Registration Statement on Form S-1

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of the Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are being offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state or other jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

This is the initial public offering of American depositary shares, or ADSs, each representing ordinary shares of Skype S.A., a joint stock company (société anonyme) existing under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. We are offering ADSs to be sold in this offering, and the selling shareholders identified in this prospectus are offering an additional ADSs. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the ADSs to be offered by the selling shareholders.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our ADSs or our ordinary shares. It is currently estimated that the initial public offering price per ADS will be between $ and $ . We plan to file an application to list our ADSs on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol .

Investing in our ADSs involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 23 of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities nor passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the disclosures in the prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

To the extent that the underwriters sell more than ADSs in this offering, the underwriters have an option for days to purchase up to an additional ADSs from the selling shareholders at the initial public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions.

The underwriters expect to deliver the ADSs against payment in New York, New York on , 2010.

Neither we, the selling shareholders nor the underwriters have authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus or with any other information, and neither we, the selling shareholders nor the underwriters can assure you that information extrinsic to this prospectus (and any free writing prospectus prepared by us in connection with this offering) is reliable. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, our ADSs only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus, or other date stated in this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our ADSs.

Until (25 days after commencement of this offering), all dealers that buy, sell, or trade our ordinary shares, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

No action has been or will be taken in any jurisdiction by us, the selling shareholders or any underwriter that would permit a public offering of our ADSs or the possession or distribution of this prospectus or any free writing prospectus prepared by us in connection with this offering in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than the United States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus or any such free writing prospectus must inform themselves about and observe any restrictions relating to the offering and sale of our ADSs and

the distribution of this prospectus and any such free writing prospectus outside the United States. Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, references in this prospectus and any such free writing prospectus to “dollars” and “$” are to United States dollars and to “EUR” and “€” are to euro.

This prospectus has been prepared on the basis that all offers of ADSs will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Prospectus Directive, as implemented in Member States of the European Economic Area, from the requirement to produce a prospectus. Accordingly, any person making or intending to make any offer within the European Economic Area of ADSs which are the subject of the placement contemplated in this prospectus should only do so in circumstances in which no obligation arises for us or any of the underwriters to produce a prospectus for such offer. Neither the Company nor the underwriters have authorized, nor do they authorize, the making of any offer of ADSs through any financial intermediary, other than offers made by the underwriters which constitute the final placement of ADSs contemplated in this prospectus.

In the United Kingdom, this prospectus is for distribution only to persons which (i) have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the “Order”), (ii) are persons falling within article 49(2)(a)-(d) of the Order (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.), or (iii) other persons to whom it may otherwise lawfully be distributed under the Order (all such persons together being referred to as “Relevant Persons”). This prospectus is directed only at Relevant Persons and must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not Relevant Persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this prospectus relates is available only to Relevant Persons and will be engaged in only with Relevant Persons.

We are a company organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. A substantial majority of our assets are located outside the United States. Furthermore, some of our directors and officers named in this prospectus reside outside the United States and all or most of the assets of those officers and directors may be located outside the United States. As a result, investors may find it difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it may also be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States. It may also be difficult for an investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg or other foreign court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or these persons.

In particular, there is doubt as to the enforceability of original actions in Luxembourg courts of civil liabilities predicated solely upon U.S. federal securities laws, and the enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments entered by U.S. courts predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws will be subject to compliance with procedural and other requirements under Luxembourg law, including the condition that the judgment does not violate Luxembourg public policy.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information you should consider in making your investment decision. You should read this summary together with the more detailed information, including our historical combined and consolidated financial statements and the related notes, elsewhere in this prospectus. You should carefully consider, among other things, the matters discussed in “Risk Factors.” As used in this prospectus, “Skype Global” refers to Skype Global S.à r.l. (formerly Springboard Group S.à r.l. and formerly SLP III Cayman DS IV Holding S.à r.l.). Furthermore, as used in this prospectus, “Skype,” “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or “Successor” refer to Skype Global and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis prior to the completion of our corporate reorganization and to Skype S.A. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of the completion of our corporate reorganization and thereafter. As used in this prospectus, “Predecessor” refers to the communications business segment of eBay Inc. (“eBay”), which consisted of the assets and liabilities of Skype Luxembourg Holdings S.à r.l. (“Skype Holdings”) and its affiliates, Sonorit Holdings A.S. (“Sonorit”) and Skype Inc. (collectively, the “Skype Companies”). On November 19, 2009, Skype Global acquired the Skype Companies from eBay (the “Skype Acquisition”).

In this summary and elsewhere in this prospectus, we sometimes refer to our pro forma results of operations. Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, this pro forma data has been prepared on the basis described under “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information” and is subject to the assumptions and uncertainties described in that section. We also sometimes refer to Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure, in this summary and this prospectus. For a description of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, refer to “—Adjusted EBITDA” in this summary.

Our Company

Skype is a global technology leader that enables real-time communications over the Internet. Our software-based communications platform offers high-quality, easy-to-use tools for consumers and businesses to communicate and collaborate globally through voice, video and text conversations. During the first half of 2010, our users made 95 billion minutes of voice and video calls using Skype, video calls accounted for approximately 40% of all Skype-to-Skype minutes, and our users sent over 84 million SMS text messages through Skype.

Skype has grown rapidly to achieve significant global scale since we were founded in 2003. From June 30, 2009 to June 30, 2010, we grew our registered users from 397 million to 560 million. From the three months ended June 30, 2009 to the three months ended June 30, 2010, we grew our average monthly connected users from 91 million to 124 million and our average monthly paying users from 6.6 million to 8.1 million. See “Selected Financial Data—Key Metrics” for definitions of these metrics and their limitations. Although we have achieved significant global scale and user growth to date, the penetration of our connected and paying users is low relative to our market opportunity. It is our goal to continue to grow both our connected and paying users as Internet access proliferates globally and our penetration increases.

We believe the scale, global distribution and growth of our user base provide us with powerful network effects, whereby Skype becomes more valuable as more people use it, thereby creating an incentive for existing users to encourage new users to join. We believe that these network effects help us to attract new users and provide significant competitive advantages, such as strengthening our brand and enabling us to benefit from “viral” marketing, which provides us with a cost advantage by keeping our user acquisition costs low. In addition, our scale and network effects encourage other companies to form strategic relationships with Skype, creating more value for our users and increasing user engagement. For example, we have recently announced strategic relationships with leading mobile operators such as Verizon Wireless in the United States and with

television manufacturers (LG, Panasonic and Samsung) that embed Skype software in their applications and devices. Strategic relationships like these help us make Skype present in more communications devices, which increases the accessibility and usage of Skype by our large and growing user base.

We believe our highly scalable peer-to-peer software architecture gives us a significant cost advantage compared to conventional communications networks because it utilizes our users’ existing Internet connections and does not require us to build or maintain a physical communications network. As a result, we can add new users and provide them with a wide range of communications tools at minimal incremental cost to us, allowing us to offer many of our products for free. We believe our low cost and highly scalable peer-to-peer software architecture positions us to grow in new regions faster and address opportunities more quickly than many other competitive offerings.

In the first six months of 2010, we generated $406.2 million of net revenues, and our Adjusted EBITDA was $115.8 million. While Skype-to-Skype voice, video and text conversations are free, our primary source of revenue, to date, has been from the purchase of credit (on a pay-as-you-go or subscription basis) for our SkypeOut product, which provides low-priced calling to landlines and mobile devices. Going forward, we plan to continue growing and diversifying our sources of revenue in four specific areas:

•

First, we believe that there is a significant opportunity to grow our user base.

•

Second, we believe that we can generate more communications revenue from our users by improving awareness and adoption of our paid products and introducing premium products such as group video calling.

•

Third, we will continue to develop new monetization models for our large connected user base. We currently generate a small portion of our net revenues through marketing services (such as advertising) and licensing, which we expect will grow as a percentage of our net revenues over time.

•

Fourth, we will broaden our user base to include more business users. For example, we have recently released and will continue to develop and market Skype for Business products that aim to capitalize on demand for Skype from small, medium and large businesses.

Recent Developments

In November 2009, we were acquired from eBay by an investor group, led by Silver Lake and including the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB) and Andreessen Horowitz. In connection with the Skype Acquisition, eBay received a significant ownership stake in the Company, and Joltid also made an equity investment in the Company. We believe that our investor group includes a unique combination of investors and operators with specific domain expertise and skill sets, including Silver Lake, a leading large-scale global technology investor with extensive operating experience; CPPIB, an institutional investor with deep sector expertise, and Andreessen Horowitz, an Internet-focused venture capital specialist, together with the Internet experience of eBay and the Skype-specific and consumer-facing Internet knowledge of Skype’s founders.

Since the Skype Acquisition, we have continued to pursue our mission to be the worldwide communications platform of choice and have made significant improvements in our business. In particular, we have made significant investments in people and infrastructure, and we have continued to increase our user base, revenues and Adjusted EBITDA while adding new products and partnerships and further strengthening our capital structure.

Examples of our recent progress include:

Acquisition of Intellectual Property

•

In November 2009, we acquired from Joltid the intellectual property rights to the technology that facilitates communications in the peer-to-peer network of Skype users. We acquired this technology as

part of a settlement that we and eBay reached with Joltid regarding our use of this peer-to-peer communication technology, in which all outstanding litigation between the parties was resolved. Joltid also made an investment of $80 million in us. We refer to these matters collectively as the “Joltid Transaction.”

Increased Investment

•

People. We recruited several new executives to strengthen our senior management team, including, among others, a new Chief Financial Officer, Chief Marketing Officer, Chief Legal Officer and a new Head of Skype for Business, and grew our number of employees and contractors from 640 as of June 30, 2009 to 839 as of June 30, 2010.

•

Infrastructure. We have budgeted to invest approximately $37 million in capital expenditures in 2010, a substantial increase from $13.5 million in 2009. We are investing large amounts in a new SAP ERP system, for internal reporting and other control processes, and in Human Resources systems to help us systematically attract, develop and manage our workforce. We are also investing to provide new office infrastructure across multiple geographies to support our growth.

Sustained Growth

•

Users, net revenues and Adjusted EBITDA. We have significantly increased both our free and paying users, growing our average monthly connected users by 36% and average monthly paying users by 23%, from the three months ended June 30, 2009 to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Net revenues increased by 25.1% from $324.8 million in the first six months of 2009 to $406.2 million in the first six months of 2010 and Adjusted EBITDA increased by 53.9% from $75.2 million in the first six months of 2009 to $115.8 million in the first six months of 2010.

•

Strategic relationships. We have launched several important commercial strategic relationships, including one with Verizon Wireless in the mobile market in the United States and others in the consumer electronics market, such as arrangements with LG, Panasonic and Samsung to embed Skype in certain HD televisions. More broadly, in July 2010, we released SkypeKit, a software development tool designed to meet demand from independent software developers and consumer electronics manufacturers to incorporate Skype functionality within their own applications and devices.

•

Products. We have released a significant number of new products, including:

•

Mobile. We have released Skype products on multiple platforms including iOS (iPhone), Blackberry, Linux, Android and Symbian.

•

Premium products. We have launched our group video calling product in a trial “beta” version of our Skype 5.0 for Windows client and announced that it will be available as part of a premium product.

•

Marketing services, including advertising. We have launched products that allow businesses to market their products or services selectively to our user base, including Click & Call, which enables users to initiate a Skype call from a website to participating businesses.

•

Skype for Business. We have launched our Skype for Business product offerings: Skype Manager, which allows businesses to manage Skype accounts for their employees, and Skype Connect, which allows businesses to connect their private telephone branch exchange (PBX) over the Internet to Skype’s peer-to-peer user network to achieve low-cost calling.

Capital Structure

•

Financing. We raised $825 million face amount of debt to help finance the Skype Acquisition, consisting of $700 million face amount of senior debt and a payment-in kind loan of $125 million from

eBay. We refinanced our debt in February 2010. As part of this refinancing, we reduced our total debt and significantly lowered our cost of debt by increasing our senior debt to a U.S. dollar equivalent $775 million face amount while repaying the eBay payment-in-kind note in full. We also have a $30 million revolving credit facility.

Our Platform

The large and growing global market for communications and collaboration solutions is being transformed by the Internet. We believe that underlying market forces increasingly challenge the ways that communications have traditionally been provided and offer opportunities for innovative and disruptive solutions such as ours to help accelerate the transformation of the global communications industry. These market forces include a growing desire to communicate globally, increasing Internet penetration, expansion and diversification of the ways people communicate, and proliferation of Internet-connected devices. Furthermore, as the Internet transforms the ways that people communicate, new markets and business models are being developed, including social networking, advertising, social gaming and virtual goods. We believe that our large and engaged user base, combined with our easy-to-use, high-quality platform, position us well to compete in these markets over time as they evolve.

We have developed an innovative software-based communications platform that offers a simple and convenient way for our users to stay in touch virtually anywhere in the world. Skype users can have free voice, video and text conversations with other Skype users, or can call anyone with a landline or mobile phone number at a low cost. We believe that our platform is well-positioned to capitalize on the market forces that are transforming the global communications industry:

•

We facilitate global communication and collaboration. Our software platform is currently available in 29 languages, and we have an extremely broad reach in countries throughout the world.

•

We leverage existing fixed and wireless Internet infrastructure. Our software platform only requires an Internet-connected device to connect instantly with our global network of 124 million average monthly connected users (for the three months ended June 30, 2010) for free, or with mobile and landlines around the world at a low price.

•

We offer numerous communication tools and ways to communicate and collaborate. In addition to voice and video calling, our software platform also offers a variety of communication and collaboration methods, such as instant messaging, paid SMS messaging, screen sharing and file transferring. Features are seamlessly tied together on the Skype platform, allowing our users to switch easily between various ways of communicating and collaborating.

•

Skype is available on diverse Internet-connected devices. Because Skype is software-based, users can access their Skype account and enjoy our software platform’s functionality from virtually any Internet-connected device. Skype is currently available, either pre-installed or through user download, on desktops and laptops, as well as selected mobile phones, netbooks, tablets, televisions and video game consoles.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe our solution and business model distinguish us from alternative providers and bring us a number of differentiated competitive strengths:

•

Large, growing and diverse global user base. Our user base is large and continues to grow rapidly and is geographically and demographically diverse, as our software is used by people in countries throughout the world. Our software has broad global appeal and is actively used by people across gender, age and income groups, helping everyone from business executives to grandparents to schoolchildren stay connected.

•

Strong network effects. We and our users benefit from network effects. Skype becomes more valuable as more people use Skype, thereby creating an incentive for existing users to encourage new users to join. This results in viral marketing and lower marketing expense for Skype.

•

Strong communications brand. Despite low levels of marketing spending by us to date, we believe that Skype is among the most recognized brands in Internet communications, appealing to a broad range of people across diverse demographic groups and geographies.

•

Low cost and highly scalable peer-to-peer architecture. The peer-to-peer architecture created by our software platform connects our users by utilizing their existing network and computing resources. This provides us with a significant cost advantage because we are not required to build or maintain a physical communications network, such as a wire or fiber optic network or cellular infrastructure.

•

High-quality, multi-feature voice and video product suite. We offer a wide range of tools for our users to communicate and collaborate, including voice and video calling, instant messaging, screen sharing and file transferring. For example, we recently introduced group video calling in a trial “beta” version of our Skype 5.0 for Windows client, which allows our users to communicate with up to five other users in a simultaneous video conversation. During the first half of 2010, approximately 40% of our Skype-to-Skype minutes were video calls, which we believe demonstrates the high quality and utility of our video products.

•

Payment infrastructure. Because of our size and experience we have the ability to collect small payments in many countries around the world. We currently accept payments in 15 currencies. We are able to accept multiple forms of payment, including PayPal, credit cards, debit cards, by paying cash for a voucher and by transferring bank funds. Additionally, we have substantial experience addressing fraudulent payment activity and have developed sophisticated anti-fraud practices and systems.

•

Software platform that is device and network agnostic. Unlike some competitive offerings, our platform is software-based and is available across multiple devices and networks. Our software runs on virtually all major computer and mobile operating systems and on multiple hardware platforms, including televisions and mobile phones, and across Internet and mobile telecommunications networks.

•

Attractive financial structure. We believe that our business benefits from an attractive financial structure. For example, our cash flow and working capital are enhanced by the fact that users of our paid communications services products, including SkypeOut, pay us in advance of their use of our products; and the growing popularity of our subscription-based products provides us with higher predictability regarding our future revenues. We believe our business is also characterized by low operating and capital expenditures as a result of the strong network effects that help us grow our user base, our strong communications brand, which we have built despite low levels of marketing spending, and the low-cost peer-to-peer architecture that does not require us to build or maintain a network. Furthermore, we have relatively low cash tax expense, expressed as a percentage of our income or loss before income taxes. This financial structure provides us the opportunity to invest cash generated from our operating activities in the continued development of innovative products and technologies with the objective of further improving and diversifying our portfolio of products.

Our Users

We believe that the growth and loyalty of our user base validate our competitive strengths. Our registered, connected and paying users have grown over time, which we believe is primarily attributable to the network effects of our users, our strong global brand and our differentiated technology and product offering. For a description of how we calculate each of our metrics, see “Selected Financial Data—Key Metrics.” The chart below highlights the growth in our users since 2007:

LOGO

⁽¹⁾

Our registered user metric is difficult for us to verify and is subject to a degree of overstatement. For more information, see “Risk Factors—The number of our registered users overstates the number of unique individuals who register to use our products.” Our registered user number includes users who registered through their MySpace account and excludes users that have registered on Skype through our investment to address the Chinese market, Tel-Online Limited. For more information, see “Selected Financial Data—Key Metrics.”

⁽²⁾

Our connected and paying user metrics are subject to uncertainties and inaccuracies and may be overstated or understated. For more information, see “Risk Factors—Our connected users metric is subject to uncertainties and may overstate the number of users who actively use our products” and “—Our paying user and communications services billing minutes metrics are subject to a degree of inaccuracy due to fraudulent transactions and our method of calculating these metrics.” Our average monthly connected and paying user numbers include users who registered through their MySpace account and exclude users that have connected to Skype through our investment to address the Chinese market, Tel-Online Limited. For more information, see “Selected Financial Data—Key Metrics.”

Since 2008, our connected users have increased rapidly due to the increasing popularity of our free products, including video calling, which represented approximately 40% of all Skype-to-Skype minutes for the first half of 2010. We view the growth in our connected user base as an opportunity to convert more of these connected users into paying users in the future.

Our paying users exhibit strong long-term loyalty as well as stable spending patterns over time, as demonstrated by our monthly pay-as-you-go billings data trends. For example, pay-as-you-go billings for users who first registered with Skype before 2008 were substantially the same in December 2009 as they were in December 2008.

Skype appeals to a geographically and demographically diverse range of users. People use Skype in a variety of different ways, from friends or relatives calling each other in different cities or countries, to grandparents video-calling their grandchildren, to teachers conducting classes remotely, to students text messaging each other or to business associates transferring files or screen-sharing. Our appeal is global, and our users correspondingly vary in age, gender and professional background. For example, for the three months ended

June 30, 2010, connected users registered in the United States represented approximately 16% of our global average monthly connected users, while no other single country represented more than 7% of our average monthly connected users.

Our Strategy

Our mission is to be the communications platform of choice for consumers and businesses around the world. We believe we have a significant opportunity to grow our users, revenue and profitability by increasing the penetration of our user base, expanding their use of our free and paid products, and by developing new products and monetization models as the industry continues to evolve. Our strategy has four key components:

Continue to grow our connected and paying user base. In the three months ended June 30, 2010, we had 124 million average monthly connected users and 8.1 million average monthly paying users. We aim to grow our user base and increase the portion of our users who use paid products by supplementing our viral marketing with new marketing initiatives and strategic relationships.

Increase usage of our free and paid products and extend our relationship with our users. As our users continue to use Skype more often, they begin to recognize the full benefits of using our products and many migrate to using Skype as their preferred communications tool across a variety of connected devices. We seek to capitalize on this migration path and to grow usage of our free and paid products through multiple initiatives, including improving our suite of free products, adding new features and paid products, increasing our users’ awareness of our paid products and making it easier for users to pay. We also intend to promote our subscription products and to continue developing Skype software for multiple platforms to increase the accessibility of Skype to our user base around the world.

Develop new monetization models, including advertising. Our users made over 152 billion minutes of Skype-to-Skype calls in the twelve months ended June 30, 2010. We believe this represents a meaningful opportunity to increase our revenue from alternative monetization models, including advertising, gaming and virtual gifts.

Broaden our user base to include more business users. We believe the business communications market represents a large opportunity for Skype. Approximately 37% of over 40,000 of our connected users surveyed in the first quarter of 2010 told us that they use our product platform occasionally or often for business-related purposes. We believe there is a significant opportunity to better serve the communications needs of the small and medium enterprise segment, as well as larger enterprise customers, by focusing on user needs in this market and developing additional products specifically tailored to business users.

Risks Affecting Our Business

You should carefully consider the risks described under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. These risks could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition materially and could cause the market price of the American Depositary Shares, or ADSs, representing our ordinary shares to decline and could result in a partial or total loss of your investment.

Corporate Reorganization

operations and has only nominal assets, including a 100% interest in Skype Global Holdco S.à r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), which itself does not engage in any operations and holds no material assets. The corporate reorganization will involve, among other steps, the conversion of Skype S.à r.l. into a Luxembourg joint stock company (société anonyme), Skype S.A., and the acquisition of the shares of Skype Global S.à r.l. by Skype S.A., as further described in “Corporate Reorganization.” Investors in this offering will only receive, and this prospectus only describes the offering of, ADSs representing the ordinary shares of Skype S.A.

Principal Shareholders

In November 2009, we were acquired by an investor group, led by Silver Lake and including the CPP Investment Board Private Holdings Inc. and Andreessen Horowitz. In connection with the Skype Acquisition, eBay received a significant ownership stake in the Company, and Joltid, which was founded by the original founders of Skype, also invested in the Company.

