XML 21 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Mineral properties and development costs
6 Months Ended
May 31, 2016
Mineral properties and development costs [Text Block]
4 Mineral properties and development costs

                in thousands of dollars  
    November 30, 2015     Acquisition costs     May 31, 2016  
    $       $       $    
Alaska, USA                  
Ambler (a)   26,586     -     26,586  
Bornite (b)   4,000     -     4,000  
Antioquia, Colombia                  
Titiribi (c)   3,264     -     3,264  
    33,850     -     33,850  

                in thousands of dollars  
    November 30, 2014     Acquisition costs     November 30, 2015  
    $     $     $  
Alaska, USA                  
Ambler (a)   26,586     -     26,586  
Bornite (b)   4,000     -     4,000  
Antioquia, Colombia                  
Titiribi (c)   -     3,264     3,264  
    30,586     3,264     33,850  

(a) Ambler

On January 11, 2010, NovaGold, through AGC, a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 100% of the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska, which contains the copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project and other mineralized targets within the volcanogenic massive sulfide belt. As consideration, NovaGold issued 931,098 shares with a fair value of $5.0 million and agreed to make two cash payments to the vendor of $12.0 million each in January 2011 and January 2012. The fair value of these cash payments were $11.1 million and $10.3 million, respectively, at the transaction date valued using a discount rate of approximately 8%. The January 2011 payment was made by NovaGold on January 7, 2011 and the January 2012 payment was made by NovaGold, in advance, on August 5, 2011. Total fair value of the consideration was $26.6 million, including transaction costs associated with the acquisition of $0.1 million. The vendor retained a 1% net smelter return royalty that the owner of the property (currently, NovaCopper US) can purchase at any time for a one-time payment of $10.0 million.

Prior to the acquisition in 2010, NovaGold held an option to earn a 51% interest in the property which was terminated upon entering into the purchase and sale agreement.

As discussed in note 1, the property was acquired by NovaCopper US on October 17, 2011 through a purchase and sale agreement with AGC.

(b) Bornite

On October 19, 2011, NovaCopper US acquired the exclusive right to explore and the non-exclusive right to access and enter on the Bornite lands, and lands deeded to NANA through the ANCSA, located adjacent to the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska. As consideration, NovaCopper US paid $4 million to acquire the right to explore and develop the combined Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects through an Exploration Agreement and Option to Lease with NANA. NANA also has the right to appoint a member to NovaCopper’s board of directors before April 2017. NANA has not exercised their right to appoint a board member at this time. Upon a decision to proceed with construction of a mine on the lands, NANA maintains the right to purchase between a 16%- 25% ownership interest in the mine or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after NovaCopper has recovered certain historical costs, including capital and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest, consideration will be payable equal to all historical costs incurred on the properties at the elected percentage purchased less $40 million, not to be less than zero. The parties would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs, including capital costs of the mine based on their pro-rata share.

NANA would also be granted a net smelter return royalty of between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use agreement, the amount of which is determined by the classification of land from which production originates.

(c) Titiribi

On June 19, 2015, NovaCopper completed the acquisition of Sunward. As a result, the Company, through Sunward BVI and its branch Sunward Resources Sucursal Colombia, owns 100% of the Titiribi gold-copper exploration project located southwest of the city of Medellin, in Antioquia Department, Colombia.

(d) Mineral properties expense

The following table summarizes mineral properties expense for the three and six months ended May 31, 2016 and 2015.

                in thousands of dollars  
    Three months ended           Six months ended  
    May 31, 2016     May 31, 2015     May 31, 2016     May 31, 2015  
    $       $     $       $  
Alaska, USA                        
Community   67     52     122     110  
Engineering   46     13     219     17  
Environmental   15     4     23     4  
Geochemistry and geophysics   1     -     13     -  
Land and permitting   111     69     209     135  
Project support   67     38     106     87  
Wages and benefits   150     115     298     265  
    457     291     990     618  
Antioquia, Colombia                        
Assaying   5     -     6     -  
Land and permitting   8     -     14     -  
Project support   49     -     99     -  
Professional fees   28     -     48     -  
Wages and benefits   64     -     121     -  
    154     -     288     -  
Mineral property expense   611     291     1,278     618  

Mineral property expenses consist of direct drilling, personnel, community, resource reporting and other exploration expenses as outlined above, as well as indirect project support expenses such as fixed wing charters, helicopter support, fuel, and other camp operation costs. Cumulative mineral properties expense in Alaska from the initial earn-in agreement on the property in 2004 to May 31, 2016 is $58.9 million and cumulative acquisition costs are $30.6 million totaling $89.5 million spent to date. Cumulative mineral properties expense in Colombia from the acquisition date of June 19, 2015 to May 31, 2016 is $0.6 million. During 2016, the Company classified certain lobbyist expenses previously recorded as land and permitting to community resulting in a reclassification adjustment of $0.03 million and $0.06 million respectively for the three and six months ended May 31, 2015 on the table above summarizing the mineral properties expense.