XML 44 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization – Fresh Medical Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated on November 22, 2004 and is doing business as “ProLung” in the United States and as “Freshmedx” outside the United States. The Company’s headquarters are located in Salt Lake City, Utah. The Company’s business is the development and deployment of medical devices and procedures specializing in the immediate, non-invasive evaluation of indeterminate lung masses suspicious for cancer as seen in CT and radiography. The Company’s principal activities have consisted of research and development, developing markets for its products, securing strategic alliances and obtaining financing. The Company has developed, tested, and is commercializing its non-invasive lung cancer risk stratification test, the “Electro Pulmonary Nodule Scan” (“EPN Scan”). In April 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to license this technology to a distributor for the China market. In May 2013, the Company received the “CE” mark in Europe permitting the marketing of the EPN Scan in the European Union and certain other countries. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company commenced selling the EPN Scan to customers in the European Union. In the United States, the Company has submitted its application for marketing approval to the United States Food and Drug Administration.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Hilltop Acquisition Corporation, Inc., which has had no activity since its inception and is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from the date of its formation.

 

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with rules and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and therefore certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for them to be presented fairly, with those adjustments consisting only of normal recurring adjustments. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements include in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 may not be indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.  The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, has been derived from the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements.

 

Business Condition – The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has just commenced selling the EPN Scan and has generated minimal revenues in the past from operations. Therefore, the Company has not yet achieved its planned level of operations. The Company has incurred substantial and recurring losses to date from operations, and has used cash in its operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and during the year ended December 31, 2013. Additionally, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit and a working capital deficit as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this risk and uncertainty.

 

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company successfully developing products that can be sold profitably, and in the near term successfully generating cash through financing and operating activities. Management’s plans include issuing equity or debt securities to fund capital requirements and ongoing operations. Additionally, the Company has commenced selling the EPN Scan during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. However, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in these efforts.

 

Revenue Recognition – The Company commenced selling the EPN Scan during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.  The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned.  The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when (1) it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement, (2) delivery has occurred, (3) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured.  Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, with foreign currencies reflected in U.S. dollars (based on the exchange rate on the date of sale and adjusted to current exchange rates at the end of each reporting period), and do not bear interest.  The Company uses an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in accounts receivable.  Account balances will be charged off against the allowance when the account receivable is considered uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts is an estimate that is particularly susceptible to change in the near term.  During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a provision for doubtful accounts in the amount of $95,000 for accounts receivable that had not been collected and were overdue at that date.  At September 30, 2014, the allowance for doubtful accounts is $95,000.

 

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share – The Company computes basic loss per share by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company computes diluted loss per share by dividing net loss by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the weighted-average dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. The computation of diluted loss per share does not assume exercise or conversion of securities that would have an anti-dilutive effect. As of September 30, 2014, there were warrants to purchase 748,211 shares of common stock outstanding, 895,433 non-vested shares of common stock and $155,000 of convertible notes that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share as they were anti-dilutive. As of September 30, 2013, there were warrants to purchase 576,650 shares of common stock outstanding, 1,483,618 non-vested shares of common stock, $379,588 of convertible notes payable, and $127,822 of convertible notes payable to related parties that were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per common share as they were anti-dilutive.

 

Reclassifications – Certain amounts of operating expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, have been reclassified in the current presentation to conform to the presentation of operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. These reclassifications had no effect on the total amount of operating expenses, on the amount of net loss, or on the basic and diluted loss per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 requires management to perform interim and annual assessments on whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued and to provide related disclosures, if required. ASU 2014-15 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2016 and subsequent interim periods. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2014-15 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities and Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Consolidation (“ASU 2014-10”), which removed the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the Accounting Standards Codification, thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  In addition, the amendments eliminated the requirements for development stage entities to: (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage.  The amendments also clarify that the guidance for risks and uncertainties is applicable to entities that have not yet commenced planned principal operations. 

 

The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements pertaining to development stage entities are to be applied retrospectively.  The amendments related to the disclosure of risks and uncertainties are to be applied prospectively.  ASU 2014-10 is effective for the Company for annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2015, and for the interim periods therein, with early application of each of the amendments permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued.  As a result, management adopted ASU 2014-10 as of April 1, 2014, applied the changes in disclosure retrospectively, and the effects of the adoption are reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes.  As described above, the adoption of ASU 2014-10 eliminated certain disclosures of information formerly required of development stage entities, including inception-to-date information in the accompanying statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity (deficit).  The adoption of ASU 2014-10 also recharacterized the deficit accumulated during the development stage as accumulated deficit in stockholders’ equity (deficit).  The elimination of these disclosure requirements had no other effect on the amounts reported for total assets, liabilities, stockholders’ equity (deficit), net loss, or loss per common share.

 

  In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which stipulates that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Company retrospectively beginning January 1, 2017, with early adoption not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.   In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (“ASU 2013-11”), to provide guidance on the presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. ASU 2013-11 requires an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows: to the extent a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. ASU 2013-11 is effective January 1, 2015 with earlier adoption permitted. ASU 2013-11 should be applied prospectively with retroactive application permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2013-11 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.