Principal Executive Offices

Skype S.à r.l. was incorporated as a limited liability company (a société à responsabilité limitée) under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in July 2010 and will be transformed into a Luxembourg joint stock company (a société anonyme) becoming Skype S.A. as part of the corporate reorganization described under “Corporate Reorganization.” Skype Global S.à r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company (a société à responsabilité limitée or “S.à r.l.”), was organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in September 2008. Our principal executive office is located at 22/24 Boulevard Royal, 6e étage, L-2449 Luxembourg, and our telephone number at this address is +352 2663 9130. Our website is www.skype.com. Information on, or accessible through, our website is not a part of, and is not incorporated into, this prospectus.

All of our activities are conducted through various subsidiaries, which are organized and operated according to the laws of their country of incorporation.

Skype, associated trademarks and logos (including SkypeIn, SkypeOut, Skype To Go, Skype Access, Skype Certified and SILK) and the “S” symbol are our trademarks. This prospectus also may refer to brand names, trademarks, service marks and trade names of other companies and organizations, and those brand names, trademarks, service marks and trade names are the property of their respective owners.

The Offering

ADSs offered by us

ADSs

ADSs offered by the selling shareholders

ADSs (or ADSs if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional ADSs in full)

Ordinary shares outstanding immediately after this offering

ordinary shares (including ordinary shares represented by ADSs)

Use of proceeds

We estimate that we will receive net proceeds of approximately $ million from the sale by us of ADSs offered in this offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We intend to use the net proceeds received by us in connection with this offering for general corporate purposes.

Furthermore, in connection with the termination of the management services agreements with certain of our shareholders and their affiliates, we will pay approximately $ million to such counterparties, on the date of the consummation of this offering, using a portion of the proceeds of this offering. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Management Services Agreements.”

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of approximately $ million of ADSs to be offered by the selling shareholders. See “Principal and Selling Shareholders.”

Dividend policy

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our available funds for use in the operation and development of our business. See “Dividend Policy.”

Proposed Nasdaq Global Select Market symbol for the ADSs

The ADSs

Each ADS represents ordinary shares. The ADSs may be evidenced by American depositary receipts, or ADRs.

The depositary will be the holder of the ordinary shares underlying the ADSs and you will have the rights of an ADS holder as set forth in the deposit agreement among us, the depositary and holders and beneficial owners of ADSs from time to time.

You may surrender your ADSs to the depositary to withdraw the ordinary shares underlying your ADSs. The depositary will charge you a fee for that surrender.

We may amend or terminate the deposit agreement for any reason without your consent. If an amendment becomes effective, you will be bound by the deposit agreement, as amended, if you continue to hold your ADSs.

See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our ADSs and this Offering” and “Description of the American Depositary Shares.”

Depositary

The Bank of New York Mellon

Tax considerations

See “United States and Luxembourg Income Tax Considerations.”

The number of ordinary shares that will be outstanding immediately after this offering is based on ordinary shares outstanding on June 30, 2010, plus the ordinary shares to be sold by us in the form of ADSs in this offering, and excludes the following ordinary shares:

•

ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted to our employees, directors, service providers and consultants outstanding at June 30, 2010 under the Skype Global S.à r.l. Equity Incentive Plan (the “Skype Equity Incentive Plan”) with an exercise price of $ per share;

•

ordinary shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted to our employees, directors, service providers and consultants after June 30, 2010 under the Skype Equity Incentive Plan with an exercise price of $ per share;

•

ordinary shares reserved for future issuance under the Skype Equity Incentive Plan; for a discussion of the Skype Equity Incentive Plan, see “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Components of Executive Compensation—Long-Term Equity Incentives”; and

•

ordinary shares into which warrants granted to Joltid Limited on November 19, 2009, which are now held by SEP Investments Pty Limited, may be exercised at an exercise price of $ per share (the warrants expire upon the earlier of November 19, 2019 and the occurrence of a reorganization event, as defined under the terms of the warrant). See “Capitalization—Warrants” for more information regarding the terms of the warrant.

Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, the information in this prospectus assumes:

•

no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase up to additional ADSs from the selling shareholders;

•

the completion of our corporate reorganization pursuant to which Skype Global S.à r.l. will become an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Skype S.A.; and

•

the adoption of our new articles of incorporation, which will occur prior to the closing of this offering.

Customer Allocation

We intend to make a portion of this offering available to our customers based on the nature and extent of their relationship with Skype. A Skype customer wishing to be considered for an allocation as a customer in the offering must have a brokerage account with an eligible broker and provide to the broker his or her Skype Name. Further details regarding customer participation will follow in a future prospectus.

Financial Overview

We believe that the growth and scale of our user base are primary drivers of our business. Our user base has grown rapidly since we were founded in 2003. From the three months ended June 30, 2009 to the three months ended June 30, 2010, we grew our average monthly connected users by 36%, from 91 million to 124 million.

The growth in our user base has translated into revenue growth. Our net revenues have historically been driven by the increasing use of our SkypeOut product, which enables Skype users to make low-priced calls to landlines and mobile devices on a pay-per-minute or subscription basis. Users of our paid communications services products, including SkypeOut, pay us in advance of their use of our products, and the growing popularity of our subscription-based products is providing us with more predictability of our future revenues.

Our primary costs associated with our net revenues are costs incurred by us to have SkypeOut calls connected, or “terminated,” on a landline or wireless network. As we have grown our business and entered into agreements with more telecommunications carriers to connect SkypeOut calls, we have been able to negotiate lower termination costs. As a result, cost of net revenues relating to our SkypeOut product has been increasing at a slower rate than our net revenues from the product, enabling us to improve our gross margin.

We believe our business is also characterized by low operating expenditures. In particular, our business and user communities benefit from network effects, whereby Skype products become more valuable as more people use them, thereby creating an incentive for existing users to encourage new users to join. As more users join and attract others, Skype creates more value for users, thereby increasing engagement. These positive network effects have helped us grow our user base and establish Skype as a well-recognized brand in Internet communication, without requiring us to make significant investments in sales and marketing activities.

Our relatively low capital expenditures are primarily due to the “peer-to-peer” architecture that enables our software platform and leverages the network resources of our users to connect them. This architecture provides us with a significant cost advantage because we are not required to build or maintain a physical communications network, such as a wire or fiber optic network or cellular infrastructure. As a result, we can add new users and provide them with a wide range of products at minimal incremental cost to us, allowing us to offer many of our products for free. Furthermore, we have relatively low cash tax expense, expressed as a percentage of our income or loss before income taxes.

Summary Financial Data

The following summary financial information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information,” our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and for the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009, the Predecessor period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009, as of and for the Predecessor year ended December 31, 2008 and for the Predecessor year ended December 31, 2007, as well as our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the six month Successor period ended June 30, 2010 and for the six month Predecessor period ended June 30, 2009, and their respective notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

On November 19, 2009, Skype Global acquired the Communications business segment of eBay, which consisted of the assets and liabilities of the Skype Companies (which we refer to as the “Skype Acquisition”). As a result of the Skype Acquisition, the financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been presented for the Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009, and for the Successor for the period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009.

In addition, on October 14, 2005, eBay acquired the Skype Companies (with the exception of Skype Holdings, which eBay formed to consummate the acquisition in 2005; one of the Skype Companies, Sonorit, which eBay acquired in April 2006; and certain indirect subsidiaries of Skype Global incorporated subsequent to the acquisition by eBay) (which we refer to as the “eBay Acquisition”). Accordingly, the summary financial results for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been presented for the pre-eBay predecessor entity (which we refer to as the “Pre-eBay Predecessor”) prior to the eBay Acquisition for the period from January 1, 2005 to October 13, 2005 and for the Predecessor following the eBay Acquisition for the period from October 14, 2005 to December 31, 2005.

Our summary statement of operations data and cash flows data for the Predecessor years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009 and for the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009, have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and are included elsewhere in this prospectus. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements to understand the basis of presentation of our consolidated financial statements during the Predecessor and Successor periods. The summary statement of operations data below for the Pre-eBay Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 to October 13, 2005, for the Predecessor period from October 14, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and for the Predecessor year ended December 31, 2006, are derived from unaudited financial statements that were prepared on the basis of U.S. GAAP. The summary statement of operations data below as of and for the six month Successor period ended June 30, 2010 and for the six month Predecessor period ended June 30, 2009 are unaudited and have been prepared under U.S. GAAP.

The Skype Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method and resulted in a new basis of accounting in the acquired Skype Companies. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair value at the acquisition date on November 19, 2009. The excess of purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities was recorded as goodwill (see Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus for further information). The vertical lines separating the Successor, Predecessor and Pre-eBay Predecessor financial data in this prospectus are included to highlight the lack of comparability between these accounts due to the period durations and new basis of accounting resulting from the Skype Acquisition and the eBay Acquisition, respectively.

For presentation purposes, we refer in this prospectus to the Predecessor’s combined financial statements and the Successor’s consolidated financial statements collectively as our “consolidated financial statements.”

Summary Statement of Operations Data from 2005 to 2009


	Pre-eBay Predecessor			Predecessor															Successor
	January 1 to October 13, 2005			October 14 to December 31, 2005			Year ended December 31, 2006			Year ended December 31, 2007			Year ended December 31, 2008			January 1 to November 18, 2009			November 19 to December 31, 2009
	(thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Summary Statement of Operations Data:
Net revenues:	$	47,076		$	24,809		$	193,696		$	381,551		$	551,364		$	626,458		$	92,445
Cost of net revenues⁽¹⁾		33,729			17,842			140,107			228,638			290,053			293,533			44,836	⁽²⁾

Gross profit		13,347			6,967			53,589			152,913			261,311			332,925			47,609

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing⁽¹⁾		14,200			13,097			59,787			67,195			85,630			111,029			17,267
Product development⁽¹⁾		5,027			6,536			38,900			22,078			31,124			34,993			5,809
General and administrative⁽¹⁾⁽³⁾		11,588			5,787			37,865			41,169			51,863			50,208			113,284	⁽⁴⁾
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		—			13,694			60,156			65,514			69,832			55,453			13,284	⁽²⁾
Litigation settlement		—			—			—			—			—			343,826	⁽⁵⁾		—
Impairment of goodwill		—			—			—			1,390,938	⁽⁶⁾		—			—			—

Total operating expenses		30,815			39,114			196,708			1,586,894			238,449			595,509			149,644

(Loss)/income from operations		(17,468	)		(32,147	)		(143,119	)		(1,433,981	)		22,862			(262,584	)		(102,035	)
Interest income and other (expense), net		272			493			2,029			5,303			10,297			(2,549	)		5,492
Interest expense		—			—			—			—			—			—			(10,387	)⁽⁷⁾

(Loss)/income before income taxes		(17,196	)		(31,654	)		(141,090	)		(1,428,678	)		33,159			(265,133	)		(106,930	)
Income tax (benefit)/expense		1,141			(2,380	)		(22,044	)		(23,342	)		(8,447	)		3,950			(7,209	)

Net income (loss)	$	(18,337	)	$	(29,274	)	$	(119,046	)	$	(1,405,336	)	$	41,606		$	(269,083	)	$	(99,721	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share (Class A through J):⁽⁸⁾																			$	(10.59	)
Weighted number of shares, basic and diluted (Class A through J):⁽⁸⁾																				9,414,600

⁽¹⁾	Figures for the periods shown below include stock-based compensation expense as follows:


	Pre-eBay Predecessor		Predecessor											Successor
	January 1 to October 13, 2005		October 14 to December 31, 2005		Year ended December 31, 2006		Year ended December 31, 2007		Year ended December 31, 2008			January 1 to November 18, 2009		November 19 to December 31, 2009
	(thousands of U.S. dollars)
Cost of net revenues	$	—	$	—	$	2,141	$	200	$	(145	)	$	331	$	6
Sales and marketing		2,897		7,681		10,247		1,953		4,570			8,564		111
Product development		4,024		4,658		13,303		3,883		5,443			2,910		92
General and administrative		1,561		2,980		7,378		4,233		2,958			2,680		52

Total	$	8,482	$	15,319	$	33,069	$	10,269	$	12,826		$	14,485	$	261

⁽²⁾

Cost of net revenues and amortization of acquired intangible assets for the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009 include $4.2 million and $13.3 million of amortization costs, respectively, relating to the amortization of the intangible assets acquired in the Skype Acquisition. The increase from the Predecessor period is a result of the Skype Acquisition, whereby the gross carrying amount of intangible assets increased from $340.5 million as of December 31, 2008 to $805.6 million as of December 31, 2009.

⁽³⁾	The consummation of this offering will trigger payments under management services agreements entered into in connection with the Skype Acquisition in aggregate amount of $ million. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Management Service Agreements.”

⁽⁴⁾	This amount includes $98.7 million of transaction fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Skype Acquisition.

⁽⁵⁾

This amount represents the net charge incurred by us in connection with the settlement that we and eBay reached with Joltid regarding our use of the “Global Index” technology that facilitates communications in the peer-to-peer network of Skype users. For more information regarding this settlement and the Joltid Transaction generally, please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Results of Operations,” “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Acquisition-Related Matters—The Joltid Transaction” and Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

⁽⁶⁾

This amount represents the impairment in 2007 of the goodwill recorded in connection with our acquisition by eBay in 2005. As a result of the assessment in 2007 that the carrying value of that goodwill exceeded its fair value, an impairment charge of $1.4 billion was recorded. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Results of Operations—Impairment of Goodwill” and Note 4 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

⁽⁷⁾

This amount represents the net interest expense, including amortization of original issuance discount and deferred financing cost, incurred for the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009 in connection with the indebtedness incurred to finance the Skype Acquisition, as described further under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

⁽⁸⁾

Per share information is not provided for the Predecessor periods from October 14, 2005 to November 18, 2009 because the Predecessor financial statements have been prepared on a combined basis and have an equity structure reflecting eBay’s net investment in the Skype Companies. In addition, we have not provided per share information for the Pre-eBay Predecessor period as the information does not provide a meaningful comparison to the operations of the entity subsequent to the eBay Acquisition in 2005 or the Skype Acquisition in 2009.

Summary Statement of Operations Data for the Six Month Successor Period ended June 30, 2010 and the Six Month Predecessor Period ended June 30, 2009

Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be achieved for the entire year.


	Predecessor			Successor
	Six months ended June 30, 2009			Six months ended June 30, 2010
	(thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Net revenues:	$	324,838		$	406,170
Cost of net revenues⁽¹⁾		161,138			199,820	⁽²⁾

Gross profit		163,700			206,350
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing⁽¹⁾		57,343			70,998
Product development⁽¹⁾		20,549			29,950
General and administrative⁽¹⁾		23,681			46,824
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		31,147			57,154	⁽²⁾

Total operating expenses		132,720			204,926
Income (loss) from operations		30,980			1,424
Realized loss on amended credit agreement		—			(13,513	)⁽³⁾
Interest income and other (expense), net		(6,119	)		31,330
Interest expense		—			(35,606	)⁽⁴⁾

(Loss)/income before income taxes		24,861			(16,365	)
Income tax expense / (benefit)		2,327			(29,486	)

Net income	$	22,534		$	13,121

Basic and diluted net income per share (Class A through I):⁽⁵⁾				$	—
Basic and diluted net income per share (Class J):⁽⁵⁾				$	13.88
Weighted number of shares, basic and diluted (Class A through I):⁽⁵⁾					8,486,873
Weighted number of shares, basic and diluted (Class J):⁽⁵⁾					942,986

⁽¹⁾	Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows:


	Predecessor		Successor
	Six months ended June 30, 2009		Six months ended June 30, 2010
	(thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Cost of net revenues	$	369	$	51
Sales and marketing		3,705		1,722
Product development		3,309		813
General and administrative		1,453		495

Total	$	8,836	$	3,081

⁽²⁾

Cost of net revenues and amortization of acquired intangible assets for the Successor six months ended June 30, 2010 include $18.1 million and $57.2 million of amortization costs, respectively, relating to the amortization of the intangible assets acquired in the Skype Acquisition. The increase from the comparable period in 2009 is a result of the Skype Acquisition, whereby the gross carrying amount of intangible assets increased from $340.5 million as of December 31, 2008 to $805.6 million as of December 31, 2009.

⁽³⁾	This amount represents the expense incurred in connection with the amendment of our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement in February 2010, described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

⁽⁴⁾

This amount represents the net interest expense, including amortization of original issuance discount and deferred financing cost, incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2010 in connection with the outstanding indebtedness incurred to finance the Skype Acquisition, described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

⁽⁵⁾	Per share information is not provided for the Predecessor six months ended June 30, 2009 because the Predecessor financial statements have been prepared on a combined basis and have an equity structure reflecting eBay’s net investment in the Skype Companies.

Summary Balance Sheet Data

Our consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010 is presented:

•

on an actual basis; and

•

on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the sale of ADSs by us in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, the payment of approximately $ million to certain of our shareholders upon the consummation of this offer in connection with the termination of our management service agreements with them, and the application of such net proceeds as described under “Use of Proceeds.”


	As of June 30, 2010
	Actual			As adjusted⁽¹⁾
	(thousands of U.S. dollars)
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	85,493
Total current assets		182,586
Property and equipment, net		19,252
Goodwill		2,372,779	⁽²⁾
Intangible assets, net		712,903	⁽³⁾
Total assets		3,312,817

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		99,548
Deferred revenue and user advances		150,250
Total current liabilities		317,272
Long term debt		690,107	⁽⁴⁾
Total liabilities		1,058,463
Total shareholders’ equity		2,254,354
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	3,312,817

⁽¹⁾

Each $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per share, the midpoint of the range reflected on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase or decrease, as applicable, our cash and cash equivalents, total current assets, total assets, total shareholders’ equity and total liabilities and shareholders’ equity by approximately $ million, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

⁽²⁾	This amount represents the excess of purchase price over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities in the Skype Acquisition, which has been recorded as goodwill.

⁽³⁾

This amount represents the identifiable intangible assets acquired in connection with the Skype Acquisition and the Joltid Transaction. As a result of the Skype Acquisition, the gross carrying amount of intangible assets increased from $340.5 million as of December 31, 2008 to $805.6 million as of June 30, 2010.

⁽⁴⁾	This amount represents the outstanding amount as of June 30, 2010 of long-term debt incurred to finance the Skype Acquisition, as described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Indebtedness.”

Summary Cash Flow Data


	Predecessor									Successor			Predecessor			Successor
	Year ended December 31, 2007			Year ended December 31, 2008			January 1 to November 18, 2009			November 19 to December 31, 2009			Six months ended June 30, 2009			Six months ended June 30, 2010
	(thousands of U.S. dollars)
Summary Cash Flow Data:
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:	$	80,220		$	148,801		$	128,049		$	(150,913	)⁽²⁾	$	93,976		$	64,830
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities:		(536,020	)⁽¹⁾		(4,964	)		(11,733	)		(1,958,981	)⁽³⁾		(5,264	)		(12,869	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities:		468,354	⁽¹⁾		13,305			(263,302	)		2,082,013	⁽⁴⁾		—			(67,234	)⁽⁵⁾

⁽¹⁾

This amount primarily reflected a $530.3 million cash payment by eBay pursuant to an earn-out settlement agreement with certain former shareholders of the Pre-eBay Predecessor and the earn-out representative. Financing activities to finance this payment resulted in a corresponding increase in net cash provided by financing activities.

⁽²⁾

This amount was impacted by outgoing cash payments of $94.4 million in connection with the Joltid litigation settlement as part of the Joltid Transaction. For more information see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Acquisition-Related Matters—The Joltid Transaction” and Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition, net cash of $98.7 million was also paid as fees and expenses in connection with the Skype Acquisition.

⁽³⁾	This amount includes $1.9 billion in cash paid to eBay as a portion of the consideration in the Skype Acquisition. In addition, $34.6 million was paid to acquire intangible assets as part of the Joltid Transaction we entered into prior to the Skype Acquisition.

⁽⁴⁾	This amount includes $681.7 million net proceeds from indebtedness incurred in connection with the Skype Acquisition and $1.4 billion in net cash proceeds from the issuance of common stock in the Skype Acquisition.

⁽⁵⁾	This amount primarily reflects the refinancing of our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement and the contemporaneous repayment of the entire $125.0 million outstanding payment-in-kind loan agreement with eBay.

Key Metrics

We monitor certain key operating metrics that we believe drive our financial performance, including net revenues, and that we use to measure usage during different periods of the year to manage our business and to help identify potential fraudulent activities. These metrics are derived from our operational systems, as opposed to our financial reporting systems. As our business evolves and we continue to gain further insight into our growing business, we may change the method of calculating our key operating metrics, enhance our operational systems to address uncertainties in these metrics or add new key operating metrics to reflect the changes in our business.

Our registered user metric is subject to a degree of overstatement. Other metrics are subject to uncertainties and inaccuracies and may be overstated or understated. For more information, see “Risk Factors—The number of our registered users overstates the number of unique individuals who register to use our products,” “—Our connected users metric is subject to uncertainties and may overstate the number of users who actively use our products” and “—Our paying user and communications services billing minutes metrics are subject to a degree of inaccuracy due to fraudulent transactions and our method of calculating these metrics.”

For details of how we calculate each of these metrics, as well as certain key assumptions relating to these metrics, see “Selected Financial Data—Key Metrics.”


	As of or for the three months ended, as applicable,
	December 31, 2007	December 31, 2008	December 31, 2009	June 30, 2009	June 30, 2010
	(millions)
Registered users⁽¹⁾	217	325	474	397	560
Average monthly connected users⁽²⁾	52	75	105	91	124
Average monthly paying users	4.6	5.8	7.3	6.6	8.1

⁽¹⁾

Our registered users number as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 includes 3 million, 17 million and 20 million, and as of June 30, 2009 and 2010 includes 19 million and 20 million users, respectively, who registered through their MySpace account. We believe that MySpace registered users are infrequent users of Skype products. We have notified MySpace that we do not intend to renew the contract, through which users can register through MySpace, when it expires on November 27, 2010. The registered users number in the table above excludes users that have registered on Skype through our investment to address the Chinese market, Tel-Online Limited; the number of users that registered through Tel-Online Limited amounted to 59 million, 80 million and 86 million as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and 83 million and 88 million users as of June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

⁽²⁾

Our average monthly connected users number for the three months ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 includes 1 million, 4 million and 2 million, and for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 includes 3 million and 1 million users, respectively, who registered through their MySpace account. We believe that MySpace connected users are infrequent users of Skype products. We have notified MySpace that we do not intend to renew the contract, through which users can register and connect through MySpace, when it expires on November 27, 2010. The average monthly connected users number in the table above excludes users that have connected to Skype through our investment to address the Chinese market, Tel-Online Limited; the average monthly connected users that connected through Tel-Online Limited amounted to 4 million, 3 million and 2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, and 2 million users for both the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010.

