Commitments and Contingencies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2023

Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued which may result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company, or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the

Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims, as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed, unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. There can be no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

On August 21, 2023, a purported Inpixon shareholder filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Inpixon and its directors. Another shareholder filed a substantially similar suit in the same court against the same parties on August 24, 2023. The cases are styled Busby v. Inpixon, Case No. 3:23-cv-04249 (N.D. Cal.) and Panovski v. Inpixon, Case No. 4:23-cv-04330-KAW (N.D. Cal.). Both suits allege that Inpixon filed a purportedly misleading Form S-4 on August 14, 2023 that omits material information regarding the process leading to the XTI transaction as described in Note 22 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the analysis performed by Inpixon’s financial advisor in connection with the merger. The suits assert claims under Section 14(a) and Section 20 of the Securities Exchange Act and seek injunctive relief, damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and other relief. Inpixon has also received demand letters from multiple purported Inpixon shareholders alleging that the Form S-4 omits or misstates material information regarding similar topics as alleged in the lawsuits, as well as material information pertaining to other topics, including information pertaining to the compensation and business or financial relationships of Inpixon’s financial advisor for the proposed transaction. The letters demand that Inpixon make supplemental disclosures to correct the alleged misstatements and omissions. It is possible that Inpixon may be named in additional suits or receive additional demand letters containing similar allegations or asserting additional allegations or claims regarding the XTI business combination.