10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018

or

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ________.

Commission File No. 001-34786

Oritani Financial Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	30-0628335
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
370 Pascack Road, Township of Washington	07676
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	Zip Code

(201) 664-5400

(Registrant's telephone number)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value	The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

YES  NO 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

YES  NO 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. YES  NO .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES  NO .

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a small reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company"  in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
		Small reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES  NO 

As of August 29, 2018, there were 56,245,065 shares of the Registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and 46,621,646 shares outstanding.

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price on December 31, 2017, as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market, was approximately $666.0 million.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

1. Proxy Statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant (Part III).

Oritani Financial Corp.

2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K

Index

		Page
	Part I
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	26
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	30
Item 2.	Properties	30
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	30
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	30
	Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	30
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	32
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	34
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	51
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplemental Data	51
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	52
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	52
Item 9B.	Other Information	53
	Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	53
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	53
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	53
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	54
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	54
	Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	54
Item 16.	Form 10-K Summary	54
Signatures		107

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward looking statements may be identified by reference to a future period or periods, or by use of forward looking terminology, such as "may," "will," "believe," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "continue," or similar terms or variations on those terms, or the negative of those terms. Forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions, and uncertainties, including, among other things, the following important factors that could affect the actual outcome of future events: general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market or service areas, that are worse than expected; significantly increased competition among depository and other financial institutions; inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or fair value of financial instruments; changes in laws or government regulations affecting financial institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth opportunities; changes in consumer spending, borrowing, and savings habits; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, taxing authorities and the Financial Accounting Standards Board; and changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans.

Oritani Financial Corp. ("the Company") wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company's financial performance and could cause the Company's actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements. The Company does not undertake and specifically declines any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions, which may be made to any forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Oritani Financial Corp.

Oritani Financial Corp. is the stock holding company for Oritani Bank.  It is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in March 2010.  The Company is the successor to Oritani Financial Corp. ("Oritani-Federal"), a federal corporation and former stock holding company of Oritani Bank.  In conjunction with the second step transaction of Oritani Financial Corp., MHC, the former mutual holding company parent of Oritani-Federal, Oritani-Federal ceased to exist and the Company became its successor.  The second step transaction was completed on June 24, 2010 and accounted for as capital raised by entities under common control.  The Company sold a total of 41,363,214 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share in the related stock offering.  Concurrent with the completion of the offering, shares of Oritani-Federal common stock owned by public stockholders were exchanged for 1.50 shares of the Company's common stock.  In lieu of fractional shares, shareholders were paid in cash.  The Company also issued 481,546 shares of common stock for the accelerated vesting of restricted stock awards triggered by the conversion.  As a result of the offering, the exchange, and shares issued due to the accelerated vesting, as of June 30, 2010, the Company had 56,202,485 shares outstanding.  Net proceeds from the offering were $401.8 million.

Oritani Financial Corp. owns 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of Oritani Bank. Oritani Financial Corp. primarily engages in the business of holding the common stock of Oritani Bank as well as two inactive limited liability companies that owned a variety of real estate investments. Oritani Financial Corp.'s executive office is located at 370 Pascack Road, in the Township of Washington, New Jersey 07676, and its telephone number is (201) 664-5400. Oritani Financial Corp. is subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB"). At June 30, 2018, Oritani Financial Corp. had consolidated assets of $4.17 billion, consolidated deposits of $2.92 billion and consolidated stockholders' equity of $559.3 million. Its consolidated net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 was $42.9 million.

Oritani Financial Corp.'s website (www.oritani.com) contains a link to the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission including copies of annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these filings, if any.  These filings are available, free of charge, as soon as practicable after they are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and can be found under the 'Investor Relations' heading.  Oritani-Federal filings can also be found here.  Information on the website should not be considered a part of this report.

Oritani Bank

General

Oritani Bank is a New Jersey-chartered savings bank headquartered in the Township of Washington, New Jersey. Oritani Bank was originally founded in 1911, as a New Jersey building and loan association. Over the years, Oritani Bank has expanded through internal growth as well as through a series of business combinations. Oritani Bank conducts business from its corporate office located at 370 Pascack Road, in the Township of Washington, New Jersey, lending offices in New York City and Cherry Hill, New Jersey. and its 25 branch offices located in the New Jersey counties of Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic. The telephone number at its corporate office is (201) 664-5400. At June 30, 2018, Oritani Bank's assets totaled $4.17 billion and deposits totaled $2.92 billion.

Our principal business consists of attracting retail and commercial bank deposits from the general public in the areas surrounding our corporate office in the Township of Washington, New Jersey and our branch offices located in the New Jersey Counties of Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic, and investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations, in commercial real estate loans, one to four family residential mortgage loans as well as in second mortgage and equity loans, and investment securities. We originate loans primarily for investment and hold such loans in our portfolio. Occasionally, we will also enter into loan participations. Our revenues are derived principally from interest on loans and securities as well as our investments in real estate and real estate joint ventures. We also generate revenues from fees and service charges and other income. Our primary sources of funds are deposits, borrowings and principal and interest payments on loans and securities.

1

Market Area

From our headquarters in the Township of Washington, New Jersey, we operate 26 full service branches, including our corporate office. We operate branches in four counties of New Jersey: Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic.  The majority of our branches (eighteen) including our Corporate office and deposits are located in Bergen County.  In addition, we operate five branches in Hudson County, one branch in Essex County and two branches in Passaic County.  Our residential lending area generally encompasses northern New Jersey.  Our market area for commercial lending, including residential CRE, is broader, generally including the state of New Jersey, eastern Pennsylvania, southern New York, New York City, Long Island, and Delaware.

In terms of population, Bergen County ranks as the largest county in New Jersey (out of 21 counties) while Hudson County ranks fourth, Essex County ranks third and Passaic County ranks eight.  The economy in our primary market area has benefited from being varied and diverse. It is largely urban and suburban with a broad economic base.  As one of the wealthiest states in the nation, New Jersey, with an estimated population of 9.0 million, is considered one of the most attractive banking markets in the United States.  As of June 2018, the unemployment rate for New Jersey was 4.3%, which was higher than the national rate of 4.0%, with a total of 4.5 million New Jersey residents employed as of June 2018.  Bergen County is considered part of the New York metropolitan area.  Its county seat is Hackensack.  Bergen County ranks 45th among the highest-income counties in the United States in 2015 in terms of per-capita income.

Bergen County is bordered by Rockland County, New York to the north, the Hudson River to the east, Hudson County to the south, Passaic County to the west and also a small border with Essex County to the west.

Passaic County is bordered by Orange County, New York to the north, Rockland County, New York to the northeast, Bergen County to the east, Essex County to the south, Morris County to the southwest and Sussex County to the west.

Essex County is bordered by Passaic County to the north, Morris County to the west, Union County to the south, Hudson County to the east and also a small border with Bergen County to the east.

Hudson County's only land border is with Bergen County to the north and west. It is bordered by the Hudson River and Upper New York Bay to the east; Kill van Kull (which connects Newark Bay with Upper New York Bay) to the south and Newark Bay and the Hackensack River or the Passaic River to the west.

Competition

We face intense competition within our market area both in making loans and attracting deposits.  Our market area has a high concentration of financial institutions including large money center and regional banks, community banks and credit unions.  Some of our competitors offer products and services that we currently do not offer, such as trust services and private banking.  As of June 30, 2017, the latest date for which statistics are available, our market share of deposits was approximately 4.8% in Bergen County and less than 1.0% in each of Essex, Hudson, and Passaic Counties.

Our competition for loans and deposits comes principally from locally owned and out-of-state commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking firms, insurance companies, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"), the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") and credit unions. We face additional competition for deposits from short-term money market funds, brokerage firms, mutual funds and insurance companies. Our primary focus is to build and develop profitable customer relationships across all lines of business while maintaining our role as a community bank.

Lending Activities

Our principal lending activity is the origination of residential commercial real estate loans and commercial real estate loans as well as residential real estate mortgage loans and home equity loans.  Our residential commercial real estate portfolio consists primarily of mortgage loans secured by apartment buildings.  Our commercial real estate portfolio consist primarily of mortgage loans secured by retail anchor shopping centers, commercial offices, retail space, warehouses, and mixed-use buildings.  Our residential real estate portfolio consists of one to four family residential real property and home equity loans.  The residential commercial real estate and commercial real estate portfolios represented $3.30 billion, or 92.2%, of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2018.  One to four family residential real estate mortgage loans represented $267.8 million, or 7.5%, of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2018.  At June 30, 2018, construction and land loans totaled $11.0 million, or 0.3%, of our loan portfolio.

2

Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio, by type of loan at the date  indicated.

	June 30,
	2018					2017					2016					2015					2014
	Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent			Amount		Percent
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential	$	267,771		7.5	%	$	253,310		7.0	%	$	223,701		7.1	%	$	186,342		6.7	%	$	158,180		6.2	%
Residential CRE		2,005,315		56.0			1,945,297		54.0			1,596,876		50.3			1,229,816		43.9			998,439		39.3
Grocery/Credit Retail CRE		497,708		13.9			535,567		14.9			457,058		14.4			481,216		17.2			624,705		24.5
Other CRE		796,589		22.3			866,826		24.0			887,443		28.0			894,016		32.0			729,071		28.6
Construction and land loans		10,960		0.3			4,210		0.1			4,810		0.2			6,132		0.2			34,951		1.4
Total loans		3,578,343		100.0	%		3,605,210		100.0	%		3,169,888		100.0	%		2,797,522		100.0	%		2,545,346		100.0	%
Other items:
Net deferred loan origination fees		6,878					8,235					7,980					10,421					10,051
Allowance for loan losses		30,562					30,272					29,951					30,889					31,401
Total loans, net	$	3,540,903				$	3,566,703				$	3,131,957				$	2,756,212				$	2,503,894

Loan Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The following table summarizes the scheduled repayments of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2018. Maturities are based on the final contractual payment date and do not reflect the effect of prepayments and scheduled principal amortization.

	Residential					Residential CRE					Grocery/Credit Retail CRE					Other CRE					Construction and Land Loans					Total
	Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate			Amount		Weighted Average Rate
Due During the Years Ended June 30,	(Dollars in thousands)
2019	$	19,931		4.62	%	$	23,366		3.71	%	$	4,218		5.85	%	$	61,257		4.72	%	$	4,803		5.75	%	$	113,575		4.58	%
2020 to 2021		803		4.79			57,219		4.37			28,586		4.30			75,223		4.67			3,538		5.25			165,369		4.52
2022 to 2023		2,558		4.16			196,304		3.65			59,379		3.99			110,079		4.56			—		—			368,320		3.98
2024  to 2028		6,938		4.05			997,047		3.43			251,100		3.56			318,762		3.99			2,332		5.75			1,576,179		3.57
2029  to 2033		35,773		3.50			626,567		3.58			115,183		4.12			218,545		4.65			—		—			996,068		3.87
2034 and beyond		201,768		3.97			104,812		4.12			39,242		4.25			12,724		5.18			287		5.75			358,833		4.09
Total	$	267,771		3.96	%	$	2,005,315		3.56	%	$	497,708		3.86	%	$	796,590		4.39	%	$	10,960		5.59	%	$	3,578,344		3.82	%

The following table sets forth, at June 30, 2018, the dollar amount of all fixed- and adjustable-rate loans that are contractually due after June 30, 2019.

	Fixed		Adjustable		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	196,589	$	51,251	$	$247,840
Residential CRE		470,998		1,510,951		1,981,949
Grocery/Credit Retail CRE		127,724		365,766		493,490
Other CRE		318,180		417,153		735,333
Construction and land loans		3,538		2,619		6,157
Total loans	$	1,117,029	$	2,347,740	$	3,464,769

3

Loans:

Residential Loans. We originate one to four family residential mortgage loans, substantially all of which are secured by properties located in our primary market area.  At June 30, 2018, $267.8 million, or 7.5% of our loan portfolio, consisted of one to four family residential mortgage loans and home equity loans.  We generally retain for our portfolio substantially all of the loans that we originate.  Residential mortgage loan originations are generally obtained from existing or past customers, through advertising, and through referrals from local builders, real estate brokers, and attorneys, and are underwritten pursuant to Oritani Bank's policies and standards.  The Company maintains a program where a fee is paid to a broker for a loan referral that results in an origination or a purchase of a recently closed loan.  Generally, residential mortgage loans are originated in amounts up to 80% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of the property, with private mortgage insurance required on loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80%.  We generally will not make loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 90%.  Fixed rate mortgage loans are originated for terms of up to 30 years.  Generally, fixed rate residential mortgage loans are underwritten according to Freddie Mac guidelines, policies and procedures, with a maximum origination amount of $2.0 million.  Oritani Bank's residential underwriting satisfies the "qualified mortgages" regulations issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.  Oritani Bank does not originate non-qualified mortgage loans.  We do not originate or purchase, and our loan portfolio does not include, any sub-prime loans.

We also offer adjustable rate mortgage loans for one to four family properties, with an interest rate based on the weekly average yield on U.S. Treasuries adjusted to a constant maturity of one-year, which adjust either annually or every three years from the outset of the loan or which adjust annually after a five-, seven- or ten-year initial fixed rate period.  Originations of adjustable rate residential mortgage loans totaled $10.2 million and $12.6 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  Our adjustable rate residential mortgage loans generally provide for maximum rate adjustments of 2% per adjustment, with a lifetime maximum adjustment up to 6%, regardless of the initial rate.  Our adjustable rate residential mortgage loans amortize over terms of up to 30 years.

Adjustable rate mortgage loans decrease the Bank's risk associated with changes in market interest rates by periodically repricing, but involve other risks because, as interest rates increase, the underlying payments by the borrower increase, thus increasing the potential for default by the borrower.  At the same time, the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely affected by higher interest rates.  Upward adjustment of the contractual interest rate is also limited by the maximum periodic and lifetime interest rate adjustments permitted by our loan documents and, therefore, the effectiveness of adjustable rate mortgage loans may be limited during periods of rapidly rising interest rates.  At June 30, 2018, $51.3 million, or 19.1%, of our residential mortgage loans had adjustable rates of interest.

In an effort to provide financing for first-time home buyers, we offer our own first-time home buyer loan program.  This program offers one to four family residential mortgage loans to qualified individuals.  These loans are underwritten and offered with terms and adjustable and fixed rates of interest similar to our other one to four family mortgage loan products.  With this program, borrowers receive a discounted mortgage interest rate and do not pay certain loan origination fees.  Such loans must be secured by an owner-occupied residence.  These loans are originated using similar underwriting guidelines as our other one to four family mortgage loans.  Such loans are originated in amounts of up to 90% of the lower of the property's appraised value or the sale price.  Private mortgage insurance is not required for such loans.  The maximum amount of such loan is $275,000.  We also participate in the Federal Home Loan Bank's ("FHLB") Mortgage Partnership Finance ("MPF") program.  The MPF program offers potentially lower rates to qualified individuals on one to four family residential mortgage loans and provides the Bank with additional opportunity for income.  Loans originated through the MPF program can be sold to FHLB with minimal recourse to the Bank.

We also offer our directors, officers and employees who satisfy certain criteria and our general underwriting standards fixed or adjustable rate loan products with reduced interest rates, excluding loans originated through the MPF program.  These loans adhere to all other terms and conditions contained in the loan policy.

All residential mortgage loans that we originate include "due-on-sale" clauses, which give us the right to declare a loan immediately due and payable in the event that, among other things, the borrower sells or otherwise disposes of the real property subject to the mortgage and the loan is not repaid.  Regulations limit the amount that a savings bank may lend relative to the appraised value of the real estate securing the loan, as determined by an appraisal of the property at the time the loan is originated.  All borrowers are required to obtain title insurance for the benefit of Oritani Bank.  We also require homeowner's insurance and fire and casualty insurance and, where circumstances warrant, flood insurance on properties securing real estate loans.

We also offer second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit, which are included in the residential mortgage loan portfolio.  These mortgage loans are secured by one to four family residences, substantially all of which are located in our primary market area.  At June 30, 2018, second mortgage and equity loans totaled $8.5 million, or 0.24% of total loans.  Additionally, at June 30, 2018, the unadvanced amounts of home equity lines of credit totaled $8.0 million.  The underwriting standards utilized for second mortgage loans and equity lines of credit include a determination of the applicant's credit history, an assessment of the applicant's ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan and the value of the collateral securing the loan.  The combined (first and second mortgage liens) loan-to-value ratio for second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit is generally limited to 70%.  Second mortgage loans are offered with fixed and adjustable rates of interest and with terms of up to 30 years.  Our home equity lines of credit have adjustable rates of interest which are indexed to the prime rate, as reported in The Wall Street Journal.

Second mortgage loans and equity loans entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly if they are secured by an asset that has a superior security interest.  In addition, equity loan collections depend on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

4

Commercial Real Estate ("CRE") Loans. We originate residential and non-residential commercial real estate mortgage loans.  At June 30, 2018, $3.30 billion, or 92.2% of our loan portfolio, consisted of commercial real estate loans.  Our residential CRE mortgage loans, $2.01 billion or  56.0% of our loan portfolio, are primarily permanent loans secured by apartment buildings and mobile home parks.  The non-residential CRE mortgage portfolio consists of grocery/credit retail CRE and other CRE.  Our grocery/credit retail CRE mortgage loans, $497.7 million or 13.9% of our loan portfolio, are primarily permanent mortgage loans secured by grocery or credit anchor tenants at multi-store, or stand alone, facilities.  Our other CRE mortgage loans, $796.6 million or 22.3% of our loan portfolio, are primarily permanent loans secured by improved property such as retail multi-stores without a credit anchor, mixed-use properties, self-storage facilities, commercial warehouses, and office buildings.  The typical CRE mortgage loan has a fixed rate of interest for the first three or five years, after which the loan reprices to a market index plus a spread, with a floor of the original rate. The fixed rate period is occasionally extended to as much as ten years.  These loans typically amortize over 30 years though we will often require shorter amortization. We also offer such loans on a self-amortizing basis with fixed rate terms up to 20 years.  References to commercial real estate loans below refer to residential and non-residential commercial real estate.

The terms and conditions of each CRE loan are tailored to the needs of the borrower and based on the financial strength of the project and any guarantors.  In reaching a decision on whether to make a commercial real estate loan, we consider the net operating income of the property, the borrower's expertise and credit history, risks inherent in the property's tenants, the global cash flows of the borrower, the value of the underlying property and other factors.  Loan to value ratios are a very important consideration.  Depending on the collateral type, our lending policies allow commercial real estate loan originations in an amount up to 80% of the appraised value or the purchase price of the property, whichever is less.  However, our maximum loan to value ratio is generally 75% on purchase  transactions and 70% on refinance transactions.  Other factors we consider, with respect to commercial real estate rental properties, include the term of the lease(s) and the quality of the tenant(s).  We generally require that the properties securing these real estate loans have debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of earnings before debt service to debt service) of at least 1.25 times.  Environmental reports are generally required for commercial real estate loans.  Commercial real estate loans made to corporations, partnerships and other business entities may require personal guarantees by the principals as warranted.  Property inspections are conducted, for most CRE loans, no less than every three years, or more frequently as warranted.

