentive allocations are treated as distributions of net income. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations was generally allocated to the partners based on their pro rata ownership. Net income allocation is subject to the recovery of the allocated losses of prior periods. Distributions of partner incentive allocations of net income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $27,199 and $24,935, respectively. The distributions are included in non-controlling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.  The Company treats SLP’s partner incentive allocations as compensation expense and accrues such amounts when earned.  During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, SLP accrued partner incentive allocations of $5,178 and $6,763, respectively.      

Silvercrest—Equity

Silvercrest has the following authorized and outstanding equity:

	Shares at March 31, 2019
	Authorized		Outstanding		Voting Rights	Economic Rights
Common shares
Class A, par value $0.01 per share		50,000,000		8,535,170	1 vote per share (1), (2)	All (1), (2)
Class B, par value $0.01 per share		25,000,000		4,918,545	1 vote per share (3), (4)	None (3), (4)
Preferred shares
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share		10,000,000		—	See footnote (5) below	See footnote (5) below

(1) Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Class A common stockholders have 100% of the rights of all classes of Silvercrest’s capital stock to receive dividends.

(2) During 2016, Silvercrest granted 10,582 restricted stock units which will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest, of which 3,791 remain unvested as of March 31, 2019.

(3) Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share.

(4) Each Class B unit of SLP held by a principal is exchangeable for one share of the Company’s Class A common stock. The principals collectively hold 4,918,545 Class B units, which represent the right to receive their proportionate share of the distributions made by SLP, and 243,523 restricted stock units which will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP.  The 243,523 restricted stock units which have been issued to our principals entitle the holders thereof to participate in distributions from SLP as if the underlying Class B units are outstanding and thus are taken into account to determine the economic interest of each holder of units in SLP. However, because the Class B units underlying the restricted stock units have not been issued and are not deemed outstanding, the holders of restricted stock units have no voting rights with respect to those Class B units. Silvercrest will not issue shares of Class B common stock in respect of restricted stock units of SLP until such time that the underlying Class B units are issued.

(5) Silvercrest’s board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock in one or more classes or series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and related restrictions, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any class or series, or the designation of the class or series, without the approval of its stockholders.

21

Silvercrest is dependent on cash generated by SLP to fund any dividends. Generally, SLP will distribute its profits to all of its partners, including Silvercrest, based on the proportionate ownership each holds in SLP. Silvercrest will fund dividends to its stockholders from its proportionate share of those distributions after provision for its income taxes and other obligations.

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, Silvercrest issued the following shares:

Class A Common Stock

	Transaction	# of
	Date	Shares
Class A common stock outstanding - January 1, 2019			8,518,096
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March 2019		17,074
Class A common shares outstanding – March 31, 2019			8,535,170

Class B Common Stock

	Transaction	# of
	Date	Shares
Class B common stock outstanding - January 1, 2019			4,934,103
Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Neosho Acquisition	January 2019		1,516
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March 2019		(17,074	)
Class B common shares outstanding – March 31, 2019			4,918,545

In January 2019, the Company issued 1,516 shares of Class B common stock to certain Principals of Neosho in connection with the Neosho Acquisition.

In March 2019, the Company redeemed from certain existing partners 17,074 shares of Class B common stock in connection with the exchange of a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the resale and registration rights agreement between the Company and its principals.

The total amount of shares of Class B common stock outstanding and held by principals equals the number of Class B units those individuals hold in SLP. Shares of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, Silvercrest will issue to the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by Silvercrest if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP, the terms of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan of Silvercrest, or otherwise.

12. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM PARTNERS

Partner contributions to SLP are made in cash, in the form of five or six year interest-bearing promissory notes and/or in the form of nine year interest-bearing limited recourse promissory notes. Limited recourse promissory notes were issued in January 2008 and August 2009 with interest rates of 3.53% and 2.77%, respectively. The recourse limitation includes a stated percentage of the initial principal amount of the limited recourse note plus a stated percentage of the accreted principal amount as of the date upon which all amounts due are paid in full plus all costs and expenses required to be paid by the borrower and all amounts required to be paid pursuant to a pledge agreement associated with each note issued. Certain notes receivable are payable in annual installments and are collateralized by SLP’s units that are purchased with the note. Notes receivable from partners are reflected as a reduction of non-controlling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

22

Notes receivable from partners are as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Beginning balance	$	924		$	1,918
New note receivable issued to partners					100
Repayment of notes		(291	)		(1,119	)
Interest accrued and capitalized on notes receivable		3			25
Ending balance	$	636		$	924

Full recourse notes receivable from partners as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are $636 and $924, respectively. There were no limited recourse notes receivable from partners as of March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018. There is no allowance for credit losses on notes receivable from partners as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the first three months of 2019 and 2018, the Company provided services to the following, which operate as feeder funds investing through master-feeder or mini-master feeder structures:

• the domesticated Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund, L.P. (formed in 2011 and formerly Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund),

• Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund (International), Ltd. (which invests through Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund, L.P.),

• the domesticated Silvercrest Emerging Markets Fund, L.P. (formed in 2011 and formerly Silvercrest Emerging Markets Fund),

• Silvercrest Market Neutral Fund (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Market Neutral Fund (International) (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Master Fund LLC,

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio A LLC,

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio P LLC,

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio S LLC (formed in 2015),

• the Silvercrest Jefferson Fund, L.P. (formed in 2014), and

• the Silvercrest Jefferson Fund, Ltd. (the Company took over as investment manager in 2014, formerly known as the Jefferson Global Growth Fund, Ltd.), which invests in Silvercrest Jefferson Master Fund, L.P. (formed in 2014).

The Company also provides services to the following, which operate and invest separately as stand-alone funds:

• the Silvercrest Global Opportunities Fund, L.P. (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Global Opportunities Fund (International), Ltd. (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Municipal Special Situations Fund LLC (merged into Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio S LLC in 2015),

• Silvercrest Municipal Special Situations Fund II LLC (merged into Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio S LLC in 2015),

• Silvercrest Select Growth Equity Fund, L.P. (liquidated as of December 31, 2015),

• Silvercrest International Fund, L.P. (previously known as Silvercrest Global Fund, L.P.),

• Silvercrest Small Cap Fund, L.P. (liquidated as of December 31, 2016),

• Silvercrest Special Situations Fund, L.P., and

• Silvercrest Commodity Strategies Fund, L.P. (liquidated as of December 31, 2017).

Pursuant to agreements with the above entities, the Company provides investment advisory services and receives an annual management fee of 0% to 1.75% of assets under management and a performance fee or allocation of 0% to 10% of the above entities’ net appreciation over a high-water mark.

23

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company earned from the above activities management fee income, which is included in “Management and advisory fees” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, of $1,263 and $1,589, respectively.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company was owed $1,417 and $1,233, respectively, from its various funds, which is included in Due from Silvercrest Funds on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company earned management and advisory fees of $291 and $298, respectively, from assets managed on behalf of certain of its employees.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company is owed approximately $3 and $3 from certain of its employees, which is included in Receivables, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

14. INCOME TAXES

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had net deferred tax assets of $11,753, which is recorded as a deferred tax asset of $11,846 specific to Silvercrest which consists primarily of assets related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets related to its acquisition of partnership units of SLP, a deferred tax asset of $5 specific to SLP which consists primarily of assets related to deferred rent expenses offset in part by amounts for differences in the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets and a deferred tax liability of $88 related to the corporate activity of SFS which is primarily related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets.  Of the total net deferred taxes at March 31, 2019, $35 of the net deferred tax liabilities relate to non-controlling interests. These amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other assets and deferred tax and other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition, respectively.      

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $12,093, which is recorded as a net deferred tax asset of $12,206 specific to Silvercrest, which consists primarily of net assets related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangibles related to its acquisition of partnership units of SLP, a net deferred tax liability of $20 specific to SLP which consists primarily of liabilities related to differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets, and a net deferred tax liability of $93 related to the corporate activity of SFS which is primarily related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets.  

The current tax expense was $614 and $1,161 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of the amount for the three months ended March 31, 2019, $182 relates to Silvercrest’s corporate tax expense, $431 relates to SLP’s state and local liability and $1 relates to SFS’s corporate tax expense.  The deferred tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $409 and $130, respectively.  When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is $1,023 and $1,291, respectively.  There was no material discrete tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

The current tax expense decreased from the comparable period in 2018 mainly due to decreased profitability and favorable timing differences related to various deferred assets recorded at SLP.

Of the total current tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, $163 and $228, respectively, relates to non-controlling interests.  Of the deferred tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, ($7) and ($16), respectively, relates to non-controlling interests.  When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 related to non-controlling interests is $156 and $212, respectively.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by federal, state, and local tax regulators. As of March 31, 2019, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 2015 through 2019 are open under the normal three-year statute of limitations and therefore subject to examination.

The guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company does not believe that it has any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months.  Furthermore, the Company does not have any material uncertain tax positions at March 31, 2019 and 2018.

24

15. REDEEMABLE PARTNERSHIP UNITS

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP would have the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees and (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

16. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options

On November 2, 2012, the Company’s board of directors adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

A total of 1,687,500 shares were originally reserved and available for issuance under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2019, 584,679 shares are available for grant. The equity interests may be issued in the form of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B units of SLP. (All references to units or interests of SLP refer to Class B units of SLP and accompanying shares of Class B common stock of Silvercrest).

The purposes of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan are to (i) align the long-term financial interests of our employees, directors, consultants and advisers with those of our stockholders; (ii) attract and retain those individuals by providing compensation opportunities that are consistent with our compensation philosophy; and (iii) provide incentives to those individuals who contribute significantly to our long-term performance and growth. To accomplish these purposes, the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of units of SLP. The 2012 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance-based stock awards and other stock-based awards (collectively, stock awards) based on our Class A common stock. Awards may be granted to employees, including officers, members, limited partners or partners who are engaged in the business of one or more of our subsidiaries, as well as non-employee directors and consultants.

The Compensation Committee may impose vesting conditions and awards may be forfeited if the vesting conditions are not met. During the period that any vesting restrictions apply, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the recipient of awards that vest in the form of units of SLP will be eligible to participate in distributions of income from SLP. In addition, before the vesting conditions have been satisfied, the transferability of such units is generally prohibited and such units will not be eligible to be exchanged for cash or shares of our Class A common stock.

In August 2015, the Company granted 966,510 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.23 per share to existing Class B unit holders.  These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP.  Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,791 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to existing Class B unit holders.  These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP.  Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.  

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,000 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to certain members of the Board of Directors.  These RSUs vested and settled in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest.  One hundred percent of the RSUs granted vested and settled on the first anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 7,582 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to an employee.  These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest.  Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In October 2018, the Company granted 105,398 non-qualified stock options (“NQOs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder.  The fair value of the NQOs has been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions:  Strike price of $13.97, Risk Free rate of 2.94% (5-year treasury rate), expiration of 5 years and volatility of 32.7%.  Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience.  These NQOs will vest and become exercisable into of Class B units of SLP.  One third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded compensation expense related to such RSUs and NQOs of $842 and $800, respectively, as part of total compensation expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period then ended.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was $1,550 and $2,392, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.26 and 1.51 years, respectively.

25

A summary of the RSU grants by the Company as of March 31, 2019 and 2018 is presented below:

	Restricted Stock Units Granted
	Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		247,316	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at March 31, 2019		247,316	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at January 1, 2018		491,786	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at March 31, 2018		491,786	$	13.19 – 13.23

A summary of the NQO grants by the Company as of March 31, 2019 is presented below:

	Non-Qualified Options Granted
	Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		105,398	$	13.97
Total granted at March 31, 2019		105,398	$	13.97

17. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS

SAMG LLC has a defined contribution 401(k) savings plan (the “Plan”) for all eligible employees who meet the minimum age and service requirements as defined in the Plan. The Plan is designed to be a qualified plan under sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. For employees who qualify under the terms of the Plan, on an annual basis Silvercrest matches dollar for dollar an employee’s contributions up to the first 4% of compensation. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, Silvercrest made matching contributions of $22 and $19, respectively, for the benefit of employees.

18. SOFT DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS

The Company obtains research and other services through “soft dollar” arrangements. The Company receives credits from broker-dealers whereby technology-based research, market quotation and/or market survey services are effectively paid for in whole or in part by “soft dollar” brokerage arrangements. Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provides a “safe harbor” to an investment adviser against claims that it breached its fiduciary duty under state or federal law (including ERISA) solely because the adviser caused its clients’ accounts to pay more than the lowest available commission for executing a securities trade in return for brokerage and research services. To rely on the safe harbor offered by Section 28(e), (i) the Company must make a good-faith determination that the amount of commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services being received and (ii) the brokerage and research services must provide lawful and appropriate assistance to the Company in carrying out its investment decision-making responsibilities. If the use of soft dollars is limited or prohibited in the future by regulation, the Company may have to bear the costs of such research and other services. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company utilized “soft dollar” credits of $193 and $193, respectively.

19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 12, 2019, SAMG LLC and SLP entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Cortina Asset Management, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Cortina”), and certain interest holders of Cortina (the “Principals”) to acquire, directly or through a designated affiliate, substantially all of the assets of Cortina relating to Cortina’s business of providing investment management, investment advisory, and related services.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC agreed to pay to Cortina an aggregate maximum amount of $44,937, 80% of which shall be paid in cash at closing (which is anticipated to occur no later than 120 days from the date of the Purchase Agreement) by SAMG LLC, and 20% of which shall be paid by SLP in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals at closing of Class B Units in SLP, in each case subject to certain adjustments as described in the Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26,209 to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of SLP in potential earn-out payments over the next four years.

The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement is only a summary, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Purchase Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Silvercrest on April 15, 2019.

26

On May 1, 2019, the Company granted 34,338 RSUs and 60,742 NQOs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder of SLP.

*****

27

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We are a full-service wealth management firm focused on providing financial advisory and related family office services to ultra-high net worth individuals and institutional investors. In addition to a wide range of investment capabilities, we offer a full suite of complementary and customized family office services for families seeking a comprehensive oversight of their financial affairs. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, our assets under management increased by 9.3% from $19.0 billion to $20.8 billion.      

The business includes the management of funds of funds, and other investment funds, collectively referred to as the “Silvercrest Funds”.  As of March 31, 2019, Silvercrest L.P. has issued Restricted Stock Units exercisable for 243,523 Class B units which entitle the holders thereof to receive distributions from Silvercrest L.P. to the same extent as if the underlying Class B units were outstanding. Net profits and net losses of Silvercrest L.P. will be allocated, and distributions from Silvercrest L.P. will be made, to its current partners pro rata in accordance with their respective partnership units (and assuming the Class B units underlying all restricted stock units are outstanding).

The historical results of operations discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations include those of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. As the general partner of Silvercrest L.P., we control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial results with ours. The interests of the limited partners’ collective 37% partnership interest in Silvercrest L.P. as of March 31, 2019 are reflected in non-controlling interests in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Key Performance Indicators

When we review our performance, we focus on the indicators described below:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands except as indicated)	2019			2018
Revenue	$	22,572		$	24,331
Income before other income (expense), net	$	3,999		$	5,294
Net income	$	3,045		$	4,050
Net income margin		13.5	%		16.6	%
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$	1,709		$	2,231
Adjusted EBITDA (1)	$	5,753		$	6,924
Adjusted EBITDA margin (2)		25.5	%		28.5	%
Assets under management at period end (billions)	$	20.8		$	21.5
Average assets under management (billions) (3)	$	19.9		$	21.4

(1) EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure of earnings, represents net income before provision for income taxes, interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA without giving effect to items including, but not limited to, professional fees associated with acquisitions or financing transactions, gains on extinguishment of debt or other obligations related to acquisitions, losses on disposals or abandonment of assets and leaseholds, severance and other similar expenses, but including partner incentive allocations, prior to our initial public offering, as an expense. We use this non-GAAP financial measure to assess the strength of our business. These adjustments and the non-GAAP financial measures that are derived from them provide supplemental information to analyze our business from period to period. Investors should consider these non-GAAP financial measures in addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures in accordance with GAAP.   See “Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Information” for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures.

(2) Adjusted EBITDA margin, a non-GAAP measure of earnings, is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total revenue.

(3) We have computed average assets under management by averaging assets under management at the beginning of the applicable period and assets under management at the end of the applicable period.

Revenue

We generate revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations, and family office services fees. Our management and advisory fees are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Our performance fees and allocations relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which we have a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which we have no partnership interest. Our management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees and allocations is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved. In certain arrangements, we are only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

28

The discretionary investment management agreements for our separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for our private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by us upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a specified percentage of the investors in the private fund that are not affiliated with us, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for our private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) terminates, becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of our investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from us to our clients. The tables below set forth the amount of assets under management, the percentage of management and advisory fees revenues, the amount of revenue recognized, and the average assets under management for discretionary managed accounts and for private funds for each period presented.

Discretionary Managed Accounts

	As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in billions)	2019			2018
AUM concentrated in Discretionary Managed Accounts	$	14.6		$	15.4
Average AUM For Discretionary Managed Accounts	$	14.1		$	15.5
Discretionary Managed Accounts Revenue (in millions)	$	20.3		$	21.7
Percentage of management and advisory fees revenue		94.0	%		93.1	%

Private Funds

	As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in billions)	2019			2018
AUM concentrated in Private Funds	$	0.7		$	0.5
Average AUM For Private Funds	$	0.6		$	0.5
Private Funds Revenue (in millions)	$	1.3		$	1.6
Percentage of management and advisory fees revenue		6.0	%		6.9	%

Our management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of our assets under management. Our assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into our various investment strategies and the investment performance of our clients’ accounts. In order to increase our assets under management and expand our business, we must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of our target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. Our ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

• our ability to educate our target clients about our classic value investment strategies and provide them with exceptional client service;

• the relative investment performance of our investment strategies, as compared to competing products and market indices;

• competitive conditions in the investment management and broader financial services sectors;

• investor sentiment and confidence; and

• our decision to close strategies when we deem it to be in the best interests of our clients.

The majority of management and advisory fees that we earn on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of our management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. Our basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance and (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65%. Our fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of our client relationships pay a blended fee rate since they are invested in multiple strategies.

29

Management fees earned on investment funds that we advise are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For our private funds, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which we perform risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

Average annual management fee is calculated by dividing our actual annualized revenue earned over a period by our average assets under management during the same period (which is calculated by averaging quarter-end assets under management for the applicable period). Our average annual management fee was 0.45% and 0.46% for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  Changes in our total average management fee rates are typically the result of changes in the mix of our assets under management and the concentration in our equities strategies whose fee rates are higher than those of other investment strategies. Management and advisory fees are also adjusted for any cash flows into or out of a portfolio, where the cash flow represents greater than 10% of the previous quarter-end market value of the portfolio. These cash flow-related adjustments were insignificant for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018. Silvercrest L.P. has authority to take fees directly from external custodian accounts of its separately managed accounts.

Our management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

• changes in assets under management due to appreciation or depreciation of our investment portfolios, and the levels of the contribution and withdrawal of assets by new and existing clients;

• allocation of assets under management among our investment strategies, which have different fee schedules;

• allocation of assets under management between separately managed accounts and advised funds, for which we generally earn lower overall management and advisory fees; and

• the level of our performance with respect to accounts and funds on which we are paid performance fees and allocations.

Our family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to our clients. Our dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration and consolidated wealth reporting among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom we perform these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized.

Expenses

Our expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits expenses, as well as general and administrative expense including rent, professional services fees, data-related costs and sub-advisory fees. These expenses may fluctuate due to a number of factors, including the following:

• variations in the level of total compensation expense due to, among other things, bonuses, awards of equity to our employees and partners of Silvercrest L.P., changes in our employee count and mix, and competitive factors; and

• the level of management fees from funds that utilize sub-advisors will affect the amount of sub-advisory fees.

Compensation and Benefits Expense

Our largest expense is compensation and benefits, which includes the salaries, bonuses, equity-based compensation and related benefits and payroll costs attributable to our principals and employees. Our compensation methodology is intended to meet the following objectives: (i) support our overall business strategy; (ii) attract, retain and motivate top-tier professionals within the investment management industry; and (iii) align our employees’ interests with those of our equity owners. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, a general rise in compensation and benefits expense commensurate with growth in headcount and with the need to maintain competitive compensation levels.

