XML 27 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.25.3
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2025
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the investment. This alternative approach also reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The guidance defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability and those inputs are significant.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.
The determination of where an asset or liability falls in the hierarchy requires significant judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter and depending on various factors, it is possible that an asset or liability may be classified differently from quarter to quarter. However, the Company expects that changes in classifications between levels will be rare.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with those derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of the Company’s derivatives. The Company has determined that its derivative valuations, with the exception of the multi-tenant receivable, net, are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 3 — Multi-Tenant Retail Disposition for additional information on the multi-tenant receivable, net.
The valuation of derivative instruments is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, as well as observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. In addition, credit valuation adjustments are incorporated into the fair values to account for the Company’s potential nonperformance risk and the performance risk of the counterparties.
Real Estate Investments Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
The Company recorded impairments for real estate investments during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 (see Note 4 — Real Estate Investments, Net for additional information on impairment charges recorded by the Company). The impairments were based on the estimated selling prices, less selling costs, of the impaired properties. The carrying value of these impaired real estate investments on the consolidated balance sheet represents their estimated fair value at the time of impairment.
Impaired real estate investments which are held for use are generally classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities (including derivatives that are presented net) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those instruments fall.
(In thousands)Quoted Prices in Active Markets
Level 1
Significant Other Observable Inputs
Level 2
Significant Unobservable Inputs
Level 3
Total
September 30, 2025
Foreign currency forwards, net (GBP & EUR)$— $(5,088)$— $(5,088)
Interest rate swaps, net (USD & EUR)$— $(1,467)$— $(1,467)
Multi-tenant disposition receivable$— $— $55,916 $55,916 
December 31, 2024
Foreign currency forwards, net (GBP & EUR)$— $1,583 $— $1,583 
Interest rate swaps, net (USD,GBP & EUR)$— $(2,831)$— $(2,831)
A review of the fair value hierarchy classification is conducted on a quarterly basis. Changes in the type of inputs may result in a reclassification for certain assets. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and year ended December 31, 2024.
The change in Level 3 assets was as follows for the periods presented:
(In thousands)Three Months Ended September 30, 2025Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025
Beginning balance$90,214 $— 
   Net receivable recorded for the First Closing— 106,714 
   Net receivable recorded for the Second Closing— 5,484 
   Net receivable recorded for the Third Closing— 14,406 
   Net unrealized gain (loss)3,698 (2,452)
   Cash received for open and operating leases(36,132)(58,756)
   Net realized gain (loss) (1)
(1,864)(9,480)
Ending balance$55,916 $55,916 
__________
(1) Realized losses includes write-offs for tenants that are not yet open and operating, or tenants that opened and began operations for which the Company has or have not received cash proceeds. For additional information on the multi-tenant disposition receivable, see Note 3 Multi-Tenant Retail Disposition.
Financial Instruments not Measured at Fair Value
The carrying value of short-term financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, due to/from related parties, prepaid expenses and other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and dividends payable approximates their fair value due to their short-term nature.
As of September 30, 2025, the Company’s mortgage notes payable had a gross carrying value of $1.4 billion and a fair value of $1.1 billion. As of December 31, 2024 the Company’s mortgage notes payable had a gross carrying value of $2.3 billion and a fair value of $2.2 billion. This approach relies on unobservable inputs and therefore is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
As of September 30, 2025, the advances to the Company under the Revolving Credit Facility had a carrying value of $0.7 billion and a fair value of $0.7 billion. As of December 31, 2024, the advances to the Company under the Prior Revolving Credit Facility had a carrying value of $1.4 billion and a fair value of $1.4 billion.
As of September 30, 2025, the 3.75% Senior Notes had a gross carrying value of $500.0 million and a fair value of $485.0 million. As of December 31, 2024, the 3.75% Senior Notes had a gross carrying value of $500.0 million and a fair value of $458.1 million.
As of September 30, 2025, the 4.50% Senior Notes had a gross carrying value of $500.0 million and a fair value of $490.6 million. As of December 31, 2024, the 4.50% Senior Notes had a gross carrying value of $500.0 million and a fair value of $458.8 million.