XML 34 R2.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.1.u1
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
2 Months Ended 4 Months Ended 8 Months Ended 10 Months Ended 12 Months Ended
Feb. 18, 2020
Dec. 31, 2022
Aug. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2020
Dec. 31, 2023
Dec. 31, 2022
Dec. 31, 2021
Dec. 31, 2020
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table        
Pay vs. Performance
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance measures of the Company. In accordance with applicable SEC rules, the adjustments described and quantified below were made to the values reported in the Summary Compensation table for each applicable year to determine the “actual” compensation paid to our Principal Executive Officers (“PEOs”) and the average “actual” compensation paid to our other Named Executive Officers (or “NEOs”). For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
The following table summarizes compensation values reported in the Summary Compensation Table for our PEO and the average for our other NEOs, as compared to “compensation actually paid” or “CAP” and the Company’s financial performance for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020:
Year
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Artur
Bergman(1)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Artur
Bergman(1)(2)
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Joshua
Bixby(1)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Joshua
Bixby(1)(2)
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO (Todd
Nightingale)(1)
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Todd
Nightingale(1)(2)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO
NEOs(3)
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
NEOs(3)(4)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
Net
Income
(millions)
Revenue
(millions)(6)
Total
Shareholder
Return
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return(5)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(b)
(c)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
2023
$10,165,468
$36,942,933
$6,867,702
$12,229,373
$88.69
$210.85
$(133.1)
$506.0
2022
$9,199,127
$(3,892,017)
$21,857,756
$20,179,714
$4,066,505
$(2,381,573)
$40.81
$134.82
$(190.8)
$432.7
2021
$10,151,111
$(12,802,716)
$7,088,904
$(1,602,130)
$176.63
$189.64
$(222.7)
$354.3
2020
$6,767,258
$38,184,386
$8,049,162
$52,180,083
$3,816,864
$19,287,475
$435.33
$142.21
$(95.9)
$290.9
(1)
The dollar amounts reported in columns (b) are the amounts reported for Messrs. Bergman, Bixby and Nightingale, respectively, for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Bergman served as our Chief Executive Officer in 2020 through February 18, 2020, after which time he became our Chief Architect and Executive Chairperson. Mr. Bergman resigned from his role as Executive Chairperson effective April 2023. Mr. Bergman became our Chief Technology Officer in April 2024. Mr. Bixby served as our Chief Executive Officer effective February 19, 2020 through August 31, 2022. Mr. Nightingale has served as our CEO since September 1, 2022. The following individuals served as our PEOs for the following years:
2023: Todd Nightingale
2022: Joshua Bixby, Todd Nightingale
2021: Joshua Bixby
2020: Artur Bergman, Joshua Bixby
(2)
The dollar amounts reported in columns (c) represent the amount of CAP for Messrs. Bergman, Bixby, and Nightingale, respectively as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid during the applicable year. The Company deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table total compensation the following amounts to calculate compensation actually paid in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K as disclosed in columns (c) and (e) for our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in each respective year. As the Company’s NEOs do not participate in any defined benefit plans, no adjustments were required to amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table totals related to the value of benefits under such plans. There are no material differences between the assumptions used to compute the valuation of the equity awards for calculating the compensation actually paid from the assumptions used to compute the valuation of such equity awards as of the grant date.
 
2023
2022
2021
2020
 
Todd
Nightingale
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Todd
Nightingale
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Artur
Bergman
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Total Compensation from Summary Compensation Table
$10,165,468
$6,867,702
$21,857,756
$9,199,127
$4,066,505
$10,151,111
$7,088,904
$8,049,162
$6,767,258
$3,816,864
Adjustments for Equity Awards
Grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table
-$8,978,088
-$6,160,954
-$20,514,116
-$8,693,058
-$3,413,192
-$9,618,134
-$6,566,179
-$7,630,888
-$6,139,403
-$3,108,033
Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year
$12,012,366
$8,733,232
$17,440,430
$2,475,829
$1,422,184
$3,480,020
$3,051,217
$17,168,729
$12,525,014
$7,009,724
 
