XML 51 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value

NOTE 11. FAIR VALUE

Authoritative accounting literature establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities and defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) as opposed to the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). A fair value measure should reflect the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including the assumptions about the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique, the effect of a restriction on the sale or use of an asset and the risk of non-performance. Required disclosures include stratification of balance sheet amounts measured at fair value based on inputs the Company uses to derive fair value measurements. These stratifications are:

  • Level 1 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets (which include exchanges and over-the-counter markets with sufficient volume),
  • Level 2 valuations, where the valuation is based on quoted market prices for similar instruments traded in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market, and
  • Level 3 valuations, where the valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market, but observable based on Company-specific data. These unobservable assumptions reflect the Company’s own estimates for assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques typically include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques, but may also include the use of market prices of assets or liabilities that are not directly comparable to the subject asset or liability.

The Company’s RMBS and interest rate swaptions are valued using Level 2 valuations, and such valuations currently are determined by the Company based on the average of third-party broker quotes and/or by independent pricing sources when available. Because the price estimates may vary, the Company must make certain judgments and assumptions about the appropriate price to use to calculate the fair values. Alternatively, the Company could opt to have the value of all of our positions in RMBS and interest rate swaptions determined by either an independent third-party or do so internally.

RMBS, interest rate swaptions and Eurodollar futures contracts were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. When determining fair value measurements, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset. When possible, the Company looks to active and observable markets to price identical assets. When identical assets are not traded in active markets, the Company looks to market observable data for similar assets.

The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

(in thousands)
Quoted Prices
in ActiveSignificant
Markets forOtherSignificant
Identical ObservableUnobservable
Fair ValueAssetsInputsInputs
Measurements(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)
March 31, 2014
Mortgage-backed securities$ 747,758$ -$ 747,758$ -
Eurodollar futures contracts 3,513 3,513 - -
Payer swaption 1,549 - 1,549 -
December 31, 2013
Mortgage-backed securities$ 351,223$ -$ 351,223$ -
Eurodollar futures contracts 2,446 2,446 - -

During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between levels 1, 2 or 3.