The table below shows average communications services revenue per paying user, which represents our net revenues derived from our communications services products for the relevant period divided by the average paying users for such period:


	For the year ended December 31,						ANNUALIZED,⁽¹⁾ based on data for the six months ended June 30,
	2007		2008		2009		2009		2010
	(U.S. dollars)
Average communications services revenue per paying user	$	81	$	102	$	98	$	94	$	96

⁽¹⁾	For purposes of comparison on an annual basis, the average communications services revenue per paying user for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 has been converted into annualized figures for the years 2009 and 2010 based on the six month net revenues in those years.

The table below shows our communications services billing minutes and Skype-to-Skype minutes for each of the periods presented:



	For the year ended December 31,			For the six months ended,
	2007	2008	2009	June 30, 2009	June 30, 2010
	(billions)
Communications services billing minutes	4.1	6.9	10.7	5.0	6.4
Skype-to-Skype minutes	43.4	65.5	113.0	49.1	88.4

Adjusted EBITDA

To supplement our consolidated financial statements which are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we use Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP performance measure. We present Adjusted EBITDA because it is used by our board of directors and management to evaluate our operating performance, and we consider it an important supplemental measure of our performance. Adjusted EBITDA, as we present it, represents net income before income tax (benefit)/expense, interest expense, interest income and other (expense), net, depreciation and amortization, further adjusted for the following additional items:

•

Stock-based compensation expense;

•

Impairment of goodwill;

•

Realized loss upon amendment of our Five Year Credit Agreement;

•

Costs we incurred as a result of the Skype Acquisition, such as external transaction costs, payments under management services agreements with shareholders of Skype, transition services agreement costs payable to eBay and cash bonuses to certain Skype employees;

•

Litigation settlement costs;

•

Separation cost incurred subsequent to the Skype Acquisition; and

•

Foreign exchange gains and losses prior to invoice receipt.

Adjusted EBITDA is not in accordance with, or an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, this non-GAAP measure is not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. As a non-GAAP measure, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In particular:

•

Unless reconciled to our pro forma net income, Adjusted EBITDA is not a pro forma measure, nor does it purport to represent what our consolidated results of operations would have been had the Skype Acquisition not occurred or occurred on a different date;

•

Adjusted EBITDA is not indicative of our future consolidated results of operations;

•

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures;

•

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt;

•

Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect our tax expense; and

•

Others may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do and these calculations may not be comparable to our Adjusted EBITDA metric.

The following table reconciles our Adjusted EBITDA for the Predecessor years 2007, 2008, for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009, the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009, the pro forma year 2009, and each of the six months ended June 30, 2009 (Predecessor and pro forma) and 2010 to the nearest U.S. GAAP performance measure, which is net income (loss):


	Year ended December 31,						Predecessor Jan 1 – Nov. 18, 2009		Successor Nov. 19 – Dec. 31, 2009		Six months ended June 30,
	Predecessor 2007		Predecessor 2008		Pro forma 2009⁽¹⁾		Predecessor Jan 1 – Nov. 18, 2009		Successor Nov. 19 – Dec. 31, 2009		Predecessor 2009	Pro forma 2009⁽¹⁾		Successor 2010
	(thousands of U.S. dollars)
Net (loss)/income	(1,405,336	)	41,606		(417,547	)	(269,083	)	(99,721	)	22,534	(46,440	)	13,121
Income tax (benefit)/ expense	(23,342	)	(8,447	)	(21,398	)	3,950		(7,209	)	2,327	(24,380	)	(29,486	)
Interest expense	—		—		89,643		—		10,387		—	44,527		35,606
Interest income and other expense, net	(5,303	)	(10,297	)	(2,942	)	2,549		(5,492	)	6,119	6,119		(31,330	)
Depreciation and amortization	73,303		75,534		156,543		60,649		18,400		33,571	77,639		79,234
Stock-based compensation	10,269		12,826		14,746		14,485		261		8,836	8,836		3,081
Impairment of goodwill	1,390,938		—		—		—		—		—	—		—
Realized loss on credit agreement	—		—		—		—		—		—	—		13,513
Management Services Agreements with shareholders⁽²⁾	—		—		14,177		—		1,685		—	7,086		7,294
Skype Acquisition transaction fees⁽³⁾	—		—		—		—		98,715		—	—		—
Skype Acquisition transaction bonuses⁽⁴⁾	—		—		—		3,647		—		—	—		—
Transition Services Agreement⁽⁵⁾	—		—		1,118				1,118		—	—		2,111
Excluded bonus⁽⁶⁾	—		—		1,755		144		1,611		—	—		6,107
Joltid litigation settlement⁽⁷⁾	—		—		343,826		343,826		—		—	—		—
Other litigation settlements⁽⁸⁾	—		(410	)	2,928		2,928		—		—	—		(784	)
Separation costs⁽⁹⁾	—		—		2,054		873		1,181		—	—		5,166
Foreign exchange gains and losses prior to invoice receipt⁽¹⁰⁾	—		(334	)	(8	)	(1,140	)	1,132		1,849	1,849		12,118

Adjusted EBITDA	40,529		110,478		184,895		162,828		22,068		75,236	75,236		115,751

⁽¹⁾	See “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information” and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus to understand how pro forma net income was computed.

⁽²⁾

In connection with the Skype Acquisition, we entered into management service agreements with certain of our shareholders and their affiliates, which provide for the payment of periodic monitoring fees for management, financial, consulting and other advisory services provided by them to us after completion of the Skype Acquisition. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Management Services Agreements.”

⁽³⁾	This amount represents the external transaction fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Skype Acquisition.

⁽⁴⁾	This amount represents cash bonus payments to certain Skype executives that vested upon the completion of the Skype Acquisition.

⁽⁵⁾

Our indirect subsidiary, Skype Technologies S.A., entered into a transition services agreement with eBay pursuant to which eBay has agreed to provide us certain transition services in connection with the conduct of our business. The initial term is one year from the date of the Skype Acquisition, except for customer service applications support, the term for which was six months. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Acquisition-Related Matters—The Skype Acquisition and Ancillary Agreements—Transition Services Agreement.”

⁽⁶⁾

In conjunction with the Skype Acquisition, a special cash pool was funded to reward eligible Skype employees. Employees are eligible to receive a bonus based on continued employment that will vest on the one-year anniversary of the Skype Acquisition. The total estimated value of the awards to be granted and funded is $ 10.0 million and was recorded as an asset in the opening balance sheet of the Skype Companies and is being amortized as compensation expense based on the actual value of the award that is estimated to vest. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Acquisition-Related Matters—The Skype Acquisition and Ancillary Agreements—Cash Pool.” In addition, certain employees are eligible for bonus payments that will vest prior to or on one-year anniversary of the Skype Acquisition based on the successful achievement of certain strategic initiatives outlined by the Company in conjunction with our separation from eBay.

⁽⁷⁾

This amount represents the net charge incurred by us in connection with the settlement by us and eBay of a dispute with Joltid over our use of peer-to-peer communication technology. For more information about the Joltid Transaction, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Results of Operations”, “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Acquisition-Related Matters—The Joltid Transaction” and Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

⁽⁸⁾	Reflects additional losses or (gains) we recorded related to litigation settlements other than the Joltid Transaction discussed above. See “Business—Legal Proceedings” for a discussion of other legal and regulatory proceedings, disputes and regulatory inquiries related to our business.

⁽⁹⁾

Separation costs primarily relate to external service provider fees for strategic projects aimed at building processes for scaling the Company subsequent to the Skype Acquisition, establishing new employee benefit structures and compensation programs and planning for the implementation of our stand alone IT infrastructure, as well as tax, legal and other consulting fees related to our separation from eBay.

An investment in our ordinary shares or ADSs involves a high degree of risk. Before making an investment in our ordinary shares or ADSs, you should carefully consider the following risks, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus. Any of the risks described below and elsewhere in this prospectus could materially harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial could also materially harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. As a result, the trading price of our ordinary shares or ADSs could decline, and you may lose part or all of your investment.

Although our net revenues have increased substantially over the last few years, we may not be able to maintain historical rates of net revenue growth. We believe that our continued growth will depend, among other factors, on our ability to:

However, we cannot assure you that we will successfully implement any of these steps.

We reported net income of $13.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a net loss of $269.1 million in the period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009, a net loss of $99.7 million in the period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009, a pro forma net loss of $417.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2009 (including litigation settlement expenses in the net amount of $343.8 million incurred in connection with the Joltid Transaction and excluding expenses of $98.7 million related to the Skype Acquisition), net income of $41.6 million in 2008 and a net loss of $1.4 billion (including a goodwill impairment charge of $1.4 billion) in 2007. We reported an accumulated deficit of $86.6 million as of June 30, 2010. We may incur net losses again and cannot assure you that we will be profitable in the future or that, if we are, we will be able to maintain profitability. We believe that our profitability will depend, among other factors, on our ability to:

The rate at which we add registered, connected and paying users may decline. In addition, we may fail to successfully convert connected users into paying users.

In 2009, 149 million new users registered a Skype username, and we grew our average monthly connected users by 30 million users for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. See, however, “—The number of our registered users overstates the number of unique individuals who register to use our products” and “—Our connected user metric is subject to uncertainties and may overstate the number of users who actively use our products.” We may fail to attract new registered users at an equivalent rate in the future. Furthermore, we lose connected users in the ordinary course of business. As a result, we need to acquire new connected users on an ongoing basis just to maintain our existing level of connected users. We must also convert connected users into paying users. If we are unable to attract new registered users, retain them as connected users and convert non-paying users into paying users, our business, results of operations and financial position will suffer.

Our operating results may fluctuate. As a result, we may have difficulty forecasting net revenues and planning expenditures to support development of our operations. Fluctuations in our operating results may cause us to fail to meet or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which could cause the market price of our ADSs to decline.

Our operating results have varied on a quarterly basis during our operating history. Our operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control, including:

Furthermore, it is difficult for us to forecast the level of our net revenues and gross margin. In view of the rapidly evolving nature of our business and our limited operating history, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful, and you should not rely upon them as an indication of future performance. Due to, among other things, our short operating history and the inherent difficulty in forecasting net revenues, it is also difficult to forecast expenses as a percentage of net revenues. Quarterly and annual expenses as a percentage of net revenues may be significantly different from historical or projected rates. In addition, our gross margin is difficult to predict due to changes in usage patterns, potential future sources of additional net revenues and future arrangements with third parties, which may include revenue sharing or other alternative pricing models.

In part as a result of the fluctuation in our results and uncertainty of our forecasts, our operating results in one or more future quarters may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. In that event, the trading price of our ADSs would almost certainly decline. In addition, fluctuations in our operating results may also make it more difficult for securities analysts and investors to assess the longer-term prospects and strength of our business at any particular point, which could lead to increased volatility in the price of our ADSs. Increased volatility could cause the price of our ADSs to suffer in comparison to less volatile investments.

We generate net revenues almost entirely from the use of our paid communications services products.

Many of our products are free. As a result, we have generated nearly all of our historical revenues from our paid communications services products, which are purchased by a small minority of our users. During the three

months ended June 30, 2010, we generated on average net revenues from calls made by approximately 8.1 million paying users to landline or mobile phones. These paying users represented less than 7% of our average connected users during this period. If even a small percentage of our paying users cease paying for our products, this could have a significant impact on our net revenues.

In addition, we have historically derived a substantial portion of our net revenues from a single product—SkypeOut. For the pro forma year ended December 31, 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2010, 86% and 87% of our pro forma net revenues and net revenues, respectively, were derived from the use of SkypeOut. Due to this dependence on SkypeOut as our primary source of net revenues, we are subject to an elevated risk of reduced demand for our SkypeOut product.

Our other sources of net revenues, including our Skype for Business products and marketing services and licensing, are currently limited. We may face challenges as we seek to expand our sources of revenue. For example, the current version of our software does not include functionality to allow industry standard-sized advertisements to be delivered to our users via the Skype software client. Furthermore, even if certain versions of the Skype software client were able to deliver advertisements, we may face difficulty in successfully implementing advertising on certain platforms, such as mobile devices. Finally, our users may respond negatively to receiving advertisements through their Skype software client, which could negatively and materially affect user engagement, our Skype brand and our results of operations.

We have a short operating history and a relatively new business in an emerging and rapidly evolving market. This makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects, may increase the risk that we will not continue to be successful and increases the risk of your investment.

We have a short operating history with our communications services products, which were developed in connection with our launch in 2003. As a result, we have very little operating history for you to evaluate in assessing our future prospects. Also, we derive nearly all of our net revenues from Internet communications, which is a new industry that has undergone rapid and dramatic changes in its short history and is subject to significant challenges. We have expanded our headcount, facilities and infrastructure, including since the Skype Acquisition, and we anticipate that further expansion in certain areas will be required for us to operate as an independent public company and for the development of some of our businesses. For example, our number of employees and contractors increased from 640 people as of June 30, 2009 to 839 people as of June 30, 2010. This expansion has placed, and we expect it will continue to place, a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources. You must consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we will encounter as an early-stage company in a new and rapidly evolving market. We may not be able to address successfully these risks and difficulties, which could materially harm our business and operating results and reduce the price of our ADSs.

Goodwill and intangible asset impairment analysis may result in charges, which may be significant.

U.S. GAAP requires us to conduct an impairment analysis of our goodwill annually and at such other times when an event or change in circumstances occurs that would indicate potential impairment. We are also required to evaluate finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these intangible assets may not be recoverable. Our limited operating history increases the risk of differences between projected and actual performance, which could substantially impact our future estimates of recoverability and fair value. In 2007, our results of operations were adversely affected by a charge of $1.4 billion for the impairment of goodwill. The impairment charge was determined by comparing the carrying value of goodwill in eBay’s Communications reporting unit with the implied fair value of the goodwill. Following the Skype Acquisition in 2009, we recorded the excess of the purchase price over tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets and assumed liabilities in the amount of $2.4 billion as goodwill, which is substantially higher than the goodwill in our Predecessor period financial statements. We may be required to write down the carrying value of goodwill based on the value of our business in the future. If we conclude that

there is significant impairment of our goodwill as a result of any impairment analysis, we would be required to record corresponding non-cash impairment charges, which could negatively and materially affect our operating results and the market price of our ADSs.

The number of our registered users overstates the number of unique individuals who register to use our products.

We calculate registered users as the cumulative number of user accounts at the end of the relevant period. The actual number of registered users however is likely to be lower, potentially significantly, for two primary reasons. First, some legitimate users may register more than once and therefore have more than one account. For example, a user who has lost his or her original Skype Name or password may simply register again and create an additional account, or a user may create separate accounts for business and personal use. Second, we experience irregular registration activities, some of which we believe are the result of fraudulent activities that involve the creation of a significant number of spurious user accounts. See “—Failure to deal effectively with fraudulent transactions would increase our loss rate, could increase expenses, result in the loss of our ability to accept certain credit cards and harm our business.” The actual number of registered users includes users who we actively block from using our services due to our concerns of those users engaging in fraudulent activities. We do not validate information provided during the registration process and thus registration is not prohibited, even when we have indication that such user may engage in fraudulent activity. Instead, we limit the connection to our services of such registered users.

In addition, as of June 30, 2010, the number of registered users includes 20 million users who registered through their MySpace account. Such registration occurred automatically as part of the MySpace registration process, and as a result, the number of our registered users may overstate the number of users who actively decided to create a Skype account. We believe that users that have registered through MySpace are infrequent users of Skype products.

Our connected users metric is subject to uncertainties and may overstate the number of users who actively use our products.

We calculate connected users as the number of user accounts, averaged over a three month period, that log in to the Skype software client, either manually or automatically, in a given calendar month. We also include in connected users the number of users, averaged over a three month period, who have a valid Skype software certificate (for example, a mobile phone with the Skype software client installed) that is checked and has been validated during the past thirty days.

The number of connected users is subject to uncertainties and in some ways may overstate the number of users actively using our products during a given period. For example, for a number of our users, once a user has downloaded our software onto their device, the software will automatically be logged in to when the device is turned on, even if the customer takes no steps to affirmatively engage our software client after initial registration. In addition, the number of connected users also includes, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, one million users who connected during such period primarily as a result of signing into their MySpace account and who we believe are infrequent users of Skype products. We have notified MySpace that we do not intend to renew our contract arrangement with MySpace, through which users can register through MySpace, when it expires on November 27, 2010. It is currently uncertain whether users that connected to Skype through MySpace will continue to do so following the expiry of this contract.

Furthermore, a number of connected users in a given period includes the creation and use of spurious user accounts, because we count a new registered user as a connected user in the month of registration. While we have taken and will seek to continue to take steps, such as by requiring additional authentication steps, to reduce the ability of fictitious users to connect to the different versions of the Skype software client, and to prevent users from connecting to our system more than once, we cannot assure you that these measures will be effective in reducing the number of fictitious users or users who have connected more than once.

Our connected user metric is also subject to uncertainties because, in some cases, it can underestimate the number of users actively using our products during a given period. For example, users accessing Skype from behind a firewall may not be captured in our systems as connected users.

As a result, there is a degree of uncertainty in this metric because it can be influenced by different factors in the same period, sometimes with opposite effects.

Our paying user and communications services products billing minutes metrics are subject to a degree of inaccuracy due to fraudulent transactions and our method of calculating these metrics.

We calculate paying users as the number of unique user accounts, averaged over a three month period, who make a successful SkypeOut call using Skype credit on a pay-as-you-go basis in a given calendar month or who had an active subscription at any time during such calendar month. We calculate communications services billing minutes as the cumulative number of minutes that Skype users were connected to our communications services products, which mainly comprise billing minutes related to SkypeOut calls to traditional fixed-line or mobile telephones during a relevant period. A user need not be logged into the Skype software client to be considered as having made a successful SkypeOut call or to register a billing minute; for example, the user may make a Skype-to-Go call or use Call Forwarding, which do not require users to log into the Skype software client themselves.

With respect to both the number of paying users and the number of communications services billing minutes, these metrics include users paying for our products and the billing minutes generated through fraudulent activities, such as stolen credit cards. Therefore, for any given month, in particular if we have been subject to a particular spike in fraudulent activity during that period, our paying user and communications services billing minutes may not accurately reflect the genuine number of paying users and communications services billing minutes during that period. See “—Failure to deal effectively with fraudulent transactions would increase our loss rate, could increase expenses, result in the loss of our ability to accept certain credit cards and harm our business.”

These metrics are also subject to a degree of inaccuracy for other reasons. These metrics are derived from our operational systems, not our financial systems, and we have identified certain instances in the past whereby these systems have not always accurately captured the number of paying users and communications services billing minutes. With respect to paying users, we seek to eliminate from our number of paying users any users who only made SkypeOut calls utilizing promotional, free Skype credit or promotional subscriptions services. With respect to communications services billing minutes, we seek to eliminate from this number minutes attributable to SkypeOut calls made utilizing promotional, free Skype credit or promotional subscriptions services, or other free calls. In both cases, our operational systems may fail to classify properly these users and minutes, and accordingly these metrics are subject to potential inaccuracies.

The peer-to-peer nature of our software architecture makes it difficult to determine certain operational metrics.

Because our software operates through a peer-to-peer architecture, it is difficult for us to determine with accuracy certain operational metrics with respect to non-paid products, such as free calling minutes or the percentage of calls including certain features like video. As a result, these metrics are intended as estimates only and may not be accurate. Due to the uncertainty surrounding these operational metrics, we may not take the most appropriate decisions for our business and operations or allocate our financial resources in an optimal manner.

Our industry is intensely competitive and if we do not compete successfully, we could lose market share, experience reduced revenues or suffer losses.

The market for our products is intensely competitive and characterized by rapid technological change, and we expect competition to intensify significantly in the future. In particular, some of our competitors have taken steps or may decide to more aggressively compete against us.

Our competitors include a variety of communication service and product providers, including Internet product and software companies, telecommunications companies and hardware-based voice over Internet protocol providers and, potentially, small and medium-size enterprise telecommunications services providers. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than we are and have substantially longer operating histories and substantially greater product development and marketing budgets and financial, human and other resources than we do. Some also have greater name and brand recognition and a larger base of customers or users than we have. They may be able to devote greater resources to develop, promote, and sell their products and to respond quickly to new technologies and changing consumer behavior. We may also face a disadvantage because we do not currently offer email, a product that is offered by many of our competitors. Our ability to compete successfully depends on our ability to achieve continual technological innovation and adapt to the evolving needs of our customers, but we cannot assure you that we will be successful in this regard.

One particular risk we face is that some of our competitors, particularly large incumbent telephone companies with significant financial resources, may attempt to gain significant market share from us by offering their communications products for free or at prices at or below the prices we charge, which would have a material adverse effect on our business. These and other competitors may elect to commence or intensify these forms of price competition at any time, including shortly after we complete this offering and, because many of these competitors have alternative sources of revenue, they may be able to sustain this price competition indefinitely. In addition, we expect our various communications competitors to continue to improve the performance of their current products and introduce new communications products, software, services and technologies. Some of our competitors have the ability to restrict or increase the price of access to our products and have done so. For example, in Germany, T-Mobile announced in April 2009 that it was blocking VoIP communications over its mobile network, and in June 2009 it introduced a fixed monthly fee for the option of using VoIP on its network. Many of our competitors offer email as part of their communications solution. We do not offer email, which may harm our ability to compete. If we are unable to compete effectively, our growth and ability to sell products at profitable margins could be materially and adversely affected. Going forward, as we enhance our communications product offerings, we may enter new markets and face competition from other companies.

In certain countries, companies with which we compete may be government owned, sponsored or supported, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage. For example, governments in these countries may require us to be regulated or may determine not to provide us with a necessary license. In addition, government owned, sponsored or supported companies may be able to obtain financing on terms more favorable than terms available to private companies such as us.

We are subject to proceedings that may jeopardize our exclusive use of the Skype brand.