30

The components of our compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2019		2018
Cash compensation and benefits (1)	$	12,521	$	13,510
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense		842		800
Total compensation expense	$	13,363	$	14,310

(1) For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, $5,391 and $6,763, respectively, of partner incentive payments were included in cash compensation and benefits expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.        

During 2016 and 2015, Silvercrest L.P. granted restricted stock units (“RSU”) to existing Class B unit holders.  During 2018, Silvercrest L.P. granted non-qualified options (“NQO”) to an existing Class B unit holder.  Information regarding restricted stock units and stock options can be found in Note 16. “Equity Based Compensation” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses include occupancy-related costs, professional and outside services fees, office expenses, depreciation and amortization, sub-advisory fees and the costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and portfolio accounting systems. Our costs associated with operating and maintaining our research, trading and portfolio accounting systems and professional services expenses generally increase or decrease in relative proportion to the number of employees retained by us and the overall size and scale of our business operations. Sub-advisory fees will fluctuate based on the level of management fees from funds that utilize sub-advisors.

Other Income

Other income is derived primarily from investment income arising from our investments in various private investment funds that were established as part of our investment strategies. We expect the investment components of other income, in the aggregate, to fluctuate based on market conditions and the success of our investment strategies. Performance fees and allocations earned from those investment funds in which we have a partnership interest have been earned over the past few years as a result of the achievement of various high-water marks depending on the investment fund. These performance fees and allocations are recorded based on the equity method of accounting. The majority of our performance fees and allocations over the past few years have been earned from our fixed income-related funds.

Non-Controlling Interests

We are the general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and control its business and affairs and, therefore, consolidate its financial results with ours. In light of the limited partners’ interest in Silvercrest L.P., we reflect their partnership interests as non-controlling interests in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Provision for Income Tax

We are subject to taxes applicable to C-corporations. Our effective tax rate, and the absolute dollar amount of our tax expense will be offset by the benefits of the tax receivable agreement entered into with our Class B stockholders.

Acquisitions

On December 13, 2018, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Neosho Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, Silvercrest L.P. (“SLP”), Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”) and Neosho Capital LLC (“Neosho” or the “Seller”), and Christopher K. Richey, Alphonse I. Chan, Robert K. Choi and Vincent G. Pandes, each such individual a principal of Neosho, to acquire certain assets of Neosho.  The transaction contemplated by the Neosho Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 15, 2019 and is referred to herein as the “Neosho Acquisition”.

On December 15, 2015, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Cappiccille Asset Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC and Cappiccille & Company, LLC (“Cappiccille”), and Michael Cappiccille, to acquire certain assets of Cappiccille.  The transaction contemplated by the Cappiccille Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 11, 2016 and is referred to herein as the “Cappiccille Acquisition”.  

31

Information regarding the Neosho and Cappiccille Acquisitions can be found in Note 3. “Acquisitions” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in “Item 1. Financial Statements” of this filing.

Operating Results

Revenue

Our revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are set forth below:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2019		2018		2019 vs. 2018 ($)			2019 vs. 2018 (%)
Management and advisory fees	$	21,589	$	23,303	$	(1,714	)		-7.4	%
Family office services		983		1,028		(45	)		-4.4	%
Total revenue	$	22,572	$	24,331	$	(1,759	)		-7.2	%

The growth in our assets under management during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is described below:

	Assets Under Management
				Non-
(in billions)	Discretionary			Discretionary			Total
As of January 1, 2018	$	16.0		$	5.3		$	21.3
Gross client inflows		2.0			0.2			2.2
Gross client outflows		(1.8	)		(0.2	)		(2.0	)
Market (depreciation) appreciation		(0.3	)		0.3			─
As of March 31, 2018	$	15.9		$	5.6		$	21.5	(1)
As of January 1, 2019	$	14.2		$	4.8		$	19.0
Gross client inflows		2.0			0.2			2.2
Gross client outflows		(2.2	)		─			(2.2	)
Market appreciation		1.3			0.5			1.8
As of March 31, 2019	$	15.3		$	5.5		$	20.8	(1)

(1) Less than 5% of assets under management generate performance fees or allocations.

32

The following chart summarizes the performance ^{1, 2} of each of our principal equity strategies relative to their appropriate benchmarks since inception:

PROPRIETARY EQUITY PERFORMANCE

as of March 31, 2019

	ANNUALIZED PERFORMANCE
	INCEPTION	1-YEAR	3-YEAR	5-YEAR	7-YEAR	INCEPTION
Large Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	7.0	14.0	10.8	13.1	8.9
Russell 1000 Value Index		5.7	10.5	7.7	11.1	7.2
Small Cap Value Composite	4/1/02	-1.1	10.4	7.1	10.9	10.4
Russell 2000 Value Index		0.2	10.9	5.6	9.6	7.8
Smid Cap Value Composite	10/1/05	1.7	13.2	9.4	12.1	9.9
Russell 2500 Value Index		1.8	9.9	6.0	10.2	7.3
Multi Cap Value Composite	7/1/02	3.5	12.5	10.0	12.6	9.6
Russell 3000 Value Index		5.3	10.5	7.6	11.0	7.9
Equity Income Composite	12/1/03	8.6	14.3	11.2	13.9	11.9
Russell 3000 Value Index		5.3	10.5	7.6	11.0	8.1
Focused Value Composite	9/1/04	3.5	13.1	10.5	12.8	10.8
Russell 3000 Value Index		5.3	10.5	7.6	11.0	7.8

1 Returns are based upon a time weighted rate of return of various fully discretionary equity portfolios with similar investment objectives, strategies and policies and other relevant criteria managed by SAMG LLC, a subsidiary of Silvercrest. Performance results are gross of fees and net of commission charges. An investor’s actual return will be reduced by the management and advisory fees and any other expenses it may incur in the management of the investment advisory account. SAMG LLC’s standard management and advisory fees are described in Part 2 of its Form ADV. Actual fees and expenses will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of a particular account. Returns greater than one year are shown as annualized compounded returns and include gains and accrued income and reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. This report contains no recommendations to buy or sell securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities or investment services or adopt any investment position. This report is not intended to constitute investment advice and is based upon conditions in place during the period noted. Market and economic views are subject to change without notice and may be untimely when presented here. Readers are advised not to infer or assume that any securities, sectors or markets described were or will be profitable. SAMG LLC is an independent investment advisory and financial services firm created to meet the investment and administrative needs of individuals with substantial assets and select institutional investors. SAMG LLC claims compliance with the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS^®).

2 The market indices used to compare to the performance of our strategies are as follows:

The Russell 1000 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 1000 largest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 1000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 1000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.

The Russell 2000 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 2000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 2000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.

The Russell 2500 Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures the 2500 smallest companies in the Russell 3000. The Russell 2500 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that includes those Russell 2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower expected growth values.

The Russell 3000 Value Index is a capitalization-weighted, unmanaged index that measures those Russell 3000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

Our total revenue decreased by $1.8 million, or 7.2%, to $22.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, from $24.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018. This decrease was driven by net client outflows in discretionary assets under management partially offset by market appreciation.

Total assets under management decreased by $0.7 billion, or 3.3%, to $20.8 billion at March 31, 2019 from $21.5 billion at March 31, 2018.  Compared to the three months ended March 31, 2018, there was an increase of $1.8 billion in market appreciation and an increase of $0.2 billion in net client outflows.  During the three months ended March 31, 2019, from December 31, 2018, there was an increase of $1.1 billion in discretionary assets under management while non-discretionary assets under management increased by $0.7 billion.  Sub-advised fund management revenue remained flat at $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in the prior year.  Proprietary fund management revenue decreased by $0.3 million for the three months

33

ended March 31, 2019 as compared to the same period in the prior year due to market conditions. With respect to our discretionary assets under management, equity assets experienced an increase of 10.4% during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and fixed income assets increased by 1.7% during the same period. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, most of the increase in equity assets came from our MLP, REIT and core international strategies with composite returns of 17.3%, 17.2% and 16.3%, respectively. As of March 31, 2019, the composition of our assets under management was 74% in discretionary assets, which includes both separately managed accounts and proprietary and sub-advised funds, and 26% in non-discretionary assets which represent assets on which we provide portfolio reporting but do not have investment discretion.

The following table represents a further breakdown of our assets under management as of the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018
Total AUM as of January 1,	$	19.0		$	21.3
Discretionary AUM:
Total Discretionary AUM as of January 1,		14.2			16.0
New client accounts/assets (1)		0.2			0.1
Closed accounts (2)		(0.4	)		─
Net cash inflow/(outflow) (3)		─			0.1
Non-discretionary to Discretionary AUM (4)		─			─
Market appreciation/(depreciation)		1.3			(0.3	)
Change to Discretionary AUM		1.1			(0.1	)
Total Discretionary AUM at March 31,		15.3			15.9
Change to Non-Discretionary AUM (5)		0.7			0.3
Total AUM as of March 31,	$	20.8		$	21.5

(1) Represents new account flows from both new and existing client relationships.

(2) Represents closed accounts of existing client relationships and those that terminated.

(3) Represents periodic cash flows related to existing accounts.

(4) Represents client assets that converted to Discretionary AUM from Non-Discretionary AUM.

(5) Represents the net change to Non-Discretionary AUM.

Expenses

Our expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are set forth below:

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2019		2018		2019 vs. 2018 ($)			2019 vs. 2018 (%)
Compensation and benefits (1)	$	13,363	$	14,310	$	(947	)		-6.6	%
General, administrative and other		5,210		4,727		483			10.2	%
Total expenses	$	18,573	$	19,037	$	(464	)		-2.4	%

(1) For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, $5,391 and $6,763, respectively, of partner incentive payments were included in cash compensation and benefits expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.    

Our expenses are driven primarily by our compensation costs. The table included in “—Expenses—Compensation and Benefits Expense” describes the components of our compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018. Other expenses, such as rent, professional service fees, data-related costs, and sub-advisory fees incurred are included in our general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

Total expenses decreased by $0.4 million, or 2.4%, to $18.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 from $19.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018. This decrease was attributable to a decrease in compensation and benefits expense of $0.9 million partially offset by an increase in general, administrative and other expenses of $0.5 million.

34

Compensation and benefits expense decreased by $0.9 million, or 6.6%, to $13.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 from $14.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the accrual for bonuses of $1.4 million, partially offset by an increase in salaries and benefits expense of $0.5 million primarily as a result of merit-based increases and newly hired staff.  

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million, or 10.2%, to $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 from $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in portfolio and systems expenses of $0.3 million due to an increase in soft dollar-related research costs, an increase in occupancy and related expenses of $0.1 million and an increase in moving and storage costs of $0.1 million.

Other Income (Expense), Net

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2019			2018			2019 vs. 2018 ($)			2019 vs. 2018 (%)
Other income (expense), net	$	7		$	10		$	(3	)		-30.0	%
Interest income		70			53			17			32.1	%
Interest expense		(8	)		(16	)		8			50.0	%
Total other income (expense), net	$	69		$	47		$	22			46.8	%

NM – Not Meaningful

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

Total other income (expense) net increased by $22 thousand to other income of $69 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2019 from other income of $47 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2018 due mainly to an increase in interest income.  This was partially offset by a decrease in interest expense due to lower balances on notes payable as a result of scheduled payments.

Provision for Income Taxes

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2018  

The provision for income taxes was $1.0 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The change was primarily the result of decreased profitability and favorable timing differences related to various deferred assets.  Our provision for income taxes as a percentage of income before provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was 25.1% and 24.2%, respectively.

Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Information

To provide investors with additional insight, promote transparency and allow for a more comprehensive understanding of the information used by management in its financial and operational decision-making, we supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented on a basis consistent with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, with Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA margin, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted Earnings Per Share which are non-GAAP financial measures of earnings.

• EBITDA represents net income before provision for income taxes, interest income, interest expense, depreciation and amortization.

• We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA without giving effect to the Delaware franchise tax, professional fees associated with acquisitions or financing transactions, gains on extinguishment of debt or other obligations related to acquisitions, impairment charges and losses on disposals or abandonment of assets and leaseholds, client reimbursements and fund redemption costs, severance and other similar expenses, but including partner incentive allocations, prior to our initial public offering, as an expense.  We feel that it is important to management and investors to supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring earnings of the Company, taking into account earnings attributable to both Class A and Class B shareholders.  

35

• Adjusted EBITDA Margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted EBITDA by total revenue.  We feel that it is important to management and investors to supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted EBITDA Margin, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring profitability of the Company, taking into account profitability attributable to both Class A and Class B shareholders.

• Adjusted Net Income represents recurring net income without giving effect to professional fees associated with acquisitions or financing transactions, losses on forgiveness of notes receivable from our principals, gains on extinguishment of debt or other obligations related to acquisitions, impairment charges and losses on disposals or abandonment of assets and leaseholds, client reimbursements and fund redemption costs, severance and other similar expenses, but including partner incentive allocations, prior to our initial public offering, as an expense. Furthermore, Adjusted Net Income includes income tax expense assuming a blended corporate rate of 26%.  We feel that it is important to management and investors to supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted Net Income, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring income of the Company, taking into account income attributable to both Class A and Class B shareholders.

• Adjusted Earnings Per Share represents Adjusted Net Income divided by the actual Class A and Class B shares outstanding as of the end of the reporting period for basic Adjusted Earnings Per Share, and to the extent dilutive, we add unvested restricted stock units and non-qualified stock options to the total shares outstanding to compute diluted Adjusted Earnings Per Share. As a result of our structure, which includes a non-controlling interest, we feel that it is important to management and investors to supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented on a GAAP basis with Adjusted Earnings Per Share, a non-GAAP financial measure of earnings, as this measure provides a perspective of recurring earnings per share of the Company as a whole as opposed to being limited to our Class A common stock.

These adjustments, and the non-GAAP financial measures that are derived from them, provide supplemental information to analyze our operations between periods and over time. Investors should consider our non-GAAP financial measure in addition to, and not as a substitute for, financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

36

The following tables contain reconciliations of net income to Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share (amounts in thousands except per share amounts).

	Three Months Ended  March 31,
	2019			2018
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:
Net income	$	3,045		$	4,050
GAAP Provision for income taxes		1,023			1,291
Delaware Franchise Tax		50			62
Interest expense		8			16
Interest income		(70	)		(53	)
Depreciation and amortization		511			613
Equity-based compensation		842			800
Other adjustments (A)		344			145
Adjusted EBITDA	$	5,753		$	6,924
Adjusted EBITDA Margin		25.5	%		28.5	%
Adjusted Net Income and Adjusted Earnings Per Share
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measure:
Net income	$	3,045		$	4,050
GAAP Provision for income taxes		1,023			1,291
Delaware Franchise Tax		50			62
Interest component of financing leases pursuant to ASC 842		(27	)		—
Other adjustments (A)		344			145
Adjusted earnings before provision for income taxes		4,435			5,548
Adjusted provision for income taxes:
Adjusted provision for income taxes (26% assumed tax rate)		(1,153	)		(1,442	)
Adjusted net income	$	3,282		$	4,106
GAAP net income per share (B):
Basic and diluted	$	0.20		$	0.27
Adjusted earnings per share/unit (B):
Basic	$	0.24		$	0.31
Diluted	$	0.24		$	0.30
Shares/units outstanding:
Basic Class A shares outstanding		8,535			8,259
Basic Class B shares/units outstanding		4,919			4,942
Total basic shares/units outstanding		13,454			13,201
Diluted Class A shares outstanding (C)		8,539			8,265
Diluted Class B shares/units outstanding (D)		5,267			5,428
Total diluted shares/units outstanding		13,806			13,693

(A) Other adjustments consist of the following:

	Three Months Ended  March 31,
	2019		2018
Non-acquisition expansion costs (a)	$	97	$	76
Acquisition costs (b)		138		—
Severance		13		—
Other (c)		96		69
Total other adjustments	$	344	$	145

(a) For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, represents accrued earnout of $97 and $76, respectively, related to our Richmond, VA office expansion.  

(b) For the three months ended March 31, 2019, represents legal fees of $118 related to the Neosho Acquisition and legal fees of $20 related to the acquisition of Cortina Asset Management, LLC.      

(c) For the three months ended March 31, 2019, represents moving expenses of $48 related to office relocations and an ASC 842 rent adjustment of $48 related to the amortization of property lease incentives.  For the three months ended March 31, 2018, represents professional fees of $15 for services related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and $54 related to a sign on bonus paid to a certain employee  

(B) GAAP net income per share is strictly attributable to Class A shareholders.  Adjusted earnings per share takes into account earnings attributable to both Class A and Class B shareholders.

37

(C) Includes 3,792 and 5,687 unvested restricted stock units at March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

(D) Includes 243,524 and 486,098 unvested restricted stock units and 105,398 and zero unvested non-qualified stock options at March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, the working capital needs of our business have primarily been met through cash generated by our operations. We expect that our cash and liquidity requirements in the next twelve months will be met primarily through cash generated by our operations.

On June 24, 2013, the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. entered into a $15.0 million credit facility with City National Bank. The subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. are the borrowers under such facility and Silvercrest L.P. guarantees the obligations of its subsidiaries under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by certain assets of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. The credit facility consists of a $7.5 million delayed draw term loan that matures on June 24, 2025 and a $7.5 million revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on December 21, 2018.  On June 22, 2018, the revolving credit facility was extended to June 21, 2019.   The loan bears interest at either (a) the higher of the prime rate plus a margin of 0.05 percentage points and 2.5% or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 3 percentage points, at the borrowers’ option.  As of March 31, 2019, there were no borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility. As of March 31, 2019, no amount has been drawn on the term loan credit facility.  On June 22, 2018, the term loan was amended to extend the draw date to June 25, 2023 and to extend the maturity date to June 24, 2025. The borrowers are able to draw up to the full amount of the term loan through June 25, 2023. Borrowings under the term loan on or prior to June 24, 2020 are payable in 20 equal quarterly installments.  Borrowings under the term loan after June 24, 2020 will be payable in equal quarterly installments through the maturity date. The credit facility contains restrictions on, among other things, (i) incurrence of additional debt, (ii) creating liens on certain assets, (iii) making certain investments, (iv) consolidating, merging or otherwise disposing of substantially all of our assets, (v) the sale of certain assets, and (vi) entering into transactions with affiliates. In addition, the credit facility contains certain financial covenants including a test on discretionary assets under management, maximum debt to EBITDA and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The credit facility contains customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change in control which includes a person or group of persons acting together acquiring more than 30% of the total voting securities of Silvercrest. Any undrawn amounts under this facility would be available to fund future acquisitions or for working capital purposes, if needed. We were in compliance with the covenants under the credit facility as of March 31, 2019.

Our ongoing sources of cash will primarily consist of management fees and family office services fees, which are principally collected quarterly. We will primarily use cash flow from operations to pay compensation and related expenses, general and administrative expenses, income taxes, debt service, capital expenditures, distributions to Class B unit holders and dividends on shares of our Class A common stock.

Seasonality typically affects cash flow since the first quarter of each year includes, as a source of cash, payment of the prior year’s annual performance fees and allocations, if any, from our various funds and external investment strategies and, as a use of cash, the prior fiscal year’s incentive compensation. We believe that we have sufficient cash from our operations to fund our operations and commitments for the next twelve months.

The following table sets forth certain key financial data relating to our liquidity and capital resources as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

	As of
(in thousands)	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,494	$	69,283
Accounts receivable	$	6,352	$	7,999
Due from Silvercrest Funds	$	1,417	$	1,256

We anticipate that distributions to the limited partners of Silvercrest L.P. will continue to be a material use of our cash resources and will vary in amount and timing based on our operating results and dividend policy. We pay and intend to continue paying quarterly cash dividends to holders of our Class A common stock. We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our ownership of interests in Silvercrest L.P. As a result, we will depend upon distributions from Silvercrest L.P. to pay any dividends to our Class A stockholders. We expect to cause Silvercrest L.P. to make distributions to us in an amount sufficient to cover dividends, if any, declared by us. Our dividend policy has certain risks and limitations, particularly with respect to liquidity. Although we expect to pay dividends according to our dividend policy, we may not pay dividends according to our policy, or at all, if, among other things, we do not have the cash necessary to pay our intended dividends or our subsidiaries are prevented from making a distribution to us under the terms of our current credit facility or any future financing. To the extent we do not have cash on hand sufficient to pay dividends, we may decide not to pay dividends. By paying cash dividends rather than investing that cash in our future growth, we risk

38

slowing the pace of our growth, or not having a sufficient amount of cash to fund our operations or unanticipated capital expenditures, should the need arise.

