Native American Development

Following is information about the Company's Native American development projects, including historical information about the development activities of STN prior to the Effective Date.

The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria

On April 22, 2003, STN entered into development and management agreements with the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria ("FIGR"), a federally recognized Native American tribe. Pursuant to those agreements, the Company is assisting the FIGR in developing a gaming and entertainment project located in Sonoma County, California, and will assist the FIGR in operating the project upon completion. The FIGR selected STN to assist in designing, developing and financing its project, and upon opening, the Company will manage the facility on behalf of the FIGR. As currently contemplated, the project will have a total of approximately 320,000 square feet of space, of which approximately 150,000 square feet will be casino, and the remainder of which will be non–casino space, which will include multiple bars, a food court and various dining options. Construction of the casino commenced in June 2012 and the Company expects that the project will commence operations in the fourth quarter of 2013. There can be no assurance, however, that the project will be constructed and opened within this time frame.

The management agreement has a term of seven years from the date of the opening of the project. The Company will receive a management fee equal to 24% of the facility's net income in years 1 through 4 and 27% of the facility's net income in years 5 through 7. The Company will also receive a development fee equal to 2% of the cost of the project upon the opening of the facility. The management agreement may be terminated under certain circumstances, including but not limited to, material breach, changes in regulatory or legal status, and mutual agreement of the parties. There is no provision in the management agreement allowing the FIGR to buy–out the management agreement prior to its expiration. Under the terms of the management agreement, the Company will provide training to the FIGR such that they may assume responsibility for managing the facility upon expiration of the seven–year term of the agreement.

Under the terms of the development agreement, the Company assisted the FIGR in obtaining third–party financing totaling $850 million for the project, which closed on August 22, 2012. The Company and STN had advanced $172.3 million to the FIGR through August 22, 2012 for the development of the project, including, but not limited to, real estate acquisition costs, monthly payments to the FIGR, professional fees, consulting services, mitigation costs and design and pre-construction services fees. On August 22, 2012, the Company received a partial repayment of $194.2 million from the FIGR and recognized a gain of $102.8 million representing the difference between the carrying value of the project and the payment received. The gain resulted from the adjustment of the carrying value of the project to fair value upon the Company's adoption of fresh-start reporting at June 17, 2011, and the Company's deferral of its return on the advances until the carrying value had been recovered. The Company has no ongoing contractual obligation related to the amount collected, and the amount collected is nonrefundable. At September 30, 2012, remaining outstanding advances total $55.7 million, which will be recognized in income as collected. Effective August 22, 2012, the advances bear interest at the rate of 11.625%. Interest is payable in-kind during the construction period and will be payable in cash beginning in the first full quarter after the project opens. The Company expects that the remaining advances and accrued interest will be repaid from operations of the project. Such repayment is subordinate to the terms of the FIGR's third–party financing. STN paid approximately $2.0 million in payments related to the achievement of certain milestones, which were expensed as incurred, and the Company has no further commitments to pay milestone payments on this project.

Upon termination or expiration of the management and development agreements, the FIGR will continue to be obligated to repay unpaid principal and interest on the advances from the Company and STN, as well as certain other amounts that may be due, such as management fees. Amounts due to the Company under the development and management agreements are subordinate to the obligations of the FIGR under its third–party financing. The development and management agreements contain waivers of the FIGR's sovereign immunity from suit for the purpose of enforcing the agreements or permitting or compelling arbitration and other remedies.

In May 2008, the Department of Interior ("DOI") determined that approximately 254 acres of land (the "Site") just west of the Rohnert Park city limits in Sonoma County, California which had been acquired for the project would be taken into trust. The Site, which is approximately one–quarter mile from Highway 101 and approximately 43 miles from downtown San Francisco, is easily accessible via Wilfred Avenue and Business Park Drive, and will have multiple points of ingress and egress. Station owns an additional 34 acres adjacent to the project Site, which are being held for future development by the Company.