We regard our brand as one of our most valuable assets. The unlicensed use of our brand by third parties could harm our reputation, cause confusion among our users, and severely undermine the value of our brand in the marketplace. In that regard, we have registered and are in the process of applying to register the “Skype” name and other related marks as trademarks and service marks in various jurisdictions. In the European Union and several other countries, some of our applications have received objections from the applicable trademark agency or have been opposed by third parties. In particular, in the European Union, India, Norway and Brazil, our applications in respect of the Skype name are being opposed by BSkyB plc., a British satellite broadcaster, Internet service and telephony service provider, or by one of its affiliates. These oppositions are based on BSkyB’s claimed rights with respect to the mark “SKY.” To date, we have successfully defended these oppositions in Switzerland and Turkey and to date have received a positive decision in Brazil. However, on

July 6, 2010, we received a negative first instance decision from the European Union trademark registry (OHIM) on BSkyB’s opposition proceeding against the Skype bubble logo trademark application. We intend to appeal this decision by submitting a notice of appeal to the OHIM Board of Appeal, and if necessary to the General Court at the Court of Justice of the European Community. If these oppositions to our application for trademark registration are ultimately successful, it will be more difficult for us to prevent third parties from using the Skype brand without our permission, which may have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, a successful opposition to our application in one or more countries might encourage BSkyB or other third parties to make additional oppositions or commence trademark infringement proceedings.

In addition, if BSkyB or other third parties were to pursue litigation to prevent our use of the Skype name or logo, defending against that litigation could be costly and time consuming even if we were ultimately to prevail. If we were not ultimately to prevail in any such litigation to prevent our use of the Skype name or logo, we could be precluded from using the Skype name or logo in one or more jurisdictions without obtaining a license from BSkyB or such other third parties, which license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

In certain countries, such as China, Russia, Brazil and Indonesia, certain third parties have applied for and in some cases have been granted trademarks that are identical or similar to ours and, in certain instances, like in China, our trademark applications have faced preliminary refusals because there has been a third-party trademark application submitted prior to our application. In most cases, we are requesting a review of these preliminary refusals and are opposing and pursuing cancellation actions against those third-party trademarks and trademark applications. The loss, limitation or refusal of trademark protection for our brand in any jurisdiction could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our business is heavily reliant upon the quality of our products, which in turn are dependent on the underlying software and related technology, including communications technology. By its nature, software and related technology is heavily reliant on intellectual property including patents and trade secrets. Third parties have from time to time claimed, and it is likely that others will claim in the future, that we and/or our distributors or commercial partners have infringed their patents or other intellectual property rights. The application of patent law to the software industry is particularly uncertain because the time that it takes for a software-related patent to issue is typically lengthy, which increases the likelihood of pending patent applications claiming inventions whose priority dates may pre-date development of our own proprietary software. We are subject to patent disputes, and expect that we will increasingly be subject to patent infringement claims as our products and distribution model expand in market share, scope and complexity.

Intellectual property claims against us, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and costly to resolve, could divert management attention and financial resources away from our daily business, could require changes in our methods of doing business or our products, could require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements or to make substantial payments to settle claims or satisfy judgments, and could require us to cease conducting certain operations or offering certain products in certain areas or generally. We do not conduct comprehensive patent searches to determine whether the technologies used in our products infringe upon patents held by others. In addition, product development is inherently uncertain in a rapidly evolving technological environment in which there may be numerous patent applications pending, many of which are confidential when filed, with regard to similar technologies. While we believe that our products do not infringe in any material respect upon intellectual property rights of third parties, we cannot be certain that this is the case. In addition, in any potential dispute involving our patents or other intellectual property, our customers and distributors could also become the target of litigation. We have certain contractual obligations to indemnify our customers, distributors and commercial partners for liability that they may incur based on third party claims of intellectual property infringement for the use of our products or technology. For example, we distribute the Skype software client to makers of mobile and computer devices who preload the Skype software client with

their products. In the event that any customer or distributor were subject to a claim that its use or distribution of our products infringed third party intellectual property rights, we may be responsible for the defense and costs of such claim, which could result in substantial expenses to us or could require us to modify or cease offering certain products in certain areas or generally. In addition, as a result of such claim, any such customer or distributor may decide not to use our products in the future, which could harm our results of operations or financial condition.

In 2009, we incurred a charge of $343.8 million in our results of operations resulting from the settlement that we and eBay reached with Joltid regarding our use of the “Global Index” technology that facilitates communications in the peer-to-peer network of Skype users, which we acquired as part of the Joltid Transaction. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Key Factors Affecting Results of Operations” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Acquisition-Related Matters—The Joltid Transaction.”

To the extent we are subject to litigation, there is a possibility that we may be adversely affected. If we are required to make substantial payments to settle legal proceedings or to satisfy any damages that might be awarded by a court, or if a court were to enter an injunction against us, any such requirement could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations or cash flows.

Finally, we may also face infringement claims from the employees, consultants, agents and outside organizations we have engaged to develop our technology. While we have sought to protect ourselves against such claims through contractual means, there can be no assurance that such contractual provisions are adequate, and any of these parties might claim full or partial ownership of the intellectual property in the technology that they were engaged to develop for us.

We license technology for certain components of our products from third parties we do not control, such as certain codec licenses used for encoding and/or decoding digital data streams and messaging “middleware” licences (used to pass information between servers). Although we have contracts in place with our third party technology providers, there can be no assurance that the technology we license will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, in the future. While proprietary or open source alternatives may be available in some cases, transitioning to such alternatives may take time and be costly. The loss of existing licenses or the unavailability of such alternative technology could result in a decrease in the quality of our products or loss of the ability to provide our products until equivalent technology or suitable alternatives can be developed, identified, licensed and integrated. For example, we have certain in-bound licenses for video compression codecs and audio compression codecs, on which our products rely. Some of these in-licenses have a fixed term and may or not be renewed by the applicable licensor. If we were required to obtain or develop suitable alternatives, the costs associated with licensing or developing such alternatives could be high and the technical challenge of assuring “backward compatibility” with older versions of our technology may be difficult to overcome and could materially harm our business.

Our products and services rely on certain technical standards, among other things, for interoperability of communication of voice and video, including standards relating to audio and video compression standards, such as H.264 and G.729. These standards may be covered by patent rights held by third parties. The combined costs of identifying and obtaining licenses from all holders of patent rights essential to such standards could be high and could reduce our profitability or increase our losses. The cost of not obtaining such licenses could also be high if a holder of such patent rights brings a claim for patent infringement. While some such patent holders, based on their involvement with the standard setting organizations, may license relevant technology to us under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, there can be no assurance that all necessary patent rights can be secured under such terms, and we may have to pay substantial royalties to secure such patent rights.

We may be unable to protect or enforce our own intellectual property rights adequately.

We regard the protection of our trademarks, service marks, copyrights, patents, domain names, trade dress, and trade secrets as critical to our success. We seek to protect our intellectual property rights by relying on national, supranational, state and common law rights, as well as a variety of administrative procedures. We also rely on confidentiality agreements and other contractual restrictions to protect our proprietary rights and intellectual property. These contractual arrangements and the other steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property, however, may not prevent misappropriation of our technology or deter independent development of similar technologies by others. For example, we rely on contractual and license agreements with our customers, distributors and users of our application programming interfaces in connection with their use of our products and technology, including “click-wrap” and “shrink-wrap” licenses with our end user customers, which are not negotiated or signed by individual licensees and therefore may be more difficult to enforce or even unenforceable in some jurisdictions. We cannot assure you that our contractual restrictions will not be breached, that we will be able to effectively enforce these agreements, that we will have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets and other proprietary information will not be disclosed or will otherwise be protected.

We continue to pursue the registration of certain of our trademarks, service marks, patents, and domain names in the European Union, the United States and in certain other jurisdictions. Effective trademark, copyright, patent, domain name, trade dress, and trade secret protection may not be available in every country or jurisdiction in which our products may be made available, which may cause our business and operating results to suffer. Where effective protection is available, it may be very expensive to maintain and may require litigation, and even then may not be successful in preventing the misappropriation of our intellectual property or the development of similar technologies by others.

We aim to protect our trademarks from infringement by third parties. However, we evaluate each case independently and we may decide to take less stringent enforcement action, or in some cases, no action at all, based on the circumstances. This may dilute our trademark rights, and subject them to challenge or invalidation, which could harm our reputation, cause confusion among our users, and undermine the value of our trademarks in the marketplace. In the extreme case, this may result in abandonment of our trademarks in jurisdictions where we have not enforced our trademarks diligently.

Competitors and other third parties may purchase our trademarks and confusingly similar terms as keywords in Internet search engine advertising programs and in the header and text of the resulting sponsored link advertisements in order to divert potential customers to their websites. Preventing such unauthorized use is inherently difficult. If we are unable to protect our trademarks and confusingly similar terms from such unauthorized use, competitors and other third parties may continue to drive potential online customers away from our websites to competing websites, which could harm our reputation and cause us to lose revenue.

Third parties have registered domain names that contain the Skype trademark without our consent, and a small proportion of the Skype domain names are registered in the names of our former employees rather than in our name. While we are seeking to have these domain names transferred to us, we may not be successful and to the extent that Skype domain names are not under our control in certain countries, it could hinder our marketing efforts, cause confusion to our users and may harm our reputation in those countries if those domain names are used in ways unrelated to our business or in ways with which we would not agree.

A number of our patents expire between 2021 to 2026. If we are unable to obtain continuations of such patents upon their expiration, we will lose the benefit of exclusive use of the technology covered by these patents. In addition, we have patent applications pending in various jurisdictions, and we cannot assure you that our pending applications will be granted. Even if patents are issued from our patent applications, which is not certain, they may be contested, circumvented or invalidated in the future. Moreover, the rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with proprietary protection or competitive advantages. Further, the claims under any patents that issue from our applications may not be broad enough to prevent others from developing technologies that are similar or that achieve similar results to ours. It is also possible that the intellectual property rights of others will bar

us from licensing and from exploiting any patents that issue from our pending applications. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications owned by others exist in the fields in which we have developed and are developing our technology. These patents and patent applications might have priority over our patent applications and could subject our patent applications to invalidation. Finally, in addition to those who may claim priority, any of our existing patents or patents that issue from our applications may also be challenged by our competitors or others on the basis that they are otherwise invalid or unenforceable.

We may be unable to protect, or enforce our intellectual property rights in, our source code adequately.

Protection of our source code is very important to us. We protect our source code as a trade secret and as a copyrighted work. We distribute our products in object code, which is a form of computer software that is executed by computers and does not reveal the structure or logic of the programming performed by humans. Our agreements with our customers prohibit reverse engineering of the object code to get access to the source code. Nevertheless, a third party might try to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and use our source code without our permission. The steps taken by us to protect our source code may not be adequate to prevent misappropriation. In addition, the laws of some countries in which we sell our product may not protect software and intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Unauthorized copying, use or reverse engineering of our products could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our Skype software client includes open source code for ancillary capabilities. However, we believe that there is no obligation to make available or redistribute other components of the Skype software as a result of the inclusion of such open source code. In the event that our software includes open source code which does in fact introduce such obligations, we may be required to freely provide source code for our products to the extent that such code is a derivative work of the open source code for others to use, modify and redistribute according to the open source code license. The terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. and other courts, and there is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our products. If we were found to have violated an open source license, the copyright holder for the corresponding open source software may be able to obtain injunctive relief and/or monetary damages against us. In addition, open source licenses generally do not provide warranties or other contractual protections regarding infringement claims or the quality of the code. Thus, we may have little or no recourse if we become subject to infringement claims relating to the open source software that we might use or if such open source software is defective in any manner.

If our business were deemed to be a regulated telecommunications business in one or more jurisdictions, it would significantly increase our expenses and may require us to change our products and other aspects of our business in potentially detrimental ways.

We operate as a software company and not as a regulated telecommunications company. We are subject to the risk that, due to changes in communications, e-commerce and other similar laws and regulations or in the application, interpretation or enforcement of both existing and future communications, e-commerce and other similar laws and regulations, we may be required to comply with communications, e-commerce and other similar laws and regulations in one or more jurisdictions. In addition, we are continually seeking ways to improve our products and offer them across multiple communication platforms, which may involve from time to time upgrades or changes in the technological infrastructure on which our products are based and which could result in subjecting our activities to greater regulation in multiple jurisdictions. For example, the rolling out of our Skype for Business suite of products in the United States may subject us to a greater risk of regulatory oversight in this country. If we are required to comply with communications, e-commerce and other similar laws and regulations, we would need to meet a number of obligations, which could vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, including new or enhanced compliance in the following areas:

If we are required to comply with communications, e-commerce and other similar laws and regulations in one or more jurisdictions, it could have the following effects, among others:

The regulation of Internet communications products is currently uncertain, which poses risks for our business from changes in laws, regulations, interpretation or enforcement of existing laws or regulations.

The current regulatory environment for Internet communications products is uncertain. Many laws and regulations were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet and related technologies and, as a result, do not contemplate or address the specific issues associated with the Internet and related technologies. Laws that do reference the Internet are being interpreted by the courts and regulatory agencies, but their applicability and scope remain largely uncertain and are subject to statutory or interpretive change. We cannot be certain that we, our partners or our users are currently in compliance with regulatory or other legal requirements in the numerous countries in which Skype is used. Our failure, or the failure of those with whom we transact business or to whom

we license our software, to comply with existing or future regulatory or other legal requirements could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Regulators disagree or may disagree with our interpretations of existing laws or regulations or the applicability of such laws or regulations to our business, or they may alter their view of the products we provide, due to a change in laws, regulations or interpretation of existing laws or regulations or otherwise. Due to the uncertainty of the regulatory status of Internet communications products in many jurisdictions worldwide, we frequently must respond to inquiries and requests from regulators about our regulatory status, which may mobilize internal resources and be time-consuming and costly.

For example, authorities in Sweden ruled in 2009 and confirmed in 2010 that we were a provider of electronic communications services in Sweden and, therefore, subject to a local notification obligation. While we disagree with the ruling of the Swedish authorities, we are however making a number of changes as to how we offer our products to Swedish users in response to the Swedish ruling. In addition, the telecommunications regulatory authority in Austria formally ruled in 2007 and again in 2008, that provision of the SkypeOut product should be suspended in Austria until we register as an electronic communications services provider and comply with local electronic communications regulations. We do not agree with the ruling of the Austrian authorities. We have not changed how SkypeOut is offered in response to this ruling and do not believe that any attempt has been made to enforce this ruling.

There can be no assurance of the views of regulators on the applicability of legal and regulatory requirements to our products in the future or of the views of regulators of any actions we have taken or may take in the future in any jurisdiction. If we are ultimately required to comply with these requirements, we may need to make changes to our products, processes, organization and infrastructure, which could be costly and difficult.

We are incorporated in Luxembourg and generally operate under Luxembourg law. For the purposes of Skype for Business sales to U.S.-based business customers, we have also recently started to offer our products through Skype Inc., a Delaware corporation. However, because our products are used worldwide, and facilitate communications among users worldwide, one or more jurisdictions (including the state jurisdictions in the United States) may claim that we or our users are required to comply with their laws based on the location of our various offices, staff, commercial partners, commercial operations, equipment or one or more of our users. Compliance with telecommunications, data retention, privacy, consumer protection and other applicable laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions and states may be complicated or costly or may require us to change our business practices or organization or limit the products we offer, and the imposition of any laws and regulations on our users may harm our business. In addition, we may be subject to overlapping legal or regulatory regimes that impose conflicting requirements on us. As our business grows and evolves and our products are used in a greater number of countries, and as the group of countries in which we employ staff grows, more jurisdictions and states are likely to claim that we are subject to their telecommunications, data retention, privacy, consumer protection, financial and other applicable laws and regulations. Any failure to comply with local laws and regulations could subject us to penalties ranging from criminal prosecution to significant fines to bans on our products.

As a precautionary response to the regulatory framework in certain countries, we have limited the manner in which we market and sell our paid products. We may decide to alter our business or the products we offer in ways that would make our activities more likely to be subject to telecommunications, consumer protection and other local laws and regulations.

As a precautionary response to the regulatory framework in certain countries, we have limited localized and offline marketing and sales activities for our paid products, such as bill boards or television advertisements. These limits on our marketing and sales activities may make it more difficult to attract or retain users or to maintain our brand, which may harm our business prospects. In the future, we may decide to change our business

model or offer products and services in ways that would make our activities more likely to be subject to telecommunications, data retention, privacy, consumer protection and other local laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions and the additional associated costs of compliance and the risks of non-compliance. We may choose to do this in one or more selected jurisdictions or generally. The benefits obtained from increased sales and marketing may be outweighed by the costs associated with regulatory compliance discussed in “—If our business were deemed to be a regulated business in one or more jurisdictions, it would significantly increase our expenses and may require us to change our products and other aspects of our business in potentially detrimental ways.”

In certain countries, we rely on our local partner for regulatory compliance.

In certain countries, such as Brazil, China, South Korea and Taiwan, we rely on our local partner for regulatory compliance, including compliance with local telecommunications laws and other applicable laws and regulations. For example, our local partner in South Korea (which is a subsidiary of eBay) and our local partner in Taiwan hold the governmental license necessary for them to offer our paid products in that country. To address the Chinese market, we have a 49% interest in an entity, Tel-Online Limited, and our majority partner, Tom Online, in practice handles relationships with local regulatory and law enforcement authorities. If our local partners do not ensure that their operations and our products comply with local law and other applicable laws and regulations, we may face additional regulation, liability or penalties or other governmental action for failure to comply with these laws and regulations, and our brand and reputation may be harmed as a result of negative publicity resulting from any such failure. Our reliance on our local partners to comply with local laws and other applicable laws and regulations could cause also us harm, reputational or otherwise. See “—User concerns about our use and protection of personal data and the privacy of their communications could harm our brand and our business.”

We develop and provide new products and features that may be deemed to be subject to telecommunications and other laws and regulations in different jurisdictions.

We are developing and have developed new products and features, such as Skype Connect and Skype Manager, that involve from time to time upgrades or changes in the technological infrastructure on which they are based and in the way they operate and are offered, which could be deemed to be subject to telecommunications and other laws and regulations in different jurisdictions. If such new products and features were deemed to be subject to, and we were required to comply with, telecommunications, data retention, privacy, consumer protection and other local laws and regulations in one or more jurisdictions, we would need to meet a number of obligations, which could vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. See “—If our business were deemed to be a regulated business in one or more jurisdictions, it could significantly increase our expenses and may require us to change our products and other aspects of our business in potentially detrimental ways.”

Third parties have raised, and may raise in the future, concerns about the application of regulations to our business.

Some third parties, including our competitors, have raised, and may raise in the future, concerns with policymakers and regulators in various parts of the world about the application of local laws and regulations to our business. We believe that some of these established businesses (which may include incumbent telecommunications companies) and their trade association groups employ significant resources in their efforts to shape legal and regulatory regimes and may employ these resources to change legal and regulatory regimes in ways intended to reduce the effectiveness of our business. Most incumbent telecommunications companies, landline and wireless, have substantial budgets devoted to lobbying and governmental relations and long-standing relationships with regulators and legislators that we, as a newer entrant in the Internet communications market, do not have. Some of these incumbent businesses have raised concerns relating to allowing consumers open access to the Internet, the lack of regulatory controls and obligations placed on Internet communications products, and the cost advantage this brings to providers of such products. Continuing actions by these competitors or trade groups may result in additional jurisdictions requiring us to comply with the local telecommunications and other laws and regulations.

We may be required to comply with emergency calling regulations in certain jurisdictions. Compliance with emergency calling regulations may be costly and technically difficult.

In many jurisdictions, traditional and replacement telephony service providers and some other forms of communications service providers are required to provide customers with emergency calling services (such as dialing 911 in the United States or 112 in the European Union) that route calls directly to an emergency services dispatcher in the caller’s area. In some jurisdictions, for example, the United States, these emergency calling services obligations also include a requirement that the telecommunications provider provide the location of the person making the emergency call. Our products generally do not offer emergency calling services.

At the end of 2009, for example, the European Parliament adopted amendments to the E.U. telecommunications regulatory framework that will require changes to be made to communications laws of the 27 E.U. Member States by May 2011. Under the E.U. directive, home country legislation must provide that any electronic communications service designed for originating calls must provide “reliable and accurate” access to emergency services through emergency numbers. Although it is currently uncertain how each Member State will implement these amendments and whether these amendments will apply to our operations, we may be required to comply as and when implementing legislation is introduced in the E.U. Member States. We have voluntarily begun to provide a basic level of emergency calling functionality without location information in the United Kingdom. In late 2010 and in 2011, we intend to implement a similar voluntary basic level of emergency calling functionality in Australia and certain Nordic countries, and we may voluntarily offer certain emergency calling services in other jurisdictions in the future.

Unlike landline phones, where the telephone is located at a fixed address, or mobile phones, which can be located using triangulation of cell towers or GPS technology in the handset, we are unable to determine the exact location of a caller who uses our products to make a call over the Internet. Our customers have the ability to use our products nomadically, meaning that they can log in and use our products from virtually any Internet connection worldwide. They can also log in on up to five devices simultaneously at a variety of locations. Although we have the limited ability to identify the registered user using our products to make a call (based on information voluntarily provided to us when the user first registered with us), we cannot determine the actual location from which a call is originated. Additionally, due to the inherent nature of transmission via the Internet, we are unable to guarantee completion of any call, including a call to emergency services. The E.U. telecommunications framework amendments also include a provision that, once internationally recognized standards ensuring accurate and reliable routing and connection to the emergency services are in place, “network-independent” providers, such as Skype, should also fulfill the obligations related to caller location information at a level comparable to that required of other providers. To date, in places where we have enabled and will enable this functionality, we are still unable to identify reliably the geographic location of the user beyond the country level or to provide detailed caller information, and the user location information is not being provided to our carrier partners or emergency call centers in connection with the call.

If we were required to comply fully with all emergency calling service requirements, which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, it would be costly and technically and administratively difficult or impossible. Compliance with these regulations may require us to alter or limit our products in certain jurisdictions or otherwise change the way we do business in those jurisdictions.