For commercial real estate loans with balances greater than $2.5 million, a borrower's financial information is monitored on an ongoing basis by requiring annual financial statement updates and payment history reviews.  We require commercial borrowers to provide annually updated financial statements and federal tax returns.  These requirements also apply to the individual principals of our commercial borrowers.  We also require borrowers with rental investment property to provide an annual report of income and expenses for the property, including a tenant list and copies of leases, as applicable.  The largest residential CRE loan in our portfolio at June 30, 2018 was a $32.7 million loan secured by multi-family and buildings located in Brooklyn, New York.  The largest credit retail CRE loan at June 30, 2018 was a $30.1 million loan secured by several freestanding pharmacy stores, located in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Connecticut.  The largest other CRE loan in our portfolio at June 30, 2018 was a $26.3 million loan secured by multi-tenant and mixed use buildings located in Bronx, New York.  All of these loans are performing in accordance with their terms.  Our largest commercial real estate relationship consisted of 42 properties primarily secured by multi-family buildings located mainly in our primary market area. The aggregate outstanding loan balance for this relationship, comprised of several legal entities, is $63.1 million at June 30, 2018, and these loans are all performing in accordance with their terms.

Loans secured by commercial real estate (residential and non-residential) generally involve larger principal amounts and a greater degree of risk than one to four family residential mortgage loans.  Because payments on loans secured by commercial real estate are often dependent on successful operation or management of the properties, repayment of such loans may be affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.  See "Item 1A, Risk Factors – Our Continued Emphasis On Commercial Real Estate Lending Could Expose Us To Increased Lending Risks."

       We originate construction loans for the development of residential and commercial properties located in our primary market area on a limited basis.  Residential construction loans are generally offered to experienced local developers operating in our primary market area and to individuals for the construction of their personal residences.  At June 30, 2018, construction and land loans totaled $11.0 million, or 0.3 % of total loans.

5

Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations and Servicing of Loans. Lending activities are conducted primarily by our loan personnel operating at our corporate office as well as commercial real estate origination offices in Cherry Hill, New Jersey and New York City.  All loans originated by us are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures.  We originate both adjustable rate and fixed rate loans.  Our ability to originate fixed or adjustable rate loans is dependent upon the relative customer demand for such loans, which is affected by the current and expected future levels of market interest rates.

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, loan originations totaled $470.7 million and $732.0 million, respectively, all of which were retained by us.  Loan purchases totaled $69.2 million and $65.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.  There were no loans originated and sold under the FHLB MPF program during fiscal 2018 or 2017.

We will also participate in loans, sometimes as the "lead lender."  When we are not the lead lender, the underwriting of the loan participations closely match our own underwriting criteria and procedures.  At June 30, 2018, we had $183.1 million in loan participation interests.

At June 30, 2018, we were servicing loans sold in the amount of $2.5 million.  Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan payments, accounting for principal and interest, contacting delinquent mortgagors, supervising foreclosures and property dispositions in the event of unremedied defaults, making certain insurance and tax payments on behalf of the borrowers and generally administering the loans.

Non-Performing and Problem Assets

We commence collection efforts when a loan becomes ten days past due with system generated reminder notices.  Subsequent late charges and delinquent notices are issued and the account is monitored on a regular basis thereafter.  Collections meetings with executive management are regularly held and every delinquent loan is discussed.  When a loan is more than 30 days past due, the credit file is reviewed and, if deemed necessary, information is updated or confirmed and collateral re-evaluated.  Personal, direct contact with the borrower is attempted early in the collection process.  We make every effort to contact the borrower and develop a plan of repayment to cure the delinquency.  A summary report of all loans 30 days or more past due is reported to the Board of Directors on a monthly basis.  If no repayment plan is in process and the loan is delinquent at least two payments, the file is referred to counsel for the commencement of foreclosure or other collection efforts.

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when they are more than 90 days delinquent.  When loans are placed on a non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is fully reversed.  Once the outstanding principal balance is brought current, income is recognized to the extent the loan is deemed fully collectible.  If the deficiencies causing the delinquency are resolved, such loans may be returned to accrual status once all arrearages are resolved and a period of satisfactory payment performance, usually six months.  See additional discussion regarding our non-performing assets at June 30, 2018 in "Management Discussion and Analysis."

6

Non-Performing Assets and Restructured Loans. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our non-performing assets and troubled debt restructurings at the dates indicated.

	At June 30,
	2018 (1)			2017 (2)			2016 (3)			2015 (4)			2014 (5)
Non-performing assets	(Dollars in thousands)
Non-accrual loans:
Residential	$	6,335		$	1,556		$	931		$	1,329		$	5,350
Residential CRE		—			—			310			311			3,508
Other CRE		1,542			8,667			8,671			10,711			8,670
Construction and land loans		—			—			56			224			444
Total non-accrual loans	$	7,877		$	10,223		$	9,968		$	12,575		$	17,972
Loans greater than 90 days delinquent and still accruing	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Total non-performing loans	$	7,877		$	10,223		$	9,968		$	12,575		$	17,972
Real estate owned		1,564			140			487			4,059			3,850
Total non-performing assets	$	9,441		$	10,363		$	10,455		$	16,634		$	21,822
Ratios:
Non-performing loans to total loans		0.22	%		0.28	%		0.31	%		0.45	%		0.71	%
Non-performing assets to total assets		0.23	%		0.25	%		0.28	%		0.50	%		0.69	%
Troubled Debt Restructurings
Non-performing TDRs (included in nonaccrual loans)
Residential		174			178			184			188			3,080
Residential CRE		—			—			310			311			501
Other CRE		1,407			4,070			3,703			2,710			4,386
Construction and land loans		—			—			56			224			—
Total Non-performing TDRs	$	1,581		$	4,248		$	4,253		$	3,433		$	7,967
Performing TDRs
Other CRE		309			362			386			418			—
Total Performing TDRs		309			362			386			418			—
Total Troubled Debt Restructurings	$	1,890		$	4,610		$	4,639		$	3,851		$	7,967

(1) Included in nonaccrual loans are residential loans totaling $504,000 and other commercial real estate loans totaling $1.4 million that were less than 30 days delinquent; and residential loans totaling $617,000 that were less than 90 days delinquent.

(2) Included in nonaccrual loans are residential loans totaling $21,000 and other commercial real estate loans totaling $6.8 million that were less than 30 days delinquent; and residential loans totaling $921,000 that were less than 90 days delinquent.

(3) Included in nonaccrual loans are residential loans totaling $66,000 residential CRE loans totaling $310,000 and other commercial real estate loans totaling $7.0 million that were less than 30 days delinquent; and residential loans totaling $180,000 that were less than 90 days delinquent.

(4) Included in nonaccrual loans are residential loans totaling $425,000 and other commercial real estate loans totaling $6.1 million that were less than 30 days delinquent, and residential loans totaling $16,000, residential CRE loans totaling $311,000 and other commercial real estate loans totaling $1.1 million that were less than 90 days delinquent.

(5) Included in nonaccrual loans are residential loans totaling $3.0 million, residential CRE loans totaling $501,000, other commercial real estate loans totaling $4.1 million that were less than 30 days delinquent, and residential loans totaling $17,000 and other commercial real estate loans totaling $1.0 million that were less than 90 days delinquent.

As noted in the above table, there were nonaccrual loans of $7.9 million at June 30, 2018 and $10.2 million at June 30, 2017.  Additional interest income of $198,000 and $283,000 would have been recorded during the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, if the loans had performed in accordance with their original terms.  Interest income on these loans of $256,000 and $531,000 was included in net income for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations- Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, Provision for Loan Losses."

7

Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth our loan delinquencies by type, amount and loan relationship at the dates indicated.

	Loans Delinquent For
	60-89 Days				90 Days and over				Total
	Number		Amount		Number		Amount		Number		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
At June 30, 2018
Residential		4	$	753		7	$	5,213		11	$	5,966
Other CRE		—		—		1		135		1		135
Total		4	$	753		8	$	5,348		12	$	6,101
At June 30, 2017
Residential		4	$	1,776		7	$	614		11	$	2,390
Other CRE		—		—		3		1,897		3		1,897
Total		4	$	1,776		10	$	2,511		14	$	4,287
At June 30, 2016
Residential		3	$	531		5	$	684		8	$	1,215
Residential CRE		1		1,166		—		—		1		1,166
Other CRE		—		—		4		1,641		4		1,641
Construction and land loans		—		—		1		56		1		56
Total		4	$	1,697		10	$	2,381		14	$	4,078
At June 30, 2015
Residential		3	$	432		4	$	888		7	$	1,320
Residential CRE		1		311		—		—		1		311
Other CRE		—		—		3		3,569		3		3,569
Construction and land loans		—		—		1		224		1		224
Total		4	$	743		8	$	4,681		12	$	5,424
At June 30, 2014
Residential		1	$	214		6	$	2,374		7	$	2,588
Residential CRE		—		—		3		3,007		3		3,007
Other CRE		—		—		5		3,580		5		3,580
Construction and land loans		—		—		4		444		4		444
Total		1	$	214		18	$	9,405		19	$	9,619

In addition to the delinquent loans listed above, we had loans that were delinquent 90 days or more past due as to principal.  Typically, such loans had passed their maturity date but continued making monthly payments, keeping their interest current, while negotiating external financing or an extension from the Company.  There were no loans delinquent 90 days or more past their maturity date at June 30, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 or 2014.

Real Estate Owned. Real estate acquired by us as a result of foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until sold.  When property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of cost or fair market value at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis.  Holding costs and declines in fair value result in charges to expense after acquisition.  The Company had real estate owned of $1.6 million at June 30, 2018 and $140,000 at June 30, 2017.  The Company sold one property with book value of $140,000 during the year ended June 30, 2018.  Proceeds from the sale of real estate owned were $138,000, resulting in $2,000 loss.

Classified Assets. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") regulations provide that loans and other assets of lesser quality should be classified as "substandard," "doubtful" or "loss" assets.  An asset is considered "substandard" if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.  "Substandard" assets include those characterized by the "distinct possibility" that we will sustain "some loss" if the deficiencies are not corrected.  Assets classified as "doubtful" have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified "substandard," with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make "collection or liquidation in full," on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, "highly questionable and improbable."  Assets classified as "loss" are those considered "uncollectible" and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted.

8

We are to establish general reserves, where appropriate, for our non-impaired loan portfolio, including non-impaired loans classified as doubtful, substandard or special mention.  General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent incurred losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets.  When we classify problem assets as "loss," we are required either to establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of the amount of the asset so classified or to charge off such amount.  The Company utilizes the services of a third party loan review firm to help ensure that loans are properly classified.  They report to the Audit Committee quarterly and their scope is determined by the Audit Committee annually.  On an annual basis, the loan review firm reviews a significant portion of the existing portfolio over the course of the year, typically an aggregate of approximately 65% of the commercial real estate portfolios, including a sampling of both new and seasoned loans, a review of all "Regulation O" loans, construction loans with balances of $250,000 or more, and review of all criticized or classified CRE loans with balances of $250,000 or more.  Our determination as to the classification of our assets and the amount of our valuation allowances is subject to review by the FDIC and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance ("NJDOBI") which can order the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.  Such examinations typically occur annually.

The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified assets, including non-performing loans, at the date indicated.

	Classified Assets At June 30,
	2018					2017					2016
	Number		Amount			Number		Amount			Number		Amount
	(Dollars in thousands)
Substandard assets:
Residential		14		$	6,335		14		$	5,002		9		$	4,377
Residential CRE		—			—		1			240		1			310
Other CRE		10			5,270		21			18,312		21			19,866
Construction and land loans		—			—		—			—		1			56
Total		24		$	11,605		36		$	23,554		32		$	24,609

There were no loans  classified as doubtful or loss on June 30, 2018, 2017 or 2016. The loan portfolio is reviewed on a regular basis to determine whether any loans require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.  Not all classified assets constitute non-performing assets.

We also utilize an additional classification for assets that do not meet the definition of any of the classified assets yet contain an element that warrants a rating that is less than "pass."  We classify an asset as "special mention" if the asset has a potential weakness that warrants management's close attention.  While such assets are not impaired, management has concluded that if the potential weakness in the asset is not addressed, the value of the asset may deteriorate, adversely affecting the repayment of the asset.  Our assets classified as "special mention" totaled $14.9 million, $22.0 million and $24.4 million at June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.   See Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impaired Loans. The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on current information, that the Company will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Loans we individually classify as impaired include residential CRE, grocery/credit retail CRE, Other CRE and construction loans with balances of $1.0 million or more, unless a condition exists for loans less than $1.0 million that would increase the Bank's potential loss exposure.  Troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") are also included in impaired loans regardless of balance.  Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that each loan's carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the related collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows.  If the loan's carrying value does exceed the fair value, specific reserves are established to reduce the loan's carrying value.  For classification purposes, impaired loans are typically classified as substandard.  Impaired loans at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $9.2 million,  $13.9 million and $13.2 million, respectively.   See Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Our allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level necessary to absorb incurred loan losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable.  Management, in determining the allowance for loan losses, considers the incurred losses inherent in our loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of loan activities, along with the general economic and real estate market conditions.  Loan losses are charged to the allowance for loans losses and recoveries are credited to it.  Additions to the allowance for loan losses are provided by charges against income based on various factors which, in our judgment, deserve current recognition in estimating probable incurred losses.  We regularly review the loan portfolio and make adjustments for loan losses in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP").  The allowance for loan losses consists primarily of the following two components:

(1) Specific allowances established for impaired loans.  The amount of impairment provided for as an allowance is represented by the deficiency, if any, between the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original loan's effective interest rate or the underlying collateral value (less estimated costs to sell) if the loan is collateral dependent, and the carrying value of the loan.  No reserve is necessary if the impaired value exceeds the book value.  Impaired loans are included within the Substandard classification.

9

(2) General allowances established for incurred loan losses on a portfolio basis for loans that do not meet the definition of impaired.  The portfolio is grouped into similar risk characteristics, primarily loan type, collateral type, and internal credit risk rating.  We apply an estimated loss rate to each loan group.  The loss rates applied are based on a eight year look back period, which measures our historical charge-offs, and our loss emergence period, which represents the estimated average time between when a loss event occurs and when such loss is specifically reserved or charged off.  This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions.  Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we have established, which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

The adjustments to our loss experience are based on our evaluation of several environmental factors, including:

• actual loss history incurred on similar loans;

• changes in local, regional, national, and international economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectibility of our portfolio, including the condition of various market segments;

• changes in the nature and volume of our portfolio and in the terms of our loans;

• changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff;

• changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans;

• changes in the quality of our loan review system; and

• changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans; and

• the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations.

We evaluate the allowance for loan losses based on the combined total of the specific and general components.  Generally when the loan portfolio increases, absent other factors, our allowance for loan loss methodology results in a higher dollar amount of estimated probable incurred losses than would be the case without the increase.  Generally when the loan portfolio decreases, absent other factors, our allowance for loan loss methodology results in a lower dollar amount of estimated probable incurred losses than would be the case without the decrease.

Each quarter we evaluate the allowance for loan losses and adjust the allowance as appropriate through a provision or recovery for loan losses.  While we use the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the information used in making the evaluations.  In addition, as an integral part of their examination process, the NJDOBI and the FDIC will periodically review the allowance for loan losses.  They may require us to adjust the allowance based on their analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination.  Such examinations typically occur annually.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the fiscal years indicated.

	At or For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016			2015			2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	30,272		$	29,951		$	30,889		$	31,401		$	31,381
Charge-offs:
Residential		117			75			98			333			24
Residential CRE		—			—			—			—			1,226
Other CRE		—			13			849			380			459
Total charge-offs		117			88			947			713			1,709
Recoveries:
Residential		150			—			—			—			—
Residential CRE		—			—			—			—			10
Other CRE		225			409			9			—			17
Construction and land loans		32			—			—			1			1,002
Total recoveries		407			409			9			1			1,029
Net recoveries (charge-offs)		290			321			(938	)		(712	)		(680	)
Provision for loan losses		—			—			—			200			700
Balance at end of year	$	30,562		$	30,272		$	29,951		$	30,889		$	31,401
Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding		(0.01	)%		(0.01	)%		0.03	%		0.03	%		0.03	%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of period		0.85	%		0.84	%		0.94	%		1.10	%		1.23	%

10

The allowance for loan losses has been relatively stable.  There was no provision for loan losses during 2018, 2017 and 2016.  Improving delinquency and nonaccrual trends, changes in loan risk ratings (versus prior periods), loan growth, charge-offs and economic and business conditions continue to have a meaningful impact on the current level of provision for loan losses.  In addition, improvements in general economic and business conditions have also impacted the level of provisioning by decreasing the necessary level of general allowances despite growth in the loan portfolio.

Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category, the total loan balances by category (including loans held for sale), and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the dates indicated.  The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.

	At June 30,
	2018						2017					2016
	Allowance for Loan Losses			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
	(Dollars in thousands)
Residential		$	1,990		7.5	%	$	1,261		7.0	%	$	1,300		7.1	%
Residential CRE			17,259		56.0	%		15,794		54.0	%		12,837		50.4	%
Grocery/Credit Retail CRE			3,015		13.9	%		3,000		14.9	%		3,646		14.4	%
Other CRE			7,828		22.3	%		10,017		24.0	%		11,850		28.0	%
Construction and land loans			470		0.3	%		200		0.1	%		318		0.2	%
Total		$	30,562		100.0	%	$	30,272		100.0	%	$	29,951		100.0	%

	At June 30,
	2015						2014
	Allowance for Loan Losses			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Allowance for Loan Losses		Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
				(Dollars in thousands)
Residential		$	1,521		6.7	%	$	1,568		6.2	%
Residential CRE			10,814		44.0	%		5,327		39.2	%
Grocery/Credit Retail CRE			4,042		17.2	%		2,652		16.5	%
Other CRE			13,943		32.0	%		17,995		36.7	%
Construction and land loans			569		0.2	%		1,108		1.4	%
Unallocated			—		0.0	%		2,751		0.0	%
Total		$	30,889		100.0	%	$	31,401		100.0	%

The Company previously maintained an unallocated component related to the general allowance. Management did not target a specific unallocated percentage of the total general allocation, or total allowance for loan losses. The primary purpose of the unallocated component was to account for the inherent imprecision of the loss estimation process related primarily to periodic updating of appraisals on impaired loans, as well as periodic updating of commercial loan credit

risk ratings by loan officers and the Company's internal credit review process. Enhancements in the allowance for loan loss methodology during the year ended June 30, 2015 has eliminated the use of the unallocated component.

11

Investments

The Board of Directors is responsible for adopting our investment policy.  The investment policy is reviewed periodically by management and any changes to the policy are recommended to and subject to the approval of the Board of Directors.  Authority to make investments under the approved investment policy guidelines is delegated to appropriate officers.  While general investment strategies are developed and authorized by the Board of Directors, the execution of specific actions primarily rests with Oritani Bank's President, Chief Financial Officer and Asset/Liability Committee, which have responsibility for ensuring that the guidelines and requirements included in the investment policy are followed and that all securities are considered prudent for investment.  Each of our President, Chief Financial Officer and Asset/Liability Committee have specified authority to purchase various types of investments; all investment purchases in excess of 1% of total assets, or $41.7 million at June 30, 2018, must be approved by our Board of Directors.  All investment transactions are reviewed and ratified or approved (as the case may be) at regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of Directors.  Any investment which, subsequent to its purchase, fails to meet the guidelines of the policy is reported to the Board of Directors at its next meeting where the Board decides whether to hold or sell the investment.

