UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM
| Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
| For
Quarterly Period ended | |
| Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the transition period from __________ to _________.
Commission
File Number:
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
| The
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ |
| Accelerated filer | ☐ |
| ☒ | |
| Smaller reporting company | |
| Emerging growth company |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐
Outstanding Shares
As of August 3, 2022, the registrant had shares of common stock outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | ||
| PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
| Item 1. | Financial Statements | 3 |
| Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 21 |
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks | 48 |
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 48 |
| PART II—OTHER INFORMATION | ||
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 48 |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 49 |
| Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 51 |
| Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 51 |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 51 |
| Item 5. | Other Information | 51 |
| Item 6. | Exhibits | 52 |
| 2 |
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LIPOCINE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
| June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | $ | ||||||
| Marketable investment securities | ||||||||
| Accrued interest income | ||||||||
| Prepaid and other current assets | ||||||||
| Total current assets | ||||||||
| Marketable investment securities | ||||||||
| Contract asset | ||||||||
| Property and equipment,
net of accumulated depreciation of $ | ||||||||
| Other assets | ||||||||
| Total assets | $ | $ | ||||||
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | $ | ||||||
| Accrued expenses | ||||||||
| Debt - current portion | ||||||||
| Litigation settlement liability - current portion | ||||||||
| Total current liabilities | ||||||||
| Warrant liability | ||||||||
| Litigation settlement liability - non-current portion | ||||||||
| Total liabilities | ||||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (notes 6, 8, 9 and 11) | ||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity: | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, par value $ per share, shares authorized; issued and outstanding | ||||||||
| Common stock, par value $ per share, shares authorized; and issued and and outstanding | ||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
| Treasury stock at cost, shares | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accumulated deficit | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Total stockholders’ equity | ||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | $ | ||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
| 3 |
LIPOCINE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss
(Unaudited)
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Revenues: | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | ||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | ||||||||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Operating loss | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Other income (expense): | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest and investment income | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Unrealized gain on warrant liability | ||||||||||||||||
| Gain (loss) litigation settlement liability | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Total other income (expense), net | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Loss before income tax expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||
| Income tax expense | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Basic loss per share attributable to common stock | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted loss per share attributable to common stock | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted | ||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss: | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||
| Comprehensive loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
| 4 |
LIPOCINE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 and 2021
(Unaudited)
| Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional | Accumulated Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares | Amount | Number of Shares | Amount | Paid-In Capital | Comprehensive Loss | Accumulated Deficit | Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at March 31, 2021 | $ | | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized net gain on marketable investment securities | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs associated with ATM offering | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2021 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional | Accumulated Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares | Amount | Number of Shares | Amount | Paid-In Capital | Comprehensive Loss | Accumulated Deficit | Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2020 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized net loss on marketable investment securities | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option exercises | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock sold through equity offering | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued for warrant exercises | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Settlement of warrant liability on warrant exercises | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock sold through ATM offering | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2021 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional | Accumulated Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares | Amount | Number of Shares | Amount | Paid-In Capital | Comprehensive Gain (Loss) | Accumulated Deficit | Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at March 31, 2022 | $ | | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized net loss on marketable investment securities | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option Exercises | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs associated with ATM offering | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2022 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Additional | Accumulated Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares | Amount | Number of Shares | Amount | Paid-In Capital | Comprehensive Gain (Loss) | Accumulated Deficit | Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at December 31, 2021 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized net loss on marketable investment securities | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Option exercises | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Costs associated with ATM offering | - | - | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balances at June 30, 2022 | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
| 5 |
LIPOCINE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation expense | ||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | ||||||||
| Non-cash interest expense | ||||||||
| Non-cash gain on change in fair value of warrant liability | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Amortization of premium on marketable investment securities | ||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
| Accrued interest income | ( | ) | ||||||
| Prepaid and other current assets | ||||||||
| Accounts payable | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accrued expenses | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Litigation settlement liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Gain on extinguishment of litigation settlement liability | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash used in operating activities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of fixed assets | ( | ) | ||||||
| Purchases of marketable investment securities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Maturities of marketable investment securities | ||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in) investing activities | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Debt repayments | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| End of loan payment | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net proceeds from common stock offering | ||||||||
| Proceeds from (costs associated with) ATM | ( | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from stock option exercises | ||||||||
| Net proceeds from exercise of warrants | ||||||||
| Cash provided by (used in) financing activities | ( | ) | ||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | ( | ) | ||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period | ||||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period | $ | $ | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Interest paid | $ | $ | ||||||
| Income taxes paid | ||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activity: | ||||||||
| Settlement of warrant liability on warrant exercises | $ | $ | ||||||
| Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities | ( | ) | ( | ) | ||||
| Accrued final payment charge on debt | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
| 6 |
LIPOCINE INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Lipocine Inc. (“Lipocine” or the “Company”) in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are comprised of the financial statements of Lipocine and its subsidiaries, collectively referred to as the Company. In management’s opinion, the interim financial data presented includes all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring items) necessary for fair presentation. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain information required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) has been condensed or omitted in accordance with rules and regulations of the SEC. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period or for the year ending December 31, 2022.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2021.
The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions relating to reporting of the assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The Company believes that its existing capital resources, together with interest thereon, will be sufficient to meet its projected operating requirements through at least June 30, 2023 which includes an on-going clinical study for LPCN 1148 and compliance with regulatory requirements. The Company has based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and the Company could utilize its available capital resources sooner than it currently expects if additional activities are performed by the Company including clinical studies for LPCN 1148, LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, LPCN1107, LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101. While the Company believes it has sufficient liquidity and capital resources to fund our projected operating requirements through at least June 30, 2023, the Company will need to raise additional capital at some point through the equity or debt markets or via out-licensing activities, before or after June 30, 2023, to support its operations. If the Company is unsuccessful in raising additional capital, its ability to continue as a going concern may become a risk. Further, the Company’s operating plan may change, and the Company may need additional funds to meet operational needs and capital requirements for product development, regulatory compliance and clinical trial activities sooner than planned. In addition, the Company’s capital resources may be consumed more rapidly if it pursues additional clinical studies for LPCN 1148, LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, LPCN 1107, LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101. Conversely, the Company’s capital resources could last longer if it reduces expenses, reduces the number of activities currently contemplated under our operating plan, terminates, modifies the design or suspends on-going clinical studies or terminates or settles any on-going litigation activities.
(2) Revenue
The Company generates most of its revenue from license and royalty arrangements. At inception of each contract, the Company identifies the goods and services that have been promised to the customer and each of those that represent a distinct performance obligation, determines the transaction price including any variable consideration, allocates the transaction price to the distinct performance obligations and determines whether control transfers to the customer at a point in time or over time. Variable consideration is included in the transaction price to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. The Company reassess its reserves for variable consideration at each reporting date and makes adjustments, if necessary, which may affect revenue and earnings in periods in which any such changes become known.
See Note 8 for a description of the license agreement with Antares Pharma, Inc. (“Antares”). See Note 12 for a description of the agreement with Spriaso.
License Fees. For distinct license performance obligations, upfront license fees are recognized when the Company satisfies the underlying performance obligation. This generally occurs upon transfer of the right to use the Company’s licensed technology to the customer. In addition, license arrangements may include contingent milestone payments, which are due following achievement by our licensee of specified sales or regulatory milestones and the licensee and/or Company will fulfill its performance obligation prior to achievement of these milestones. Because of the uncertainty of the milestone achievement, and/or the dependence on sales of our licensee, variable consideration for contingent milestones is fully constrained and is not recognized as revenue until the milestone is achieved by our licensee, to the extent collectability is reasonably certain.
| 7 |
Royalties. Royalties revenue consists of sales-based and minimum royalties earned under licenses agreements for our products. Performance obligations under these licenses, which consist of the right to use the Company’s proprietary technology, are satisfied at a point in time corresponding with delivery of the underlying technology rights to the licensee, which is generally upon transfer of the licensed technology/product to the customer. Sales-based royalties revenue represents variable consideration under the license agreements and is recognized in the period a customer sells products incorporating the Company’s licensed technologies/products. The Company estimates sales-based royalties revenue earned but unpaid at each reporting period using information provided by the licensee. The Company’s license arrangements may also provide for minimum royalties, which the Company recognizes upon the satisfaction of the underlying performance obligation, which generally occurs with delivery of the underlying technology rights to the licensee. Sales-based and minimum royalties are generally due within 45 days after the end of each quarter in which they are earned.
Contract
Assets. Contract assets consist of minimum royalty revenue earned in relation to the license agreement but not yet payable based
on the terms of the contract. The contract asset as of June 30, 2022 is related to the Antares License Agreement. Based on the terms
of the license agreement, the Company estimates that it will receive a payment of approximately $
Revenue
Concentration. A major customer is considered to be one that comprises more than
Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus, where applicable, the additional potential common shares that would have been outstanding related to dilutive options, warrants and, unvested restricted stock units to the extent such shares are dilutive.
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Basic loss per share attributable to common stock: | ||||||||||||||||
| Numerator | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Denominator | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted avg. common shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic loss per share attributable to common stock | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Diluted loss per share attributable to common stock: | ||||||||||||||||
| Numerator | ||||||||||||||||
| Net loss | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Effect of dilutive securities on net loss: | ||||||||||||||||
| Common stock warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total net loss for purpose of calculating diluted net loss per common share | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| Denominator | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted avg. common shares outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Common stock warrants | ||||||||||||||||
| Total shares for purpose of calculating diluted net loss per common share | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted loss per share attributable to common stock | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | $ | ( | ) | ||||
| 8 |
| June 30, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Stock options | ||||||||
| Warrants | ||||||||
(4) Marketable Investment Securities
The Company has classified its marketable investment securities as available-for-sale securities, all of which are debt securities. These securities are carried at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity until realized. Gains and losses on investment security transactions are reported on the specific-identification method. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. The amortized cost, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized holding losses, and fair value for available-for-sale securities by major security type and class of security at June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were as follows:
| June 30, 2022 | Amortized Cost | Gross unrealized holding gains | Gross unrealized holding losses | Aggregate fair value | ||||||||||||
| Government treasury bills | $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||
| Corporate bonds, notes and commercial paper | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | Amortized Cost | Gross unrealized holding gains | Gross unrealized holding losses | Aggregate fair value | ||||||||||||
| Government treasury bills | $ | ( | ) | $ | ||||||||||||
| Commercial paper | ( | ) | ||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | ( | ) | $ | |||||||||||
Maturities of debt securities classified as available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2022 are as follows:
| June 30, 2022 | Amortized Cost | Aggregate fair value | ||||||
| Due within one year | $ | $ | ||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||
| 9 |
There
were
(5) Fair Value
The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible. The Company determines fair value based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in the principal or most advantageous market. When considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, the following fair value hierarchy distinguishes between observable and unobservable inputs, which are categorized in one of the following levels:
| ● | Level 1 Inputs: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. | |
| ● | Level 2 Inputs: Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuation in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. | |
| ● | Level 3 Inputs: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. |
All of the Company’s financial instruments are valued using quoted prices in active markets or based on other observable inputs. For accrued interest income, prepaid and other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, the carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The following table presents the placement in the fair value hierarchy of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021:
| Fair value measurements at reporting date using | ||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2022 | Level 1 inputs | Level 2 inputs | Level 3 inputs | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash equivalents - money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Government treasury bills | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial paper | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds and notes | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Warrant liability | $ | |||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
| Fair value measurements at reporting date using | ||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | Level 1 inputs | Level 2 inputs | Level 3 inputs | |||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash equivalents - money market funds | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| Government treasury bills | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial paper | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds and notes | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Warrant liability | $ | |||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
| 10 |
The following methods and assumptions were used to determine the fair value of each class of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the balance sheets:
Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents primarily consist of highly-rated money market funds and treasury bills with original maturities to the Company of three months or less and are purchased daily at par value with specified yield rates. Cash equivalents related to money market funds and treasury bills are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices or broker or dealer quotations for similar assets.
Government treasury bills: The Company uses a third-party pricing service to value these investments. United States treasury bills are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and reportable trades.
Corporate bonds, notes, and commercial paper: The Company uses a third-party pricing service to value these investments. Corporate bonds, notes and commercial paper are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using broker/dealer quotes, bids and offers, benchmark yields and credit spreads and other observable inputs.
Warrant liability: The warrant liability (which relates to warrants to purchase shares of common stock) is marked-to-market each reporting period with the change in fair value recorded to other income (expense) in the accompanying statements of operations until the warrants are exercised, expire or other facts and circumstances lead the warrant liability to be reclassified to stockholders’ equity. The fair value of the warrant liability is estimated using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The significant assumptions used in preparing the option pricing model for valuing the warrant liability as of June 30, 2022, include (i) volatility of %, (ii) risk free interest rate of %, (iii) strike price of $, (iv) fair value of common stock of $, and (v) expected life of years. The significant assumptions used in preparing the option pricing model for valuing the warrant liability as of December 31, 2021, include (i) volatility of %, (ii) risk free interest rate of %, (iii) strike price of $, (iv) fair value of common stock of $, and (v) expected life of years.
The Company’s accounting policy is to recognize transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy on the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022.
(6) Loan and Security Agreements and Other Liabilities
Silicon Valley Bank Loan
On
January 5, 2018, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”) with Silicon
Valley Bank (“SVB”) pursuant to which SVB agreed to lend the Company $
(7) Income Taxes
The tax provision for interim periods is determined using an estimate of the Company’s effective tax rate for the full year adjusted for discrete items, if any, that are taken into account in the relevant period. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if the estimated tax rate changes, the Company makes a cumulative adjustment.
At June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company had a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, net of expected reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities, as it believes it is more likely than not that these benefits will not be realized.
(8) Contractual Agreements
(a) Abbott Products, Inc.
On
March 29, 2012, the Company terminated its collaborative agreement with Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (later acquired by Abbott
Products, Inc.) for TLANDO. As part of the termination, the Company reacquired the rights to the intellectual property from Abbott.
All obligations under the prior license agreement have been completed except that Lipocine will owe Abbott a perpetual
| 11 |
(b) Antares Pharma, Inc.
On
October 14, 2021, the Company entered into a license agreement (“License Agreement”) with Antares Pharma, Inc. (“Antares”)
pursuant to which the Company granted to Antares an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop and commercialize,
upon final approval of TLANDO® from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Company’s TLANDO product
with respect to testosterone replacement therapy in males for conditions associated with a deficiency or absence of endogenous testosterone,
as indicated in NDA No. 208088, treatment of Klinefelter syndrome, and pediatric indications relating to testosterone replacement therapy
in males for conditions associated with a deficiency or absence of endogenous testosterone (the “Field”), in each case within
the United States. The Antares License Agreement also provided Antares with an option, exercisable on or before March 31, 2022, to license
TLANDO XR (LPCN 1111), the Company’s potential once-daily oral product candidate for testosterone replacement therapy. On April
1, 2022, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the License Agreement (the “Amendment”), pursuant to which the License
Agreement was amended to extend the deadline by which Antares shall exercise its option to license TLANDO XR to June 30, 2022. As consideration
for the Company agreeing to enter into the Amendment, in April 2022 Antares paid the Company a non-refundable cash fee of $
On May 24, 2022, Halozyme Therapeutics completed an acquisition of Antares Pharma Inc. through the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Halozyme with and into Antares, with Antares continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Halozyme.