Our purchase of Class B units in Silvercrest L.P. that occurred concurrently with the consummation of our initial public offering, and the future exchanges of Class B units of Silvercrest L.P., are expected to result in increases in our share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Silvercrest L.P. at the time of our acquisition and these future exchanges, which will increase the tax depreciation and amortization deductions that otherwise would not have been available to us. These increases in tax basis and tax depreciation and amortization deductions are expected to reduce the amount of tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future. We entered into a tax receivable agreement with the current principals of Silvercrest L.P. and any future employee-holders of Class B units pursuant to which we agreed to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that we actually realize as a result of these increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments thereunder. The timing of these payments is currently unknown. The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement will be a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P., and thus this liability has been recorded as an “other liability” on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. For purposes of the tax receivable agreement, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing our actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been required to pay had there been no increase in our share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Silvercrest L.P.

The actual increase in tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the tax receivable agreement, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the price of shares of our Class A common stock at the time of the exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of our income and the tax rates then applicable. Nevertheless, we expect that as a result of the size of the increases in the tax basis of our tangible and intangible assets, the payments that we may make under the tax receivable agreement likely will be substantial. Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize the full tax benefit of the increased depreciation and amortization of our assets, we expect that future payments to the selling principals of Silvercrest L.P. in respect of our purchase of Class B units from them will aggregate approximately $9.4 million. Future payments to current principals of Silvercrest L.P. and future holders of Class B units in respect of subsequent exchanges would be in addition to these amounts and are expected to be substantial. We intend to fund required payments pursuant to the tax receivable agreement from the distributions received from Silvercrest L.P.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018. Operating activities consist of net income subject to adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities, depreciation, and equity-based compensation expense. Investing activities consist primarily of acquiring and selling property and equipment, and cash paid as part of business acquisitions. Financing activities consist primarily of contributions from partners, distributions to partners, dividends paid on Class A common stock, the issuance and payments on partner notes, other financings, and earnout payments related to business acquisitions.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)	2019			2018
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(20,945	)	$	(15,170	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(617	)		(143	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,227	)		(3,115	)
Net change in cash	$	(23,789	)	$	(18,428	)

Operating Activities

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, operating activities used $20.9 million and $15.2 million, respectively. This difference is primarily the result of a decrease in net income of $1.0 million, increased payouts of accrued compensation of $4.7 million, a decrease in deferred rent expense of $1.3 million as a result of adopting ASC 842, a decrease in the adjustment to the tax receivable agreement of $0.5 million, a decrease in accounts receivable of $0.2 million due to the timing of payments received from clients and a decrease in depreciation and amortization of $0.1 million.  This was partially offset by an increase in deferred tax expense of $0.3 million, an increase in prepaid and other expenses of $1.2 million and an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.4 million due to timing of payments to vendors.

Investing Activities

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2018

39

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, investing activities used $0.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The primary use of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2019 was for cash paid at closing of the Neosho Acquisition and for the acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements.  The primary use of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2018 was the acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements.  

Financing Activities

Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2018  

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, financing activities used $2.2 million and $3.1 million, respectively.  Distributions to partners during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were $2.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively.  This increase is due to an increase in both distributions to partners and composite tax payments during the three months ended March 31, 2019 as compared with the prior period. During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company paid dividends of $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, to Class A shareholders.  During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, we made earnout payments of $0.4 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, we received payments from partners on notes receivable of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively.      

We anticipate that distributions to principals of Silvercrest L.P. will continue to be a material use of our cash resources, and will vary in amount and timing based on our operating results and dividend policy.

As described herein, we had outstanding fixed rate notes payable to Jamison, Eaton & Wood, Inc. and its principals related to the Jamison Acquisition, which were fully repaid as of September 30, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, nothing was outstanding on our revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

On June 30, 2015, we issued promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of approximately $2.2 million in connection with the Jamison Acquisition.  The principal amount outstanding under the notes bears interest at 5%.  The principal amounts of the notes are payable in three equal installments of approximately $722 thousand on each of June 30, 2016, 2017 and 2018.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $0 remained outstanding on the notes.  As of March 31, 2019 and 2018 accrued but unpaid interest on the notes payable related to the Jamison Acquisition was $0 and $27 thousand respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2019from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2019.

Revenue Recognition

Investment advisory fees are typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter, based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

We account for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606-10-32, Accounting for Management Fees Based on a Formula, by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, we are only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. We record performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue.

40

Because the majority of our revenues are earned based on assets under management that have been determined using fair value methods and since market appreciation/depreciation has a significant impact on our revenue, we have presented our assets under management using the GAAP framework for measuring fair value. That framework provides a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs based on company assumptions (Level 3). A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the instrument’s fair value measurement. The three levels within the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:

• Level 1—includes quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical instruments at the measurement date. The types of financial instruments included in Level 1 include unrestricted securities, including equities listed in active markets.

• Level 2—includes inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the instruments, including quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the instruments. The type of financial instruments in this category include less liquid and restricted securities listed in active markets, securities traded in other than active markets, government and agency securities, and managed funds whose net asset value is based on observable inputs.

• Level 3—includes one or more significant unobservable inputs. Financial instruments that are included in this category include assets under management primarily comprised of investments in privately-held entities, limited partnerships, and other instruments where the fair value is based on unobservable inputs.

The table below summarizes the approximate amount of assets under management for the periods indicated for which fair value is measured based on Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	(in billions)
March 31, 2019 AUM	$	15.2	$	3.4	$	2.2	$	20.8
December 31, 2018 AUM	$	13.9	$	2.9	$	2.2	$	19.0

As substantially all our assets under management are valued by independent pricing services based upon observable market prices or inputs, we believe market risk is the most significant risk underlying valuation of our assets under management, as discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and Item 3. “– Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures Regarding Market Risk.”

The average value of our assets under management for the three months ended March 31, 2019 was approximately $19.9 billion. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in our average assets under management and the change being proportionately distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately $2.0 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2019, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $9.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, at a weighted average fee rate for the three months ended March 31, 2019 of 0.45%.  

The average value of our assets under management for the year ended December 31, 2018 was approximately $20.2 billion. Assuming a 10% increase or decrease in our average assets under management and the change being proportionately distributed over all our products, the value would increase or decrease by approximately $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2018, which would cause an annualized increase or decrease in revenues of approximately $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, at a weighted average fee rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 of 0.49%.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Information regarding recent accounting developments and their impact on the Company can be found in Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in this filing.

Subsequent Events

On April 12, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Cortina Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Cortina Asset Management, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Cortina”), and certain interest holders of Cortina (the “Principals”) to acquire, directly or through a designated affiliate, substantially all of the assets of Cortina relating to Cortina’s business of providing investment management, investment advisory, and related services.

41

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, we agreed to pay to Cortina an aggregate maximum amount of $44,937, 80% of which shall be paid in cash at closing (which is anticipated to occur no later than 120 days from the date of the Purchase Agreement) by us, and 20% of which shall be paid by us in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals at closing of Class B Units in Silvercrest L.P., in each case subject to certain adjustments as described in the Cortina Asset Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Cortina Asset Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26,209 to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of Silvercrest L.P. in potential earn-out payments over the next four years.

The foregoing description of the Cortina Asset Purchase Agreement is only a summary, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Purchase Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by us on April 15, 2019.

On May 1, 2019, we granted 34,338 RSUs and 60,742 NQOs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder of Silvercrest L.P.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Market Risk

Our exposure to market risk is directly related to our role as investment adviser for the separate accounts we manage and the funds for which we act as sub-investment adviser. Most of our revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was derived from advisory fees, which are typically based on the market value of assets under management. Accordingly, a decline in the prices of securities would cause our revenue and income to decline due to a decrease in the value of the assets we manage. In addition, such a decline could cause our clients to withdraw their funds in favor of investments offering higher returns or lower risk, which would cause our revenue and income to decline further. Due to the nature of our business, we believe that we do not face any material risk from inflation. Please see our discussion of market risks in “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Revenue Recognition” which is part of Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) at March 31, 2019. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at March 31, 2019.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2019 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

42

PART II - Other Information

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1**	Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2**	Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1***	Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2***	Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

** Filed herewith

*** Furnished herewith

43

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of New York, state of New York, on May 2, 2019.

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.

		By:	/s/ Richard R. Hough III
Date:	May 2, 2019		Richard R. Hough III
			Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
			(Principal Executive Officer)
			/s/ Scott A. Gerard
Date:	May 2, 2019		Scott A. Gerard
			Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

44

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard R. Hough III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Richard R. Hough III

Richard R. Hough III

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 2, 2019

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Scott A. Gerard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Scott A. Gerard

Scott A. Gerard

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: May 2, 2019

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard R. Hough III, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

• The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

• The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Richard R. Hough III

Richard R. Hough III

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: May 2, 2019

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. and will be retained by Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott A. Gerard, the Chief Financial Officer of Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

• The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

• The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott A. Gerard

Scott A. Gerard

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date: May 2, 2019

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. and will be retained by Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Document and Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Apr. 30, 2019
Document Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2019
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2019
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Trading Symbol	SAMG
Entity Registrant Name	Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001549966
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Entity Small Business	true
Entity Emerging Growth Company	false
Class A Common Stock
Document Information [Line Items]
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		8,535,170
Class B Common Stock
Document Information [Line Items]
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		4,918,545

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 45,494	$ 69,283
Investments	1,493	1,493
Receivables, net	6,352	8,022
Due from Silvercrest Funds	1,417	1,233
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	3,262	3,436
Goodwill	27,352	25,168
Operating lease assets	36,150
Finance lease assets	180
Intangible assets, net	9,545	9,893
Deferred tax asset—tax receivable agreement	11,846	12,206
Prepaid expenses and other assets	3,363	2,629
Total assets	146,454	133,363
Liabilities and Equity
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	4,903	2,947
Accrued compensation	6,368	31,470
Deferred rent		7,225
Operating lease liabilities	42,785
Finance lease liabilities	183
Deferred tax and other liabilities	9,175	9,322
Total liabilities	63,414	50,964
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Equity
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
Additional Paid-In Capital	43,696	43,584
Retained earnings	12,761	12,330
Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.’s equity	56,590	56,047
Non-controlling interests	26,450	26,352
Total equity	83,040	82,399
Total liabilities and equity	146,454	133,363
Class A Common Stock
Equity
Common stock, value	85	85
Total equity	85	85
Class B Common Stock
Equity
Common stock, value	48	48
Total equity	$ 48	$ 48

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Class A Common Stock
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	8,535,170	8,518,096
Common stock, shares outstanding	8,535,170	8,518,096
Class B Common Stock
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	4,918,545	4,934,103
Common stock, shares outstanding	4,918,545	4,934,103

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018
Revenue
Total revenue	$ 22,572	$ 24,331
Expenses
Compensation and benefits	13,363	14,310
General and administrative	5,210	4,727
Total expenses	18,573	19,037
Income before other (expense) income, net	3,999	5,294
Other (expense) income, net
Other (expense) income, net	7	10
Interest income	70	53
Interest expense	(8)	(16)
Total other (expense) income, net	69	47
Income before provision for income taxes	4,068	5,341
Provision for income taxes	1,023	1,291
Net income	3,045	4,050
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests	(1,336)	(1,819)
Net income attributable to Silvercrest	$ 1,709	$ 2,231
Net income per share:
Basic	$ 0.20	$ 0.27
Diluted	$ 0.20	$ 0.27
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	8,519,058	8,187,279
Diluted	8,522,850	8,192,966
Management and Advisory Fees
Revenue
Total revenue	$ 21,589	$ 23,303
Family Office Services
Revenue
Total revenue	$ 983	$ 1,028

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Total	Class A Common Stock	Class B Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Retained Earnings	Total Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc.'s Equity	Non-controlling Interest
Balance at Dec. 31, 2017	$ 72,119	$ 81	$ 49	$ 41,606	$ 7,359	$ 49,095	$ 23,024
Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2017		8,142,000	5,059,000
Distributions to partners	(2,072)						(2,072)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners	552						552
Equity-based compensation	800			6		6	794
Net Income	4,050				2,231	2,231	1,819
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners	(8)						(8)
Share conversion, Value		$ 1	$ (1)	605		605	(605)
Share conversion, Shares		117,000	(117,000)
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement	(14)			(14)		(14)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock	(1,144)				(1,144)	(1,144)
Balance at Mar. 31, 2018	74,283	$ 82	$ 48	42,203	8,446	50,779	23,504
Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2018		8,259,000	4,942,000
Balance at Dec. 31, 2017	72,119	$ 81	$ 49	41,606	7,359	49,095	23,024
Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2017		8,142,000	5,059,000
Balance at Dec. 31, 2018	82,399	$ 85	$ 48	43,584	12,330	56,047	26,352
Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2018		8,518,096	4,934,103
Distributions to partners	(2,285)						(2,285)
Repayment of notes receivable from partners	291						291
Equity-based compensation	842			6		6	836
Issuance of Class B shares, Value	20						20
Issuance of Class B shares, Shares			2,000
Net Income	3,045				1,709	1,709	1,336
Accrued interest on notes receivable from partners	(3)						(3)
Share conversion, Value				97		97	(97)
Share conversion, Shares		17,000	(17,000)
Deferred tax, net of amounts payable under tax receivable agreement	9			9		9
Dividends paid on Class A common stock	(1,278)				(1,278)	(1,278)
Balance at Mar. 31, 2019	$ 83,040	$ 85	$ 48	$ 43,696	$ 12,761	$ 56,590	$ 26,450
Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2019		8,535,170	4,918,545

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018
Class A Common Stock
Common stock dividends, per share	$ 0.15	$ 0.14

XML

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$ 3,045	$ 4,050
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Equity-based compensation	842	800
Depreciation and amortization	511	613
Deferred rent		1,292
Deferred income taxes	409	130
Tax receivable agreement adjustment		474
Non-cash interest on notes receivable from partners	(3)	(8)
Cash flows due to changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables and due from Silvercrest Funds	(761)	(573)
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(448)	(1,679)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	562	134
Accrued compensation	(25,102)	(20,412)
Interest payable on notes payable		9
Net cash used in operating activities	(20,945)	(15,170)
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Acquisition of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements	(218)	(143)
Net cash used in investing activities	(617)	(143)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Principal payments on financing leases	(30)	(4)
Operating lease liabilities	1,500
Distributions to partners	(2,285)	(2,072)
Dividends paid on Class A common stock	(1,278)	(1,144)
Payments from partners on notes receivable	291	552
Net cash used in financing activities	(2,227)	(3,115)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(23,789)	(18,428)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	69,283	53,822
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	45,494	35,394
Net cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	841	2,398
Interest	1	3
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-cash Financing and Investing Activities
Recognition of deferred tax assets as a result of share conversions	69	552
Assets acquired under finance lease	26	11
Operating lease assets (ASC 842 adoption)	36,150
Operating lease liabilities (ASC 842 adoption)	42,785
Finance lease assets (ASC 842 adoption)	180
Finance lease liabilities (ASC 842 adoption)	183
Neosho Capital, LLC
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Acquisition	(399)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Earn-outs paid related to acquisitions completed on or after January 1, 2009	(425)	$ (447)
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-cash Financing and Investing Activities
Earnout accrual for acquisition	$ 1,686

XML

Organization and Business

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]

Organization and Business

1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. (“Silvercrest”), together with its consolidated subsidiary, Silvercrest L.P., a limited partnership, (collectively the “Company”), was formed as a Delaware corporation on July 11, 2011. Silvercrest is a holding company that was formed in order to carry on the business of Silvercrest L.P., the managing member of our operating subsidiary, and its subsidiaries.  Effective on June 26, 2013, Silvercrest became the sole general partner of Silvercrest L.P. and its only material asset is the general partner interest in Silvercrest L.P., represented by 8,535,170 Class A units or approximately 63.3% of the outstanding interests of Silvercrest L.P.  Silvercrest controls all of the businesses and affairs of Silvercrest L.P. and, through Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries, continues to conduct the business previously conducted by these entities prior to the reorganization.  

Silvercrest L.P., together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively “SLP”), provides investment management and family office services to individuals and families and their trusts, and to endowments, foundations and other institutional investors primarily located in the United States of America. The business includes the management of funds of funds and other investment funds, collectively referred to as the “Silvercrest Funds”.

Silvercrest L.P. was formed on December 10, 2008 and commenced operations on January 1, 2009.

On March 11, 2004, Silvercrest Asset Management Group LLC (“SAMG LLC”) acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of James C. Edwards Asset Management, Inc. (“JCE”) and subsequently changed JCE’s name to Silvercrest Financial Services, Inc. (“SFS”). On December 31, 2004, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of the LongChamp Group, Inc. (now SAM Alternative Solutions, Inc.) (“LGI”). Effective March 31, 2005, SLP entered into an Asset Contribution Agreement with and acquired all of the assets, properties, rights and certain liabilities of Heritage Financial Management, LLC (“HFM”). Effective October 3, 2008, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of Marathon Capital Group, LLC (“MCG”) through a limited liability company interest purchase agreement dated September 22, 2008. On November 1, 2011, SLP acquired certain assets of Milbank Winthrop & Co. (“Milbank”). On April 1, 2012, SLP acquired 100% of the outstanding limited liability company interests of MW Commodity Advisors, LLC (“Commodity Advisors”). On March 28, 2013, SLP acquired certain assets of Ten-Sixty Asset Management, LLC (“Ten-Sixty”). On June 30, 2015, SLP acquired certain assets of Jamison, Eaton & Wood, Inc. (“Jamison”).  On January 11, 2016, SLP acquired certain assets of Cappiccille & Company, LLC (“Cappiccille”).  On January 15, 2019, SLP acquired certain assets of Neosho Capital LLC (“Neosho”).  See Notes 3, 7 and 8 for additional information related to the acquisition, goodwill and intangible assets arising from these acquisitions.

Tax Receivable Agreement

In connection with the Company’s initial public offering (the “IPO”) and reorganization of SLP that were completed on June 26, 2013, Silvercrest entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “TRA”) with the partners of SLP that requires it to pay them 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that it actually realizes (or are deemed to realize in the case of an early termination payment by it, or a change in control) as a result of the increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to entering into the TRA, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the TRA.  The payments to be made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement are a liability of Silvercrest and not Silvercrest L.P.  As of March 31, 2019, this liability is estimated to be $9,063 and is included in deferred tax and other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Silvercrest expects to benefit from the remaining 15% of cash savings realized, if any.

The TRA was effective upon the consummation of the IPO and will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired, unless Silvercrest exercises its right to terminate the TRA for an amount based on an agreed upon value of the payments remaining to be made under the agreement. The TRA will automatically terminate with respect to Silvercrest’s obligations to a partner if a partner (i) is terminated for cause, (ii) breaches his or her non-solicitation covenants with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries or (iii) voluntarily resigns or retires and competes with Silvercrest or any of its subsidiaries in the 12-month period following resignation of employment or retirement, and no further payments will be made to such partner under the TRA.

For purposes of the TRA, cash savings in income tax will be computed by comparing Silvercrest’s actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that it would have been required to pay had there been no increase in its share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of SLP.

Estimating the amount of payments that Silvercrest may be required to make under the TRA is imprecise by nature, because the actual increase in its share of the tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including:

• the timing of exchanges of Silvercrest’s Class B units for shares of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock—for instance, the increase in any tax deductions will vary depending on the fair market value, which may fluctuate over time, of the depreciable and amortizable assets of SLP at the time of the exchanges;

• the price of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock at the time of exchanges of Silvercrest’s Class B units—the increase in Silvercrest’s share of the basis in the assets of SLP, as well as the increase in any tax deductions, will be related to the price of Silvercrest’s Class A common stock at the time of these exchanges;

• the extent to which these exchanges are taxable—if an exchange is not taxable for any reason (for instance, if a principal who holds Silvercrest’s Class B units exchanges units in order to make a charitable contribution), increased deductions will not be available;

• the tax rates in effect at the time Silvercrest utilizes the increased amortization and depreciation deductions; and

• the amount and timing of Silvercrest’s income—Silvercrest will be required to pay 85% of the tax savings, as and when realized, if any. If Silvercrest does not have taxable income, it generally will not be required to make payments under the TRA for that taxable year because no tax savings will have been actually realized.

