XML 69 R36.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Investment in Unconsolidated Entities (Tables)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]  
Schedule of Unconsolidated Investments and Debt [Table Text Block]
 The Company is the guarantor of the construction and mortgage debt or credit facilities of its joint ventures with HSRE and Beaumont. See Note 17. Details of the Company’s unconsolidated investments at December 31, 2014 are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number of
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Average
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our
 
Year
 
Properties In
 
Total
 
Total  (5)
 
Net Total
 
Amount
 
Interest
 
 
 
 
Unconsolidated Entities
 
Ownership
 
Founded
 
Operation
 
Investment
 
Impairment
 
Investment
 
Outstanding
 
Rate
 
Maturity Date / Range
 
HSRE-Campus Crest I, LLC
 
 
63.9
%
 
2009
 
 
3
 
$
10,380
 
$
(10,168)
 
$
212
 
$
32,485
 
 
2.67
%(1)
 
5/9/2015
 
HSRE-Campus Crest V, LLC
 
 
10.0
%
 
2011
 
 
3
 
 
4,093
 
 
(4,093)
 
 
-
 
 
49,614
 
 
2.89
%(1)
 
4/20/2015-5/05/2015
 
HSRE-Campus Crest VI, LLC
 
 
20.0
%
 
2012
 
 
3
 
 
15,089
 
 
(8,274)
 
 
6,815
 
 
53,706
 
 
2.48
%(1)
 
5/08/2015 – 12/19/2015
 
HSRE-Campus Crest IX, LLC
 
 
30.0
%
 
2013
 
 
1
 
 
18,975
 
 
-
 
 
18,975
 
 
90,204
 
 
2.37
%(1)
 
7/25/2016
 
HSRE-Campus Crest X, LLC
 
 
30.0
%
 
2013
 
 
2
 
 
12,307
 
 
(4,234)
 
 
8,073
 
 
40,739
 
 
2.36
%(1)
 
9/06/2016-9/30/2018
 
CB Portfolio
 
 
48.0
%(3)
 
2013
 
 
35
 
 
218,718
 
 
-
 
 
218,718
 
 
227,698
 
 
5.14
%(2)
 
9/01/2015 – 10/01/2020
 
CSH Montreal
 
 
47.0
%(4)
 
2013
 
 
2
 
 
33,470
 
 
(26,523)
 
 
6,947
 
 
87,970
 
 
6.39
%(1)
 
1/13/2016
 
Total unconsolidated entities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
49
 
$
313,032
 
$
(53,292)
 
$
259,740
 
$
582,416
 
 
4.13
%
 
 
 
 
(1)
Variable interest rates.
 
(2)
Comprised of fixed rate debt.
 
(3)
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had a 48.0% ownership interest in the CB Portfolio.
 
(4)
As of January 2014, the Company’s ownership increased to 20.0% from 47.0% due to the acquisition of Holiday Inn Midtown in Montreal, Quebec. See discussion above.
 
(5)
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized an impairment of unconsolidated entities of $57.8 million, of which $53.3 million reduced the carrying value of the investments and $4.5 million was recorded as a guarantee obligation in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Equity Method Investment Summarized Financial Information Combined Financial Information [Table Text Block]
The following is a summary of the combined financial position of the Company’s unconsolidated entities with HSRE and Beaumont in their entirety, not only its interest in the entities, for the periods presented (in thousands):
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Student housing properties, net
 
$
437,108
 
$
289,797
 
Development in process
 
 
7,429
 
 
81,994
 
Other assets
 
 
12,947
 
 
15,341
 
Total assets
 
$
457,484
 
$
387,132
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage and construction loans
 
$
354,759
 
$
165,445
 
Other liabilities
 
 
29,364
 
 
58,948
 
Owners' equity
 
 
73,361
 
 
162,739
 
Total liabilities and owners' equity
 
$
457,484
 
$
387,132
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company's share of historical owners' equity
 
$
30,481
 
$
41,390
 
Preferred investment(1)
 