(c) Contract Research and Development
The
Company has entered into agreements with various contract organizations that conduct pre-clinical, clinical, analytical and manufacturing
development work on behalf of the Company as well as a number of independent contractors and primarily clinical researchers who serve
as advisors to the Company. The Company incurred expenses of $
(9) Leases
The Company has a non-cancelable operating lease for office space and laboratory facilities in Salt Lake City, Utah. The term of the lease has been extended through February 28, 2023.
| 12 |
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases as of June 30, 2022 are:
| Operating | ||||
| leases | ||||
| Year ending December 31: | ||||
| 2022 | $ | |||
| 2023 | ||||
| Total minimum lease payments | $ | |||
The
Company’s rent expense was $
(10) Stockholders’ Equity
On June 8, 2022, at the 2022 annual meeting of the stockholders, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $, from shares to shares. The Company filed the amendment to the Restated Certificate with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on June 28, 2022. The amendment to the Restated Certificate became effective upon filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
(a) Issuance of Common Stock
On
January 28, 2021, the Company completed a public offering of securities registered under an effective registration statement filed pursuant
to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“January 2021 Offering”). The gross proceeds from the January 2021 Offering were
approximately $
On
February 27, 2020, the Company completed a registered direct offering of securities registered under an effective registration statement
filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“February 2020 Offering”). The gross proceeds from the February
2020 Offering were approximately $
On
November 18, 2019, the Company completed a public offering of securities registered under an effective registration statement filed pursuant
to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“November 2019 Offering”). The gross proceeds from the November 2019 Offering
were approximately $
On
March 6, 2017, the Company entered into the Sales Agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”) pursuant to which
the Company may issue and sell, from time to time, shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to the amount
the Company registered on an effective registration statement pursuant to which the offering is being made. The Company currently has
registered up to $
| 13 |
The shares of the Company’s common stock sold under the Sales Agreement are sold and issued pursuant to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-250072) (the “Form S-3”), which was previously declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the related prospectus and one or more prospectus supplements.
The Company is not obligated to make any sales of its common stock under the Sales Agreement. The offering of common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement will terminate upon the termination of the Sales Agreement as permitted therein. The Company and Cantor may each terminate the Sales Agreement at any time upon ten days’ prior notice.
As
of June 30, 2022, the Company had sold an aggregate of shares at a weighted-average sales price of $ per share under the
Sales Agreement for aggregate gross proceeds of $
(b) Rights Agreement
On
November 13, 2015, the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as Rights Agent, entered into a Rights Agreement.
Also on November 12, 2015, the board of directors of the Company authorized and the Company declared a dividend of one preferred stock
purchase right (each a “Right” and collectively, the “Rights”) for each outstanding share of common stock of
the Company. The dividend was payable to stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 30, 2015 and entitles the registered
holder to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a fully paid non-assessable share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred
Stock of the Company at a price of $
In general, in the event a person becomes an Acquiring Person, then each Right not owned by such Acquiring Person will entitle its holder to purchase from the Company, at the Right’s then current exercise price, in lieu of shares of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, common stock of the Company with a market value of twice the Purchase Price. In addition, if after any person has become an Acquiring Person, (a) the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination, or (b) 50% or more of the Company’s assets, or assets accounting for 50% or more of its earning power, are sold, leased, exchanged or otherwise transferred (in one or more transactions), proper provision shall be made so that each holder of a Right (other than the Acquiring Person, its affiliates and associates and certain transferees thereof, whose Rights became void) shall thereafter have the right to purchase from the acquiring corporation, for the Purchase Price, that number of shares of common stock of the acquiring corporation which at the time of such transaction would have a market value of twice the Purchase Price.
The
Company will be entitled to redeem the Rights at $
| 14 |
(c) Share-Based Payments
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for grants of stock option awards, restricted stock units and restricted stock under the Company’s Incentive Plan to employees, nonemployees and nonemployee members of the Company’s board of directors based on the grant-date fair value of those awards. The grant-date fair value of an award is generally recognized as compensation expense over the award’s requisite service period. In addition, the Company has granted performance-based stock option awards and restricted stock units, which vest based upon the Company satisfying certain performance conditions. Potential compensation cost, measured on the grant date, related to these performance options will be recognized only if, and when, the Company estimates that these options or units will vest, which is based on whether the Company considers the performance conditions to be probable of attainment. The Company’s estimates of the number of performance-based options or units that will vest will be revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes model to compute the estimated fair value of stock option awards. Using this model, fair value is calculated based on assumptions with respect to (i) expected volatility of the Company’s common stock price, (ii) the periods of time over which employees and members of the board of directors are expected to hold their options prior to exercise (expected term), (iii) expected dividend yield on the Common Stock, and (iv) risk-free interest rates. Stock-based compensation expense also includes an estimate, which is made at the time of grant, of the number of awards that are expected to be forfeited. This estimate is revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Stock-based compensation cost that has been expensed in the statements of operations amounted to approximately $ and $, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, and approximately $ and $, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, and is allocated as follows:
| Three
Months Ended June 30, | Six
Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | $ | $ | $ | ||||||||||||
| General and administrative | ||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||
The Company issued stock options and stock options, respectively, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and issued and stock options during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021.
Key assumptions used in the determination of the fair value of stock options granted are as follows:
Expected Term: The expected term represents the period that the stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding. Due to limited historical experience of similar awards, the expected term was estimated using the simplified method in accordance with the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, Share-Based Payment, for awards with stated or implied service periods. The simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the contractual term and the vesting period of the stock option. For awards with performance conditions, and that have the contractual term to satisfy the performance condition, the contractual term was used.
Risk-Free Interest Rate: The risk-free interest rate used was based on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term.
Expected Dividend: The expected dividend assumption is based on management’s current expectation about the Company’s anticipated dividend policy. The Company does not anticipate declaring dividends in the foreseeable future.
Expected Volatility: The volatility factor is based solely on the Company’s trading history.
| 15 |
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Expected term | years | years | ||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | ||||||
| Expected dividend yield | ||||||||
| Expected volatility | % | % | ||||||
FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, requires the Company to recognize compensation expense for the portion of options that are expected to vest. Therefore, the Company applied estimated forfeiture rates that were derived from historical employee termination behavior. If the actual number of forfeitures differs from those estimated by management, additional adjustments to compensation expense may be required in future periods.
As of June 30, 2022, there was $ million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock option plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures.
(d) Stock Option Plan
In April 2014, the board of directors adopted the 2014 Stock and Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”) subject to shareholder approval which was received in June 2014. The 2014 Plan provides for the granting of nonqualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock and dividend equivalents. An aggregate of shares were authorized for issuance under the 2014 Plan. Additionally, remaining authorized shares under the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”) were issuable under the 2014 Plan at the time of the 2014 Plan adoption. Upon receiving shareholder approval in June 2016, the 2014 Plan was amended and restated to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock of the Company issuable under all awards granted under the 2014 Plan from to . Additionally, upon receiving shareholder approval in June 2018, the 2014 Plan was further amended and restated to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock of the Company issuable under all awards granted under the 2014 Plan from to . Finally, upon receiving shareholder approval in June 2020, the 2014 Plan was further amended and restated to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock of the Company issuable under all awards granted under the 2014 Plan from to . The board of directors, on an option-by-option basis, determines the number of shares, exercise price, term, and vesting period for options granted. Options granted generally have a -year contractual life. The Company issues shares of common stock upon the exercise of options with the source of those shares of common stock being either newly issued shares or shares held in treasury. An aggregate of shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under the 2014 Plan, with shares remaining available for grant as of June 30, 2022.
| Outstanding stock options | ||||||||
| Number of shares | Weighted average exercise price | |||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | |||||||
| Options granted | ||||||||
| Options exercised | ( | ) | ||||||
| Options forfeited | ( | ) | ||||||
| Options cancelled | ( | ) | ||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2022 | ||||||||
| Options exercisable at June 30, 2022 | ||||||||
| 16 |
| Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number outstanding | Weighted average remaining contractual life (Years) | Weighted average exercise price | Aggregate intrinsic value | Number exerciseable | Weighted average remaining contractual life (Years) | Weighted average exercise price | Aggregate intrinsic value | |||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | $ | $ | $ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value and the exercise price. There were and , respectively, stock options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, and there were and stock options exercised during the three and six months ended June 30, 2021.
(e) Common Stock Warrants
The Company accounts for its common stock warrants under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, which requires any financial instrument, other than an outstanding share, that, at inception, embodies an obligation to repurchase the issuer’s equity shares, or is indexed to such an obligation, and requires or may require the issuer to settle the obligation by transferring assets, to be classified as a liability. In accordance with ASC 480, the Company’s outstanding warrants from the November 2019 Offering are classified as a liability. The liability is adjusted to fair value at each reporting period, with the changes in fair value recognized as gain (loss) on change in fair value of warranty liability in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The warrants issued in the November 2019 Offering allow the warrant holder, if certain change in control events occur, the option to receive an amount of cash equal to the value of the warrants as determined in accordance with the Black-Scholes option pricing model with certain defined assumptions upon a fundamental transaction.
As of June 30, 2022, the Company had common stock warrants outstanding from the November 2019 Offering to purchase an equal number of shares of common stock. The fair value of these warrants on June 30, 2022 and on December 31, 2021 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following Level 3 inputs (as defined in the November 2019 Offering):
| June 30, 2022 | December 31, 2021 | |||||||
| Expected life in years | ||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | % | % | ||||||
| Dividend yield | ||||||||
| Volatility | % | % | ||||||
| Stock price | $ | $ | ||||||
| 17 |
During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company recorded a non-cash gain of $
| Warrant Liability | ||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $ | |||
| Settlement of liability on warrant exercise | ||||
| Change in fair value of common stock warrants | ( | ) | ||
| Balance at June 30, 2022 | $ | |||
Additionally,
in the February 2020 Offering, the Company issued common stock warrants, however, because these warrants do not provide the
warrant holder the option to put the warrant back to the Company, the warrants are classified as equity. As of June 30, 2022, there were
The following table summarizes the number of common stock warrants outstanding and the weighted average exercise price:
| Warrants | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2021 | $ | |||||||
| Issued | ||||||||
| Exercised | ||||||||
| Expired | ||||||||
| Cancelled | ||||||||
| Forfeited | ||||||||
| Balance at June 30, 2022 | $ | |||||||
During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, common stock warrants were exercised. During the three and six months ended June
30, 2021, and common stock warrants to purchase one share of our common stock were exercised, resulting in proceeds of
approximately $
The following table summarizes information about common stock warrants outstanding at June 30, 2022:
| Warrants outstanding | ||||||||||||
| Number exercisable | Weighted average remaining contractual life (Years) | Weighted average exercise price | Aggregate intrinsic value | |||||||||
| $ | $ | |||||||||||
| 18 |
(11) Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims and other legal matters from time to time that arise in the ordinary course of conducting business. The Company records a liability when a particular contingency is probable and estimable.
On
April 2, 2019, the Company filed a lawsuit against Clarus in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that
Clarus’s JATENZO® product infringes six of Lipocine’s issued U.S. patents: 9,034,858; 9,205,057; 9,480,690; 9,757,390;
6,569,463; and 6,923,988. However; on February 11, 2020, the Company voluntarily dismissed allegations of patent infringement for expired
U.S. Patent Nos. 6,569,463 and 6,923,988 in an effort to streamline the issues and associated costs for dispute. Clarus has answered
the complaint and asserted counterclaims of non-infringement, inequitable conduct and invalidity. The Company answered Clarus’s
counterclaims on April 29, 2019. The Court held a scheduling conference on August 15, 2019, a claim construction hearing on February
11, 2020 and a Summary Judgment Hearing on January 15, 2021. In May 2021, the Court granted Clarus’ motion for Summary Judgment,
finding the asserted claims of Lipocine’s U.S. patents 9,034,858; 9,205,057; 9,480,690; and 9,757,390 invalid for failure to satisfy
the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Clarus still had remaining counterclaims before the Court. On July 13, 2021,
Clarus and the Company entered into a global settlement agreement (“Global Agreement’) which resolved all outstanding claims
of this litigation as well as the on-going United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Interference No. 106,128 between
the parties. Under the terms of the Global Agreement, the Company agreed to pay Clarus $
On
November 14, 2019, the Company and certain of its officers were named as defendants in a purported shareholder class action lawsuit,
Solomon Abady v. Lipocine Inc. et al., 2:19-cv-00906-PMW, filed in the United District Court for the District of Utah. The complaint
alleges that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that our filing of the NDA for TLANDO to
the FDA contained deficiencies and as a result the defendants’ statements about our business and operations were false and misleading
and/or lacked a reasonable basis in violation of federal securities laws. The lawsuit seeks certification as a class action (for a purported
class of purchasers of the Company’s securities from March 27, 2019 through November 8, 2019), compensatory damages in an unspecified
amount, and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. The Company has insurance that covers claims of this nature. The retention amount
payable by the Company under our policy is $
On March 13, 2020, the Company filed U.S. patent application serial number 16/818,779 (“the Lipocine ‘779 Application”) with the USPTO. On October 16 and November 3, 2020, Lipocine filed suggestions for interference with the USPTO requesting that a patent interference be declared between the Lipocine ‘779 Application and US patent application serial number 16/656,178 to Clarus Therapeutics, Inc. (“the Clarus ‘178 Application”). Pursuant to the Company’s request, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) at the USPTO declared the interference on January 4, 2021 to ultimately determine, as between the Company and Clarus, who is entitled to the claimed subject matter. The interference number is 106,128, and the Company was initially declared Senior Party. A conference call with the PTAB was held on January 25, 2021 to discuss proposed motions. On February 1, 2021, the PTAB issued an order authorizing certain motions and setting the schedule for the preliminary motions phase. On July 13, 2021, Clarus and the Company entered into the Global Agreement to resolve interference No. 106,128 among other items. On July 26, 2021, the PTAB granted the Company’s request for adverse judgment in interference No. 106,128 in accordance with the Global Agreement.
Beyond Solomon Abady v. Lipocine Inc. et al., 2:19-cv-00906-PM matter, management does not currently believe that any other matter, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into agreements, such as lease agreements, licensing agreements, clinical trial agreements, and certain services agreements, containing standard guarantee and / or indemnification provisions. Additionally, the Company has indemnified its directors and officers to the maximum extent permitted under the laws of the State of Delaware.
| 19 |
(12) Related Party Transactions
Spriaso, LLC Service Agreement
The
Company has a license and a services agreement with Spriaso, LLC (“Spriaso”), a related-party that is majority-owned by certain
current and former directors of Lipocine Inc. and their affiliates. Under the license agreement, the Company assigned and transferred
to Spriaso all of the Company’s rights, title and interest in its intellectual property to develop products for the cough and cold
field. In addition, Spriaso received all rights and obligations under the Company’s product development agreement with a third-party.
