UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                     

Commission file number: 0-54238

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland	27-3671639
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
3455 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania	15213
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(412) 681-8400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of February 12, 2013, there were 1,317,897 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP.

Table of Contents

			Page Number
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION				1
	Item 1:	Financial Statements		1
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 (unaudited)		1
		Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)		2
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)		3
		Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 (unaudited)		4
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)		5
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		6
	Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		21
	Item 3:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		26
	Item 4:	Controls and Procedures		26
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION				27
	Item 1:	Legal Proceedings		27
	Item 1A:	Risk Factors		27
	Item 2:	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		27
	Item 3:	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		28
	Item 4:	Mine Safety Disclosures		28
	Item 5:	Other Information		28
	Item 6:	Exhibits		28
SIGNATURES				29

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

	December 31,			September 30,
	2012			2012
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	779,153		$	583,633
Interest-bearing deposits in other institutions		14,083,223			7,525,961
Cash and cash equivalents		14,862,376			8,109,594
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value of $7,312,867 and $13,975,782, respectively)		7,274,945			13,873,592
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale, at fair value		14,915			15,813
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		436,800			502,600
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,182,038 and $1,142,038, respectively		114,933,591			112,440,299
Premises and equipment, net		1,202,429			1,214,909
Deferred tax asset, net		993,278			994,070
Accrued interest receivable and other assets		1,392,593			1,338,283
Total Assets	$	141,110,927		$	138,489,160
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing	$	3,605,963		$	4,107,787
Interest-bearing		112,958,921			110,388,759
Total deposits		116,564,884			114,496,546
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		802,508			517,517
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,204,898			1,089,109
Total Liabilities		118,572,290			116,103,172
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 1,345,250 shares issued and 1,317,897 outstanding at December 31, 2012; 1,345,250 shares issued and 1,325,397 outstanding at September 30, 2012		13,452			13,452
Paid-in capital		12,049,483			12,016,820
Retained earnings—substantially restricted		11,392,392			11,164,708
Accumulated other comprehensive income		925			1,019
Unearned ESOP shares		(501,299	)		(510,320	)
Treasury stock, 27,353 shares and 19,853 shares		(416,316	)		(299,691	)
Total Stockholders’ Equity		22,538,637			22,385,988
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	141,110,927		$	138,489,160

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2012		2011
Interest Income
Loans	$	1,576,952	$	1,552,209
Investment securities and other interest-earning assets:
Taxable		89,795		163,893
Tax exempt		16,215		10,318
Mortgage-backed securities		249		470
Total Interest Income		1,683,211		1,726,890
Interest Expense
Deposits		311,820		343,155
Total Interest Expense		311,820		343,155
Net Interest Income		1,371,391		1,383,735
Provision for Loan Losses		40,000		20,000
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses		1,331,391		1,363,735
Non-Interest Income
Service fees on deposit accounts		9,833		8,801
Other income		26,414		11,581
Total Non-Interest Income		36,247		20,382
Non-Interest Expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		474,460		453,654
Occupancy expense		106,482		89,197
Data processing expense		62,172		46,001
Professional services		68,934		63,143
FDIC insurance premiums		16,898		13,473
Other		132,414		89,603
Total Non-Interest Expenses		861,360		755,071
Income Before Income Tax Provision		506,278		629,046
Income Tax Provision		173,163		240,800
Net Income	$	333,115	$	388,246
Earnings per share—Basic and Diluted	$	0.27	$	0.31

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

2

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Statement of Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	For the Three			For the Three
	Months Ended			Months Ended
	December 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Net Income	$	333,115		$	388,246
Other comprehensive income:
Decrease in unrealized gains on AFS securities		(142	)		(413	)
Income tax effect		48			140
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(94	)		(273	)
Total comprehensive income	$	333,021		$	387,973

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012

(unaudited)

	Common Stock Shares Outstanding			Common Stock Amount		Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Unearned ESOP Shares			Treasury Stock			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance, September 30, 2012		1,325,397		$	13,452	$	12,016,820	$	11,164,708		$	1,019		$	(510,320	)	$	(299,691	)	$	22,385,988
Net income		—			—		—		333,115			—			—			—			333,115
Other comprehensive income												(94	)								(94	)
Compensation expense related to restricted stock		—			—		19,782		—			—			9,021			—			28,803
Compensation expense related to stock options		—			—		4,335		—			—						—			4,335
ESOP shares earned		—			—		8,546		—			—						—			8,546
Purchase of treasury shares		(7,500	)		—		—		—			—			—			(116,625	)		(116,625	)
Dividend payable		—			—		—		(105,431	)		—			—			—			(105,431	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		1,317,897		$	13,452	$	12,049,483	$	11,392,392		$	925		$	(501,299	)	$	(416,316	)	$	22,538,637

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2012			2011
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	333,115		$	388,246
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation of premises and equipment		12,480			40,987
Provision for loan losses		40,000			20,000
Net accretion/amortization of discounts and premiums and unamortized loan fees and costs		(1,356	)		4,080
Compensation expense for ESOP, restricted stock, and stock options		41,684			22,698
Deferred income tax expense		840			156,207
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		133,475			78,926
Increase in other assets		(187,785	)		(94,013	)
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(6,593	)		(30,041	)
Increase in other liabilities		122,383			182,443
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		488,243			769,533
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from maturities and redemptions of investment securities held to maturity		7,950,000			5,505,000
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity		(1,350,000	)		(6,450,000	)
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		65,800			32,500
Net increase in loans		17,170			574,381
Commercial leases purchased		(2,550,462	)		(2,954,114	)
Paydowns in mortgage-backed securities		758			6,793
Purchases of premises and equipment		—			(58,671	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		4,133,266			(3,344,110	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase (decrease) in deposit accounts		2,068,338			(1,033,851	)
Net increase in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		284,991			285,587
Purchase of treasury stock		(116,625	)		—
Payment of dividends		(105,431	)		(92,030	)
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		2,131,273			(840,294	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		6,752,782			(3,414,871	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR		8,109,594			11,347,761
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD	$	14,862,376		$	7,932,890
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest on deposits and borrowings	$	318,413		$	354,362
Income taxes paid		—			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 — Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies

Eureka Financial Corp., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Eureka Bank (the “Bank”), provide a variety of financial services to individuals and corporate customers through its main office and branch located in Southwestern Pennsylvania. The Bank’s primary deposit products are interest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposits. Its primary lending products are single-family residential loans, multi-family and commercial real estate loans, and commercial leases.