On May 7, 2008, the DOI published in the Federal Register a Notice of Final Agency Determination (the “Determination”) to take the Site into trust for the benefit of the FIGR. The publication commenced a 30-day period in which interested parties could seek judicial review of the Determination. On June 6, 2008, the Stop The Casino 101 Coalition and certain individuals filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the DOI and officials of the DOI. The Complaint sought judicial review of the Determination. On April 21, 2009, the DOI and FIGR's motions to dismiss were granted. On June 8, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an appeal (the “Appeal”) in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (the “Court of Appeals”), and the DOI agreed to voluntarily stay the taking of the Site into trust pending resolution of the Appeal. On June 3, 2010, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of the Complaint. On July 19, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing en banc. The Court of Appeals denied plaintiffs' petition on August 11, 2010.

On October 1, 2010, the Bureau of Indian Affairs of the U.S. Department of the Interior (the “BIA”) accepted the Site into trust on behalf of the FIGR for the development of the project.

On October 1, 2010, the National Indian Gaming Commission (the "NIGC") informed STN and the FIGR that the NIGC approved the management agreement by and between the FIGR and STN for Class II gaming at the planned gaming and entertainment facility. Class II gaming includes games of chance such as bingo, pull-tabs, tip jars and punch boards (and electronic or computer–aided versions of such games), and non-banked card games. A banked game is one in which players compete against the licensed gaming establishment rather than against one another. The FIGR and the Company always contemplated the approval of Class III gaming, which would permit casino–style gaming at the planned facility, including banked table games, such as blackjack, craps and pai gow, and gaming machines such as slots, video poker, lotteries and pari-mutuel wagering. Pari–mutuel wagering is a system of betting under which wagers are placed in a pool, management receives a fee from the pool, and the remainder of the pool is split among the winning wagers. In order to conduct Class III gaming, the FIGR was required to enter into a compact signed by the Governor of California, ratified by the California legislature and approved by the Secretary of the Interior (the "Secretary") and receive approval from the NIGC of a modification to the existing management agreement permitting Class III, or casino-style, gaming.

Representatives of the FIGR and the Governor negotiated a Class III gaming compact (the "FIGR Compact") and Governor Brown executed the Compact on March 27, 2012. The FIGR Compact provides for the FIGR to operate up to 3,000 slot machines at the proposed project in return for sharing up to 15% of the net proceeds with the State of California, Sonoma County, the City of Rohnert Park and other Native American tribes, which includes payments due to local authorities under any memorandum of understanding. Assembly Bill 517 (as amended), the legislation necessary to ratify the FIGR Compact, was introduced in the California legislature on April 19, 2012. On May 7, 2012, the California Senate passed A.B. 517 and on May 10, 2012, the California Assembly passed A.B. 517. The FIGR Compact was submitted to the DOI for consideration by the Secretary on May 21, 2012. The FIGR Compact was deemed approved by the Secretary and became effective when it was published in the Federal Register on July 11, 2012. On August 1, 2012, the Chairwoman of the NIGC approved the Amended and Restated Gaming Management Agreement between the FIGR and Station, thereby permitting the Company to manage all Class II and Class III gaming to be operated at the facility.