In exchange, the Company will receive a royalty of
(13) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Pronouncements Issued Not Yet Adopted
In 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”). This standard replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses on instruments within its scope, including trade receivables, and requires entities to measure all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The original effective date for ASU 2016-13 was for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019.
However, in October 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Derivatives and Hedging, and Leases: Effective Dates, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2016-13 for certain entities, including those that are eligible to be smaller reporting companies. A company’s determination about whether it is eligible for the deferral is a one-time assessment as of November 15, 2019 based on its most recent determination of its small reporting company eligibility as of the last business day of the most recently completed second quarter. Based on this determination, the Company qualifies as a smaller reporting entity and is therefore eligible for the deferral of adoption of ASU 2016-13, resulting in a new effective date of January 1, 2023. The Company has historically not had credit losses on financial instruments and is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-13 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
| 20 |
| ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this report. For additional context with which to understand our financial condition and results of operations, see the management’s discussion and analysis included in our Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 9, 2022, our first quarter Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 9, 2022, as well as the financial statements and related notes contained therein.
As used in the discussion below, “we,” “our,” and “us” refers to Lipocine.
Forward-Looking Statements
This section and other parts of this report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements may refer to such matters as products, product benefits, pre-clinical and clinical development timelines, clinical and regulatory expectations and plans, expected responses to regulatory actions, anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products and services, anticipated market performance, expected research and development and other expenses, future expectations for liquidity and capital resources needs and similar matters. Such words as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “continue”, “estimate”, “project”, and “intend” and similar terms and expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part II, Item 1A (Risk Factors) of this Form 10-Q, or in Part II, Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on May 9, 2022 or in Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 9, 2022. Except as required by applicable law, we assume no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Overview of Our Business
We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on metabolic and CNS disorders using our proprietary oral drug delivery technology. Our proprietary delivery technologies are designed to improve patient compliance and safety through orally available treatment options. Our primary development programs are based on oral delivery solutions for poorly bioavailable drugs. We have a portfolio of differentiated innovative product candidates that target high unmet needs for neurological and psychiatric CNS disorders, liver diseases, and hormone supplementation for men and women. We entered into a license agreement for the development and commercialization our product candidate, TLANDO®, an oral testosterone replacement therapy (“TRT”) comprised of testosterone undecanoate (“TU”). On October 14, 2021, we entered into a license agreement (the “Antares License Agreement”) with Antares Pharma, Inc. (“Antares” or our “Licensee”), pursuant to which we granted to Antares an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop and commercialize, upon final approval of TLANDO from the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the TLANDO product for TRT in the U.S. TLANDO is a registered trademark assigned to Antares. Any FDA required post-marketing studies will also be the responsibility of our licensee, Antares. On March 28, 2022, Antares received approval from the FDA for TLANDO as a TRT in adult males for conditions associated with a deficiency of endogenous testosterone, also known as hypogonadism. On May 24, 2022, Halozyme Therapeutics completed an acquisition of Antares Pharma Inc. through a merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Halozyme with and into Antares, with Antares continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Halozyme. On June 7, 2022, Halozyme announced the commercial launch of TLANDO®, an oral treatment indicated for testosterone replacement therapy in adult males for conditions associated with a deficiency or absence of endogenous testosterone (primary or hypogonadotropic hypogonadism).
Additional pipeline candidates include: LPCN 1148 comprising a novel prodrug of testosterone, testosterone laurate (“TL”), for the management of decompensated cirrhosis; LPCN 1144, an oral prodrug of androgen receptor modulator for the treatment of non-cirrhotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (“NASH”) which has completed phase 2 testing; LPCN 1111, a next generation oral TRT product comprised of testosterone tridecanoate (“TT”) with the potential for once daily dosing which has completed Phase 2 testing; LPCN 1107, potentially the first oral hydroxy progesterone caproate (“HPC”) product indicated for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth (“PTB”), which has completed a dose finding clinical study in pregnant women and has been granted orphan drug designation by the FDA; LPCN 1154 for postpartum depression (“PPD”); and LPCN 2101 for epilepsy.
| 21 |
The following chart summarizes the status of our product candidate development programs:
To date, we have funded our operations primarily through the sale of equity securities, debt and convertible debt and through up-front payments, research funding and royalty and milestone payments from our license and collaboration arrangements. We have not generated any revenues from product sales and we do not expect to generate revenue from product sales and we do not expect to generate revenue, other than TLANDO royalties and potential milestone payments from product sales by Antares, unless and until we obtain regulatory approval of our pipeline product candidates.
We have incurred losses in most years since our inception. As of June 30, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $178.8 million. Income and losses fluctuate year to year, primarily depending on the nature and timing of research and development occurring on our product candidates. Our net loss was $6.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022, compared to $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021. Substantially all of our operating losses resulted from expenses incurred in connection with our product candidate development programs, our research activities and general and administrative costs including litigation costs, associated with our operations.
We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future as we:
| ● | conduct further development of our other product candidates, including LPCN 1148, LPCN 1144, LPCN 1107, LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101; | |
| ● | continue our research efforts; | |
| ● | research new products or new uses for our existing products; | |
| ● | maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; and | |
| ● | provide general and administrative support for our operations. |
To fund future long-term operations, including the potential commercialization of any of our product candidates, we will need to raise additional capital. The amount and timing of future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including capital market conditions, the commercial success of TLANDO, regulatory requirements related to our other product development programs, the timing and results of our ongoing development efforts, the potential expansion of our current development programs, potential new development programs, our ability to license our products to third parties, the pursuit of various potential commercial activities and strategies associated with our development programs and related general and administrative support. We anticipate that we will seek to fund our operations through public or private equity or debt financings or other sources, such as potential license, partnering and collaboration agreements. We cannot be certain that anticipated additional financing will be available to us on favorable terms, in amounts sufficient to fund our operations or at all. Although we have previously been successful in obtaining financing through public and private equity securities offerings and our license and collaboration agreements, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in the future.
| 22 |
Corporate Strategy
Our goal is to become a leading biopharmaceutical company focused on applying our proprietary drug delivery technology for the development of pharmaceutical products focusing on neuroendocrine and metabolic disorders. The key components of our strategy are to:
Build a diversified multi-asset pipeline of novel therapies. We intend to employ a value-driven strategy based on our proprietary technology platform to identify and develop product candidates for neuroendocrine and metabolic disorders including Central Nervous System (“CNS”) disorders and end stage diseases such as decompensated cirrhosis. We intend to focus on product candidates that we believe are differentiated, have attractive profiles, and address a clear unmet medical need that we can advance quickly and efficiently into late-stage development.
Advance LPCN 1148, a unique prodrug of androgen receptor agonist to manage end stage (decompensated) liver cirrhosis disease. We believe LPCN 1148, a novel prodrug of testosterone, could address a significant unmet medical need in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis accompanied with muscle disorder such as secondary sarcopenia. Sarcopenia in male cirrhotic patients is known to be independently associated with poor outcomes including quality of life, increased decompensation events such as hepatic encephalopathy, increased hospital admissions, and increased mortality rate. We believe LPCN 1148 may be eligible for an orphan drug designation. Enrollment in a multi-center placebo-controlled phase 2 trial is currently ongoing.
Support our licensee in commercialization of our licensed oral TRT option. We believe the TRT market needs a differentiated, convenient oral option. We have exclusively licensed rights to TLANDO to Antares for commercialization of TLANDO in the US. We plan to support our licensee’s efforts to effectively enable the availability of TLANDO to patients in a timely manner, in addition to receiving milestone and royalty payments associated with TLANDO commercialization as agreed to in the Antares License Agreement.
Develop partnership(s) to continue the advancement of pipeline assets. We continuously strive to prioritize our resources in seeking co-development partnerships of our pipeline assets. We currently plan to explore partnering of LPCN 1144, our candidate for treatment of non-cirrhotic NASH, LPCN 1107, our candidate for prevention of pre-term birth, and LPCN 1111, a once-a-day therapy candidate for TRT.
Our Product and Product Candidates
Our pipeline of clinical candidates includes LPCN 1148, an androgen therapy for the management of cirrhosis, LPCN 1144, an oral androgen therapy for the treatment of non-cirrhotic NASH, LPCN 1111, a next-generation potential once daily oral TRT, LPCN 1107, an oral therapy for the prevention of PTB, LPCN 1154 for postpartum depression (“PPD”) and LPCN 2101 for epilepsy. We will continue to explore other product candidates targeting indications with a significant unmet need.
Our products are based on our proprietary Lip’ral drug delivery technology platform. Lip’ral based TLANDO was approved in March 2022. Lip’ral technology is a patented technology based on lipidic compositions which form an optimal dispersed phase in the gastrointestinal environment for improved absorption of insoluble drugs. The drug loaded dispersed phase presents the solubilized drug efficiently at the absorption site (gastrointestinal tract membrane) thus improving the absorption process and making the drug less dependent on physiological variables such as dilution, gastro-intestinal pH and food effects for absorption. Lip’ral based formulation enables improved solubilization and higher drug-loading capacity, which can lead to improved bioavailability, reduced dose, faster and more consistent absorption, reduced variability, reduced sensitivity to food effects, improved patient compliance, and targeted lymphatic delivery where appropriate.
TLANDO: An Oral Product for Testosterone Replacement Therapy
As previously described, under the Antares License Agreement, we granted to Antares an exclusive, royalty-bearing, sublicensable right and license to develop and commercialize, upon final approval of TLANDO from the FDA, our TLANDO product for TRT in the U.S. On December 8, 2020, the FDA provided tentative approval for TLANDO as a TRT in adult males for conditions associated with a deficiency of endogenous testosterone, also known as hypogonadism. The FDA provided final approval of TLANDO on March 28, 2022. Any FDA requirement to conduct certain post-marketing studies will be the responsibility of our licensee, Antares. On May 24, 2022, Halozyme Therapeutics completed an acquisition of Antares Pharma Inc. through a merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Halozyme with and into Antares, with Antares continuing as the surviving corporation and becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Halozyme.
| 23 |
Proof-of-concept for TLANDO was initially established in 2006, and subsequently TLANDO was licensed in 2009 to Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., which was then acquired by Abbott Products, Inc. (“Abbott”). Following a portfolio review associated with the spin-off of AbbVie Inc. by Abbott in 2011, the rights to TLANDO were reacquired by us. All obligations under the prior license agreement have been completed except that Lipocine will owe Abbott a perpetual 1% royalty on net sales. Such royalties are limited to $1 million in the first two calendar years following product launch, after which period there is no cap on royalties and no maximum aggregate amount. If generic versions of any such product are introduced, then royalties are reduced by 50%. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, we incurred royalty expense of $17,000 resulting from the commercial launch of TLANDO in June 2022.
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act (“PREA”), since TLANDO received full FDA approval, under the Antares Licensing Agreement Antares will need to address the PREA requirement to assess the safety and effectiveness of TLANDO in pediatric patients. The FDA may also require certain post-marketing studies to be conducted which will also be the responsibility of our licensee, Antares.
Upon execution of the Antares License Agreement, Antares paid to us an initial payment of $11.0 million. Antares will also make additional payments of $5.0 million to us on each of January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2026, provided that certain conditions are satisfied. We are also eligible to receive milestone payments of up to $160.0 million in the aggregate, depending on the achievement of certain sales milestones in a single calendar year with respect to all products licensed by Antares under the Antares License Agreement. In addition, upon commercialization, we will receive tiered royalty payments at rates ranging from percentages in the mid-teens to up to 20% of net sales of TLANDO in the United States, subject to certain minimum royalty obligations. Further, on October 14, 2021, we assigned our Manufacturing Agreement, dated August 27, 2013, by and between the Company and Encap Drug Delivery (the “Manufacturing Agreement”) to Antares as part of the Antares License Agreement.
We are exploring the possibility of licensing LPCN 1021 (known as TLANDO in the United States) to third parties outside the United States, although no licensing agreement has been entered into by the Company. If and when an agreement is made with a partner, such arrangement would likely be contingent upon obtaining acceptable cost of goods by securing an agreement with a new manufacturer in addition to obtaining local regulatory approval. No assurance can be given that any license agreement will be completed, or, if an agreement is completed, that such an agreement would be on terms favorable to us.
Our Development Pipeline
LPCN 1148: Oral Product Candidate for the Management of Decompensated Cirrhosis
We are currently evaluating LPCN 1148 comprising testosterone laurate (“TL”) for the management of decompensated cirrhosis. We believe LPCN 1148 targets unmet needs for cirrhosis subjects including improvement in the quality of life of patients while on the liver transplant waiting list, prevention or reduction in the occurrence of new decompensation events, and improvement in post liver transplant survival, including outcomes and costs.
We are currently conducting a Phase 2 proof of concept (“POC”) study (NCT04874350) in male cirrhotic subjects to evaluate the therapeutic potential of LPCN 1148 for the management of sarcopenia. The ongoing Phase 2 POC study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study in male sarcopenic cirrhotic patients. Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to one of two arms. The treatment arm is an oral dose of LPCN 1148, and the second arm is a matching placebo. The primary endpoint is change in skeletal muscle index at week 24 with key secondary endpoints including change in liver frailty index, rates of breakthrough hepatic encephalopathy, and number of waitlist events, including all-cause mortality. Total treatment is expected to be 52 weeks. We currently expect enrollment in the Phase 2 study to be complete in the second half of 2022 and top-line 24-week results in the first half of 2023.
Possible outcomes of interest from the Phase 2 study include clinical outcomes such as overall survival and new decompensation events (including hepatic encephalopathy and/or ascites occurrences), rates of survival to transplant, rates of hospitalizations, infections, etc., muscle changes such as muscle mass, body composition, myosteatosis (muscle fat), functional capacity changes such as liver frailty index (“LFI”), patient reported outcomes (“PROs”), and biochemical markers including hematocrit for anemia status, albumin, creatinine/kidney function, etc.
| 24 |
Disease Overview – Cirrhosis
There are over 2 million cases of cirrhosis worldwide, with over 500,000 people living with decompensated cirrhosis in the U.S. and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is the most rapidly increasing indication for liver transplant. 62% of those on the liver transplant (“LT”) waitlist are male and the economic burden (approximately $812,500/transplant) is high and continues to increase. Each year about half of the approximately 17,000 people in U.S. on the LT waitlist undergo transplant, while nearly 3,000 patients either die or are removed from the list because they were “too sick to transplant.”
