XML 66 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Real Estate Investments, Net [Abstract]  
Real Estate Investments
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES HELD FOR INVESTMENT

The Company’s real estate properties held for investment consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
As of December 31, 2012  
Property Type
 
Number of
Properties
 
Number of
Beds/Units
 
Total
Real Estate
at Cost
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total
Real Estate
Investments, Net
Skilled Nursing/Post-Acute
 
96

 
10,826

 
$
746,510

 
$
(116,426
)
 
$
630,084

Senior Housing
 
22

 
1,486

 
148,210

 
(9,949
)
 
138,261

Acute Care Hospital
 
1

 
70

 
61,640

 
(3,001
)
 
58,639

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
119

 
12,382

 
956,360

 
(129,376
)
 
826,984

Corporate Level
 
 
 
 
 
254

 
(103
)
 
151

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
956,614

 
$
(129,479
)
 
$
827,135

As of December 31, 2011
Property Type
 
Number of
Properties
 
Number of
Beds/Units
 
Total
Real Estate
at Cost
 
Accumulated
Depreciation
 
Total
Real Estate
Investments, Net
Skilled Nursing/Post-Acute
 
86

 
9,858

 
$
651,637

 
$
(97,985
)
 
$
553,652

Senior Housing
 
9

 
773

 
47,192

 
(8,140
)
 
39,052

Acute Care Hospital
 
1

 
70

 
61,640

 
(1,154
)
 
60,486

 
 
96

 
10,701

 
760,469

 
(107,279
)
 
653,190

Corporate Level
 
 
 
 
 
239

 
(52
)
 
187

 
 
 
 
 
 
$
760,708

 
$
(107,331
)
 
$
653,377

 
 
December 31, 2012
 
December 31, 2011
Building and improvements
$
782,221

 
$
622,222

Furniture and equipment
43,810

 
43,131

Land improvements
4,535

 
4,635

Land
126,048

 
90,720

 
956,614

 
760,708

Accumulated depreciation
(129,479
)
 
(107,331
)
 
$
827,135

 
$
653,377


Operating Leases
As of December 31, 2012, all of the Company’s real estate properties were leased under triple-net operating leases with expirations ranging from eight to 22 years. As of December 31, 2012, the leases had a weighted-average remaining term of 11 years. The leases include provisions to extend the lease terms and other negotiated terms and conditions. The Company, through its subsidiaries, retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to the tenants. In addition, the Company may receive additional security under these operating leases in the form of security deposits from the lessee or guarantees from the parent of the lessee. Security deposits received in cash related to tenant leases are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and totaled $1.1 million and $0.7 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, 85 of the Company’s 119 real estate properties held for investment and its one asset held for sale were leased to subsidiaries of Genesis.

The Company monitors the creditworthiness of its tenants by reviewing credit ratings (if available) and evaluating the ability of the tenants to meet their lease obligations to the Company based on the tenants’ financial performance, including the evaluation of any parent guarantees of tenant lease obligations. Because formal credit ratings may not be available for most of the Company’s tenants, the primary basis for the Company’s evaluation of the credit quality of its tenants (and more specifically the tenants’ ability to pay their rent obligations to the Company) is the tenants’ lease coverage ratios. These coverage ratios include earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (“EBITDAR”) to rent coverage and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees (“EBITDARM”) to rent coverage at the facility level and consolidated EBITDAR to total rent coverage at the parent guarantor level when such a guarantee exists (currently the Genesis lease portfolio). The Company obtains various financial and operational information from its tenants each month and reviews this information in conjunction with the above-described coverage metrics to determine trends and the operational and financial impact of the environment in the industry (including the impact of government reimbursement) and the management of the tenant’s operations. These metrics help the Company identify potential areas of concern relative to its tenants’ credit quality and ultimately the tenants’ ability to generate sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations, including its obligation to continue to pay the rent due to the Company.
As of December 31, 2012, the future minimum rental income from the Company’s properties under non-cancelable operating leases was as follows (in thousands):
 
 
2013
$
125,943

2014
125,943

2015
125,943

2016
125,943

2017
125,943

Thereafter
751,896

 
 
 
$
1,381,611