If we were required to contribute directly to universal service funds, the cost of providing our products would increase, and if we were to seek to recover the increased cost from our customers, the cost advantage of using our products would be reduced.

Certain countries, including the United States, France, Spain, Canada, Australia, India, Japan, Hong Kong, South Korea and Taiwan, as well as several states within the United States, have adopted laws that allow regulatory authorities to require telecommunications providers to contribute to a universal service fund, or USF, that is imposed by law and applied through regulation to facilitate access to telecommunications services by all

potential users. For example, in the United States, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission requires certain telecommunications carriers or interconnected voice over Internet protocol providers to contribute a percentage of their interstate revenues to the federal universal service fund. The percentage is adjusted periodically and was 13.6% of interstate revenue as of June 30, 2010. Currently, we rely on our carrier partners, which are telecommunications providers, to make any federal universal service fund payment applicable to our paid products. From time to time we have received, and may continue to receive, inquiries from regulators relating to the applicability of the universal service fund to our paid products. We respond to these inquiries in the ordinary course, stating that direct universal service payment requirements are not applicable to our products. In the United States, for example, the federal universal service fund only applies to telecommunications services and interconnected voice over the Internet protocol services, a category of services we believe would not include our paid products. If we were required to contribute directly to any universal service funds, including due to a change in laws or regulations or a change in interpretation of current laws or regulations, the cost of providing our products would increase. If we became subject to any such laws or regulations, we might seek to collect universal service fund contributions from our customers or alternatively recover increased costs through rates we charge for calls; however, that would increase the cost of our products to our customers and could reduce demand for our products. In addition, if we were required to make universal service fund contributions based upon a change in interpretation of a current regulation, the requirements for the contribution might be imposed on us retroactively, in which case we would be unable to recover costs relating to past calls from our customers. Retroactive application of these laws could also require us to make significant payments, which could harm our results of operations or financial condition.

Compliance with requests from law enforcement agencies and compliance with data disclosure and lawful interception laws is costly and difficult and might subject us to conflicting obligations and result in improper interpretation and application of complex laws.

Communications companies are subject to various regulations that require them to assist law enforcement and intelligence agencies with access to personal and traffic data and lawful interception of certain of their services and products. The scope of applicability and level of sophistication of such regulations vary greatly from country to country. We have been and may in the future be asked to disclose historic personal and traffic data to various law enforcement agencies. In addition, various authorities could consider that we are subject to lawful interception laws, and we have been contacted from time to time by a number of authorities in relation to our ability to intercept, trace or identify our users’ communications. To the extent that our products and operations are or were found to be or would become subject to lawful interception laws in any jurisdiction, we would need to adapt our systems and processes to comply with a variety of requirements on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis, which can be very costly and technically difficult. Furthermore, such requests by law enforcement and other authorities can make us subject to potentially conflicting obligations across jurisdictions. In addition, determining whether compliance is legally appropriate in any particular case could require us to exercise judgment and result in improper interpretation and application of complex laws. Compliance with data disclosure and legal interception orders may also conflict with certain local laws, including laws governing privacy.

Many countries, such as the E.U. Member States via the 2006 E.U. Data Retention Directive, are introducing, or have already introduced, into local law some form of traffic and user data retention requirements, which are generally applicable to providers of electronic communications services. Retention periods and data types vary from country to country, and the various local data protection and other authorities may determine their jurisdiction with respect to certain data in different and potentially overlapping manners. We may be subject to data retention obligations in one or more jurisdictions, and we could become further subject to these obligations through changes to our product offerings or as result of modifications to our products or changes to the technological infrastructure on which our products are based or otherwise. Compliance with those laws can be difficult and costly to our activities from a legal, operational and technical perspective.

Telecommunications numbering rules could require us to change the manner in which we use or contract for numbers, or require that we suspend, withdraw or otherwise limit number-based products.

In the jurisdictions where we enable the provision of numbers for our SkypeIn or Skype to Go products, changes in the numbering rules or changes in their interpretation or enforcement could require us to change the manner in which we use or contract for numbers, or require that we authorize transfers (or provide portability), suspend, withdraw or otherwise limit number-based products in affected markets, potentially resulting in customer claims and loss of customers, regulatory disputes, limitations to future local operations, including limitations on the usage of numbers and access to carrier partners, negatively impacting the Skype brand, products, carrier and other partnerships, operations and regulatory positioning in the relevant jurisdictions. See “Business—Regulation.”

Regulation on import, export and distribution of highly encrypted technologies can pose risks for our business.

In some countries, the export, import and distribution (online and offline) of highly encrypted technologies, such as our software application, are subject to licenses, authorizations or permissions by relevant local authorities. In 2006, we obtained an authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce for the export of Skype software. If we are not able to obtain, maintain or update import, export and distribution authorizations and licenses in countries that require them, it may negatively impact the distribution, availability and use of our products and our partners’ products in such countries and subject us to penalties ranging from criminal prosecution to fines or bans on the distribution of our products.

Compliance with disabilities access regulations could be technically difficult and could impose significant additional costs on our operations.

In some jurisdictions, telecommunications services, website and software providers are subject to various rules to ensure that their sites and products are sufficiently accessible to people with disabilities, such as visual impairment. These rules are designed generally to ensure that people with disabilities can access the features of websites or software in a functionally equivalent manner as compared to people without disabilities. For example, legislation proposing new or additional disability access obligations on software providers is pending in the U.S. Congress. Changes in these obligations may impact the way we develop, and the usability of, our software. Similarly, the European Commission is becoming more active in this area, and requirements for functional equivalence were adopted in the review of the E.U. electronic communications regulatory framework agreed at the end of 2009. Depending on how the revised provisions are adopted by individual E.U. Member States, requirements to implement disabilities access requirements on part or all of our website and one or more of our products could be technically difficult to comply with and could impose significant additional costs on our operations.

If our online credits were regulated as a currency or if we were regulated as an electronic money lending institution or similar entity, we would face additional compliance costs.

Our customers purchase online prepaid credits to buy and use our paid products, which we refer to as Skype Credit. If existing laws and regulations that apply to currencies, currency issuing activities or electronic money (e-money) were interpreted by regulators to apply to Skype Credit or us, or if new laws or regulations were adopted that would cause Skype Credit to be regulated as a currency, e-money or financial service generally or if we were regulated as an electronic money lending institution, we could be required to comply with those laws and regulations and any such compliance may be costly. For example, if Skype Credit were regulated as a currency or as e-money or if we were regulated as an electronic money lending institution or credit issuer, we may be required to seek licenses, authorizations or approvals from relevant regulators, the granting of which may be dependent on us meeting certain capital and other prudential requirements; we may be subject to additional oversight of our business; and we may be required to comply with conduct of business rules, including disclosure requirements and anti-money laundering and know-your-customer rules, all of which could significantly increase our operating costs.

For example, in 2009, the Japanese Financial Services Act was amended establishing new conditions requiring companies that offer pre-paid credit to register as an issuer of credit and post a bond, for example by establishing a trust fund, amounting to a minimum of 50% of the total of the value of the outstanding amount of credit. While we believe that we do not conduct operations in Japan, if we were ultimately required to comply with the new provisions of the Japanese Financial Services Act, compliance could be costly and difficult.

Certain countries are reported to have prohibited or blocked the use of our products; however, consumers in those countries may continue to use our products, which may cause these countries to impose penalties on us or take other governmental action against us, any of which may harm our business.

Certain countries have made the use of one or more of our products illegal or are reported to have prohibited or blocked access to our website. For example, the United Arab Emirates is reported to have banned the use of our products and the accessibility of our website in its territory. In addition, in March 2010, the Egyptian National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority (“NTRA”) announced that it was banning Skype when accessed on mobile devices, citing an Egyptian law that international calls must pass through an international long distance gateway controlled by a license holding Egyptian company. However, we believe, following clarification from the Communications Ministry, that Skype products are authorized to be accessed through fixed broadband and fixed and mobile WiFi Internet connections in Egypt. Even where our products are reportedly illegal or become illegal and access to our website is impaired, users in those countries who continue to have access to our software may be able to continue to use our products in those countries notwithstanding the illegality of doing so. We may be subject to penalties or governmental action if consumers continue to use our products in countries where it is illegal to do so, and any such penalties or governmental action may be costly and may harm our business.

Because we are not a regulated telecommunications provider, we do not receive certain protections that regulated telecommunications providers receive.

In a number of jurisdictions, “interconnected VoIP” companies are exempt from liability for failure of emergency calling services. In the United Kingdom, we voluntarily offer certain limited emergency calling services and intend to voluntarily offer certain emergency calling services in other selected jurisdictions in the future. In jurisdictions where we offer emergency calling services, we may be responsible for potential limitations and failures in the provisions of such services, and we may not have the benefit of any exemptions from liability that may be provided to regulated telecommunications providers. The unavailability of this exemption may expose us to liability from customers who suffer personal injury or other damages as a result of using our emergency calling services. Any such liability could be significant.

Our business depends on our users having continued and unimpeded access to the Internet. Companies providing access to the Internet may be able to block or degrade our calls, or block access to our website or charge us or our users additional fees for our products.

Most of our users rely on open, unrestricted access to the Internet to use our products. In many cases that access is provided by companies that compete with at least some of our products, including incumbent landline telephone companies, cable television system operators, mobile wireless communications companies, and large Internet service providers. Some of these providers have stated that they may take measures that could block, degrade or otherwise disrupt our calls, or increase the cost of customers’ use of our products by restricting or prohibiting the use of their lines or access points to the Internet for our products, by filtering, blocking, delaying, or degrading the packets of data used to transmit our communications, and by charging increased fees to our users for access to our products. For example, in June 2010 AT&T in the United States and carrier partners in the United Kingdom introduced tiered priced data plans for the iPhone setting monthly data usage limits, with iPhone users incurring overcharges above those quotas, which may diminish the attractiveness of our products on the iPhone as users increase their data use. In addition, these Internet access providers may limit the ability of our existing or prospective users to gain access to our website to download our software or purchase Skype Credit.

Some Internet access providers have additionally, or alternatively, contractually restricted their customers’ access to Internet communications products (which would include Skype) through their terms of service. For example, SFR in France and Vodafone in Germany contractually prohibit their customers from using voice over the Internet protocol services on the Apple iPad 3G. T-Mobile in Germany and Vodafone in France and the United Kingdom have established special additional tariffs for voice over the Internet protocol. Customers of these and other Internet access providers may not be aware that technical disruptions or additional tariffs are the act of other parties, which could harm our brand. Even if customers understand that we are not the source of such disruptions, they may be less likely to use our products as a result.

Our products may also be blocked or degraded by firewalls or other measures implemented to protect private networks maintained by enterprises, governmental bodies or others, and certain of these entities may take steps to prevent their employees and other users of their networks from using Skype products. Interference with our products or higher charges for access to our products, whether paid by us or by our customers, could cause us to lose existing customers, impair our ability to attract new customers, and harm our revenues and growth.

In the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions, regulatory authorities are in the process of examining the adoption of “network neutrality” policies, which aim to treat all Internet traffic equally, and developing or considering laws and regulations to codify acceptable behaviors on the part of network operators and access providers when providing consumers and businesses with access to the Internet. Different regulatory authorities have different approaches to this policy area both from a substantive and procedural perspective. Any failure on the part of regulatory authorities to protect the accessibility of the Internet to all, or any particularly category of, Internet subscribers, or their failure to protect the delivery on a non-discriminatory basis of user communications over the Internet, regardless of type or service, could harm our results of operations and prospects.

Our future performance depends substantially on the continued services of our senior management and other key personnel, including our engineers, and our ability to retain and motivate them. We do not have long-term employment agreements with any of our key personnel and we do not maintain any “key person” life insurance policies. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could harm our business, as could the loss of certain groups of engineers. Our business depends on attracting and retaining key personnel. Our future success also will depend on our ability to attract, train, retain and motivate highly skilled engineering, technical, managerial, marketing and customer support personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense, and we may be unable to successfully attract, integrate, or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. In making employment decisions, particularly in the Internet and high-technology industries, job candidates often consider the value of the equity awards they would receive in connection with their employment. If our employees have substantial in-the-money, vested options or other equity awards it may be difficult to motivate and retain those employees. Conversely, if options granted to our employees have exercise prices that are substantially “under water,” meaning that the option exercise price is above our then-current ordinary share price or ADS price, it may be difficult to motivate and retain those employees. Likewise, if the market price of our ordinary shares or ADSs does not increase or declines, it may limit our ability to attract new employees with equity incentives.

Our senior management has limited experience working together as a group and may not be able to manage our business effectively.

Many of the members of our senior management, including our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Legal Officer, have been hired since March 2010. As a result, our senior management has limited experience working together as a group. This lack of shared experience could harm our senior management’s ability to quickly and efficiently respond to problems and effectively manage our business. If our senior management is not able to effectively work together as a group, our results of operations may suffer and our business may be harmed.

Rapidly evolving technologies could cause demand for our products to decline or could cause our products to become obsolete.

Current or future competitors may develop technological or product innovations that address Internet communications in a manner that is, or is perceived to be, equivalent or superior to our products. In the technology market in particular, innovative products have been introduced which have the effect of revolutionizing a product category and rendering many existing products obsolete. If competitors introduce new products or services that compete with or surpass the quality or the price/performance of our products, we may be unable to attract and retain users or to maintain or increase revenues from our users. We may not anticipate such developments and may be unable to adequately compete with these potential solutions. As a result of these or similar potential developments, in the future it is possible that competitive dynamics in our market may require us to reduce prices for our paid for products, which could harm our net revenues, gross margin and operating results or cause us to incur losses.

Our software, products and website could contain undetected errors or “bugs” that could adversely affect their performance. We regularly update and enhance our software and website and introduce new versions of our software, which often results in errors. The prevalence of software bugs is typically higher in the context of releases of new generations of software than in the releases of more modest version upgrades. The occurrence of errors in our software, products or website may cause us to lose users, damage our reputation and brand name, and materially and adversely affect our business. In addition, as our users increase their use of our paid for products, they may have higher expectations for these products than for free products. Also, as we increasingly introduce products particularly targeted at business users, we may find that business users have more demanding expectations than individual users, and even minor errors in our software could deter business users.

Although we seek to reduce the possibility of disruptions or other outages, our service may be disrupted by problems with our technology and systems, such as malfunctions in our software or other facilities and overloading of our network. We have experienced system failures from time to time, and any interruption in the ability of users to use our products would reduce our current net revenues, could harm our future net revenues, and could subject us to regulatory scrutiny. System failures can result from errors in our software. In August 2007, we experienced an interruption with the peer-to-peer network of our users as a result of an unanticipated feature of our software during which the majority of our users were unable to use our products for approximately two days. We experienced significant adverse publicity and lost net revenues as a result of this outage, and any similar outage in the future would likely harm our business. As we increasingly introduce products particularly targeted at business customers, any system failures could have a significant impact on our ability to attract or maintain our relationships with business customers. In addition, the servers that process user payments experience some downtime on a regular basis and during these times our customers cannot make SkypeOut calls, which may result in lost revenues and may negatively impact our brand and customer perception of the reliability of our products. Any scheduled or unscheduled interruption in the ability of customers to use our products could result in an immediate, and possibly substantial, loss of revenues.

Our systems may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from telecommunications failures, computer denial-of-service attacks, power loss, computer viruses, earthquakes, floods, fires, terrorist attacks and similar events. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning is not sufficient for all eventualities. Our systems are also subject to break-ins, sabotage, and acts of vandalism. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural disaster, a decision by any of our third-party hosting providers or telecommunications reseller partners to close a facility we use without adequate notice for financial or other reasons, or other unanticipated problems at our hosting facilities could result in lengthy interruptions in the availability of our products. We do not carry business interruption insurance sufficient to compensate us for losses that may result from interruptions in the availability of our products as a result of system failures.

Our customers (particularly those who use our products for business, which is an area where we are seeking to increase our penetration) may use our products for critical transactions and communications. As a result, any system failures could result in damage to our customers’ businesses. These customers could seek significant compensation from us for their losses. Even if unsuccessful, this type of claim likely would be time consuming and costly for us to address.

Our business depends on the continued reliability of the Internet infrastructure.

Unlike traditional communications products, our users rely on the Internet to communicate via Skype. Increasing numbers of users and increasing bandwidth requirements may harm the performance of the Internet. In addition, if Internet service providers and other third parties providing Internet services have outages or deteriorations in their quality of service, our customers will not have access to our products or may experience a decrease in the quality of our products. Furthermore, as the rate of adoption of new technology increases, the networks on which our products rely in certain countries may not be able to sufficiently adapt to the increased demand for their products and services. Frequent or persistent interruptions could cause current or potential users to believe that our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors or to avoid our products, and could permanently harm our reputation and brands.

Use of our products for illegal purposes could harm our business or brand.

We may be unable to prevent our users from using our products in an unlawful manner, and we may be subject to allegations of civil or criminal liability for unlawful activities carried out by users through the use of our products. We may be obligated to expend resources to attempt to prevent illegal activities. In a number of circumstances, third parties have alleged that our products facilitate and enable certain violations of certain laws, such as anti-spamming (i.e., the sending of spam through instant messages), promulgation of unlawful or illegal content and other criminal and terrorist activities. Our products may be used for criminal or terrorist purposes, and any high-profile criminal or terrorist action organized through the use of our products could result in adverse media attention that could damage our reputation or cause governments to obligate us to enable communications via our products to be intercepted and decrypted, which would be costly and technically difficult. In addition, users may register with a Skype Name that a third party believes infringe its intellectual property rights (e.g., cybersquatting). If any of these third parties were to seek to hold us responsible for any alleged direct, contributory or indirect intellectual property infringements, defending against such claims could be costly and time consuming. Any costs incurred as a result of potential liability relating to unlawful activities conducted through the use of our products could harm our business. In addition, negative publicity relating to such unlawful activities could damage our reputation, diminish the value of our brand and make users less likely to use our products.

Our business is subject to online security risks, including security breaches and identity theft.

To succeed, providers of online products must provide a secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. Our security measures may not detect or prevent security breaches that could harm our business. Currently, a significant number of our users authorize us to bill their credit card accounts directly. We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from third parties to provide the security and authentication designed to secure transmission of confidential information, including customer credit card numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology used by us to protect transaction data. In addition, any party who is able to illicitly obtain a user’s password could access the user’s Skype account, including any personal data contained in the account, and misappropriate payment data to make payments and funding calls. An increasing number of websites have reported breaches of their security. Any compromise of our security could harm our reputation and, therefore, our business, and could result in a violation of applicable privacy and other laws. In addition, a party that is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information, cause interruption in our operations, damage our users’ computers, or otherwise damage our reputation and business.

Our users, as well as those of other Internet companies, have been and will continue to be targeted by parties using fraudulent “spoof” and “phishing” emails to misappropriate passwords, credit card numbers, or other personal information or to introduce viruses through “trojan horse” programs to our users’ computers. These emails appear to be legitimate e-mails sent by us, but direct recipients to fake websites operated by the sender of the email or request that the recipient send a password or other confidential information via email or download a program. In addition, “spam” e-mails, unwanted and unsolicited communications from one user to another, have been sent abusively via our network, recently from a group of individuals acting in concert. Spam e-mails are generally phishing emails or seek to sell products or services. Spoof, phishing and spam pose a serious problem that may damage our brand, discourage use of our website, and increase our costs.

Certain third parties have established websites to attempt to fraudulently charge consumers for our free software. While we are attempting to prevent the operation of these fraudulent websites, we may not be successful. These fraudulent websites may damage our brand and may increase our expenses as we monitor and take steps with respect to these sites as appropriate.

Our or third party servers are also vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and similar disruptions, and we have experienced “denial-of-service” type attacks on our system that have attempted to make all or portions of our websites unavailable for periods of time. We may need to expend significant resources to protect against security breaches or to address problems caused by breaches. Security breaches, including any breach by us or by parties with which we have commercial relationships that result in the unauthorized release of our users’ personal information, could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. Insurance policies covering our business, when they are available, may not adequately reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches.

For example, an individual has recently been able to reverse engineer parts of our protocol, emulate our Skype software client on the peer-to-peer network of our users and perform such functions as log-on, search, instant messaging or sending contact requests. We believe that the privacy of our users’ communications, which are encrypted, is currently not compromised, and that the components of our Skype software client relating to voice or video calls have not been reverse engineered. However, we have observed that this reverse engineering activity has been used to send spam via instant messaging on the peer-to-peer network of our users. In addition, we are aware that the results of this reverse engineering has been leaked, both inadvertently and deliberately, increasing the likelihood that others will attempt to interact with the network of our users emulating legitimate clients, including for malicious purposes such as spamming.

The peer-to-peer architecture of our software may create, or may be perceived as creating, additional security risks and system constraints.

Due to the peer-to-peer architecture of our software, our software utilizes small amounts of the processor and Internet bandwidth of users’ computers (or other applicable devices), making them “relay nodes” or “super-nodes” in the peer-to-peer network. Super-nodes allow users’ computing and mobile devices to find other connected users. Relay nodes relay communications between other Skype users when direct, peer-to-peer communication is not possible. In most cases, users must allow their computing devices’ resources to be used in order to use our software. Users may discontinue using our products based on concerns about a portion of the resources of their computing power and their Internet bandwidth being used by our products or privacy or security concerns relating to being connected to other users through the peer-to-peer community. Managers of some large networks in businesses and large institutions may refuse to allow the use of our products due to concerns over security or bandwidth usage or for other reasons. The perception that our software is unsafe could hamper its adoption, and any actual security breach could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability.

Failure to deal effectively with fraudulent transactions would increase our loss rate and could increase expenses, result in the loss of our ability to accept certain credit cards and harm our business.