Liver cirrhosis is defined as the histological development of regenerative nodules surrounded by fibrous bands. Cirrhotic patients typically have a years-long silent, asymptomatic phase (compensated cirrhosis) until decreasing liver function and increasing portal pressure move the patient into the symptomatic phase (decompensated cirrhosis). Transition to decompensated cirrhosis is marked by clinical events including ascites, encephalopathy, jaundice, and/or variceal hemorrhage. Decompensated subjects survive on average less than 2 years. Common causes of liver cirrhosis include alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (“NAFLD”), chronic hepatitis B and C, primary biliary cirrhosis (“PBC”), primary sclerosing cholangitis (“PSC”) and cryptogenic.
Common complications in cirrhotic patients may include: compromised liver function, portal hypertension, varices in GI tract with internal bleeding, edema, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, compromised immunity with post-transplant acute rejection risk, high sodium levels, increased bilirubin, low albumin level, insulin resistance with impaired peripheral uptake of glucose, depression, accelerated muscle disorder in the form of sarcopenia, myosteotosis, and frailty with compromised energetics, bone diseases (e.g., osteoporosis), high alkaline phosphatase (“ALP”), cachexia, malnutrition, weight loss (>5%), symptoms of hypogonadism such as abnormal hair distribution, anemia, sexual dysfunction, testicular atrophy, muscle wasting, fatigue, osteoporosis, gynecomastia, inflammation with elevated cytokines, and infection risk leading to hospital admissions and possibly death.
Hepatic encephalopathy (“HE”), a significant decompensation event in patient with cirrhosis, is a brain dysfunction caused by liver insufficiency and/or portal systemic shunting. Because the damaged liver cannot function normally (as in cirrhosis), neurotoxins such as ammonia are inadequately removed from systemic circulation and travel to the brain, where they affect neurotransmission. This can cause episodes of HE, which may present as alterations in consciousness, cognition, and behavior that range from minimal to severe. Overt HE occurs in 30% to 40% of patients with cirrhosis at some point during the clinical course of their disease. As the burden of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis is increasing, the frequency of HE is also increasing.
Muscle Disorders and Cirrhosis
Muscle disorders secondary to cirrhosis could be manifested in the form of several inter-related characteristics such as sarcopenia, myosteatosis, and frailty impacting muscle mass, strength, quality, and function. Chronic inflammation and oxidative stress have also been reported to accelerate muscle wasting. Muscle also plays a significant compensatory role in detoxifying ammonia, a neurotoxin and a myotoxin implicated in precipitation of HE in cirrhosis patients.
Sarcopenia and associated frailty affect up to 70% of cirrhotic men and are a leading cause of patients being removed from the LT waitlist. Due to the lack of available organs and aging demographics of those on the waitlist, patients that do receive a transplant are “increasingly being described as frail”. The presence of sarcopenia or frailty is associated with increased risk of hospitalization and hepatic decompensation, a two-fold increase in waitlist mortality, poor post-transplant outcomes, and reportedly is equivalent to adding 9-10 points to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (“MELD”) score.
Sarcopenia is typically associated with body composition changes with decreased muscle mass and/or low skeletal muscle index. Change in one or more of appendicular lean mass, total lean mass, fat mass, high VAT (visceral adipose tissue), waist circumference, weight, and/or BMI are notable features. Myosteatosis (fat infiltration in muscles) is indicative of poor muscle quality. Frailty is a state of low energetics accompanied with low physical performance/mobility probably because of poor muscle strength/function and is assessed via various measures such as decreased gait speed, weak hand grip; slow rising from a chair, balance, isometric knee extension peak torque or a composite measure such as liver frailty index (“LFI”).
Reportedly, as shown in the figure below, muscle disorder such as sarcopenia and myosteatosis in cirrhosis could be a clinically meaningful predictor of survival and mortality with lower survival in cirrhotic patients with accompanying muscle disorders.
| 25 |
Montano-Loza, J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016 May; 7(2): 126–135
Muscle Disorders and Mortality in Liver Cirrhosis
Sarcopenia develops in the majority of male cirrhosis patients. The main mechanisms associated with sarcopenia and decompensated cirrhosis include a catabolic state, progressive immobility, imbalance between muscle breakdown and formation, and hormonal changes. Patients are typically diagnosed with decompensated cirrhosis upon development of cirrhotic symptoms (e.g., jaundice, HE), and the diagnosis is confirmed via various liver function/imaging tests (e.g., MELD score, liver biopsy, CT scan). A variety of clinical evaluations for muscle mass, strength, and function are typically used to diagnose sarcopenia. Sarcopenia in cirrhosis also correlates with decompensation events, particularly HE (sarcopenia is about 2-fold more prevalent in overt HE patients than those without overt HE). Notably, low testosterone in males is associated with sarcopenia, severity of cirrhosis, and mortality.
| 26 |
Reportedly, as shown in figure below, sarcopenia is a predictor for increased mortality in cirrhosis (about 2-fold higher compared to no sarcopenia).
Tantai et al. J. Hepatol. 2022, 76, 588–599
Reportedly, as shown in figure below, pre transplant sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis often produces poor post-transplant outcomes with higher mortality rates. Longer post-transplant hospitalization and rehabilitation can be demanding on the individual, both physically and financially.
Englesbe et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Aug;211(2):271-8
| 27 |
Myosteatosis in cirrhosis
Myosteatosis, fat infiltration in muscles, has been found in many cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant evaluation, and studies have associated it with more complications and poor survival. Myosteatosis is characteristically associated with liver steatosis in NAFLD, resulting from ectopic fat accumulation in skeletal muscle. Myosteatosis may affect many individuals who do not meet the anthropometric criteria for sarcopenia or obesity. The accumulation of excess fat in extramyocellular compartments is mostly pathologic. It can be defined as intramuscular (between muscle fibers) or intermuscular (between muscle fascicles) and is associated with lower muscle function and strength, muscle atrophy, and physical disabilities.
Frailty and cirrhosis
Frailty is a state of low energetics accompanied with low physical performance/mobility, usually as a result of poor muscle strength/function and its presence is assessed via various measures such as decreased gait speed, weak hand grip, slow rising from a chair, poor balance, low isometric knee extension peak torque or a composite measure such as LFI.
Reportedly, as shown in figure below, frailty predicts LT waitlist mortality among outpatients with cirrhosis regardless of the MELD score.
Lai et al. Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1870-9
The presence of frailty is associated with increased waitlist death/delisting
Moreover, it has also been reported, as shown in figure below, that there is a higher incidence of waitlist mortality as the frailty worsened.
| 28 |
Lai et al. J Hepatol. 2020 Sep;73(3):575-581.
Trajectory of liver frailty and mortality
Currently, there are no FDA approved drugs to treat secondary sarcopenia in cirrhosis. We believe we are the only clinical-stage company pursuing decompensation in sarcopenic cirrhotic patients, and no regulatory precedent currently exists for the approval of decompensation or sarcopenia-targeted therapies. We believe LPCN 1148 has the potential to aid the management of decompensation events in male sarcopenic cirrhotic patients through the following possible mechanisms of action: myo-augmentation (impact muscle mass and/or quality and/or function) via myostatin inhibition, myosteatosis reduction, anti-catabolic effect, changes in body composition (increase lean mass and/or reduce fat mass) and slowing muscle autophagy; inducing hepato-effective actions with improved key liver injury markers; increase protein synthesis; improve anemia, induce immunomodulation with improvement of immuno-dysregulation, and lower infection rates; anti-inflammatory/antioxidant effects by lowering undesirable cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α; and improve mitochondrial function.(1)
| (1) | Ref: Leise. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014.; Hudson. Eur J Gastroenterol. 2019.; Bajaj. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017.; Bohra. World J Gastroenterol. 2020.; Carey, Hepatology, 2019; Sinclair, Ailment Pharmacol Ther, 2016; Lai, Am J Transplant, 2014; Montano-Loza, Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 2015; Kahn, Clin Transp, 2018; Montano-Loza, J Cach, Sarco, and Musc, 2016. |
LPCN 1144: An Oral Prodrug of Bioidentical Testosterone Product Candidate for the Treatment of NASH
We are currently evaluating LPCN 1144, an oral prodrug of bioidentical testosterone comprised of TU, for the treatment of non-cirrhotic NASH.
| 29 |
Disease Overview – NASH
NASH is a more advanced state of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (“NAFLD”) and can progress to a cirrhotic liver or liver failure, require liver transplant, and can result in hepatocellular carcinoma/ liver cancer, and death. Progression of NASH to end stage liver disease will soon surpass all other causes of liver failure requiring liver transplantation. Importantly, beyond these critical conditions, NASH and NAFLD patients additionally suffer heightened cardiovascular risk and, in fact, die more frequently from cardiovascular events than from liver disease. NAFLD/NASH is becoming more common due to its strong correlation with obesity and metabolic syndrome, including components of metabolic syndrome such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure. Twenty to thirty percent of the U.S. population is estimated to suffer from NAFLD and fifteen to twenty percent of this group progress to NASH, which is a substantially large population that lacks effective therapy. NASH is a silent killer that affects millions in the U.S. Diagnoses have been on the rise and are expected to increase dramatically in the next decade. Approximately 50% of NASH patients are in adult males In men, especially with comorbidities associated with NAFLD/NASH, testosterone deficiency has been associated with an increased accumulation of visceral adipose tissue and insulin resistance, which could be factors contributing to NAFLD/NASH. There is currently no approved therapy for the treatment of NASH although there are several drug candidates currently under development with many having clinical failures to date.
The critical pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the development and progression of NASH include reduced ability to handle lipids, increased insulin resistance, injury to hepatocytes and liver fibrosis in response to hepatocyte injury. NASH patients have an excessive accumulation of fat in the liver resulting primarily from a caloric intake above and beyond energy needs. A healthy liver contains less than 5% fat, but a liver in someone with NASH can contain more than 20% fat. This abnormal liver fat contributes to the progression to NASH, a liver necro-inflammatory state that can lead to scarring, also known as fibrosis, and, for some, can progress to cirrhosis and liver failure.
Markers of Liver Cell Death
Alanine aminotransferase (“ALT”) is an enzyme that is produced in liver cells and is naturally found in the blood of healthy individuals. In liver disease, liver cells are damaged and as a consequence, ALT is released into the blood, increasing ALT levels above the normal range. Physicians routinely test blood levels of ALT to monitor the health of a patient’s liver. ALT level is a clinically important biochemical marker of the severity of liver inflammation and ongoing liver disease. Elevated levels of ALT represent general markers of liver cell death and inflammation without regard to any specific mechanism. Aspartate aminotransferase (“AST”) is a second enzyme found in the blood that is produced in the liver and routinely measured by physicians along with ALT. As with ALT, AST is often elevated in liver disease and, like ALT, is considered an overall marker of liver inflammation.
Diagnosis
Most people with NASH are asymptomatic and their disease is often discovered incidentally following a liver imaging procedure, such as an ultrasound, prescribed for other reasons or as part of an investigation for elevated liver enzymes. Once suspected clinically, a liver biopsy is required to definitively diagnose NASH, which necessitates the joint presence of steatosis, ballooning and lobular inflammation. Once pathologically confirmed, the severity of NAFLD and NASH is determined using the histologically validated NAFLD activity score, which grades disease activity on a scale of 0 to 8. The NAFLD activity score is the sum of the individual scores for steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) but does not include a score for fibrosis. Fibrosis staging (F0-F4) relies on the NASH CRN classification (F0 = no fibrosis; F1 = perisinusoidal or portal/periportal fibrosis (not both); F2 = both perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis; F3 = bridging fibrosis; F4 = cirrhosis).
Histological diagnosis remains the gold standard for assessment of NASH and fibrosis. However, given that liver biopsy is associated with risks of pain, bleeding and other morbidity, as well as significant cost, the procedure is not practical for general patient screening. Several non-invasive tools such as clinical risk scores and imaging techniques are increasingly used to assess potential NASH patients. Clinical risk scores such as the NAFLD fibrosis score, Fibrosis-4 index, the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score and vibration-controlled transient elastography (“VCTE”), have been validated and are increasingly used. These tools have an excellent negative predictive value and an acceptable positive predictive value for detection of advanced (≥ F3) fibrosis and are increasingly used in clinical settings. Extensive efforts are also under way to develop non-invasive means to identify patients with NAS ≥ 4 or fibrosis ≥ F2 without a liver biopsy. In draft guidance, the FDA encouraged sponsors to identify biochemical or noninvasive imaging biomarkers that, once characterized and agreed by the FDA, could replace liver biopsies for patient selection and efficacy assessment in clinical trials.
| 30 |
We expect that the validation and subsequent adoption of these new tools will result in an increase in the diagnosis and treatment rates for NASH in the future.
Current Status
We have recently completed the LiFT Phase 2 clinical study in biopsy-confirmed non-cirrhotic NASH subjects. The LiFT clinical study was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multiple-arm study in biopsy-confirmed hypogonadal and eugonadal male NASH subjects with grade F1-F3 fibrosis and a target NAFLD Activity Score ≥ 4 with a 36-week treatment period. The LiFT clinical study enrolled 56 biopsy confirmed NASH male subjects. Subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three arms (Treatment A is a twice daily oral dose of 142 mg testosterone equivalent, Treatment B is a twice daily oral dose of 142 mg testosterone equivalent formulated with 217 mg of d-alpha tocopherol equivalent, and the third arm is twice daily matching placebo).
The primary endpoint of the LiFT clinical study was change in hepatic fat fraction via MRI-PDFF and exploratory liver fat/marker end points post 12 weeks of treatment. Additionally, key secondary endpoints post 36 weeks of treatment included assessment of histological change for NASH resolution and/or fibrosis improvement (biopsy) as well as liver fat data (MRI-PDFF). The LiFT clinical study was not powered to assess statistical significance of any of the secondary endpoints. Other important endpoints included the following: change in liver injury markers, anthropomorphic measurements, lipids, insulin resistance and inflammatory/fibrosis markers; as well as patient reported outcomes.
Treatments with LPCN 1144 post 12 weeks of treatment in the LiFT study resulted in robust liver fat reduction, assessed by MRI-PDFF, and showed improvement of liver injury markers with no observed tolerability issues.
Liver biopsies were performed at baseline (“BL”) and after 36 weeks of treatment (“EOS”). Prespecified biopsy analyses included NASH Clinical Research Network (“CRN”) scoring as well as a continuous paired (“Paired Technique”) and digital technique (“Digital Technique-Fibronest”). All biopsy analyses were performed on the same slides and the reads for the three techniques were done independently. Analysis sets included the NASH Resolution Set (all subjects that have BL and EOS biopsy with NASH at BL [NAS ≥4 with lobular inflammation score ≥ 1 and hepatocyte ballooning score ≥1 at BL] (n=37)), the Biopsy Set (all subjects with baseline and EOS biopsies (n=44)), and the Safety Set (all randomized subjects (n=56)).