On May 21, 2012, certain plaintiffs filed a lawsuit in Sonoma County Superior Court to invalidate the FIGR Compact and the legislative acts of the California Legislature ratifying the FIGR Compact under Assembly Bill 517, codified at CA Government Code § 12012.56, and to enjoin Governor Jerry Brown from fulfilling the State's obligations under the FIGR Compact. The lawsuit does not name the FIGR or the Company as a defendant and does not seek any direct relief against any of them. The plaintiffs subsequently filed an amended complaint on July 31, 2012, adding a second cause of action in which they contested the validity of the mitigation agreement between the FIGR and the City of Rohnert Park, thereby alleging a violation of the FIGR Compact. In this action, plaintiffs argue that the reservation is not Indian lands within the meaning of State or federal law because the State has not ceded its sovereignty over the Site and that therefore the State is prohibited from entering into the FIGR Compact without violating the California Constitution. On June 14, 2012, the Sonoma County Superior Court (the "Court") rejected plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order that would have prevented implementation of the FIGR Compact. The Court also summarily decided that the facts presented by the plaintiffs did not warrant further briefing or consideration in the context of a preliminary injunction proceeding and noted that he did not see an avenue for the plaintiffs to pursue the case in State court. The plaintiff's amended complaint is pending before the Sonoma County Superior Court. Under the FIGR Compact, the FIGR was required to execute agreements with the City of Rohnert Park and Sonoma County providing for, among other things, the timely mitigation of effects that the construction of the casino may have on the environment and local infrastructure. The plaintiffs allege that the agreement between the FIGR and the City of Rohnert Park is invalid and that the FIGR, consequently, is in breach of the FIGR Compact. On October 10, 2012, the Court ruled in favor of the State's challenge to the legal sufficiency of plaintiff's second amended complaint, allowing plaintiffs to amend their complaint to join the Secretary of the Interior and the Chairwoman of the National Indian Gaming Commission as compulsory parties to the lawsuit. While the Company believes these claims are without merit, it cannot predict the outcome of the current case. Additionally, there can be no assurance that the plaintiffs will not bring future claims or appeal the decision of the Superior Court.

The following table outlines the Company's evaluation at September 30, 2012 of each of the critical milestones necessary to complete the FIGR project. Both positive and negative evidence was considered in the evaluation.



	As of September 30, 2012
Federally recognized as a tribe by the (BIA)	Yes
Date of recognition	Federal recognition was terminated during the 1950's and restored on December 27, 2000. There is currently no evidence to suggest that recognition might be terminated in the future.
Tribe has possession of or access to usable land upon which the project is to be built	Yes, on October 1, 2010 the DOI accepted approximately 254 acres of land for the project into trust on behalf the FIGR.
Status of obtaining regulatory and governmental approvals:
Tribal–State Compact	The FIGR have entered into a Class III gaming compact with the State of California, which was fully executed on April 27, 2012 and ratified by the California legislature on May 10, 2012.
Approval of gaming compact by DOI	The FIGR Compact was deemed approved by the Department of Interior and became effective when published in the Federal Register on July 11, 2012.
Approval of management agreement by NIGC	Yes; Class II and Class III gaming management agreement has been approved by the NIGC
Date	October 1, 2010; August 1, 2012 (for Amended and Restated Gaming Management Agreement)
DOI accepting usable land into trust on behalf of the tribe	Yes
Date	October 1, 2010
Gaming licenses:
Type	Class II and Class III
Number of gaming devices allowed	The FIGR Compact limits the number of Class III gaming devices to be operated at the facility to 3,000. There is no limitation on the number of Class II gaming devices that the FIGR may operate.
City agreement	The FIGR has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Rohnert Park under which the tribe has agreed to pay one–time and recurring mitigation contributions, subject to certain contingencies. Such payments will be included in the 15% of net proceeds payable under the FIGR Compact.
Date of city agreement	October 14, 2003
County and other agreements	The FIGR will enter into a memorandum of understanding with Sonoma County specifically defining the amount the FIGR will pay Sonoma County to mitigate the impacts of the project. Based upon a previous agreement with Sonoma County, the Company believes Sonoma County will enter into an agreement with the FIGR to mitigate certain local impacts of the project. Most mitigation payments will be included in the 15% of net proceeds payable under the FIGR Compact.

The Company has evaluated the likelihood that the FIGR project will be successfully completed and opened, and has concluded that at September 30, 2012, the likelihood of successful completion is in the range of 95% to 100%. The Company's evaluation is based on its consideration of all available positive and negative evidence about the status of the project, including the status of required regulatory approvals, and the progress being made toward the achievement of all milestones and the likelihood of successful resolution of all contingencies. There can be no assurance that the project will be successfully completed nor that future events and circumstances will not change the Company's estimates of the timing, scope, and potential for successful completion or that such changes will not be material. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will collect the remaining balance due on its advances for the project even if it is successfully completed and opened for business.