New Jersey-chartered savings banks have authority to invest in various types of assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies, mortgage-backed securities, certain certificates of deposit of insured financial institutions, overnight and short-term loans to other banks and corporate debt instruments.  Oritani Financial Corp., as a Delaware corporation, may invest in equity securities subject to certain limitations.

The investment policy requires that all securities transactions be conducted in a safe and sound manner.  Investment decisions must be based upon a thorough analysis of each security instrument to determine if its quality and inherent risks fit within Oritani Bank's overall asset/liability management objectives, the effect on its risk-based capital measurement and the prospects for yield and/or appreciation.  The investment policy provides that Oritani Bank may invest in U.S Treasury notes, U.S. and state agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, and other conservative investment opportunities.  Typical investments are currently in U.S. agency or FHLB securities and government sponsored mortgage-backed securities.

Our investment portfolio at June 30, 2018, included $1.6 million in equity securities.  We also invest in mortgage-backed securities, all of which are guaranteed by government sponsored enterprises.  At June 30, 2018, our mortgage-backed securities portfolio totaled $361.7 million, or 8.7% of total assets, and consisted of $357.4 million in fixed-rate securities and $4.3 million in adjustable-rate securities, guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae.  Securities can be classified as held to maturity or available for sale at the date of purchase. We also recently started to invest in Corporate Notes. Our Corporate Notes total is $10.0 million and classified as held to maturity.

U.S. Government and Federal Agency Obligations. At June 30, 2018, our U.S. Government and federal agency securities portfolio totaled $6.8 million, all of which was classified as held to maturity.

Equity Securities. At June 30, 2018, our equity securities portfolio totaled $1.6 million, all of which were classified as available for sale.  The portfolio consists of financial industry common stock. There were no impairment charges on available for sale securities for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 or 2016.  Equity securities are not insured or guaranteed investments and are affected by market interest rates and stock market fluctuations.  Such investments are carried at their fair value and fluctuations in the fair value of such investments, including temporary declines in value, directly affect our net capital position.

Mortgage-Backed Securities. We purchase mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae.  We invest in mortgage-backed securities to achieve positive interest rate spreads with minimal administrative expense, and to lower our credit risk as a result of the guarantees provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae.  Our investment policy also authorizes the investment in collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs"), also insured or issued by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae.  We limit CMO investments to those classes of CMOs carrying the most stable cash flows and lowest prepayment risk of any class of CMOs and which pass the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council's average life restriction tests at the time of purchase.  These CMO classes are typically referred to as Planned Amortization Classes or sequentials.

Mortgage-backed securities are created by the pooling of mortgages and the issuance of a security with an interest rate which is less than the interest rate on the underlying mortgages.  Mortgage-backed securities typically represent a participation interest in a pool of single-family or multifamily mortgages, although we focus our investments on mortgage-backed securities backed by one to four family mortgages.  The issuers of such securities (generally U.S. government agencies and government sponsored enterprises, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae) pool and resell the participation interests in the form of securities to investors such as us, and guarantee the payment of principal and interest to investors.  Mortgage-backed securities generally yield less than the loans that underlie such securities because of the cost of payment guarantees and credit enhancements.  However, mortgage-backed securities are usually more liquid than individual mortgage loans and may be used to collateralize our specific liabilities and obligations.

12

At June 30, 2018, our mortgage-backed securities totaled $361.7 million, or 8.7%, of total assets and 9.2% of interest earning assets.  At June 30, 2018, 1.2% of the mortgage-backed securities were backed by adjustable rate mortgage loans and 98.8% were backed by fixed rate mortgage loans.  The mortgage-backed securities portfolio had a weighted average yield of 2.63% at June 30, 2018.  The fair value of our mortgage-backed securities at June 30, 2018 was $353.0 million, which is $9.9 million less than the amortized cost of $362.8 million.  Investments in mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual prepayments may differ from estimated prepayments over the life of the security, which may require adjustments to the amortization of any premium or accretion of any discount relating to such instruments thereby changing the net yield on such securities.  There is also reinvestment risk associated with the cash flows from such securities or if such securities are redeemed by the issuer.  In addition, the market value of such securities may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates.  All of the Company's mortgage-backed securities are insured or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae.

Corporate Notes. We purchased Corporate notes during the third quarter of 2018. These securities have been classified as held to maturity since their purchase. At June 30, 2018, corporate notes totaled $10.0 million, or 2.6% of our total securities portfolio.

Securities Portfolios. The following table sets forth the composition of our investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated.

Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities Held to Maturity

	At June 30,
	2018					2017				2016
	Amortized Cost			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations		$	6,750	$	6,633	$	6,750	$	6,696	$	6,750	$	6,752
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			220,057		214,115		141,990		140,680		75,238		76,559
Commercial MBS			13,035		12,614		13,473		13,502		18,401		18,885
Collateralized mortgage obligations			85,488		83,125		77,418		76,326		67,718		68,510
Corporate Notes			10,044		10,024		—		—		—		—
Total securities held to maturity		$	335,374	$	326,511	$	239,631	$	237,204	$	168,107	$	170,706

Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities Available for Sale

	At June 30,
	2018					2017				2016
	Amortized Cost			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities		$	601	$	1,565	$	601	$	1,498	$	601	$	1,125
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			70		71		6,974		6,921		11,106		11,321
Commercial MBS			4,074		4,137		4,220		4,406		4,359		4,713
Collateralized mortgage obligations			40,106		38,918		85,437		85,105		123,173		124,691
Total securities available for sale		$	44,851	$	44,691	$	97,232	$	97,930	$	139,239	$	141,850

13

Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2018 are summarized in the following table.  Maturities are based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments, scheduled redemptions or early redemptions that are likely to occur.

	One Year or Less					More than One Year through Five Years					More than Five Years through Ten Years					More than Ten Years					Total Securities
	Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Weighted Average Yield			Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Securities Held to Maturity
United States Government and federal agency obligations	$	1,750		1.05	%	$	5,000		1.22	%	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	6,750	$	6,633		1.18	%
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		—		—			—		—			93,549		2.51			126,508		2.84			220,057		214,115		2.70
Commercial MBS		—		—			9,022		2.54			4,013		2.66			—		—			13,035		12,614		2.58
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		—			—		—			24,047		1.79			61,441		2.79			85,488		83,125		2.51
Corporate Notes		—		—			—		—			10,044		4.48			—		—			10,044		10,024		4.48
Total securities held to maturity	$	1,750		1.05		$	14,022		2.07	%	$	131,653		2.53	%	$	187,949		2.82	%	$	335,374	$	326,511		2.67	%
Securities Available for Sale
Equity securities	$	601		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	—		—	%	$	601	$	1,565		—	%
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		4		4.50			66		4.53			—		—			—		—			70		71		4.53
Commercial MBS		—		—			4,074		4.19			—		—			—		—			4,074		4,137		4.19
Collateralized mortgage obligations		—		—			3,503		2.60			26,885		2.40			9,718		2.09			40,106		38,918		2.34
Total securities available for sale	$	605		0	%	$	7,643		3.46	%	$	26,885		2.40	%	$	9,718		2.09	%	$	44,851	$	44,691		2.48	%

14

Sources of Funds

General. Deposits have traditionally been the primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities.  We  use borrowings, primarily FHLB advances,  to supplement cash flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for interest rate risk management purposes and to manage the cost of funds.   We also use interest rate swaps to lengthen the maturities of liabilities and manage cost of funds.  In addition, funds are derived from scheduled loan payments, mortgaged-backed securities scheduled payments and prepayments, investment maturities, loan prepayments, retained earnings and income on other earning assets.  While scheduled loan payments and income on earning assets are relatively stable sources of funds, deposit inflows and outflows can vary widely and are influenced by prevailing interest rates, market conditions and levels of competition.

Deposits. Our deposits are generated primarily from residents and businesses within our primary market area including the local municipal deposit market.  We offer a selection of deposit accounts, including checking accounts (demand deposits and NOW), money market deposit accounts, savings accounts, retirement accounts and time deposits.  The Bank also accepts brokered deposits and has augmented its usage of these funds to supplement its funding sources and decrease its cost of funds.  Deposit account terms vary, with the principal differences being the minimum balance required, the amount of time the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate.

Interest rates, maturity terms, service fees and other account features are established on a periodic basis.  Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies and market rates, liquidity requirements, rates paid by competitors and growth goals.  Personalized customer service, attractive account features, long-standing relationships with customers, convenient locations, competitive rates of interest and an active marketing program are relied upon to attract and retain deposits.

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in prevailing interest rates and competition.  The variety of deposit accounts offered allows us to be competitive in obtaining funds and responding to changes in consumer demand while managing interest rate risk and minimizing interest expense.

At June 30, 2018, $1.21 billion, or 41.6% of our deposit accounts were time deposits, of which $781.7 million had maturities of one year or less.  We had brokered deposits totaling $450.4 million, $510.4 million and $253.2 million at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The following table sets forth the distribution of total deposits by account type, at the dates indicated.

	At June 30,
	2018									2017									2016
	Balance			Percent			Weighted Average Rate			Balance			Percent			Weighted Average Rate			Balance			Percent			Weighted Average Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Deposit type:
Checking accounts		$	751,735		25.79	%		0.85	%		$	706,554		24.74	%		0.62	%		$	453,136		20.05	%		0.36	%
Money market accounts			763,003		26.17	%		1.13	%			847,888		29.68	%		1.05	%			681,710		30.16	%		0.76	%
Savings accounts			188,859		6.48	%		0.28	%			177,896		6.23	%		0.23	%			165,623		7.33	%		0.24	%
Time deposits			1,211,531		41.56	%		1.62	%			1,124,140		39.35	%		1.34	%			959,534		42.46	%		1.31	%
Total deposits		$	2,915,128		100.00	%		1.21	%		$	2,856,478		100.00	%		1.01	%		$	2,260,003		100.00	%		0.88	%

As of June 30, 2018, the aggregate amount of outstanding time deposits in amounts greater than or equal to $250,000 was approximately $244.7 million.  The following table sets forth the maturity of those deposits as of June 30, 2018.

	At June 30, 2018
	(In thousands)
Three months or less	$	35,649
Over three months through six months		37,173
Over six months through one year		94,268
Over one year to three years		56,988
Over three years		20,671
Total	$	244,749

15

Borrowings. Our borrowings primarily consist of advances from the FHLB of New York and, to a lesser extent, advances from other financial institutions.  As of June 30, 2018, we had total borrowings in the amount of $596.4 million, which represented 16.53% of total liabilities, with an estimated weighted average maturity of 2.4 years and a weighted average rate of 1.88%.  At June 30, 2018, borrowings are secured by mortgage-backed securities and investment securities with a book value of $24.9 million and performing mortgage loans with an outstanding balance of $2.84 billion.

The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our FHLB advances and other borrowings at and for the periods shown:

	At or For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018				2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at end of period		$	596,372		$	642,059		$	781,623
Average balance during period		$	543,290		$	719,647		$	731,078
Maximum outstanding at any month end		$	649,860		$	928,391		$	842,194
Weighted average interest rate at end of period			1.88	%		1.59	%		1.39	%
Average interest rate during period			2.08	%		1.83	%		2.21	%

As of June 30, 2018, Oritani had interest rate swap agreements with total notional amount of $405.0 million.   Oritani will receive 1 month LIBOR from the counterparties and pay interest to the counterparties at a fixed rate.  See Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Subsidiary Activities and Joint Venture Information

Oritani Financial Corp. is the owner of Oritani Bank, Hampshire Financial LLC and Oritani LLC.  Hampshire Financial LLC and Oritani LLC are New Jersey limited liability companies that owned real estate and investments in real estate.  As of June 30, 2016, all of the investments owned by Hampshire Financial LLC and Oritani LLC had been sold, and the subsidiaries are inactive.  Proceeds from the sale of real estate investments for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $17.1 million resulting in gains of $16.0 million.

Oritani Bank has the following subsidiaries: Ormon LLC, Oritani Finance Company, Oritani Investment Corp. and Oritani Asset Corporation.  Ormon LLC is a New Jersey limited liability company that owned real estate investments in New Jersey as well as investments in joint ventures that owned income-producing commercial and residential rental properties.  As of June 30, 2017, all of the investments owned by Ormon LLC had been sold, and the subsidiary is inactive.  Proceeds from the sale of real estate investments for the years ended June 30,  2017 and 2016 were $25.3 million resulting in gains of $20.9 million and $21.5 million resulting in gains of $21.5 million, respectively.

Oritani Finance Company is a New Jersey corporation that invests in non-New Jersey residential CRE and non-residential commercial real estate loans and provides lending opportunities in New York and Pennsylvania.

Oritani Investment Corp. is a New Jersey corporation that owns Oritani Asset Corporation, a real estate investment trust, formed in 1998 for the sole purpose of acquiring mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities from Oritani Bank.

Oritani Asset Corporation's primary objective is to maximize long-term returns on equity.  At June 30, 2018, Oritani Asset Corporation had $532.7 million in assets.  Oritani Asset Corporation is taxed and operates in a manner that enables it to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Personnel

As of June 30, 2018, we had 194 full-time employees and 56 part-time employees.  Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group.  Management believes that we have good relations with our employees.

16

SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

General

Federal law allows a state savings bank, such as Oritani Bank, that qualifies as a "qualified thrift lender" (discussed below), to elect to be treated as a savings association for purposes of the savings and loan holding company provisions of the Home Owners' Loan Act, as amended ("HOLA").  Such an election results in the savings bank's holding company being regulated as savings and loan holding company rather than as a bank holding company.  At the time of its reorganization into a holding company structure, Oritani Bank elected to be treated as a savings association under the applicable provisions of the HOLA.  Accordingly, Oritani Financial Corp. is a savings and loan holding company and is required to file certain reports with, and is subject to examination by, and otherwise must comply with the rules and regulations of the Federal Reserve Board that are applicable to savings and loan holding companies.  Oritani Financial Corp. is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.

Oritani Bank is a New Jersey-chartered savings bank, and its deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Funds ("DIF") of the FDIC.  Oritani Bank is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Commissioner of the NJDOBI as the issuer of its charter, and by the FDIC as the deposit insurer and its primary federal regulator.  Oritani Bank must file reports with the NJDOBI and the FDIC concerning its activities and financial condition, and it must obtain regulatory approval prior to entering into certain transactions, such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other depository institutions and opening, closing, moving or acquiring branch offices.  The NJDOBI and the FDIC conduct periodic examinations to assess Oritani Bank's compliance with various regulatory requirements.  This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which a savings bank may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance fund and depositors.  The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes.

Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the NJDOBI, the FDIC, the FRB or the U.S. Congress, could have a material adverse impact on Oritani Financial Corp., Oritani Bank and their operations.

Certain of the regulatory requirements that are or will be applicable to Oritani Bank and Oritani Financial Corp. are described below.  This description of statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete explanation of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Oritani Bank and Oritani Financial Corp. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual statutes and regulations.

New Jersey Banking Regulation

Activity Powers. Oritani Bank derives its lending, investment and other powers primarily from the applicable provisions of the New Jersey Banking Act and its related regulations.  Under these laws and regulations, savings banks, such as Oritani Bank, generally may invest in:

(1) real estate mortgages;

(2) consumer and commercial loans;

(3) specific types of debt securities, including certain corporate debt securities and obligations of federal, state and local governments and agencies;

(4) certain types of corporate equity securities; and

(5) certain other assets.

A savings bank may also invest pursuant to a "leeway" power that permits investments not otherwise permitted by the New Jersey Banking Act.  "Leeway" investments must comply with a number of limitations on the individual and aggregate amounts of "leeway" investments.  Under this "leeway" authority, New Jersey savings banks may exercise those powers, rights, benefits or privileges authorized for national banks or out-of-state banks or for federal or out-of-state savings banks or savings associations, provided that before exercising any such power, right, benefit or privilege, prior approval by the NJDOBI by regulation or by specific authorization is required. A savings bank may also exercise trust powers upon approval of the NJDOBI. The exercise of these lending, investment and activity powers are limited by federal law and the related regulations. See "Federal Banking Regulation-Activity Restrictions on State-Chartered Banks" below.

Loans-to-One-Borrower Limitations. With certain specified exceptions, a New Jersey-chartered savings bank may not make loans or extend credit to a single borrower or to entities related to the borrower in an aggregate amount that would exceed 15% of the bank's capital funds. A savings bank may lend an additional 10% of its capital funds if the loan is secured by collateral meeting the requirements of the New Jersey Banking Act. Oritani Bank currently complies with applicable loans-to-one-borrower limitations.

Dividends. Under the New Jersey Banking Act, a stock savings bank may declare and pay a dividend on its capital stock only to the extent that the payment of the dividend would not impair the capital stock of the savings bank. In addition, a stock savings bank may not pay a dividend unless the savings bank would, after the payment of the dividend, have a surplus of not less than 50% of its capital stock, or alternatively, the payment of the dividend would not reduce the surplus. Federal law may also limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by Oritani Bank. See "-Federal Banking Regulation-Prompt Corrective Action" below.

17

Minimum Capital Requirements. Regulations of the NJDOBI impose on New Jersey-chartered depository institutions, such as Oritani Bank, minimum capital requirements similar to those imposed by the FDIC on insured state banks. See "Federal Banking Regulation-Capital Requirements."

Examination and Enforcement. The NJDOBI may examine Oritani Bank whenever it deems an examination advisable. The NJDOBI typically examines Oritani Bank at least every two years. The NJDOBI may order any savings bank to discontinue any violation of law or unsafe or unsound banking practice, and may direct any director, officer, attorney or employee of a savings bank engaged in an objectionable activity, after the NJDOBI has ordered the activity to be terminated, to show cause at a hearing before the NJDOBI why such person should not be removed.

Federal Banking Regulation

Capital Requirements. FDIC regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of capital.  Federal regulations require state banks to meet several minimum capital standards:  a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.0%, a total capital to risk-based assets of 8%, and a 4% Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio.  The existing capital requirements were effective January 1, 2015 and are the result of a final rule implementing regulatory amendments based on recommendations of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.

As noted, the risk-based capital standards for state banks require the maintenance of common equity Tier 1 capital, Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, 6% and 8%, respectively.  In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets (e.g., recourse obligations, direct credit substitutes, residual interests) are multiplied by a risk weight factor assigned by the regulations based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset.  Higher levels of capital are required for asset categories believed to present greater risk.  Common equity Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common stockholders' equity and retained earnings.  Tier 1 capital is generally defined as common equity Tier 1 and additional Tier 1 capital.  Additional Tier 1 capital includes certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries.  Total capital includes Tier 1 capital (common equity Tier 1 capital plus additional Tier 1 capital) and Tier 2 capital.  Tier 2 capital is comprised of capital instruments and related surplus, meeting specified requirements, and may include cumulative preferred stock and long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, intermediate preferred stock and subordinated debt.  Also included in Tier 2 capital is the allowance for loan and lease losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and, for institutions that have exercised an opt-out election regarding the treatment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, up to 45% of net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values.  Calculation of all types of regulatory capital is subject to deductions and adjustments specified in the regulations.  In assessing an institution's capital adequacy, the FDIC takes into consideration, not only these numeric factors, but qualitative factors as well, and has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual associations where necessary.