The Company was incorporated in September 2010 to be the Bank’s holding company upon completion of the Bank’s “second-step” conversion from the mutual holding company to the stock holding company form of organization, which occurred on February 28, 2011, and to serve as the successor entity to old Eureka Financial Corp., a federally chartered corporation previously existing as the mid-tier holding company for the Bank.

Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim information. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for the interim periods include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary, in the opinion of management, to fairly reflect Eureka Financial Corp.’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. Additionally, these consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to the SEC’s Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and therefore do not include all information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended September 30, 2012, as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 28, 2012.

The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with GAAP, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, valuation of deferred tax assets and other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities. The results of operations for the interim quarterly or year to date periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by weighted-average shares outstanding. Unallocated shares held by the Bank’s employee stock ownership plan are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by weighted-average shares outstanding plus potential common stock resulting from dilutive stock options. Treasury shares are not deemed outstanding for earnings per share calculations.

6

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and dilutive earnings per share computations for net income for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	For the Three
	Months Ended
	December 31,
	2012			2011
Weighted average common shares issued		1,345,250			1,259,704
Average treasury shares		(17,896	)		—
Average unearned ESOP shares		(56,797	)		—
Average unearned restricted shares		(27,840	)		—
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share		1,242,717			1,253,615
Net income	$	333,115		$	388,246
Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.27		$	0.31

Options to purchase 64,907 shares of common stock at a price of $15.24 per share were outstanding during the period ended December 31, 2012 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because doing so would have been antidilutive.

Reclassifications

Certain comparative amounts from the prior year period have been reclassified to conform to current period classifications. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income and stockholders’ equity.

Note 2 — Investment Securities

Investment securities held to maturity consisted of the following at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012:

	December 31, 2012
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
	(unaudited)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	2,024,945	$	51,204	$	(37,132	)	$	2,039,017
U.S. Government agency securities		5,250,000		28,800		(4,950	)		5,273,850
Total	$	7,274,945	$	80,004	$	(42,082	)	$	7,312,867
	September 30, 2012
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	1,425,468	$	28,878	$	(2,029	)	$	1,452,317
U.S. Government agency securities		12,448,124		78,029		(2,688	)		12,523,465
Total	$	13,873,592	$	106,907	$	(4,717	)	$	13,975,782

7

U.S. government agency securities with carrying values of $1,500,000 and $1,499,278, at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits held by the Company.

The amortized cost and fair value of securities held to maturity at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers might have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	December 31, 2012
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Due after five years through ten years	$	492,931	$	543,362
Due after ten years		6,782,014		6,769,505
	$	7,274,945	$	7,312,867
	September 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due after ten years	$	13,873,592	$	13,975,782

Temporarily impaired investments consisted of the following at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012:

	December 31, 2012
	Less than 12 Months					More than 12 Months				Total
			Gross					Gross				Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses		Value		Losses
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	1,153,110	$	(37,132	)	$	—	$	—	$	1,153,110	$	(37,132	)
U.S Government agency securities		745,050		(4,950	)		—		—		745,050		(4,950	)
Total	$	1,898,160	$	(42,082	)	$	—	$	—	$	1,898,160	$	(42,082	)

	September 30, 2012
	Less than 12 Months					More than 12 Months				Total
			Gross					Gross				Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
	Value		Losses			Value		Losses		Value		Losses
Obligations of states and political subdivisions	$	588,930	$	(2,029	)	$	—	$	—	$	588,930	$	(2,029	)
U.S Government agency securities		1,997,125		(2,688	)		—		—		1,997,125		(2,688	)
Total	$	2,586,055	$	(4,717	)	$	—	$	—	$	2,586,055	$	(4,717	)

The Company reviews its position quarterly and has asserted that at December 31, 2012, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines. The Company does not intend to sell and does not believe they will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity. All investments are interest rate sensitive. These investments earn interest at fixed and adjustable rates. The adjustable rate instruments are generally linked to an index, such as the three-month LIBOR rate, plus or minus a variable. The value of these instruments fluctuates with interest rates.

8

Eureka Financial Corp. had five securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2012. The Company has concluded that the unrealized losses disclosed above are not other than temporary but are the result of interest rate changes or sector credit ratings changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period. The Company’s current intention is not to sell any impaired securities and it is more likely than not it will not be required to sell these securities before the recovery of its amortized cost basis.

Note 3 — Mortgage-Backed Securities

The amortized cost and fair values of mortgage-backed securities, all of which are government-sponsored entities secured by residential real estate and are available for sale, are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2012
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
Freddie Mac Certificates	$	1,451	$	135	$	—	$	1,586
Fannie Mae Certificates		12,062		1,267		—		13,329
	$	13,513	$	1,402	$	—	$	14,915
	September 30, 2012
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Freddie Mac Certificates	$	1,552	$	106	$	—	$	1,658
Fannie Mae Certificates		12,717		1,438		—		14,155
	$	14,269	$	1,544	$	—	$	15,813

The amortized cost and fair values of mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2012 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to repay obligations without penalty.