Both LPCN 1144 treatment arms met with statistical significance the pre-specified accelerated approval regulatory endpoint of NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis based on NASH CRN scoring. Additionally, both treatment arms showed substantial improvement of the observed NASH activity in steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning.
| 31 |
Key results from the LiFT clinical study are presented in the following tables and figures:
In both treatment arms, substantial reductions in markers of liver injury compared to placebo were observed post four weeks of treatment and were sustained through EOS. Using all available Safety Set data, ALT decreased up to a mean of 23.4 U/L at EOS from all group mean baseline of 51.5 U/L and AST decreased up to a mean of 13.3 U/L at EOS from all group mean baseline of 31.9 U/L.
| 32 |
Positive effects in appendicular lean mass and whole-body fat mass, an indicator of overall tissue quality, based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans, were noted in both LPCN 1144 treatment arms.
Finding on liver injury marker and positive effects on body composition can be seen in the following table:
During the 36 weeks of treatment, LPCN 1144 was well tolerated with an overall safety profile comparable to placebo.
Additionally, subjects were given the option to have access to LPCN 1144 through an open label extension (“OLE”) study. The extension study enabled the collection of additional data on LPCN 1144 for up to a total of 72 weeks of therapy, as well as data for 36 weeks of therapy for those subjects on placebo in the LiFT study. Key results from the OLE study are as follows:
| ● | LPCN 1144 was well tolerated over 72-week exposure with no observed safety signals; | |
| ● | Liver injury markers were reduced and maintained with extended LPCN 1144 treatment; and | |
| ● | Observed liver histology improvements support further development |
In November 2021, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation to LPCN 1144 as a treatment for non-cirrhotic NASH. The Fast Track program is designed to accelerate the development and expedite the review of products, such as LPCN 1144, which are intended to treat serious diseases and for which there is an unmet medical need.
We had a written only response from FDA for a LPCN 1144 Type C meeting with the FDA in January 2022 to discuss the development path forward with LPCN 1144. The FDA acknowledged that the NDA submission of LPCN 1144 would be via 505(b)2 regulatory pathway and agreed that no additional non-clinical studies are needed to support an NDA submission. The FDA recommended to request an end-of-phase 2 (“EOP2”) meeting. The FDA acknowledged that in the LiFT study subjects achieved improvements in key components associated with NASH histopathology after 36-weeks of treatment with LPCN 1144 in adult males and agreed that the proposed multicomponent primary surrogate endpoint is acceptable for seeking approval under the accelerated approval pathway. The FDA also recommended either conducting a separate dose–ranging study prior to phase 3 or evaluating multiple doses in phase 3. The FDA agreed that the proposed primary multicomponent surrogate endpoint, NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis, is acceptable for seeking approval under the accelerated approval pathway and the FDA recommended a phase 3 trial with a study duration of 72 weeks. In July 2022, Lipocine held an End of Phase 2 meeting with FDA for LPCN 1144 in NASH. The FDA recommends Lipocine conduct a phase 2 dose ranging study to identify the optimal dose prior to conducting a pivotal study. The FDA agreed to the proposed unique testosterone ester, testosterone dodecanoate, for future clinical studies.
We are exploring the possibility of partnering LPCN 1144 to a third party, although no partnering agreement has been entered into by the Company. No assurance can be given that any license agreement will be completed, or, if an agreement is completed, that such an agreement would be on terms favorable to us.
| 33 |
LPCN 1111: A Next-Generation Long-Acting Oral Product Candidate for TRT
LPCN 1111: is a next-generation, novel ester prodrug of testosterone comprised of testosterone tridecanoate (“TT”) which uses the proprietary delivery technology to enhance solubility and improve systemic absorption. We completed a Phase 2b dose finding study in hypogonadal men in the third quarter of 2016. The primary objectives of the Phase 2b clinical study were to determine the starting Phase 3 dose of LPCN 1111 along with safety and tolerability of LPCN 1111 and its metabolites following oral administration of single and multiple doses in hypogonadal men. Good dose-response relationship was observed over the tested dose range in the Phase 2b study. Additionally, the target Phase 3 dose met primary and secondary end points. Overall, LPCN 1111 was well tolerated with no drug-related severe or serious adverse events reported in the Phase 2b study.
In February 2018 we had a meeting with the FDA to discuss these pre-clinical results and to discuss the Phase 3 clinical study and path forward for LPCN 1111. Based on the results of the FDA meeting and additional pre-clinical studies conducted after the FDA meeting, we have proposed a Phase 3 protocol for LPCN 1111 and have solicited FDA feedback. Based on initial FDA feedback, we expect the Phase 3 clinical trial design to follow the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (“ICH”) guidelines and we expect the trial will include at least a three-month efficacy treatment period and a one-year safety component for approximately 100 subjects. We are currently seeking further clarification from FDA with respect to the total subject LPCN 1111 exposure information needed for an NDA filing. We continue to refine the Phase 3 protocol and plan to request FDA approval of the protocol once it is finalized. Additionally, the FDA previously requested that a food effect and a phlebotomy study be completed, and that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (“ABPM”) be included as part of the Phase 3 clinical study. We are currently transferring the manufacturing of LPCN 1111 to a third-party contract manufacturer and scaling up the formulation after which we anticipate the next steps in developing LPCN 1111 may be to conduct a food effect/phlebotomy study with LPCN 1111. Under the terms of the Antares License Agreement, Antares has been granted an option to license LPCN 1111, exercisable on or before March 31, 2022, for further development and, should LPCN 1111 receive FDA approval, commercialization. On April 1, 2022, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the License Agreement (the “Amendment”), pursuant to which the License Agreement was amended to extend the deadline by which Antares shall exercise its option to license LPCN 1111 to June 30, 2022. As consideration for the Company agreeing to enter into the Amendment, Antares paid the Company a non-refundable cash fee of $500,000 in April 2022. On June 30, 2022, Antares’ option to license a license for TLANDO XR expired and was not exercised.
We are currently in the process of scaling up the manufacturing process and generation of supplies to enable conduct of pivotal studies for registration. We are exploring the possibility of partnering LPCN 1111 to a third party, although no partnering agreement has been entered into by the Company. No assurance can be given that any license agreement will be completed, or, if an agreement is completed, that such an agreement would be on terms favorable to us.
LPCN 1107: An Oral Product Candidate for the Prevention of Preterm Birth
We believe LPCN 1107 has the potential to become the first oral hydroxyprogesterone caproate (“HPC”) product indicated for the reduction of risk of PTB (delivery less than 37 weeks) in women with singleton pregnancy who have a history of singleton spontaneous PTB. Prevention of PTB is a significant unmet need as approximately 11.7% of all U.S. pregnancies result in PTB, a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity.
Current Status
We have completed a multi-dose PK dose selection study in pregnant women. The objective of the multi-dose PK selection study was to assess HPC blood levels in order to identify the appropriate LPCN 1107 Phase 3 dose. The multi-dose PK dose selection study was an open-label, four-period, four-treatment, randomized, single and multiple dose PK study in pregnant women with three dose levels of LPCN 1107 and the IM HPC (Makena®). The study enrolled 12 healthy pregnant women (average age of 27 years) with a gestational age of approximately 16 to 19 weeks. Subjects received three dose levels of LPCN 1107 (400 mg BID, 600 mg BID, or 800 mg BID) in a randomized, crossover manner during the first three treatment periods and then received five weekly injections of HPC during the fourth treatment period. During each of the LPCN 1107 treatment periods, subjects received a single dose of LPCN 1107 on Day 1 followed by twice daily administration from Day 2 to Day 8. Following completion of the three LPCN 1107 treatment periods and a washout period, all subjects received five weekly injections of HPC. Results from this study demonstrated that average steady state HPC levels (Cavg0-24) were comparable or higher for all three LPCN 1107 doses than for injectable HPC. Additionally, HPC levels as a function of daily dose were linear for the three LPCN 1107 doses. Also, unlike the injectable HPC, steady state exposure was achieved for all three LPCN 1107 doses within seven days.
| 34 |
A traditional PK/PD based Phase 2 clinical study in the intended patient population is not expected to be required prior to entering into Phase 3. Therefore, based on the results of our multi-dose PK study we had an End-of-Phase 2 meeting and subsequent guidance meetings with the FDA to define a pivotal Phase 2b/3 development plan for LPCN 1107. However, these discussions may be updated based on recent developments with Covis’ Makena® as described below. We have completed a food effect study to characterize the dosing regimen for the pivotal study. We plan to submit a pivotal clinical study protocol to the FDA.
We are exploring the possibility of partnering LPCN 1107 to a third party, although no partnering agreement has been entered into by the Company. No assurance can be given that any license agreement will be completed, or, if an agreement is completed, that such an agreement would be on terms favorable to us.
The FDA has granted orphan drug designation to LPCN 1107 based on a major contribution to patient care. Orphan designation qualifies Lipocine for various development incentives, including tax credits for qualified clinical testing, and a waiver of the prescription drug user fee when we file our NDA.
Recent Competition Update
On October 5, 2020, the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (“CDER”) proposed that Makena be withdrawn from the market because the PROLONG trial failed to verify the clinical benefit of Makena and concluded that the available evidence does not show Makena is effective for its approved use.
CDER issued AMAG Pharmaceuticals, the NDA holder at the time, a Notice of Opportunity for Hearing (“NOOH”) to withdraw approval of Makena, for which AMAG Pharmaceuticals responded by requesting a hearing and providing detail on the company’s position, recognizing clinicians’ decade-long use of Makena’s treatment and the public health implications of withdrawing approval. The FDA Commissioner has recently granted Covis a public hearing to be held October 17 through 19, 2022. During this time, Makena and the approved generics of Makena have remained on the market pending a final decision about these products by the FDA.
Currently, Makena and the approved generics of Makena are the only products approved for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth.
The FDA also indicated that it intends to hold a meeting with experts in obstetrics, neonatal care, and clinical trial design to discuss how to facilitate development of effective and safe therapies to treat preterm birth.
Oral Neuroactive Steroids (“NAS”) Programs for CNS Disorders
Some preferred endogenous or naturally occurring NAS present in central nervous system (“CNS”) act as positive allosteric modulators (“PAM”) of the GABAA receptor, the major biological target of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (“GABAA”). To improve oral delivery of these modulators, several synthetic NAS derivatives of endogenous GABAA receptor PAMs, have been developed for therapeutic use in the past few decades.
We believe through utilization of our proprietary technology we may have the ability to enable effective oral delivery of endogenous GABAA receptor PAMs which historically had been challenging to deliver orally as they were deemed to be not orally bioavailable. We believe these endogenous GABAA receptor PAMs provide opportunity as a differentiated NAS for treatment of various CNS disorders via the preferred and convenient oral route. We have conducted Phase 1 PK studies for each of our two lead NAS candidates which have demonstrated promising PK results, safety, and tolerability.
| 35 |
LPCN 1154: Product Candidate for PPD
We are currently evaluating LPCN 1154 comprising an endogenous NAS for PPD. The FDA has cleared the LPCN 1154 investigational new drug (“IND”) application to conduct a phase 2 study in PPD. In addition to completing an oral PK study, we completed a food effect study with LPCN 1154. In the second quarter of 2022, a type C meeting was held with the FDA to discuss PK data and the clinical development path of LPCN 1154, our candidate for postpartum depression (“PPD”). Based on feedback from the meeting, the company plans to initiate a multi-dose proof-of-concept study of LPCN 1154 in the second half of 2022.
PPD
PPD (Postpartum depression), a type of major depressive disorder with onset either during pregnancy or within four weeks of delivery, refers to depression persisting up to 12 months after childbirth. PPD can be clinically segmented by the severity of symptoms and presence of a comorbidity, including epilepsy. Approximately 1 in 9 mothers suffers from PPD in the United States alone; this equates to approximately 500,000 women being affected by PPD annually.
Disease Overview - PPD
| ● | PPD is distinct from the “baby blues,” a condition that up to 70% of all new mother’s experience; “baby blues” tend to be short-lived emotional conditions that do not interfere with daily activities. | |
| ● | Symptoms of PPD include hallmarks of major depression, including, but not limited to, sadness, depressed mood, loss of interest, change in appetite, insomnia, sleeping too much, fatigue, difficulty thinking/concentrating, excessive crying, fear of harming the baby/oneself, and/or thoughts of death or suicide. | |
| ● | During pregnancy, levels of endogenous NAS increase considerably along with levels of progesterone; however, they drop sharply postpartum. It has been hypothesized that the rapid perinatal decrease in circulating levels of endogenous NASs may be involved in the development of PPD. The first and only approved treatment option for PPD is an injectable containing endogenous NAS. | |
| ● | Depression may persist long after child delivery. Additionally, approximately 40% of women relapse in subsequent pregnancies or on other occasions. | |
| ● | Psychiatric comorbidities are common in patients with epilepsy. Patients with epilepsy are at high risk for major depressive disorders and PPD. Reported PPD rates are higher among women with epilepsy than the general population. |
Associated Risk Factors
| ● | Genetic: family history and/or previous experience of depression or other mood disorders | |
| ● | Physiological: rapid changes in sex hormones, stress hormones, and thyroid hormone levels during and after delivery | |
| ● | Environmental: stressful life events, changes in relationships at home and at work, and/or lack of familial support |
Unmet medical need
Approximately, 1 in 9 mothers suffer from PPD in the United States alone, which equates to approximately 500,000 women affected by PPD annually. We believe there is considerable unmet need within women with PPD due to lack of convenient and fast-acting oral therapies. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (“SSRIs”) have been the traditional first-line choice for women with severe PPD requiring weeks for onset of efficacy; therefore, a need for a faster onset of action remains a significant unmet need in treating PPD, especially in women with epilepsy risk wherein psychiatric comorbidity is common and PPD rates are higher than the general population.
Injectable brexanolone (ZulressoTM, Sage Therapeutics) became the first FDA-approved treatment for postpartum depression. However, numerous factors limit the utilization of injectable brexanolone such as method of administration, cost, and safety concerns. Administration of injectable brexanolone requires a 60-hour continuous infusion in a supervised medical setting, a demanding ask for a mother with a newborn. Besides associated privacy concerns and social stigma, hospitalization may also require separation of the mother and child for a few days, which may be difficult to the already strained mother-infant bond and may present breast feeding challenges. Moreover, the pharmacotherapy costs coupled with hospitalization/childcare costs limits its accessibility and affordability to women most in need of the therapy. Finally, due to concerns about the safety of injectable ZulressoTM including excessive sedation or loss of consciousness, Zulresso has a Black Box Warning in its label and is only available through a restricted distribution program (REMS), and sites need significant time to become treatment ready.
