XML 40 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS  
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

Goodwill and intangible assets consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2016

 

(In thousands)

    

Weighted
Amortizable
Life (Years)

    

Gross
Carrying
Amount

    

Accumulated
Amortization

    

Net Carrying
Amount

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

$

92,873

 

$

 —

 

$

92,873

 

Finite-lived intangible assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collaboration agreements

 

12

 

$

465,590

 

$

(180,675)

 

$

284,915

 

NanoCrystal technology

 

13

 

 

74,600

 

 

(19,808)

 

 

54,792

 

OCR technologies

 

12

 

 

42,560

 

 

(18,237)

 

 

24,323

 

Total

 

 

 

$

582,750

 

$

(218,720)

 

$

364,030

 

 

Based on the Company’s most recent analysis, amortization of intangible assets included within its condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2016 is expected to be approximately $60.0 million, $60.0 million, $60.0 million, $55.0 million and $50.0 million in the years ending December 31, 2016 through 2020, respectively. Although the Company believes such available information and assumptions are reasonable, given the inherent risks and uncertainties underlying its expectations regarding such future revenues, there is the potential for the Company’s actual results to vary significantly from such expectations. If revenues are projected to change, the related amortization of the intangible assets will change in proportion to the change in revenues.

 

On January 21, 2016, following the Company’s press release regarding its ALKS 5461 development program, the Company’s stock price declined by 44% from the previous day’s closing price, which the Company considered to be an impairment triggering event. To determine if its goodwill was impaired, the Company assessed qualitative factors to determine whether it was necessary to perform the two-step impairment test. Based on the weight of all available evidence, the Company determined that the fair value of its reporting unit more-likely-than-not exceeded its carrying value.