We must remit payment to credit card companies for transactions due to fraud or other reasons, a process to which we refer as “chargeback.” In that regard, we estimate that for the pro forma year ended December 31, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010, our losses resulting from chargebacks were $5.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Identity thieves and those committing fraud using stolen credit card or bank account numbers can potentially steal large amounts of money using our products. We have become aware of certain fraudulent activities involving the creation of a significant number of spurious user accounts. These criminals create new accounts, purchase Skype’s prepaid calling credit, which we refer to as Skype Credit, for each new account using a stolen credit card number or bank account information, and then establish their own 900 numbers to charge amounts from these stolen credit cards back to their own accounts or sell the Skype Credits to other consumers who use them to make SkypeOut calls. We pay a fee for SkypeOut calls to enable that call to be made to a landline or mobile phone on that network. We refer to this fee as a “termination fee,” and it is usually charged based on the duration of the call. When fraudulent Skype Credits are used to make SkypeOut calls, we are required to pay these termination fees, which adversely affects our results of operations. When credit card charges by users are disputed by the credit cardholder for fraud reasons or otherwise, the credit card company will require us to remit back to them the payment we received. These credit card companies also charge us a processing fee for all chargebacks. In those cases, we must pay this processing fee, which adversely affects our results of operations. In addition, it often takes several payment cycles for credit card companies to detect fraudulent activity, which can further increase chargebacks and related processing fees.

Our subscription plans may also be the subject of fraudulent activity. While the subscription plans that we offer are subject to fair use policies that require that the plan be used only by the individual customer, we are aware that users have violated these policies by allowing multiple people to use the same plan. Because our software allows users to log on to up to five devices simultaneously, it is difficult for us to detect and prevent this type of fraudulent activity.

Fraudulent schemes are constantly evolving which makes it difficult for us to detect and prevent them. We expect that technically knowledgeable criminals will continue to attempt to circumvent our anti-fraud systems using increasingly sophisticated methods. Measures we take to deter or prevent fraud (such as limiting the use of Skype products to call 900 numbers or limiting the amount of Skype Credit that a user can purchase to a small amount, like $10) may reduce the convenience or simplicity of our products or make it more difficult to purchase and use Skype Credit, which may make our products less attractive to customers.

In addition to the direct costs of losses from credit card chargebacks, if these chargebacks become excessive, we would face higher credit card processing fees and could potentially lose the right to accept credit cards for payment. Under credit card rules and our contracts with our card processors, if there is a breach of credit card information that we store or if we fail to maintain compliance with the Payment Card Industry data security standard, even if there is no actual compromise of customer information, we could be liable to the credit card issuing banks for their cost of issuing new cards and related expenses and could lose the right to accept credit cards for payment.

Our products are available in almost every country where the public Internet is accessible. In certain cases, our partners localize our products to take account of local language, culture, standards, and policies. In addition, we may choose to partner with a third party in certain countries, which could result in an increase in distribution expenses payable or sharing of revenue with these partners. In certain countries, we or our local partner may be required to obtain relevant licenses or registrations to offer communication products in such country, and without such licenses or registrations we or our partner may be unable to offer certain of our products in those countries. As a consequence, we might have to suspend or withdraw products or operations that relate to such country or could be subject to penalties, which could harm our business.

In many countries, we compete with local companies that understand the local market better than we do and have greater local political and economic power. We may not be successful in achieving consumer acceptance of our products in particular international markets or in generating net revenues from those markets.

In emerging markets, there may be constraints on the abilities of local users to purchase Skype Credit. In these markets, we may need to partner with local payment providers to permit local users to purchase Skype Credit. These arrangements may be difficult to establish due to potentially conflicting sales and value added tax rules, potential requirements for telecommunications licenses and other local laws and requirements. We also face additional costs in these markets as we localize our products, including enabling payment for our products in the local currency.

In addition to the risks discussed elsewhere in this section, we are subject to risks of doing business worldwide, including the following:

User concerns about our use and protection of personal data and the privacy of their communications and data protection breaches could harm our brand and our business.

Certain of our users, particularly those in the United States and Europe, have strong expectations about the confidentiality of their personal data and the content of their communications. Negative publicity regarding actual or perceived intrusions on our users’ privacy could harm our brand and reduce demand for our products. For example, in China, Tom Online, the majority investor in Tel-Online Limited in which we hold a 49% interest, has added filtering technology to the localized version of our product that allows instant messages to be filtered and stored along with related data based on content. We understand that Tel-Online Limited is obligated by the government to provide this filtering and storage. We received significant negative media attention as a result of these practices and a related security failure relating to the storage of these instant messages. Further news reports concerning content filtering and the apparent lack of privacy of communications in China and other countries are attracting political attention in the United States and Europe. Such attention could develop into legislative action resulting in additional legal requirements being imposed on us.

We make available on our website our privacy policy, which describes how we use, store and disclose our users’ personal and traffic data. In addition, details of how we use our users’ personal data are maintained on a public register in Luxembourg. We have made various international data transfers to our partners and suppliers

located outside the European Union. International transfers of data may require prior approval from regulatory authorities in Luxembourg and other administrative or contractual measures to be put in place. Increased operations worldwide or changes to the location of our suppliers may result in an increased administrative burden in dealing with international data transfers. Data protection and related laws and regulations that apply or may apply to an Internet communications company like Skype with users and partners in multiple jurisdictions can be unclear and overlapping, requiring interpretation where precedents are not available and creating uncertainty and potential conflicts of law. Moreover, changes or upgrades to our products or technological infrastructure on which our products, or the introduction of new products, are based could result in our activities being subject to data protection, data retention and related laws and regulations in multiple jurisdictions, increasing uncertainty as well as potential overlap and conflicts of law. In addition, certain jurisdictions, such as the European Union and the United States, have new or pending privacy legislation that would require notification of consumer data breaches and other privacy protections. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to comply with our posted privacy policy or with any legal or regulatory requirements relating to privacy in one or multiple jurisdictions could result in proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others and subject us to significant penalties and negative publicity.

In addition, communications companies are subject to various additional data security, privacy, data retention and disclosure laws and regulations locally, some of which conflict across jurisdictions. If communications laws and regulations were found to be applicable to us, it would be difficult for us to comply with them.

While some of these privacy requirements apply to our business in Luxembourg and in the United States (with respect to United States based users of Skype for Business), complying with all of these various requirements on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis would impose additional costs on our operations and would be difficult and costly.

Acquisitions and other strategic transactions could result in operating difficulties, dilution, and other harmful consequences.

We periodically evaluate and consider a wide range of potential strategic transactions, including business combinations and acquisitions of businesses, technologies, services, products and other assets. Any of these transactions could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. We may not realize the anticipated benefits of any of these transactions, or may not realize them in the time frame expected. We may also experience difficulties in integrating the operations and employees of any acquired businesses and in retaining and motivating key personnel from these businesses. Any of these transactions may divert management’s attention, disrupt our ongoing operations, increase our expenses and adversely impact our business and results of operations. In addition, acquisitions of foreign operations involve additional risks, including the need to integrate operations across different cultures and languages and to address the particular economic, currency, political, and regulatory risks associated with specific countries. Any acquisitions or strategic transactions may require us to issue additional equity securities, which could be dilutive to our shareholders, spend our cash, or incur debt, liabilities, amortization expenses related to intangible assets or write-offs of assets or goodwill, any of which could adversely affect our results of operations and harm our business.

We do not have operational control over entities and strategic alliances in which we hold a minority interest and the conduct of the controlling partner in such arrangements may harm our reputation or adversely affect the value of our investment and may limit our ability to offer our products in certain markets directly or through other third parties.

We have and may in the future acquire minority equity interests in entities and enter into strategic alliances, in which we lack management and operational control. For example, to address the Chinese market we have a 49% equity interest in an entity in which Tom Online has a majority stake. Minority investments involve risks. The controlling partner in such entities and alliances may have business interests, strategies or goals that are inconsistent with ours, including with respect to customer relations, investments, marketing and other business

initiatives, interactions with local governments and competitors, and business decisions. Actions or omissions of the controlling partner or the entity in which we have an interest may result in harm to our reputation or adversely affect the value of our investment. Our partners may go bankrupt, which may as a practical matter subject us to such partners’ liabilities in connection with the entity in which we have an interest. In addition, entities in which we hold a minority interest or other strategic relationships may be exclusive in certain countries or regions, which may limit our ability to offer our products directly or through another third party in that geography.

Our SkypeIn and Skype To Go businesses are highly dependent on partners in different jurisdictions, and the conduct, business practices and financial health of those partners expose us to potential risks that could harm our reputation and adversely affect our products in those jurisdictions.

The offer of number-based products by Skype is highly dependent on our operator partners providing us the numbers in different jurisdictions. The SkypeIn product, which assigns a number to a user who can then receive calls on his or her computer or other Internet-connected device from a landline or mobile phone, and the Skype To Go business, which uses numbers to allow users to access the Skype calling functionality from any phone, are our two key products using numbers. Numbers are contracted under commercial arrangements with third party telecommunications operators, who generally have obtained the numbers directly from the relevant numbering authorities. In most of the countries in which we offer SkypeIn or Skype To Go products, we rely on one partner for the provision of numbers. In certain markets, the SkypeIn or Skype To Go numbers are provided directly by such partners to end users, who contract with the end users for such numbers. Moreover, although our commercial agreements with our numbering partners usually include provisions requiring the transfer of numbers to a third party appointed by Skype upon termination of our agreement, such transfers may be legally, commercially, technically or practically difficult or impossible to carry out. As a result of these dependencies, the success of our SkypeIn and Skype To Go businesses is highly dependent on the ongoing conduct, business practices and financial health of our numbering partners, and the partner relationships we have with them. For example, if our local number partner terminated the agreement with Skype, encountered financial difficulty or became subject to bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings, we might have to terminate or suspend the usage of existing SkypeIn and Skype To Go products and/or change the numbers in use by SkypeIn and Skype To Go end users in the affected country, disrupting the usage of the product by our end users.

Moreover, if local numbering rules or regulations or the interpretation or enforcement of such rules or regulations by local authorities or our partners change, we or our partners might have to terminate the provision of the affected products or implement relevant compliance measures, which could be difficult and costly, complicate the subscription process or restrict the usage of numbers to certain user categories or usage types. In addition, our partners may change their business practices in response to local or international factors (e.g., governmental regulation, competition, change in management or otherwise), and depending on the nature of such changes, they may impact our partners’ ability or willingness to provide SkypeIn or Skype To Go numbers or to provide them in the manner that we would prefer, or result in increased costs or new compliance requirements impacting our products.

Any of these changes and events could have an adverse impact on our SkypeIn and Skype To Go products, our business, results of operations, brand, reputation and regulatory status in the country in question and beyond.

Use or delivery of our products may become subject to new or increased regulatory requirements, taxes or fees.

The increasing growth and popularity of Internet communications heighten the risk that governments will seek to regulate or impose new or increased fees or taxes on Internet communications products. To the extent that the use of our products grows, regulators may be more likely to seek to regulate or impose taxes on the distribution of our products. Similarly, advances in technology that are within or outside our control, such as improvements in locating the geographic origin of Internet communications, could cause our products to become subject to additional regulations, fees or taxes or could require us to invest in or develop new technologies, which

may be costly. In addition, as we continue to expand our user base and offer more products, we may become subject to new regulations, fees or taxes. For example, provision of our Skype for Business suite of products in the United States may result in greater regulatory oversight and increased exposure to income, sales and utility taxes and telecommunications fees in the United States. Increased fees could include access and other charges payable to local telephone companies that allow calls from Skype users to be made to traditional landline and mobile phones, contributions to federal or state universal service funds in the United States and similar funds elsewhere, and other charges. Increased regulatory requirements, taxes or fees on Internet communications products, which could be assessed by governments retroactively or prospectively, would substantially increase our costs, and, as a result, our business would suffer.

We may become subject to additional income tax expense, which would adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our ADSs.

Skype’s favorable geographic mix of income contributes to lowering our overall tax expense. In particular, while our income is generated predominantly by our Luxembourg operating company, our tax expense is significantly lower than the amount computed by applying the Luxembourg statutory tax rate to pre-tax U.S. GAAP income because our taxable income is reduced as a consequence of, among other items, our intercompany licenses of intellectual property and historic net operating losses in Luxembourg. However, the determination of taxable income in any jurisdiction is dependent upon, among other factors, the acceptance of our operational and intercompany transfer pricing practices by taxing authorities as being on an arm’s length basis. Because the arm’s length standard is inconsistently applied among tax authorities and because double tax treaty relief may not be available, successful transfer pricing challenges could materially increase our reported income tax expense. Furthermore, it is possible that one or more jurisdictions will change its tax laws or its interpretation of existing tax laws (possibly on a retroactive basis) in a manner that would subject us to additional tax. If any of these things were to happen, our results of operations and growth prospects, and the value of our ADSs, could be materially adversely affected.

We or certain of our subsidiaries may become subject to net income taxation in additional jurisdictions which would adversely affect our financial condition and the value of our ADSs.

We or one or more of our subsidiaries (including Skype Communications, through which we market and sell our products) may become treated as resident or as otherwise being engaged in a trade or business or having a permanent establishment in one or more jurisdictions in which we currently believe we or the relevant subsidiary is not so treated. If that were to happen, we or the relevant subsidiary would be subject to net income taxation in that jurisdiction on some or all of our or the relevant subsidiary’s income (depending on the jurisdiction and the circumstances). There could be many possible causes for such treatment, including activities indicating that management and control of our company or of the relevant subsidiaries are exercised in that jurisdiction, the nature of our activities and operations in that jurisdiction, or the location of our assets or use of our products in that jurisdiction. No assurance can be given that we will not be subject to such taxes retroactively or prospectively or that such taxes will not be substantial. The imposition of such taxes could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and accordingly on the value of our ADSs.

We may be subject to indirect taxes (such as value-added tax or sales tax) in jurisdictions in which we currently do not collect or pay such tax.

In the European Union, under the 6^th value-added tax, or VAT, directive, the place of supply for most of our electronically delivered products is Luxembourg, and therefore a 15% VAT rate applies, which is among the lowest in the European Union. This rule will be in effect until December 31, 2014, when the place of supply will shift to the place where the customer resides. This change may increase the ultimate cost of our products to E.U. resident customers and could decrease demand for our products. Moreover, such change will require to us to invest significant amounts in developing and modifying our technological and administrative systems to enable us to collect and remit VAT in multiple E.U. jurisdictions.

In countries outside of the European Union, we generally do not collect or remit VAT. Some countries outside of the European Union may, however, require us to collect and remit VAT, which could be burdensome or expensive for us to administer and increase the costs of our products or reduce our profitability or result in losses. For example, tax authorities in Switzerland have notified us that we should collect and remit VAT from our users with a Swiss billing address. At present, we remit VAT to Switzerland, but we do not collect the VAT from our Swiss users and, as a result, we absorb the cost of VAT, which adversely affects our results of operations.

In the United States, the subsidiary through which we market and sell most of our products, Skype Communications, does not at present collect or remit U.S. state or municipal taxes (such as sales, excise, utility, use or ad valorem taxes), fees or surcharges in respect of sales to our U.S. customers. However, we have occasionally received inquiries from a small number of state and municipal taxing authorities seeking payment of taxes, fees or surcharges that are traditionally applied to, or collected from, customers of providers of traditional public switched telephone network services. In addition, U.S. federal regulators have inquired into whether Skype properly remits payments to the federal universal service fund.

With respect to a U.S. state’s ability to impose obligations to collect taxes, fees or surcharges with respect to sales made over the Internet, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Quill Corporation v. North Dakota currently requires that a taxpayer have physical presence within the state before the state can collect such taxes. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has provided little guidance as to what levels of contacts constitute a physical presence, and no assurance can be given that we will not be found to have a physical presence in certain U.S. states based on, for example, our affiliations with other businesses that have a physical presence in the state.

Furthermore, a number of states, as well as the U.S. Congress, have been considering or have adopted initiatives that could limit the Supreme Court’s position regarding sales and use taxes on Internet sales. If these initiatives are successful, we could be required to collect sales and use taxes in a number of states or change our business practices. The imposition by state and local governments of various taxes, fees and surcharges upon Internet commerce could result in administrative burden, put us at a competitive disadvantage if similar obligations are not imposed on all or substantially all of our online competitors and affect negatively our future sales.

In addition, several proposals have been made at the U.S. federal, state and local levels that would impose additional taxes on communications through the Internet. These proposals, if adopted, could substantially impair our growth and substantially increase the costs of our products. In particular, the tax status of our products could subject us to conflicting taxation requirements and complexity with regard to the collection and remittance of VAT, sales or use taxes. Furthermore, given the international nature of our business, we may incur significant costs in developing and modifying our technological and administrative systems to enable us to collect and remit taxes in such a manner that applies only to the relevant taxable activity.

Any of these developments could adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our ADSs.

Governments may levy new taxes on us which could adversely affect our financial condition and the value of our shares.

The current economic downturn has created or exacerbated budget deficits for many governments. Governments may seek to address these budget issues in part by imposing new taxes on businesses, including ours. Any such additional taxes could harm our results of operations.

We may be unable to use some or all of our net operating loss carryforwards, which could adversely affect our reported financial condition and results of operations and therefore the value of our ADSs.

As of December 31, 2009, we had net operating loss carryforwards of $2.0 billion, which primarily consisted of $1.8 billion net operating loss carryforwards recognized in Luxembourg and $0.2 billion net

operating losses recognized in Ireland (which we currently do not expect to utilize as our Irish subsidiary does not generate taxable income). Our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards may be limited for a number of reasons, including insufficient future taxable income at the relevant entity. For this reason, we periodically establish valuation allowances in respect of our net operating loss carryforwards. However, the recognition of valuation allowances requires significant judgment, and the valuation allowances we have recognized may be insufficient in the event we are able to use less net operating losses than previously estimated.

We are subject to income taxes in Luxembourg, the United States and various other jurisdictions. The determination of our worldwide provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities requires estimation and significant judgment and there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Furthermore, our determination of our tax liability is always subject to audit and review by applicable domestic and foreign tax authorities, and we currently have “open” tax years that could become subject to audits, investigations and reviews by taxing authorities throughout the world. Any adverse outcome of any such audit or review could have a negative effect on our business, operating results and financial condition, and the ultimate tax outcome may differ from the amounts recorded in our financial statements and may materially adversely affect our reported financial results in the period or periods for which such determination is made.

Problems with or price increases by third parties who provide services to us or to our users could harm our business.

We rely on telecommunications providers to provide certain of our products. A number of parties, many of whom compete with us, provide services to us or to our users that we rely on to offer our products. We have agreements with a number of telecommunications providers in order for us to provide many of our paid products, including our SkypeOut and SkypeIn products. The quality of calls made by our users to and received by our users from landline and mobile phones depends in large part of the call quality of the relevant landline or mobile network. As a result, if these third parties do not provide sufficiently high quality services, our call quality may be negatively affected which may in turn adversely impact our brand, reputation and consumer acceptance of our products. In addition, price increases by companies that provide services to us or our users could harm our results of operations.

We outsource certain functions to third parties and if they do not perform satisfactorily, our business may be harmed. We have outsourced elements of certain functions to third-party providers, including payment processing and the support of certain mobile operations. If these third-party service providers do not perform satisfactorily or cease operations or are otherwise unable to provide these services, our operations could be disrupted, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. In that regard, we rely on third parties to provide all of the credit card payment processing for our paid products with Bibit BV, an affiliate of Royal Bank of Scotland, and PayPal, an eBay subsidiary, handling an aggregate of approximately 80% of the processing of our net revenues. If our third party payment processor ceased to provide these services to us, we would need to transition to an alternate provider which would require us to integrate our IT systems with the IT systems of the replacement provider. In addition, we would need to negotiate a new contract within a very short timeframe which could result in terms that are less favorable to us.

We have recently started to license our application programming interfaces and software to third parties, and actions these third parties take may harm us. In July 2010, we released SkypeKit, a software development kit that allows independent software developers and consumer electronics manufacturers to incorporate Skype capabilities with their own applications and devices. Such third party developers and manufacturers may make available software, hardware, services, features, systems and solutions that operate with our Internet communications products in breach of our licensing agreements and/or applicable laws or regulations. Such third party products may further be used to offer our products to users in ways that may adversely affect our regulatory positioning, product security, user experience and brand image, and breach laws such as consumer protection, user privacy and data protection laws and intellectual property or other third party rights.

Our business may be adversely affected by factors that cause our users to spend less time using our products, including seasonal factors, worker migration patterns, national events and increased usage of other websites.

Anything that diverts our users from their customary level of usage of our products could adversely affect our business. Our results of operations historically have been seasonal because many of our users reduce their use of our products with the onset of good weather during the summer months and our users tend to use our products more in the fourth quarter during the holiday season. Our rapid growth may have overshadowed whatever seasonal factors might have influenced our business to date. In addition, if worker migration patterns change, our business may be affected. For example, if fewer workers seek work outside their home country due to the current economic recession or otherwise, the volume of international calling may decline. In addition, increased usage of social networking websites may decrease the amount of time users spend using our communications products, which could adversely affect our financial results.

Part of our strategy is to expand our products for business customers, expand our mobile products, and attract third-party developers and other companies to extend the functionality of our products. If these initiatives are not successful, our business may suffer.

Our strategy contemplates expanded products for the business market, which is a more difficult market for us to penetrate. Business customers have different needs and often have more demanding expectations than consumers, and we will likely need to add product features and provide more consistent quality, among other things, in order to attract business customers. For example, we have historically not offered robust customer service. Although we have recently enhanced our capabilities in this area, these enhancements may not be sufficient to meet business customer expectations. Initiatives to attract business customers may be costly, and we may not be able to recover the costs incurred. In addition, many business vendors offer unified communication systems that include products we do not offer, such as email. These vendors also are recognized brands in the business marketplace and have incumbent status, including, in certain cases, long-term customer contracts, and as a result, it may be difficult for us to replace them. In addition, in-house information technology staff may be more familiar with the products of enterprise vendors, which also may make it more difficult to displace them. If we are unable to successfully develop and market products to business customers, our results of operations may suffer.

Our strategy depends on our ability to continue to offer our products on a mobile platform, and mobile network operators may be reluctant to partner with us. Our business strategy depends on our ability to continue to offer our products on a mobile platform. Mobile network operators may be reluctant to partner with us or allow our products to be used on their devices due to concerns about cannibalizing their business. We have already faced such reluctance by mobile network operators, particularly in European markets, in relation to VoIP and peer-to-peer applications generally.