We believe LPCN 1154 targets the unmet need for a convenient, oral treatment with faster onset of action.
| 36 |
LPCN 2101: NAS for epilepsy
We are currently evaluating an additional NAS candidate, LPCN 2101, for women with epilepsy (“WWE”). We have completed a pre-clinical study for LPCN 2101 which demonstrated promising PK results, safety and tolerability. In July 2022 our IND was accepted by the FDA for LPCN 2101 for adults with epilepsy and we plan to initiate a Phase 2 IND opening proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LPCN 2101 in the second half of 2022. The Phase 2 study will be a photosensitive epilepsy (“PSE”) study with the first patient expected to be dosed in the second half of 2022. The photosensitivity model enrolls patients who have an EEG-measurable photoparoxysmal response (“PPR”) triggered by light stimulation. Reduction in photosensitivity can be quantified after a single dose of a potential anti-seizure medication (“ASM”). Reportedly, positive results in the PSE model have proven to be a reliable marker of antiseizure efficacy for most approved ASMs.
Disease Overview - Epilepsy
Epilepsy is defined by the 1) occurrence of at least two unprovoked seizures more than 24 hours apart, 2) occurrence of one unprovoked seizure and a probability of further seizures occurring over the next 10 years, and/or 3) diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome. Patients with epilepsy are more likely to be comorbid with other conditions, including depression and anxiety.
Patients with epilepsy have increased risk of mortality due to direct effects of seizures (e.g., status epilepticus, car accidents) and indirect effects of seizures (e.g., suicide, cardiovascular effects.)
Epilepsy is a disorder of the brain that causes seizures, affecting the physical, mental, and social well-being of persons, and is associated with a 2 to 3 times greater mortality rate compared with the general population. About 60-65% of epilepsy is idiopathic and about 30% of patients are refractory (i.e., epilepsy not well managed with currently available ASMs). Epilepsy is the most common neurological disorder during pregnancy.
It is estimated that approximately 900,000 CB age women suffer from active epilepsy in the U.S. Women of CB age with epilepsy face many additional challenges due to hormonal influences on seizure activity and endocrine function throughout the different phases of their reproductive cycles. Elevated estrogen or decreased progesterone levels can exacerbate seizure frequency. Often, these women experience hormonal and endogenous NAS imbalances, coupled with fluctuations in the blood levels of ASMs that impact control of seizures, efficacy of oral contraceptives, any coexisting anxiety and/or depression and any associated sleep impairment. Epileptic patients are 5-20 times more likely to develop depression.
Clinical segmentation can be categorized by epilepsy type, comorbidities and patient subgroups. Categorization of focal epilepsy, generalized epilepsy, combined focal and generalized epilepsy, and unknown epilepsy can guide the choice of ASM. Special patient subgroups, including WWE of CB age and elderly patients, require special care and management of epilepsy. Comorbidities such as depression and anxiety may be co-treated with therapies that do not aggravate seizures and have no drug interaction with the ASM used for epilepsy. While lowest effective dose and monotherapy are preferred, management of patients with epilepsy is focused on controlling seizures, avoiding adverse events, and maintaining quality of life. Despite a wide range of ASMs available, about 30 % of all people with epilepsy still fail to respond to treatment effectively. Women with epilepsy face specific challenges throughout their lifespan because of seizures, ASMs, and hormonal fluctuations.
Women with epilepsy were once counseled to avoid pregnancy, but epilepsy is no longer considered a contraindication to pregnancy. Caregivers for WWE in the preconception phase either intending to start a family (planning pregnancy) or using contraception to prevent an unplanned pregnancy face significant challenges to balance seizure control efficacy with the selection and dosage of ASMs and ASM-related risks such as, among other risks, fetal-neonatal toxicity, contraception failure, and psychiatric side effects.
Several ASMs are known to have teratogenic effects on the developing fetus (converging evidence from registry studies indicates that teratogenic risks are highest with valproate, followed by carbamazepine and topiramate). Other commonly prescribed ASMs, including older generation agents, such as phenobarbital and phenytoin, have been associated with higher risks as compared with lamotrigine, levetiracetam, clonazepam and gabapentin (Vajda et al., 2014; Voinescu and Pennell, 2015). Moreover, risks associated with ASMs is considerable early in pregnancy; therefore, it is necessary that WWE of CB age undergo counselling, monitoring, and adjustment to the most appropriate ASM prior to becoming pregnant. It is preferable WWE of CB age discuss seizure control with their doctor for at least 6 months before conception and, if possible, cease ASM therapy or use the lowest effective dose of a single anticonvulsant according to the type of epilepsy and the fetal toxicity of the ASM. Anxiety, depression, lack of adherence to ASM, and/or contraception failure may be experienced by women who are worried about unplanned pregnancy or are late in confirming pregnancy, planned or unplanned. ASMs can reduce the efficacy of oral contraceptives, compounding this problem.
| 37 |
Complex, multidirectional interactions between female hormones, seizures, and ASMs exist. Most hormones act as NAS and can thus modulate brain excitability. Any changes in endogenous or exogenous hormone levels can affect the occurrence of seizures, either directly or via PK interactions that modify the plasma levels of ASMs (Harden, 2008). The PK interactions between oral contraceptives and ASMs are bidirectional (Johnston and Crawford, 2014). The efficacy of hormonal contraception may be diminished for women taking CYP-P450 enzyme inducing ASMs. Epilepsy is not a medical condition in which contraceptives are contraindicated. Contraceptive failure, possibly related to ASMs, may be responsible for up to one in four unplanned pregnancies in WWE (-12.5% of all WWE pregnancies), vs a rate of 1% in healthy women.
Unmet need to treat WWE in CB age
It is estimated that approximately 900,000 CB age women suffer from active epilepsy in the U.S. Women of CB age with epilepsy face many additional challenges such as hormonal influences on seizure activity and endocrine function throughout the different phases of their reproductive cycles, and approximately 30% of patients with epilepsy cannot be efficiently controlled with available ASMs making consideration of newer pharmacological treatment development options important.
Managing uncontrolled seizures in WWE of CB age is the primary aim during preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum phases. Therefore, uncompromised ASM efficacy with acceptable variability and less or no drug-drug interactions achieved with lowest possible monotherapy dose to address fetal toxicity concerns, remain highly unmet needs. Moreover, control of seizures including prevention of breakthrough seizures is critical when planning for pregnancy and also during pregnancy, as it can also lead to undesired falls or auto-accidents and compromise freedom to drive.
Select ASMs have the potential to induce contraception failures, reproductive hormone imbalance, anxiety, and depression. There remains an unmet need for an ASM without the aforementioned downsides, with no to low fetal-neonatal toxicity and without any breast-feeding concerns as well as potential to treat associated comorbidities.
While over 30 molecules have been approved for the treatment of epilepsy in the U.S., no epilepsy drug has been specifically approved for WWE of CB age. We believe our endogenous NASs as GABAA PAMs, while targeting the goal of seizure control, also have the potential for additional benefits in psychiatric disorders comorbidities (e.g., anxiety and/or depression), and sleep impairment. Moreover, these oral endogenous NAS could potentially address some of the fetal toxicity concerns related to unplanned or planned pregnancy in WWE. (2)
(2) Ref: S.Bangar et al. Functional Neurology 2016; 31(3): 127-134; Reimers et al. Seizure. 2015 May;28:66-70.
Financial Operations Overview
Revenue
To date, we have not generated any revenues from product sales and do not expect to generate revenue other than TLANDO royalties and licensing fees until one of our product candidates receives approval from the FDA. Revenues to date have been generated substantially from license fees, royalty and milestone payments and research support from our licensees. Since our inception through June 30, 2022, we have generated $44.7 million in revenue under our various license and collaboration arrangements and from government grants. Based on the terms of the Antares license agreement, we estimate that we will receive a payment of approximately $235,000 for royalties based on estimated second quarter 2022 net sales of TLANDO. If received, receipt of this payment will reduce our contract asset in the third quarter of 2022. We may never generate revenues from any of our clinical or pre-clinical development programs other than TLANDO as we may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval or commercializing any of these product candidates.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, benefits, stock-based compensation and related personnel costs, fees paid to external service providers such as contract research organizations and contract manufacturing organizations, contractual obligations for clinical development, clinical sites, manufacturing and scale-up for clinical trials, formulation of clinical drug supplies, and expenses associated with regulatory submissions. Research and development expenses also include an allocation of indirect costs, such as those for facilities, office expense, travel, and depreciation of equipment based on the ratio of direct labor hours for research and development personnel to total direct labor hours for all personnel. We expense research and development expenses as incurred. Since our inception, we have spent approximately $133.3 million in research and development expenses through June 30, 2022.
| 38 |
We expect to continue to incur significant costs as we develop our other product candidates, including the ongoing Phase 2 POC study in male cirrhotic subjects with LPCN 1148 and our NAS projects, as well as the clinical development of other pipeline product candidates.
In general, the cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of uncertainties in clinical development, including, among others:
| ● | the number of sites included in the trials; | |
| ● | the length of time required to enroll suitable subjects; | |
| ● | the duration of subject follow-ups; | |
| ● | the length of time required to collect, analyze and report trial results; | |
| ● | the cost, timing and outcome of regulatory review; and | |
| ● | potential changes by the FDA in clinical trial and NDA filing requirements for testosterone replacement therapies. |
A change of outcome for any of these variables with respect to the development of our product development candidates could mean a substantial change in the costs and timing associated with these efforts, could require us to raise additional capital, and may require us to reduce operations.
Given the stage of clinical development and the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the clinical development, manufacturing and regulatory approval process, we are unable to estimate with any certainty the time or cost to complete the development of LPCN 1148, LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, LPCN 1107, LPCN 1154, LPCN 2101 and other product candidates. Clinical development timelines, the probability of success and development costs can differ materially from expectations and results from our clinical trials may not be favorable. If we are successful in progressing LPCN 1148, LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, LPCN 1107, 1148, LPCN 1154, LPCN 2101 or other product candidates into later stage development, we will require additional capital. The amount and timing of our future research and development expenses for these product candidates will depend on the pre-clinical and clinical success of both our current development activities and potential development of new product candidates, as well as ongoing assessments of the commercial potential of such activities.
Summary of Research and Development Expense
We are conducting on-going clinical and regulatory activities with most of our product candidates. Additionally, we incur costs for our other research programs. The following table summarizes our research and development expenses:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| External service provider costs: | ||||||||||||||||
| LPCN 1148 | $ | 988,993 | $ | - | $ | 1,420,163 | $ | - | ||||||||
| LPCN 1154 | 823,599 | 94,642 | 1,077,847 | 102,073 | ||||||||||||
| LPCN 1111 | 32,342 | - | 184,671 | - | ||||||||||||
| LPCN 1144 | 156,967 | 554,042 | 241,516 | 1,317,272 | ||||||||||||
| LPCN 1107 | 82,364 | 54,381 | 124,525 | 55,381 | ||||||||||||
| TLANDO | (35,231 | ) | 22,528 | (35,875 | ) | 109,251 | ||||||||||
| Total external service provider costs | 2,049,034 | 725,593 | 3,012,847 | 1,583,977 | ||||||||||||
| Internal personnel costs | 629,649 | 514,705 | 1,324,370 | 1,084,972 | ||||||||||||
| Other research and development costs | 219,329 | 224,389 | 448,748 | 376,279 | ||||||||||||
| Total research and development | $ | 2,898,012 | $ | 1,464,687 | $ | 4,785,965 | $ | 3,045,228 | ||||||||
| 39 |
We expect research and development expenses to increase in the future as we complete on-going clinical studies, including the Phase 2 POC study in male cirrhotic subjects with LPCN 1148 and our NAS studies, as we conduct future clinical studies, including when and if we conduct Phase 2 clinical studies with our product candidates and Phase 3 clinical studies with LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, and LPCN 1107. However, if we are unable to raise additional capital, we may need to reduce research and development expenses in order to extend our ability to continue as a going concern.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related benefits, including stock-based compensation related to our executive, finance, business development, and marketing analytics. Other general and administrative expenses include rent and utilities, travel expenses, and professional fees for auditing, tax and legal services.
General and administrative expenses also include expenses for the cost of preparing, filling and prosecuting patent applications and maintaining, enforcing and defending intellectual property-related claims, including the patent interference and patent infringement lawsuits against Clarus in 2021.
We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we mature as a public company, including legal and consulting fees, accounting and audit fees, director fees, increased directors’ and officers’ insurance premiums, fees for investor relations services and enhanced business and accounting systems, litigation costs, professional fees and other costs. However, if we are unable to raise additional capital, we may need to reduce general and administrative expenses in order to extend our ability to continue as a going concern.
Other Expense (Income), Net
Other expense (income), net consists primarily of interest income earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities and interest expense incurred on our Loan and Security Agreement, gains on our warrant liability and losses (gains) on the our litigation liability.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022 and 2021
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | Variance | ||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 500,000 | $ | - | $ | 500,000 | ||||||
| Research and development expenses | 2,898,012 | 1,464,687 | 1,433,325 | |||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 1,129,519 | 1,525,592 | (396,073 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest and investment income | (69,877 | ) | (17,344 | ) | 52,533 | |||||||
| Interest expense | 7,568 | 57,428 | (49,860 | ) | ||||||||
| Gain on warrant liability | (583,445 | ) | (221,322 | ) | (362,123 | ) | ||||||
| Loss (gain) on litigation settlement | (250,000 | ) | 4,000,000 | (4,250,000 | ) | |||||||
| 40 |
Revenue
The increase in revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2022 related to a non-refundable cash fee of $500,000 received from Antares for consideration of a 90 day extension to exercise its option to license LPCN 1111. On June 30, 2022, Antares’ option to license TLANDO XR expired and was not exercised.
Research and Development Expenses
The increase in research and development expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2022 was primarily due to a $989,000 increase in contract research organization expense related to the Phase 2 POC study in male cirrhotic subjects with LPCN 1148, a $729,000 increase in costs related to LPCN 1154 clinical studies, a $115,000 increase in personnel expense from recruiting and salaries of additional personnel, and a $60,000 increase in our LPCN 1111 and LPCN 1107 clinical studies. These increases were offset by a $397,000 decrease in contract research organization expense and outside consulting costs related to the completion of our LPCN 1144 LiFT Phase 2 clinical study in NASH subjects, and a $58,000 decrease in costs associated with TLANDO, as well as a $5,000 decrease in other R&D expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses
The decrease in general and administrative expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2022 was due to a $561,000 decrease in legal fees primarily related to the 2021 settlement of the patent infringement lawsuit with Clarus Therapeutics Inc. and the ongoing class action lawsuit defense and a $42,000 decrease in personnel costs due to employee turnover. These decreases were offset by a $82,000 increase in professional fees related to the recruitment of additional directors to our Board, a $55,000 increase related to proxy solicitation services and proxy distribution services, a $23,000 increase in corporate insurance expenses, a $17,000 increase in royalty expense related to the net sales of TLANDO resulting from its commercial launch in June 2022, and a $30,000 increase in other general and administrative expenses.
Interest and Investment Income
The increase in interest and investment income during the three months ended June 30, 2022 was mainly due to higher interest rates in 2022 compared to 2021.