There were no sales of mortgage-backed securities during the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and there were no temporarily impaired mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2012 or September 30, 2012. In addition, the Company had no securities in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2012 or September 30, 2012.

	December 31, 2012
	Amortized		Fair
	Cost		Value
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years		8,694		9,574
Due after five years through ten years		544		589
Due after ten years		4,275		4,752
	$	13,513	$	14,915

9

Note 4 — Loans

Major classifications of loans are as follows at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012:

	December 31,			September 30,
	2012			2012
One-to-four family real estate—owner occupied	$	22,827,005		$	22,841,158
One-to-four family real estate—non-owner occupied		29,464,664			29,150,275
Construction		409,638			448,170
Multi-family real estate		14,811,126			14,180,454
Commercial real estate		21,359,475			20,913,333
Home equity and second mortgages		1,228,143			1,261,447
Secured loans		204,070			269,520
Commercial leases and loans		20,006,091			19,411,283
Commercial lines of credit		5,989,243			5,283,445
		116,299,455			113,759,085
Plus:
Unamortized loan premiums		15,096			15,534
Less:
Unamortized loan fees and costs, net		(198,922	)		(192,282	)
Allowance for loan losses		(1,182,038	)		(1,142,038	)
Net loans	$	114,933,591		$	112,440,299

Loan Portfolio Composition

The loan and lease receivable portfolio is broken down into the following categories: (1) one- to four-family real estate loans – owner occupied and non-owner occupied; (2) construction loans; (3) multi-family real estate loans; (4) commercial real estate loans; (5) home equity and second mortgage loans; (6) secured loans; (7) commercial loans and leases; and (8) commercial lines of credit.

One- to four-family real estate loans include residential first mortgage loans originated by the Bank in the greater Pittsburgh metropolitan area. We currently originate fully amortizing loans with maturities up to 30 years. These loans have a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80%, unless they fall into our first time homebuyer program in our CRA Assessment Area, and then the maximum loan-to-value ratio can extend up to 95%. Due to our stringent underwriting, historical losses, and location of the majority of the portfolio, the Bank’s risk on this segment of the portfolio is considered minimal.

Construction loans include dwelling and land loans where funds are being held by the Bank until the construction has been completed. Dwelling construction consists of new construction and upgrades to existing dwellings. The normal construction period is six months. Construction loans on land are originated for developments where the land is being prepared for future home building. On-site inspections are performed as per the draw schedule for all construction loans. The risk associated with the construction loans is considered low as the Bank makes only a small number of these loans at any given time and adheres to the draw schedule to ensure work is being completed in a timely and professional manner.

Multi-family real estate loans include five or more unit dwellings. These loans could pose a higher risk to the Bank than the one- to four-family real estate loans and therefore are originated with a term of up to 20 years and a loan-to-value ratio of 75%. Different risk factors are taken into consideration when originating these loans such as whether the property is owner or non-owner occupied, location, the strength of borrower, rent rolls and total lending relationship with the borrower(s).

Commercial real estate loans consist of loans that are originated where a commercial property is being used as collateral. These loans also produce a higher risk to the Bank and have the same maximum terms and loan-to-value ratios as the multi-family loans. The risks associated with these loans are affected by economic conditions, location, strength of borrower, rent rolls and potential resale value should foreclosure become necessary.

10

Home equity and second mortgages include loans as first or second liens to any applicant who maintains an owner occupied or single family dwelling. These loans also include home equity lines of credit. The maximum loan amount is $100,000. The first and second lien combined cannot exceed 80% of the appraised value of the property. The risk to the Bank depends on whether we hold the first and/or second lien. We rely heavily on the appraised value to ensure equity is available, as well as the strength of the borrower. These loans are not considered to be more than moderate risk.

Secured loans are made to applicants who maintain deposit accounts at the Bank. The Bank will originate these loans up to a term of five years or to maturity date whichever comes first. These loans pose no risk to the Bank as the loan amount will never exceed the collateral that is securing the loan.

Unsecured improvement loans consist of loans that have no or very little useful collateral and therefore pose a greater risk to the Bank. These loans generally have a higher interest rate assigned to them and a maximum term of up to five years. Well documented underwriting is in place to ensure that the borrower has the ability to repay the debt. While the Bank does not originate a significant amount of these types of loans, they are considered to be moderate to high risk due to the unsecured nature of the loan.

Commercial leases consist of loans that typically are collateralized by either equipment or vehicles. Forms under the Uniform Commercial Code are filed on all collateral to ensure the Bank has the ability to take possession should the loan go into default. The maximum term is up to seven years but typically fall in the three- to five-year range which gives the Bank a quicker repayment of the debt. Based on the collateral alone, the value of which is sometimes difficult to ascertain and can fluctuate as the market and economic climate change, these loans have a higher risk assigned to them. However, our historical loss has been negligible over the last ten years, which is also taken into consideration when the loans are originated and before they are assigned a risk weighting.

Commercial lines of credit consist of lines where residential property is used as collateral. These loans are made to individuals as well as companies, and are collateralized by commercial property, equipment or receivables. The loan amount is determined by the borrower’s financial strength as well as the collateral. The lines are based on the collateral and the ability of the borrower(s) to repay the debt. The lines are closely monitored and limits adjusted accordingly based on updated tax returns and/or other changes to the financial wellbeing of the borrower(s). Subsequently, risk is controlled but considered moderate based on the collateral and nature of the loan.