North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indian Tribe

On December 8, 2003, STN entered into development and management agreements with the North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians (the “Mono”), a federally recognized Native American tribe located near Fresno, California. Pursuant to those agreements, the Company will assist the Mono in developing and operating a gaming and entertainment facility to be located in Madera County, California. The Company has purchased, for the benefit of the Mono, a 305–acre parcel of land located on Highway 99 north of the city of Madera (the "Site").

As currently contemplated, the project is expected to include approximately 2,000 slot machines and approximately 60 table games and several restaurants. Development of the gaming and entertainment project is subject to certain governmental and regulatory approvals, including, but not limited to, approval by the California legislature of a Class III gaming compact with the State of California, the DOI accepting the land into trust on behalf of the Mono and approval of the management agreement by the NIGC.

The Mono entered into memoranda of understanding with the County of Madera, the City of Madera, and the Madera Irrigation District, on August 16, 2004, October 18, 2006, and December 19, 2006, respectively. Under these agreements, the Mono agreed to make monetary contributions to mitigate potential impacts of the project on the community, and also agreed to certain non-monetary covenants. In accordance with these agreements, the tribe has agreed to pay non–recurring mitigation contributions ranging from $13.2 million to $28.2 million and recurring annual mitigation contributions totaling approximately $5.1 million, all of which are subject to CPI adjustments. These contributions are intended to mitigate the impact of the project on law enforcement, public safety, roads and transportation, local land use planning, water conservation and air quality, as well as to provide funding for parks, recreation, economic development, education, behavioral health and certain charitable programs. The Mono's obligation to pay the contributions is contingent upon certain future events including acceptance of the land into trust, commencement of project construction, and for certain contributions, the opening of the project. The Mono also expects to enter into a mitigation agreement with CalTrans for state road improvements.

On April 28, 2008, the Mono and the State of California entered into a tribal-state Class III gaming compact (the “2008 Compact”) permitting casino-style gaming. The 2008 Compact was never ratified by the California legislature.

On August 6, 2010, the BIA published notice in the Federal Register that the environmental impact statement for the Mono's casino and resort project had been finalized and was available for review. On September 1, 2011, the Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs issued his determination that gaming on the Site would be in the best interest of the Mono and would not be detrimental to the surrounding community. In order for the Site to be taken into trust by the DOI for the benefit of the Mono, the Governor of California must concur in the Assistant Secretary's determination. Subsequent to the Governor concurrence, the Assistant Secretary will proceed with a final decision on having the Site taken into trust for gaming purposes. Notice of the trust decision must be published in the Federal Register together with the record of decision finalizing the environmental review process.

On August 31, 2012, the Governor of California concurred with the Assistant Secretary's determination that placing the Site in trust was in the best interest of the Mono and was not detrimental to the surrounding community. On the same day, Governor Brown also signed a new tribal-state Class III gaming compact (the “2012 Compact”) between the State and the Mono. The California legislature must still ratify the 2012 Compact and the DOI must then either approve the Compact or otherwise allow it to become effective by operation of law. Once effective, the 2012 Compact will regulate gaming at the Mono’s proposed gaming project on the Site. The 2012 Compact provides for the Mono to operate up to 2,000 slot machines at the proposed project. No assurances can be provided as to whether the DOI will accept the Site into trust for the benefit of the Mono, whether the California legislature will ratify the 2012 Compact, or whether the Secretary of the Interior will approve the 2012 Compact or otherwise allow it to become effective. Notwithstanding the foregoing, opponents of the project may still seek to exercise their legal remedies to delay or stop the project.