In addition, the TRA provides that, upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, Silvercrest’s (or its successors’) obligations with respect to exchanged or acquired Silvercrest Class B units (whether exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would be based on certain assumptions, including that Silvercrest would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits related to entering into the TRA.

Decisions made by the continuing partners of SLP in the course of running Silvercrest’s business, such as with respect to mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes in control, may influence the timing and amount of payments that are received by an exchanging or selling principal under the TRA. For example, the earlier disposition of assets following an exchange or acquisition transaction will generally accelerate payments under the TRA and increase the present value of such payments, and the disposition of assets before an exchange or acquisition transaction will increase an existing owner’s tax liability without giving rise to any rights of a principal to receive payments under the TRA.

Were the IRS to successfully challenge the tax basis increases described above, Silvercrest would not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the TRA. As a result, in certain circumstances, Silvercrest could make payments under the TRA in excess of its actual cash savings in income tax.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Silvercrest and its wholly owned subsidiaries SLP, SAMG LLC, SFS, MCG, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Investors III LLC as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.  All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2018 was derived from the audited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018 or any future period.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial position and results, have been made. The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes should be read together with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The Company evaluates for consolidation those entities it controls through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those Silvercrest Funds over which the general partner or equivalent is presumed to have control, e.g. by virtue of the limited partners not being able to remove the general partner. The initial step in the Company’s determination of whether a fund for which SLP is the general partner is required to be consolidated is assessing whether the fund is a variable interest entity or a voting interest entity.

SLP then considers whether the fund is a voting interest entity (“VoIE”) in which the unaffiliated limited partners have substantive “kick-out” rights that provide the ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause. SLP considers the “kick-out” rights to be substantive if the general partner for the fund can be removed by the vote of a simple majority of the unaffiliated limited partners and there are no significant barriers to the unaffiliated limited partners’ ability to exercise these rights in that among other things, (1) there are no conditions or timing limits on when the rights can be exercised, (2) there are no financial or operational barriers associated with replacing the general partner, (3) there are a number of qualified replacement investment advisors that would accept appointment at the same fee level, (4) each fund’s documents provide for the ability to call and conduct a vote, and (5) the information necessary to exercise the kick-out rights and related vote are available from the fund and its administrator.

If the fund is a variable interest entity, SLP then determines whether it has a variable interest in the fund, and if so, whether SLP is the primary beneficiary. 

During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, each fund is deemed to be a VoIE and neither SLP nor Silvercrest consolidated any of the Silvercrest Funds.

Non-controlling Interest

As of March 31, 2019, Silvercrest holds approximately 63.3% of the economic interests in SLP. Silvercrest is the sole general partner of SLP and, therefore, controls the management of SLP. As a result, Silvercrest consolidates the financial position and the results of operations of SLP and its subsidiaries, and records a non-controlling interest, as a separate component of equity on its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for the remaining economic interests in SLP. The non-controlling interest in the income or loss of SLP is included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a reduction or addition to net income derived from SLP.

Segment Reporting

The Company views its operations as comprising one operating segment. Each of the Company’s acquired businesses has similar economic characteristics and has been or is in the process of being fully integrated. Furthermore, our chief operating decision maker, who is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, monitors and reviews financial information at a consolidated level for assessing operating results and the allocation of resources.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and other income reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, determination of equity-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, determination of the useful lives of long-lived assets and other matters that affect the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Equity Method Investments

Entities and investments, the activities over which the Company exercises significant influence, but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, whereby the Company records its share of the underlying income or losses of these entities. Intercompany profit arising from transactions with affiliates is eliminated to the extent of its beneficial interest. Equity in losses of equity method investments is not recognized after the carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans, has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other funding obligations exist.

The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable. The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment when the loss in value is deemed other than temporary. The Company’s equity method investments approximate their fair value at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The fair value of the equity method investments is estimated based on the Company’s share of the fair value of the net assets of the equity method investee. No impairment charges related to equity method investments were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2019 or 2018.

Receivables and Due from Silvercrest Funds

Receivables consist primarily of amounts for management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations and family office service fees due from clients, and are stated as net realizable value. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful receivables based on estimates of expected losses and specific identification of uncollectible accounts. The Company charges actual losses to the allowance when incurred.

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements consist primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment, computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements and are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which for leasehold improvements is the lesser of the lease term or the life of the asset, generally 10 years, and 3 to 7 years for other fixed assets.

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires that the purchase price, including the fair value of contingent consideration, of the acquisition be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is recorded as part of the purchase price when such contingent consideration is not based on continuing employment of the selling shareholders. Contingent consideration that is related to continuing employment is recorded as compensation expense. Payments made for contingent consideration recorded as part of an acquisition’s purchase price are reflected as financing activities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company remeasures the fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period using a probability-adjusted discounted cash flow method based on significant inputs not observable in the market and any change in the fair value from either the passage of time or events occurring after the acquisition date, is recorded in earnings. Contingent consideration payments that exceed the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration are reflected as an operating activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired, including intangibles, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. The Company generally uses valuation specialists to perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These valuations require management to make estimates and assumptions that are critical in determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities. During the measurement period, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Any adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period are recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized and is generally evaluated for impairment using a two-step process that is performed at least annually, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.

The Company accounts for Goodwill under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” which provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment of whether a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less than its carrying value, including goodwill. In performing its qualitative assessment, an entity considers the extent to which adverse events or circumstances identified, such as changes in economic conditions, industry and market conditions or entity specific events, could affect the comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. If an entity concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying amount, the entity is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and, accordingly, measure the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit. The Company utilized this option when performing its annual impairment assessment in 2018 and 2017 and concluded that its single reporting unit’s fair value was more likely than not greater than its carrying value, including goodwill.

The Company has one reporting unit at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. No goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The method of amortization is based on the pattern over which the economic benefits, generally expected undiscounted cash flows, of the intangible asset are consumed. Intangible assets for which no pattern can be reliably determined are amortized using the straight-line method. Intangible assets consist primarily of the contractual right to future management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations from customer contracts or relationships.

Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In connection with such review, the Company also reevaluates the periods of depreciation and amortization for these assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value.

Partner Distributions

Partner incentive allocations, which are determined by the general partner, can be formula-based or discretionary. Partner incentive allocations are treated as compensation expense and recognized in the period in which they are earned. In the event there is insufficient distributable cash flow to make incentive distributions, the general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may determine not to make any distributions called for under the partnership agreement. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations is generally allocated to unit holders based on their pro rata ownership.

Redeemable Partnership Units

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP has the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees or (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

SLP also makes distributions to its partners of various nature including incentive payments, profit distributions and tax distributions.  The profit distributions and tax distributions are accounted for as equity transactions.

Class A Common Stock

The Company’s Class A stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. Also, Class A stockholders are entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared by the Company’s board of directors, out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any statutory or contractual restrictions on the payment of dividends and to any restrictions on the payment of dividends imposed by the terms of any outstanding preferred stock. Dividends consisting of shares of Class A common stock may be paid only as follows: (i) shares of Class A common stock may be paid only to holders of shares of Class A common stock and (ii) shares will be paid proportionately with respect to each outstanding share of the Company’s Class A common stock. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to holders of preferred stock having a liquidation preference, if any, the Class A stockholders will be entitled to share ratably in the Company’s remaining assets available for distribution to Class A stockholders. Class B units of SLP held by principals will be exchangeable for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments for share splits, dividends and reclassifications.

Class B Common Stock

Shares of the Company’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, the Company will issue the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of the Company’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by the Company if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP and the terms of the Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Equity Incentive Plan”). The Company’s Class B stockholders will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s Class B stockholders will not participate in any dividends declared by the Company’s board of directors. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of its assets, Class B stockholders only will be entitled to receive the par value of the Company’s Class B common stock.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASC 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers.  The Company has evaluated the impact of ASC 606 on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  The impact of adopting ASC 606 is de minimis to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and recognition of revenue when compared to the prior year revenue recognition accounting guidance. The new revenue standard requires more comprehensive revenue recognition disclosure in the Company’s notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  

The Company generates revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations, and family office services fees. Management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Performance fees and allocations also relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which the Company has a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which the Company has no partnership interest. Management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees and allocations is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

The discretionary investment management agreements for the Company’s separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for the Company’s private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by the Company upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the investors in the private fund that are not affiliated with the Company, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for the private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) terminates, becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of the Company’s investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from the Company to their clients.

The management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of the Company’s assets under management. The assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into the Company’s various investment strategies and the investment performance of its clients’ accounts. In order to increase the Company’s assets under management and expand its business, the Company must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of its target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. The Company’s ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

• the ability to educate the Company’s target clients about the Company’s classic value investment strategies and provide them with exceptional client service;

• the relative investment performance of the Company’s investment strategies, as compared to competing products and market indices;

• competitive conditions in the investment management and broader financial services sectors;

• investor sentiment and confidence; and

• the decision to close strategies when the Company deems it to be in the best interests of its clients.

The majority of management and advisory fees that the Company earns on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of the management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. The Company’s basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is generally: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance and (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65%. The Company’s fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of the Company’s clients pay a blended fee rate since they are invested in multiple strategies.

Management fees earned on investment funds that the Company advises are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For the Company’s private fund clients, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which the Company performs risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

The Company’s management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

• changes in assets under management due to appreciation or depreciation of its investment portfolios, and the levels of the contribution and withdrawal of assets by new and existing clients;

• allocation of assets under management among its investment strategies, which have different fee schedules;

• allocation of assets under management between separately managed accounts and advised funds, for which the Company generally earns lower overall management and advisory fees; and

• the level of their performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees.

The Company’s performance fees and allocations may fluctuate based on performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees and allocations.

The Company’s family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to its clients. The Company’s dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration and consolidated wealth reporting among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom the Company performs these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

The Company accounts for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606 by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. The Company records performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue once the performance fee or allocation, as applicable, has crystalized. As a result, there is no estimate or variability in the consideration when revenue is recorded.

Transition approach

The Company utilized the modified cumulative effect method as part its adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company recognized the modified cumulative effective of initially applying ASU 2014-09 as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application. As stated above, the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 was immaterial.  This method was applied to either incomplete contracts the revenue of which had not been recognized in accordance with prior revenue guidance as of the date of initial application or all contracts as of, and new contracts after, the date of initial application. As of December 31, 2017, all revenue recognized was for complete contracts of revenue. As a result, there was no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of adoption, which was January 1, 2018.

Equity-Based Compensation

Equity-based compensation cost relating to the issuance of share-based awards to employees is based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant, which is expensed ratably over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may affect the timing of the total amount of expense recognized over the vesting period. The service period is the period over which the employee performs the related services, which is normally the same as the vesting period. Equity-based awards that do not require future service are expensed immediately. Equity-based awards that have the potential to be settled in cash at the election of the employee or prior to the reorganization related to redeemable partnership units are classified as liabilities (“Liability Awards”) and are adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (“ROU”) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the consolidated statement of operations.

The new standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and the Company adopted this standard on this date. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) the effective date of the standard or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. The Company elected to use the effective date as its date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods prior to January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients as part of transition accounting. The Company expects to elect the “package of practical expedients”, which allows the Company to avoid reassessing its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs under the new standard. The Company does not expect to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements as these are not applicable to the Company.

This standard had a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The most significant changes relate to (1) the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for its office equipment and real estate operating leases and (2) providing significant new disclosures about the Company’s leasing activities.

Upon adoption, the Company recognized additional operating liabilities of approximately $44.0 million, with corresponding ROU and other assets based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under current leasing standards for existing operating leases.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting for leases. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for office equipment leases. For those current and prospective leases that qualify as short-term, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

Income Taxes

Silvercrest and SFS are subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which requires an asset and liability approach to the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. SLP is not subject to federal and state income taxes, since all income, gains and losses are passed through to its partners. SLP is, however, subject to New York City unincorporated business tax. With respect to the Company’s incorporated entities, the annual tax rate is based on the income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Judgment is required in determining the tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. The tax effects of any uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns are recognized only if it is “more likely-than-not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest and penalties related to UTPs in income tax expense.

The Company recognizes the benefit of a UTP in the period when it is effectively settled. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination.

Recent Accounting Developments

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments—Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." Although the ASU retains many current requirements, it significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.  Some of the amendments in ASU 2016-01 include the following: (1) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (3) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; and (4) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value, among others. ASU 2016-01 became effective on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Accounting for Credit Losses” which amends the Board’s guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The ASU adds to U.S. GAAP an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. This amendment is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Cash Flow Classification” which amends the guidance in ASC 230 on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Restricted Cash” which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during a reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, The FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 85): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”.  The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.  ASU 2017-01 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2019 and interim reporting periods within that year.  Early adoption is permitted for transactions that have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.  The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, The FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”.  ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing.  An entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination.  Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value.  The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  An entity has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.  ASU 2017-04 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2021 and interim reporting periods within that year.  Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.  The Company expects the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”.  The ASU conforms the derecognition guidance on nonfinancial assets with the model for transactions in the new revenue standard (ASC 606, as amended).  Subtopic 610-20 was issued as part of the new revenue standard. It provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers. The new guidance defines “in substance nonfinancial assets,” unifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets, eliminates rules specifically addressing sales of real estate, removes exceptions to the financial asset derecognition model, and clarifies the accounting for contributions of nonfinancial assets to joint ventures. This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 “Compensation – Stock”.  The ASU amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements.  The ASU provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718.  Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification.  This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract.” The ASU provides guidance for entities to evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement which includes a software license. ASU 2018-15 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company expects the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the SEC issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification. The rule amends certain disclosure requirements that have become redundant, overlapping, outdated or superseded. The rule became effective for the Company’s current quarterly report, with the ability to adopt the changes in the current period, or defer until 2019.  The Company elected to defer the changes to the interim period disclosure rules related to changes to shareholders’ equity until its first quarter report in 2019.

XML

Acquisitions

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Business Combinations [Abstract]

Acquisitions

3. ACQUISITIONS

Neosho:

On December 13, 2018, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Neosho Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Neosho” or the “Seller”), and Christopher K. Richey, Alphonse I. Chan, Robert K. Choi and Vincent G. Pandes, each such individual a principal of Neosho (together, the “Principals of Neosho”), to acquire certain assets of Neosho.  The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 15, 2019 and is referred to herein as the “Neosho Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of investment management and advisory services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) a cash payment of $399 (net of cash acquired) and (2) Class B units of SLP issued to the Principals of Neosho with a value equal to $20 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,686, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved.  SAMG LLC will make a payment of $300 to the Principals of Neosho on the first anniversary of the closing date.  SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Neosho as soon as practicable following December 31, 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023, in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $100,000 and (ii) the product obtained by multiplying (x) 50% by (y) the revenue of Neosho as of such payment date less the revenue of Neosho as of the immediately preceding payment date for the prior year.   Earnout payments will be paid 75% in cash and 25% in equity.  The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

The Company has a liability of $1,686 related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Neosho Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2019 for contingent consideration.

Cappiccille:

On December 15, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Cappiccille & Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Cappiccille” or the “Seller”), and Michael Cappiccille (the “Principal”), to acquire certain assets of Cappiccille.  The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on January 11, 2016 and is referred to herein as the “Cappiccille Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, a provider of tax services, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets, and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principal. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principal an aggregate purchase price consisting of a cash payment of $148. The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $354, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved.  SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principal as soon as practicable following December 31, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and during 2020, in an amount equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the business and assets of Cappiccille, based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2016 shall be equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille for the period between the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition and December 31, 2016 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to 19% of the revenue attributable to the Cappiccille Acquisition for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Cappiccille Acquisition.  The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected revenue for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected revenue was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.

The Company has a liability of $126 and $231 related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Cappiccille Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, for contingent consideration.  

Jamison:

On March 30, 2015, the Company executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, SLP, SAMG LLC (the “Buyer”) and Jamison Eaton & Wood, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (“Jamison” or the “Seller”), and Keith Wood, Ernest Cruikshank, III, William F. Gadsden and Frederick E. Thalmann, Jr., each such individual a principal of Jamison (together, the “Principals of Jamison”), to acquire certain assets of Jamison.  The transaction contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement closed on June 30, 2015 and is referred to herein as the “Jamison Acquisition”.

Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC acquired (i) substantially all of the business and assets of the Seller, an investment adviser, including goodwill and the benefit of the amortization of goodwill related to such assets, and (ii) the personal goodwill of the Principals of Jamison. In consideration of the purchased assets and goodwill, SAMG LLC paid to the Seller and the Principals of Jamison an aggregate purchase price consisting of (1) cash payments in the aggregate amount of $3,550 (the “Closing Cash Payment”), (2) a promissory note issued to the Seller in the principal amount of $394, with an interest rate of 5% per annum (the “Seller Note”), (3) promissory notes in varying amounts issued to each of the Principals of Jamison for an aggregated total amount of $1,771, each with an interest rate of 5% per annum (together, the “Principals of Jamison Notes”) and (4) Class B units of SLP (the “Class B Units”) issued to the Principals of Jamison with a value equal to $3,562 and an equal number of shares of Class B common stock of the Company, having voting rights but no economic interest (together, the “Equity Consideration”). The Company determined that the acquisition-date fair value of the contingent consideration was $1,429, based on the likelihood that the financial and performance targets described in the Asset Purchase Agreement will be achieved.  SAMG LLC will make earnout payments to the Principals of Jamison as soon as practicable following December 31, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and during 2020, in an amount equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the business and assets of Jamison (the “Jamison Business”), based on revenue gained or lost post-transaction during the twelve months ended on the applicable determination date, except that the earnout payment for 2015 shall be equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition and December 31, 2015 and the earnout payment for 2020 shall be equal to 20% of the EBITDA attributable to the Jamison Business for the period between January 1, 2020 and the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Jamison Acquisition.  The estimated fair value of contingent consideration is recognized at the date of acquisition, and adjusted for changes in facts and circumstances until the ultimate resolution of the contingency. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration are reflected as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the contingent consideration was based on discounted cash flow models using projected EBITDA for each earnout period. The discount rate applied to the projected EBITDA was determined based on the weighted average cost of capital for the Company and took into account that the overall risk associated with the payments was similar to the overall risks of the Company as there is no target, floor or cap associated the contingent payments.  

The Company has a liability of $204 and $524 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, related to earnout payments to be made in conjunction with the Jamison Acquisition which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for contingent consideration.

In connection with their receipt of the Equity Consideration, the Principals of Jamison became subject to the rights and obligations set forth in the limited partnership agreement of SLP and are entitled to distributions consistent with SLP’s distribution policy.  In addition, the Principals of Jamison became parties to the Exchange Agreement, which governs the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company, the Resale and Registration Rights Agreement, which provides the Principals of Jamison with liquidity with respect to shares of Class A common stock of the Company received in exchange for Class B Units, and the TRA of the Company, which entitles the Principals of Jamison to share in a portion of the tax benefit received by the Company upon the exchange of Class B Units for Class A common stock of the Company.

The Asset Purchase Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.

The strategic acquisition of Jamison, a long-standing and highly regarded investment boutique, strengthened the Company’s presence in the greater New York market and the Company gained investment managers that have significantexperience and knowledge of the industry.  Jamison’s clients gained access to the Company’s complete investment management, wealth planning and reporting capabilities, including proprietary value equity and fixed income disciplines and alternative investment advisory services.