In addition to establishing the minimum regulatory capital requirements, the regulations limit capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments to management if the institution does not hold a "capital conservation buffer" consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted asset above the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.  The capital conservation buffer requirement is being phased in beginning January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increasing each year until fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019.  The capital conservation buffer as of January 1, 2018 is 1.875%.

        Legislation enacted in May 2018 requires the federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, to establish a Community Bank Leverage Ratio" (the ratio of a bank's tangible equity capital to average total consolidated assets) for financial institutions with assets of less than $10 billion.  A "qualifying community bank" that exceeds this ratio will be deemed to be in compliance with all other capital and leverage requirements, including the capital requirements to be considered "well capitalized" under Prompt Corrective Action statutes.  The federal banking agencies may consider a financial institution's risk profile when evaluating whether it qualifies as a community bank for purposes of the capital ratio requirement.  The federal banking agencies must set the minimum capital for the new Community Bank Leverage Ratio at not less than 8 percent and not more than 10 percent.  A financial institution can elect to be subject to this new definition.  The establishment of the community bank leverage ratio is subject to notice and comment rulemaking by the federal regulators.

 The federal banking agencies, including the FDIC, have also adopted regulations to require an assessment of an institution's exposure to declines in the economic value of a bank's capital due to changes in interest rates when assessing the bank's capital adequacy. Under such a risk assessment, examiners evaluate a bank's capital for interest rate risk on a case-by-case basis, with consideration of both quantitative and qualitative factors. Institutions with significant interest rate risk may be required to hold additional capital. According to the agencies, applicable considerations include:

• the quality of the bank's interest rate risk management process;

• the overall financial condition of the bank; and

• the level of other risks at the bank for which capital is needed.

The following table shows the Company's and the Bank's Core capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and Total risk-based capital ratios at June 30, 2018:

	At June 30, 2018
	The Company						The Bank
	Capital			Percent of Assets (1)			Capital		Percent of Assets (1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets)		$	548,122		14.82	%	$	470,857		12.73	%
Tier 1  capital (to risk-weighted assets)			548,122		14.82	%		470,857		12.73	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)			578,685		15.64	%		501,419		13.56	%
Tier 1  Leverage capital (to average assets)			548,122		13.25	%		470,857		11.38	%
Capital conservation buffer			282,759		7.64	%		205,541		5.56	%

(1) For purposes of calculating Core capital, assets are based on adjusted total leverage assets.  In calculating Tier 1 risk-based capital and total risk-based capital, assets are based on total risk-weighted assets.

As the above table shows, as of June 30, 2018, the Company and Bank were considered "well capitalized" under FDIC guidelines.

18

Prompt Corrective Action. Federal law requires, among other things, that the federal bank regulatory authorities take "prompt corrective action" with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. The FDIC's regulations define the five capital categories as follows:

An institution is classified as "well capitalized" if:

•  its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 6.5%; and

•  its ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 10%; and

•  its ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 8%; and

•  its ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is at least 5%, and it is not subject to any order or directive by the FDIC to meet a specific capital level.

An institution is classified as "adequately capitalized" if:

•  its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 4.5%; and

•  its ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 8%; and

•  its ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is at least 6%; and

•  its ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets is at least 4%.

An institution is classified as "undercapitalized" if:

•  its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is less than 4.5%; or

•  its total risk-based capital is less than 8%; or

•  its Tier 1 risk-based-capital is less than 6%; or

•  its leverage ratio is less than 4% .

An institution is classified as "significantly undercapitalized" if:

•  its ratio of common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is less than 3.0%; or

• its total risk-based capital is less than 6%;

•  its Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets is less than 4%; or

•  its leverage ratio is less than 3%.

An institution that has a tangible capital to total assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be "critically undercapitalized."

The FDIC is required, with some exceptions, to appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured state bank if that bank is "critically undercapitalized." The FDIC may also appoint a conservator or receiver for a state bank on the basis of the institution's financial condition or upon the occurrence of certain events, including:

• insolvency, or when the assets of the bank are less than its liabilities to depositors and others;

• substantial dissipation of assets or earnings through violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices;

• existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business;

• likelihood that the bank will be unable to meet the demands of its depositors or to pay its obligations in the normal course of business; and

• insufficient capital, or the incurring or likely incurring of losses that will deplete substantially all of the institution's capital with no reasonable prospect of replenishment of capital without federal assistance.

Activity Restrictions on State-Chartered Banks. Federal law and FDIC regulations generally limit the activities and investments of state-chartered FDIC insured banks and their subsidiaries to those permissible for national banks and their subsidiaries, unless such activities and investments are specifically exempted by law or consented to by the FDIC.

Before making a new investment or engaging in a new activity as principal that is not permissible for a national bank or otherwise permissible under federal law or FDIC regulations, an insured bank must seek approval from the FDIC to make such investment or engage in such activity. The FDIC will not approve the activity unless the bank meets its minimum capital requirements and the FDIC determines that the activity does not present a significant risk to the FDIC insurance funds. Certain activities of subsidiaries that are engaged in activities permitted for national banks only through a "financial subsidiary" are subject to additional restrictions.

Federal law permits a state-chartered savings bank to engage, through financial subsidiaries, in any activity in which a national bank may engage through a financial subsidiary and on substantially the same terms and conditions. In general, the law permits a national bank that is well-capitalized and well-managed to conduct, through a financial subsidiary, any activity permitted for a financial holding company other than insurance underwriting, insurance investments, real estate investment or development or merchant banking. The total assets of all such financial subsidiaries may not exceed the lesser of 45% of the bank's total assets or $50 billion. The bank must have policies and procedures to assess the financial subsidiary's risk and protect the bank from such risk and potential liability, must not consolidate the financial subsidiary's assets with the bank's and must exclude from its own assets and equity all equity investments, including retained earnings, in the financial subsidiary. State chartered savings banks may retain subsidiaries in existence as of March 11, 2000 and may engage in activities that are not authorized under federal law. Although Oritani Bank meets all conditions necessary to establish and engage in permitted activities through financial subsidiaries, it has not yet determined to do so.

19

Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Oritani Bank is a member of the DIF, which is administered by the FDIC. Deposit accounts at Oritani Bank are insured by the FDIC, generally up to a maximum of $250,000.

The FDIC imposes an assessment for deposit insurance against all insured depository institutions.  This assessment is primarily based on a risk assessment of the institution, and certain risk adjustments specified by the FDIC, with riskier institutions paying higher assessments.  Effective April 1, 2011, the FDIC implemented a requirement of the Dodd-Frank Act that it revise its assessment system to base it on each institution's total assets less tangible capital of each institution instead of deposits.  The FDIC also revised its assessment schedule so that it ranged from 2.5 basis points for the least risky institutions to 45 basis points for the riskiest.  In conjunction with the DIF achieving a 1.5% ratio, the FDIC reduced the assessment range for most banks to 1.5 basis points to 30 basis points, effective July 1, 2016.

The deposit insurance assessment rates are in addition to the assessments for payments on the bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation, or FICO, to recapitalize the now defunct Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.  The FICO payments will continue until the FICO bonds mature in 2018 through 2019.  Our expense for the assessment of deposit insurance and the FICO payments was $1.2 million and $1.4 million for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The FDIC has authority to increase deposit insurance assessments.  A material increase in insurance assessments would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of the Bank.

Federal Home Loan Bank System. Oritani Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. As a member of the FHLB of New York, Oritani Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB in an amount at least equal to 1% of the aggregate principal amount of its unpaid residential mortgage loans and similar obligations at the beginning of each year, 4.5% of its borrowings from the FHLB, or 0.2% of mortgage-related assets, whichever is greater. As of June 30, 2018, Oritani Bank was in compliance with this requirement.

Enforcement. The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority over insured savings banks, including Oritani Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist orders, to remove directors and officers and terminate deposit insurance. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and to unsafe or unsound practices.

Transactions with Affiliates of Oritani Bank. Transactions between an insured bank, such as Oritani Bank, and any of its affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and implementing regulations. An affiliate of an insured bank is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the bank. Generally, a subsidiary of a bank that is not also a depository institution or financial subsidiary is not treated as an affiliate of the bank for purposes of Sections 23A and 23B.

Section 23A:

• limits the extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in "covered transactions" with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such bank's capital stock and retained earnings, and limits all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock and retained earnings; and

• requires that all such transactions be on terms that are consistent with safe and sound banking practices.

The term "covered transaction" includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of guarantees and other similar types of transactions. Further, most loans by a bank to any of its affiliates must be secured by collateral in amounts ranging from 100% to 130% of the loan amounts. There is a general prohibition on the purchase of a low quality asset from an affiliate. In addition, any covered transaction by a bank with an affiliate and any purchase of assets or services by a bank from an affiliate must be on terms that are substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the bank, as those that would be provided to a non-affiliate.

Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. Banks are subject to the prohibitions of 12 U.S.C. Section 1972 on certain tying arrangements. A depository institution is prohibited, subject to some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a competitor of the institution.

Privacy Standards. FDIC regulations require Oritani Bank to disclose its privacy policy, including identifying with whom it shares "non-public personal information," of customers at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter. Oritani Bank does not share "non-public personal information" with third parties.

In addition, Oritani Bank is required to provide its customers with the ability to "opt-out" of having Oritani Bank share their non-public personal information with unaffiliated third parties before they can disclose such information, subject to certain exceptions.

The FDIC and other federal banking agencies adopted guidelines establishing standards for safeguarding customer information. The guidelines describe the agencies' expectations for the creation, implementation and maintenance of an information security program, which would include administrative, technical and physical safeguards appropriate to the size and complexity of the institution and the nature and scope of its activities. The standards set forth in the guidelines are intended to insure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records and protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.

20

Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws. All FDIC insured institutions have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. In connection with its examination of a state chartered savings bank, the FDIC is required to assess the institution's record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. Among other things, the current Community Reinvestment Act regulations replace the prior process-based assessment factors with an evaluation system that rates an institution based on its actual performance in meeting community needs. In particular, the current evaluation system focuses on three tests:

• a lending test, to evaluate the institution's record of making loans in its service areas;

• an investment test, to evaluate the institution's record of investing in community development projects, affordable housing, and programs benefiting low or moderate income individuals and businesses; and

• a service test, to evaluate the institution's delivery of services through its branches, ATMs and other offices.

An institution's failure to comply with the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could, at a minimum, result in an inability to receive regulatory approval for certain activities such as branching and acquisitions. Oritani Bank received a "satisfactory" Community Reinvestment Act rating in our most recently completed federal examination, which was conducted by the FDIC in 2018.

In addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from discriminating in their lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those statutes. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the FDIC, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice.

Loans to a Bank's Insiders

Federal Regulation. A bank's loans to its executive officers, directors, any owner of more than 10% or more of its stock (each, an insider) and any of certain entities affiliated with any such persons (an insider's related interest) are subject to the conditions and limitations imposed by Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and its implementing regulations. Under these restrictions, the aggregate amount of the loans to any insider and the insider's related interests may not exceed the loans-to-one-borrower limit applicable to national banks, which is comparable to the loans-to-one-borrower limit applicable to Oritani Bank. See "New Jersey Banking Regulation-Loans-to-One Borrower Limitations." All loans by a bank to all insiders and insiders' related interests in the aggregate generally may not exceed the bank's unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. With certain exceptions, loans to an executive officer, other than loans for the education of the officer's children and certain loans secured by the officer's primary residence, may not exceed the lesser of (1) $100,000 or (2) the greater of $25,000 or 2.5% of the bank's unimpaired capital and surplus. Federal regulation also requires that any proposed loan to an insider or a related interest of that insider be approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank, with any interested directors not participating in the voting, if such loan, when aggregated with any existing loans to that insider and the insider's related interests, would exceed either (1) $500,000 or (2) the greater of $25,000 or 5% of the bank's unimpaired capital and surplus.

Generally, loans to insiders must be made on substantially the same terms as, and follow credit underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those that are prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons. An exception is made for extensions of credit made pursuant to a benefit or compensation plan of a bank that is widely available to employees of the bank and that does not give any preference to insiders of the bank over other employees of the bank.

In addition, federal law prohibits extensions of credit to a bank's insiders and their related interests by any other institution that has a correspondent banking relationship with the bank, unless such extension of credit is on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and does not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.

New Jersey Regulation. Provisions of the New Jersey Banking Act impose conditions and limitations on the liabilities to a savings bank of its directors and executive officers and of corporations and partnerships controlled by such persons that are comparable in many respects to the conditions and limitations imposed on the loans and extensions of credit to insiders and their related interests under federal law, as discussed above. The New Jersey Banking Act also provides that a savings bank that is in compliance with federal law is deemed to be in compliance with such provisions of the New Jersey Banking Act.

Other Regulations

Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Oritani Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Oritani Bank's operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:

• Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

• Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

• Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;

• Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

• Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and

• rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.

21

The operations of Oritani Bank also are subject to the:

• Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;

• Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers' rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;

• Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as "Check 21"), which gives "substitute checks," such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;

• Title III of The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (referred to as the "USA PATRIOT Act"), which significantly expanded the responsibilities of financial institutions, including savings banks, in preventing the use of the U.S. financial system to fund terrorist activities. Among other provisions, the USA PATRIOT Act and the related regulations of the FRB require savings associations operating in the United States to develop new anti-money laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements, also applicable to financial institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulations; and

• The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which placed limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution's privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to "opt out" of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties.

The Dodd-Frank Act

Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") in 2010. The law is significantly changing the current bank regulatory structure and has affected the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act required various federal agencies to adopt a broad range of new implementing rules and regulations, and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting the implementing rules and regulations, and consequently, many of the details and much of the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may not be known for many years.

Certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act have had a near term effect on us. For example, the law provided for the elimination of the OTS, which was the former primary federal regulator for Oritani Financial Corp. The Federal Reserve Board assumed supervision and regulation of all savings and loan holding companies that were formerly regulated by the OTS, including Oritani Financial Corp., on July 21, 2011. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is the primary federal regulator for national banks, became the primary federal regulator for federal thrifts on the same date.

The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the federal prohibitions on paying interest on demand deposits, thus allowing businesses to have interest bearing checking accounts, as of July 21, 2011. The legislation also requires that originators of certain securitized loans retain a percentage of the risk for transferred loans, directed the FRB to regulate pricing of certain debit card interchange fees and contains a number of reforms regarding home mortgage originators.

The Dodd-Frank Act also broadened the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessments. Assessments are now based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible equity capital of a depository institution, rather than deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increase the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts had unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012.

The Dodd-Frank Act also requires publicly traded companies to give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called "golden parachute" payments, and authorized the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a company's proxy materials. The legislation also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The CFPB, which was created as of July 21, 2011, has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit "unfair, deceptive or abusive" acts and practices. The CFPB has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets continue to be examined for compliance by their applicable bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act also weakens the federal preemption rules that have been applicable for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general the ability to enforce federal consumer protection laws.  Oritani Bank has realized an increase in compliance and operational cost due to the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act.

22

The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits lenders from making residential mortgages unless the lender makes a reasonable and good faith determination that the borrower has a reasonable ability to repay the mortgage loan according to its terms. A borrower may recover statutory damages equal to all finance charges and fees paid within three years of a violation of the ability-to-repay rule and may raise a violation as a defense to foreclosure at any time. As authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB has adopted regulations defining "qualified mortgages" that would be presumed to comply with the Dodd-Frank Act's ability-to-repay rules. Under the CFPB regulations, qualified mortgages must satisfy the following criteria: (i) no negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments or a term greater than 30 years; (ii) no points or fees in excess of 3% of the loan amount for loans over $100,000; (iii) borrower's income and assets are verified and documented; and (iv) the borrower's debt-to-income ratio generally may not exceed 43%. Qualified mortgages are conclusively presumed to comply with the ability-to-repay rule unless the mortgage is a "higher cost" mortgage, in which case the presumption is rebuttable.  Oritani Bank's residential underwriting satisfies the "qualified mortgages" regulations issued by the CFPB. Oritani Bank will not originate non-qualified mortgage loans.

Holding Company Regulation

General. Oritani Financial Corp. is a non-diversified savings and loan holding company within the meaning of the HOLA. As such, Oritani Financial Corp. is registered with the Federal Reserve Board and subject to Federal Reserve Board regulations, examinations, supervision and reporting requirements. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has enforcement authority over Oritani Financial Corp and its subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Federal Reserve Board to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings institution. As a Delaware corporation, Oritani Financial Corp. is generally subject to state business organization laws. Oritani Financial Corp. is subject to the requirements of Delaware law that generally limit dividends to an amount equal to the difference between the amount by which total assets exceed total liabilities and the amount equal to the aggregate par value of the outstanding shares of capital stock. If there is no difference between these amounts, dividends are limited to net income for the current and/or preceding year. The rights of the stockholders of Oritani Financial Corp. are governed by the Delaware General Corporate Law.

Permitted Activities. Pursuant to the HOLA and federal regulations and policy, a savings and loan holding company such as Oritani Financial Corp. may generally engage in the activities permitted for financial holding companies under Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act and certain other activities that have been authorized for savings and loan holding companies by regulation.

The HOLA prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including Oritani Financial Corp., directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of another savings institution or holding company thereof, without prior regulatory approval. It also prohibits the acquisition or retention of, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of a non-subsidiary company engaged in activities other than those permitted by the HOLA, or acquiring or retaining control of an institution that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Federal Reserve Board must consider the financial and managerial resources, future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.

Any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings institutions in more than one state is prohibited, subject to two exceptions:

(i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies; and

(ii) the acquisition of a savings institution in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisitions.

Qualified Thrift Lender Test. In order for Oritani Financial Corp. to continue to be regulated as a savings and loan holding company (rather than as a bank holding company), Oritani Bank must qualify as a "qualified thrift lender" under federal law or satisfy the "domestic building and loan association" test under the Internal Revenue Code. The qualified thrift lender test requires that a savings institution maintain at least 65% of its "portfolio assets" (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets; (ii) intangible, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain "qualified thrift investments" (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed and related securities) in at least nine out of each 12 month period. Oritani Bank currently maintains the majority of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and has met the qualified thrift lender test in each of the last 12 months.

Capital. Until recently, Savings and loan holding companies were not subject to specific regulatory capital requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, required the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to depository institutions themselves.  The previously discussed final rule regarding regulatory capital requirements implements the Dodd-Frank Act's directive as to savings and loan holding companies.  The consolidated regulatory capital requirements applied to savings and loan holding companies as of January 1, 2015.  As is the case with institutions themselves, the capital conservation buffer is being phased in between 2016 and 2019.

Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act extended the "source of strength" doctrine to savings and loan holding companies. The Federal Reserve Board has issued regulations requiring that all bank and savings and loan holding companies serve as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.

Dividends. Oritani Bank must notify the Federal Reserve Board thirty days before declaring any dividend to the Company. The Federal Reserve Board may object to the payment of the dividend if it deems it to be unsafe or unsound or violative of a law, regulation or order or if the institution will be undercapitalized after the dividend. An inability of the subsidiary institution to pay dividends may restrict the parent savings and loan holding company's ability to pay dividends.