 
7,322
 
 
16,468
 
Net difference in carrying value of investment versus net book value of underlying net assets(2)
 
 
3,219
 
 
5,568
 
Carrying value of investment in HSRE and other non-Copper Beech entities
 
$
41,022
 
$
63,426
 
 
(1)
As of December 31, 2014, the Company had Class B membership interests in The Grove at Indiana, Pennsylvania, The Grove at Greensboro, North Carolina, and The Grove at Louisville, Kentucky, of approximately $2.7 million, $2.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, entitling the Company to a 9.0% return on its investment upon the respective property being operational. The Company also had, from January to September 2, 2014, a CAD 16 million ($13.8 million at December 31, 2014 exchange rate) Class A interest in CSH Holdings entitling it to a commitment fee of 1.0% of the Class A interest each quarter and a 10.0% annual return on its investment.
 
(2)
This amount represents the aggregate difference between the Company’s carrying amount and its underlying equity in the net assets of its investments, which is typically amortized over the life of the related asset. The basis differential occurs primarily due to the other than temporary impairments recorded during 2014 (see Note 4), the difference between the allocated value to acquired entity interests and the venture’s basis in those interests, the capitalization of additional investment in the unconsolidated entity, and the elimination of service related revenue to the extent of the Company’s percentage ownership.
Equity Method Investment Summarized Financial Information Statement Of Operation [Table Text Block]
The following is a summary of the operating results for the Company’s unconsolidated Copper Beech entities in their entirety, not only its interest in the entities. For the year ended December 31, 2014, this summary includes results for 28 properties from January 1, 2014 through August 18, 2014 and results for 35 unconsolidated properties from August 19, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (in thousands):
 
 
 
 
 
Period from
 
 
 
Year Ended
 
March 18, 2013 to
 
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
 
$
83,108
 
$
67,545
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
34,525
 
 
28,316
 
Interest expense
 
 
13,152
 
 
11,852
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
 
35,827
 
 
56,106
 
Total expenses
 
 
83,504
 
 
96,274
 
Net loss
 
$
(396)
 
$
(28,729)
 
Schedule of Equity in Losses in the CB Portfolio [Table Text Block]
The following table is the calculation of the Company’s equity in losses in the CB Portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2014 and for the period from March 18, 2013 to December 31, 2013. As there are several components of the calculation, set forth below are notes corresponding to the notes included in the Company’s calculation to further explain these components (in thousands).
 
 
 
Year Ended
 
Period from
 
 
 
December 31,
 
March 18, 2013 to
 
 
 
2014
 
December 31, 2013
 
Net loss incurred by the CB Portfolio based on the Company's purchase price (1)
 
$
(396)
 
$
(28,729)
 
Campus Crest's share of net loss (2)
 
 
(606)
 
 
(9,215)
 
Campus Crest percentage of preferred payment (3)
 
 
911
 
 
5,663
 
Campus Crest earnings from Copper Beech
 
 
305
 
 
(3,552)
 
Amortization of basis difference (4)
 
 
(557)
 
 
(264)
 
Total equity in earnings (loss) in the CB Portfolio
 
$
(252)
 
$
(3,816)
 
 
(1)
The basis of the financial statements of the CB Portfolio used in the calculation of the Company’s equity in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2014 was computed using the cost basis for its investment in the CB Portfolio’s underlying assets and liabilities for its properties at the dates the Company acquired its interests in the CB Portfolio. The calculation includes the effects of purchase price adjustments determined at the date the Company acquired its interests in the CB Portfolio.
 