Credit Quality

The Bank’s risk rating system is made up of five loan grades (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5). A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades follows:

Rating 1 – Pass

Rating 1 has asset risks ranging from excellent low risk to acceptable. This rating considers customer history of earnings, cash flow, liquidity, leverage, capitalization, consistency of debt service coverage, the nature and extent of customer relationship and other relevant specific business factors such as the stability of the industry or market area, changes to management, litigation or unexpected events that could have an impact on risks.

Rating 2 – Special Mention

A special mention asset has a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. The special mention classification is a transitory one and is the first classification that requires an action plan to resolve the weaknesses inherent to the credit. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

11

Rating 3 – Substandard

Substandard assets are assets that are inadequately protected by the sound worth or paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged. These assets have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified as substandard. The loans may have a delinquent history or combination of weak collateral, weak guarantor strength or income statement losses. These assets listed may include assets with histories of repossessions or some that are non-performing bankruptcies. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 4 – Doubtful

Doubtful assets have many of the same characteristics of substandard assets with the exception that the Bank has determined that loss is not only possible but is probable and the risk is close to certain that loss will occur. When a loan is assigned to this category the Bank will identify the probable loss and it will receive allocation in the loan loss reserve analysis. These relationships will be reviewed at least quarterly.

Rating 5 – Loss

Once an asset is identified as a definite loss to the Bank, it will receive the classification of “loss.” There may be some future potential recovery; however it is more practical to write off the loan at the time of classification. Losses will be taken in the period in which they are determined to be uncollectable.

Credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2012 were as follows:

	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
Non-owner occupied one-to-four family real estate	$	29,274,933	$	74,197	$	115,534	$	—	$	—	$	29,464,664
Construction		409,638		—		—		—		—		409,638
Multi-family		14,811,126		—		—		—		—		14,811,126
Commercial real estate		21,359,475		—		—		—		—		21,359,475
Commercial leases and loans		19,539,741		—		466,350		—		—		20,006,091
Commercial lines of credit		5,399,837		165,489		423,917		—		—		5,989,243
	$	90,794,750	$	239,686	$	1,005,801	$	—	$	—	$	92,040,237

Credit quality indicators as of September 30, 2012 were as follows:

	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
Non-owner occupied one-to-four family real estate	$	28,934,037	$	216,238	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	29,150,275
Construction		448,170		—		—		—		—		448,170
Multi-family		14,180,454		—		—		—		—		14,180,454
Commercial real estate		20,913,333		—		—		—		—		20,913,333
Commercial leases and loans		19,411,283		—		—		—		—		19,411,283
Commercial lines of credit		4,766,142		93,386		423,917		—		—		5,283,445
	$	88,653,419	$	309,624	$	423,917	$	—	$	—	$	89,386,960

The following tables present performing and non-performing residential real estate and consumer loans based on payment activity as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012. Payment activity is reviewed by management on a monthly basis to determine how loans are performing. Loans are considered to be non-performing when they become 90 days past due.

12

	Non-
	Performing		Performing
December 31, 2012	Loans		Loans		Total
One-to-four family real estate—owner occupied	$	619,586	$	22,207,419	$	22,827,005
Home equity and second mortgages		—		1,228,143		1,228,143
Secured loans		—		204,070		204,070
	$	619,586	$	23,639,632	$	24,259,218

	Non-
	Performing		Performing
September 30, 2012	Loans		Loans		Total
One-to-four family real estate—owner occupied	$	660,078	$	22,181,080	$	22,841,158
Home equity and second mortgages		—		1,261,447		1,261,447
Secured loans		—		269,520		269,520
	$	660,078	$	23,712,047	$	24,372,125

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A commercial line of credit loan with a balance of $423,917 was considered an impaired loan at December 31, 2012, with no related allowance. The Company did not recognize any interest income from this loan for the three month period ended December 31, 2012. There were no impaired loans at September 30, 2012.

The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of December 31, 2012:

	30-59		60-89		Greater than
	Days		Days		90 Days		Total						Nonaccrual
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Loans
One-to-four family real estate—owner occupied	$	217,043	$	—	$	619,586	$	836,629	$	21,990,376	$	22,827,005	$	619,586
One-to-four family real estate—non-owner occupied		74,197		115,534		—		189,731		29,274,933		29,464,664		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		409,638		409,638		—
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		14,811,126		14,811,126		—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		21,359,475		21,359,475		—
Home equity and second mortgages		8,034		—		—		8,034		1,220,109		1,228,143		—
Secured loans		—		—		—		—		204,070		204,070		—
Commercial leases and loans		248,014		218,336		—		466,350		19,539,741		20,006,091		—
Commercial lines of credit		—		—		423,917		423,917		5,565,326		5,989,243		423,917
	$	547,288	$	333,870	$	1,043,503	$	1,924,661	$	114,374,794	$	116,299,455	$	1,043,503

13

The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of September 30, 2012:

	30-59		60-89		Greater than
	Days		Days		90 Days		Total						Nonaccrual
	Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Loans
One-to-four family real estate—owner occupied	$	133,533	$	—	$	660,078	$	793,611	$	22,047,547	$	22,841,158	$	660,078
One-to-four family real estate—non-owner occupied		124,963		91,276		—		216,239		28,934,036		29,150,275		—
Construction		—		—		—		—		448,170		448,170		—
Multi-family real estate		—		—		—		—		14,180,454		14,180,454		—
Commercial real estate		—		—		—		—		20,913,333		20,913,333		—
Home equity and second mortgages		—		—		—		—		1,261,447		1,261,447		—
Secured loans		—		—		—		—		269,520		269,520		—
Commercial leases and loans		—		—		—		—		19,411,283		19,411,283		—
Commercial lines of credit		423,917		—		—		423,917		4,859,528		5,283,445		—
	$	682,413	$	91,276	$	660,078	$	1,433,767	$	112,325,318	$	113,759,085	$	660,078

Eureka Financial Corp. primarily grants loans to customers throughout Southwestern Pennsylvania. Eureka Financial Corp. maintains a diversified loan portfolio and the ability of its debtors to honor their obligations is not substantially dependent on any particular economic business sector. Loans on non-accrual at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 were approximately $1,043,500 and $660,000, respectively. The foregone interest on non-accrual loans was approximately $24,288 and $100 for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, there were no loans that were 90 days or more delinquent and still accruing interest.

