XML 66 R14.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2013
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets  
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets

8.              Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets

 

On July 8, 2013, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), the government agency responsible for administering the Medicare program released its 2014 preliminary physician fee schedule.  The preliminary physician fee schedule proposes a 5% rate reduction on Medicare payments to freestanding radiation oncology providers. CMS provides a 60 day comment period and the final rule is expected in early November.  If the final rule maintains the current proposed rate reductions, the Company may record an impairment charge for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles assets. The Company expects the final ruling to be released in November, 2013. As a result the Company’s operating results could be materially impacted if the proposed rate decrease is implemented.

 

2012

 

On November 1, 2012, CMS released its final rule on the 2013 physician fee schedule which provided for a 7% rate reduction on Medicare payments to freestanding radiation oncology providers effective January 1, 2013. The Company completed an interim impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets based on the Company’s estimate of the proposed CMS cuts at September 30, 2012. In performing this test, the Company assessed the implied fair value of its goodwill. It was determined that the implied fair value of goodwill was less than the carrying amount, and as a result the Company recorded an impairment charge for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The implied fair value of goodwill was determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill that would be recognized in a hypothetical business combination. The estimated fair value of the reporting unit was allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit (including the unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the estimated fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid. Based on (i) assessment of current and expected future economic conditions, (ii) trends, strategies and forecasted cash flows at each reporting unit and (iii) assumptions similar to those that market participants would make in valuing the Company’s reporting units, the Company’s management determined that the carrying value of goodwill in certain U.S. Domestic markets, including Mid East United States (Northwest Florida, North Carolina, Southeast Alabama, South Carolina), Central Southeast United States (Delmarva Peninsula, Central Maryland, Central Kentucky, South New Jersey), California, South West United States (central Arizona and Las Vegas, Nevada), and Southwest Florida regions exceeded their fair value.  Accordingly, the Company recorded noncash impairment charges in the U.S. Domestic reporting segment totaling $69.8 million in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss during the quarter ended September 30, 2012. In addition, during the third quarter of 2012, an impairment loss of approximately $0.1 million, reported in impairment loss on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, was recognized related to the impairment of certain leasehold improvements of a planned radiation treatment facility office closing in Monroe, Michigan in the Northeast U.S. region.

 

Impairment charges relating to goodwill during the third quarter of 2012 are summarized as follows:

 

(in thousands):

 

Mid East
U.S.

 

Central
South East
U.S.

 

California

 

South West
U.S.

 

Southwest
Florida

 

Total

 

Goodwill

 

$

1,493

 

$

34,355

 

$

3,782

 

$

9,838

 

$

20,299

 

$

69,767

 

 

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company completed its annual impairment test for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets.  In performing this test, the Company assessed the implied fair value of our goodwill and intangible assets. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment loss of approximately $11.1 million during the fourth quarter of 2012 primarily relating to goodwill impairment in certain of our reporting units, including Central South East United States (Delmarva Peninsula, Central Maryland, Central Kentucky, and South New Jersey), and Southwest Florida of approximately $10.8 million. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2012, an impairment loss of approximately $0.1 million was recognized related to the impairment of certain leasehold improvements in the Delmarva Peninsula local market and approximately $0.2 million related to a consolidated joint venture in the Central Maryland local market.

 

Impairment charges relating to goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2012 are summarized as follows:

 

(in thousands):

 

Central
South East
U.S.

 

Southwest
Florida

 

Total

 

Goodwill

 

$

4,717

 

$

6,107

 

$

10,824

 

 

The estimated fair value measurements for all periods presented were developed using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).  For goodwill, the primary valuation technique used was an income methodology based on management’s estimates of forecasted cash flows for each reporting unit, with those cash flows discounted to present value using rates commensurate with the risks of those cash flows.  In addition, management used a market-based valuation method involving analysis of market multiples of revenues and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for (i) a group of comparable public companies and (ii) recent transactions, if any, involving comparable companies.  For trade name intangible assets, management used the income-based relief-from-royalty valuation method in which fair value is the discounted value of forecasted royalty revenues arising from a trade name using a royalty rate that an independent party would pay for use of that trade name.  Assumptions used by management were similar to those that management believes would be used by market participants performing valuations of these regional divisions.   Management’s assumptions were based on analysis of current and expected future economic conditions and the strategic plan for each reporting unit.