The Company consummated the acquisition of a 48.0% interest in 36 properties of the CB Portfolio. As a result of lender consents that were required to be obtained from various lenders to the CB Portfolio prior to its ownership, the Company completed its acquisition of the 48.0% interest in stages, which resulted in a variation in its ownership percentage from 25.3% to 48.0% in all 36 of the CB Portfolio operating properties from March 18, 2013 to September 30, 2013. Effective October 1, 2013, the Company and the CB Portfolio sellers amended the purchase and sale agreement, subject to receipt of all required third party consents, to increase the Company’s ownership interest by 19.0% in 28 of the 35 properties (thereby increasing its ownership in the 28 properties to 67%) in exchange for the Company’s 48.0% interest in seven of the properties (thereby reducing its ownership in the seven properties to 0%) and deferring the Company’s acquisition of any interests in two of the properties, plus a $20.2 million cash payment. Accordingly, the Company recognized its proportionate share of earnings of the CB Portfolio for the specific percentage of ownership interest it held during the applicable period, which was a 67.0% effective interest in the 28 properties during the first and second quarters of 2014 and through August 18, 2014. Due to the Company's decision not to exercise the first purchase option to acquire additional interests in the CB Portfolio, on August 19, 2014, the Company's ownership interest in all 35 unconsolidated operating properties in the CB Portfolio reverted to 48.0% and remained at 48.0% through December 31, 2014.
 
(2)
For the year ended December 31, 2014, the losses incurred from January 1, 2014 through August 18, 2014 while the Company held 67% ownership in 28 of the properties exceeded the income earned from August 19, 2014 through December 31, 2014 while the Company held 48% ownership in 36 properties.
 
(3)
The Company was entitled to a preferred payment for the first year of its investment and the proportionate share of the remaining operating cash flows in the CB Portfolio and it was currently entitled to its proportionate share of the operating cash flows in the CB Portfolio. During the period from March 18, 2013 to March 17, 2014, the Company was entitled to $13.0 million related to its preferred payment, all of which has been paid, and the Company received approximately $1.0 million in other distributions, as of December 31, 2014.
 
(4)
The Company recorded in the calculation of equity in losses in the CB Portfolio the amortization of the net difference in the Company’s carrying value of investment as compared to the underlying equity in net assets of the investee.
HSRE and DCV Holdings [Member]  
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]  
Equity Method Investment Summarized Financial Information Combined Financial Information [Table Text Block]
The following is a summary of the combined operating results for the Company’s unconsolidated entities with HSRE and Beaumont in their entirety, not only its interest in the entities, for the periods presented (in thousands):
 
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
2012
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
 
$
30,811
 
$
23,422
 
$
17,934
 
Expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating expenses
 
 
21,846
 
 
17,434
 
 
9,665
 
Interest expense
 
 
7,577
 
 
5,025
 
 
4,962
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
 
11,091
 
 
6,304
 
 
4,807
 
Total expenses
 
 
40,514
 
 
28,763
 
 
19,434
 
Net loss
 
$
(9,703)
 
$
(5,341)
 
$
(1,500)
 
Copper Beech [Member]  
Schedule of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]  
Equity Method Investment Summarized Financial Information Statement Of Operation [Table Text Block]
The following is a summary of the financial position reflecting the cost basis of the Company’s investments in the Copper Beech entities in their entirety for the 35 and 28 unconsolidated properties in the CB Portfolio as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively (in thousands):
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2014
 
2013
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Student housing properties, net
 
$
906,614
 
$
748,280
 
Intangible assets
 
 
7,212
 
 
37,100
 
Other assets
 
 
14,293
 
 
5,201
 
Total assets
 
$
928,119
 
$
790,581
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and Equity
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage and construction loans
 
$
476,985
 
$
421,239
 
Other liabilities
 
 
15,541
 
 
13,112
 
Owners' equity
 
 
435,593
 
 
356,230
 
Total liabilities and owners' equity
 
$
928,119
 
$
790,581
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Company's share of historical owners' equity
 
$
199,281
 
$
244,964
 
Net difference in carrying value of investment versus net book value of underlying net assets(1)
 
 
19,437
 
 
16,628
 
Carrying value of investment in unconsolidated entity
 
$
218,718
 
$
261,592
 
 
(1)
This amount represents the aggregate difference between the historical cost basis and the basis reflected at the entity level, which is typically amortized over the life of the related asset. The basis differential occurs primarily due to the impairment recognized in connection with not exercising the Copper Beech purchase option offset by the capitalization of transaction costs incurred to acquire the Company's interests in the Copper Beech entities.