The Company believes the recorded goodwill is supported by the anticipated revenues and expected synergies of integrating the operations of Jamison into the Company.  The goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

XML

Investments and Fair Value Measurements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Investments and Fair Value Measurements

4.INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Investments

Investments include $1,493 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, representing the Company’s interests in the Silvercrest Funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates. The Company’s financial interest in these funds can range in amounts up to 2% of the net assets of the funds. Despite the Company’s insignificant financial interest, the Company applies the equity method to account for its interests in affiliated investment funds because it exercises significant influence over these funds as the Company typically serves as the general partner, managing member or equivalent for these funds. During 2007, the Silvercrest Funds granted rights to the unaffiliated investors in each respective fund to provide that a simple majority of the fund’s unaffiliated investors will have the right, without cause, to remove the general partner or equivalent of that fund or to accelerate the liquidation date of that fund in accordance with certain procedures. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company determined that none of the Silvercrest Funds were required to be consolidated.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment, the characteristics specific to the investment and the state of the marketplace including the existence and transparency of transactions between market participants. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in an orderly market generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.

• Level I: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments as of the reporting date. The type of investments in Level I include listed equities and listed derivatives.

• Level II: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies. Investments which are generally included in Level II include corporate bonds and loans, less liquid and restricted equity securities, certain over-the counter derivatives, and certain fund of hedge funds investments in which the Company has the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date.

• Level III: Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation. Investments that are included in Level III generally include general and limited partnership interests in private equity and real estate funds, credit-oriented funds, certain over-the-counter derivatives, funds of hedge funds which use net asset value per share to determine fair value in which the Company may not have the ability to redeem its investment at net asset value at, or within three months of, the reporting date, distressed debt and non-investment grade residual interests in securitizations and collateralized debt obligations.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given investment is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the investment.

At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, financial instruments that are not held at fair value are categorized in the table below:

	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value Hierarchy
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,494	$	45,494	$	69,283	$	69,283		Level I	(1)
Investments	$	1,493	$	1,493	$	1,493	$	1,493		N/A	(2)

(1) Includes $17,307 and $17,200 of cash equivalents at March 31,2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, that fall under Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

(2) Investments consist of the Company’s equity method investments in affiliated investment funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates.  Fair value of investments is based on the net asset value of the affiliated investment funds which is a practical expedient for fair value, which is not included in the fair value hierarchy under GAAP.

(3) The carrying value of notes payable and borrowings under the revolving credit agreement approximates fair value, which is determined based on interest rates currently available to the Company for similar debt.

XML

Receivables, Net

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Receivables [Abstract]

Receivables, Net

5. RECEIVABLES, NET

The following is a summary of receivables as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Management and advisory fees receivable	$	3,843		$	3,358
Unbilled receivables		3,128			3,036
Other receivables		2			2,249
Receivables		6,973			8,643
Allowance for doubtful receivables		(621	)		(621	)
Receivables, net	$	6,352		$	8,022

XML

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net

6. FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, NET

The following is a summary of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Leasehold improvements	$	5,285		$	5,229
Furniture and equipment		5,458			6,022
Artwork		485			483
Total cost		11,228			11,734
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(7,966	)		(8,298	)
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	3,262		$	3,436

Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $163 and $188, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company wrote off leased assets of $310 that were fully depreciated as of March 31, 2019.  

XML

Goodwill

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Goodwill [Abstract]

Goodwill

7. GOODWILL

The following is a summary of the changes to the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Beginning
Gross balance	$	42,583		$	42,583
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance		25,168			25,168
Acquisition of Neosho		2,184			─
Ending
Gross balance		44,767			42,583
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance	$	27,352		$	25,168

XML

Intangible Assets, Net

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Intangible Assets Net Excluding Goodwill [Abstract]

Intangible Assets, Net

8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

The following is a summary of intangible assets as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	Customer Relationships			Other Intangible Assets			Total
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Balance, March 31, 2019		22,560			2,467			25,027
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2019		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Amortization expense		(308	)		(40	)		(348	)
Balance, March 31, 2019		(13,195	)		(2,287	)		(15,482	)
Net book value	$	9,365		$	180		$	9,545
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2018	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Balance, December 31, 2018		22,560			2,467			25,027
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2018		(11,367	)		(2,082	)		(13,449	)
Amortization expense		(1,520	)		(165	)		(1,685	)
Balance, December 31, 2018		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Net Book Value	$	9,673		$	220		$	9,893

Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $348 and $425 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Amortization related to the Company’s finite life intangible assets is scheduled to be expensed over the next five years and thereafter as follows:

2019 (remainder of)	$	1,042
2020		1,299
2021		1,196
2022		1,142
2023		983
Thereafter		3,883
Total	$	9,545

XML

Debt

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Debt Disclosure [Abstract]

Debt

9. DEBT

Credit Facility

On June 24, 2013, the subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. entered into a $15.0 million credit facility with City National Bank. The subsidiaries of Silvercrest L.P. are the borrowers under such facility and Silvercrest L.P. guarantees the obligations of its subsidiaries under the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by certain assets of Silvercrest L.P. and its subsidiaries. The credit facility consists of a $7.5 million delayed draw term loan that matures on June 24, 2025 and a $7.5 million revolving credit facility that was scheduled to mature on December 21, 2018.  On June 22, 2018, the revolving credit facility was extended to June 21, 2019.   The loan bears interest at either (a) the higher of the prime rate plus a margin of 0.05 percentage points and 2.5% or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 3 percentage points, at the borrowers’ option.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, no amount has been drawn on the term loan credit facility.  On June 22, 2018, the term loan was amended to extend the draw date to June 25, 2023 and to extend the maturity date to June 24, 2025. The borrowers are able to draw up to the full amount of the term loan through June 25, 2023. Borrowings under the term loan on or prior to June 24, 2020 are payable in 20 equal quarterly installments.  Borrowings under the term loan after June 24, 2020 will be payable in equal quarterly installments through the maturity date. The credit facility contains restrictions on, among other things, (i) incurrence of additional debt, (ii) creating liens on certain assets, (iii) making certain investments, (iv) consolidating, merging or otherwise disposing of substantially all of our assets, (v) the sale of certain assets, and (vi) entering into transactions with affiliates. In addition, the credit facility contains certain financial covenants including a test on discretionary assets under management, maximum debt to EBITDA and a fixed charge coverage ratio. The credit facility contains customary events of default, including the occurrence of a change in control which includes a person or group of persons acting together acquiring more than 30% of the total voting securities of Silvercrest.

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company did not have any outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

Interest expense, which also includes amortization of deferred financing fees, incurred on the revolving credit facility and term loan for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $7 and $4, respectively.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

The Company leases office space pursuant to operating leases that are subject to specific escalation clauses. Rent expense charged to operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $1,529 and $1,511, respectively. The Company received sub-lease income from sub-tenants during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 of $32 and $75, respectively. Therefore, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, net rent expense amounted to $1,497 and $1,436, respectively, and is included in general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As security for performance under the leases, the Company is required to maintain letters of credit in favor of the landlord totaling $506 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.  Furthermore, the Company maintains an $80 letter of credit in favor of its Boston landlord. Both are collateralized by the Company’s revolving credit facility with City National Bank.

In March 2014, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office space in Richmond, VA.  The lease commenced on May 1, 2014 and expires July 31, 2019. The lease is subject to escalation clauses and provides for a rent-free period of three months.  Monthly rent expense is $5.  The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $3.  In September 2016, the Company entered into Lease Amendment Number One (“Amendment Number One”) to expand its space and extend its lease.  This expansion was to occur on or about October 1, 2017, and the lease was extended to November 30, 2024.  The lease was further amended on January 16, 2018 (“Amendment Number Two”) to update the expansion date to January 12, 2018 and to extend the term of the lease to November 30, 2028.  The amended lease provides for a rent credit of $40.  Monthly rent expense under the amended lease is $10.

In June 2015, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Charlottesville, VA.  The lease commenced on June 30, 2015 and expired on June 30, 2018.  The Company extended this lease for one year, with the new term beginning on July 1, 2018 and expiring on June 30, 2019.  Monthly rent expense is $2.  The Company paid a refundable security deposit of $2.

In connection with the Jamison Acquisition, the Company assumed lease agreements for office space in Bedminster and Princeton, NJ.  The Bedminster lease, as extended, expires on March 31, 2022.  Monthly rent expense on this lease is $11.  The Princeton lease, as extended, expired on April 30, 2016.  Monthly rent expense on this lease was $5.  Both leases are subject to escalation clauses, and the Bedminster lease provides for a rent-free period of four months.

In December 2015, the Company extended its lease related to its New York City office space.  The amended lease commenced on October 1, 2017 and expires on September 30, 2028.  The lease is subject to escalation clauses, and provides for a rent-free period of twelve months and for tenant improvements of up to $2,080.  Monthly rent under this extension is $446.

In January 2016, the Company entered into a lease agreement for office space in Princeton, NJ.  The lease commenced April 23, 2016 and expires on August 31, 2022.  This lease replaces the Princeton lease discussed above that expired on April 30, 2016.  Monthly rent expense on this lease is $6.  The lease is subject to escalation clauses, and provides for a rent-free period of five months.

With the Cappiccille Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in Livingston, NJ.  The lease is month-to-month.  Monthly rent expense is $2.

In January 2018, the Company extended its lease related to its Boston, MA office space.  The amended lease commenced on January 1, 2018 and expires on April 30, 2023.  The lease provides for a rent-free period of one month.  Monthly rent under this extension is $33.

With the Neosho Acquisition, the Company assumed a lease agreement for office space in La Jolla, CA.  The lease expires January 31, 2020.  Monthly rent expense is $3.

Future minimum lease payments and rentals under lease agreements which expire through 2028 are as follows:

	Minimum Lease Commitments		Non-cancellable Subleases			Minimum Net Rentals
Remainder of 2019	$	4,657	$	(55	)	$	4,602
2020		6,183		(34	)		6,149
2021		6,193		(35	)		6,158
2022		6,076		(35	)		6,041
2023		5,770		(6	)		5,764
Thereafter		27,827		—			27,827
Total	$	56,706	$	(165	)	$	56,541
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (months)							111.1
Weighted-average discount rate							4.3	%

The Company has finance leases for certain office equipment. The Company entered into a finance lease agreement for a telephone system during 2014.  The amount financed was $321 and the lease has a term of five years, which began on March 1, 2014.   Monthly minimum lease payments were $5, and continued through November 30, 2018.   On June 30, 2015, the Company assumed certain finance leases for equipment totaling $253 as part of the Jamison Acquisition.  In July 2015, the Company entered into a finance lease for a copier.  The amount financed was $21 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on July 1, 2015.  Monthly minimum lease payments were $1, and continued through June 30, 2018.  In October 2015, the Company entered in a finance lease for a copier.  The amount financed was $18 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on November 1, 2015.  Monthly minimum lease payments were $1, and continued through October 31, 2018.  In January 2017, the Company entered into a finance lease agreement for a copier.  The amount financed was $11 and the lease has a term of two years, which began on January 1, 2017.  Monthly minimum lease payments were $1, and continued through December 31, 2018.  In January 2017, the Company entered into a finance lease agreement for two copiers.  The amount financed was $152 and the lease has a term of five years, which began on February 1, 2017.  Monthly minimum lease payments are $3, and continue through January 31, 2022.  In July 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement for four copiers.  The amount financed was $72 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on July 1, 2017.  Monthly minimum lease payments are $2, and continue through June 30, 2020.  In March 2018, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a copier.  The amount financed was $11 and the lease has a term of three years, which began on March 1, 2018.  Monthly minimum lease payments are $0.3, and continue through February 28, 2021. The aggregate principal balance of finance leases was $182 and $188 as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The assets relating to finance leases that are included in equipment as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Finance lease assets included in furniture and equipment	$	588		$	605
Finance lease assets included in software		—			58
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(408	)		(462	)
	$	180		$	201

Depreciation expense relating to finance lease assets was $31 and $21 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  

Future minimum lease payments under finance leases are as follows:

	Future Minimum Lease Commitments
Remainder of 2019	$	67
2020		75
2021		37
2022		3
2023		—
Total	$	182
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases (months)		27.1
Weighted-average discount rate		4.0	%

XML

Equity

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Equity [Abstract]

Equity

11. EQUITY

SLP historically made, and will continue to make, distributions of its net income to the holders of its partnership units for income tax purposes as required under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement and also made, and will continue to make, additional distributions of net income under the terms of its Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement.  Partnership distributions totaled $2,285 and $2,072, for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  

Pursuant to SLP’s Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement, partner incentive allocations are treated as distributions of net income. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations was generally allocated to the partners based on their pro rata ownership. Net income allocation is subject to the recovery of the allocated losses of prior periods. Distributions of partner incentive allocations of net income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $27,199 and $24,935, respectively. The distributions are included in non-controlling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.  The Company treats SLP’s partner incentive allocations as compensation expense and accrues such amounts when earned.  During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, SLP accrued partner incentive allocations of $5,178 and $6,763, respectively.      

Silvercrest—Equity

Silvercrest has the following authorized and outstanding equity:

	Shares at March 31, 2019
	Authorized		Outstanding		Voting Rights	Economic Rights
Common shares
Class A, par value $0.01 per share		50,000,000		8,535,170	1 vote per share (1), (2)	All (1), (2)
Class B, par value $0.01 per share		25,000,000		4,918,545	1 vote per share (3), (4)	None (3), (4)
Preferred shares
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share		10,000,000		—	See footnote (5) below	See footnote (5) below

(1) Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Class A common stockholders have 100% of the rights of all classes of Silvercrest’s capital stock to receive dividends.

(2) During 2016, Silvercrest granted 10,582 restricted stock units which will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest, of which 3,791 remain unvested as of March 31, 2019.

(3) Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share.

(4) Each Class B unit of SLP held by a principal is exchangeable for one share of the Company’s Class A common stock. The principals collectively hold 4,918,545 Class B units, which represent the right to receive their proportionate share of the distributions made by SLP, and 243,523 restricted stock units which will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP.  The 243,523 restricted stock units which have been issued to our principals entitle the holders thereof to participate in distributions from SLP as if the underlying Class B units are outstanding and thus are taken into account to determine the economic interest of each holder of units in SLP. However, because the Class B units underlying the restricted stock units have not been issued and are not deemed outstanding, the holders of restricted stock units have no voting rights with respect to those Class B units. Silvercrest will not issue shares of Class B common stock in respect of restricted stock units of SLP until such time that the underlying Class B units are issued.

(5) Silvercrest’s board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock in one or more classes or series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and related restrictions, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any class or series, or the designation of the class or series, without the approval of its stockholders.

Silvercrest is dependent on cash generated by SLP to fund any dividends. Generally, SLP will distribute its profits to all of its partners, including Silvercrest, based on the proportionate ownership each holds in SLP. Silvercrest will fund dividends to its stockholders from its proportionate share of those distributions after provision for its income taxes and other obligations.

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, Silvercrest issued the following shares:

Class A Common Stock

	Transaction	# of
	Date	Shares
Class A common stock outstanding - January 1, 2019			8,518,096
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March 2019		17,074
Class A common shares outstanding – March 31, 2019			8,535,170

Class B Common Stock

	Transaction	# of
	Date	Shares
Class B common stock outstanding - January 1, 2019			4,934,103
Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Neosho Acquisition	January 2019		1,516
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March 2019		(17,074	)
Class B common shares outstanding – March 31, 2019			4,918,545

In January 2019, the Company issued 1,516 shares of Class B common stock to certain Principals of Neosho in connection with the Neosho Acquisition.

In March 2019, the Company redeemed from certain existing partners 17,074 shares of Class B common stock in connection with the exchange of a like number of Class B units to Class A common stock pursuant to the resale and registration rights agreement between the Company and its principals.

The total amount of shares of Class B common stock outstanding and held by principals equals the number of Class B units those individuals hold in SLP. Shares of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, Silvercrest will issue to the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of Silvercrest’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by Silvercrest if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP, the terms of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan of Silvercrest, or otherwise.

XML

Notes Receivable from Partners

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Receivables [Abstract]

Notes Receivable from Partners

12. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM PARTNERS

Partner contributions to SLP are made in cash, in the form of five or six year interest-bearing promissory notes and/or in the form of nine year interest-bearing limited recourse promissory notes. Limited recourse promissory notes were issued in January 2008 and August 2009 with interest rates of 3.53% and 2.77%, respectively. The recourse limitation includes a stated percentage of the initial principal amount of the limited recourse note plus a stated percentage of the accreted principal amount as of the date upon which all amounts due are paid in full plus all costs and expenses required to be paid by the borrower and all amounts required to be paid pursuant to a pledge agreement associated with each note issued. Certain notes receivable are payable in annual installments and are collateralized by SLP’s units that are purchased with the note. Notes receivable from partners are reflected as a reduction of non-controlling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Notes receivable from partners are as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Beginning balance	$	924		$	1,918
New note receivable issued to partners					100
Repayment of notes		(291	)		(1,119	)
Interest accrued and capitalized on notes receivable		3			25
Ending balance	$	636		$	924

Full recourse notes receivable from partners as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are $636 and $924, respectively. There were no limited recourse notes receivable from partners as of March 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018. There is no allowance for credit losses on notes receivable from partners as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

XML

Related Party Transactions

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Related Party Transactions [Abstract]

Related Party Transactions

13. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the first three months of 2019 and 2018, the Company provided services to the following, which operate as feeder funds investing through master-feeder or mini-master feeder structures:

• the domesticated Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund, L.P. (formed in 2011 and formerly Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund),

• Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund (International), Ltd. (which invests through Silvercrest Hedged Equity Fund, L.P.),

• the domesticated Silvercrest Emerging Markets Fund, L.P. (formed in 2011 and formerly Silvercrest Emerging Markets Fund),

• Silvercrest Market Neutral Fund (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Market Neutral Fund (International) (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Master Fund LLC,

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio A LLC,

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio P LLC,

• Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio S LLC (formed in 2015),

• the Silvercrest Jefferson Fund, L.P. (formed in 2014), and

• the Silvercrest Jefferson Fund, Ltd. (the Company took over as investment manager in 2014, formerly known as the Jefferson Global Growth Fund, Ltd.), which invests in Silvercrest Jefferson Master Fund, L.P. (formed in 2014).

The Company also provides services to the following, which operate and invest separately as stand-alone funds:

• the Silvercrest Global Opportunities Fund, L.P. (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Global Opportunities Fund (International), Ltd. (currently in liquidation),

• Silvercrest Municipal Special Situations Fund LLC (merged into Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio S LLC in 2015),

• Silvercrest Municipal Special Situations Fund II LLC (merged into Silvercrest Municipal Advantage Portfolio S LLC in 2015),

• Silvercrest Select Growth Equity Fund, L.P. (liquidated as of December 31, 2015),

• Silvercrest International Fund, L.P. (previously known as Silvercrest Global Fund, L.P.),

• Silvercrest Small Cap Fund, L.P. (liquidated as of December 31, 2016),

• Silvercrest Special Situations Fund, L.P., and

• Silvercrest Commodity Strategies Fund, L.P. (liquidated as of December 31, 2017).

Pursuant to agreements with the above entities, the Company provides investment advisory services and receives an annual management fee of 0% to 1.75% of assets under management and a performance fee or allocation of 0% to 10% of the above entities’ net appreciation over a high-water mark.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company earned from the above activities management fee income, which is included in “Management and advisory fees” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, of $1,263 and $1,589, respectively.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company was owed $1,417 and $1,233, respectively, from its various funds, which is included in Due from Silvercrest Funds on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company earned management and advisory fees of $291 and $298, respectively, from assets managed on behalf of certain of its employees.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company is owed approximately $3 and $3 from certain of its employees, which is included in Receivables, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

XML

Income Taxes

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]

Income Taxes

14. INCOME TAXES

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had net deferred tax assets of $11,753, which is recorded as a deferred tax asset of $11,846 specific to Silvercrest which consists primarily of assets related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets related to its acquisition of partnership units of SLP, a deferred tax asset of $5 specific to SLP which consists primarily of assets related to deferred rent expenses offset in part by amounts for differences in the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets and a deferred tax liability of $88 related to the corporate activity of SFS which is primarily related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets.  Of the total net deferred taxes at March 31, 2019, $35 of the net deferred tax liabilities relate to non-controlling interests. These amounts are included in prepaid expenses and other assets and deferred tax and other liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition, respectively.      

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had a net deferred tax asset of $12,093, which is recorded as a net deferred tax asset of $12,206 specific to Silvercrest, which consists primarily of net assets related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangibles related to its acquisition of partnership units of SLP, a net deferred tax liability of $20 specific to SLP which consists primarily of liabilities related to differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets, and a net deferred tax liability of $93 related to the corporate activity of SFS which is primarily related to temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of intangible assets.  

