XML 44 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.24.1
Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2023
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block]
15. Commitments and Contingencies

a) Time charters: As of December 31, 2023, future minimum contractual time charter revenues assuming 365 revenue days per annum per vessel and the earliest redelivery dates possible, based on vessels’ committed, non-cancellable, time charter contracts, are as follows:

Year ending December 31,
 
Amount
 
2024
 
$
1,037,731
 
2025
   
671,396
 
2026
   
388,273
 
2027
   
214,211
 
2028
   
198,783
 
2029 and thereafter
   
315,556
 
Total
 
$
2,825,950
 

The above calculation includes the time charter arrangements of the Company’s vessels in operation as at December 31, 2023, but excludes the time charter arrangements of: 12 dry bulk vessels in operation for which their time charter rate is index-linked, three vessels in pool agreements, one dry bulk vessel for which the Company had not secured employment as of December 31, 2023 and 43 voyages for which their rate is index-linked. These arrangements as at December 31, 2023, have remaining terms of up to 92 months.

(b) Charter-in commitments: The Company had no charter-in commitments as of December 31, 2023.

(c) Capital Commitments: As of December 31, 2023, the Company had outstanding equity commitments  (i) of $21.8 million in relation to the acquisition cost of one secondhand dry bulk vessel (Note 7), of which approximately $16.4 million will be financed through an existing hunting license facility and (ii) of up to $103.1 million, in relation to the acquisition of five vessels through NML from third party shipowners (sellers) under sale and bareboat agreements, subject to final documentation, under which the vessels will be chartered back to the sellers under bareboat charter agreements.

(d) Debt guarantees with respect to entities formed under the Framework Deed: As of December 31, 2023 and following the transaction with York discussed in Notes 7 and 12, Costamare does not guarantee any loan with respect to entities formed under the Framework Deed.
 
(e) Other: Various claims, suits, and complaints, including those involving government regulations, arise in the ordinary course of the shipping business. In addition, losses may arise from disputes with charterers, agents or suppliers relating to the Company’s vessels. Currently, management is not aware of any such claims not covered by insurance or of any contingent liabilities, which should be disclosed, or for which a provision has not been established in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
The Company accrues for the cost of environmental liabilities when management becomes aware that a liability is probable and is able to reasonably estimate the probable exposure. Currently, management is not aware of any such claims or contingent liabilities not covered by insurance which should be disclosed, or for which a provision has not been established in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
The Company is covered for liabilities associated with the vessels’ operations up to the customary limits provided by the Protection and Indemnity (“P&I”) Clubs, members of the International Group of P&I Clubs.
 
A subsidiary of the Company and Costamare Shipping are defendants and third-party defendants to lawsuits pending in the United States Court for the Central District of California relating to liabilities associated with damage to a pipeline and an oil spill that occurred in October 2021 off the coast of Long Beach, California. The oil spill was caused by the rupture of a pipeline owned by Amplify Energy Corp. and certain affiliates (“Amplify”). The claimants in the lawsuit allege that a vessel owned by one of the Company’s subsidiaries, the containership Beijing, dragged its anchor across the pipeline many months prior to the rupture, during a severe heavy wind event when numerous other vessels were unable to hold their ground and dragged their anchors, and contributed to the spill. The complaint alleges that a vessel owned by another containership company also dragged its anchor across the pipeline on the same day.

In February 2023, the Company’s subsidiary, together with the other containership company, reached an agreement to resolve a putative class action claim for economic losses and property damage allegedly incurred by individuals and businesses affected by the oil spill.  Further, the Company’s subsidiary, together with the other containership company, reached agreements in February and April 2023 with various other parties that were actively asserting claims related to the oil spill, including having reached agreements to resolve claims asserted by Amplify and subrogation claims that were asserted by or could be asserted by a number of Amplify’s insurers relating to property damage, loss of production, and liabilities triggered by the discharge of oil from Amplify’s pipeline.  In connection with these settlements, neither the Company’s subsidiary nor Costamare Shipping have admitted liability. The payments that were required under these settlement agreements will be fully covered by insurance.
 
One claimant—the Pacific Airshow LLC—is continuing to pursue claims against the Company’s subsidiary, as well as the other containership company, for alleged losses relating to the cancellation of one day of the 2021 Pacific Airshow.  The United States Court for the Central District of California ruled that the Pacific Airshow LLC’s claim against the Company’s subsidiary was barred by the terms of the settlement the Company’s subsidiary reached in connection with the putative class action claim.  The Pacific Airshow LLC has appealed that ruling to the Ninth Circuit, and that appeal is pending.  The Company believes that adequate insurance is in place to cover any liability from this claim and from any other claim, if any should arise, relating to the oil spill that are pursued against the Company’s subsidiary.
 
On December 22, 2023, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s Office of Spill Prevention and Response issued a notice of violation to the Company’s subsidiary and Costamare Shipping alleging that they violated California Government Code sections 8670.20 and 8670.25.5(a)(1), which relate to notification of vessel disability or reporting of discharge or threatened discharge of oil and seeking civil administrative penalties. The Company is disputing the alleged violations.