XML 63 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using a combination of market quotes, pricing models and other valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments.
Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and whose markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments whose markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, the Revolving Credit Facility and term loan are reasonable estimates of fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. Fair values for other financial instruments are derived as follows:
Loans receivable: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their amortized cost and not at fair value. The fair value of the loans receivable were estimated using an internal valuation model that considered the expected cash flows for the loans receivable, the underlying collateral value and other credit enhancements.
Preferred equity investments: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their cost and not at fair value. The fair value of the preferred equity investments were estimated using an internal valuation model that considered the expected future cash flows for the preferred equity investment, the underlying collateral value and other credit enhancements.
Derivative instruments: The Company’s derivative instruments are presented at fair value on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company estimates the fair value of derivative instruments, including the interest rate cap, using the assistance of a third party using inputs that are observable in the market, which includes forward yield curves and other relevant information. As such, the Company classifies these inputs as Level 2 inputs.
Senior Notes: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their cost and not at fair value. The fair values of the Senior Notes were determined using third-party market quotes derived from orderly trades.
Mortgage indebtedness: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their cost and not at fair value. The fair values of the Company’s mortgage notes payable were estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements.
The following are the face values, carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 whose carrying amounts do not approximate their fair value (in thousands):
 
March 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Face
Value (1)
 
Carrying
Amount (2)
 
Fair
Value
 
Face
Value (1)
 
Carrying
Amount
(2)
 
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans receivable
$
240,363

 
$
241,132

 
$
241,860

 
$
234,359

 
$
235,176

 
$
234,227

Preferred equity investments
16,919

 
17,214

 
17,638

 
16,125

 
16,407

 
17,115

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Notes
700,000

 
699,298

 
744,500

 
700,000

 
699,272

 
723,625

Mortgage indebtedness
123,325

 
123,325

 
118,471

 
124,022

 
124,022

 
122,131

 
(1) Face value represents amounts contractually due under the terms of the respective agreements.
(2) Carrying amounts represent the book value of financial instruments and include unamortized premiums (discounts).
The Company determined the fair value of financial instruments as of March 31, 2015 whose carrying amounts do not approximate their fair value with valuation methods utilizing the following types of inputs (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans receivable
$
241,860

 
$

 
$

 
$
241,860

Preferred equity investments
17,638

 

 

 
17,638

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Notes
744,500

 

 
744,500

 

Mortgage indebtedness
118,471

 

 

 
118,471


Disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company at the applicable dates and requires a significant amount of judgment. Despite increased capital market and credit market activity, transaction volume for certain financial instruments remains relatively low. This has made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of fair value at a future date could be materially different.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recorded the following amounts measured at fair value (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Recurring Basis:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate cap
$
3,073

 
$

 
$
3,073

 
$

Contingent consideration liability
4,000

 

 

 
4,000


The Company’s contingent consideration liability is the result of two acquisitions of real estate (see Note 3, “Real Estate Properties Held for Investment”). In order to determine the fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration liability, the Company used significant inputs not observable in the market to estimate the liability. In addition to using an appropriate discount rate, the Company used projections provided by the facilities to estimate future earnings at the facilities, then developed probability-weighted scenarios of the potential future performance of the tenant and the resulting payout from these scenarios.  As of March 31, 2015, the total contingent consideration liability was valued at $4.0 million. The following reconciliation provides the details of activity during the three months ended March 31, 2015 for contingent consideration liability recorded at fair value using Level 3 inputs:

Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
$
3,900

Increase in contingent liability
 
100

Balance as of March 31, 2015
 
$
4,000

 
 
 

A corresponding amount equal to the increase in contingent liability was included as other expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2015.