2023
2022
2021
2020
 
Todd
Nightingale
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Todd
Nightingale
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Artur
Bergman
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years
$15,809,027
$1,261,639
$0
-$2,985,352
-$2,504,587
-$12,631,447
-$3,455,201
$22,005,767
$14,014,350
$5,408,818
Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in current year
$897,541
$832,627
$1,395,644
$445,932
$303,043
$793,071
$596,255
$6,473,673
$5,520,156
$3,978,822
Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years
$7,036,619
$1,270,861
$0
-$2,664,091
-$1,221,449
-$4,977,337
-$2,317,126
$6,113,639
$5,497,011
$2,181,281
Forfeitures during current year equal to prior year-end fair value
$0
-$575,734
$0
-$1,670,404
-$1,034,077
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in the total compensation
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Adjustments for Equity Awards
$35,755,553
$11,522,625
$18,836,074
-$4,398,086
-$3,034,886
-$13,335,693
-$2,124,855
$51,761,809
$37,556,531
$18,578,644
Compensation Actually Paid (as calculated)
$36,942,933
$12,229,373
$20,179,714
-$3,892,017
-$2,381,573
-$12,802,716
-$1,602,130
$52,180,083
$38,184,386
$19,287,475
(3)
The dollar amounts reported in column (d) represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding our PEOs) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table Total in each applicable year. The following individuals were our Non-PEO NEOs in the respective years:
2023: Artur Bergman, Ronald Kisling, and Brett Shirk
2022: Artur Bergman, Ronald Kisling, Paul Luongo, and Brett Shirk
2021: Artur Bergman, Adriel Lares, Ron Kisling, Paul Luongo, and Brett Shirk
2020: Adriel Lares, Paul Luongo, and Wolfgang Maasberg
(4)
The dollar amounts reported in column (e) represent the average amount of CAP to the non-PEO NEOs as a group, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned by or paid to the Non-PEO NEOs as a group during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, adjustments were made to average total reported compensation for the Non-PEO NEOs as a group for each year to determine the CAP, using the methodology described above in Note 2.
(5)
The peer group is the following published industry index: S&P 500 Information Technology Index.
(6)
While the Company uses numerous financial and non-financial performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance for the Company’s compensation programs, the Company has determined that Revenue is the financial performance measure that, in the Company’s assessment, represents the most important performance measure (that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the table) used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to Company performance.
     
Company Selected Measure Name         Revenue      
Named Executive Officers, Footnote        
(1)
The dollar amounts reported in columns (b) are the amounts reported for Messrs. Bergman, Bixby and Nightingale, respectively, for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Mr. Bergman served as our Chief Executive Officer in 2020 through February 18, 2020, after which time he became our Chief Architect and Executive Chairperson. Mr. Bergman resigned from his role as Executive Chairperson effective April 2023. Mr. Bergman became our Chief Technology Officer in April 2024. Mr. Bixby served as our Chief Executive Officer effective February 19, 2020 through August 31, 2022. Mr. Nightingale has served as our CEO since September 1, 2022. The following individuals served as our PEOs for the following years:
2023: Todd Nightingale
2022: Joshua Bixby, Todd Nightingale
2021: Joshua Bixby
2020: Artur Bergman, Joshua Bixby
(3)
The dollar amounts reported in column (d) represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding our PEOs) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table Total in each applicable year. The following individuals were our Non-PEO NEOs in the respective years:
2023: Artur Bergman, Ronald Kisling, and Brett Shirk
2022: Artur Bergman, Ronald Kisling, Paul Luongo, and Brett Shirk
2021: Artur Bergman, Adriel Lares, Ron Kisling, Paul Luongo, and Brett Shirk
2020: Adriel Lares, Paul Luongo, and Wolfgang Maasberg
     
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote        
(5)
The peer group is the following published industry index: S&P 500 Information Technology Index.
     
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote        
(2)
The dollar amounts reported in columns (c) represent the amount of CAP for Messrs. Bergman, Bixby, and Nightingale, respectively as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid during the applicable year. The Company deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table total compensation the following amounts to calculate compensation actually paid in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K as disclosed in columns (c) and (e) for our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in each respective year. As the Company’s NEOs do not participate in any defined benefit plans, no adjustments were required to amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table totals related to the value of benefits under such plans. There are no material differences between the assumptions used to compute the valuation of the equity awards for calculating the compensation actually paid from the assumptions used to compute the valuation of such equity awards as of the grant date.
 
