Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease Commitments

The Company leases its facilities under non-cancelable lease agreements. Certain of these arrangements have free rent, escalating rent payment provisions and tenant allowances. Under such arrangements the Company recognizes rent expense on a straight line basis over the non-cancelable lease term and records the difference between cash rent payments and the recognition of rent expense as a deferred rent liability within other current liabilities (current portion) and other liabilities (non-current portion).

In March 2012, the Company entered into an amended lease agreement related to its San Francisco, California office space. The amendment, which took effect on May 1, 2013, increased the rentable space to approximately 67,000 total square feet and extended the term through October 2019. The monthly base rent payments pursuant to this lease are approximately $0.3 million per month, increasing to approximately $0.4 million per month over the life of the lease.

In October 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to sublease a portion of its San Francisco, California office space. This sublease took effect on February 1, 2014 for a 36-month term through January 2017. The Company received income from this sublease of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Rent expense related to non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease income, was $3.5 million, $3.5 million and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

As of December 31, 2014, the future minimum lease payments required under non-cancelable operating leases and the future minimum payments to be received from non-cancelable subleases were as follows:



2015	$	4,284
2016	4,269
2017	4,206
2018	4,273
2019	3,613
Future non-cancelable minimum operating lease payments	20,645
Less: minimum payments to be received from non-cancelable subleases	(1,499		)
Total future non-cancelable minimum operating lease payments, net	$	19,146

Litigation

From time to time, the Company may be a party to various litigation claims in the normal course of business. Legal fees and other costs associated with such actions are expensed as incurred. The Company assesses, in conjunction with its legal counsel, the need to record a liability for litigation or contingencies. A liability is recorded when and if it is determined that such a liability for litigation or contingencies is both probable and reasonably estimable. No liability for legal contingencies was recorded as of December 31, 2014 or 2013.

In June 2013, Kevin O’Halloran, as Trustee of the Liquidating Trust of Teltronics, Inc. (the “Debtor”), filed a complaint in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida against the Company and Harris Corporation (the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges that the Defendants are liable under federal and state bankruptcy law regarding fraudulent transfers for the value of a patent portfolio purchased by the Company from Harris Corporation pursuant to an agreement entered into in January 2009, and within four years of the date the Debtor filed its petition in bankruptcy. The Company is not currently able to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred, nor can it estimate the potential loss or range of the potential loss that may result from this litigation.

In March 2012, Cascades Computer Innovations LLC filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (the “Court”) against the Company and five of its clients (collectively the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges that the Defendants violated federal antitrust law, California antitrust law and California unfair competition law. The complaint further alleges that after we terminated our negotiations with the plaintiff to license certain patents held by the plaintiff, the Defendants violated the law by jointly refusing to negotiate or accept licenses under the plaintiff’s patents. The plaintiff seeks unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. In January 2013, the Court dismissed the complaint against the Defendants and granted the plaintiff leave to amend its complaint. In February 2013, the plaintiff filed an amended lawsuit alleging that the Defendants violated federal antitrust law, California antitrust law and California unfair competition law. In March 2014, the Court entered an order staying the litigation pending the resolution of related litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and has subsequently continued the stay until June 2015. We are not currently able to determine whether there is a reasonable possibility that a loss has been incurred, nor can we estimate the potential loss or range of the potential loss that may result from this litigation.

Guarantees and Indemnifications

The Company has, in connection with the sale of patent assets, agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the buyer of such patent assets for losses resulting from breaches of representations and warranties made by the Company. The terms of these indemnification agreements are generally perpetual. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. To date, the Company has not paid any amount to settle claims or defend lawsuits. The Company is unable to reasonably estimate the maximum amount that could be payable under these arrangements since these obligations are not capped but are conditional to the unique facts and circumstances involved. Accordingly, the Company had no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2014 or 2013. The Company has no reason to believe that there is any material liability related to such indemnification provisions. The Company does not indemnify its clients for patent infringement.

In accordance with its amended and restated bylaws, the Company also indemnifies certain officers and employees for losses incurred in connection with actions, suits or proceedings threatened or brought against such officer or employee arising from his or her service to the Company as an officer or employee, subject to certain limitations. The term of the indemnification period is indefinite. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unspecified. The Company has no reason to believe that there is any material liability for actions, events or occurrences that have occurred to date.

Reserves for Known and Incurred but not Reported Claims

In August 2012, the Company began offering insurance to cover certain costs of litigation brought against its insured clients by NPEs. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had a total of 48 and 25 active policies, respectively, and has recorded a reserve of $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for known and incurred but not reported claims that represent estimated claim costs and related expenses.

The Company regularly reviews loss reserves using a variety of actuarial techniques and updates them as its loss experience develops.

Patent Asset Purchase Commitments

In November 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire patent assets for an aggregate purchase price of $3.0 million. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company paid the purchase price and acquired the patent assets in January 2014.