14

The following table details the allowance for loan losses and loan receivable balances at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012. An allocation of the allowance to one category of loans does not prevent the Company’s ability to utilize the allowance to absorb losses in a different category. The loans receivable are disaggregated on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology.

	December 31, 2012
	One-to- four family real estate - owner occupied			One-to- four family real estate - non-owner occupied		Construction			Multi- family real estate		Commercial real estate		Home equity and second mortgages			Secured loans		Commercial leases		Commercial lines of credit		Non- allocated			Total
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance 10/1/2012	$	114,206		$	306,078	$	4,482		$	127,624	$	240,503	$	6,938		$	—	$	242,641	$	60,760	$	38,806		$	1,142,038
Charge-offs		—			—		—			—		—		—			—		—		—		—			—
Recoveries		—			—		—			—		—		—			—		—		—		—			—
Provisions (credits)		(71	)		3,301		(386	)		5,676		5,131		(183	)		—		7,435		8,116		10,981			40,000
Ending balance 12/31/12	$	114,135		$	309,379	$	4,096		$	133,300	$	245,634	$	6,755		$	—	$	250,076	$	68,876	$	49,787		$	1,182,038
Beginning balance 10/1/2011	$	308,028		$	—	$	2,615		$	121,452	$	284,883	$	7,049		$	—	$	216,894	$	—	$	59,117		$	1,000,038
Charge-offs		—			—		—			—		—		—			—		—		—		—			—
Recoveries		—			—		—			—		—		—			—		—		—		—			—
Provisions (credits)		102			—		1,317			4,048		9,265		301			—		6,550		17,630		(19,213	)		20,000
Ending balance 12/31/11	$	308,130		$	—	$	3,932		$	125,500	$	294,148	$	7,350		$	—	$	223,444	$	17,630	$	39,904		$	1,020,038
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance 12/31/2012	$	114,135		$	309,379	$	4,096		$	133,300	$	245,634	$	6,755		$	—	$	250,076	$	68,876	$	49,787		$	1,182,038
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	114,135		$	309,379	$	4,096		$	133,300	$	245,634	$	6,755		$	—	$	250,076	$	68,876	$	49,787		$	1,182,038
Loans receivables:
Ending balance 12/31/2012	$	22,827,005		$	29,464,664	$	409,638		$	14,811,126	$	21,359,475	$	1,228,143		$	204,070	$	20,006,091	$	5,989,243	$	—		$	116,299,455
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	423,917	$	—		$	423,917
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	22,827,005		$	29,464,664	$	409,638		$	14,811,126	$	21,359,475	$	1,228,143		$	204,070	$	20,006,091	$	5,565,326	$	—		$	115,875,538
Allowance for credit losses:
Ending balance 9/30/2012	$	114,206		$	306,078	$	4,482		$	127,624	$	240,503	$	6,938		$	—	$	242,641	$	60,760	$	38,806		$	1,142,038
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	114,206		$	306,078	$	4,482		$	127,624	$	240,503	$	6,938		$	—	$	242,641	$	60,760	$	38,806		$	1,142,038
Loans receivables:
Ending balance 9/30/2012	$	22,841,158		$	29,150,275	$	448,170		$	14,180,454	$	20,913,333	$	1,261,447		$	269,520	$	19,411,283	$	5,283,445	$	—		$	113,759,085
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment	$	22,841,158		$	29,150,275	$	448,170		$	14,180,454	$	20,913,333	$	1,261,447		$	269,520	$	19,411,283	$	5,283,445	$	—		$	113,759,085

15

Note 5 — Commitments

The Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss for loan and lease commitments (unfunded loans and leases) at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 was approximately $9,121,192 and $9,506,000, respectively, with interest rates from 2.25% to 6.75% and 2.25% to 6.75%, respectively. Fixed rate loan commitments at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 were approximately $2,233,616 and $4,293,000, respectively, with fixed rates of interest ranging from 1.75% to 6.75% and 4.00% to 6.75%, respectively.

In the normal course of business, there are various outstanding commitments and contingent liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of the Company’s customers. These arrangements have credit risk essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and are subject to the Company’s normal credit policies and loan underwriting standards. Collateral is obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer. Management currently expects no loss from these activities.

Note 6 — Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of their respective year-ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year-end.

The Company follows a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

For financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 are as follows:

16

	December 31, 2012
Description	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale	$	—	$	14,915	$	—	$	14,915

	September 30, 2012
Description	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale	$	—	$	15,813	$	—	$	15,813

The following table presents the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value as of December 31, 2012 by level within the fair value hierarchy. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are written down to fair value through the establishment of specific reserves. Techniques used to value the collateral that secure the impaired loan include: quoted market prices for identical assets classified as Level I inputs, observable inputs, employed by certified appraisers, for similar assets classified as Level II inputs. In cases where valuation techniques included inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and assumptions developed by management based on the best information available under each circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level III inputs.