Under the terms of the development agreement, the Company has agreed to arrange the financing for the ongoing development costs and construction of the facility. Prior to obtaining third–party financing, the Company will contribute significant financial support to the project. The Company's advances are expected to be repaid from the proceeds of the third–party financing or from the Mono's gaming revenues; however, there can be no assurance that the advances will be repaid. STN began capitalizing reimbursable advances related to this project in 2003. Through September 30, 2012, advances toward the development of the project totaled approximately $18.0 million, primarily to complete the environmental impact study and secure the Site for the project, and the carrying value of these advances is included in Native American development costs on the Company's combined balance sheet. Reimbursable advances to the Mono bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.5%. With the adoption of fresh–start reporting, the carrying value of the advances was adjusted to fair value. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay approximately $1.3 million of payments upon achieving certain milestones, which will not be reimbursed and will be expensed as incurred. Through September 30, 2012, none of these payments had been made.

The management agreement has a term of seven years from the opening of the facility. The Company will receive a management fee of 24% of the facility's net income. The management agreement includes termination provisions whereby either party may terminate the agreement for cause, and the agreement may also be terminated at any time upon agreement of the parties. There is no provision in the management agreement allowing the tribe to buy-out the contract prior to its expiration. The management agreement provides that the Company will train the Mono tribal members such that they may assume responsibility for managing the facility upon the expiration of the agreement.

Upon termination or expiration of the management and development agreements, the Mono will continue to be obligated to repay unpaid principal and interest on the advances from the Company, as well as certain other amounts that may be due, such as management fees. Amounts due to the Company under the development and management agreements are secured by substantially all of the assets of the project. In addition, the development and management agreements contain waivers of the Mono's sovereign immunity from suit for the purpose of enforcing the agreements or permitting or compelling arbitration and other remedies.

The following table outlines the Company's evaluation at September 30, 2012 of each of the critical milestones necessary to complete the Mono project. Both positive and negative evidence was considered during the evaluation.



	As of September 30, 2012
Federally recognized as a tribe by the BIA	Yes
Date of recognition	Federal recognition was terminated in 1961 and restored in 1983. There is currently no evidence to suggest that recognition might be terminated in the future.
Tribe has possession of or access to usable land upon which the project is to be built	The Company has acquired usable land for the development of this project on behalf of the Mono. The land has not yet been accepted into trust for the Mono by the DOI. In determining whether land will be taken into trust for the benefit of the Mono, the Company considered the Secretary's determination that gaming on the proposed site is in the best interest of the Mono and would not be detrimental to the surrounding community. The Company also considered that the Governor has concurred with the Secretary's decision concerning taking the land into trust for the benefit of the Mono.
Status of obtaining regulatory and governmental approvals:
Tribal–State Compact	A new compact was negotiated and signed by the Governor of California and the Mono on August 31, 2012. The compact will be submitted to the California legislature for ratification during the 2013 legislative session. The Company believes that the compact will be ratified by the legislature due to the precedent set by the ratification of numerous tribal-state gaming compacts in the past.
Approval of gaming compact by DOI	Approval of the gaming compact by the DOI is expected to occur after the compact has been ratified by the California legislature. The Company believes the DOI will approve the compact because the terms and conditions thereof are consistent with past compacts that have been approved.
Record of decision ("ROD") regarding environment impact published by BIA	The Environmental Impact Statement for the project has not yet been published by the BIA. Based upon the Governor's concurrence in the Secretary's decision, the Company believes that the ROD will be published at the time of the publication of the Notice of Intent to take the land into trust. There is currently no evidence to suggest that a favorable ROD will not be issued. In determining that a favorable ROD will be issued and published, the Company has considered the extensive Environmental Impact Statement that was prepared and the Secretary's determination that gaming on the proposed site is in the best interest of the Mono and is not detrimental to the surrounding community.
BIA accepting usable land into trust on behalf of the tribe	It is anticipated that the land will be accepted into trust by the DOI after the issuance of the ROD. The Company cannot, however, predict when this will occur. There is currently no evidence to indicate that the land will not be accepted into trust. In determining that it is probable that the DOI will accept the land into trust, the Company considered the Secretary's decision concerning gaming on the land and the Governor's concurrence in such decision. The Company has also considered, however, the opposition to the project by other tribes in close proximity to the proposed site.
Approval of management agreement by NIGC	Approval of the management agreement by the NIGC is expected to occur following the BIA's acceptance of the land into trust. The Company believes the management agreement will be approved because the terms and conditions thereof are acceptable under IGRA and are consistent with previously approved management agreements.
Gaming licenses:
Type	Current plans for the project include Class II and Class III gaming, which requires that the California legislature ratify the compact and that the Secretary approve the compact or allow it to become effective. There is currently no evidence to indicate that the California legislature will not ratify the compact. (See comments above.) The NIGC must also approve the Company's management agreement.
Number of gaming devices allowed	The compact permits a maximum of 2,000 Class III slot machines at the facility. There is no limit on the number of Class II gaming devices that the Mono can offer.
Agreements with local authorities	The Mono have entered into memoranda of understanding with the City of Madera, the County of Madera and the Madera Irrigation District under which the Mono agreed to pay one-time and recurring mitigation contributions, subject to certain contingencies.

