XML 22 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Debt
6 Months Ended
Jun. 28, 2016
Long-term Debt, Unclassified [Abstract]  
Debt
Debt
The Company’s debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 28,
2016
 
December 29,
2015
Term Loan
$
396,936

 
$
401,263

Unamortized debt issuance costs
(6,317
)
 
(7,581
)
Term Loan notes less unamortized debt issuance costs
390,619

 
393,682

 
 
 
 
Senior Notes
190,000

 
190,000

Unamortized debt issuance costs
(2,205
)
 
(2,513
)
Senior Notes less unamortized debt issuance costs
187,795

 
187,487

Revolving Facility ($110 million) (1)
—

 
—

 
578,414

 
581,169

Less current portion
1,911

 
4,158

 
$
576,503

 
$
577,011

 
(1) 
At June 28, 2016, the Company had $80.4 million of borrowing capacity available under its revolving credit facility (“Revolving Facility”), net of $29.6 million of outstanding letters of credit. At December 29, 2015, the Company had $80.9 million of borrowing capacity available under its Revolving Facility, net of $29.1 million of outstanding letters of credit.

The Company’s debt facilities contain restrictions on additional borrowings, certain asset sales, dividend payments, certain investments and related-party transactions, as well as requirements to maintain various financial ratios. At June 28, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants.

Based upon the amount of excess cash flow generated during the fiscal year and the Company’s leverage at fiscal year end, each of which is defined in the credit agreement governing the term loan, the Company may be required to make an excess cash flow mandatory prepayment. The excess cash flow mandatory prepayment is an annual requirement under the credit agreement and is due 95 days after the end of each fiscal year. The Company made a mandatory prepayment of $3.3 million on March 31, 2016 based on its fiscal 2015 results. The Company currently expects that it will not be required to make a mandatory prepayment in fiscal 2017. However, because this is a preliminary estimate, it is possible that an excess cash flow mandatory prepayment could ultimately be required.