	December 31, 2012
	Level I		Level II		Level III		Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	423,917	$	423,917

The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Company since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions that are presented below the following table were used to estimate fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012:

	December 31, 2012
	Carrying								Total
	Value		Level I		Level II		Level III		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,862,376	$	14,862,376	$	—	$	—	$	14,862,376
Investment securities held to maturity		7,274,945		—		7,312,867		—		7,312,867
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		14,915		—		14,915		—		14,915
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		436,800		436,800		—		—		436,800
Loans receivable, net		114,933,591		—		—		122,317,000		122,317,000
Accrued interest receivable		473,158		473,158		—		—		473,158
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	116,564,883	$	45,617,000	$	—	$	73,317,000	$	118,934,000
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		802,508		802,508		—		—		802,508
Accrued interest payable		93,483		93,483		—		—		93,483

17

	September 30, 2012
	Carrying								Total
	Value		Level I		Level II		Level III		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,109,594	$	8,109,594	$	—	$	—	$	8,109,594
Investment securities held to maturity		13,873,592		—		13,975,783		—		13,975,783
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale		15,813		—		15,813		—		15,813
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		502,600		502,600		—		—		502,600
Loans receivable, net		112,440,299		—				118,443,000		118,443,000
Accrued interest receivable		606,633		606,633		—		—		606,633
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	114,496,546		42,749,831	$	—	$	73,138,169	$	115,888,000
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance		517,517		517,517		—		—		517,517
Accrued interest payable		100,076		100,076		—		—		100,076

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Securities

The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices. For certain securities which are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidy and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence (Level 3). In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used. Management’s best estimate consists of both internal and external support on certain Level 3 investments. Internal cash flow models using a present value formula that includes assumptions market participants would use along with indicative exit pricing obtained from broker/dealers (where available) were used to support fair values of certain Level 3 investments.

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

The carrying value of the FHLB stock is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to restrictions on the securities.

Loans Receivable

The fair values for one-to four-family residential loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis using fields from similar products in the secondary markets. The carrying amount of construction loans approximated its fair value given their short-term nature. The fair values of consumer and commercial loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates reported in various government releases and the Company’s own product pricing schedule for loans with terms similar to the Company’s. The fair values of multi-family and nonresidential mortgages are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates based on a national survey of similar loans.

Accrued Interest Receivable

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

18

Deposit Liabilities

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the repricing date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values of certificates of deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies a comparable FHLB advance rate to the aggregated weighted average maturity on time deposits.

Advances from Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance

The fair value of advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date.

Accrued Interest Payable

The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Off-Balance Sheet Commitments

The values of off-balance sheet commitments are based on their carrying value, taking into account the remaining terms and conditions of the agreement.

Note 7 — Capital Requirements

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk-weightings and other factors.

The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend if the effect thereof would cause its net worth to be reduced below either the amounts required for the liquidation account discussed below or the regulatory capital requirements imposed by federal and state regulations.

The most recent notification from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” the Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, core and tangible ratios as set forth in the accompanying table. There are no conditions or events since the notification that management believed has changed the institution’s category. The following shows the Bank’s compliance with regulatory capital standards at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012:

											To be well Capitalized
											under Prompt
						For Capital Adequacy					Corrective Action
	Actual					Purposes					Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(in thousands)					(in thousands)					(in thousands)
As of December 31, 2012
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	22,156		24.20	%	$	7,324		>8.00	%		9,155		>10.00	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		20,974		22.91	%		3,662		>4.00	%		5,493		>6.00	%
Core (Tier 1) capital (to adjusted total assets)		20,974		14.83	%		5,656		>4.00	%		7,070		>5.00	%
As of September 30, 2012
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	21,745		23.77	%	$	7,319		>8.00	%	$	9,149		>10.00	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		20,620		22.54	%		3,659		>4.00	%		5,489		>6.00	%
Core (Tier 1) capital (to adjusted total assets)		20,620		14.85	%		5,528		>4.00	%		6,909		>5.00	%

19

The following is a reconciliation of the Bank’s equity under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to regulatory capital as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012:

	December 31,			September 30,
	2012			2012
	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Total equity	$	21,026		$	20,672
Unrealized (gains) on securities available-for-sale		(1	)		(1	)
Deferred tax asset—disallowed portion		(51	)		(51	)
Tier 1 capital	$	20,974			20,620
Allowable allowances for loan and lease losses		1,182			1,125
Total	$	22,156		$	21,745

Note 8 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-03, Transfers and Services (Topic 860): Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. The main objective in developing this Update is to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements (repos) and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments in this Update remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this Update apply to all entities, both public and nonpublic. The amendments affect all entities that enter into agreements to transfer financial assets that both entitle and obligate the transferor to repurchase or redeem the financial assets before their maturity. The guidance in this Update is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments in this Update result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments in this Update are to be applied prospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. Early application by public entities is not permitted. The Company has provided the necessary disclosures in Note 7.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The amendments in this Update improve the comparability, clarity, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income. To increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of U.S. GAAP and IFRS, the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. All entities that report items of comprehensive income, in any period presented, will be affected by the changes in this Update. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The amendments in this Update should be applied retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

20

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-09, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employer’s Participation in a Multiemployer Plan. The amendments in this Update will require additional disclosures about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan to enable users of financial statements to assess the potential cash flow implications relating to an employer’s participation in multiemployer pension plans. The disclosures also will indicate the financial health of all of the significant plans in which the employer participates and assist a financial statement user to access additional information that is available outside the financial statements. For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The amendments should be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. In order to defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the paragraphs in this Update supersede certain pending paragraphs in Update 2011-05. Entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before Update 2011-05. All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. This ASU is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Safe Harbor Statement for Forward-Looking Statements