Similarly, mobile hardware manufacturers and applications store providers may be reluctant to sell Skype mobile products in their application stores due to a concern of jeopardizing established relationships with their major hardware customers and mobile network operators. Application store owners have ultimate control over the products and services made available through their channels and may choose to remove Skype from their stores or restrict functionality based on perceived competitive threat or cannibalization of their own products. For example, although our application for the Apple iPad, iPhone and iTouch is currently enabled to make voice communications over 3G networks, Apple or its carrier partners may choose to alter the terms of inclusion in its application store, effectively withdrawing this functionality at any time or develop competing applications, such as Apple Face Time, that may better integrate with Apple’s devices.

Third party developers and other companies may not develop applications to extend our platform. Our strategy contemplates attracting third party developers and other companies to use our application programming interfaces to extend our platform; however, this is a recent initiative for us and we may not be able to attract developers and other companies interested in developing applications for our platform.

Our costs will increase significantly as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to complying with public company regulations.

Skype was acquired by eBay on October 14, 2005 and operated as an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of eBay until the effective date of the Skype Acquisition on November 19, 2009. We have operated as a privately held company since the effective date of the Skype Acquisition. After this offering, we will become obligated to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) annual and other reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We will also be required to ensure that we have the ability to prepare financial statements that are fully compliant with all applicable reporting requirements on a timely basis. In addition, we will also become subject to other reporting and corporate governance requirements, including certain requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, and certain provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the regulations promulgated under Sarbanes-Oxley, which will impose significant compliance obligations upon us.

Sarbanes-Oxley, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market, have imposed increased regulation and disclosure and required enhanced corporate governance practices of public companies. Our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards in this regard are likely to result in increased expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. These changes will require a significant commitment of additional resources. We may not be successful in implementing these requirements and implementing them could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we fail to implement the requirements with respect to our internal accounting and audit functions, our ability to report our operating results on a timely and accurate basis could be impaired. If we do not implement such requirements in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we might be subject to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or the Nasdaq Stock Market. Any such action could harm our reputation and the confidence of investors and users in our company and could materially adversely affect our business and cause the market price of our ADSs to fall.

In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be harmed.

We also expect that being a public company and these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee and compensation committee, and qualified executive officers.

Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

As a public company, we will be required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, which will require annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and, beginning with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, a report by our independent registered public accounting firm that addresses the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. During the course of our testing, we may identify deficiencies which we may not be able to remediate in time to meet our deadline for compliance with Section 404 or that may require a restatement or other revision to our financial statements. Testing and maintaining internal control can divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of our business. We also expect that the imposition of these regulations will increase

our legal and financial compliance costs, make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified officers and members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and make some activities more difficult, time consuming and costly. We may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 or our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able or willing to issue an unqualified report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective, we cannot be certain that our financial statements are accurate. If either we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report as required by Section 404, then investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our ADSs. In addition, if we do not maintain effective internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial information on a timely basis, which could harm the trading price of our ADSs, impair our ability to raise additional capital, or jeopardize our continued listing on Nasdaq Stock Market or any other stock exchange on which our ADSs may be listed.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable rate indebtedness and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness.

As of June 30, 2010, we had $727.9 million of debt outstanding under our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Management—Indebtedness.” Subject to restrictions in our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement, we may incur additional indebtedness.

Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

Our credit agreement imposes significant restrictions on our business and the lenders are entitled to take possession of and sell the assets we have pledged as collateral if there is a default under the credit agreement.

Our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants imposing significant restrictions on our business. These restrictions may affect our ability to operate our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise. The restrictions placed on us include limitations, among other things, on our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to:

Our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement also requires us to meet an interest expense coverage ratio test and a leverage ratio test. Our ability to meet these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain these ratios at all relevant times.

In addition, under our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement, we may be required to prepay outstanding term loans in a number of circumstances, including if we receive net proceeds arising from the sale or transfer of assets and properties (such sale and transfer would not, however, include this offering) or the incurrence of additional indebtedness. In addition, after the end of each fiscal year, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, we will be required to prepay outstanding term loans with a percentage of our “excess cash flow,” calculated as set forth in our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement, if our leverage ratio exceeds pre-defined levels. If, as of the end of the fiscal year, our leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 3:1, we will be required to prepay outstanding term loans in the aggregate amount of 50% of our excess cash flow. If, as of the end of the fiscal year, our leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 2.25:1 but less than 3:1, we will be required to prepay outstanding term loans in the aggregate amount of 25% of our excess cash flow. If our leverage ratio is less than 2.25:1 as of the end of the fiscal year, we will not be required to prepay outstanding term loans with excess cash flow for that year.

The foregoing restrictions could limit our ability to plan for, or react to, changes in market conditions or our capital needs. If for any reason we are unable to meet these requirements, we may not be granted waivers under, or amendments to, our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement or we may not be able to refinance our indebtedness on terms acceptable to us, or at all. The breach of any of these restrictions, covenants or prepayment requirements could result in a default under our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our obligations under the Amended Five Year Credit Agreement are secured by pledges of all share capital held by Skype Global and certain of our subsidiaries, and by security interests in substantially all of our tangible and intangible assets (with certain exceptions, including deposit accounts, other bank or securities accounts and other assets already subject to security interests). On occurrence of an event of default, the loans may be accelerated and declared due and payable immediately and the lenders would be entitled to take possession of and sell the assets we have pledged as collateral and to apply the proceeds from those sales to repay loans and other amounts due under the Amended Five Year Credit Agreement. For more information on our outstanding indebtedness, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Management—Indebtedness” elsewhere in this prospectus.

A significant part of our historical financial results is unlikely to be representative of our results as a stand-alone company.

Skype was acquired by eBay on October 14, 2005 and operated as part of the eBay group until the effective date of the Skype Acquisition on November 19, 2009. Our financial results from October 14, 2005 to November 18, 2009 have been prepared from the accounting records of eBay using the historical basis of assets and liabilities of Skype Companies. As part of the eBay group, Skype received various services and support provided by eBay, including finance, legal, information technology systems, shared facilities and human resources. Although we have entered into agreements with eBay pursuant to which eBay has provided and will provide us

with similar services and support up to November 2010 (subject to any extension), administrative, general corporate and other expenses of our business have increased and may further increase substantially.

Our financial statements for the periods subsequent to October 14, 2005 and prior to November 19, 2009 include estimated allocations of certain eBay expenses including centralized legal, tax, treasury, information technology, employee costs, corporate services and other infrastructure costs, collectively referred to as “corporate allocations.” Although the corporate allocations have been determined on a basis that we considered to be reasonable reflections of the utilization of services provided or the benefit received by us, our actual expenses might have been higher, perhaps substantially, than those allocations had we operated as a stand-alone company for the periods presented. Accordingly, our financial statements for the periods subsequent to October 14, 2005 and prior to November 19, 2009 do not purport to reflect what our results of operations or financial position would have been had we operated as a stand-alone company during the periods presented nor do they purport to indicate what our results of operations or financial position will be as of any future date or for any future period.

In particular, we are a smaller and less diversified company than eBay, and we do not have access to financial and other resources comparable to those of eBay. As a separate, stand-alone company, we may be unable to obtain goods, technology and services at prices and on terms as favorable as those available prior to the Skype Acquisition.

We have entered into a tax cooperation agreement with eBay pursuant to which we may be required to pay eBay an indemnity if we engage in certain changes to our operations without eBay’s consent.

In connection with the Skype Acquisition, we entered into a tax cooperation agreement with eBay pursuant to which we have agreed to notify and collaborate with eBay if we propose material changes to our operations, including new business initiatives, changes to existing business models, mergers, acquisitions, disposition of stock or assets or material changes in the source or character of income. If in eBay’s reasonable judgment, such material changes may result in an increase in certain types of so-called Subpart F Income that eBay may be required to recognize in accordance with the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and if we implement such material change without eBay’s consent, we would need to pay eBay an indemnity equal to its tax liability arising from its pro rata share of such increase in these types of Subpart F Income for each taxable year in which eBay holds (directly, indirectly or constructively) 10% or more of our voting power and in which U.S. persons holding (directly, indirectly or constructively) 10% or more of our voting power hold (directly, indirectly or constructively) in the aggregate more than 50% of our shares by vote or value. Such indemnity may negatively affect our results of operation and we may forego certain restructurings or new business opportunities or might choose to structure new business opportunities in a more expensive way in order to avoid paying such indemnity.

We will become a Luxembourg joint stock company (“société anonyme”) upon our corporate reorganization and it may be difficult for you to obtain or enforce judgments against us or our executive officers and directors in the United States.

We are organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Most of our assets are located outside the United States. Furthermore, some of our directors and officers named in this prospectus reside outside the United States and most of their assets are located outside the United States. As a result, investors may find it difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon us or these persons or to enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against us or these persons in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it may also be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against us or these persons in courts located in jurisdictions outside the United States, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S.

federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for an investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against us or these persons. Luxembourg law, furthermore, does not recognize a shareholder’s right to bring a derivative action on behalf of the company.

As there is no treaty in force on the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters between the United States and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, courts in Luxembourg will not automatically recognize and enforce a final judgment rendered by a U.S. court. The enforceability in Luxembourg courts of judgments entered by U.S. courts will be subject to the conditions set forth in the Luxembourg procedural code which may include the following conditions:

Under our articles of incorporation, we indemnify and hold our directors harmless against all claims and suits brought against them, subject to limited exceptions. Under our articles of incorporation, to the extent allowed by law, the rights and obligations among or between us, any of our current or former directors and officers shall be governed exclusively by the laws of Luxembourg and subject to the jurisdiction of the Luxembourg courts, unless such rights or obligations do not relate to or arise out of their capacities listed above. Although there is doubt as to whether U.S. courts would enforce such provision in an action brought in the United States under U.S. securities laws, such provision could make enforcing judgments obtained outside Luxembourg more difficult to enforce against our assets in Luxembourg or jurisdictions that would apply Luxembourg law.

Our shareholders may have more difficulty protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a U.S. corporation.

Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of incorporation and by the laws governing joint stock companies organized under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of our directors and officers under Luxembourg law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States. There may be less publicly available information about us than is regularly published by or about U.S. issuers. Also, Luxembourg regulations governing the securities of Luxembourg companies may not be as extensive as those in effect in the United States, and Luxembourg law and regulations in respect of corporate governance matters might not be as protective of minority shareholders as state corporation laws in the United States. Therefore, our shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our directors and officers or our principal shareholders than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States. Please see “Description of Share Capital” for a discussion of differences between Luxembourg and Delaware corporate law.

Luxembourg law authorizes our shareholders to nominate corporate directors.

Under Luxembourg law, our shareholders may nominate a corporation or other legal entity as a member of our board of directors, to which we refer as a “corporate director.” While a corporate director assumes all responsibility

of an individual director, the corporate director may benefit from limited liability as a corporate director or other limited liability entity, as the case may be and our shareholders may not be able to successfully pursue any rights they may have against the individuals representing a corporate director in the decisions taken by our board of directors or the members, shareholders or other equity owners of such corporate director. Currently, our Board of Directors includes two corporate directors, Joltid Limited and M.F.A. Mulder Beheer B.V.

You may not be able to participate in equity offerings, and you may not receive any value for rights that we may grant.

Pursuant to Luxembourg corporate law, existing shareholders are generally entitled to preemptive subscription rights in the event of capital increases and issues of shares against cash contributions. However, under our articles of incorporation, our board of directors has been authorized to waive, limit or suppress such pre-emptive subscription rights until and the general meeting of our shareholders may renew, expand or amend such authorization. In addition, under the deposit agreement for the ADSs and applicable law, the depositary will not offer these rights to ADS holders unless both the rights and the underlying securities to be distributed to ADS holders are either registered or exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), with respect to all holders of ADSs. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect to any such rights or underlying securities or to endeavor to cause such a registration statement to be declared effective. In addition, we may not be able to take advantage of any exemptions from registration under the Securities Act. Accordingly, holders of our ADSs and ordinary shares may be unable to participate in our rights offerings and issue of shares and may experience dilution of their holdings as a result. If the depositary is unable to sell preemptive subscription rights corresponding to ordinary shares represented by ADSs that are not exercised by, or distributed to, ADS holders, or if the sale of these rights is not lawful or reasonably practicable, the depositary will allow the rights to lapse, in which case ADS holders will receive no value for these rights.

Control by principal shareholders could adversely affect our other shareholders.

When this offering is completed, our executive officers, directors and greater than 5% shareholders, collectively, will beneficially own approximately % of ordinary shares (including ordinary shares represented by ADSs) (based on the number of ordinary shares outstanding as of 2010 and excluding ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options), assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional ADSs. In addition, we expect that, pursuant to the terms of the Shareholders Agreement that we expect to be amended prior to this offering, certain Silver Lake funds, eBay International AG, CPP Investment Board Private Holdings Inc. and Joltid Limited will be able to elect their respective designees to serve as members of our board of directors. These shareholders will have a continuing ability to control our board of directors and will continue to have significant influence over our affairs for the foreseeable future, including controlling the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or our assets.

In addition, under the “controlled company” exception to the independence requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market, we will be exempt from the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market that require that our board of directors be comprised of a majority of independent directors, that we have a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors and that we have a nominating and governance committee comprised solely of independent directors. This concentrated control will limit the ability of other shareholders to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may take actions that our other shareholders do not view as beneficial. For example, this concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could cause the market price of our ADSs to decline or prevent our shareholders from realizing a premium over the market price for their ADSs.

Prior to this offering, our ordinary shares or ADSs have not been traded in the public markets. We cannot predict the extent to which a trading market for our ADSs will develop or how liquid that market might become. An active trading market for our ADSs may never develop or may not be sustained, which could adversely affect your ability to sell your ADSs and the market price of your ADSs. The initial public offering price for the ADSs was determined by negotiations between us, the selling stockholder and the underwriters and does not purport to be indicative of prices at which our ADSs will trade upon completion of this offering.

The stock market in general, and the market for equities of some technology companies, early stage companies and Internet companies in particular, has been highly volatile. As a result, the market price of our ADSs is likely to be similarly volatile, and investors in our ADSs may experience a decrease, which could be substantial, in the value of their ADSs, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects, or a complete loss of their investment. The price of our ADSs could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including those listed elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section and others such as:

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against companies following periods of volatility in their stock price. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, and could also require us to make substantial payments to satisfy judgments or to settle or defend litigation.

A total of or % of our total outstanding ordinary shares (including ordinary shares represented by ADSs) after the offering are restricted from immediate resale, but may be sold on a stock exchange in the near future. The large number of ordinary shares or ADSs eligible for public sale or subject to rights requiring us to register them for public sale could depress the market price of our ADSs.

The market price of our ADSs could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our ordinary shares or ADSs in the market after this offering, and the perception that these sales could occur may also depress

the market price of our ADSs. We will have ordinary shares outstanding (including ordinary shares represented by ADSs) after this offering, assuming no exercise of our outstanding options or warrants. Of these shares, ordinary shares represented by ADSs sold in this offering will be freely tradable in the United States, except for any ordinary shares purchased by our “affiliates” as defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933.

The holders of shares of outstanding ordinary shares or ADSs have agreed with the underwriters, subject to a number of exceptions, not to dispose of or hedge any of their ordinary shares during the 180-day period beginning on the date of this prospectus, except with the prior written consent of the representatives of the underwriters in this offering. After the expiration of the 180-day restricted period, these shares and ADS, may be sold in the public market in the United States, subject to prior registration in the United States, if required, or reliance upon an exemption from U.S. registration, including, in the case of ordinary shares or ADSs held by affiliates, compliance with the volume restrictions of Rule 144. We expect ordinary shares to be subject to contractual transfer restrictions pursuant to the Shareholders Agreement, which we expect to be amended prior to this offering (see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement”).

Upon completion of this offering, the holders of ordinary shares, or % of our outstanding ordinary shares as of June 30, 2010, will be entitled, under contracts providing for registration rights, to require us to register our ordinary shares or ADSs owned by them with the SEC. Upon effectiveness of any registration statement, subject to lock-up agreements with the representatives of the underwriters, those ordinary shares or ADSs will be available for immediate resale in the United States in the open market.

Sales of our ordinary shares and ADSs as restrictions end or pursuant to registration rights may make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. These sales, or the perception that such sales could occur also could cause the market price for our ADSs to fall and make it more difficult for you to sell our ADSs.

Purchasers in this offering will immediately experience substantial dilution in net tangible book value of their ADSs.

The initial public offering price of our ADSs in this offering is considerably more than the net tangible book value per ADS. Purchasers in this offering will suffer immediate dilution of $ per ADS pro forma net tangible book value, based on the sale of ADSs to be sold in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per ADS (the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover of this preliminary prospectus). See “Dilution.”

After the completion of this offering, we do not expect to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

After the completion of this offering, we do not anticipate making any cash or other distributions on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. The payment of cash distributions on ordinary shares is restricted under the terms of our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement. In addition, because we are a holding company, our ability to make any distributions on ordinary shares may be limited by restrictions on our ability to obtain

sufficient funds from subsidiaries, including restrictions under the terms of our Amended Five Year Credit Agreement. Furthermore, under the laws of Luxembourg, we are able to make distributions only to the extent that we receive distributions from our subsidiaries, recognize gains from the sale of our assets or have available share premium. We anticipate that we will retain all of our available funds for use in the operation and development of our business. Accordingly, investors must rely on sales of their ADSs after price appreciation, which may never materialize, as the only way of realizing any future gains on their investments. Investors seeking cash or other distributions should not purchase our ADSs. See “Distribution Policy.”

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, if they adversely change their recommendations regarding our ADSs or if our operating results do not meet their expectations, the price of our ADSs could decline.

The market price of our ADSs will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the market price of our ADSs or its trading volume to decline. Moreover, if one or more of the analysts who cover our company downgrade our ADSs or if our operating results or prospects do not meet their expectations, the market price of our ADSs could decline.

Future equity issuances may dilute the holdings of current ordinary shareholders or ADS holders and could materially affect the market price of our ADSs.

We may in the future decide to offer additional equity to raise capital or for other purposes. Any such additional offering could reduce the proportionate ownership and voting interests of holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs, as well as our earnings per ordinary share or ADS and net asset value per ordinary share or ADS.

As a holder of our ADSs, you do not have the same rights as those of our ordinary shareholders, may not receive voting materials in time to be able to exercise your right to vote, may not receive distributions, if any, we make on our ordinary shares and will be required to pay certain fees and expenses.

Holders of ADSs do not have the same rights as those of our ordinary shareholders and may only exercise voting rights with respect to the underlying ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under our articles of incorporation, which will become effective prior to the closing of this offering, the minimum notice period required to convene a general meeting is eight days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient notice of a shareholders’ meeting to permit you to withdraw your ordinary shares to allow you to cast your vote with respect to any specific matter and both any such withdrawal and any subsequent deposit of those ordinary shares in exchange for ADSs will require that you pay fees to the depositary. In addition, the depositary and its agents may not be able to send voting instructions to you or carry out your voting instructions in a timely manner. We will make all reasonable efforts to cause the depositary to extend voting rights to you in a timely manner, but we cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote the ordinary shares underlying your ADSs. Furthermore, the depositary and its agents will not be responsible for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any vote is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may lack recourse if the ordinary shares underlying your ADSs are not voted as you requested. In addition, in your capacity as an ADS holder, you will not be able to call a shareholders’ meeting.

Holders of ADSs may not receive all of the distributions, if any, we make on our ordinary shares. For example, if we offer holders of our ordinary shares any rights to subscribe for additional ordinary shares or any other rights and if the depositary for the ADSs decides that it is not legal and practical to make those rights available to holders of ADSs and that is it is not practical to sell those rights and distribute the net proceeds to ADS holders, those rights will lapse and holders of ADSs will receive no value for them. Moreover, we generally

would be required to file a registration statement under the Securities Act in order for the depositary to make any rights available to ADS holders and we have no obligation to do so. Likewise, holders of ADSs may not receive the same property, if any, we distribute on our ordinary shares. For example, if we make a distribution of securities or property on our ordinary shares then, to the extent that the depositary deems the distribution of those securities or property to holders of ADSs not to be equitable and practical, it may sell those securities or property and distribute the net proceeds to holders of ADSs. In addition, holders of ADSs will be required to pay an annual fee for services performed by the depositary in administering our ADS program, a fee for any distributions made to ADS holders, a fee for exchanging ADSs for ordinary shares or ordinary shares for ADSs, and other specified fees and expenses. We may agree with the depositary to amend the depositary agreement without your consent for any reason.

As a result, holders of ADSs may not have the same voting and other rights as holders of our ordinary shares, may not receive the same distributions, if any, as holders of our ordinary shares and will be required to pay certain charges and expenses.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when its books are closed or when any such action is deemed necessary or advisable by the depositary or by us or because of any requirement of law or of any governmental body or commission. Moreover, the surrender of ADSs and withdrawal of our ordinary shares may be suspended pending the payment of fees, taxes and similar charges or if we direct the depositary at any time to cease new issuances and withdrawals of our shares during periods specified by us in connection with shareholders’ meetings, the payment of dividends or as otherwise reasonably necessary for compliance with any applicable laws or government regulations.

Our management will have considerable discretion as to the use of the net proceeds to be received by us from this offering.

Our allocation of the net proceeds to be received by us in this offering is based on current plans and business conditions. The amounts and timing of any expenditure will vary depending on the amount of cash generated by our operations and competitive and market developments, among other factors. Accordingly, our management will have considerable discretion in the application of the net proceeds received by us. The net proceeds may be used for corporate purposes that do not improve our profitability or increase the price of our ADSs. Net proceeds from this offering, pending allocation to operating assets, may be placed in investments that do not produce income or that lose value.

If you directly or indirectly acquire more than 10% of our outstanding shares, including in the form of ADSs, CFC rules may apply to you.

We expect that we and certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries will be controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”) for United States federal income tax purposes immediately following the offering. Each “U.S. shareholder” of a CFC that directly or indirectly owns shares in the CFC on the last day of the CFC’s taxable year must generally include in its gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes its pro rata share of the CFC’s “Subpart F income,” even if the Subpart F income is not distributed. For these purposes, any U.S. person who owns, directly, indirectly through foreign persons, or constructively (under applicable constructive ownership rules of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of shares of a foreign corporation will be considered to be a “United States shareholder” of the corporation. See “United States and Luxembourg Income Tax Considerations—United States Federal Income Tax Considerations—Controlled Foreign Corporation Rules.”