2023
2022
2021
2020
 
Todd
Nightingale
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Todd
Nightingale
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Artur
Bergman
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Total Compensation from Summary Compensation Table
$10,165,468
$6,867,702
$21,857,756
$9,199,127
$4,066,505
$10,151,111
$7,088,904
$8,049,162
$6,767,258
$3,816,864
Adjustments for Equity Awards
Grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table
-$8,978,088
-$6,160,954
-$20,514,116
-$8,693,058
-$3,413,192
-$9,618,134
-$6,566,179
-$7,630,888
-$6,139,403
-$3,108,033
Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year
$12,012,366
$8,733,232
$17,440,430
$2,475,829
$1,422,184
$3,480,020
$3,051,217
$17,168,729
$12,525,014
$7,009,724
 
2023
2022
2021
2020
 
Todd
Nightingale
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Todd
Nightingale
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Artur
Bergman
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years
$15,809,027
$1,261,639
$0
-$2,985,352
-$2,504,587
-$12,631,447
-$3,455,201
$22,005,767
$14,014,350
$5,408,818
Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in current year
$897,541
$832,627
$1,395,644
$445,932
$303,043
$793,071
$596,255
$6,473,673
$5,520,156
$3,978,822
Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years
$7,036,619
$1,270,861
$0
-$2,664,091
-$1,221,449
-$4,977,337
-$2,317,126
$6,113,639
$5,497,011
$2,181,281
Forfeitures during current year equal to prior year-end fair value
$0
-$575,734
$0
-$1,670,404
-$1,034,077
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in the total compensation
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Adjustments for Equity Awards
$35,755,553
$11,522,625
$18,836,074
-$4,398,086
-$3,034,886
-$13,335,693
-$2,124,855
$51,761,809
$37,556,531
$18,578,644
Compensation Actually Paid (as calculated)
$36,942,933
$12,229,373
$20,179,714
-$3,892,017
-$2,381,573
-$12,802,716
-$1,602,130
$52,180,083
$38,184,386
$19,287,475
     
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount         $ 6,867,702 $ 4,066,505 $ 7,088,904 $ 3,816,864
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount         $ 12,229,373 (2,381,573) (1,602,130) 19,287,475
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote        
(2)
The dollar amounts reported in columns (c) represent the amount of CAP for Messrs. Bergman, Bixby, and Nightingale, respectively as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid during the applicable year. The Company deducted from and added to the Summary Compensation Table total compensation the following amounts to calculate compensation actually paid in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K as disclosed in columns (c) and (e) for our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs in each respective year. As the Company’s NEOs do not participate in any defined benefit plans, no adjustments were required to amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table totals related to the value of benefits under such plans. There are no material differences between the assumptions used to compute the valuation of the equity awards for calculating the compensation actually paid from the assumptions used to compute the valuation of such equity awards as of the grant date.
 
2023
2022
2021
2020
 
Todd
Nightingale
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Todd
Nightingale
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Artur
Bergman
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Total Compensation from Summary Compensation Table
$10,165,468
$6,867,702
$21,857,756
$9,199,127
$4,066,505
$10,151,111
$7,088,904
$8,049,162
$6,767,258
$3,816,864
Adjustments for Equity Awards
Grant date values in the Summary Compensation Table
-$8,978,088
-$6,160,954
-$20,514,116
-$8,693,058
-$3,413,192
-$9,618,134
-$6,566,179
-$7,630,888
-$6,139,403
-$3,108,033
Year-end fair value of unvested awards granted in the current year
$12,012,366
$8,733,232
$17,440,430
$2,475,829
$1,422,184
$3,480,020
$3,051,217
$17,168,729
$12,525,014
$7,009,724
 
