XML 53 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.2.0.727
Mineral properties and development costs
6 Months Ended
May. 31, 2015
Mineral properties and development costs [Text Block]
4

Mineral properties and development costs


                in thousands of dollars  
    November 30, 2014     Acquisition costs     May 31, 2015  
Alaska, USA     $     $       $  
Ambler (a)   26,586     -     26,586  
Bornite (b)   4,000     -     4,000  
    30,586     -     30,586  

(a)

Ambler

On January 11, 2010, NovaGold, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 100% of the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska, which contains the copper-zinc-lead-gold-silver Arctic Project and other mineralized targets within the volcanogenic massive sulfide belt. As consideration, NovaGold, issued 931,098 shares with a fair value of $5.0 million and agreed to make two cash payments to the vendor of $12.0 million each in January 2011 and January 2012, for total consideration of $29.0 million. The fair value of these future cash payments were $21.4 million valued at the transaction date using a discount rate of approximately 8%. The January 2011 payment was made on January 7, 2011 and the January 2012 payment was made in advance on August 5, 2011. Total fair value of the consideration was $26.5 million, including transaction costs associated with the acquisition of $0.1 million. The vendor retained a 1% net smelter return royalty that the can be purchased at any time for a one-time payment of $10.0 million.

Prior to the acquisition in 2010, NovaGold held an option to earn a 51% interest in the property which was terminated upon entering into the purchase and sale agreement.

As discussed in note 1, the property was acquired on October 17, 2011 by NovaCopper US through a purchase and sale agreement with AGC.

(b)

Bornite

On October 19, 2011, NovaCopper US acquired the exclusive right to explore and the non-exclusive right to access and enter on the Bornite lands and lands deeded to NANA through the ANCSA, located adjacent to the Ambler lands in Northwest Alaska. As consideration, NovaCopper US paid $4.0 million to acquire the right to explore and develop the combined Upper Kobuk Mineral Projects through an Exploration Agreement and Option to Lease with NANA. NANA also has the right to appoint a member to NovaCopper’s board of directors within a five year period following our public listing on a stock exchange. Upon a decision to proceed with construction of a mine on the lands, NANA maintains the right to purchase between a 16%- 25% ownership interest in the mine or retain a 15% net proceeds royalty which is payable after NovaCopper has recovered certain historical costs, capital and cost of capital. Should NANA elect to purchase an ownership interest, consideration will be payable equal to all historical costs incurred on the properties at the elected percentage purchased less $40.0 million, not to be less than zero. The parties would form a joint venture and be responsible for all future costs, including capital costs of the mine based on their pro-rata share.

NANA would also be granted a net smelter return royalty of between 1% and 2.5% upon the execution of a mining lease or a surface use agreement, the percent which is determined by the classification of land from which production originates.

(c)

Mineral properties expense

The following table summarizes mineral properties expense for the three and six months ended May 31, 2015 and 2014.

                in thousands of dollars  
    Three months ended  

  Six months ended

 
    May 31, 2015     May 31, 2014     May 31, 2015     May 31, 2014  
      $       $       $       $  
Community   21     23     49     34  
Engineering   13     27     17     102  
Environmental   4     -     4     15  
Land and permitting   100     96     196     189  
Project support   38     75     87     146  
Wages and benefits   115     268     265     583  
Mineral property expense   291     489     618     1,069  

Mineral property expenses consist of direct drilling, personnel, community, resource reporting and other exploration expenses as outlined above, as well as indirect project support expenses such as fixed wing charters, helicopter support, fuel, and other camp operation costs. Cumulative mineral properties expense from the initial earn-in agreement on the property in 2004 to May 31, 2015 is $54.4 million.