Commitments and Contingencies	6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies Legal and Regulatory Proceedings Our subsidiary HRHH IP was one of a number of defendants (“Defendants”) in an action ("Hard Rock IP Action") commenced by Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc. (“HRCI”) on September 21, 2010 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc. v. Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC, et al. asserting certain failures to comply with the terms and requirements of the intellectual property licensure agreements to which the Company was a party. HRCI also commenced a separate arbitration proceeding before the American Arbitration Association with respect to certain claims, originally brought in the Hard Rock IP Action, that were deemed arbitrable by the judge in that action (“HRCI Arbitration”). The HRCI Arbitration arose from the same underlying facts as the Hard Rock IP Action. On June 13, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of both the Hard Rock IP Action and the HRCI Arbitration (“HRCI Settlement”), and the court entered the order of dismissal of the Hard Rock IP Action on June 13, 2013. The terms of the HRCI Settlement do not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company. S&H Projects (“S&H”) filed a lawsuit against Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (“HRHI”) on December 3, 2010 with regard to the closure of the Wasted Space lounge in October 2010, (“S&H Matter”). On August 12, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of the S&H Matter. The terms of the S&H Matter settlement do not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company. The Company and affiliates Brookfield Real Estate Financial Partners, LLC, Brookfield Financial, LLC - Series B, and Brookfield Asset Management (US), Inc. are currently amongst a number of defendants (“Defendants”) in an action commenced by Mace Management Group, LLC (“Mace) and Mandown, LLC (“Mandown”) on June 12, 2012 in Nevada’s Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada (the “Mace/Mandown Action”). The Mace/Mandown Action relates to investments made by Mace/Mandown in Wasted Space Lounge, Rare 120 restaurant, the Johnny Smalls restaurant and Vanity nightclub (collectively, the “Venues”) at the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Las Vegas. In general, all claims assert that actions taken by Defendants allegedly deprived Mace/Mandown of their initial investment and/or their share of profits from the Venues. The Mace/Mandown Action is in the preliminary stages and management has determined that based on the proceedings to date it does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material effect on our business, or results of operations or financial condition of the Company. Dolce Group Vegas, LLC filed a complaint against the Company, and affiliates Brookfield Asset Management (US), Inc., and Brookfield Financial, LLC - Series B, in Nevada’s Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada on July 13, 2011 (“Dolce Matter”). The plaintiff alleges breach of contract with respect to plaintiff’s contract to develop the “Rare 120” steakhouse concept for Hard Rock Hotel. On July 12, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of the Dolce Matter. The terms of the Dolce Matter settlement do not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company. On July 27, 2012, the Company received notice of a Demand for Arbitration being filed by Monster Beverage Company (“Monster”) against the Company’s subsidiaries HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC and HRHH IP, LLC (together the “HRHH Entities”) before the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service, or JAMS (the “Monster Beverage Action”). Monster executed a Binding Letter of Intent with HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC on November 6, 2009 with an effective date of December 31, 2009 (the "LOI") and a Supplement to The Binding Letter of Intent: Acquisition of Rights in Rehab Recovery Supplement Beverage with HRHH IP, LLC, the intellectual property rights holder dated as of December 31, 2009 (the "Supplement," and together with the LOI and Supplement collectively the “Monster Agreement”). The gravamen of the Monster Beverage Action was a dispute between the HRHH Entities and Monster over rights to the “Rehab” beverage marks and brand. On August 16, 2013, the arbitrator issued a final arbitration award in favor of Monster which is currently pending appeal. Based upon the terms of the final arbitration award, the outcome of the Monster Beverage Action will not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company. We are also subject to a variety of other claims and lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe the outcome of these and the other matters disclosed above will have a material effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. As of June 30, 2012, the Company accrued $3.5 million for all loss contingency matters and our best estimate of reasonably possible losses in excess of the amount accrued is not material to the financial statements.

Commitments and Contingencies

Legal and Regulatory Proceedings

Our subsidiary HRHH IP was one of a number of defendants (“Defendants”) in an action ("Hard Rock IP Action") commenced by Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc. (“HRCI”) on September 21, 2010 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc. v. Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC, et al. asserting certain failures to comply with the terms and requirements of the intellectual property licensure agreements to which the Company was a party. HRCI also commenced a separate arbitration proceeding before the American Arbitration Association with respect to certain claims, originally brought in the Hard Rock IP Action, that were deemed arbitrable by the judge in that action (“HRCI Arbitration”). The HRCI Arbitration arose from the same underlying facts as the Hard Rock IP Action. On June 13, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of both the Hard Rock IP Action and the HRCI Arbitration (“HRCI Settlement”), and the court entered the order of dismissal of the Hard Rock IP Action on June 13, 2013. The terms of the HRCI Settlement do not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

S&H Projects (“S&H”) filed a lawsuit against Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (“HRHI”) on December 3, 2010 with regard to the closure of the Wasted Space lounge in October 2010, (“S&H Matter”). On August 12, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of the S&H Matter. The terms of the S&H Matter settlement do not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

The Company and affiliates Brookfield Real Estate Financial Partners, LLC, Brookfield Financial, LLC - Series B, and Brookfield Asset Management (US), Inc. are currently amongst a number of defendants (“Defendants”) in an action commenced by Mace Management Group, LLC (“Mace) and Mandown, LLC (“Mandown”) on June 12, 2012 in Nevada’s Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada (the “Mace/Mandown Action”). The Mace/Mandown Action relates to investments made by Mace/Mandown in Wasted Space Lounge, Rare 120 restaurant, the Johnny Smalls restaurant and Vanity nightclub (collectively, the “Venues”) at the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Las Vegas. In general, all claims assert that actions taken by Defendants allegedly deprived Mace/Mandown of their initial investment and/or their share of profits from the Venues. The Mace/Mandown Action is in the preliminary stages and management has determined that based on the proceedings to date it does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material effect on our business, or results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

Dolce Group Vegas, LLC filed a complaint against the Company, and affiliates Brookfield Asset Management (US), Inc., and Brookfield Financial, LLC - Series B, in Nevada’s Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada on July 13, 2011 (“Dolce Matter”). The plaintiff alleges breach of contract with respect to plaintiff’s contract to develop the “Rare 120” steakhouse concept for Hard Rock Hotel. On July 12, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of the Dolce Matter. The terms of the Dolce Matter settlement do not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

On July 27, 2012, the Company received notice of a Demand for Arbitration being filed by Monster Beverage Company (“Monster”) against the Company’s subsidiaries HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC and HRHH IP, LLC (together the “HRHH Entities”) before the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service, or JAMS (the “Monster Beverage Action”). Monster executed a Binding Letter of Intent with HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC on November 6, 2009 with an effective date of December 31, 2009 (the "LOI") and a Supplement to The Binding Letter of Intent: Acquisition of Rights in Rehab Recovery Supplement Beverage with HRHH IP, LLC, the intellectual property rights holder dated as of December 31, 2009 (the "Supplement," and together with the LOI and Supplement collectively the “Monster Agreement”). The gravamen of the Monster Beverage Action was a dispute between the HRHH Entities and Monster over rights to the “Rehab” beverage marks and brand. On August 16, 2013, the arbitrator issued a final arbitration award in favor of Monster which is currently pending appeal. Based upon the terms of the final arbitration award, the outcome of the Monster Beverage Action will not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

We are also subject to a variety of other claims and lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe the outcome of these and the other matters disclosed above will have a material effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. As of June 30, 2012, the Company accrued $3.5 million for all loss contingency matters and our best estimate of reasonably possible losses in excess of the amount accrued is not material to the financial statements.