Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)	6 Months Ended
Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)	Jun. 30, 2013
Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis Of Presentation	Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete annual financial statements. During interim periods, the Partnership follows the accounting policies disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (“2012 Annual Report”), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The unaudited consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 include all adjustments we believe are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform to current period presentation. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2013. These unaudited consolidated financial statements and other information included in this quarterly report should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our 2012 Annual Report. The Partnership’s historical financial statements previously filed with the SEC have been revised in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to include the results attributable to properties acquired from the Fund in December 2012 as if the Partnership owned such assets for all periods presented by the Partnership including the period from January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012 as the transaction was between entities under common control. The consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the Partnership’s acquisition of the properties have been prepared from the Predecessor’s historical cost-basis accounts and may not necessarily be indicative of the actual results of operations that would have occurred if the Partnership had owned the assets during the periods reported. See our accounting policy for transactions between entities under common control set forth in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2012 Annual Report.
Accounting Policy Updates/Revisions	Accounting Policy Updates The accounting policies followed by the Partnership are set forth in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2012 Annual Report. There have been no significant changes to these policies during the six months ended June 30, 2013, with the exception to the update below.
General And Administrative Expenses Allocation	General and Administrative Expense Allocation The Partnership reimburses QRM for general and administrative expenses allocated to us based on the estimated use of such services between us and the Fund. The fee includes direct expenses plus an allocation of compensation costs based on employee time expended and other indirect expenses based on multiple operating metrics. If our sponsor raises additional funds in the future, the quarterly administrative services costs will be further divided to include the sponsor’s additional funds as well. QRM has discretion to determine in good faith the proper allocation of the charges pursuant to the Services Agreement. Management believes this allocation methodology is a reasonable method of allocating general and administrative expenses between us and the Fund and provides for a reasonably accurate depiction of what our general and administrative expenses would be on a stand-alone basis without affiliations with the Fund or QRM.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	Recent Accounting Pronouncements In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (ASU 2011-11). The objective of this update is to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable the users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position. The amendment requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. This scope would include financial and derivative instruments that either offset in accordance with U.S. GAAP or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This amendment became effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and the interim periods within those annual periods. This update, which expanded disclosures, was adopted by us in January 2013 and did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 5 – Derivative Activities for details on the expanded disclosures. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The ASU clarifies that ordinary trade receivables and receivables are not in the scope of ASU 2011-11. This ASU issuance did not impact our adoption of ASU 2011-11 as noted above.