The current tax expense was $614 and $1,161 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Of the amount for the three months ended March 31, 2019, $182 relates to Silvercrest’s corporate tax expense, $431 relates to SLP’s state and local liability and $1 relates to SFS’s corporate tax expense.  The deferred tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $409 and $130, respectively.  When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is $1,023 and $1,291, respectively.  There was no material discrete tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

The current tax expense decreased from the comparable period in 2018 mainly due to decreased profitability and favorable timing differences related to various deferred assets recorded at SLP.

Of the total current tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, $163 and $228, respectively, relates to non-controlling interests.  Of the deferred tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, ($7) and ($16), respectively, relates to non-controlling interests.  When combined with current tax expense, the total income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 related to non-controlling interests is $156 and $212, respectively.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by federal, state, and local tax regulators. As of March 31, 2019, the Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for the years 2015 through 2019 are open under the normal three-year statute of limitations and therefore subject to examination.

The guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company does not believe that it has any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within the next twelve months.  Furthermore, the Company does not have any material uncertain tax positions at March 31, 2019 and 2018.

XML

Redeemable Partnership Units

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Redeemable Partnership Units [Abstract]

Redeemable Partnership Units

15. REDEEMABLE PARTNERSHIP UNITS

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP would have the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees and (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

XML

Equity-Based Compensation

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]

Equity-Based Compensation

16. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options

On November 2, 2012, the Company’s board of directors adopted the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

A total of 1,687,500 shares were originally reserved and available for issuance under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. As of March 31, 2019, 584,679 shares are available for grant. The equity interests may be issued in the form of shares of the Company’s Class A common stock and Class B units of SLP. (All references to units or interests of SLP refer to Class B units of SLP and accompanying shares of Class B common stock of Silvercrest).

The purposes of the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan are to (i) align the long-term financial interests of our employees, directors, consultants and advisers with those of our stockholders; (ii) attract and retain those individuals by providing compensation opportunities that are consistent with our compensation philosophy; and (iii) provide incentives to those individuals who contribute significantly to our long-term performance and growth. To accomplish these purposes, the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of units of SLP. The 2012 Equity Incentive Plan also provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, performance-based stock awards and other stock-based awards (collectively, stock awards) based on our Class A common stock. Awards may be granted to employees, including officers, members, limited partners or partners who are engaged in the business of one or more of our subsidiaries, as well as non-employee directors and consultants.

The Compensation Committee may impose vesting conditions and awards may be forfeited if the vesting conditions are not met. During the period that any vesting restrictions apply, unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee, the recipient of awards that vest in the form of units of SLP will be eligible to participate in distributions of income from SLP. In addition, before the vesting conditions have been satisfied, the transferability of such units is generally prohibited and such units will not be eligible to be exchanged for cash or shares of our Class A common stock.

In August 2015, the Company granted 966,510 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.23 per share to existing Class B unit holders.  These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP.  Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,791 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to existing Class B unit holders.  These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP. Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.  

In May 2016, the Company granted 3,000 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to certain members of the Board of Directors.  These RSUs vested and settled in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest.  One hundred percent of the RSUs granted vested and settled on the first anniversary of the grant date.

In May 2016, the Company granted 7,582 RSUs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan at a fair value of $13.19 per share to an employee.  These RSUs will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest.  Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

In October 2018, the Company granted 105,398 non-qualified stock options (“NQOs”) under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder.  The fair value of the NQOs has been derived using the Black-Scholes method with the following assumptions:  Strike price of $13.97, Risk Free rate of 2.94% (5-year treasury rate), expiration of 5 years and volatility of 32.7%.  Additionally, the calculation of the compensation expense assumes a forfeiture rate of 1.0%, based on historical experience.  These NQOs will vest and become exercisable into of Class B units of SLP.  One third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded compensation expense related to such RSUs and NQOs of $842 and $800, respectively, as part of total compensation expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period then ended.  As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was $1,550 and $2,392, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.26 and 1.51 years, respectively.

A summary of the RSU grants by the Company as of March 31, 2019 and 2018 is presented below:

	Restricted Stock Units Granted
	Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		247,316	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at March 31, 2019		247,316	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at January 1, 2018		491,786	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at March 31, 2018		491,786	$	13.19 – 13.23

A summary of the NQO grants by the Company as of March 31, 2019 is presented below:

	Non-Qualified Options Granted
	Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		105,398	$	13.97
Total granted at March 31, 2019		105,398	$	13.97

XML

Defined Contribution and Deferred Compensation Plans

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Postemployment Benefits [Abstract]

Defined Contribution and Deferred Compensation Plans

17. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS

SAMG LLC has a defined contribution 401(k) savings plan (the “Plan”) for all eligible employees who meet the minimum age and service requirements as defined in the Plan. The Plan is designed to be a qualified plan under sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. For employees who qualify under the terms of the Plan, on an annual basis Silvercrest matches dollar for dollar an employee’s contributions up to the first 4% of compensation. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, Silvercrest made matching contributions of $22 and $19, respectively, for the benefit of employees.

XML

Soft Dollar Arrangements

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Disclosure Soft Dollar Arrangements Additional Information Detail [Abstract]

Soft Dollar Arrangements

18. SOFT DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS

The Company obtains research and other services through “soft dollar” arrangements. The Company receives credits from broker-dealers whereby technology-based research, market quotation and/or market survey services are effectively paid for in whole or in part by “soft dollar” brokerage arrangements. Section 28(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provides a “safe harbor” to an investment adviser against claims that it breached its fiduciary duty under state or federal law (including ERISA) solely because the adviser caused its clients’ accounts to pay more than the lowest available commission for executing a securities trade in return for brokerage and research services. To rely on the safe harbor offered by Section 28(e), (i) the Company must make a good-faith determination that the amount of commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services being received and (ii) the brokerage and research services must provide lawful and appropriate assistance to the Company in carrying out its investment decision-making responsibilities. If the use of soft dollars is limited or prohibited in the future by regulation, the Company may have to bear the costs of such research and other services. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company utilized “soft dollar” credits of $193 and $193, respectively.

XML

Subsequent Events

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 12, 2019, SAMG LLC and SLP entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Cortina Asset Management, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Cortina”), and certain interest holders of Cortina (the “Principals”) to acquire, directly or through a designated affiliate, substantially all of the assets of Cortina relating to Cortina’s business of providing investment management, investment advisory, and related services.

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement, SAMG LLC agreed to pay to Cortina an aggregate maximum amount of $44,937, 80% of which shall be paid in cash at closing (which is anticipated to occur no later than 120 days from the date of the Purchase Agreement) by SAMG LLC, and 20% of which shall be paid by SLP in the form of issuance and delivery to certain Principals at closing of Class B Units in SLP, in each case subject to certain adjustments as described in the Purchase Agreement. In addition, the Purchase Agreement provides for up to an additional $26,209 to be paid 80% in cash with certain Principals receiving the remaining 20% in the form of Class B Units of SLP in potential earn-out payments over the next four years.

The foregoing description of the Purchase Agreement is only a summary, does not purport to be complete, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Purchase Agreement, which is attached as Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by Silvercrest on April 15, 2019.

On May 1, 2019, the Company granted 34,338 RSUs and 60,742 NQOs under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to an existing Class B unit holder of SLP.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Silvercrest and its wholly owned subsidiaries SLP, SAMG LLC, SFS, MCG, Silvercrest Investors LLC, Silvercrest Investors II LLC and Silvercrest Investors III LLC as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.  All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at December 31, 2018 was derived from the audited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2019 and 2018 or any future period.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included herein are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial position and results, have been made. The Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes should be read together with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The Company evaluates for consolidation those entities it controls through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those Silvercrest Funds over which the general partner or equivalent is presumed to have control, e.g. by virtue of the limited partners not being able to remove the general partner. The initial step in the Company’s determination of whether a fund for which SLP is the general partner is required to be consolidated is assessing whether the fund is a variable interest entity or a voting interest entity.

SLP then considers whether the fund is a voting interest entity (“VoIE”) in which the unaffiliated limited partners have substantive “kick-out” rights that provide the ability to dissolve (liquidate) the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause. SLP considers the “kick-out” rights to be substantive if the general partner for the fund can be removed by the vote of a simple majority of the unaffiliated limited partners and there are no significant barriers to the unaffiliated limited partners’ ability to exercise these rights in that among other things, (1) there are no conditions or timing limits on when the rights can be exercised, (2) there are no financial or operational barriers associated with replacing the general partner, (3) there are a number of qualified replacement investment advisors that would accept appointment at the same fee level, (4) each fund’s documents provide for the ability to call and conduct a vote, and (5) the information necessary to exercise the kick-out rights and related vote are available from the fund and its administrator.

If the fund is a variable interest entity, SLP then determines whether it has a variable interest in the fund, and if so, whether SLP is the primary beneficiary. 

During the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, each fund is deemed to be a VoIE and neither SLP nor Silvercrest consolidated any of the Silvercrest Funds.

Non-controlling Interest

Non-controlling Interest

As of March 31, 2019, Silvercrest holds approximately 63.3% of the economic interests in SLP. Silvercrest is the sole general partner of SLP and, therefore, controls the management of SLP. As a result, Silvercrest consolidates the financial position and the results of operations of SLP and its subsidiaries, and records a non-controlling interest, as a separate component of equity on its Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition for the remaining economic interests in SLP. The non-controlling interest in the income or loss of SLP is included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as a reduction or addition to net income derived from SLP.

Segment Reporting

Segment Reporting

The Company views its operations as comprising one operating segment. Each of the Company’s acquired businesses has similar economic characteristics and has been or is in the process of being fully integrated. Furthermore, our chief operating decision maker, who is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, monitors and reviews financial information at a consolidated level for assessing operating results and the allocation of resources.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenses and other income reported in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, determination of equity-based compensation, accounting for income taxes, determination of the useful lives of long-lived assets and other matters that affect the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid securities with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Equity Method Investments

Equity Method Investments

Entities and investments, the activities over which the Company exercises significant influence, but which do not meet the requirements for consolidation, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, whereby the Company records its share of the underlying income or losses of these entities. Intercompany profit arising from transactions with affiliates is eliminated to the extent of its beneficial interest. Equity in losses of equity method investments is not recognized after the carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans, has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other funding obligations exist.

The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of such investments may not be recoverable. The difference between the carrying value of the equity method investment and its estimated fair value is recognized as an impairment when the loss in value is deemed other than temporary. The Company’s equity method investments approximate their fair value at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The fair value of the equity method investments is estimated based on the Company’s share of the fair value of the net assets of the equity method investee. No impairment charges related to equity method investments were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2019 or 2018.

Receivables and Due from Silvercrest Funds

Receivables and Due from Silvercrest Funds

Receivables consist primarily of amounts for management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations and family office service fees due from clients, and are stated as net realizable value. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful receivables based on estimates of expected losses and specific identification of uncollectible accounts. The Company charges actual losses to the allowance when incurred.

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements consist primarily of furniture, fixtures and equipment, computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements and are recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives, which for leasehold improvements is the lesser of the lease term or the life of the asset, generally 10 years, and 3 to 7 years for other fixed assets.

Business Combinations

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition method of accounting requires that the purchase price, including the fair value of contingent consideration, of the acquisition be allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed using the fair values determined by management as of the acquisition date. Contingent consideration is recorded as part of the purchase price when such contingent consideration is not based on continuing employment of the selling shareholders. Contingent consideration that is related to continuing employment is recorded as compensation expense. Payments made for contingent consideration recorded as part of an acquisition’s purchase price are reflected as financing activities in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The Company remeasures the fair value of contingent consideration at each reporting period using a probability-adjusted discounted cash flow method based on significant inputs not observable in the market and any change in the fair value from either the passage of time or events occurring after the acquisition date, is recorded in earnings. Contingent consideration payments that exceed the acquisition date fair value of the contingent consideration are reflected as an operating activity in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired, including intangibles, and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. The Company generally uses valuation specialists to perform appraisals and assist in the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These valuations require management to make estimates and assumptions that are critical in determining the fair values of the assets and liabilities. During the measurement period, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Any adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period are recorded in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized and is generally evaluated for impairment using a two-step process that is performed at least annually, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred.

The Company accounts for Goodwill under Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other,” which provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment of whether a reporting unit’s fair value is more likely than not less than its carrying value, including goodwill. In performing its qualitative assessment, an entity considers the extent to which adverse events or circumstances identified, such as changes in economic conditions, industry and market conditions or entity specific events, could affect the comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount. If an entity concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not less than its carrying amount, the entity is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and, accordingly, measure the amount, if any, of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit. The Company utilized this option when performing its annual impairment assessment in 2018 and 2017 and concluded that its single reporting unit’s fair value was more likely than not greater than its carrying value, including goodwill.

The Company has one reporting unit at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. No goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 20 years. The method of amortization is based on the pattern over which the economic benefits, generally expected undiscounted cash flows, of the intangible asset are consumed. Intangible assets for which no pattern can be reliably determined are amortized using the straight-line method. Intangible assets consist primarily of the contractual right to future management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations from customer contracts or relationships.

Long-lived Assets

Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the net carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In connection with such review, the Company also reevaluates the periods of depreciation and amortization for these assets. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds their fair value.

Partner Distributions

Partner Distributions

Partner incentive allocations, which are determined by the general partner, can be formula-based or discretionary. Partner incentive allocations are treated as compensation expense and recognized in the period in which they are earned. In the event there is insufficient distributable cash flow to make incentive distributions, the general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may determine not to make any distributions called for under the partnership agreement. The remaining net income or loss after partner incentive allocations is generally allocated to unit holders based on their pro rata ownership.

Redeemable Partnership Units

Redeemable Partnership Units

If a principal of SLP is terminated for cause, SLP has the right to redeem all of the vested Class B units collectively held by the principal and his or her permitted transferees for a purchase price equal to the lesser of (i) the aggregate capital account balance in SLP of the principal and his or her permitted transferees or (ii) the purchase price paid by the terminated principal to first acquire the Class B units.

SLP also makes distributions to its partners of various nature including incentive payments, profit distributions and tax distributions.  The profit distributions and tax distributions are accounted for as equity transactions.

Class A Common Stock

The Company’s Class A stockholders are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. Also, Class A stockholders are entitled to receive dividends, when and if declared by the Company’s board of directors, out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any statutory or contractual restrictions on the payment of dividends and to any restrictions on the payment of dividends imposed by the terms of any outstanding preferred stock. Dividends consisting of shares of Class A common stock may be paid only as follows: (i) shares of Class A common stock may be paid only to holders of shares of Class A common stock and (ii) shares will be paid proportionately with respect to each outstanding share of the Company’s Class A common stock. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets, after payment in full of all amounts required to be paid to creditors and to holders of preferred stock having a liquidation preference, if any, the Class A stockholders will be entitled to share ratably in the Company’s remaining assets available for distribution to Class A stockholders. Class B units of SLP held by principals will be exchangeable for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary adjustments for share splits, dividends and reclassifications.

Class B Common Stock

Shares of the Company’s Class B common stock are issuable only in connection with the issuance of Class B units of SLP. When a vested or unvested Class B unit is issued by SLP, the Company will issue the holder one share of its Class B common stock in exchange for the payment of its par value. Each share of the Company’s Class B common stock will be redeemed for its par value and cancelled by the Company if the holder of the corresponding Class B unit exchanges or forfeits its Class B unit pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of SLP and the terms of the Silvercrest Asset Management Group Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Equity Incentive Plan”). The Company’s Class B stockholders will be entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders. The Company’s Class B stockholders will not participate in any dividends declared by the Company’s board of directors. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, or the sale of all, or substantially all, of its assets, Class B stockholders only will be entitled to receive the par value of the Company’s Class B common stock.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASC 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers.  The Company has evaluated the impact of ASC 606 on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  The impact of adopting ASC 606 is de minimis to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and recognition of revenue when compared to the prior year revenue recognition accounting guidance. The new revenue standard requires more comprehensive revenue recognition disclosure in the Company’s notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  

The Company generates revenue from management and advisory fees, performance fees and allocations, and family office services fees. Management and advisory fees and performance fees and allocations are generated by managing assets on behalf of separate accounts and acting as investment adviser for various investment funds. Performance fees and allocations also relate to assets managed in external investment strategies in which the Company has a revenue sharing arrangement and in funds in which the Company has no partnership interest. Management and advisory fees and family office services fees income is recognized through the course of the period in which these services are provided. Income from performance fees and allocations is recorded at the conclusion of the contractual performance period when all contingencies are resolved. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets.

The discretionary investment management agreements for the Company’s separately managed accounts do not have a specified term. Rather, each agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, unless otherwise agreed with the client, upon written notice of termination to the other party. The investment management agreements for the Company’s private funds are generally in effect from year to year, and may be terminated at the end of any year (or, in certain cases, on the anniversary of execution of the agreement) (i) by the Company upon 30 or 90 days’ prior written notice and (ii) after receiving the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the investors in the private fund that are not affiliated with the Company, by the private fund on 60 or 90 days’ prior written notice. The investment management agreements for the private funds may also generally be terminated effective immediately by either party where the non-terminating party (i) commits a material breach of the terms subject, in certain cases, to a cure period, (ii) is found to have committed fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct or (iii) terminates, becomes bankrupt, becomes insolvent or dissolves. Each of the Company’s investment management agreements contains customary indemnification obligations from the Company to their clients.

The management and advisory fees are primarily driven by the level of the Company’s assets under management. The assets under management increase or decrease based on the net inflows or outflows of funds into the Company’s various investment strategies and the investment performance of its clients’ accounts. In order to increase the Company’s assets under management and expand its business, the Company must develop and market investment strategies that suit the investment needs of its target clients and provide attractive returns over the long term. The Company’s ability to continue to attract clients will depend on a variety of factors including, among others:

• the ability to educate the Company’s target clients about the Company’s classic value investment strategies and provide them with exceptional client service;

• the relative investment performance of the Company’s investment strategies, as compared to competing products and market indices;

• competitive conditions in the investment management and broader financial services sectors;

• investor sentiment and confidence; and

• the decision to close strategies when the Company deems it to be in the best interests of its clients.

The majority of management and advisory fees that the Company earns on separately-managed accounts are based on the value of assets under management on the last day of each calendar quarter. Most of the management and advisory fees are billed quarterly in advance on the first day of each calendar quarter. The Company’s basic annual fee schedule for management of clients’ assets in separately managed accounts is generally: (i) for managed equity or balanced portfolios, 1% of the first $10 million and 0.60% on the balance, (ii) for managed fixed income only portfolios, 0.40% on the first $10 million and 0.30% on the balance and (iii) for the municipal value strategy, 0.65%. The Company’s fee for monitoring non-discretionary assets can range from 0.05% to 0.01%, but can also be incorporated into an agreed-upon fixed family office service fee. The majority of the Company’s clients pay a blended fee rate since they are invested in multiple strategies.

Management fees earned on investment funds that the Company advises are calculated primarily based on the net assets of the funds. Some funds calculate investment fees based on the net assets of the funds as of the last business day of each calendar quarter, whereas other funds calculate investment fees based on the value of net assets on the first business day of the month. Depending on the investment fund, fees are paid either quarterly in advance or quarterly in arrears. For the Company’s private fund clients, the fees range from 0.25% to 1.5% annually. Certain management fees earned on investment funds for which the Company performs risk management and due diligence services are based on flat fee agreements customized for each engagement.

The Company’s management and advisory fees may fluctuate based on a number of factors, including the following:

• changes in assets under management due to appreciation or depreciation of its investment portfolios, and the levels of the contribution and withdrawal of assets by new and existing clients;

• allocation of assets under management among its investment strategies, which have different fee schedules;

• allocation of assets under management between separately managed accounts and advised funds, for which the Company generally earns lower overall management and advisory fees; and

• the level of their performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees.

The Company’s performance fees and allocations may fluctuate based on performance with respect to accounts and funds on which the Company is paid incentive fees and allocations.