23

With respect to the payment of dividends by Oritani Financial Corp., the Federal Reserve Board has issued a supervisory letter regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies that it has also made applicable to savings and loan holding companies. In general, the supervisory letter provides that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the holding company appears consistent with the organization's capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The guidance provides for prior Federal Reserve Board review of capital distributions in certain circumstances, such as where the company's net income for the past four quarters, net of dividends previously paid over that period, is insufficient to fully fund a dividend or the company's overall rate of earnings retention is inconsistent with the company's capital needs and overall financial condition. Stock repurchases are also subject to prior regulatory review under certain circumstances. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of Oritani Financial Corp. to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions. The financial impact of a holding company on its subsidiary institution is a matter that is evaluated by the regulator and the agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the institution.

Acquisition. Under the Federal Change in Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Federal Reserve Board if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or indirect "control" of a savings and loan holding company. Under certain circumstances, a change of control may occur, and prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the company's outstanding voting stock, unless the Federal Reserve Board has found that the acquisition will not result in control of the company. A change in control definitively occurs upon the acquisition of 25% or more of the company's outstanding voting stock. Under the Change in Control Act, the Federal Reserve Board generally has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the competitive effects of the acquisition. Certain acquisitions of control of a New Jersey savings bank or its parent company require the prior approval of the NJDOBI.

Federal Securities Laws

Oritani Financial Corp.'s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Oritani Financial Corp. is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Oritani Financial Corp. common stock held by persons who are affiliates (generally officers, directors and principal stockholders) of Oritani Financial Corp. may not be resold without registration or unless sold in accordance with certain resale restrictions. If Oritani Financial Corp. meets specified current public information requirements, each affiliate of Oritani Financial Corp. is able to sell in the public market, without registration, a limited number of shares in any three-month period.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each are required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our internal controls; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors about our internal controls; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls. Oritani Financial Corp is required to report under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and has reported that it complies with such in all material respects.

FEDERAL AND STATE TAXATION

Federal Taxation

General. Oritani Financial Corp. and Oritani Bank are subject to federal income taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below.  The Company's federal return for the tax year ended December 31, 2015 is currently under audit.  On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act").  Among numerous provisions included in the Act was the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize certain pertinent federal income tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to Oritani Financial Corp. or Oritani Bank.

Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, Oritani Financial Corp. currently reports its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December 31 for filing its federal and state income tax returns.

Bad Debt Reserves. Historically, Oritani Bank has been subject to special provisions in the tax law regarding allowable tax bad debt deductions and related reserves. Tax law changes were enacted in 1996, pursuant to the Small Business Protection Act of 1996 (the "1996 Act"), that eliminated the use of the percentage of taxable income method for tax years after 1995 and required recapture into taxable income over a six year period of all bad debt reserves accumulated after 1988. Oritani Bank recaptured its reserve balance over the six-year period ended December 31, 2003.

Currently, the Oritani Bank consolidated group uses the specific charge-off method to account for bad debt deductions for income tax purposes.

24

Taxable Distributions and Recapture. Prior to the 1996 Act, bad debt reserves created prior to January 1, 1988 were subject to recapture into taxable income should Oritani Bank fail to meet certain thrift asset and definitional tests.

At June 30, 2018, our total federal pre-base year reserve was approximately $15.1 million.  However, under current law, pre-base year reserves remain subject to recapture should Oritani Bank make certain non-dividend distributions, repurchase any of its stock, pay dividends in excess of tax earnings and profits, or cease to maintain a bank charter.

Alternative Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") imposes an alternative minimum tax ("AMT") at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences ("alternative minimum taxable income" or "AMTI"). The AMT is payable to the extent such AMTI is in excess of an exemption amount and the AMT exceeds the regular income tax. Net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of AMTI. Certain payments of alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. Oritani Financial Corp. and Oritani Bank have not been subject to the AMT and have no such amounts available as credits for carryover.  As a result of the Act, AMT was eliminated effective January 1, 2018.

Net Operating Loss Carryforward. A financial institution may carry back net operating losses ("NOL") to the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years.  At June 30, 2018, Oritani Bank had no net operating loss carryforward for federal income tax purposes.  As a result of the Act, NOLs generated after December 31, 2017 can no longer be carried back but can be carried forward indefinitely.

State Taxation

New Jersey State Taxation. Oritani Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries file New Jersey Corporation Business income tax returns on a calendar year basis.  Generally, New Jersey income, which is calculated based on federal taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, is subject to New Jersey tax.  New Jersey corporate tax is imposed in an amount equal to the corporate business tax ("CBT") at 9% of taxable income or the minimum tax due per entity, whichever is greater.  However, if Oritani Investment Corp, a subsidiary of the Bank, meets certain requirements, it may be eligible to elect to be taxed as a New Jersey Investment Company, which would allow it to be taxed at a rate of 3.6%.  On July 1, 2018, the State of New Jersey enacted new legislation that imposes a temporary surtax of 2.5% for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019, and of 1.5% for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021.  The legislation also requires combined filing for members of an affiliated group for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2019, changing New Jersey's current status as a separate return state.  In addition, the legislation modifies the dividends-received deduction for tax years beginning after December 31, 2016 by reducing the amount of the exclusion from 100 percent to 95 percent for 80% or more owned subsidiaries.

New York State Taxation. Oritani Financial Corp. files New York State tax returns on a calendar year basis.  New York State imposes a corporate income tax, based on net income allocable to New York State at a rate of 6.5%.  In addition, New York State imposes a tax surcharge allocable to business activities carried on in the Metropolitan Commuter Transportation District.

New York City Taxation. Oritani Financial Corp. is also subject to the New York City Financial Corporation Tax calculated, subject to a New York City income and expense allocation, on a similar basis as the New York State Tax, at a rate of 8.85%.

Delaware State Taxation. As a Delaware holding company not earning income in Delaware, the Company is exempt from Delaware corporate income tax but is required to file annual returns and pay annual fees and a franchise tax to the state of Delaware.

The Company's New York state tax return for the tax years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 was audited during fiscal year 2018.  The Company's New Jersey, New York City, and Delaware returns are not currently under audit and have not been subject to an audit in the past five years.

25

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Future Changes in Interest Rates Could Reduce Our Profits.

Our ability to make a profit largely depends on our net interest income, which could be negatively affected by changes in interest rates. Net interest income is the difference between:

• the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities; and

• the interest expense we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings.

In addition, changes in interest rates can affect the average life of loans and mortgage-backed and related securities. A reduction in interest rates results in increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed and related securities, as borrowers refinance their debt in order to reduce their borrowing costs. This creates reinvestment risk, which is the risk that we may not be able to reinvest prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates we earned on the prepaid loans or securities. Reinvestment risk remains high in the current rate environment. Increases in interest rates may decrease loan demand and/or make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable rate loans.

In response to improving economic conditions, the Federal Reserve Board's Open Market Committee has slowly increased its federal funds rate target from a range of 0.00% - 0.25% that was in effect for several years to the current target range of 1.75% - 2.00% that was in effect at June 30, 2018. Given our liability sensitivity, our net interest rate spread and net interest margin are at risk of being reduced due to potential increases in our cost of funds that may outpace any increases in our yield on interest-earning assets.

Changes in interest rates also affect the current market value of our interest-earning securities portfolio.  Generally, the value of securities moves inversely with changes in interest rates.  At June 30, 2018 the fair value of our available for sale agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and corporate debt obligations totaled $44.7 million.  Unrealized net losses on these available for sale securities totaled approximately $160,000 at June 30, 2018 and are reported as a separate component of stockholders' equity, net of taxes.  Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale in future periods would have an adverse effect on stockholders' equity.

The Company's net interest income is particularly vulnerable to a scenario in which market interest rates "flatten." This would occur if short term interest rates were approximately the same rate as long term interest rates. In such a scenario, interest income would likely decrease and interest expense would likely increase.

We evaluate interest rate sensitivity by estimating the change in Oritani Bank's net portfolio value over a range of interest rate scenarios.  Net portfolio value is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.  At June 30, 2018, in the event of an immediate 200 basis point increase in interest rates, our financial model projects that we would experience a $87.1 million, or 14.33%, decrease in net portfolio value.  See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Management of Market Risk."

Our Continued Emphasis On Commercial Real Estate Lending Could Expose Us To Increased Lending Risks.

Our business strategy centers on continuing our emphasis on residential and non-residential commercial real estate lending.  We have grown our loan portfolio with respect to these types of loans and intend to continue to emphasize these types of lending.  At June 30, 2018, $3.30 billion, or 92.21%, of our total loan portfolio consisted of residential and non-residential commercial real estate loans.  As a result, our credit risk profile will be higher than traditional thrift institutions that have higher concentrations of one to four family residential loans.  Loans secured by residential and non-residential commercial real estate generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than one to four family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property and the income stream of the underlying property.  This risk increases during a negative economic cycle.  Additionally, such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one to four family residential mortgage loans.  Accordingly, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one to four family residential mortgage loan.  We seek to minimize these risks through our underwriting policies, which require such loans to be qualified on the basis of the property's collateral value, net income and debt service ratio; however, there is no assurance that our underwriting policies will protect us from credit-related losses.  Finally, if we foreclose on residential and non-residential commercial real estate loans, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than one to four family residential mortgage loans because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral.

26

Our business strategy of commercial real estate lending could be negatively impacted by regulatory guidance.  The FDIC has issued guidance that recommends that such loans should not exceed 300% of the bank's capital unless enhanced risk management measures are in place.  The FDIC further detailed circumstances where such balances in excess of this guideline would be considered acceptable.  The component of the Bank's commercial real estate loan portfolio impacted by the FDIC guidance as of June 30, 2018 represented 643.9% of the Bank's capital at that date.  While the FDIC has not placed restrictions on the Bank's commercial real estate lending, there can be no assurance that such restrictions will not be imposed in the future.

The largest commercial real estate loan in our portfolio at June 30, 2018 was a $32.7 million loan secured by multi-family and buildings, located in Brooklyn, New York.  Our largest loan relationship is secured by multi-family buildings located mainly in our primary market area.  The aggregate outstanding loan balance for this relationship is $63.1 million at June 30, 2018.  As discussed in "Business of Oritani Financial Corp-Lending Activities", we have been utilizing stricter underwriting for these types of loans, and curtailed our construction lending.

If the Bank Regulators Impose Limitations on Our Commercial Real Estate Lending Activities, Our Earnings Could Be Adversely Affected.

In 2006, the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (collectively, the "Agencies") issued joint guidance entitled "Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices" (the "CRE Guidance").  Although the CRE Guidance did not establish specific lending limits, it provides that a bank's commercial real estate lending exposure may receive increased supervisory scrutiny where total non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by apartment buildings, investor commercial real estate and construction and land loans, represent 300% or more of an institution's total risk-based capital and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months.  Our level of non-owner occupied commercial real estate equaled 643.88% of our total risk-based capital at June 30, 2018.  Including owner-occupied commercial real estate, our ratio of commercial real estate loans to total risk-based capital ratio would be 656.11% at June 30, 2018.

In December 2015, the Agencies released a new statement on prudent risk management for commercial real estate lending (the "2015 Statement").  In the 2015 Statement, the Agencies express concerns about easing commercial real estate underwriting standards, direct financial institutions to maintain underwriting discipline and exercise risk management practices to identify, measure and monitor lending risks, and indicate that the Agencies will continue "to pay special attention" to commercial real estate lending activities and concentrations going forward.  If the FDIC were to impose restrictions on the amount of commercial real estate loans we can hold in our portfolio, or require higher capital ratios as a result of the level of commercial real estate loans we hold, our earnings could be adversely affected. 

If Our Allowance for Loan Losses is Not Sufficient to Cover Actual Loan Losses, Our Earnings Will Decrease.

We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectibility of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and delinquency experience, and we evaluate economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover losses inherent in our loan portfolio, resulting in additions to our allowance. While our allowance for loan losses was 0.85% of total loans at June 30, 2018, material additions to our allowance could materially decrease our net income.

In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our provision for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

A New Accounting Standard will Likely Require us to Increase Our Allowance for Loan Losses and May Have a Material Adverse Effect on Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board has adopted a new accounting standard that will be effective for the Company and Oritani Bank for our first fiscal year after December 15, 2019.  This standard, referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, will require financial institutions to determine periodic estimates of lifetime expected credit losses on loans, and recognize the expected credit losses as allowances for loan losses.  This will change the current method of providing allowances for loan losses that are probable incurred, which would likely require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, and to greatly increase the types of data we would need to collect and review to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses.  Any increase in our allowance for loan losses or expenses incurred to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by recent changes in tax laws.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted in December 2017, is likely to have both positive and negative effects on our financial performance. For example, the new legislation will result in a reduction in our federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% beginning in 2018, which will have a favorable impact on our earnings and capital generation abilities. However, the new legislation also enacted limitations on certain deductions that will have an impact on the banking industry, borrowers and the market for single family residential real estate. These limitations include (1) a lower limit on the deductibility of mortgage interest on single-family residential mortgage loans, (2) the elimination of interest deductions for certain home equity loans, (3) a limitation on the deductibility of business interest expense, and (4) a limitation on the deductibility of property taxes and state and local income taxes.

27

The recent changes in the tax laws may have an adverse effect on the market for, and the valuation of, residential properties, and on the demand for such loans in the future and could make it harder for borrowers to make their loan payments. In addition, these recent changes may also have a disproportionate effect on taxpayers in states with high residential home prices and high state and local taxes, like New Jersey and New York. If home ownership becomes less attractive, demand for mortgage loans could decrease. The value of the properties securing loans in our loan portfolio may be adversely impacted as a result of the changing economics of home ownership, which could require an increase in our provision for loan losses, which would reduce our profitability and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

             Legislation in New Jersey adopted in July 2018 will increase our state income tax liability and could increase our overall tax expense. The legislation imposes a temporary surtax on corporations earning New Jersey allocated income in excess of $1 million of 2.5% for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019, and of 1.5% for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021. The new legislation also requires combined filing for members of an affiliated group for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2019, changing New Jersey's current status as a separate return state, and limits the deductibility of dividends received. These changes are not temporary. Regulations implementing the legislative changes have not yet been issued, so we cannot yet fully evaluate the impact of the legislation on our overall tax expense. However, the new legislation may cause us to lose the benefit of certain of our tax management strategies and may cause our total tax expense to increase.

Our Risk Management Program May Not Be Effective in Mitigating Risk and Reducing the Potential for Significant Losses.

Our risk management program is designed to minimize risk and loss to us. We seek to identify, measure, monitor, report and control our exposure to risk, including strategic, market, liquidity, compliance and operational risks. While we use a broad and diversified set of risk monitoring, modeling and mitigation techniques, these techniques are inherently limited because they cannot anticipate the existence or future development of currently unanticipated or unknown risks. Recent economic conditions and heightened regulatory scrutiny of the financial services industry, among other developments, have increased our level of risk. Accordingly, we could suffer losses as a result of our failure to properly anticipate and manage these risks.

Because the Nature of the Financial Services Business Involves a High Volume of Transactions, We Face Significant Operational Risks.

We operate in diverse markets and rely on the ability of our employees and systems to process a high number of transactions. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including but not limited to, the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside our company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees, errors relating to transaction processing and technology, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements, and business continuation and disaster recovery. Insurance coverage may not be available for such losses, or where available, such losses may exceed insurance limits. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards, adverse business decisions or their implementation, and customer attrition due to potential negative publicity. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control system, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, we could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action, and suffer damage to our reputation.

Risks Associated with System Failures, Interruptions, or Breaches of Security Could Negatively Affect Our Earnings.

Information technology systems are critical to our business. We use various technology systems to manage our customer relationships, general ledger, securities, deposits, and loans. We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of system failures, interruptions, and security breaches (including privacy breaches), but such events may still occur and may not be adequately addressed if they do occur. In addition any compromise of our systems could deter customers from using our products and services. Although we rely on security systems to provide security and authentication necessary to effect the secure transmission of data, these precautions may not protect our systems from compromises or breaches of security.

In addition, we outsource a majority of our data processing to certain third-party providers. If these third-party providers encounter difficulties, or if we have difficulty communicating with them, our ability to adequately process and account for transactions could be affected, and our business operations could be adversely affected. Threats to information security also exist in the processing of customer information through various other vendors and their personnel.

Attempts by hackers to damage, disrupt, or gain unauthorized access to a computer, computer system, or electronic communications network have increased in frequency, particularly on financial institutions. While we have systems in place designed to detect and prevent such cyber attacks, successful intrusions have been perpetrated at other financial institutions and we cannot guarantee that we will not be impacted by such an event.

The occurrence of any system failures, interruption, or breach of security could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business thereby subjecting us to additional regulatory scrutiny, or could expose us to litigation and possible financial liability. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

28

Risks Associated with Cyber-Security Could Negatively Affect Our Earnings.

The financial services industry has experienced an increase in both the number and severity of reported cyber attacks aimed at gaining unauthorized access to bank systems as a way to misappropriate assets and sensitive information, corrupt and destroy data, or cause operational disruptions

We have established policies and procedures to prevent or limit the impact of security breaches, but such events may still occur or may not be adequately addressed if they do occur. Although we rely on security safeguards to secure our data, these safeguards may not fully protect our systems from compromises or breaches.

We also rely on the integrity and security of a variety of third party processors, payment, clearing and settlement systems, as well as the various participants involved in these systems, many of which have no direct relationship with us. Failure by these participants or their systems to protect our customers' transaction data may put us at risk for possible losses due to fraud or operational disruption.

Our customers are also the target of cyber attacks and identity theft. Large scale identity theft could result in customers' accounts being compromised and fraudulent activities being performed in their name. We have implemented certain safeguards against these types of activities but they may not fully protect us from fraudulent financial losses.

The occurrence of a breach of security involving our customers' information, regardless of its origin, could damage our reputation and result in a loss of customers and business and subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny, and could expose us to litigation and possible financial liability. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations

Strong Competition Within Our Market Area May Limit Our Growth and Profitability.

Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market area, we compete with numerous commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms operating locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have, have greater name recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting business, and offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more aggressively than we do. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in our market area. The greater resources and deposit and loan products offered by some of our competitors may limit our ability to increase our loan and deposit balances, and/or decrease our net interest spread. For additional information see "Business of Oritani Financial Corp—Competition."

We Operate in a Highly Regulated Industry, Which Limits the Manner and Scope of Our Business Activities.

We are subject to extensive supervision, regulation and examination by the NJDOBI, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board. As a result, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, undertake new investments and activities and obtain financing. This regulatory structure is designed primarily for the protection of the DIF and our depositors, and not to benefit our stockholders. This regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to capital levels, the timing and amount of dividend payments, stock repurchases, the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. In addition, we must comply with significant anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws. Government agencies have substantial discretion to impose significant monetary penalties on institutions which fail to comply with these laws.

