XML 62 R17.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures
FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

The fair value for certain financial instruments is derived using a combination of market quotes, pricing models and other valuation techniques that involve significant management judgment. The price transparency of financial instruments is a key determinant of the degree of judgment involved in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments.
Financial instruments for which actively quoted prices or pricing parameters are available and whose markets contain orderly transactions will generally have a higher degree of price transparency than financial instruments whose markets are inactive or consist of non-orderly trades. The Company evaluates several factors when determining if a market is inactive or when market transactions are not orderly. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are reasonable estimates of fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. Fair values for other financial instruments are derived as follows:
Loans receivable: These instruments are presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at their amortized cost and not at fair value. The fair value of the loans receivable were estimated using an internal valuation model that considered the expected cash flows for the loans receivable, the underlying collateral value and other credit enhancements.
Senior Notes: The fair values of the Senior Notes were determined using third-party market quotes derived from orderly trades.
Mortgage indebtedness: The fair values of the Company’s notes payable were estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on management’s estimates of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements.
The following are the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 whose carrying amounts do not approximate their fair value (in thousands):
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
 
Face
Value (1)
 
Carrying
Amount (2)
 
Fair
Value
 
Face
Value (1)
 
Carrying
Amount
(2)
 
Fair
Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans receivable
$
11,965

 
$
12,017

 
$
12,826

 
$

 
$

 
$

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Notes
325,000

 
330,666

 
345,313

 
225,000

 
225,000

 
227,813

Mortgage indebtedness
152,322

 
152,322

 
152,559

 
153,442

 
153,942

 
167,413

Secured Revolving Credit Facility
92,500

 
92,500

 
92,500

 

 

 

 
(1) Face value represents amounts contractually due under the terms of the respective agreements.
(2) Carrying amounts represent the book value of financial instruments and include unamortized premiums (discounts).
The Company determined the fair value of financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 whose carrying amounts do not approximate their fair value with valuation methods utilizing the following types of inputs (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loan receivable
$
12,826

 
$

 
$

 
$
12,826

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Notes
345,313

 

 
345,313

 

Mortgage indebtedness
152,559

 

 

 
152,559

Secured Revolving Credit Facility
92,500

 

 

 
92,500

Disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to the Company at the applicable dates and requires a significant amount of judgment. Despite increased capital market and credit market activity, transaction volume for certain financial instruments remains relatively low. This has made the estimation of fair values difficult and, therefore, both the actual results and the Company’s estimate of fair value at a future date could be materially different.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company recorded the following amounts measured at fair value (in thousands):
 
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
 
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs
 
Total
 
(Level 1)
 
(Level 2)
 
(Level 3)
Recurring Basis:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contingent consideration
$
1,300

 

 

 
1,300

Nonrecurring Basis:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate held for sale
2,208

 
$

 
$
2,208

 
$

The fair value of the Company’s real estate held for sale, which is measured on a nonrecurring basis, is based on the contracted sales price and has been determined to be Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.