XML 19 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
Guaranty Obligation and Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2016
GUARANTY OBLIGATION AND ALLOWANCE FOR RISK-SHARING OBLIGATIONS  
Guaranty Obligation and Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations

NOTE 5—GUARANTY OBLIGATION AND ALLOWANCE FOR RISK-SHARING OBLIGATIONS

When a loan is sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program, the Company typically agrees to guarantee a portion of the ultimate loss incurred on the loan should the borrower fail to perform. The compensation for this risk is a component of the servicing fee on the loan. No guaranty is provided for loans sold under the Freddie Mac or HUD loan programs or under the Company’s CMBS Program.

Activity related to the guaranty obligation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30, 

 

June 30, 

 

(in thousands)

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

 

Beginning balance

 

$

28,552

 

$

25,333

 

$

27,570

 

$

24,975

 

Additions, following the sale of loan

 

 

1,777

 

 

3,115

 

 

3,689

 

 

4,870

 

Amortization

 

 

(1,537)

 

 

(1,308)

 

 

(2,750)

 

 

(2,705)

 

Other

 

 

(386)

 

 

 —

 

 

(103)

 

 

 —

 

Ending balance

 

$

28,406

 

$

27,140

 

$

28,406

 

$

27,140

 

The Company evaluates the allowance for risk-sharing obligations by monitoring the performance of each loan for triggering events or conditions that may signal a potential default. In situations where payment under the guaranty is probable and estimable on a specific loan, the Company records an allowance for the estimated risk-sharing loss through a charge to the provision for risk-sharing obligations, which is a component of Provision (benefit) for credit losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, along with a write-off of the loan-specific MSR and guaranty obligation. The amount of the provision reflects our assessment of the likelihood of payment by the borrower, the estimated disposition value of the underlying collateral, and the level of risk sharing. Historically, the loss recognition occurs at or before the loan becomes 60 days delinquent.  Activity related to the allowance for risk-sharing obligations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30, 

 

June 30, 

 

(in thousands)

    

2016

    

2015

    

2016

    

2015

 

Beginning balance

 

$

5,149

 

$

4,054

 

$

5,586

 

$

3,904

 

Provision for risk-sharing obligations

 

 

275

 

 

58

 

 

121

 

 

208

 

Write-offs

 

 

 —

 

 

(808)

 

 

 —

 

 

(808)

 

Other

 

 

386

 

 

 —

 

 

103

 

 

 —

 

Ending balance

 

$

5,810

 

$

3,304

 

$

5,810

 

$

3,304

 

When the Company places a loan for which it has a risk-sharing obligation on its watch list, the Company ceases to amortize the guaranty obligation and transfers the remaining unamortized balance of the guaranty obligation to the allowance for risk-sharing obligations. When a loan for which the Company has a risk-sharing obligation is removed from the watch list, the loan is transferred from the allowance for risk-sharing obligations to the guaranty obligation, and the amortization of the remaining balance over the remaining estimated life is resumed. This net transfer of the unamortized balance of the guaranty obligation from a noncontingent classification to a contingent classification (and vice versa) is presented in the guaranty obligation and allowance for risk-sharing obligations tables above as ‘Other.’

As of June 30, 2016, the maximum quantifiable contingent liability associated with the Company’s guarantees under the Fannie Mae DUS agreement was $4.3 billion. The maximum quantifiable contingent liability is not representative of the actual loss the Company would incur. The Company would be liable for this amount only if all of the loans it services for Fannie Mae, for which the Company retains some risk of loss, were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans was determined to be without value at the time of settlement.