In December 2017, Oritani Bank (the "Bank"), the wholly owned subsidiary of Oritani Financial Corp. (the "Company"), entered into an informal agreement ("Informal Agreement") with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance ("NJDOBI") with regard to Bank Secrecy Act ("BSA") and Anti-Money Laundering ("AML") compliance matters.  The Bank has agreed to 1) develop, adopt and implement a system of internal controls designed to ensure full compliance with the BSA, 2) conduct a comprehensive system validation of the Bank's BSA/AML system, and 3) perform an initial review, and thereafter on an annual basis, of the Bank's staffing BSA staffing needs.  The Bank also agreed to review certain transactions and accounts within a specified timeframe for BSA and AML compliance, and to provide the FDIC and the NJDOBI with quarterly progress reports.

Numerous actions have been taken or initiated by the Bank to strengthen its BSA and AML compliance practices, policies, procedures and controls, and to enhance staffing in this area.  The Bank believes that it will be able to demonstrate substantial compliance with the terms of the Informal Agreement.  However, the failure to achieve compliance with the requirements of the Informal Agreement could lead to further action by the FDIC and NJDOBI, which could adversely affect the Bank. The costs to remediate are unknown and could adversely affect our future results of operations.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act has changed the bank regulatory framework, created an independent consumer protection bureau that has assumed the consumer protection responsibilities of the various federal banking agencies, and established more stringent capital standards for banks and bank holding companies. Bank regulatory agencies also have been responding aggressively to concerns and adverse trends identified in examinations. Ongoing uncertainty and adverse developments in the financial services industry and the domestic and international credit markets, and the effect of the Dodd-Frank Act and regulatory actions, may adversely affect our operations by restricting our business activities, including our ability to originate or sell loans, modify loan terms, or foreclose on property securing loans. These risks could affect the performance and value of our loan and investment securities portfolios, which also would negatively affect our financial performance.

29

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

At June 30, 2018, the Company and the Bank conducted business from its corporate headquarters in Washington Township, New Jersey,  lending offices in New York City and Cherry Hill, New Jersey and 25 full service branch offices located in Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic Counties, New Jersey.  The aggregate net book value of premises and equipment was $13.5 million at June 30, 2018.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal actions arising in the normal course of business.  In the opinion of management, the resolution of these legal actions is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our shares of common stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "ORIT". As of June 30, 2018, we have 1,752 stockholders of record (excluding the numbers of person or entities holding stock in street name through various brokerage firms), and 46,616,646 shares outstanding.  The following table presents quarterly market information for Oritani Financial Corp.'s common stock for the periods indicated.  The following high and low sales price information was provided by the NASDAQ Stock Market.

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018											2017
	High			Low			Dividends					High			Low			Dividends
First Quarter		$	17.45		$	15.30		$	0.175				$	16.74		$	15.56		$	0.175
Second Quarter			17.70			15.90			0.625	(1	)			18.95			15.35			0.675	(1	)
Third Quarter			17.30			15.05			0.250					19.00			16.30			0.175
Fourth Quarter			17.20			15.00			0.250					17.75			16.32			0.175

(1) Includes a $.45 and $.50 special dividend in 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The Company's Board of Directors intends to review the payment of dividends quarterly and plans to maintain a regular cash dividend in the future, subject to capital requirements, financial condition, results of operations, tax considerations, industry standards, economic conditions, regulatory restrictions that affect the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Company and other relevant factors.  No assurances can be given that any cash dividends will be paid or that, if paid, will not be reduced or eliminated in the future.

The sources of funds for the payment of a cash dividend are the retained proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock and earnings on those proceeds, interest and principal payments with respect to Oritani Financial Corp.'s loan to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and dividends from Oritani Bank.  For a discussion of the corporate and regulatory limitations applicable to the payment of dividends, see "Item 1. Business—Supervision and Regulation—Holding Company Regulation."

30

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total return on a hypothetical $100 investment made on June 30, 2013 in: (a) Oritani Financial Corp. stock, (b) the NASDAQ Bank Index, (c) the NASDAQ Composite Index, (d) the SNL US Thrift Index and (e) the KBW Bank Index.  The graph is calculated assuming that all dividends are reinvested during the relevant periods.  The graph shows how a $100 investment would increase or decrease in value over time based on dividends (stock or cash) and increases or decreases in the market price of the stock.

31

On March 4, 2015, the Company announced its fourth Share Repurchase Program, which authorized the purchase of an additional 5% of its outstanding shares of common stock, or 2,205,451 shares.  This stock repurchase program commenced upon the completion of the third repurchase program on March 4, 2015.  The timing of the repurchases depend on certain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the Company's liquidity and capital requirements, and alternative uses of capital.  Repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes.  The Company may also conduct repurchases through a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan.  The repurchase program has no expiration date and has 1,888,851 shares yet to be purchased as of June 30, 2018.

There were no repurchases of our equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2018.

As of August 29, 2018, the Company has repurchased, under the repurchase plans approved since the second step transaction, 13,277,681 shares of its stock at an average price of $13.30 per share.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following information is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Oritani Financial Corp. For additional information, reference is made to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Consolidated Financial Statements of Oritani Financial Corp. and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

	At June 30,
	2018		2017		2016		2015		2014
	(In thousands)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Total assets	$	4,167,039	$	4,137,684	$	3,669,338	$	3,353,065	$	3,140,200
Loans, net		3,540,903		3,566,703		3,131,957		2,756,212		2,503,894
Securities available for sale, at market value		44,691		97,930		141,850		258,963		384,137
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity		335,374		239,631		168,107		107,990		32,422
Bank owned life insurance		98,438		95,946		93,327		90,609		68,054
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost		30,365		32,504		38,003		39,898		49,046
Accrued interest receivable		11,261		10,620		9,943		9,266		10,214
Investments in real estate joint ventures, net		—		—		4,307		6,658		6,391
Real estate held for investment		—		—		—		655		917
Deposits		2,915,128		2,856,478		2,260,003		1,962,737		1,580,975
Borrowings		596,372		642,059		781,623		796,372		967,443
Stockholders' equity		559,346		559,223		535,200		517,670		526,292
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income	$	152,826	$	142,462	$	$134,324	$	$131,759	$	$128,226
Interest expense		42,900		37,851		34,023		35,009		31,103
Net interest income		109,926		104,611		100,301		96,750		97,123
Provision for loan losses		—		—		—		200		700
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		109,926		104,611		100,301		96,550		96,423
Other income		3,588		16,844		44,244		19,282		5,602
Other expense		39,504		45,929		63,716		42,716		39,478
Income before income tax expense		74,010		75,526		80,829		73,116		62,547
Income tax expense		31,116		26,382		28,534		26,214		21,488
Net income	$	42,894	$	49,144	$	52,295	$	46,902	$	41,059

32

	At or For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016			2015			2014
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
Performance Ratios:
Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)		1.04	%		1.24	%		1.50	%		1.44	%		1.40	%
Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)		7.65	%		8.98	%		9.91	%		9.10	%		7.80	%
Average interest rate spread (1)		2.65	%		2.66	%		2.89	%		2.97	%		3.29	%
Net interest margin (2)		2.79	%		2.79	%		3.04	%		3.14	%		3.50	%
Efficiency ratio (3)		34.80	%		37.82	%		44.08	%		36.81	%		38.43	%
Non-interest expense to average total assets		0.95	%		1.16	%		1.83	%		1.31	%		1.35	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities		113.01	%		113.40	%		114.96	%		115.18	%		118.42	%
Asset Quality Ratios:
Non-performing assets to total assets		0.23	%		0.25	%		0.28	%		0.50	%		0.69	%
Non-performing loans to total loans		0.22	%		0.28	%		0.31	%		0.45	%		0.71	%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.85	%		0.84	%		0.94	%		1.10	%		1.23	%
Capital Ratios:
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		14.82	%		15.02	%		16.77	%		17.79	%		19.05	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		15.64	%		15.84	%		17.69	%		18.85	%		20.19	%
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)		14.82	%		15.02	%		16.77	%		17.79	%		19.05	%
Tier I capital (to average assets)		13.25	%		13.51	%		14.94	%		15.67	%		17.11	%
Other Data:
Number of full service offices		26			26			26			25			25
Full time equivalent employees		222			221			216			209			205

(1) The average interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the period.

(2) The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets for the period.

(3) The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income before provision for loan losses and non-interest income.

33

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to operate as a well-capitalized and profitable financial institution dedicated to providing exceptional personal service to our individual and business customers.

Highlights of our business strategy are discussed below:

Continuing to focus on commercial real estate ("CRE") lending. We have focused on the origination of commercial real estate loans, comprised of residential CRE and non-residential CRE.  Such loans comprise 92.2% of our total loan portfolio at June 30, 2018.  We have focused on this type of lending because the interest rates earned for such loans generally are higher than the prevailing rates for residential loans, resulting in a greater level of interest income potential.  We are also able to generate significantly higher fee income on such loans, particularly prepayment fees.  In addition, the repayment terms usually expose us to less interest rate risk than fixed-rate residential loans.  We generally incorporate one or more of the following features into our terms for CRE loans, thereby decreasing their interest rate risk: interest rates reset after five years or less at a predetermined spread to FHLB Advance rates; minimum stated interest rates; and balloon repayment date or maximum fixed-rate self-amortizing loan term of 20 years.  CRE loans are generally considered to have a greater amount of credit risk versus 1-4 family residential lending.  We have been able to mitigate these risks, we believe, primarily through our underwriting process.  We have been involved in residential CRE lending for over thirty years. While our actual origination volume will depend on market conditions, we intend to continue our emphasis on CRE lending.

Multifamily and CRE loans net, decreased $48.1 million when compared to 2017.   Loan growth has been below expectations.   While the Company has demonstrated an ability to grow its CRE portfolio for an extended period of time, significant impediments were encountered in fiscal 2018.  These hindrances included a lower level of loan volume as well as competitor loan terms and pricing.  In addition, prepayments of the existing loan portfolio have continued at an elevated rate.

Maintaining and increasing deposits. Increasing our level of deposits, particularly core deposits, is a critical strategic objective of the Company.  The features we utilize to accomplish this objective include the implementation of an incentive program that rewards branch personnel for attracting core deposit relationships, pricing strategies designed to attract funds and increase the number of customer relationships, programs specifically designed for the municipal deposit market and promotion of our status as a local community bank.  As a result of these efforts and external factors, we have achieved strong deposit growth.  Our total deposit balances grew $1.33 billion, or 84.4%, from June 30, 2014 to June 30, 2018.  More recently, our total deposit balances grew $58.7 million, or 2.1%, from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018.  In addition to continuing to attract new customers to Oritani Bank, we will also focus on cross-selling core deposit accounts to customers who have limited deposit services with Oritani Bank and seeking to further develop the relationship by providing quality customer service as well as strategically expanding our branch network through de novo branch branching.

Continuing to emphasize operating efficiencies and cost control. One of the hallmarks of our operations has been expense control as evidenced by an efficiency ratio of 34.8% for the year ended June 30, 2018.  Our efficiency ratio, as well as numerous other expense measurement ratios, have consistently outperformed peers.  We intend to maintain our posture on expense control while continuing to make prudent investments in our operations by effectively managing costs in a relation to revenues.

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or discretion or to make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income, to be critical accounting policies. We consider the following to be our critical accounting policies.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged to income based on management's evaluation of the probable incurred losses inherent in its portfolio.  Such evaluation includes a review of all loans for which full collectability may not be reasonably assured and considers, among other matters, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions and other matters which warrant consideration.

While management uses available information to identify and recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions in the Company's lending area.  In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses.  Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.  See Note 5, "Allowance for Loan Losses" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses.

Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. If current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance may be established. We consider the determination of this valuation allowance to be a critical accounting policy because of the need to exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets, including projections of future taxable income. These judgments and estimates are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets may be required if the amounts of taxes recoverable through loss carry backs decline, or if we project lower levels of future taxable income. Such a valuation allowance would be established through a charge to income tax expense that would adversely affect our operating results.

34

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017

Total Assets.Total assets were relatively stable, increasing $29.4 million to $4.17 billion at June 30, 2018, from $4.14 billion at June 30, 2017.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents (which include fed funds and short term investments) increased $1.3 million to $34.8 million at June 30, 2018, from $33.6 million at June 30, 2017.

Net Loans.  Loans, net decreased $25.8 million to $3.54 billion at June 30, 2018, from $3.57 billion at June 30, 2017.    See "Comparison of Operating Results for the Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017-Total Interest Income" for discussion regarding loans balances.

Securities available for sale ("AFS").  Securities AFS decreased $53.2 million to $44.7 million at June 30, 2018, from $97.9 million at June 30, 2017.  The decrease is primarily due to the sale of $29.5 million in December, 2017. The securities sold were in a loss position and sold primarily to maximize the tax benefit associated with the loss. Principal payments also contributed to the decrease. No securities AFS were purchased in the 2018 fiscal year.

Securities held to maturity ("HTM").  Securities HTM increased $95.7 million to $335.4 million at June 30, 2018, from $239.6 million at June 30, 2017.  The increase is primarily due to purchases of $145.0 million exceeding principal payments.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLB") stock.  FHLB stock decreased $2.1 million to $30.4 million at June 30, 2018, from $32.5 million at June 30, 2017. FHLB stock holdings are required depending on several factors, including the level of borrowings with the FHLB. As FHLB borrowings decreased over the period, excess FHLB stock was redeemed.

Deferred Tax Assets.  Deferred tax assets decreased $11.8 million to $25.9 million at June 30, 2018, from $37.7 million at June 30, 2017. The reduction is primarily due to the revaluation of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities necessitated by the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" (the "Act") in order to reflect the future impact of lower corporate tax rates on these deferred amounts.

Other Assets.  Other assets increased $21.2 million to $30.3 million at June 30, 2018, from $9.0 million at June 30, 2017. The increase is primarily due to the increase in fair value of the derivative portfolio.

Deposits.  Deposits increased $58.7 million to $2.92 billion at June 30, 2018, from $2.86 billion at June 30, 2017.  See "Comparison of Operating Results for the Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017-Total Interest Expense" for discussion regarding deposit balances.

Borrowings.  Borrowings decreased $45.7 million to $596.4 million at June 30, 2018, from $642.1 million at June 30, 2017.  See "Comparison of Operating Results for the Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017-Total Interest Expense" for discussion regarding borrowing amounts.

Stockholders' Equity.  Stockholders' equity increased $123,000 to $559.3 million at June 30, 2018, from $559.2 million at June 30, 2017.  The increase was primarily due to net income, the release of treasury shares in conjunction with stock option exercises and the release of ESOP shares, partially offset by dividends paid. The dividends paid included regular quarterly dividends of $0.25 per share paid on May 18, 2018 and February 23, 2018 and $0.175 per share paid on August 21, 2017 and November 20, 2017; as well as a special dividend of $0.45 per share paid on December 22, 2017. Based on our June 30, 2018 closing price of $16.20 per share, the Company stock was trading at 135.0% of book value.

35

Comparison of Operating Results for the Periods Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

Net Income.  Net income decreased $6.3 million to $42.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, from $49.1 million for the corresponding 2017 period.  Results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 were impacted by the  Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Act required the Company to revalue its deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities to account for the future impact of lower corporate tax rates on these deferred amounts. This revaluation, in addition to other factors, resulted in a net charge of $8.9 million that was recognized as of December 31, 2017 and included in the results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018. Results for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 were impacted by a balance sheet restructure with an after tax cost of $13.9 million, as well as the sale of the Company's last remaining investment in real estate joint ventures. The resulting after tax gain on this sale was $13.6 million.

Total Interest Income.  The components of interest income for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, changed as follows:

	Twelve Months Ended June 30,										Increase / (decrease)
	2018					2017								Average
	Income		Yield			Income		Yield			Income			Balance			Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest on mortgage loans	$	144,051		4.05	%	$	133,967		3.99	%	$	10,084		$	201,405			0.06	%
Dividends on FHLB stock		1,788		6.55	%		1,834		5.19	%		(46	)		(8,021	)		1.36	%
Interest on securities AFS		1,504		2.14	%		3,154		1.85	%		(1,650	)		(100,278	)		0.29	%
Interest on securities HTM		5,328		2.00	%		3,500		1.86	%		1,828			78,458			0.14	%
Interest on federal funds sold and short term investments		155		1.34	%		7		0.73	%		148			10,600			0.61	%
Total interest income	$	152,826		3.88	%	$	142,462		3.80	%	$	10,364		$	182,164			0.08	%

36

The Company's primary strategic business objective is the organic growth of multifamily and commercial real estate loans.  However, the Company encountered significant obstacles in the execution of this strategy in fiscal 2018. The most noteworthy hindrance was, and remains, competitor loan terms and pricing.  This factor directly influenced the Company's lower level of loan volume and elevated level of prepayments. While Oritani has historically not been particularly competitive on loan structures with a fixed period greater than five years, Oritani has been very competitive on loan structures with a fixed period of five years or less. In fiscal 2018, Oritani's metrics for pricing such loans resulted in rates that were generally higher than those of some competitors. The Board and management ultimately determined that matching competitor rates presented undue risk to our future profitability and were willing to accept lower originations and higher prepayments. The Company is poised to return to historical levels of loan originations when market conditions improve.  The average balance of the loan portfolio increased $201.4 million, or 6.0%, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 versus the comparable 2017 period. However, when period end balances are utilized, loans, net decreased $25.8 million to $3.54 billion at June 30, 2018, from $3.57 billion at June 30, 2017.  Loan originations, purchases and payments for the twelve month ended June 30, 2018 totaled $470.7 million, $69.2 million and $566.8 million, respectively. Loan originations, purchases and payments for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 totaled $732.0 million, $65.9 million and $365.4 million, respectively.

The yield on the loan portfolio increased 6 basis points (including prepayment penalties) and was flat (excluding prepayment penalties) for the year ended June 30, 2018 versus the comparable 2017 period.  Prepayment penalties totaled $5.3 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 and $2.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017. Prepayment penalties increased annualized loan yield by 15 basis points in the 2018 period versus 9 basis points in the 2017 period.

The level of investment in FHLB stock is predicated on several factors and administered by FHLB.  The yield on this asset has increased as their dividend rate increased.  The average balance of securities available for sale decreased $100.3 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 versus the comparable 2017 period, while the average balance of securities held to maturity increased $78.5 million over the same period.  The Company has been classifying the majority of new purchases as held to maturity.  These balances were also impacted by purchases and sales.

Total Interest Expense. The components of interest expense for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, changed as follows:

	Twelve Months Ended June 30,										Increase / (decrease)
	2018					2017								Average
	Expense		Cost			Expense		Cost			Expense			Balance			Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)
Savings deposits	$	455		0.25	%	$	391		0.23	%	$	64		$	11,003			0.02	%
Money market		9,038		1.10	%		7,742		1.05	%		1,296			81,235			0.05	%
Checking accounts		4,955		0.66	%		3,015		0.46	%		1,940			91,486			0.20	%
Time deposits		17,176		1.45	%		13,523		1.33	%		3,653			165,307			0.12	%
Total deposits		31,624		1.08	%		24,671		0.95	%		6,953			349,031			0.13	%
Borrowings		11,276		2.08	%		13,180		1.83	%		(1,904	)		(176,357	)		0.25	%
Total interest expense	$	42,900		1.23	%	$	37,851		1.14	%	$	5,049		$	172,674			0.09	%

Strong deposit growth remains a critical objective for the Company.  As detailed above, the average balance of deposits increased $349.0 million, or 13.5%, for the year ended June 30, 2018 versus the comparable 2017 period. The overall cost of deposits increased 13 basis points for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 versus the comparable 2017 period. The increase is primarily due to market pressures. The cost of checking accounts increased 20 basis points over the year ended June 30, 2018. This category includes the majority of our municipal deposits. It was necessary to adjust the rates paid on these funds in order to maintain balances. Market pressures are expected to continue to increase the cost of our deposits.