Interest Expense
The decrease in interest expense during the three months ended June 30, 2022 was due to a decrease in interest expense on our Loan and Security Agreement with SVB as a result of lower principal balances on the loan in 2022 as compared with 2021. The SVB loan matured and was paid in full in June of 2022.
| 41 |
Gain on Warrant Liability
We recorded a gain of $583,000 and a gain of $221,000, respectively, on warrant liability during the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 related to the change in the fair value of outstanding common stock warrants issued in the November 2019 Offering. The gain in 2022 was attributable to a decrease in the value of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2022 as compared to March 31, 2022 which was mainly due to a decrease in our stock price. The gain in 2021 was attributable to a decrease in the value of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2021 as compared to March 31, 2021 and was also mainly due to a decrease in our stock price. There were zero common stock warrants from the November 2019 Offering exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The warrants are classified as a liability due to a provision contained within the warrant agreement which allows the warrant holder the option to elect to receive an amount of cash equal to the value of the warrants as determined in accordance with the Black-Scholes option pricing model with certain defined assumptions upon a change of control. The warrant liability will continue to fluctuate in the future based on inputs to the Black-Scholes model including our current stock price, the remaining life of the warrants, the volatility of our stock price, the risk-free interest rate and the number of common stock warrants outstanding.
Litigation Settlement
During the three months ended June 30, 2022, we recorded a gain on the settlement of litigation liability of $250,000 as a result of the April 2022 Amendment to the Global Agreement with Clarus (“Amended Settlement Agreement”). The Amended Settlement Agreement settled the payments due in July 2022 and 2023 for $1,250,000 rather than the $1,500,000 total future payments due under the terms of the Global Agreement agreed to in 2021. Under the terms of the Global Agreement we entered into in 2021, we had agreed to pay Clarus $4.0 million payable as follows: $2.5 million which was paid in July 2021, $1.0 million which was to be paid on July 13, 2022, and $500,000 to be paid on July 13, 2023.
During the three months ended June 30, 2021, we recorded a litigation settlement expense of $4.0 million resulting from the Global Agreement with Clarus which resolved all outstanding claims between the two companies.
No future royalties are owing from either party. On July 15, 2021, the Court dismissed with prejudice the Company’s claims and Clarus’ counterclaims.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 and 2021
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | Variance | ||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 500,000 | $ | - | $ | 500,000 | ||||||
| Research and development expenses | 4,785,965 | 3,045,228 | 1,740,737 | |||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 2,373,205 | 3,059,544 | (686,339 | ) | ||||||||
| Interest and investment income | (111,453 | ) | (27,993 | ) | 83,460 | |||||||
| Interest expense | 27,098 | 126,401 | (99,303 | ) | ||||||||
| Gain on warrant liability | (205,457 | ) | (26,257 | ) | (179,200 | ) | ||||||
| Loss (gain) on litigation settlement | (250,000 | ) | 4,000,000 | (4,250,000 | ) | |||||||
| Income tax expense | 200 | 200 | - | |||||||||
| 42 |
Revenue
The increase in revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2022 related to a non-refundable cash fee of $500,000 received from Antares for consideration of a 90 day extension to exercise its option to license LPCN 1111. On June 30, 2022, Antares’ option to license a license for TLANDO XR expired and was not exercised.
Research and Development Expenses
The increase in research and development expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2022 was due to a $1.4 million increase in contract research organization expense related to the Phase 2 POC study in male cirrhotic subjects with LPCN 1148, a $976,000 increase in costs related to LPCN 1154 clinical studies, a $254,000 increase related to LPCN 1111 scale up activities and a food effect study in LPCN 1107, a $239,000 increase in personnel expense resulting from the recruiting and hiring of additional personnel, and a $72,000 increase in other research and development costs. These increases were offset by a $1.1 million decrease in contract research organization expense and outside consulting costs related to the completion of our LPCN 1144 LiFT Phase 2 clinical study in NASH subjects, and a $145,000 decrease in costs associated with TLANDO.
General and Administrative Expenses
The decrease in general and administrative expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2022 was primarily due to a $1.0 million decrease in legal fees related to the 2021 settlement of the patent infringement lawsuit with Clarus Therapeutics Inc. and the ongoing class action lawsuit defense, a decrease of $63,000 in personnel costs due to employee turnover, and a $41,000 decrease in other general and administrative expenses. These decreases were offset by a $140,000 increase in professional fees related to the recruitment of additional directors to our Board, a $110,000 increase related to proxy solicitation services and proxy distribution services, $97,000 increase in various other consulting fees, a $49,000 increase in corporate insurance expenses, and a $17,0000 increase in royalty expense related to the net sales of TLANDO resulting from its commercial launch in June 2022.
Interest and Investment Income
The increase in interest and investment income during the six months ended June 30, 2022 was due to higher interest rates in 2022 compared to 2021, despite lower cash and marketable investment securities balances.
Interest Expense
The decrease in interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2022 was due to a decrease in interest expense on our Loan and Security Agreement with SVB, mainly as a result of lower principal balances 2022 as compared to 2021. The SVB loan matured and was paid in full in June of 2022.
| 43 |
Gain on Warrant Liability
We recorded a gain of $205,000 and a gain of $26,000, respectively, on warrant liability during the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 related to the change in the fair value of outstanding common stock warrants issued in the November 2019 Offering. The gain in 2022 was attributable to a decrease in the value of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2022 as compared to December 31, 2021 due to a a decrease in our stock price and the shorter term remaining on the outstanding warrants. The gain in 2021 was attributable to a decrease in the value of warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2021 as compared to December 31, 2020 due to a small decrease in the number of warrants outstanding, a decrease in our volatility and the shorter term remaining on the outstanding warrants. There were zero and 10,000 common stock warrants from the November 2019 Offering exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The warrants are classified as a liability due to a provision contained within the warrant agreement which allows the warrant holder the option to elect to receive an amount of cash equal to the value of the warrants as determined in accordance with the Black-Scholes option pricing model with certain defined assumptions upon a change of control. The warrant liability will continue to fluctuate in the future based on inputs to the Black-Scholes model including our current stock price, the remaining life of the warrants, the volatility of our stock price, the risk-free interest rate and the number of common stock warrants outstanding.
Litigation Settlement
During the six months ended June 30, 2022, we recorded a gain on the settlement of litigation liability of $250,000 as a result of the April 2022 Amendment to Global Agreement with Claurus (“Amended Settlement Agreement”). The Amended Settlement Agreement settled the payments due in July 2022 and 2023 for $1,250,000 rather than the $1,500,000 total future payments due under the terms of the Global Agreement agreed to in 2021. Under the terms of the Global Agreement we entered into in 2021, we had agreed to pay Clarus $4.0 million payable as follows: $2.5 million which was paid in July 2021, $1.0 million which was to be paid on July 13, 2022 and $500,000 to be paid on July 13, 2023.
During the six months ended June 30, 2021, we recorded a litigation settlement expense of $4.0 million resulting from the Global Agreement with Clarus which resolved all outstanding claims between the two companies.
No future royalties are owing from either party. On July 15, 2021, the Court dismissed with prejudice the Company’s claims and Clarus’ counterclaims.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception, our operations have been primarily financed through sales of our equity securities, debt and payments received under our license and collaboration arrangements. We have devoted our resources to funding research and development programs, including discovery research, pre-clinical and clinical development activities. We have incurred operating losses in most years since our inception and we expect to continue to incur operating losses into the foreseeable future as we advance the clinical development of LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, LPCN 1148, LPCN 1107, LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101, and any other product candidate, including continued research efforts.
As of June 30, 2022, we had $37.4 million of unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable investment securities compared to $46.6 million at December 31, 2021.
On January 28, 2021, we completed a public offering of securities registered under an effective registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“January 2021 Offering”). The gross proceeds from the January 2021 Offering were approximately $28.7 million, before deducting underwriter fees and other offering expenses of $1.9 million. In the January 2021 Offering, we sold 16,428,571 shares of our common stock.
On January 5, 2018, we entered into the Loan and Security Agreement with SVB pursuant to which SVB agreed to lend us $10.0 million. The principal borrowed under the Loan and Security Agreement bore interest at a rate equal to the Prime Rate, as reported in money rates section of The Wall Street Journal or any successor publication representing the rate of interest per annum then in effect, plus one percent per annum, which interest was payable monthly. Additionally on April 1, 2020, we entered into a Deferral Agreement with SVB. Under the Deferral Agreement, principal repayments were deferred by six months and we were only required to make monthly interest payments during the deferral period. The Loan matured and was paid in full on June 1, 2022. Additionally, we made a final payment at maturity equal to $650,000 (the “Final Payment Charge”) at the time the loan matured. The expense of the final payment charge had been recognized over the term of the facility using the effective interest method.
| 44 |
On March 6, 2017, we entered into the Sales Agreement with Cantor pursuant to which we may issue and sell, from time to time, shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to the amount we have registered on an effective registration statement pursuant to which the offering is being made. We currently have registered up to $50.0 million for sale under the Sales Agreement, pursuant to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-250072), through Cantor as our sales agent. Cantor may sell our common stock by any method permitted by law deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) of the Securities Act, including sales made directly on or through the NASDAQ Capital Market or any other existing trade market for our common stock, in negotiated transactions at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at prices related to prevailing market prices, or any other method permitted by law. Cantor uses its commercially reasonable efforts consistent with its normal trading and sales practices and applicable law and regulations to sell these shares. We pay Cantor 3.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds from each sale of shares under the Sales Agreement. We have also provided Cantor with customary indemnification rights.
The shares of our common stock sold under the Sales Agreement are sold and issued pursuant to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-250072) (the “Form S-3”), which was previously declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the related prospectus and one or more prospectus supplements.
We are not obligated to make any sales of our common stock under the 2020 Sales Agreement. The offering of our common stock pursuant to the 2020 Sales Agreement will terminate upon the termination of the 2020 Sales Agreement as permitted therein. We and Cantor may each terminate the 2020 Sales Agreement at any time upon ten days’ prior notice.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, we did not sell any shares of our common stock pursuant to our current Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-250072). During the six months ended June 30, 2021, we sold 1,811,238 shares of our common stock resulting in net proceeds of approximately $3.4 million under the Sales Agreement which is net of $112,000 in expenses consisting of commissions paid to Cantor in connection with these sales and other offering and accounting costs. As of June 30, 2022, we had $41.2 million available for sale under the Sales Agreement.
We believe that our existing capital resources, together with interest thereon, will be sufficient to meet our projected operating requirements through at least June 30, 2023 which includes an on-going clinical study for LPCN 1148, future clinical studies for LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101, research and development activities and compliance with regulatory requirements. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect if additional activities are performed by us including new clinical studies for LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, LPCN 1107, and NAS including LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101. While we believe we have sufficient liquidity and capital resources to fund our projected operating requirements through at least June 30, 2023, we will need to raise additional capital at some point through the equity or debt markets or through out-licensing activities, either before or after June 30, 2023, to support our operations. If we are unsuccessful in raising additional capital, our ability to continue as a going concern will be limited. Further, our operating plan may change, and we may need additional funds to meet operational needs and capital requirements for product development, regulatory compliance and clinical trial activities sooner than planned. In addition, our capital resources may be consumed more rapidly if we pursue additional clinical studies for LPCN 1144, LPCN 1111, LPCN 1107, and NAS including LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101. Conversely, our capital resources could last longer if we reduce expenses, reduce the number of activities currently contemplated under our operating plan or if we terminate, modify or suspend on-going clinical studies. We can raise capital pursuant to the Sales Agreement when not restricted due to terms of previous financings but may choose not to issue common stock if our market price is too low to justify such sales in our discretion. There are numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and, subject to approval by the FDA, commercialization of our product candidates. There are numerous risks and uncertainties impacting our ability to enter into collaborations with third parties to participate in the development and potential commercialization of our product candidates. We are unable to precisely estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenditures associated with our anticipated or unanticipated clinical studies and ongoing development and pre-commercialization efforts. All of these factors affect our need for additional capital resources. To fund future operations, we will need to ultimately raise additional capital and our requirements will depend on many factors, including the following:
| ● | the scope, rate of progress, results and cost of our clinical studies, pre-clinical testing and other related activities for all of our product candidates, including LPCN 1148, LPCN 1111, LPCN 1144, LPCN 1107 and neuroactive steroids including LPCN 1154 and LPCN 2101; | |
| ● | the cost of manufacturing clinical supplies, and establishing commercial supplies, of our product candidates and any products that we may develop; | |
| ● | the cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, if any; |
| 45 |
| ● | the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing, settlement and other arrangements that we may establish; | |
| ● | the number and characteristics of product candidates that we pursue; | |
| ● | the cost, timing and outcomes of regulatory approvals; | |
| ● | the timing, receipt and amount of sales, profit sharing or royalties, if any, from our potential products; | |
| ● | the cost of preparing, filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; | |
| ● | the extent to which we acquire or invest in businesses, products or technologies, although we currently have no commitments or agreements relating to any of these types of transactions; and | |
| ● | the extent to which we grow significantly in the number of employees or the scope of our operations. |
Funding may not be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. Also, market conditions may prevent us from accessing the debt and equity capital markets, including sales of our common stock through the Sales Agreement. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing when needed, we may have to delay, reduce the scope of or suspend one or more of our clinical studies, research and development programs or, if any of our product candidates receive approval from the FDA, commercialization efforts. We may seek to raise any necessary additional capital through a combination of public or private equity offerings, including the Sales Agreement, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements and other marketing and distribution arrangements. These arrangements may not be available to us or available on terms favorable to us. To the extent that we raise additional capital through marketing and distribution arrangements, other collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we do raise additional capital through public or private equity offerings, the ownership interest of our existing stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences, warrants or other terms that adversely affect our stockholders’ rights or further complicate raising additional capital in the future. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we are unable, for any reason, to raise needed capital, we will have to reduce costs, delay research and development programs, liquidate assets, dispose of rights, commercialize products or product candidates earlier than planned or on less favorable terms than desired or reduce or cease operations.
Sources and Uses of Cash
The following table provides a summary of our cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||
| Cash used in operating activities | $ | (6,931,731 | ) | $ | (6,425,056 | ) | ||
| Cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 11,083,460 | (35,426,211 | ) | |||||
| Cash provided from (used in) financing activities | (2,121,088 | ) | 28,601,598 | |||||
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, net cash used in operating activities was $6.9 million and $6.4 million, respectively.
Net cash used in operating activities during the six months June 30, 2022 and 2021 was primarily attributable to cash outlays to support ongoing operations, including research and development expenses and general and administrative expenses. During 2022, we were performing activities related to our Phase 2 POC study in male cirrhotic subjects with LPCN 1148, PK and food effect studies with LPCN 1154 and LPCN 1107 and manufacturing scale up with LPCN 1111. During 2021, we were performing activities related to the LPCN 1144 LiFT Phase 2 paired biopsy clinical study.
