XML 24 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.5.0.2
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2016
Real Estate Investments, Net [Abstract]  
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT
The Company’s real estate properties held for investment consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
As of September 30, 2016
Property Type
 
Number of
Properties
 
Number of
Beds/Units
 
Total
Real Estate
at Cost
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total
Real Estate
Investments, Net
Skilled Nursing/Transitional Care
 
102

 
11,503

 
$
1,083,054

 
$
(194,853
)
 
$
888,201

Senior Housing
 
79

 
7,059

 
1,127,631

 
(67,924
)
 
1,059,707

Acute Care Hospital
 
1

 
70

 
61,640

 
(9,926
)
 
51,714

 
 
182

 
18,632

 
2,272,325

 
(272,703
)
 
1,999,622

Corporate Level
 
 
 
 
 
406

 
(250
)
 
156

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,272,731

 
$
(272,953
)
 
$
1,999,778

As of December 31, 2015
Property Type
 
Number of
Properties
 
Number of
Beds/Units
 
Total
Real Estate
at Cost
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total
Real Estate
Investments, Net
Skilled Nursing/Transitional Care
 
103

 
11,515

 
$
1,051,189

 
$
(174,662
)
 
$
876,527

Senior Housing
 
75

 
6,710

 
1,050,162

 
(45,800
)
 
1,004,362

Acute Care Hospitals
 
2

 
124

 
175,807

 
(17,127
)
 
158,680

 
 
180

 
18,349

 
2,277,158

 
(237,589
)
 
2,039,569

Corporate Level
 
 
 
 
 
299

 
(252
)
 
47

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
2,277,457

 
$
(237,841
)
 
$
2,039,616


 
September 30, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Building and improvements
$
1,962,520

 
$
1,954,129

Furniture and equipment
85,423

 
97,840

Land improvements
3,888

 
3,594

Land
220,900

 
221,894

 
2,272,731

 
2,277,457

Accumulated depreciation
(272,953
)
 
(237,841
)
 
$
1,999,778

 
$
2,039,616


Contingent Consideration Arrangements
In connection with four of its real estate acquisitions, the Company entered into contingent consideration arrangements. Under the contingent consideration arrangements, the Company may pay out additional amounts based on incremental value created through the improvement of operations of the acquired facility (a contingent consideration liability) or may be entitled to receive a portion of the original purchase price of the acquired facility if the facility does not meet certain performance hurdles (a contingent consideration asset). The estimated value of the contingent consideration liabilities at the time of purchase was $3.2 million. The estimated value of the contingent consideration asset at the time of purchase was $0. The contingent consideration amounts would be determined based on portfolio performance and the tenant achieving certain performance hurdles during 2016 through 2018. To determine the value of the contingent consideration, the Company used significant inputs not observable in the market to estimate the contingent consideration, made assumptions regarding the probability of the portfolio achieving the incremental value and then applied an appropriate discount rate. As of September 30, 2016, based on the potential future performance of these facilities, the contingent consideration liabilities had an estimated value of $2.4 million, which amount is included in accounts payable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, and the contingent consideration asset had an estimated value of $0. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded an adjustment to increase the contingent consideration arrangements by $0.1 million and included this amount in other income (expense) on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.
Operating Leases
As of September 30, 2016, all of the Company’s real estate properties were leased under triple-net operating leases with expirations ranging from one to 16 years. As of September 30, 2016, the leases had a weighted-average remaining term of 9 years. The leases include provisions to extend the lease terms and other negotiated terms and conditions. The Company, through its subsidiaries, retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to the tenants. In addition, the Company may receive additional security under these operating leases in the form of letters of credit and security deposits from the lessee or guarantees from the parent of the lessee. Security deposits received in cash related to tenant leases are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and totaled $2.1 million as of September 30, 2016 and $1.3 million as of December 31, 2015. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had a $3.2 million reserve for unpaid cash rents and a $1.4 million reserve associated with accumulated straight-line rental income. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a $3.5 million reserve for unpaid cash rents and a $5.3 million reserve associated with accumulated straight-line rental income. As of September 30, 2016, the Company's three largest tenants, Genesis, Holiday and NMS Healthcare, represented 32.6%, 16.3% and 12.4%, respectively, of the Company's annualized revenues. Other than these three tenants, none of the Company’s tenants individually represented 10% or more of the Company’s annualized revenues as of September 30, 2016.
The Company has entered into memoranda of understanding with Genesis to jointly market for sale 35 skilled nursing facilities and make certain other lease and corporate guarantee amendments for the remaining 43 facilities leased to Genesis. Marketing of these 35 facilities is ongoing and is expected to be completed over the next several quarters.
The Company monitors the creditworthiness of its tenants by reviewing credit ratings (if available) and evaluating the ability of the tenants to meet their lease obligations to the Company based on the tenants’ financial performance, including the evaluation of any parent guarantees (or the guarantees of other related parties) of tenant lease obligations. Because formal credit ratings may not be available for most of the Company’s tenants, the primary basis for the Company’s evaluation of the credit quality of its tenants (and more specifically the tenants’ ability to pay their rent obligations to the Company) is the tenants’ lease coverage ratios. These coverage ratios include earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (“EBITDAR”) to rent and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees (“EBITDARM”) to rent at the lease level and consolidated EBITDAR to total fixed charges at the parent guarantor level when such a guarantee exists. The Company obtains various financial and operational information from its tenants each month and reviews this information in conjunction with the above-described coverage metrics to identify financial and operational trends, evaluate the impact of the industry's operational and financial environment (including the impact of government reimbursement), and evaluate the management of the tenant’s operations. These metrics help the Company identify potential areas of concern relative to its tenants’ credit quality and ultimately the tenants’ ability to generate sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations, including its obligation to continue to pay the rent due to the Company.
As of September 30, 2016, the future minimum rental payments from the Company’s properties held for investment under non-cancelable operating leases was as follows (in thousands):
October 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016
$
52,272

2017
212,373

2018
217,914

2019
224,207

2020
230,351

Thereafter
1,306,497

 
$
2,243,614