This report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are not historical facts; rather they are statements based on the Company’s current expectations regarding its business strategies and its intended results and future performance. Forward-looking statements are preceded by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends” and similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Numerous risks and uncertainties could cause or contribute to the Company’s actual results, performance and achievements being materially different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause or contribute to these differences include, without limitation, general economic conditions, including changes in market interest rates and changes in monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government; legislative and regulatory changes; the quality and composition of the loan and investment securities portfolio; loan demand; deposit flows; competition; and changes in accounting principles and guidelines. Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in the Company’s in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on December 28, 2012, under the section titled “Risk Factors.” These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, the Company assumes no obligation and disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of Eureka Financial Corp.’s financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of income and expenses. We consider the accounting policies discussed below to be critical accounting policies. The estimates and assumptions that we use are based on historical experience and various other factors and are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, resulting in a change that could have a material impact on the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

21

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level representing management’s best estimate of known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio, based on management’s evaluation of the portfolio’s collectability. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged against income. Management estimates the allowance balance required using loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, the size and composition of the loan portfolio, trends and absolute levels of non-performing loans, classified and criticized loans and delinquent loans, trends in risk ratings, trends in industry charge-offs by particular segments and changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our lending areas and the national economy. Additionally, for loans identified by management as impaired, management will provide a specific provision for loan losses based on the expected discounted cash flows of the loan, or for loans determined to be collateral dependent, a specific provision for loan losses is established based on appraised value less costs to sell. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impaired loans; value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if actual conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. Further, current economic conditions have increased the uncertainty inherent in these estimates and assumptions. In addition, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings.

Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require us to make projections of future tax rates and taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset.

Valuation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities. We evaluate our investment securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment, which requires significant judgment. We assess whether other-than-temporary impairment has occurred when the fair value of a debt security is less than the amortized cost basis at the balance sheet date. Under these circumstances, other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred: (1) if we intend to sell the security; (2) if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) the present value of the expected cash flows is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. For securities that we do not expect to sell or that we are not more likely than not to be required to sell, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into credit and non-credit components. The credit-related other-than-temporary impairment, represented by the expected loss in principal, is recognized in non-interest income, while noncredit-related other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Noncredit-related other-than-temporary impairment results from other factors, including increased liquidity spreads and extension of the security. For securities which we do expect to sell, all other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings. Other-than-temporary impairment is presented in the income statement on a gross basis with a reduction for the amount of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Once an other-than-temporary impairment is recorded, when future cash flows can be reasonably estimated, future cash flows are re-allocated between interest and principal cash flows to provide for a level-yield on the security.

22

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012

Assets increased $2.6 million, or 1.9%, to $141.1 million at December 31, 2012 from $138.5 million at September 30, 2012, primarily due to a $2.5 million increase in loans receivable, a $6.8 million increase in cash and cash equivalents, offset by a $6.6 million decrease in investment securities held to maturity. Cash and cash equivalents increased and investment securities decreased $1.0 million primarily due to $8.0 million in called securities, primarily U.S. government agency securities, offset by the purchase of $1.4 million in investment securities. The increase in loans was primarily due to a $706,000 increase in commercial lines of credit, a $631,000 increase in multi-family real estate, a $595,000 increase in commercial leases and loans, and a $446,000 increase in commercial real estate loans. The increases were primarily the result of our continued offering of competitive rates, strong customer service and borrowings by long-standing and new lending relationships.

Eureka Financial Corp. actively manages credit risk through its underwriting practices and collection operations and it does not offer nor has it historically offered loans to subprime or Alt-A borrowers. There were two non-accrual loans at December 31, 2012 totaling $1,000,000 or 0.91% of total loans, compared to one loan totaling $660,000, or 0.58% of total net loans, at September 30, 2012. The non-accrual loan total for December 31, 2012 consisted of a $619,586 one-to-four family real estate loan and a $423,917 commercial line of credit. The non-accrual loan for September 30, 2012 was a one-to-four family real estate loan.

Total liabilities increased by $2.4 million, or 2.1%, to $118.6 million at December 31, 2012 from $116.1 million at September 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in deposits of $2.1 million, or 1.8%, and an increase of $285,000 in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance.

Stockholders’ equity increased $153,000 to $22.6 million at December 31, 2012 from $22.4 million at September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily the result of net income totaling $333,000, $33,000 related to stock benefit plans and $9,000 related to the ESOP, offset by the purchase of 7,500 shares at a cost of $117,000 during the period.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Overview.

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Dollars in thousands, except
	per share amounts)
Net income	$	333		$	388
Basic and diluted earnings per share		0.27			0.31
Average equity to average assets		16.22	%		14.13	%

The decrease in net income for the three months ended December 31, 2012 was primarily attributable to a $44,000 decrease in interest income, a $20,000 increase in the provision for loan losses and a $106,000 increase in non-interest expenses, offset by a $31,000 decrease in interest expense, a $16,000 increase in non-interest income, and a $68,000 decrease in income tax expense.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased $13,000 to $1,371,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012 from $1,384,000 for the comparable 2011 period. For the three month period ended December 31, 2012, lower net interest income was the result of a $44,000 decrease in interest income offset by a $31,000 decrease in interest expense. The decrease in net interest income resulted from a 5 basis point decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets, offset by a $8.3 million increase in the average balance of loans receivable. The decrease in total interest expense for the three month period ended December 31, 2012 was primarily attributable to decreases in deposit interest expense due to lower interest rates.

23

Rate/Volume Analysis. The following tables set forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by current volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of these tables, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionally based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2012
	Compared to
	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2011
	Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Rate			Volume			Net
	(In thousands)
Interest Income
Loans receivable	$	(92	)	$	117		$	25
Investment securities		(33	)		(36	)		(69	)
Total interest-earning assets		(125	)		81			(44	)
Interest Expense:
NOW money market accounts		(2	)		(2	)	$	(4	)
Passbook and club accounts		(1	)		1			—
IRA accounts		(17	)		(2	)		(19	)
Certificates of deposit		(17	)		13			(4	)
CDARS		(5	)		1			(4	)
		(42	)		11			(31	)
Net change in net interest income	$	(83	)	$	70		$	(13	)

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended December 31, 2012 was $40,000 compared to $20,000 for the comparable 2011 period. The increased provision in the 2012 period reflects growth in the loan portfolio with consideration given to the absence of charge-offs.