The average balance of borrowings decreased $176.4 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 versus the comparable 2017 period, while the cost increased 25 basis points. The increase in the average balance of deposits allowed the Company to reduce borrowings. The cost of borrowings has been impacted by the increased cost of overnight and short-term borrowings. The cost of overnight borrowings has increased as the federal discount rate has increased. Despite the increased cost of such borrowings, they remain a lower cost of funding than longer term borrowings. The company has decreased its usage of overnight borrowings, which has contributed to the overall increase in cost of borrowings. In addition, the increased cost of new longer term borrowings also contributed to the cost increase.

37

Net Interest Income Before Provision for Loan Losses.  Net interest income increased by $5.3 million to $109.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, from $104.6 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017.  The Company's spread and margin for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 were 2.65% and 2.79%, respectively.  The spread and margin for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 were 2.66% and 2.79%, respectively.  These results were impacted by the increased level of prepayment penalty income in the 2018 periods.  The changes to spread and margin are illustrated in greater detail through the quarterly information provided in the table below. The table itemizes quarterly net interest income, and annualized spread and margin over the identified periods.

	Net Interest Income Before			Prepayment Penalty		Net Interest Income Before Provision, Excluding Prepayment		Including Prepayment Penalties						Excluding Prepayment Penalties
Quarter Ended	Provision			Income		Penalties		Spread			Margin			Spread			Margin
	(Dollars in thousands)
June 30, 2018		$	27,721	$	1,836	$	25,885		2.65	%		2.81	%		2.47	%		2.63	%
March 31, 2018			26,953		553		26,400		2.60			2.74			2.54			2.68
December 31, 2017			27,608		1,638		25,970		2.67			2.81			2.50			2.64
September 30, 2017			27,644		1,289		26,355		2.68			2.82			2.55			2.68
June 30, 2017			26,287		236		26,051		2.54			2.68			2.52			2.66

The Company's spread and margin have been significantly impacted by prepayment penalties. Due to this situation, the chart above details results with and without the impact of prepayment penalties. Net interest income before provision for loan losses, excluding prepayment penalties, is a non-GAAP financial measure since it excludes a component (prepayment penalty income) of net interest income and therefore differs from the most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Company believes the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure is useful because it provides information to assess the underlying performance of the loan portfolio since prepayment penalty income can be expected to change as interest rates change. While prepayment penalty income is expected to continue, fluctuations in the level of prepayment income are also expected. The level of prepayment income is generally expected to decrease as external interest rates increase since borrowers would have less of an incentive to refinance existing loans. However, the time period when these events occur may not align, and the specific behavior of borrowers is difficult to predict. The level of loan prepayments and prepayment income increased during fiscal 2018 despite a period of generally increasing interest rates.

The Company's spread and margin have been under pressure due to several factors including: the flattening treasury yield curve, modifications of loans within the existing loan portfolio; prepayments of higher yielding loans and investments, and increased funding costs.  The Company executed a previously disclosed balance sheet restructuring partially to counter a portion of the spread and margin compression resulting from these factors.

The Company's net interest income and net interest rate spread were negatively impacted in both periods due to the reversal of accrued interest income on loans delinquent more than 90 days.  The total of such income reversed was $198,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, and $283,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017.

38

Provision for Loan Losses.  The Company recorded no provision for loan losses for the years ended June 30, 2018 or 2017.  A rollforward of the allowance for loan losses for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 is presented below.

	Twelve months ended
	June 30,
	2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	30,272		$	29,951
Provisions charged to operations		—			—
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		407			409
Loans charged off		(117	)		(88	)
Balance at end of period	$	30,562		$	30,272
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.85	%		0.84	%
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding		(0.01	%)		(0.01	%)

Delinquency and non performing asset information is provided below:

	6/30/2018			6/30/2017			6/30/2016			6/30/2015
	(Dollars in thousands)
Delinquency Totals
30 - 59 days past due*	$	5,253		$	1,374		$	8,912		$	2,535
60 - 89 days past due*		171			1,571			1,698			416
Nonaccrual		7,877			10,223			9,968			12,575
Total	$	13,301		$	13,168		$	20,578		$	15,526
Non Performing Asset Totals
Nonaccrual loans, per above	$	7,877		$	10,223		$	9,968		$	12,575
Real Estate Owned		1564			140			487			4,059
Total	$	9,441		$	10,363		$	10,455		$	16,634
Nonaccrual loans to total loans		0.22	%		0.28	%		0.31	%		0.45	%
Delinquent loans to total loans		0.37	%		0.37	%		0.65	%		0.55	%
Non performing assets to total assets		0.23	%		0.25	%		0.28	%		0.50	%

*Excludes non-accrual loans less than 90 days past due as they are included in the non-accrual total.

Delinquent loan and non performing asset totals continue to illustrate minimal credit issues at the Company.

39

Other Income.  Total other income decreased $13.4 million to $3.6 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 from $17.0 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017.  The 2017 period included a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000 which were incurred in conjunction with a balance sheet restructure. The 2017 period also included a $20.9 million gain on the sale of real estate joint venture.

Other Expenses.  Total other expenses decreased $6.5 million to $39.5 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, from $46.0 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017.  Expenses for the 2017 period were elevated as the Company incurred $5.2 million of prepayment penalties regarding the prepayment of FHLB advances in connection with a balance sheet restructure. Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits decreased $2.3 million to $26.5 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, from $28.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease was primarily due to decreased benefit expenses partially offset by increased health insurance costs.  The accrual costs associated with several benefit plans decreased, including costs associated with the ESOP.  The decreased cost associated with the ESOP was primarily due to a decreased trading price of the Company's common stock.  In addition, the 2017 period included a portion of the amortization expense related to the Company's 2011 Equity Plan. The cost for the majority of the stock awards and stock options granted in conjunction with this plan fully amortized in August 2016. The 2018 period had significantly less expenses related to the amortization of this plan.

As disclosed in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2017, the Company entered into an informal agreement with regulators regarding Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering compliance matters.  The Company has incurred expenses associated with the remediation of these matters of $1.2 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018. These costs are included in other expenses and are primarily offset by decreases in the cost of real estate owned operations. The Company continues to expect that total costs associated with the remediation of these matters will not exceed approximately $2.0 million. In addition, there will be increases in compensation costs associated with compliance matters.

Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 was significantly impacted by the Act. Income tax expenses for the twelve months period ended June 30, 2018 $31.1 million resulting in an effective tax rate of 42.0%. The effective tax rate for the twelve-month period was elevated due to adjustments that were necessitated by the Act. The effective federal tax rate prospectively is expected to be approximately 21.0%. The effective state rate prospectively is expected to increase due to recent legislation regarding New Jersey corporate taxes. An analysis of the legislative changes and the impact to the Company is being performed and will affect the September 2018 quarter. However, we have not completed our analysis and do not have an estimate of the impact at this time.  Income tax expenses for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2017 was $26.4 million (effective rate of 34.9%). The effective tax rates for all periods were impacted by the amount of excess tax benefit associated with the exercise or vesting of stock awards that occurred during the period.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Net Income.  Net income decreased $3.2 million to $49.1 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, from $52.3 million for the corresponding 2016 period.  The primary causes of the decrease in the 2017 period were due to atypical items.  Changes in net gains on sales of assets, FHLB prepayment penalties and net loss on termination of derivatives, net of their tax effect, accounted for the majority of the periodic disparities.   Several of these items pertain to the balance sheet restructures occurring in 2017 and 2016.  See additional details under "2017 Balance Sheet Restructure" and the Company's form 10K for the year ended June 30, 2017 for details of the "2016 Balance Sheet Restructure".  Return on average assets and average equity was 1.24% and 8.98% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017, respectively.  Return on average assets and average equity was 1.50% and 9.91% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

2017 Balance Sheet restructure.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company undertook a "balance sheet restructure" to improve its net interest income and interest rate risk position.  The pretax costs associated with the execution of the restructure transaction totaled $13.9 million.  The Company realized a pretax gain of $20.6 million on the sale of an investment in real estate joint ventures during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.  Management utilized a portion of this gain to restructure the balance sheet and offset the costs associated with the restructure transaction.  The restructure transaction is expected to positively impact prospective net interest income.  The steps taken in conjunction with the current period restructure are detailed below:

· The Company prepaid a total of $117.9 million of FHLB advances with a weighted average effective cost of 2.74%.  In conjunction with the prepayments, the Company incurred costs totaling $5.2 million.

· The Company terminated $100.0 million notional of existing interest rate swaps with a weighted average pay rate obligation of 3.12%.  In conjunction with the termination, the Company incurred a loss totaling $7.9 million.  The Company also terminated a related interest rate swap for a gain of $156,000, bringing the net loss on termination of derivatives to $7.7 million.

· The Company executed $195.0 million of additional swaps.  The swaps have a weighted average life of 5.5 years, a weighted average rate of 1.72% and a weighted average total cost of 1.82%.

· The Company incurred fees totaling $270,000 in conjunction with the restructure transaction.

· The Company obtained $95 million of brokered deposits to hedge the incremental amount of new swaps.  In addition, the costs associated with its existing brokered deposit portfolio of approximately $340 million were reduced by 2.3 basis points.

· The Company committed to a new FHLB advance in the amount of $22.9 million at a rate of 1.72%.

· The Company sold $57.0 million of securities with a book yield of 1.35%.  The Company incurred a loss of $826,000 on this sale.

· The Company purchased $58.9 million of mortgage backed securities with a projected book yield of 1.95%.

· The restructure took place toward the end of the June 30, 2017 quarter and had minimal impact on the net interest spread and margin for that period.  The Company anticipates that the restructure transaction will improve margin by approximately 8 basis points prospectively.  The Company cautions that numerous other factors also impact margin.

Excluding the $13.9 million of costs associated with the restructure, net income for the three and twelve months ended June 30, 2017 would have been approximately $12.0 million (or $0.27 basic and diluted common share) and $58.2 million (or $1.35 basic and $1.31 diluted common share), respectively.

Similar restructure transactions were executed during the quarters ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.  The 2017 Balance Sheet restructure incurred total FHLBNY prepayment penalties and net loss on termination of derivatives of  $12.8 million as well as a loss on sale of securities of $826,000.  The 2016 Balance Sheet restructures incurred total FHLBNY prepayment penalties of $18.0 million and a gain on sale of securities of $990,000.

40

Total Interest Income.  The components of interest income for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, changed as follows:

	Twelve Months Ended June 30,										Increase / (decrease)
	2017					2016								Average
	Income		Yield			Income		Yield			Income			Balance			Yield
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest on mortgage loans	$	133,967		3.99	%	$	125,427		4.34	%	$	8,540		$	468,991			(0.35	)%
Dividends on FHLB stock		1,834		5.19	%		1,588		4.35	%		246			(1,173	)		0.84	%
Interest on securities AFS		3,154		1.85	%		4,566		1.99	%		(1,412	)		(58,744	)		(0.14	)%
Interest on securities HTM		3,500		1.86	%		2,737		1.95	%		763			48,147			(0.09	)%
Interest on federal funds sold
and short term investments		7		0.73	%		6		0.36	%		1			(717	)		0.37	%
Total interest income	$	142,462		3.80	%	$	134,324		4.08	%	$	8,138		$	456,504			(0.28	)%

The Company's primary strategic business objective is the organic growth of multifamily and commercial real estate loans.  The average balance of the loan portfolio increased $469.0 million, or 16.2%, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 versus the comparable 2016 period.  Loan originations, purchases and prepayments totaled $732.0 million, $65.9 million and $365.4 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.  Loan originations, purchases and prepayments totaled $710.1 million, $98.8 million and $436.3 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.

The yield on the loan portfolio decreased 35 basis points for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 versus the comparable 2016 period.  However, this result was impacted by the level of prepayment penalties.  Prepayment penalties totaled $2.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 versus $5.7 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016.  Absent prepayment penalties, the yield on the loan portfolio decreased 24 basis points over the periods.  Prepayment penalties boosted annualized loan yield by 9 basis points in the 2017 period versus 19 basis points in the 2016 period.  While there has been an extended period of downward pressure on loan yields, recent results show the trend to be ebbing.  This is occurring primarily because the yield on new loan originations has approximated the yield on the existing loan portfolio.  The Company has not adjusted its underwriting in order to boost yields on new originations.  The Company continues to minimize the fixed period of its loan originations in order to limit the interest rate risk associated with the loan portfolio.  The majority of the Company's loan originations typically have a reset of five years or less.  Market rates for new loan originations will have a material impact on the Company's ability to generate new originations that approximate or exceed the yield on the existing loan portfolio.

The average balance of securities available for sale decreased $58.7 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 versus the comparable 2016 period, while the average balance of securities held to maturity increased $48.1 million over the same period.  The Company has been classifying the majority of new purchases as held to maturity.  These balances were also impacted by purchases and sales made in conjunction with balance sheet restructures.

41

Total Interest Expense. The components of interest expense for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, changed as follows:

	Twelve Months Ended June 30,										Increase / (decrease)
	2017					2016								Average
	Expense		Cost			Expense		Cost			Expense			Balance			Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)
Savings deposits	$	391		0.23	%	$	380		0.24	%	$	11		$	11,751			(0.01	)%
Money market		7,742		1.05	%		5,034		0.77	%		2,708			84,851			0.28	%
Checking accounts		3,015		0.46	%		1,666		0.37	%		1,349			211,039			0.09	%
Time deposits		13,523		1.33	%		10,804		1.24	%		2,719			145,801			0.09	%
Total deposits		24,671		0.95	%		17,884		0.84	%		6,787			453,442			0.11	%
Borrowings		13,180		1.83	%		16,139		2.21	%		(2,959	)		(11,431	)		(0.38	)%
Total interest expense	$	37,851		1.14	%	$	34,023		1.19	%	$	3,828		$	442,011			(0.05	)%

Strong deposit growth remains a critical objective for the Company.  As detailed above, the average balance of deposits increased $453.4 million for the year ended June 30, 2017 versus the comparable 2016 period, representing growth of 21.2%.  As discussed under "2017 Balance Sheet Restructure" and "2016 Balance Sheet Restructures," brokered deposits impacted the average balance of both periods.  Absent the impact of brokered funds, the average balance of deposits increased $350.1 million for the year ended June 30, 2017 versus the comparable 2016 period, representing growth of 18.8%.  The overall cost of deposits increased 11 basis points for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 versus the comparable 2016 period.  The increased cost of money market accounts and checking accounts are primarily attributable to the costs of interest rate swaps that are being reflected as interest expense on these accounts.  The situation occurred as result of the balance sheet restructures.  The increase in the cost of time deposits is primarily due to the impact of market pressures.

As detailed in the table above, the average balance of borrowings decreased $11.4 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 versus the comparable 2016 period, and the cost decreased 38 basis points.  The increase in the average balance of deposits allowed the Company to primarily fund asset growth with deposits and reduce borrowing levels.  The cost of borrowings was impacted by the balance sheet restructures market rates, as well as the level and cost of overnight borrowings.

42

Net Interest Income Before Provision for Loan Losses.  Net interest income increased $4.3 million to $104.6 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, from $100.3 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016.  The Company's spread and margin for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 were 2.66% and 2.79%, respectively.  The spread and margin for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 were 2.89% and 3.04%, respectively.  These results were impacted by the decreased level of prepayment penalty income in the 2017 periods.  The changes to spread and margin are illustrated in greater detail through the quarterly information provided in the table below. The table itemizes quarterly net interest income, and annualized spread and margin over the identified periods.

	Net Interest Income Before			Prepayment Penalty		Net Interest Income Before Provision, Excluding Prepayment		Including Prepayment Penalties						Excluding Prepayment Penalties
Quarter Ended	Provision			Income		Penalties		Spread			Margin			Spread			Margin
	(Dollars in thousands)
June 30, 2017		$	26,287	$	236	$	26,051		2.54	%		2.68	%		2.52	%		2.66	%
March 31, 2017			26,795		821		25,974		2.63			2.75			2.54			2.67
December 31, 2016			26,229		1,199		25,030		2.72			2.86			2.59			2.73
September 30, 2016			25,300		631		24,669		2.73			2.87			2.65			2.80
June 30, 2016			25,707		1,538		24,169		2.82			2.97			2.64			2.79

Net interest income before provision for loan losses, excluding prepayment penalties, is a non-GAAP financial measure since it excludes a component (prepayment penalty income) of net interest income and therefore differs from the most directly comparable measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.  The Company believes the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure is useful because it provides information to assess the underlying performance of the loan portfolio since prepayment penalty income can be expected to change as interest rates change.  While prepayment penalty income is expected to continue, fluctuations in the level of prepayment income are also expected.  The level of prepayment income is generally expected to decrease as external interest rates increase since borrowers would have less of an incentive to refinance existing loans.

The Company's spread and margin remain under pressure due to several factors, including: the relatively flat treasury yield curve; modifications of loans within the existing loan portfolio; prepayments of higher yielding loans and investments; increased funding costs pertaining to the increases in the federal funds target rate and interest costs necessary to attract deposit balances. The increases in the discount rate and federal funds target rate by the Federal Open Market Committee in December 2015, December 2016, March 2017 and June 2017 have increased the cost of the Company's short term borrowings and indirectly increased the cost of time deposits.  These increases may also negatively impact the cost of deposits prospectively.  Longer term rates had generally risen due to market conditions since October, 2016.  However, the increases in longer term rates began to abate in March, 2017 and have generally decreased since that time.  Despite these pressures, excluding prepayment penalties, the rate of spread and margin compression has been decreasing and the Company's net interest income has continued to expand.

The Company's net interest income and net interest rate spread were negatively impacted in both periods due to the reversal of accrued interest income on loans delinquent more than 90 days.  The total of such income reversed was $283,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, and $555,000 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016.

43

Provision for Loan Losses.  The Company recorded no provision for loan losses for the years ended June 30, 2017 and  2016.  A rollforward of the allowance for loan losses for the years ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 is presented below.

	Twelve months ended
	June 30,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	29,951		$	30,889
Provisions charged to operations		—			—
Recoveries of loans previously charged off		409			9
Loans charged off		(88	)		(947	)
Balance at end of period		30,272			29,951
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.84	%		0.94	%
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding		(0.01	)%		0.03	%

Delinquency and non performing asset information is provided below:

	6/30/2017			6/30/2016			6/30/2015			6/30/2014
	(Dollars in thousands)
Delinquency Totals
30 - 59 days past due*	$	1,374		$	8,912		$	2,535		$	3,411
60 - 89 days past due*		1,571			1,698			416			214
Nonaccrual		10,223			9,968			12,575			17,972
Total	$	13,168		$	20,578		$	15,526		$	21,597
Non Performing Asset Totals
Nonaccrual loans, per above	$	10,223		$	9,968		$	12,575		$	17,972
Real Estate Owned		140			487			4,059			3,850
Total	$	10,363		$	10,455		$	16,634		$	21,822
Nonaccrual loans to total loans		0.28	%		0.31	%		0.45	%		0.71	%
Delinquent loans to total loans		0.37	%		0.65	%		0.55	%		0.85	%
Non performing assets to total assets		0.25	%		0.28	%		0.50	%		0.69	%

*Excludes non-accrual loans less than 90 days past due as they are included in the non-accrual total.