The timing of this type of project is difficult to predict and is dependent upon the receipt of the necessary governmental and regulatory approvals. There can be no assurance as to when, or if, these approvals will be obtained. The Company currently estimates that construction of the facility may begin in the second half of 2013 and estimates that the facility would be completed and opened for business approximately 18 months after construction begins. There can be no assurance, however, that the project will be completed and opened within this time frame or at all. The Company expects to obtain third–party financing for the project once all necessary regulatory approvals have been received and construction has commenced; however there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain such financing for the project on acceptable terms or at all.

The Company has evaluated the likelihood that the Mono project will be successfully completed and opened, and has concluded that at September 30, 2012, the likelihood of successful completion is in the range of 60% to 70%. The Company's evaluation is based on its consideration of all available positive and negative evidence about the status of the project, including, but not limited to, the status of required regulatory approvals, as well as the progress being made toward the achievement of all milestones and the successful resolution of all contingencies. There can be no assurance that the project will be successfully completed nor that future events and circumstances will not change the Company's estimates of the timing, scope, and potential for successful completion or that any such changes will not be material. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will recover all of its investment in the project even if it is successfully completed and opened for business.

Gun Lake Tribe

The Company holds a 50% interest in MPM, which manages the Gun Lake Casino (“Gun Lake”) in Allegan County, Michigan, on behalf of the Match–E–Be–Nash–She–Wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan, a federally recognized Native American tribe commonly referred to as the Gun Lake Tribe. The Gun Lake Casino, which opened in February 2011, is located on approximately 147 acres on U.S. Highway 131 and 129th Avenue, approximately 25 miles south of Grand Rapids, Michigan and 27 miles north of Kalamazoo, Michigan, and includes approximately 1,500 slot machines, 28 table games and various dining options. The Sixth Amended and Restated Management Agreement dated July 12, 2010 (the “Gun Lake Management Agreement”) has a term of seven years from the opening of the facility and provides for a management fee of 30% of the project's net income to be paid to MPM. Pursuant to the terms of the MPM operating agreement, the Company's portion of the management fee is 50% of the first $24 million of management fees, 83% of the next $24 million of management fees and 93% of any management fees in excess of $48 million, each calculated on an annual basis.

MPM is considered a variable interest entity under the provisions of ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASC Topic 810”). Under the terms of the MPM operating agreement, STN Predecessor was required to provide the majority of MPM's financing. In addition, based on a qualitative analysis, the Company believes it directs the most significant activities that impact MPM's economic performance and has the right to receive benefits and the obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to MPM. As a result, the Company is considered the primary beneficiary of MPM as defined in ASC Topic 810 and therefore consolidates MPM in its condensed consolidated financial statements. The creditors of MPM have no recourse to the general credit of the Company, and the assets of MPM may be used only to settle obligations of MPM.