2023
2022
2021
2020
 
Todd
Nightingale
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Todd
Nightingale
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Joshua
Bixby
Artur
Bergman
Average
Non-PEO
NEOs
Year-over-year difference of year-end fair values for unvested awards granted in prior years
$15,809,027
$1,261,639
$0
-$2,985,352
-$2,504,587
-$12,631,447
-$3,455,201
$22,005,767
$14,014,350
$5,408,818
Fair values at vest date for awards granted and vested in current year
$897,541
$832,627
$1,395,644
$445,932
$303,043
$793,071
$596,255
$6,473,673
$5,520,156
$3,978,822
Difference in fair values between prior year-end fair values and vest date fair values for awards granted in prior years
$7,036,619
$1,270,861
$0
-$2,664,091
-$1,221,449
-$4,977,337
-$2,317,126
$6,113,639
$5,497,011
$2,181,281
Forfeitures during current year equal to prior year-end fair value
$0
-$575,734
$0
-$1,670,404
-$1,034,077
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Dividends or dividend equivalents not otherwise included in the total compensation
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Adjustments for Equity Awards
$35,755,553
$11,522,625
$18,836,074
-$4,398,086
-$3,034,886
-$13,335,693
-$2,124,855
$51,761,809
$37,556,531
$18,578,644
Compensation Actually Paid (as calculated)
$36,942,933
$12,229,373
$20,179,714
-$3,892,017
-$2,381,573
-$12,802,716
-$1,602,130
$52,180,083
$38,184,386
$19,287,475
     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return        
Required Disclosure of the Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Financial Performance Measures
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following graphs to illustrate the relationship between the CAP and performance figures that are included in the pay versus performance tabular disclosure above. In addition, the first graph below further illustrates the relationship between Company total shareholder return and that of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. As noted above, CAP for purposes of the tabular disclosure and the following graphs were calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not fully represent the actual final amount of compensation earned by or actually paid to our NEOs during the applicable years.
CAP and Cumulative TSR / Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group

     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income        
Required Disclosure of the Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Financial Performance Measures
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following graphs to illustrate the relationship between the CAP and performance figures that are included in the pay versus performance tabular disclosure above. In addition, the first graph below further illustrates the relationship between Company total shareholder return and that of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. As noted above, CAP for purposes of the tabular disclosure and the following graphs were calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not fully represent the actual final amount of compensation earned by or actually paid to our NEOs during the applicable years.
CAP and Net Income

     
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure        
Required Disclosure of the Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Financial Performance Measures
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following graphs to illustrate the relationship between the CAP and performance figures that are included in the pay versus performance tabular disclosure above. In addition, the first graph below further illustrates the relationship between Company total shareholder return and that of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. As noted above, CAP for purposes of the tabular disclosure and the following graphs were calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not fully represent the actual final amount of compensation earned by or actually paid to our NEOs during the applicable years.
CAP and Revenue

     
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group        
Required Disclosure of the Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Financial Performance Measures
As required by Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following graphs to illustrate the relationship between the CAP and performance figures that are included in the pay versus performance tabular disclosure above. In addition, the first graph below further illustrates the relationship between Company total shareholder return and that of the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. As noted above, CAP for purposes of the tabular disclosure and the following graphs were calculated in accordance with SEC rules and do not fully represent the actual final amount of compensation earned by or actually paid to our NEOs during the applicable years.
CAP and Cumulative TSR / Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group

     
Tabular List, Table        
Tabular List for 2023 Fiscal Year
As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. The metrics that the Company uses for both our long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our stockholders. The three financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows:
Revenue
Non-GAAP Operating Loss(1)
Stock Price
(1)
Please refer to Appendix A of this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to their corresponding U.S. GAAP measures.
     
Total Shareholder Return Amount         $ 88.69 40.81 176.63 435.33
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount         210.85 134.82 189.64 142.21
Net Income (Loss)         $ (133,100,000) $ (190,800,000) $ (222,700,000) $ (95,900,000)
Company Selected Measure Amount         506,000,000 432,700,000 354,300,000 290,900,000
PEO Name Artur Bergman Todd Nightingale Joshua Bixby Joshua Bixby Todd Nightingale   Joshua Bixby  
Additional 402(v) Disclosure        
All information provided above under the “Item 402(v) Pay Versus Performance” heading will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such information by reference.
     
Measure:: 1                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Name         Revenue      
Measure:: 2                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Name         Non-GAAP Operating Loss      
Non-GAAP Measure Description        
(1)
Please refer to Appendix A of this Proxy Statement for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to their corresponding U.S. GAAP measures.
     
