2.4.0.82110100 - Disclosure - Commitments and Contingenciestruefalsefalse1false falsefalseD2013Q2YTDhttp://www.sec.gov/CIK0001503579duration2013-01-01T00:00:002013-06-30T00:00:001true 1us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstractus-gaap_truenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00falsefalsefalsexbrli:stringItemTypestringfalse0Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]2false 2us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlockus-gaap_truenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalseterseLabel1falsefalsefalse00<div style="font-family:Times New Roman;font-size:10pt;"><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;font-weight:bold;">Commitments and Contingencies</font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:justify;text-indent:48px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;">    </font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:left;text-indent:48px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;font-style:italic;font-weight:bold;"></font><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">In March 2008, in the matter captioned Sparks Nugget, Inc. vs. State ex rel. Department of Taxation, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that food purchased for use in complimentary meals provided to patrons and employees is not subject to Nevada use tax. The Company filed refunds for the periods from March 2000 through February 2008, and began claiming this exemption on its sales and use tax returns for periods subsequent to February 2008 given the Nevada Supreme Court decision. The amount subject to these refunds was approximately </font><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;color:#000000;text-decoration:none;">$15.6 million</font><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"> plus interest. The Department of Taxation subsequently audited the Company and issued a sales tax deficiency on the cost of food used in complimentary meals provided to patrons and employees for the period March 2000 through February 2008. On July 9, 2012, a Nevada Administrative Law Judge concluded that the State's sales tax deficiency for the Company's complimentary meals provided to patrons and employees for the period March 2000 through February 2008 would be allowed, but only to the extent of use tax previously paid for these meals. The Company appealed the decision. On October 1, 2012, the Nevada Tax Commission upheld the Administrative Law Judge's decision. The Company appealed that portion of the decision that denied the refund. </font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:left;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;"><br clear="none"/></font></div><div style="line-height:120%;text-align:left;text-indent:48px;font-size:10pt;"><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">Effective June 1, 2013, the Company and the Department of Taxation entered into a settlement agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to withdraw its refund requests in exchange for (a) the Department of Taxation agreement that it will make no claim against the Company for sales or use tax due on employee meals and/or complimentary meals provided to patrons for any prior periods and (b) the passage of prospective legislation that clarifies that employee meals and complimentary meals are not subject to sales or use tax. This prospective legislation was passed by the Nevada legislature and signed into law by the Governor on June 13, 2013. During the three months ended </font><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;color:#000000;text-decoration:none;">June 30, 2013</font><font style="font-family:inherit;font-size:10pt;">, the Company reversed the previously accrued sales and use tax on employee meals and complimentary meals provided to patrons, net of related accrued professional fees.</font></div></div>falsefalsefalsenonnum:textBlockItemTypenaThe entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 210 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682 Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 825 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 1 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621 Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 460 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 8 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249 Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 450 -SubTopic 20 -Section 50 -Paragraph 4 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349 Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 440 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 2 -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308 false0Commitments and ContingenciesfalseCommitments and ContingenciesUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownUnKnowntruefalsefalseSheethttp://www.stationcasinos.com/role/CommitmentsAndContingencies12