This prospectus includes forward-looking statements, including statements that involve expectations, plans or intentions (such as those relating to future business or financial results, new features or products, or management strategies). You can identify these forward-looking statements by words such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan” and other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, those described under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus, including in our financial statements and related notes appearing in this prospectus, and the following:

We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any of our forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in circumstances, assumptions or beliefs, or future events or circumstances. Given these risks and uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.

Unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, industry, market and demographic data appearing in this prospectus, including information relating to the telecommunications industry, are derived principally from publicly available information, industry publications, data from market research firms and other third-party sources and estimates by our management, and management estimates are based upon information from the foregoing sources, data from our internal research and assumptions made by us based on such data and our knowledge of our industry and markets. Our management estimates and internal research have not been verified by any independent source, and we have not independently verified any third-party information. While we believe the industry, market and demographic data included in this prospectus is generally reliable, such information is inherently imprecise. In addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of our future performance, industry or market conditions, and demographics are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in the estimates made by third parties and by us. If any one or more of these assumptions turn out to be incorrect, actual market results may differ from those predicted. While we do not know what impact any such differences may have on our business, if there are such differences, they could have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations and financial condition, and the trading price of our ADSs.

In connection with the termination of the management services agreements with certain of our shareholders and their affiliates, we will pay approximately $ million to such counterparties, on the date of the consummation of this offering, using a portion of the proceeds of this offering. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Management Services Agreements.”

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of approximately $ million of ADSs to be offered by the selling shareholders. See “Principal and Selling Shareholders.”

Prior to this offering, we have conducted our business through Skype Global S.à r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), and its subsidiaries. Skype S.à r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), and the registrant was formed for the purpose of making this offering. Skype S.à r.l., currently a wholly-owned subsidiary of Skype Global S.à r.l., does not engage in any operations and has only nominal assets, including a 100% interest of Skype Global Holdco S.à r.l., a Luxembourg limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), which itself does not engage in any operations and holds no material assets. The corporate reorganization will consist of the following principal steps:

See “Principal and Selling Shareholders” for more information on the ordinary shares held by our directors, named executive officers, more than 5% shareholders and selling shareholders. Investors in this offering will only receive, and this prospectus only describes the offering of, ADSs representing ordinary shares of Skype S.A. See “Description of Share Capital” for additional information regarding the terms of our certificate of incorporation and the rights attached to our ordinary shares.

In connection with the corporate reorganization, each outstanding stock option granted by Skype Global S.à r.l. to our employees, directors, service providers and consultants under the Skype Equity Incentive Plan will be assumed by Skype S.A. and converted into an equivalent stock option to purchase ordinary shares of Skype S.A. The Skype Equity Incentive Plan will also be assumed by Skype S.A. From and after the completion of this offering, each stock option will be deemed to constitute a stock option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable under the Skype Equity Incentive Plan, a number of Skype S.A. ordinary shares equal to the product of (1) the number of shares of Skype Global ordinary shares otherwise purchasable pursuant to such stock option and (2) , rounded down, if necessary, to the nearest whole share; and such stock option to acquire Skype S.A. ordinary shares will have an exercise price per share equal to (1) the exercise price per share of the Skype Global stock option, divided by (2) , rounded up to the nearest cent. After the completion of this offering, any employee, director, service provider or consultant acquiring ordinary shares of Skype S.A. pursuant to the exercise of a stock option will hold such shares directly and not through Skype Management L.P. as was required prior to the completion of this offering.

Our corporate reorganization will not affect our operations, which we will continue to conduct through our operating subsidiaries. The following chart reflects our corporate structure after consummation of this offering, after giving effect to the corporate reorganization:

We do not anticipate making any dividends or other distributions on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future. We anticipate that we will retain all of our available funds for use in the operation and development of our business. Any future determination to make dividends or other distributions will be at the discretion of the general meeting of our shareholders or, with respect to interim dividends or distributions, our board of directors, and will depend on, among other things, our financial condition, results of operations, cash needs, plans for expansion, tax considerations, available net profits and reserves, limitations under Luxembourg law and other factors that our board of directors considers to be relevant. In addition, covenants in instruments and agreements may restrict our ability to make cash, including the Amended Five Year Credit Agreement, or dividends or other distributions on our ordinary shares.

The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of June 30, 2010:

You should read the information in the following table together with “Corporate Reorganization,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

In connection with the Joltid Transaction, Joltid received warrants to purchase an additional 98,680 Skype Global shares, equivalent to a 1% equity stake at such time, exercisable until the earlier of November 19, 2019 or the closing of a reorganization event, as defined in the warrant agreement. On April 15, 2010, the warrants were transferred to SEP Investments Pty Limited, an entity unaffiliated with Joltid.

The exercise price of the warrants upon completion of this offering will be $ per ordinary share, and the holder of the warrants will be entitled to purchase ordinary shares of Skype S.A. following the closing of the offering. A reorganization event includes any transaction pursuant to which all or substantially all of Skype Global’s outstanding shares are sold, exchanged or converted into cash, securities or other consideration. A reorganization event, however, excludes transactions with affiliates of Skype Global and transactions where Skype Global’s shareholders prior to the reorganization event retain majority control of the surviving entity following such event. Upon the occurrence of a reorganization event, the warrant holder will receive such consideration with a fair market value equal to the difference between the amount the holder would have received in the reorganization event had it exercised all of its warrants immediately prior to such event, less the amount it would have had to pay to exercise the warrants. The corporate reorganization described elsewhere in this prospectus is not a reorganization event under the warrant agreement, but instead Skype S.A. will assume the warrants and the warrant holder will have a right thereunder to a number of Skype S.A. shares equal to the number of shares that the holder would have received had it exercised the warrants immediately prior to the corporate reorganization.

If you invest in our ADSs, your ownership interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per ADS and the net tangible book value per ADS upon the completion of this offering. Net tangible book value represents our total tangible assets (total assets less intangible assets) less total liabilities.

Our net tangible book value at June 30, 2010, after giving effect to the sale of ADSs at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per ADS (the midpoint of the estimated initial public offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) and after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us, or “as adjusted net tangible book value”, would have been $ , or $ per ordinary share or $ per ADS. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $ per ordinary share or $ per ADS to existing shareholders and an immediate dilution of $ per ordinary share or $ per ADS to new investors, or % of the assumed initial public offering price of $ per ordinary share or $ per ADS. The following table illustrates this dilution for investors in ADSs in this offering:

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per ADS would increase (decrease) our as adjusted net tangible book value by $ , the as adjusted net tangible book value per ADS by $ and the dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per ADS to investors in this offering by $ , assuming that the number of ADSs offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The following table summarizes, as of June 30, 2010, the number of ordinary shares (in the form of ordinary shares or ADSs) purchased from us since inception, the total consideration paid to us and the average price per ordinary share and per ADS paid by existing shareholders and by new investors purchasing in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $ per ADS (the midpoint of the estimated initial public offering price range set forth on the front cover page of this prospectus), before deducting underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price per ADS would increase or decrease, respectively, the total consideration paid by new investors by $ .

If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase an additional ADSs in this offering, the number of ordinary shares represented by ADSs held by new investors will increase to approximately ordinary shares, or approximately % of the total number of our then outstanding ordinary shares (including ordinary shares represented by ADSs), and the total consideration paid by new investors will increase to approximately $ , or approximately % of the total consideration paid for our outstanding ordinary shares (in the form of ordinary shares or ADSs), assuming an initial public offering price of $ per ADS (the mid-point of the estimated price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus).

The foregoing discussion and tables assume the completion, prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, of our corporate reorganization and that the number of ordinary shares that will be outstanding immediately after this offering is based on ordinary shares outstanding on June 30, 2010, plus the ordinary shares to be sold by us in the form of ADSs in this offering, and excludes the following ordinary shares:

To the extent that any of the foregoing warrants and options are exercised, there may be further dilution to investors in this offering.

The following selected financial information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information,” our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and for the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009, the Predecessor period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009, and as of and for the Predecessor year ended December 31, 2008 and for the Predecessor year ended December 31, 2007, as well as our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the six month Successor period ended June 30, 2010 and for the six month Predecessor period ended June 30, 2009, and their respective notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

In addition, on October 14, 2005, eBay acquired the Skype Companies (with the exception of Skype Holdings, which eBay formed to consummate the acquisition in 2005; one of the Skype Companies, Sonorit, which eBay acquired in April 2006; and certain indirect subsidiaries of Skype Global incorporated subsequent to the acquisition by eBay) (which we refer to as the “eBay Acquisition”). Accordingly, the selected financial results for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been presented for the pre-eBay predecessor entity (which we refer to as the “Pre-eBay Predecessor”) prior to the eBay Acquisition for the period from January 1, 2005 to October 13, 2005 and for the Predecessor following the eBay Acquisition for the period from October 14, 2005 to December 31, 2005.

Our selected statement of operations data and cash flows data for the Predecessor years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009 and for the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009, as well as the Predecessor balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 and the Successor balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009, have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) and are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The selected statement of operations data below for the Pre-eBay Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 to October 13, 2005, for the Predecessor period from October 14, 2005 to December 31, 2005 and for the Predecessor year ended December 31, 2006, as well as the Predecessor combined balance sheet data below as of December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, are derived from unaudited financial statements that were prepared on the basis of U.S. GAAP. The selected statement of operations data below as of and for the six month Successor period ended June 30, 2010 and for the six month Predecessor period ended June 30, 2009 are unaudited and have been prepared under U.S. GAAP.

The Predecessor financial statements include 100% of the assets and liabilities of the Skype Companies and have been presented on a combined basis. The Predecessor financial statements include allocations of certain

eBay expenses including centralized legal, tax, treasury, information technology, employee costs, corporate services and other infrastructure costs, collectively referred to as “corporate allocations.” The corporate allocations have been determined on a basis that we considered to be reasonable reflections of the utilization of services provided to us or the benefit received by us. Additionally, certain other expenses incurred by eBay for the direct benefit of the Predecessor have been included in the Predecessor financial statements. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” and Note 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We believe that the estimates, assumptions, and methodology underlying the allocation of these expenses as reflected in the Predecessor financial statements are reasonable; however, actual expenses may have differed materially from these allocations had the Predecessor operated independently of eBay for the periods presented. The Predecessor financial statements and selected financial data do not purport to reflect what the results of operations, financial position or cash flows would have been had the Predecessor operated as an independent company during the periods presented nor do they purport to indicate what the Successor results of operations, cash flows or financial position will be as of any future date or for any future period.

Selected Statement of Operations Data for the Six Month Successor Period ended June 30, 2010 and the Six Month Predecessor Period ended June 30, 2009

Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be achieved for the entire year.

Our registered user metric is subject to a degree of overstatement. Other metrics are subject to uncertainties and inaccuracies and may be overstated or understated. For more information, see “Risk Factors—The number of our registered users overstates the number of unique individuals who register to use our products,” “—Our connected users metric is subject to uncertainties and may overstate the number of users who actively use our products,” “—Our paying user and communications services billing minutes metrics are subject to a degree of inaccuracy due to fraudulent transactions and our method of calculating these metrics.” and “—The peer-to-peer nature of our software architecture makes it difficult to determine certain operational metrics.”

We describe below how we calculate each of these metrics, as well as certain key assumptions relating to these metrics. We exclude from our registered, connected and paying user metrics those users that have become users through non-controlled entities in which we hold a minority interest because they do not contribute to net revenues in our statement of operations. As we present average revenue per paying user as a related metric, we believe it would not be appropriate to include paying users of such entities in this metric. Accordingly, we exclude registered, connected and paying users of our only non-controlled entity, Tel-Online Limited, which is our Chinese investment in which we hold a 49% interest and our partner, Tom Online, holds a majority interest. We also exclude from our communications services billing minutes metric minutes of Skype users through Tel-Online Limited.

Registered users. We calculate registered users as the cumulative number of user accounts at the end of the relevant period. The registered user figure overstates the number of unique users because, among other things, users may register more than once and, as a result, may have more than one account and some users engage in fraudulent activities that result in the creation of spurious user accounts.

Connected users. We calculate connected users as the number of user accounts, averaged over a three month period, that log in to the Skype software client, either manually or automatically, in a given calendar month. We also include in connected users the number of users, averaged over a three month period, who have a valid Skype software certificate (for example, a mobile phone with the Skype software client installed) that is checked and has been validated during the past thirty days.

The number of connected users is subject to uncertainties and may not be indicative of users actively using our products during a given period. For example, for a number of our users, once a user has downloaded our software onto their device, the software will automatically be logged in to when the device is turned on even if the customer takes no steps to affirmatively engage our software client after initial registration. In addition, a number of connected users in a given period includes the creation and use of spurious user accounts. By contrast, users accessing Skype from behind a firewall may not be captured in our systems as connected users.

Paying users. We calculate paying users as the number of unique user accounts, averaged over a three month period, who make a successful SkypeOut call using Skype credit on a pay-as-you-go basis in a given calendar month or that had an active subscription at any time during such calendar month. A user need not be logged in to the Skype software client to be considered as having made a successful SkypeOut call; for example, the user may utilize our Skype-to-Go or Call Forwarding paid products, which do not require users to log in to the Skype software client. Thus, there may be user accounts in a particular period that are counted as paying users but are not counted as connected users. We strive to eliminate from our number of paying users any users who only made SkypeOut calls utilizing promotional, free Skype credit or promotional subscriptions services. Our operational systems may fail to classify properly these users, and accordingly this metric is subject to potential inaccuracies.

Communications services billing minutes. We calculate communications services billing minutes as the cumulative number of minutes that Skype users were connected to our communications services products, which mainly comprise billing minutes related to SkypeOut calls to traditional fixed-line or mobile telephones during a relevant period. A user does not need to be logged in to the Skype software client to register a billing minute; for example, the user may make a Skype-to-Go call or use Call Forwarding, which do not require users to log in to the Skype software client. Due to the rounding up of our billing system, this number will exceed the aggregate number of minutes of such calls our users made. We strive to eliminate from this number minutes attributable to SkypeOut calls made utilizing promotional, free Skype credit or promotional subscriptions services, or other free calls. Our operational systems may fail to classify properly these minutes, and accordingly this metric is subject to potential inaccuracies.

Skype-to-Skype minutes. We define Skype-to-Skype minutes as an estimate of the number of minutes in which a Skype user is simultaneously connected via a free Skype call with another Skype user. We derive this by collecting reports at regular intervals from selected points in the Skype user network and aggregating them in order to quantify the number of parallel calls. The estimated activity is designed to count one Skype-to-Skype minute per minute of conversation between two simultaneous users on a call, and 0.5 Skype-to-Skype minutes per minute of conversation for each additional user on a multi-party call involving three or more users.

The table below shows our registered users as of the relevant dates specified below as well as the average monthly connected users and average monthly paying users for the three months ended on the relevant dates specified below. Unless otherwise specified, the terms “average monthly connected user” and “average monthly paying user” as used below and in this prospectus represent a three month average of the relevant user metrics for each month within the period. Therefore, our average monthly connected users and our average monthly paying users are shown for the three months ending each period, which represents the sum of the monthly connected user and monthly paying user figures, respectively, for each individual month, divided by three.

The table below shows average communications services revenue per paying user for each of the periods presented. Average communications services revenue per paying user for a given fiscal year represents our net revenues derived from our communications services for such year divided by the average paying users for such year. For these purposes, “paying users” represent the average of the average monthly paying users for each of the four quarters in the relevant fiscal year. In addition, for purposes of comparison on an annual basis, the average communications services revenue per paying user for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 has been converted into annualized figures for the years 2009 and 2010 based on the six month net revenues in those years.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2009 have been developed by applying pro forma adjustments to our historical consolidated financial statements for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2009 to November 18, 2009, the Successor period from November 19, 2009 to December 31, 2009 and the Predecessor period from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. For presentation purposes, we refer in this prospectus to the Predecessor’s combined financial statements and the Successor’s consolidated financial statements collectively as our “consolidated financial statements.”

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information for the year ended December 31, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2009 gives effect to the Skype Acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2009 and excludes certain non-recurring charges associated with the Skype Acquisition. The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is presented for informational purposes only. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information, which has been prepared and presented in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X, does not purport to represent what our actual consolidated results of operations would have been had the Skype Acquisition actually occurred on the date indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of future consolidated results of operations. The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with the information contained in “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. All pro forma adjustments and their underlying assumptions are described more fully in the notes to our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2009


Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨



Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered⁽¹⁾	Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price⁽²⁾⁽³⁾	Registration Fee
Ordinary shares, par value $0.01 per ordinary share	$100,000,000	$7,130


	Per ADS	Total
Initial public offering price	$	$

Underwriting discounts and commissions	$	$

Proceeds, before expenses, to Skype S.A.	$	$

Proceeds, before expenses, to the selling shareholders	$	$


BofA Merrill Lynch		Barclays Capital		Citi		Credit Suisse		Deutsche Bank Securities


Number of Shares and % of Total Outstanding		Date Available for Sale into Public Markets
,or %		Immediately after this offering.

,or %		180 days after the date of this prospectus due to contractual obligations and lock-up agreements between the holders of these shares and the underwriters. However, the representatives of the underwriters can waive the provisions of these lock-up agreements and allow these shareholders to sell their shares or ADSs at any time, provided applicable holding period under Rule 144 have expired.


Lazard Capital Markets		RBC Capital Markets		UBS Investment Bank


		Page
Prospectus Summary		1
Risk Factors		23
Forward-Looking Statements		64
Market Data		65
Use of Proceeds		66
Corporate Reorganization		67
Dividend Policy		69
Capitalization		70
Dilution		72
Selected Financial Data		74
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information		83
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		86
Business		130
Management		165
Executive Compensation		174
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions		193
Principal and Selling Shareholders		200
Description of Share Capital		203
Description of American Depositary Shares		211
Comparison of Shareholder Rights		219
Shares Eligible for Future Sale		233
United States and Luxembourg Income Tax Considerations		235
Underwriting		244
Validity of Securities		248
Experts		248
Where You Can Find More Information		248
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-1


	As of June 30, 2010
	Actual			As Adjusted
	(thousands of U.S. dollars) (unaudited)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	85,493		$

Total outstanding debt⁽¹⁾	$	727,912		$

Shareholder’s equity:
Common stock classes A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J, $0.01 par value, 944,495 shares of each of the 10 classes issued, authorized and outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (actual); ordinary shares, $0.01 par value, shares authorized, shares issued and outstanding (as adjusted)⁽²⁾		94
Management co-investment loan receivable		(4,305	)
Additional paid-in capital		2,326,832
Warrants		17,214
Accumulated deficit		(86,600	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,119

Total shareholders’ equity		2,254,354

Total capitalization	$	2,982,266		$


Assumed initial public offering price per ADS		$
Net tangible book value per ADS as of June 30, 2010, before giving effect to this offering	$
Increase in net tangible book value per ADS attributable to this offering	$

As adjusted net tangible book value per ADS		$

Dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per ADS to investors in this offering		$


	Shares Purchased			Total Consideration			Average Price
	Number	Percent		Amount	Percent		Per Share	Per ADS
Existing shareholders		%		$	%		$	$
New investors

Total		100	%	$	100	%


	Predecessor								Successor
	As of December 31,								As of December 31, 2009			As of June 30, 2010
	2005		2006		2007		2008		As of December 31, 2009			As of June 30, 2010
	(thousands of U.S. dollars)
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	88,156	$	92,837	$	115,884	$	260,187	$	114,077	⁽¹⁾	$	85,493
Total current assets		107,352		121,953		154,234		319,804		202,445			182,586
Property and equipment, net		1,023		7,123		9,075		6,040		13,238			19,252
Goodwill		2,312,359		2,575,931		1,919,341		1,836,562		2,372,779	⁽²⁾		2,372,779
Intangible assets, net		263,406		235,711		188,204		112,934		788,118	⁽³⁾		712,903
Total assets		2,684,286		2,944,758		2,275,410		2,282,535		3,409,704			3,312,817

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		20,187		39,658		46,359		65,159		90,852			99,548
Deferred revenue and user advances		22,429		56,219		89,419		108,012		142,600			150,250
Total current liabilities		52,684		111,740		170,463		219,893		302,246			317,272
Long term debt⁽⁴⁾		—		—		—		—		772,220			690,107
Total liabilities		115,694		150,730		186,007		222,493		1,172,131			1,058,463
Total invested / shareholders’ equity		2,568,592		2,794,028		2,089,403		2,060,042		2,237,573			2,254,354
Total liabilities and invested / shareholders’ equity	$	2,684,286	$	2,944,758	$	2,275,410	$	2,282,535	$	3,409,704		$	3,312,817


	As of or for the three months ended, as applicable,
	December 31, 2007	December 31, 2008	December 31, 2009	June 30, 2009	June 30, 2010
	(millions)
Registered users⁽¹⁾	217	325	474	397	560
Average monthly connected users⁽²⁾	52	75	105	91	124
Average monthly paying users	4.6	5.8	7.3	6.6	8.1


	For the year ended December 31,						ANNUALIZED, based on data for the six months ended June 30,
	2007		2008		2009		2009		2010
	(U.S. dollars)
Average communications services revenue per paying user	$	81	$	102	$	98	$	94	$	96
The table below shows our communications services billing minutes and Skype-to-Skype minutes for each of the periods presented:
	For the year ended December 31,						For the six months ended,
	2007		2008		2009		June 30, 2009		June 30, 2010
	(billions)
Communications services billing minutes		4.1		6.9		10.7		5.0		6.4
Skype-to-Skype minutes		43.4		65.5		113.0		49.1		88.4


	Predecessor		Successor		Pro forma adjustments			Pro forma
	Period from January 1 to November 18, 2009		Period from November 19 to December 31, 2009		Pro forma adjustments			Year ended December 31, 2009
	(thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share information)
Net revenues	$	626,458	$	92,445	$	—		$	718,903
Cost of net revenues		293,533		44,836		31,926	⁽¹⁾		370,295

Gross profit		332,925		47,609		(31,926	)		348,608

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		111,029		17,267		(2,200


Goldman, Sachs & Co.		J.P. Morgan		Morgan Stanley


Allen & Company LLC		Evercore Partners