Measure:: 3                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Name         Stock Price      
Artur Bergman [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
PEO Total Compensation Amount         $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6,767,258
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount         0 0 0 38,184,386
Joshua Bixby [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
PEO Total Compensation Amount         0 9,199,127 10,151,111 8,049,162
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount         0 (3,892,017) (12,802,716) 52,180,083
Todd Nightingale [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
PEO Total Compensation Amount         10,165,468 21,857,756 0 0
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount         36,942,933 20,179,714 0 0
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               37,556,531
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member] | Grant Date Values in the Summary Compensation Table [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               (6,139,403)
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Unvested Awards Granted in the Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               12,525,014
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member] | Year-Over-Year Difference of Year-End Fair Values for Unvested Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               14,014,350
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member] | Fair Values at Vest Date for Awards Granted and Vested in Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               5,520,156
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member] | Difference in Fair Values Between Prior Year-End Fair Values and Vest Date Fair Values for Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               5,497,011
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member] | Forfeitures During Current Year Equal to Prior Year-End Fair Value [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               0
PEO | Artur Bergman [Member] | Dividends or Dividend Equivalents not Otherwise Included in the Total Compensation [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount               0
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           (4,398,086) (13,335,693) 51,761,809
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member] | Grant Date Values in the Summary Compensation Table [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           (8,693,058) (9,618,134) (7,630,888)
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Unvested Awards Granted in the Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           2,475,829 3,480,020 17,168,729
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member] | Year-Over-Year Difference of Year-End Fair Values for Unvested Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           (2,985,352) (12,631,447) 22,005,767
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member] | Fair Values at Vest Date for Awards Granted and Vested in Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           445,932 793,071 6,473,673
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member] | Difference in Fair Values Between Prior Year-End Fair Values and Vest Date Fair Values for Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           (2,664,091) (4,977,337) 6,113,639
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member] | Forfeitures During Current Year Equal to Prior Year-End Fair Value [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           (1,670,404) 0 0
PEO | Joshua Bixby [Member] | Dividends or Dividend Equivalents not Otherwise Included in the Total Compensation [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount           0 0 0
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         35,755,553 18,836,074    
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member] | Grant Date Values in the Summary Compensation Table [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         (8,978,088) (20,514,116)    
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member] | Year-End Fair Value of Unvested Awards Granted in the Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         12,012,366 17,440,430    
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member] | Year-Over-Year Difference of Year-End Fair Values for Unvested Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         15,809,027 0    
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member] | Fair Values at Vest Date for Awards Granted and Vested in Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         897,541 1,395,644    
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member] | Difference in Fair Values Between Prior Year-End Fair Values and Vest Date Fair Values for Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         7,036,619 0    
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member] | Forfeitures During Current Year Equal to Prior Year-End Fair Value [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         0 0    
PEO | Todd Nightingale [Member] | Dividends or Dividend Equivalents not Otherwise Included in the Total Compensation [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         0 0    
Non-PEO NEO                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         11,522,625 (3,034,886) (2,124,855) 18,578,644
Non-PEO NEO | Grant Date Values in the Summary Compensation Table [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         (6,160,954) (3,413,192) (6,566,179) (3,108,033)
Non-PEO NEO | Year-End Fair Value of Unvested Awards Granted in the Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         8,733,232 1,422,184 3,051,217 7,009,724
Non-PEO NEO | Year-Over-Year Difference of Year-End Fair Values for Unvested Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         1,261,639 (2,504,587) (3,455,201) 5,408,818
Non-PEO NEO | Fair Values at Vest Date for Awards Granted and Vested in Current Year [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         832,627 303,043 596,255 3,978,822
Non-PEO NEO | Difference in Fair Values Between Prior Year-End Fair Values and Vest Date Fair Values for Awards Granted in Prior Years [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         1,270,861 (1,221,449) (2,317,126) 2,181,281
Non-PEO NEO | Forfeitures During Current Year Equal to Prior Year-End Fair Value [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         (575,734) (1,034,077) 0 0
Non-PEO NEO | Dividends or Dividend Equivalents not Otherwise Included in the Total Compensation [Member]                
Pay vs Performance Disclosure                
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount         $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0