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Investing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2022, net cash provided by investing activities was $11.1 million and during the six months ended June 30, 2021, net cash used in investing activities was $35.4 million.
| 46 |
Net cash provided by investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2022 was primarily the result of the maturity of of marketable investment securities, net. Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2021 was due to the purchase of marketable securities. There were $37,000 in capital expenditures during the six months ended June 30, 2022 and no capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2021.
Net Cash Provided From (Used in) Financing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2022, net cash used in financing activities was $2.1 million and during the six months ended June 30, 2021 net cash provided from financing activities was $28.6 million.
Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2022 was mainly due to loan repayments of $1.7 million and payment of the Final Payment Charge of $650,000 related to the SVB Loan and Security Agreement, offset by net proceeds from stock option exercise of $206,000.
Net cash provided from financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2021 was attributable to the net proceeds from the sale of 16,428,571 shares of common stock pursuant to January 2021 Offering resulting in net proceeds of $26.8 million and $3.4 million in proceeds from the sale of 1,811,238 shares of common stock pursuant to the ATM, offset by $1.7 million in debt principal repayments under the SVB Loan and Security Agreement.
Contractual Commitments and Contingencies
Long-Term Debt Obligations and Interest on Debt
On January 5, 2018, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with SVB pursuant to which SVB agreed to lend us $10.0 million. The principal borrowed under the Loan and Security Agreement bore interest at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus one percent per annum, which interest was payable monthly. The loan matured on June 1, 2022 and the outstanding principal, interest and Final Payment Charge were paid in full.
Purchase Obligations
We enter into contracts and issue purchase orders in the normal course of business with clinical research organizations for clinical trials and clinical and commercial supply manufacturing and with vendors for pre-clinical research studies, research supplies and other services and products for operating purposes. These contracts generally provide for termination on notice and are cancellable obligations.
Operating Leases
In August 2004, we entered into an agreement to lease our facility in Salt Lake City, Utah consisting of office and laboratory space which serves as our corporate headquarters. On January 24, 2022, we modified and extended the lease through February 28, 2023.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements which we have prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing our financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Our estimates are based on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There have been no significant and material changes in our critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2022, as compared to those disclosed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates” in our Form 10-K filed March 9, 2022.
New Accounting Standards
Refer to Note 12, in “Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” for a discussion of accounting standards not yet adopted.
| 47 |
| ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are exposed to various market risks, which include potential losses arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Risk. Our interest rate risk exposure results from our investment portfolio. Our primary objectives in managing our investment portfolio are to preserve principal, maintain proper liquidity to meet operating needs and maximize yields. The securities we hold in our investment portfolio are subject to interest rate risk. At any time, sharp changes in interest rates can affect the fair value of the investment portfolio and its interest earnings. After a review of our marketable investment securities, we believe that in the event of a hypothetical ten percent increase in interest rates, the resulting decrease in fair value of our marketable investment securities would be insignificant to the consolidated financial statements. Currently, we do not hedge these interest rate exposures. We have established policies and procedures to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. We place our investments with high quality issuers and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer and do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We invest in highly liquid, investment-grade securities and money market funds of various issues, types and maturities. These securities are classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component in stockholders’ deficit unless a loss is deemed other than temporary, in which case the loss is recognized in earnings.
| ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” within the meaning of Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures, or Disclosure Controls, are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Our Disclosure Controls include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our Disclosure Controls, which was done under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer. Based on the controls evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of June 30, 2022.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter covered by this report, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
| ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On April 2, 2019, we filed a lawsuit against Clarus in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that Clarus’s JATENZO® product infringes six of Lipocine’s issued U.S. patents: 9,034,858; 9,205,057; 9,480,690; 9,757,390; 6,569,463; and 6,923,988. However, on February 11, 2020, we voluntarily dismissed allegations of patent infringement for expired U.S. Patent Nos. 6,569,463 and 6,923,988 in an effort to streamline the issues and associated costs for dispute. Clarus has answered the complaint and asserted counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity. We answered Clarus’s counterclaims on April 29, 2019. The Court held a scheduling conference on August 15, 2019, a claim construction hearing on February 11, 2020 and a summary judgment hearing on January 15, 2021. In May 2021, the Court granted Clarus’ motion for Summary Judgment, finding the asserted claims of Lipocine’s U.S. patents 9,034,858; 9,205,057; 9,480,690; and 9,757,390 invalid for failure to satisfy the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112. Clarus still had remaining claims before the Court. On July 13, 2021, Clarus and Lipocine entered into a global settlement agreement (“Global Agreement”) which resolved all outstanding claims of this litigation as well as the on-going United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Interference No. 106,128 between the parties. Under the terms of the Global Agreement, Lipocine agreed to pay Clarus $4.0 million payable as follows: $2.5 million immediately, $1.0 million on July 13, 2022 and $500,000 on July 13, 2023. On April 29,2022, the Company agreed to an amendment to Section 3.1 of the Global Agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay Clarus $1,250,000 in May 2022, with no additional payments required thereafter. No future royalties are owing from either party. On July 15, 2021, the Court dismissed with prejudice Lipocine’s claims and Clarus’ counterclaims.
| 48 |
On November 14, 2019, we and certain of our officers were named as defendants in a purported shareholder class action lawsuit, Solomon Abady v. Lipocine Inc. et al., 2:19-cv-00906-PMW, filed in the United District Court for the District of Utah. The complaint alleges that the defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that our filing of the NDA for TLANDO to the FDA contained deficiencies and as a result the defendants’ statements about our business and operations were false and misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis in violation of federal securities laws. The lawsuit seeks certification as a class action (for a purported class of purchasers of the Company’s securities from March 27, 2019 through November 8, 2019), compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. We have insurance that covers claims of this nature. The retention amount payable by us under our policy is $1.25 million. We filed a motion to dismiss this class action lawsuit on July 24, 2020. In response, the plaintiffs filed their response to the motion to dismiss the class action lawsuit on September 22, 2020 and we filed our reply to our motion to dismiss on October 22, 2020. A hearing on the motion to dismiss occurred on January 12, 2022. We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these allegations and have not recorded a liability related to this shareholder class action lawsuit as the outcome is not probable nor can an estimate be made of loss, if any.
On March 13, 2020, we filed U.S. patent application serial number 16/818,779 (“the Lipocine ‘779 Application”) with the United States Patent and Tradmark Office (“USPTO”). On October 16 and November 3, 2020, we filed suggestions for interference with the USPTO requesting that a patent interference be declared between the Lipocine ‘779 Application and US patent application serial number 16/656,178 to Clarus Therapeutics, Inc. (“the Clarus ‘178 Application”). Pursuant to our request, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) at the USPTO declared the interference on January 4, 2021 to ultimately determine, as between us and Clarus, who is entitled to the claimed subject matter. The interference number is 106,128, and we were initially declared Senior Party. A conference call with the PTAB was held on January 25, 2021 to discuss proposed motions. On February 1, 2021, the PTAB issued an order authorizing certain motions and setting the schedule for the preliminary motions phase. On July 13, 2021, we entered into the Global Agreement with Clarus to resolve interference No. 106,128 among other items. On July 26, 2021, the PTAB granted our request for adverse judgment in interference No. 106,128 in accordance with the Global Agreement.
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, consider the risk factors discussed in Part 1, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC on March 9, 2022, risk factors discussed in Item 1A of the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on May 9, 2022 and the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the aforementioned report are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that it currently deems to be not material also may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and or operating results.
The following are the risk factors that have materially changed from our risk factors included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC on March 9, 2022 and from our risk factors included in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 filed with the SEC on May 9, 2022:
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry
We will need to grow our Company, and we may encounter difficulties in managing this growth, which could disrupt our operations.
As of June 30, 2022, we had 15 employees. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Also, our management may need to divert a disproportionate amount of its attention away from our day-to-day activities and devote a substantial amount of time to managing these growth activities. Due to our limited resources, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. This may result in weaknesses in our infrastructure, give rise to operational mistakes, loss of business opportunities, loss of employees and reduced productivity among remaining employees. The physical expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert financial resources from other projects. If our management is unable to effectively manage our future growth, our expenses may increase more than expected, our ability to generate revenue could be reduced and we may not be able to implement our business strategy. Our future financial performance and our ability to commercialize our product candidates and compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively manage any future growth.
| 49 |
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
The value of our warrants outstanding from the November 2019 Offering is subject to potentially material increases and decreases based on fluctuations in the price of our common stock, among other factors.
In November 2019, we completed a public offering of common stock and warrants to purchase common stock (the “November 2019 Offering”). Gross proceeds from the November 2019 Offering were approximately $6.0 million. In the November 2019 Offering, the Company sold (i) 10,450,000 Class A Units, with each Class A Unit consisting of one share of common stock and a common stock warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and (ii) 1,550,000 Class B Units, with each Class B Unit consisting of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of a common stock and one common stock warrant to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.50 per Class A Unit and $0.4999 per Class B Unit. The pre-funded warrants were issued in lieu of common stock in order to ensure the purchaser did not exceed certain beneficial ownership limitations. The pre-funded warrants were immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $.0001 per share, subject to adjustment. Additionally, the common stock warrants were immediately exercisable at an exercise price of $0.50 per share and expire on November 17, 2024.
We account for the common stock warrants as a derivative instrument, and changes in the fair value of the warrants are included under other income (expense) in the Company’s statements of operations for each reporting period. As of June 30, 2022, the aggregate fair value of the warrant liability included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet was $590,000. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the warrants. As a result, the option-pricing model requires the input of several assumptions, including the stock price volatility, share price and risk-free interest rate. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. While the liability may only result from a change of control at that point in time, we ultimately may incur amounts significantly different than the carrying value.
Our management and directors will be able to exert influence over our affairs.
As of June 30, 2022, our executive officers and directors beneficially owned approximately 4.9% of our common stock. These stockholders, if they act together, may be able to influence our management and affairs and all matters requiring stockholder approval, including significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control and might affect the market price of our common stock.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile over the past year and may continue to be volatile.
The market price and trading volume of our common stock has been volatile over the past year and it may continue to be volatile. Over the past year, our common stock has traded as low as $0.73 and as high as $1.85 per share. We cannot predict the price at which our common stock will trade in the future and it may decline. The price at which our common stock trades may fluctuate significantly and may be influenced by many factors, including our financial results; developments generally affecting our industry; general economic, industry and market conditions; the depth and liquidity of the market for our common stock; investor perceptions of our business; reports by industry analysts; announcements by other market participants, including, among others, investors, our competitors, and our customers; regulatory action affecting our business; and the impact of other “Risk Factors” discussed herein and in our Annual Report. In addition, changes in the trading price of our common stock may be inconsistent with our operating results and outlook. The volatility of the market price of our common stock may adversely affect investors’ ability to purchase or sell shares of our common stock.
| 50 |
Nasdaq may delist our securities from its exchange, which could harm our business and limit our stockholders’ liquidity.
Our common stock is currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”), which has qualitative and quantitative listing criteria. However, we cannot assure you that our common stock will continue to be listed on Nasdaq in the future. In order to continue listing our common stock on Nasdaq, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and stock price levels. Generally, we must maintain a minimum amount in stockholders’ equity, a minimum number of holders of our common stock and a minimum bid price.
On June 7, 2022, we received a letter from Nasdaq’s Listing Qualifications Department notifying us that we were not in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), as the minimum bid price for our listed securities was less than $1 for the previous 30 consecutive business days. We have a period of 180 calendar days, or until December 5, 2022, to regain compliance with the rule referred to in this paragraph. To regain compliance, the bid price of our common stock must close at $1 or more for a minimum of ten consecutive business days. The notice has no present impact on the listing of our securities on Nasdaq.
In the event that we do not regain compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules prior to the expiration of the compliance period, we will receive written notification that our securities are subject to delisting. At that time, we may appeal the delisting determination to a hearings panel pursuant to the procedures set forth in the applicable Nasdaq Listing Rules. We intend to actively monitor our bid price and will consider available options to resolve the deficiency and regain compliance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, including considering whether to conduct a reverse stock split.
If Nasdaq delists our common stock from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
| ● | a limited availability of market quotations for our securities; | |
| ● | reduced liquidity for our securities; | |
| ● | a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities; | |
| ● | a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and | |
| ● | a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future. |
The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” If our common stock continues to be listed on NASDAQ, our common stock will be a covered security. Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a particular case.
Risks Relating to Our Financial Position and Capital Requirements
We have incurred significant operating losses in most years since our inception and anticipate that we will incur continued losses for the foreseeable future.
We have focused a significant portion of our efforts on developing TLANDO and more recently on LPCN 1144, LPCN 1148 and LPCN 1154. We have funded our operations to date through sales of our equity securities, debt and payments received under our license and collaboration arrangements. We have incurred losses in most years since our inception. As of June 30, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $178.8 million. Substantially all of our operating losses resulted from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. These losses, combined with expected future losses, have had and will continue to have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ equity and working capital. We expect our research and development expenses to significantly increase in connection with clinical trials associated with LPCN 1148, LPCM 1111, LPCM 1144, LPCN 1107 and NAS, if initiated. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses or when we will become profitable, if at all.
| ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
None.
| ITEM 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
| ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
None.
| ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
| 51 |
| ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS |
| Incorporation By Reference | ||||||||||
| Exhibit Number | Exhibit Description | Form | SEC File No. | Exhibit | Filing Date | |||||
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation | 8-K | 001-36357 | 3.2 | 7/25/2013 | |||||
| 3.2 | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock | 8-K | 001-36357 | 3.1 | 12/1/2015 | |||||
| 3.3 | Certificate of Increase of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 1, 2021). | 8-K | 001-36357 | 3.1 | 11/1/2021 | |||||
| 3.4 | Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Lipocine, Inc. | 8-K | 001-36357 | 3.4 | 06/28/2022 | |||||
| 10.1+ | License Agreement, dated October 14, 2021, by and between Lipocine Inc. and Antares Pharma, Inc. | 10-Q | 001-36357 | 10.1 | 11/10/2021 | |||||
| 10.2+ | First Amendment to License Agreement, dated April 1, 2022, made by and among Lipocine Inc., and Antares Pharma, Inc. | 10-Q | 001-36357 | 10.1 | 5/9/2022 | |||||
| 31.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||||||||
| 31.2* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |||||||||
| 32.1* | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350 (1) | |||||||||
| 32.2* | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. 1350 (1) | |||||||||
| 101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. | |||||||||
| 101.SCH* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |||||||||
| 101.CAL* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |||||||||
| 101.DEF* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |||||||||
| 101.LAB* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document | |||||||||
| 101.PRE* | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |||||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | |||||||||
| + | Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been submitted separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. | |||||||||
| (1) | This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. | |||||||||
| 52 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| Lipocine Inc. | |
| (Registrant) | |
| Dated: August 8, 2022 | /s/ Mahesh V. Patel |
Mahesh V. Patel, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | |
| Dated: August 8, 2022 | /s/ Krista D. Fogarty |
Krista Fogarty, Corporate Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| 53 |