XML 66 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
Fair Value of Financial Instruments  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

15. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The following method and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate the fair value.

        Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable—The carrying amount approximates fair value. The valuation is based on settlements of similar financial instruments all of which are short-term in nature and generally settled at or near cost. Cash is measured at Level 1.

        Investment securities—The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices. Investment securities are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

        Debt—The fair value of debt is based on the value at which debt is trading among holders.

        The estimated fair value of financial instruments is as follows (dollars in thousands):

                                                                                                                                                                                    

 

 

Carrying
Value

 

Fair
Value

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets—investment in U.S. Treasury obligations

 

$

808 

 

$

808 

 

Liabilities—long-term debt (carried at amortized cost)

 

 

292,423 

 

 

296,908 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 


 

 

 


 

 

Assets—investment in U.S. Treasury obligations

 

$

807 

 

$

807 

 

Liabilities—long-term debt (carried at amortized cost)

 

 

294,679 

 

 

299,886 

 

Fair Value Measurements

        Fair value for accounting purposes is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price).

        Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement). Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis represent investment securities included in other assets. Liabilities carried at amortized cost with fair value disclosure on a recurring basis represent long-term debt. A summary is as follows (dollars in thousands):

                                                                                                                                                                                    

 

 

December 31,
2014

 

December 31,
2013

 

Asset value measurements using:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

 

$

808 

 

$

807 

 

Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)

 

 

—

 

 

—

 

Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

 

 

—

 

 

—  

 

​

​

​  

​  

​

​  

​  

​

 

 

$

808 

 

$

807 

 

​

​

​  

​  

​

​  

​  

​

​

​

​  

​  

​

​  

​  

​  

Liability value measurements using:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)

 

$

—

 

$

—

 

Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)

 

 

296,908 

 

 

299,886 

 

Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)

 

 

—

 

 

—  

 

​

​

​  

​  

​

​  

​  

​

 

 

$

296,908 

 

$

299,886 

 

​

​

​  

​  

​

​  

​  

​

​

​

​  

​  

​

​  

​  

​  

        Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 represent those recognized in conjunction with the acquisition of SystemMetrics and Wavecom, respectively. A summary of the valued assets and liabilities is included in Note 3 including a discussion of the valuation methodology. The majority of assets and liabilities were valued using level 3 unobservable inputs.