The Company’s family office services capabilities enable us to provide comprehensive and integrated services to its clients. The Company’s dedicated group of tax and financial planning professionals provide financial planning, tax planning and preparation, partnership accounting and fund administration and consolidated wealth reporting among other services. Family office services income fluctuates based on both the number of clients for whom the Company performs these services and the level of agreed-upon fees, most of which are flat fees. Therefore, non-discretionary assets under management, which are associated with family office services, do not typically serve as the basis for the amount of family office services revenue that is recognized. Family office services fees are also typically billed quarterly in advance at the beginning of the quarter or in arrears after the end of the quarter based on a contractual percentage of the assets managed or upon a contractually agreed-upon flat fee arrangement. Revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the period in which services are performed.

The Company accounts for performance-based revenue in accordance with ASC 606 by recognizing performance fees and allocations as revenue only when it is certain that the fee income is earned and payable pursuant to the relevant agreements. In certain arrangements, the Company is only entitled to receive performance fees and allocations when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. The Company records performance fees and allocations as a component of revenue once the performance fee or allocation, as applicable, has crystalized. As a result, there is no estimate or variability in the consideration when revenue is recorded.

Transition approach

The Company utilized the modified cumulative effect method as part its adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company recognized the modified cumulative effective of initially applying ASU 2014-09 as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application. As stated above, the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09 was immaterial.  This method was applied to either incomplete contracts the revenue of which had not been recognized in accordance with prior revenue guidance as of the date of initial application or all contracts as of, and new contracts after, the date of initial application. As of December 31, 2017, all revenue recognized was for complete contracts of revenue. As a result, there was no adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings of the annual reporting period that includes the date of adoption, which was January 1, 2018.

Equity-Based Compensation

Equity-Based Compensation

Equity-based compensation cost relating to the issuance of share-based awards to employees is based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant, which is expensed ratably over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions may affect the timing of the total amount of expense recognized over the vesting period. The service period is the period over which the employee performs the related services, which is normally the same as the vesting period. Equity-based awards that do not require future service are expensed immediately. Equity-based awards that have the potential to be settled in cash at the election of the employee or prior to the reorganization related to redeemable partnership units are classified as liabilities (“Liability Awards”) and are adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period.

Leases

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB established Topic 842, Leases, by issuing ASU No. 2016-02 (“ASC 842”), which requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842; ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases; and ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (“ROU”) that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the consolidated statement of operations.

The new standard became effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and the Company adopted this standard on this date. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) the effective date of the standard or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. The Company elected to use the effective date as its date of initial application. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods prior to January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients as part of transition accounting. The Company expects to elect the “package of practical expedients”, which allows the Company to avoid reassessing its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs under the new standard. The Company does not expect to elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements as these are not applicable to the Company.

This standard had a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The most significant changes relate to (1) the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for its office equipment and real estate operating leases and (2) providing significant new disclosures about the Company’s leasing activities.

Upon adoption, the Company recognized additional operating liabilities of approximately $44.0 million, with corresponding ROU and other assets based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under current leasing standards for existing operating leases.

The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting for leases. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for office equipment leases. For those current and prospective leases that qualify as short-term, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities. The Company also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

Silvercrest and SFS are subject to federal and state corporate income tax, which requires an asset and liability approach to the financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. SLP is not subject to federal and state income taxes, since all income, gains and losses are passed through to its partners. SLP is, however, subject to New York City unincorporated business tax. With respect to the Company’s incorporated entities, the annual tax rate is based on the income, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Tax laws are complex and subject to different interpretations by the taxpayer and respective governmental taxing authorities. Judgment is required in determining the tax expense and in evaluating tax positions. The tax effects of any uncertain tax position (“UTP”) taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns are recognized only if it is “more likely-than-not” to be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on its technical merits as of the reporting date. The tax benefits recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company recognizes estimated accrued interest and penalties related to UTPs in income tax expense.

The Company recognizes the benefit of a UTP in the period when it is effectively settled. Previously recognized tax positions are derecognized in the first period in which it is no longer more likely than not that the tax position would be sustained upon examination.

Recent Accounting Developments

Recent Accounting Developments

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments—Overall (Topic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." Although the ASU retains many current requirements, it significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.  Some of the amendments in ASU 2016-01 include the following: (1) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (3) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; and (4) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value, among others. ASU 2016-01 became effective on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Accounting for Credit Losses” which amends the Board’s guidance on the impairment of financial instruments. The ASU adds to U.S. GAAP an impairment model (known as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model) that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. This amendment is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Cash Flow Classification” which amends the guidance in ASC 230 on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Restricted Cash” which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during a reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The amendment was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, The FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 85): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”.  The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.  ASU 2017-01 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2019 and interim reporting periods within that year.  Early adoption is permitted for transactions that have not been reported in financial statements that have been issued or made available for issuance.  The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2017, The FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”.  ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment testing.  An entity will no longer determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination.  Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value.  The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.  An entity has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.  ASU 2017-04 will be effective for the Company in fiscal year 2021 and interim reporting periods within that year.  Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.  The Company expects the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”.  The ASU conforms the derecognition guidance on nonfinancial assets with the model for transactions in the new revenue standard (ASC 606, as amended).  Subtopic 610-20 was issued as part of the new revenue standard. It provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers. The new guidance defines “in substance nonfinancial assets,” unifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets, eliminates rules specifically addressing sales of real estate, removes exceptions to the financial asset derecognition model, and clarifies the accounting for contributions of nonfinancial assets to joint ventures. This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 “Compensation – Stock”.  The ASU amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements.  The ASU provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718.  Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification.  This ASU was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract.” The ASU provides guidance for entities to evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement which includes a software license. ASU 2018-15 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company expects the adoption of this guidance will not have a material effect on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2018, the SEC issued Final Rule Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification. The rule amends certain disclosure requirements that have become redundant, overlapping, outdated or superseded. The rule became effective for the Company’s current quarterly report, with the ability to adopt the changes in the current period, or defer until 2019.  The Company elected to defer the changes to the interim period disclosure rules related to changes to shareholders’ equity until its first quarter report in 2019.

XML

Investments and Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Category of Financial Instruments Not Held at Fair Value

At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, financial instruments that are not held at fair value are categorized in the table below:

	March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Fair Value Hierarchy
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,494	$	45,494	$	69,283	$	69,283		Level I	(1)
Investments	$	1,493	$	1,493	$	1,493	$	1,493		N/A	(2)

(1) Includes $17,307 and $17,200 of cash equivalents at March 31,2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, that fall under Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

(2) Investments consist of the Company’s equity method investments in affiliated investment funds which have been established and managed by the Company and its affiliates.  Fair value of investments is based on the net asset value of the affiliated investment funds which is a practical expedient for fair value, which is not included in the fair value hierarchy under GAAP.

(3) The carrying value of notes payable and borrowings under the revolving credit agreement approximates fair value, which is determined based on interest rates currently available to the Company for similar debt.

XML

Receivables, Net (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Receivables [Abstract]

Summary of Receivables

The following is a summary of receivables as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Management and advisory fees receivable	$	3,843		$	3,358
Unbilled receivables		3,128			3,036
Other receivables		2			2,249
Receivables		6,973			8,643
Allowance for doubtful receivables		(621	)		(621	)
Receivables, net	$	6,352		$	8,022

XML

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]

Summary of Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net

The following is a summary of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Leasehold improvements	$	5,285		$	5,229
Furniture and equipment		5,458			6,022
Artwork		485			483
Total cost		11,228			11,734
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(7,966	)		(8,298	)
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	3,262		$	3,436

XML

Goodwill (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Goodwill [Abstract]

Summary of Changes to Carrying Amount of Goodwill

The following is a summary of the changes to the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Beginning
Gross balance	$	42,583		$	42,583
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance		25,168			25,168
Acquisition of Neosho		2,184			─
Ending
Gross balance		44,767			42,583
Accumulated impairment losses		(17,415	)		(17,415	)
Net balance	$	27,352		$	25,168

XML

Intangible Assets, Net (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Intangible Assets Net Excluding Goodwill [Abstract]

Summary of Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of intangible assets as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	Customer Relationships			Other Intangible Assets			Total
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Balance, March 31, 2019		22,560			2,467			25,027
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2019		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Amortization expense		(308	)		(40	)		(348	)
Balance, March 31, 2019		(13,195	)		(2,287	)		(15,482	)
Net book value	$	9,365		$	180		$	9,545
Cost
Balance, January 1, 2018	$	22,560		$	2,467		$	25,027
Balance, December 31, 2018		22,560			2,467			25,027
Useful lives		10-20 years			3-5 years
Accumulated amortization
Balance, January 1, 2018		(11,367	)		(2,082	)		(13,449	)
Amortization expense		(1,520	)		(165	)		(1,685	)
Balance, December 31, 2018		(12,887	)		(2,247	)		(15,134	)
Net Book Value	$	9,673		$	220		$	9,893

Schedule of Future Amortization Related to Intangible Assets

Amortization related to the Company’s finite life intangible assets is scheduled to be expensed over the next five years and thereafter as follows:

2019 (remainder of)	$	1,042
2020		1,299
2021		1,196
2022		1,142
2023		983
Thereafter		3,883
Total	$	9,545

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Summary of Future Minimum Lease Payments and Rentals under Lease Agreements

Future minimum lease payments and rentals under lease agreements which expire through 2028 are as follows:

	Minimum Lease Commitments		Non-cancellable Subleases			Minimum Net Rentals
Remainder of 2019	$	4,657	$	(55	)	$	4,602
2020		6,183		(34	)		6,149
2021		6,193		(35	)		6,158
2022		6,076		(35	)		6,041
2023		5,770		(6	)		5,764
Thereafter		27,827		—			27,827
Total	$	56,706	$	(165	)	$	56,541
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (months)							111.1
Weighted-average discount rate							4.3	%

Assets Relating to Finance Leases Included in Equipment

The assets relating to finance leases that are included in equipment as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Finance lease assets included in furniture and equipment	$	588		$	605
Finance lease assets included in software		—			58
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(408	)		(462	)
	$	180		$	201

Summary of Future Minimum Lease Payments under Finance Leases

Future minimum lease payments under finance leases are as follows:

	Future Minimum Lease Commitments
Remainder of 2019	$	67
2020		75
2021		37
2022		3
2023		—
Total	$	182
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases (months)		27.1
Weighted-average discount rate		4.0	%

XML

Equity (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Equity [Abstract]

Summary of Authorized and Outstanding Equity

Silvercrest has the following authorized and outstanding equity:

	Shares at March 31, 2019
	Authorized		Outstanding		Voting Rights	Economic Rights
Common shares
Class A, par value $0.01 per share		50,000,000		8,535,170	1 vote per share (1), (2)	All (1), (2)
Class B, par value $0.01 per share		25,000,000		4,918,545	1 vote per share (3), (4)	None (3), (4)
Preferred shares
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share		10,000,000		—	See footnote (5) below	See footnote (5) below

(1) Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share. Class A common stockholders have 100% of the rights of all classes of Silvercrest’s capital stock to receive dividends.

(2) During 2016, Silvercrest granted 10,582 restricted stock units which will vest and settle in the form of Class A shares of Silvercrest, of which 3,791 remain unvested as of March 31, 2019.

(3) Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to one vote per share.

(4) Each Class B unit of SLP held by a principal is exchangeable for one share of the Company’s Class A common stock. The principals collectively hold 4,918,545 Class B units, which represent the right to receive their proportionate share of the distributions made by SLP, and 243,523 restricted stock units which will vest and settle in the form of Class B units of SLP.  The 243,523 restricted stock units which have been issued to our principals entitle the holders thereof to participate in distributions from SLP as if the underlying Class B units are outstanding and thus are taken into account to determine the economic interest of each holder of units in SLP. However, because the Class B units underlying the restricted stock units have not been issued and are not deemed outstanding, the holders of restricted stock units have no voting rights with respect to those Class B units. Silvercrest will not issue shares of Class B common stock in respect of restricted stock units of SLP until such time that the underlying Class B units are issued.

(5) Silvercrest’s board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock in one or more classes or series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and related restrictions, including dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the number of shares constituting any class or series, or the designation of the class or series, without the approval of its stockholders.

Schedule of Common Stock Outstanding

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, Silvercrest issued the following shares:

Class A Common Stock

	Transaction	# of
	Date	Shares
Class A common stock outstanding - January 1, 2019			8,518,096
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March 2019		17,074
Class A common shares outstanding – March 31, 2019			8,535,170

Class B Common Stock

	Transaction	# of
	Date	Shares
Class B common stock outstanding - January 1, 2019			4,934,103
Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Neosho Acquisition	January 2019		1,516
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	March 2019		(17,074	)
Class B common shares outstanding – March 31, 2019			4,918,545

XML

Notes Receivable from Partners (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Accounts Notes And Loans Receivable [Line Items]

Summary of Receivables

The following is a summary of receivables as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Management and advisory fees receivable	$	3,843		$	3,358
Unbilled receivables		3,128			3,036
Other receivables		2			2,249
Receivables		6,973			8,643
Allowance for doubtful receivables		(621	)		(621	)
Receivables, net	$	6,352		$	8,022

Partners

Accounts Notes And Loans Receivable [Line Items]

Summary of Receivables

Notes receivable from partners are as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018:

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Beginning balance	$	924		$	1,918
New note receivable issued to partners					100
Repayment of notes		(291	)		(1,119	)
Interest accrued and capitalized on notes receivable		3			25
Ending balance	$	636		$	924

XML

Equity-Based Compensation (Tables)

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2019

Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]

Summary of RSU Grants

A summary of the RSU grants by the Company as of March 31, 2019 and 2018 is presented below:

	Restricted Stock Units Granted
	Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		247,316	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at March 31, 2019		247,316	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at January 1, 2018		491,786	$	13.19 – 13.23
Total granted at March 31, 2018		491,786	$	13.19 – 13.23

Non-Qualified Stock Options

Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]

Summary of NQO Grants

A summary of the NQO grants by the Company as of March 31, 2019 is presented below:

	Non-Qualified Options Granted
	Units		Fair Value per unit
Total granted at January 1, 2019		105,398	$	13.97
Total granted at March 31, 2019		105,398	$	13.97

XML

Organization and Business - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended
	Jun. 26, 2013	Mar. 31, 2019	Apr. 01, 2012	Oct. 03, 2008	Dec. 31, 2004	Mar. 11, 2004
Business And Organization [Line Items]
Tax receivable agreement with limited partner, percentage of cash savings to be paid		85.00%
Recognition of tax receivable agreement liability		$ 9,063
Percentage of cash savings expected to be realized		15.00%
Silvercrest Financial Services Inc
Business And Organization [Line Items]
Percentage of outstanding shares acquired						100.00%
Sam Alternative Solutions Inc
Business And Organization [Line Items]
Percentage of outstanding shares acquired					100.00%
Marathon Capital Group, LLC
Business And Organization [Line Items]
Percentage of outstanding shares acquired				100.00%
MW Commodity Advisors, LLC
Business And Organization [Line Items]
Percentage of outstanding shares acquired			100.00%
Silvercrest L.P | Class A Common Stock
Business And Organization [Line Items]
Number of shares held by parent	8,535,170
Percentage ownership in a consolidated subsidiary	63.30%	63.30%

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Additional Information (Detail)	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($) Segment Unit	Mar. 31, 2018 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018 Unit	Jan. 01, 2019 USD ($)	Jun. 26, 2013
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Number of operating segment | Segment	1
Cash equivalents, maximum maturity period	90 days
Equity method investments, unrealized intercompany profit (loss) not eliminated amount	$ 0
Number of reporting unit | Unit	1		1
Impairment charges on goodwill	$ 0	$ 0
Operating lease liabilities	42,785,000
Operating lease, ROU assets	$ 36,150,000
Accounting Standards Update 2016-02
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Operating lease liabilities				$ 44,000,000
Operating lease, ROU assets				$ 44,000,000
Equity or Balanced Portfolios
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Percentage of asset management fee on threshold limit	1.00%
Asset under management, threshold limit	$ 10,000,000
Percentage of asset management fee on balance	0.60%
Fixed Income Portfolios
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Percentage of asset management fee on threshold limit	0.40%
Asset under management, threshold limit	$ 10,000,000
Percentage of asset management fee on balance	0.30%
Municipal Value Strategy
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Percentage of income from asset management fee	0.65%
Minimum
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets, useful life	3 years
Minimum | Private Funds
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Prior written notice period to terminate investment management agreements	30 days
Prior written notice period after receiving the affirmative vote, to terminate investment management agreements	60 days
Percentage of income from asset management fee	0.25%
Minimum | Non-discretionary Assets
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Percentage of income from asset management fee	0.05%
Maximum
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets, useful life	20 years
Maximum | Private Funds
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Prior written notice period to terminate investment management agreements	90 days
Prior written notice period after receiving the affirmative vote, to terminate investment management agreements	90 days
Percentage of income from asset management fee	1.50%
Maximum | Non-discretionary Assets
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Percentage of income from asset management fee	0.01%
Leasehold Improvements
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, useful life	10 years
Other Fixed Assets | Minimum
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, useful life	3 years
Other Fixed Assets | Maximum
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, useful life	7 years
Equity Method Investments
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Impairment charges related to equity method investments	$ 0	$ 0
Class A Common Stock
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Common stock, voting rights	1 vote per share
Class B Common Stock
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Common stock, voting rights	1 vote per share
Class of share exchangeable to another class	One share of Class A common stock
Silvercrest L.P | Class A Common Stock
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Ownership percentage in a subsidiary	63.30%				63.30%
Common stock, voting rights	1 vote per share

XML

Acquisitions - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands				3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 13, 2018	Dec. 15, 2015	Mar. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Neosho
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cash paid on date of acquisition	$ 399			$ 399
Equity consideration for SLP acquired	20			1,686
Contingent consideration	1,686
Expected payments on first anniversary of closing date	300
Earn out payments due in two years	100,000
Earn out payments due in three years	100,000
Earn out payments due in four years	100,000
Earn out payments due in five years	$ 100,000
Percentage of product to obtain earn out payment	50.00%
Percentage of earn out payment paid in cash	75.00%
Percentage of earn out payment paid in equity	25.00%
Cappiccille
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Equity consideration for SLP acquired				126	$ 231
Contingent consideration		$ 354
Cash paid on date of acquisition		$ 148
Earn out payments percentage on revenue remainder of fiscal year		19.00%
Earn out payments percentage on revenue due in two years		19.00%
Earn out payments percentage on revenue due in three years		19.00%
Earn out payments percentage on revenue due in four years		19.00%
Earn out payments percentage on revenue due thereafter		19.00%
Jamison
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Equity consideration for SLP acquired			$ 3,562
Contingent consideration			1,429	$ 204	$ 524
Cash paid on date of acquisition			$ 3,550
Earn out payments percentage on EBITDA remainder of fiscal year			20.00%
Earn out payments percentage on EBITDA due in two years			20.00%
Earn out payments percentage on EBITDA due in three years			20.00%
Earn out payments percentage on EBITDA due in four years			20.00%
Earn out payments percentage on EBITDA due in five years			20.00%
Earn Out Payments Percentage On EBITDA Due thereafter			20.00%
Jamison | Seller Note
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Promissory note issued			$ 394
Interest on principal amount			5.00%
Jamison | Principals Notes
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Promissory note issued			$ 1,771
Interest on principal amount			5.00%

XML

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Investments	$ 1,493,000	$ 1,493,000
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial assets	0	0
Financial liabilities	$ 0	$ 0
Maximum
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Maximum financial interest in affiliated investment funds	2.00%

XML

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Category of Financial Instruments Not Held at Fair Value (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Carrying Amount
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial Assets, Investments	$ 1,493	$ 1,493
Carrying Amount | Level I
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial Assets, Cash and cash equivalents	45,494	69,283
Fair Value
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial Assets, Investments	1,493	1,493
Fair Value | Level I
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Financial Assets, Cash and cash equivalents	$ 45,494	$ 69,283

XML

Investments and Fair Value Measurements - Category of Financial Instruments Not Held at Fair Value (Parenthetical) (Detail) - Level I - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Carrying Amount
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Cash equivalents	$ 17,307	$ 17,200
Fair Value
Fair Value Balance Sheet Grouping Financial Statement Captions [Line Items]
Cash equivalents	$ 17,307	$ 17,200