There was $1.0 million in non-performing loans at December 31, 2012 compared to $660,000 in non-performing loans at September 30, 2012. There were no net charge-offs for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Non-Interest Income. The following tables show the components of non-interest income and the percentage changes for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2012		2011		$ Change		% Change
Fees on deposit accounts	$	9,833	$	8,801	$	1,032		11.7	%
Other income		26,414		11,581		14,833		128.1	%
Total non-interest income	$	36,247	$	20,382	$	15,865		77.8	%

24

Non-interest Expense. The following tables show the components of non-interest expense and the percentage changes for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

	Three Months Ended
	December 31,
	2012		2011		$ Change		% Change
Salary and Benefits	$	474,460	$	453,654	$	20,806		4.6	%
Occupancy		106,482		89,197		17,285		19.4	%
Data Processing		62,172		46,001		16,171		35.2	%
Professional fees		68,934		63,143		5,791		9.2	%
FDIC insurance premiums		16,898		13,473		3,425		25.4	%
Other		132,414		89,603		42,811		47.8	%
Total non-interest expense	$	861,360	$	755,071	$	106,289		14.1	%

Salaries and benefits expense increased $21,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012 due primarily to a $20,000 restricted stock plan expense, $4,000 in stock options expense and a $2,000 increase in salary and benefits expense, offset by a $5,000 decrease in ESOP expense. Occupancy expense increased $17,000 due to a $9,000 increase in office building and furniture and fixtures expense and an $8,000 increase in equipment depreciation expense. Data processing expense increased due to an $8,000 increase in vendor costs and an $8,000 increase in hardware and software maintenance expense. Other expense increased $43,000 due primarily to a $21,000 donation to the state education tax credit program and a one-time expense of $20,000 related to an uncollectible account receivable.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $173,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2012 compared to $241,000 for the comparable period in 2011. The decrease in income tax expense in the 2012 period was primarily the result of a decrease in pre-tax income as the effective tax rate was comparable throughout the periods at 38%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and maturities of investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management policy.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The level of these assets depends on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalents totaled $14.9 million. In addition, at December 31, 2012, we had the ability to borrow a total of approximately $13.0 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. At December 31, 2012, we had no Federal Home Loan Bank advances outstanding.

At December 31, 2012, we had $9.1 million in loan commitments outstanding, which consisted of commitments to grant $1.8 million in loans and $447,000 in commercial leases. At December 31, 2012, we had $4.6 million in undisbursed lines of credit, $1.7 million in undisbursed construction loans and $500,000 in undisbursed loans in process.

25

Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2012 totaled $37.7 million, representing 54.2% of certificates of deposit, and 32.4% of total deposits at December 31, 2012. We believe, based on past experience, that we will retain a significant portion of these deposits at maturity. However, if these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before December 31, 2013.

The Company is a separate legal entity from the Bank and provides for its own liquidity to pay its operating expenses and other financial obligations. At December 31, 2012, the Company had $1.5 million in liquid assets.

Capital Management. The Bank must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth and deposit withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. Historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its deposits as they mature.

The Bank is required to maintain specific amounts of capital pursuant to Office of the Comptroller of the Currency regulatory requirements. As of December 31, 2012, the Bank was in compliance with all regulatory capital requirements, which were effective as of such date, with total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital and core capital ratios of 24.20%, 22.91% and 14.83%, respectively. The regulatory requirements at that date were 8.0%, 4.0% and 4.0%, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the Bank was considered “well-capitalized” under applicable regulatory guidelines.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit. For information about our loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit, see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q and in the Bank’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2012.

For the three months ended December 31, 2012, the Bank did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

This item is not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In addition, based on that evaluation, no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

26

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings. The Bank is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. The Bank’s management believes that such routine legal proceedings, in the aggregate, are immaterial to the Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

For information regarding the Company’s risk factors, see “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the SEC on December 28, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, the risk factors of the Company have not changed materially from those disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

					(c) Total		(d) Maximum
					Number		Number
					of Shares		of Shares
					as Part of		Yet To Be
	(a) Total		(b) Average		Publically		Purchased
	Number		Price		Announced		Under the
	of Shares		Paid		Plans or		Plans or
Period	Purchased		Per Share		Programs		Programs (1)
October 1 through October 31, 2012		—	$	—		—		111,617
November 1 through November 30, 2012		—	$	—		—		111,617
December 1 through December 31, 2012		7,500	$	15.50		7,500		104,117
Total		7,500				7,500

(1) On February 22, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the repurchase of up to 131,470 shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock, from time to time, depending on market conditions. The stock repurchase program will expire upon the purchase of the maximum number of shares authorized under the program, unless the board of directors terminates the program earlier.

27

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

 3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Eureka Financial Corp. (1)

 3.2 Bylaws of Eureka Financial Corp. (1)

 4.0 Form of Stock Certificate of Eureka Financial Corp. (1)

 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

 32.0 Section 1350 Certification

 101.0* The following materials from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Furnished, not filed.

(1) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-169767), as amended, initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 5, 2010.

28

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	EUREKA FINANCIAL CORP.
Dated: February 14, 2013	By:	/s/ Edward F. Seserko
		Edward F. Seserko
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(principal executive officer)
Dated: February 14, 2013	By:	/s/ Gary B. Pepper
		Gary B. Pepper
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(principal accounting and financial officer)

29