XML 38 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We have various assets and liabilities that are considered financial instruments. We estimate that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values. We estimate the fair value of our interest and rent receivables using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar receivables would be made to others with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of our mortgage and working capital loans are estimated by using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. We determine the fair value of our senior unsecured notes, using Level 2 inputs such as quotes from securities dealers and market makers. We estimate the fair value of our revolving credit facility and term loans using Level 2 inputs based on the present value of future payments, discounted at a rate which we consider appropriate for such debt.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, are subjective in nature, and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. Settlement of such fair value amounts may not be possible and may not be a prudent management decision. The following table summarizes fair value estimates for our financial instruments (in thousands):

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

 

December 31, 2017

 

Asset (Liability)

 

Book

Value

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Book

Value

 

 

Fair

Value

 

Interest and rent receivables

 

$

25,855

 

 

$

24,942

 

 

$

78,970

 

 

$

78,028

 

Loans(1)

 

 

1,471,520

 

 

 

1,490,758

 

 

 

1,698,471

 

 

 

1,722,101

 

Debt, net

 

 

(4,037,389

)

 

 

(3,947,795

)

 

 

(4,898,667

)

 

 

(5,073,707

)

 

(1)

Excludes loans to Ernest that are recorded at fair value – see below for further details.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our equity interest in Ernest and related loans, which we sold or were repaid in full (other than our mortgage loans) on October 4, 2018, were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as we elected to account for these investments using the fair value option method. We elected to account for these investments at fair value due to the size of the investments and because we believe this method is more reflective of current values. We have not made a similar election for other equity interests or loans existing at December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.

At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the amounts recorded under the fair value option method were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

As of December 31, 2018

 

 

As of December 31, 2017

 

 

Asset Type

Asset (Liability)

 

Fair Value

 

 

Original

Cost

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Original

Cost

 

 

Classification

Mortgage loans

 

$

115,000

 

 

$

115,000

 

 

$

115,000

 

 

$

115,000

 

 

Mortgage loans

Equity investment and other loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

114,554

 

 

 

118,354

 

 

Other loans/other assets

 

 

$

115,000

 

 

$

115,000

 

 

$

229,554

 

 

$

233,354

 

 

 

 

 

Our mortgage and other loans (for 2017 only) with Ernest are recorded at fair value based on Level 2 inputs by discounting the estimated cash flows using the market rates which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and the same remaining maturities. Our equity investment in Ernest was recorded at fair value based on Level 3 inputs, by using a discounted cash flow model, which requires significant estimates of our investee such as projected revenue and expenses and appropriate consideration of the underlying risk profile of the forecasted assumptions associated with the investee. We classified the equity investment as Level 3, as we used certain unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that were significant to the fair value measurement, and the valuation required management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices. For these cash flow models, our observable inputs included use of a capitalization rate, discount rate (which is based on a weighted average cost of capital), and market interest rates, and our unobservable input included an adjustment for a marketability discount (“DLOM”) on our equity investment of 40% at December 31, 2018.

In arriving at the DLOM, we started with a DLOM range based on the results of studies supporting valuation discounts for other transactions or structures without a public market. To select the appropriate DLOM within the range, we then considered many qualitative factors including the percent of control, the nature of the underlying investee’s business along with our rights as an investor pursuant to the operating agreement, the size of investment, expected holding period, number of shareholders, access to capital marketplace, etc.

Because the fair value of Ernest investments noted above was below our original cost, we recognized an unrealized loss during 2018 (before selling our investment) and 2017. We did not recognize any unrealized gains/losses on the Ernest investments in 2016.