FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using a combination of market quotes, pricing models and other valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments.

Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and whose markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments whose markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and the Credit Facility are reasonable estimates of fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. Fair values for other financial instruments are derived as follows:

Loans receivable: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their amortized cost and not at fair value. The fair value of the loans receivable were estimated using an internal valuation model that considered the expected cash flows for the loans receivable, the underlying collateral value and other credit enhancements. As such, the Company classifies these instruments as Level 3 inputs.

Preferred equity investments: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their cost and not at fair value. The fair value of the preferred equity investments were estimated using an internal valuation model that considered the expected future cash flows for the preferred equity investment, the underlying collateral value and other credit enhancements. As such, the Company classifies these instruments as Level 3 inputs.

Derivative instruments: The Company’s derivative instruments are presented at fair value on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company estimates the fair value of derivative instruments, including its interest rate cap, interest rate swap and cross currency swaps, using the assistance of a third party using inputs that are observable in the market, which includes forward yield curves and other relevant information. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivative financial instruments fall within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivative financial instruments utilize level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. The Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivative financial instruments. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative financial instruments valuations in their entirety are classified in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Senior Notes: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their outstanding principal balance, net of unamortized deferred financing costs and premiums (discounts) and not at fair value. The fair values of the Senior Notes were determined using third-party market quotes derived from orderly trades. As such, the Company classifies these instruments as Level 2 inputs.

Mortgage indebtedness: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their outstanding principal balance, net of unamortized deferred financing costs and premiums (discounts) and not at fair value. The fair values of the Company’s mortgage notes payable were estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. As such, the Company classifies these instruments as Level 3 inputs.

The following are the face values, carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 whose carrying amounts do not approximate their fair value (in thousands):



	March 31, 2016						December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount ⁽¹⁾		Face Value ⁽²⁾		Fair Value		Carrying Amount ⁽¹⁾		Face Value ⁽²⁾		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Loans receivable	$	272,250	$	271,815	$	279,112	$	270,184	$	273,811	$	274,628
Preferred equity investments	31,958		31,608		33,719		29,993		29,643		30,838
Financial liabilities:
Senior Notes	686,336		700,000		697,250		685,704		700,000		718,500
Mortgage indebtedness	175,045		178,017		169,579		174,846		177,850		165,296

⁽¹⁾Carrying amounts represent the book value of financial instruments and are net of unamortized premiums (discounts) and deferred financing costs.

⁽²⁾ Face value represents amounts contractually due under the terms of the respective agreements.

The Company determined the fair value of financial instruments as of March 31, 2016 whose carrying amounts do not approximate their fair value with valuation methods utilizing the following types of inputs (in thousands):



			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Financial assets:
Loans receivable	$	279,112	$	—	$	—	$	279,112
Preferred equity investments	33,719		—		—		33,719
Financial liabilities:
Senior Notes	697,250		—		697,250		—
Mortgage indebtedness	169,579		—		—		169,579

Disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company at the applicable dates and requires a significant amount of judgment. Despite increased capital market and credit market activity, transaction volume for certain financial instruments remains relatively low. This has made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of fair value at a future date could be materially different.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded the following amounts measured at fair value (in thousands):



			Fair Value Measurements Using
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Recurring Basis:
Financial assets:
Interest rate cap	$	670	$	—	$	670	$	—
Cross currency swap	2,838		—		2,838		—
Contingent consideration asset	350		—		—		350
Financial liabilities:
Contingent consideration liability	2,700		—		—		2,700
Interest rate swap	1,989		—		1,989		—

The Company entered into contingent consideration arrangements as a result of four acquisitions of real estate (see Note 3, “Real Estate Properties Held for Investment”). In order to determine the fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration arrangements, the Company used significant inputs not observable in the market to estimate the contingent consideration. In addition to using an appropriate discount rate, the Company used projections provided by the facilities to estimate future earnings at the facilities, then developed probability-weighted scenarios of the potential future performance of the tenant and the resulting payout from these scenarios. As of each of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the total contingent consideration liability was valued at $2.7 million and the contingent consideration asset was valued at $0.4 million.