XML

Receivables, Net - Summary of Receivables (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Receivables [Abstract]
Management and advisory fees receivable	$ 3,843	$ 3,358
Unbilled receivables	3,128	3,036
Other receivables	2	2,249
Receivables	6,973	8,643
Allowance for doubtful receivables	(621)	(621)
Receivables, net	$ 6,352	$ 8,022

XML

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net - Summary of Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Property Plant And Equipment Useful Life And Values [Abstract]
Total cost	$ 11,228	$ 11,734
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(7,966)	(8,298)
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net	3,262	3,436
Leasehold Improvements
Property Plant And Equipment Useful Life And Values [Abstract]
Total cost	5,285	5,229
Furniture and Equipment
Property Plant And Equipment Useful Life And Values [Abstract]
Total cost	5,458	6,022
Artwork
Property Plant And Equipment Useful Life And Values [Abstract]
Total cost	$ 485	$ 483

XML

Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018
Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]
Depreciation expense	$ 163	$ 188
Leased assets write off	$ 310

XML

Goodwill - Summary of Changes to Carrying Amount of Goodwill (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Goodwill [Line Items]
Beginning, Gross balance	$ 42,583	$ 42,583
Beginning, Accumulated impairment losses	(17,415)	(17,415)
Beginning, Net balance	25,168	25,168
Ending, Gross balance	44,767	42,583
Ending, Accumulated impairment losses	(17,415)	(17,415)
Ending, Net balance	27,352	25,168
Neosho
Goodwill [Line Items]
Goodwill, Acquisition	$ 2,184	$ 0

XML

Intangible Assets, Net - Summary of Intangible Assets (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Cost of intangible assets gross	$ 25,027		$ 25,027	$ 25,027
Accumulated amortization, beginning balance	(15,134)	$ (13,449)	(13,449)
Amortization expense	(348)	(425)	(1,685)
Accumulated amortization, ending balance	(15,482)		(15,134)
Net book value	$ 9,545		9,893
Minimum
Useful lives	3 years
Maximum
Useful lives	20 years
Customer Relationships
Cost of intangible assets gross	$ 22,560		22,560	22,560
Accumulated amortization, beginning balance	(12,887)	(11,367)	(11,367)
Amortization expense	(308)		(1,520)
Accumulated amortization, ending balance	(13,195)		(12,887)
Net book value	$ 9,365		$ 9,673
Customer Relationships | Minimum
Useful lives	10 years		10 years
Customer Relationships | Maximum
Useful lives	20 years		20 years
Other Intangible Assets
Cost of intangible assets gross	$ 2,467		$ 2,467	$ 2,467
Accumulated amortization, beginning balance	(2,247)	$ (2,082)	(2,082)
Amortization expense	(40)		(165)
Accumulated amortization, ending balance	(2,287)		(2,247)
Net book value	$ 180		$ 220
Other Intangible Assets | Minimum
Useful lives	3 years		3 years
Other Intangible Assets | Maximum
Useful lives	5 years		5 years

XML

Intangible Assets, Net - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018
Intangible Assets Net Excluding Goodwill [Abstract]
Amortization expenses of intangible assets	$ 348	$ 425	$ 1,685

XML

Intangible Assets, Net - Schedule of Future Amortization Related to Intangible Assets (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net, Amortization Expense, Fiscal Year Maturity [Abstract]
2019 (remainder of)	$ 1,042
2020	1,299
2021	1,196
2022	1,142
2023	983
Thereafter	3,883
Net book value	$ 9,545	$ 9,893

XML

Debt - Additional Information (Detail)			3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jun. 22, 2018	Jun. 24, 2013 USD ($) Installment	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2018 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2018 USD ($)
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Interest expense including amortization of deferred financing fees			$ 8,000	$ 16,000
City National Bank
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Credit facility, borrowing capacity		$ 15,000,000
Credit facility maturity date	Jun. 24, 2025
Credit facility, proceeds from borrowings			0		$ 0
Credit facility draw date	Jun. 25, 2023
Borrowings under revolving credit facility			0		$ 0
Interest expense including amortization of deferred financing fees			$ 7,000	$ 4,000
Delayed Draw Term Loan | City National Bank
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Credit facility, borrowing capacity		$ 7,500,000
Credit facility maturity date			Jun. 24, 2025
Credit facility, interest rate description			The higher of the prime rate plus a margin of 0.05 percentage points and 2.5% or (b) the LIBOR rate plus 3 percentage points, at the borrowers’ option.
Variable rate notes issued for redemption of partners' interests, spread		3.00%
Debt instrument variable interest rate basis			LIBOR
Credit facility, number of installments | Installment		20
Credit facility, frequency of installments			Quarterly
Delayed Draw Term Loan | City National Bank | Maximum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Variable rate notes issued for redemption of partners' interests, spread		0.05%
Debt instrument variable interest rate basis			Prime rate
Delayed Draw Term Loan | City National Bank | Minimum
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Credit facility, fixed interest rate		2.50%
Borrowings Under Revolving Credit Agreement | City National Bank
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Credit facility, borrowing capacity		$ 7,500,000
Credit facility maturity date			Dec. 21, 2018
Credit facility extended maturity date			Jun. 21, 2019
Debt covenant, restriction on change in control		30.00%

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($)			1 Months Ended											3 Months Ended
	Dec. 13, 2018	Jan. 16, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Jan. 31, 2018	Jul. 31, 2017	Jan. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2016	Jan. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Oct. 31, 2015	Jul. 31, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense														$ 1,529,000	$ 1,511,000
Sub-lease income														32,000	75,000
Assets acquired under finance leases														180,000
Finance lease obligation														183,000
Depreciation expense														31,000	$ 21,000
Additional Office Space
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net							$ 10,000						$ 5,000
Refundable security deposit													$ 3,000
Lease commencement date							Oct. 01, 2017						May 01, 2014
Lease expires							Nov. 30, 2024						Jul. 31, 2019
Number of rent free periods													3 months
Rent credit							$ 40,000
Additional Office Space | Amendment Number Two
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Lease commencement date		Jan. 16, 2018
Lease expires		Nov. 30, 2028
Lease expansion date		Jan. 12, 2018
Office Space | Charlottesville, VA.
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net												$ 2,000
Refundable security deposit												$ 2,000
Lease commencement date												Jun. 30, 2015
Lease expires												Jun. 30, 2018
Office Space | Bedminster, NJ.
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net														$ 11,000
Lease expires														Mar. 31, 2022
Number of rent free periods														4 months
Office Space | Princeton, NJ.
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net								$ 6,000						$ 5,000
Lease expires								Aug. 31, 2022						Apr. 30, 2016
Number of rent free periods								5 months
Office Space | New York City
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net									$ 446,000
Lease commencement date									Oct. 01, 2017
Lease expires									Sep. 30, 2028
Number of rent free periods									12 months
Payments for tenant improvements									$ 2,080,000
Office Space | Livingston, NJ
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net								$ 2,000
Office Space | Boston, MA
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net				$ 33,000
Lease commencement date				Jan. 01, 2018
Lease expires				Apr. 30, 2023
Number of rent free periods				1 month
Office Space | La Jolla, CA
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net	$ 3,000
Lease expires	Jan. 31, 2020
Office Space | Extended Lease Agreement | Charlottesville, VA.
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Lease commencement date												Jul. 01, 2018
Lease expires												Jun. 30, 2019
Lease extended period												1 year
Office Equipment
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Finance lease obligation														$ 182,000		$ 188,000
Office Equipment | Telephone System
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Lease expires														Nov. 30, 2018
Assets acquired under finance leases														$ 321,000
Finance lease, period														5 years
Finance lease, minimum monthly payment														$ 5,000
Office Equipment | Copier
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Lease expires			Feb. 28, 2021			Dec. 31, 2018				Oct. 31, 2018	Jun. 30, 2018
Assets acquired under finance leases						$ 11,000				$ 18,000	$ 21,000			11,000
Finance lease, period			3 years			2 years				3 years	3 years				3 years
Finance lease, minimum monthly payment			$ 300			$ 1,000				$ 1,000	$ 1,000
Office Equipment | Two Copiers
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Lease expires						Jan. 31, 2022
Assets acquired under finance leases						$ 152,000
Finance lease, period						5 years
Finance lease, minimum monthly payment						$ 3,000
Office Equipment | Four Copiers
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Lease expires					Jun. 30, 2020
Assets acquired under finance leases					$ 72,000
Finance lease, period					3 years
Finance lease, minimum monthly payment					$ 2,000
Office Equipment | Jamison
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Assets acquired under finance leases												$ 253,000
Letter of Credit
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Refundable security deposit														506,000		$ 506,000
Letter of Credit | Boston landlord
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Refundable security deposit														80,000
General and administrative
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Operating lease rent expense, net														$ 1,497,000	$ 1,436,000

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Summary of Future Minimum Lease Payments and Rentals under Lease Agreements (Detail) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($)
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Minimum Lease Commitments, Remainder of 2019	$ 4,657
Minimum Lease Commitments, 2020	6,183
Minimum Lease Commitments, 2021	6,193
Minimum Lease Commitments, 2022	6,076
Minimum Lease Commitments, 2023	5,770
Minimum Lease Commitments, Thereafter	27,827
Minimum Lease Commitments, Total	$ 56,706
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (months)	111 months 3 days
Non-cancellable Subleases, Remainder of 2019	$ (55)
Non-cancellable Subleases, 2020	(34)
Non-cancellable Subleases, 2021	(35)
Non-cancellable Subleases, 2022	(35)
Non-cancellable Subleases, 2023	(6)
Non-cancellable Subleases, Total	(165)
Minimum Net Rentals, Remainder of 2019	4,602
Minimum Net Rentals, 2020	6,149
Minimum Net Rentals, 2021	6,158
Minimum Net Rentals, 2022	6,041
Minimum Net Rentals, 2023	5,764
Minimum Net Rentals, Thereafter	27,827
Minimum Net Rentals, Total	$ 56,541
Weighted-average discount rate	4.30%

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Assets Relating to Finance Leases Included in Equipment (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Finance lease assets, gross	$ 180
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(408)	$ (462)
Finance leases, net	180	201
Furniture and Equipment
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Finance lease assets, gross	$ 588	605
Software
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items]
Finance lease assets, gross		$ 58

XML

Commitments and Contingencies - Summary of Future Minimum Lease Payments under Finance Leases (Detail) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2019 USD ($)
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Remainder of 2019	$ 67
2020	75
2021	37
2022	3
Total	$ 182
Weighted-average remaining lease term – finance leases (months)	27 months 3 days
Weighted-average discount rate	4.00%

XML

Equity - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Jan. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Partnership distributions, amount			$ 2,285	$ 2,072
Distributions of partner incentive allocations of net income			$ 27,199	$ 24,935
Class B Common Stock
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Share conversion, Shares			(17,000)	(117,000)
Class B Common Stock | Resale And Registration Rights Agreement
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Share conversion, Shares	17,074
Class B Common Stock | Neosho
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Neosho Acquisition		1,516
Silvercrest L.P
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Accrued partner incentive allocations			$ 5,178	$ 6,763

XML

Equity - Summary of Authorized and Outstanding Equity (Detail) - shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Preferred shares
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	0	0
Class A Common Stock
Common shares
Common stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	8,535,170	8,518,096	8,259,000	8,142,000
Common stock, voting rights	1 vote per share
Class B Common Stock
Common shares
Common stock, shares authorized	25,000,000	25,000,000
Common stock, shares outstanding	4,918,545	4,934,103	4,942,000	5,059,000
Common stock, voting rights	1 vote per share

XML

Equity - Summary of Authorized and Outstanding Equity (Parenthetical) (Detail) - $ / shares	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Preferred stock, par value	$ 0.01		$ 0.01
Class A Common Stock
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01		$ 0.01
Common stock, voting rights	1 vote per share
Common stockholders rights percentage	100.00%
Restricted stock units granted		10,582
Restricted stock units unvested	3,791
Common stock, shares outstanding	8,535,170		8,518,096	8,259,000	8,142,000
Class B Common Stock
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Common stock, par value	$ 0.01		$ 0.01
Common stock, voting rights	1 vote per share
Restricted stock units granted	243,523
Class of share exchangeable to another class	One share of Class A common stock
Common stock, shares outstanding	4,918,545		4,934,103	4,942,000	5,059,000

XML

Equity - Class A Common Stock (Detail) - Class A Common Stock - shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Common stock, shares outstanding	8,535,170	8,518,096	8,259,000	8,142,000
Issuance of Class A common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	17,074
Common stock conversion date	Mar. 31, 2019

XML

Equity - Class B Common Stock (Detail) - Class B Common Stock - shares	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Jan. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Common stock conversion date			2019-03
Common stock, shares outstanding	4,918,545		4,918,545	4,942,000	4,934,103	5,059,000
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock			17,000	117,000
Resale And Registration Rights Agreement
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Cancellation of Class B common stock upon conversion of Class B units to Class A common stock	(17,074)
Neosho
Class Of Stock [Line Items]
Common stock issuance date		2019-01
Issuance of Class B common stock in connection with the Neosho Acquisition		1,516

XML

Notes Receivable from Partners - Additional Information (Detail) - Partners - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Aug. 31, 2009	Jan. 31, 2008
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Term of promissory notes receivable	in the form of five or six year interest-bearing promissory notes and/or in the form of nine year interest-bearing limited recourse promissory notes
Notes receivable from partners	$ 636,000	$ 924,000	$ 1,918,000
Allowance for credit losses on notes receivable	0	0
Limited Recourse
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Interest rates of promissory notes				2.77%	3.53%
Notes receivable from partners	0	0
Full Recourse
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Notes receivable from partners	$ 636,000	$ 924,000

XML

Notes Receivable from Partners - Schedule of Notes Receivable from Partners (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018
Accounts Notes And Loans Receivable [Line Items]
Interest accrued and capitalized on notes receivable	$ 3	$ 8
Partners
Accounts Notes And Loans Receivable [Line Items]
Beginning balance	924	$ 1,918	$ 1,918
New note receivable issued to partners			100
Repayment of notes	(291)		(1,119)
Interest accrued and capitalized on notes receivable	3		25
Ending balance	$ 636		$ 924

XML

Related Party Transactions - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Total revenue	$ 22,572	$ 24,331
Due from Silvercrest Funds	1,417		$ 1,233
Management and Advisory Fees
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Total revenue	21,589	23,303
Affiliated Entity
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due from Silvercrest Funds	1,417		1,233
Receivable from partners	3		$ 3
Affiliated Entity | Management Fees
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Total revenue	1,263	1,589
Affiliated Entity | Management and Advisory Fees
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Total revenue	$ 291	$ 298
Affiliated Entity | Minimum
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management and advisory fees percentage	0.00%
Percentage of performance fees	0.00%
Affiliated Entity | Maximum
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Management and advisory fees percentage	1.75%
Percentage of performance fees	10.00%

XML

Income Taxes - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018
Income Taxes Disclosure [Line Items]
Net deferred tax assets	$ 11,753		$ 12,093
Net deferred tax asset	11,846		12,206
Net deferred tax liabilities relating to non-controlling interests	35
Current tax expense	614	$ 1,161
Corporate tax expense	182
Deferred tax expense	409	130
Provision for income taxes	$ 1,023	1,291
Income tax settlement	The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
Non-controlling Interest
Income Taxes Disclosure [Line Items]
Current tax expense	$ 163	228
Deferred tax expense	(7)	(16)
Provision for income taxes	156	$ 212
Silvercrest L.P
Income Taxes Disclosure [Line Items]
Deferred tax asset	5
Net deferred tax liability			20
Corporate tax expense	431
Silvercrest Financial Services Inc
Income Taxes Disclosure [Line Items]
Net deferred tax liability	88		$ 93
Corporate tax expense	$ 1

XML

Equity-Based Compensation - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Oct. 31, 2018	May 31, 2016	Aug. 31, 2015	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2018	Nov. 02, 2012
Non-Qualified Stock Options
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock units granted	105,398
Restricted stock units\non-qualified stock options, granted description	One third of the NQOs will vest and become exercisable on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date.
Fair value assumptions, strike price	$ 13.97
Fair value assumptions, risk free rate	2.94%
Fair value assumptions, expiration	5 years
Fair value assumptions, volatility	32.70%
Compensation expense forfeiture rate	1.00%
Compensation expense				$ 842	$ 800
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards				$ 1,550		$ 2,392
Recognition period of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards				1 year 3 months 3 days		1 year 6 months 3 days
Restricted Stock Units
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Compensation expense				$ 842	$ 800
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards				$ 1,550		$ 2,392
Recognition period of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards				1 year 3 months 3 days		1 year 6 months 3 days
2012 Equity Incentive Plan
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Shares reserved for issuance				584,679
Shares reserved for issuance, authorized							1,687,500
Restricted stock units granted		3,791	966,510
Fair Value per unit		$ 13.19	$ 13.23
Restricted stock units\non-qualified stock options, granted description				Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Employee
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock units granted		7,582
Fair Value per unit		$ 13.19
Restricted stock units\non-qualified stock options, granted description				Twenty-five percent of the RSUs granted vest and settle on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Board of Directors
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock units granted		3,000
Fair Value per unit		$ 13.19
Restricted stock units\non-qualified stock options, granted description				One hundred percent of the RSUs granted vested and settled on the first anniversary of the grant date.
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | First Anniversary
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%	25.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | First Anniversary | Employee
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | First Anniversary | Board of Directors
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		100.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Second Anniversary
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%	25.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Second Anniversary | Employee
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Third Anniversary
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%	25.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Third Anniversary | Employee
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Fourth Anniversary
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%	25.00%
2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Fourth Anniversary | Employee
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Restricted stock, vesting percentage		25.00%

XML

Equity-Based Compensation - Summary of RSU Grants (Detail) - Restricted Stock Units - $ / shares	Mar. 31, 2019	Dec. 31, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Beginning Balance, Units	247,316	491,786	491,786
Ending Balance, Units	247,316	247,316	491,786
Minimum
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair Value per unit	$ 13.19	$ 13.19	$ 13.19
Fair Value per unit	13.19	13.19	13.19
Maximum
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Fair Value per unit	13.23	13.23	13.23
Fair Value per unit	$ 13.23	$ 13.23	$ 13.23

XML

Equity-Based Compensation - Summary of NQO Grants (Detail) - Non-Qualified Options	Mar. 31, 2019 $ / shares shares
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Beginning Balance, Units | shares	105,398
Ending Balance, Units | shares	105,398
Fair Value per unit | $ / shares	$ 13.97
Fair Value per unit | $ / shares	$ 13.97

XML

Defined Contribution and Deferred Compensation Plans - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Silvercrest matching contributions towards benefit of employees	$ 22	$ 19
Defined contribution plan, plan name	401(k) savings plan
Maximum
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Silvercrest matching contribution percentage	4.00%

XML

Soft Dollar Arrangements - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2019	Mar. 31, 2018
Soft Dollar Arrangements [Abstract]
Soft dollar credits	$ 193	$ 193

XML

Subsequent Events - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($)			1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended
	May 01, 2019	Apr. 12, 2019	Oct. 31, 2018	May 31, 2016	Aug. 31, 2015	Mar. 31, 2019
Class B Unit Holder
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Number of shares granted						243,523
Non-Qualified Stock Options
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Number of shares granted			105,398
2012 Equity Incentive Plan
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Number of shares granted				3,791	966,510
Subsequent Event | Silvercrest L.P | 2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Restricted Stock Units | Class B Unit Holder
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Number of shares granted	34,338
Subsequent Event | Silvercrest L.P | 2012 Equity Incentive Plan | Non-Qualified Stock Options | Class B Unit Holder
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Number of shares granted	60,742
Purchase Agreement | Subsequent Event | Cortina Asset Management, LLC
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Percentage to acquire business in cash		80.00%
Purchase agreement closing period		120 days
Additional percentage to acquire business in cash		80.00%
Purchase Agreement | Subsequent Event | Cortina Asset Management, LLC | Maximum
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Aggregate purchase amount		$ 44,937,000
Addtional aggregate purchase amount		$ 26,209,000
Purchase Agreement | Subsequent Event | Cortina Asset Management, LLC | Silvercrest L.P
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Percentage of business combination consideration issuance		20.00%
Additional percentage of earn out payment paid in cash		20.00%
Potential earn-out payments period		4 years