Delinquent loan and non performing asset totals continue to illustrate minimal credit issues at the Company.  Further, of the $10.2 million in loans classified as nonaccrual at June 30, 2017, $6.8 million were fully current.

44

Other Income.  Total other income decreased $27.4 million to $16.8 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 from $44.2 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016.  The results for both periods were impacted by infrequent items.  The Company continued and concluded its previously announced intention as to the strategic disposition of its investments in real estate joint ventures and real estate held for investment portfolios.  Such sales realized a pretax gain of $20.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017 versus $37.9 million for the comparable 2016 period.  Net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000 were incurred in the 2017 period in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure.  In the 2016 period, the Company realized a gain of $990,000 on the sale of securities available for sale and had no derivative losses.  Net income from investments in real estate joint ventures and income from real estate operations, net decreased by a combined $709,000 for the year ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the year ended June 30, 2016.  Earnings from these two categories decreased as the Company has now disposed of all such properties.

Other Expenses.  Total other expenses decreased $17.8 million to $45.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, from $63.7 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016.  The results for both periods were impacted by costs incurred in conjunction with balance sheet restructures.  However, there were two balance sheet restructures in the 2016 period versus one in the 2017 period.  Total FHLB prepayment penalties in the 2016 period were $18.0 million.   Total FHLB prepayment penalties in the 2017 period were $5.2 million.  See additional details under "2017 Balance Sheet Restructure" and "2016 Balance Sheet Restructures."  Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits decreased $4.9 million to $28.9 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, from $33.8 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016.  This decrease primarily pertained to the amortization cost associated with the Company's 2011 Equity Plan.  The majority of the stock awards and stock options granted in conjunction with this plan fully amortized in August 2016.  The expenses associated with this plan decreased $5.0 million between the two periods.  In addition, increases in salary expense and health insurance costs were partially offset by a decrease in ESOP expense and a net decrease in costs associated with nonqualified benefit plans.

Income Tax Expense.  Income tax expense for the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, was $26.4 million, on pre-tax income of $75.5 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 34.9%.  Income tax expense for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016, was $28.5 million, on pre-tax income of $80.8 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 35.3%.  The effective tax rates for all periods were impacted by the amount of excess tax benefit associated with the exercise or vesting of stock awards that occurred during the period.

45

Average Balances and Yields.

The following table set forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods indicated.  No tax-equivalent yield adjustments were made, as the effect thereof was not material.  All average balances are daily average balances.  Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.  The yields set forth below include the effect of deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018							2017							2016
	Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned Paid		Average Yield/ Rate			Average Outstanding Balance		Interest Earned/ Paid		Average Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans (1)	$	3,558,592	$	144,051		4.05	%	$	3,357,187	$	133,967		3.99	%	$	2,888,196	$	125,427		4.34	%
Securities available for sale		70,129		1,504		2.14	%		170,407		3,154		1.85	%		229,151		4,566		1.99	%
Securities held to maturity		267,034		5,328		2.00	%		188,576		3,500		1.86	%		140,429		2,737		1.95	%
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		27,313		1,788		6.55	%		35,334		1,834		5.19	%		36,507		1,588		4.35	%
Federal funds sold and short term investments		11,557		155		1.34	%		957		7		0.73	%		1,674		6		0.36	%
Total interest-earning assets		3,934,625		152,826		3.88	%		3,752,461		142,462		3.80	%		3,295,957		134,324		4.08	%
Non-interest-earning assets		203,782							196,441							182,675
Total assets	$	4,138,407						$	3,948,902						$	3,478,632
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits	$	183,056		455		0.25	%	$	172,053		391		0.23	%	$	160,302		380		0.24	%
Money market		820,985		9,038		1.10	%		739,750		7,742		1.05	%		654,899		5,034		0.77	%
Checking accounts		752,430		4,955		0.66	%		660,944		3,015		0.46	%		449,905		1,666		0.37	%
Time deposits		1,182,018		17,176		1.45	%		1,016,711		13,523		1.33	%		870,910		10,804		1.24	%
Total deposits		2,938,489		31,624		1.08	%		2,589,458		24,671		0.95	%		2,136,016		17,884		0.84	%
Borrowings		543,290		11,276		2.08	%		719,647		13,180		1.83	%		731,078		16,139		2.21	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,481,779		42,900		1.23	%		3,309,105		37,851		1.14	%		2,867,094		34,023		1.19	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities		95,815							92,447							83,579
Total liabilities		3,577,594							3,401,552							2,950,673
Stockholders' equity		560,813							547,350							527,959
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	4,138,407						$	3,948,902						$	3,478,632
Net interest income			$	109,926						$	104,611						$	100,301
Net interest rate spread (2)						2.65	%						2.66	%						2.89	%
Net interest-earning assets (3)	$	452,846						$	443,356						$	428,863
Net interest margin (4)						2.79	%						2.79	%						3.04	%
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities						113.01	%						113.40	%						114.96	%

(1) Includes nonaccrual loans.

(2) Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted- average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the period.

(3) Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning assets less interest-bearing liabilities.

(4) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets for the period.

46

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income for the fiscal years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total increase (decrease) column represents the sum of the prior columns.

	Years Ended June 30,									Years Ended June 30,
	2018 vs 2017									2017 vs 2016
	Increase (Decrease) Due to									Increase (Decrease) Due to
	Volume			Rate			Total Increase (Decrease)			Volume			Rate			Total Increase (Decrease)
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net	$	8,037		$	2,047		$	10,084		$	20,367		$	(11,827	)	$	8,540
Securities available for sale		(1,856	)		206			(1,650	)		(1,171	)		(241	)		(1,412	)
Securities held to maturity		1,456			372			1,828			938			(175	)		763
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		(416	)		370			(46	)		(51	)		297			246
Federal Funds sold and short term investments		78			70			148			(3	)		4			1
Total interest-earning assets		7,299			3,065			10,364		$	20,081		$	(11,943	)	$	8,138
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts		25			39			64			28			(17	)		11
Money market		850			446			1,296			652			2,056			2,708
Checking accounts		417			1,523			1,940			781			568			1,349
Time deposits		2,199			1,454			3,653			1,809			910			2,719
Total deposits		3,491			3,462			6,953			3,270			3,517			6,787
Borrowings		(3,230	)		1,326			(1,904	)		(252	)		(2,707	)		(2,959	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		261			4,788			5,049			3,018			810			3,828
Change in net interest income	$	7,038		$	(1,723	)	$	5,315		$	17,063		$	(12,753	)	$	4,310

Management of Market Risk

General. The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our assets, consisting primarily of mortgage loans, have longer maturities than our liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. As a result, a principal part of our business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and reduce the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our Board of Directors has the authority and responsibility for managing interest rate risk. Oritani Bank has established an Asset/Liability Management Committee, comprised of various members of its senior management, which is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, for recommending to the Board the level of risk that is appropriate, given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors. The Asset/Liability Management Committee reports its activities to the Board on a monthly basis. An interest rate risk analysis is presented to the Board on a quarterly basis. The Company also engages the services of an outside consultant to assist with the measurement and analysis of interest rate risk.

We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability management, we currently use the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:

(i)	originating commercial real estate loans that generally tend to have shorter interest duration and generally have interest rates that reset at five years or less (see chart below);
(ii)	investing in shorter duration securities and mortgage-backed securities;
(iii)	obtaining general financing through FHLB advances with a fixed long term;
(iv)	utilizing interest rate swaps or other derivative instruments; and
(v)	obtaining long term financing through the use of listing services.

47

The chart below provides maturity/repricing information for the entire loan portfolio, the majority of which is comprised of multifamily and commercial real estate loans.

Loan Portfolio by Reprice/Maturity Date
At June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)
			Weighted			% of Total			Cumulative
Repricing or Maturing Within:	Amount		Avg. Rate			Loans			Percent
Less than 1 year	$	659,616		3.74	%		18.43	%		18.43	%
1 - 3 years		1,322,469		3.54	%		36.96	%		55.39	%
3 - 5 years		882,995		3.90	%		24.68	%		80.07	%
5 -7 years		180,962		4.09	%		5.06	%		85.13	%
7 - 10 years		191,829		4.61	%		5.36	%		90.49	%
Greater than 10 years		340,473		4.46	%		9.51	%		100.00	%
	$	3,578,344		3.84	%		100.00	%

As of June 30, 2018, 80.07% of the portfolio mature or reprice in five years or less.

Shortening the average maturity of our interest-earning assets by increasing our investments in shorter-term loans and securities, as well as loans and securities with variable rates of interest, helps to better match the maturities and interest rates of our assets and liabilities, thereby reducing the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. In addition, if changes occur that cause the estimated duration of an available for sale security to lengthen significantly, management will consider the sale of such security. By following these strategies, we believe that we are well-positioned to react to increases in market interest rates.

Net Portfolio Value. We compute the amounts by which our net present value of cash flow from assets, liabilities and off balance sheet items (the institution's net portfolio value or "NPV") would change in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the "Change in Interest Rates" column below.

The table below sets forth, as of June 30, 2018, the estimated changes in our net portfolio value that would result from the designated instantaneous changes in the United States Treasury yield curve. Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates and loan prepayment and deposit decay rates, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results.

										NPV as a Percentage of Present Value of Assets (3)
Change in Interest		Estimated		Estimated Increase (Decrease) in NPV									Increase (Decrease)
Rates (basis points) (1)		NPV (2)		Amount			Percent			NPV Ratio (4)			(basis points)
		(Dollars in thousands)
	200	$	520,742	$	($87,097	)		(14.33	)%		13.17	%		(158	)
	100		565,112	$	(42,727	)		(7.03	)%		13.99	%		(76	)
	0		607,839		—			0.00	%		14.75	%		—
	-100		641,192	$	33,353			5.49	%		15.29	%		54

(1) Assumes an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates at all maturities.

(2) NPV is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.

(3) Present value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming cash flows on interest-earning assets.

(4) NPV Ratio represents NPV divided by the present value of assets.

The table above indicates that at June 30, 2018 in the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 5.5% increase in net portfolio value.  In the event of 200 and 100 basis point increases in interest rates, we would experience a 14.3% decrease and a 7.0% decrease in net portfolio value, respectively.  These changes in net portfolio value are within the limitations established in our asset and liability management policies.  This data does not reflect any future actions we may take in response to changes in interest rates, such as changing the mix of our assets and liabilities, which could change the results of the NPV and net interest income calculations.

48

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the above interest rate risk measurement. Modeling changes in net portfolio value require making certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value table presented assumes that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the net portfolio value table provides an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest income and will differ from actual results.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan and security repayments and maturities and sales of securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, mortgage prepayments and security prepayments and calls are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee is responsible for establishing and monitoring our liquidity targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient liquidity exists for meeting the borrowing needs of our customers as well as unanticipated contingencies. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee focuses on our level of liquid assets as well as our borrowing capacity with the FHLB. Funds can be obtained from the FHLB on a same day basis, significantly reducing the need to maintain excess liquid assets to address liquidity concerns.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of:

(i)	expected loan demand;
(ii)	expected deposit flows;
(iii)	expected payments from the loan and investment portfolios;
(iv)	funds available through borrowings;
(v)	yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities
(vi)	yields and structures available on alternate investments; and
(vii)	the objectives of our asset/liability management program

Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits and short- and intermediate-term securities.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period.  At June 30, 2018 and 2017, cash and cash equivalents totaled $34.8 million and $33.6 million, respectively.  Securities classified as available for sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $44.7 million and $97.9 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. A substantial majority of the investment portfolio, including securities available for sale, can be pledged to facilitate liquidity through a borrowing.

Our cash flows are derived from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

At June 30, 2018, we had $58.6 million in loan commitments outstanding.  In addition to commitments to originate loans, we had $14.2 million in unused lines of credit to borrowers.  Time deposits due within one year of June 30, 2018 totaled $781.7 million, or 26.82% of total deposits. . If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other time deposits and FHLB advances.  Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the time deposits.  We believe, however, based on past experience, that a significant portion of our time deposits will remain with us.  We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

Our primary investing activity currently is the origination of loans and the purchase of loans and securities. During the year ended June 30, 2018, loan originations and purchases totaled $470.7 million and $69.2 million, respectively.  During the year ended June 30, 2017, loan originations and purchases totaled $732.0 million and $65.9 million, respectively.  Security purchases during the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 totaled $145.0 million and $176.9 million, respectively.

Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts and FHLB advances.  We experienced a net increase in total deposits of $58.7 million and $596.5 million for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors.

49

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management.  If we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the FHLB of New York, which provide an additional source of funds.  Borrowings reflected a net decrease of $45.7 million and $139.6 million during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  FHLB advances have primarily been used to fund loan demand and provide longer-term sources of funding.  At June 30, 2018, the Company had additional borrowing capacity of $898.9 million with the FHLB.

Oritani Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements, including a risk-based capital measure.  The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories.  At June 30, 2018, Oritani Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements.  Oritani Bank is considered "well capitalized" under regulatory guidelines.  See "Item 1. Business—Supervision and Regulation—Federal Banking Regulation—Capital Requirements" and Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The management of liquidity described in the above paragraphs primarily pertains to Oritani Bank.  The Company, on an unconsolidated basis, also has liquidity sources and uses.  The Company's primary, recurring source of funds has been dividends from Oritani Bank.  As a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, the Bank will typically distribute its net income to the Company as a dividend.  Under the New Jersey Banking Act, a stock savings bank may declare and pay a dividend on its capital stock only to the extent that the payment of the dividend would not impair the capital stock of the savings bank. In addition, a stock savings bank may not pay a dividend unless the savings bank would, after the payment of the dividend, have a surplus of not less than 50% of its capital stock, or alternatively, the payment of the dividend would not reduce the surplus. Additionally, Oritani Bank must notify the Federal Reserve Board thirty days before declaring any dividend to the Company. The Federal Reserve Board may object to the payment of the dividend if it deems it to be unsafe or unsound or a violation of a law, regulation or order or if the institution will be undercapitalized after the dividend. An inability of Oritani Bank to pay dividends may restrict the Company's ability to pay dividends.

The Company's primary use of funds has been dividends to shareholders and repurchases of common stock.  The declarations of such dividends are at the discretion of the Company and the dividend amount could be reduced or eliminated if the payment of a dividend to shareholders would result in a liquidity concern.  The Company had previously secured external financing, a source of funds independent of the Bank.  At June 30, 2017, the Company had  $12.5 million in borrowings outstanding from another financial institution.  June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company, on an unconsolidated basis, had cash and cash equivalents of $56.6 million and $24.4 million, respectively.

50

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and unused lines of credit. While these contractual obligations represent our future cash requirements, a significant portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make. We consider commitments to extend credit in determining our allowance for loan losses. For additional information, see Note 4, "Loans," to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for premises and equipment.

The following table summarizes our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations and other funding needs by payment date at June 30, 2018. The payment amounts represent those amounts due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts or other similar carrying amount adjustments.

	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Less than One Year		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		More than Five Years		Total
	(In thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	193,735	$	197,066	$	169,076	$	36,495	$	596,372
Operating leases		769		1,173		395		34		2,371
Total	$	194,504	$	198,239	$	169,471	$	36,529	$	598,743
Commitments to extend credit	$	58,567	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	58,567
Unadvanced construction loans	$	1,781	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,781
Unused lines of credit	$	14,196	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	14,196

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

Our consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.  GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without consideration for changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on performance than the effects of inflation.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

For information regarding market risk, see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operation – Management of Market Risk."

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The Financial Statements are included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.

51

ITEM 9.  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the fiscal year (the "Evaluation Date"). Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

(b) Changes in internal controls.

The Company considers management of internal controls to be an ongoing matter. There were no changes made in our internal control over financial reporting during the Company's fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

(c) Management report on internal control over financial reporting.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of Oritani Financial Corp.; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Oritani Financial Corp.'s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2018.  In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).  Based on our assessment we believe that, as of June 30, 2018, the Company's internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Oritani Financial Corp.'s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2018. This report appears on page 55.

The Company has agreed to indemnify and hold KPMG LLP (KPMG) harmless against and from any and all legal costs and expenses incurred by KPMG in successful defense of any legal action or proceeding that arises as a result of KPMG's consent to the inclusion (or incorporation by reference) of its audit report on the Company's past financial statements included (or incorporated by reference) in this registration statement.

52

ITEM 9B.  OTHER INFORMATION

Not Applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS and CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding director nominees, incumbent directors, executive officers, the Audit Committee of the board of directors, Audit Committee financial experts and procedures by which stockholders may recommend director nominees required by this item is set forth under "Proposal I Election of Directors" under the captions "Directors," "Executive Officers," "Nominees for Directors," "Continuing Directors," "Board Meetings and Committees," "Corporate Governance, Code of Ethics and Business Conduct" and "Procedures for the Consideration of Board Candidates Submitted by Stockholders" in the Proxy Statement filed for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 20, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set forth under "General Information" under the caption "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement filed for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 20, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.

The Board has adopted a code of ethics for the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and all persons performing similar functions, and corporate governance guidelines for directors. These codes and guidelines are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conducts, the avoidance of conflicts of interest, full and accurate disclosure and compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. Both of these documents are available through links under the investor relations tab on the Company's website www.oritani.com. Amendments to and waivers from the code of ethics and corporate governance guidelines for directors are disclosed on the Company's website.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is set forth under "Proposal 1 Election of Directors" under the captions "Compensation Committee," "Executive Compensation" and "Director Compensation" in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 20, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this item regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is set forth under "General Information" under the caption "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement filed for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 20, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Set forth below is information as of June 30, 2018 regarding equity compensation plans categorized by those plans that have been approved by stockholders and those plans that have not been approved by stockholders.

Plan	Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options (1)		Weighted Average Exercise Price (2)		Number of Securities Remaining Available for Issuance Under Plan
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders		2,501,464	$	12.05		263,407(3	)
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders		—		—		—
		2,501,464	$	12.05		263,407

(1) Consists of outstanding stock options to purchase 2,501,464 shares of common stock granted under the Company's stock-base compensation plans.

(2) The weighted average exercise price reflects the exercise price of $11.95 per share for 2,429,730 stock options granted in 2011; an exercise price of $14.55 per share for 27,334 stock options granted in 2012, an exercise price of $16.19 per share for 27,600 stock options granted in 2013, an exercise price of $15.42 per share for 12,800 stock options for granted in 2014, $15.65 per share for 4,000 stock options granted in 2016, and  we issued 70,000 options at an exercise price of  $14.50  per share in 2018 under the Company's stock-based compensation plans.

(3) Represents the number of available shares that may be granted as stock options and stock awards under the Company's stock-based compensation plans.

53

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS, AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is set  forth under "Proposal I Election of Directors" under the caption "Director Independence" and "Transactions With Certain Related Persons" in the Proxy Statement filed for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 20, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is set forth under "Proposal II Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Proxy Statement filed for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on November 20, 2018 and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements

The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K.

(A)  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(B)  Consolidated Balance Sheets—at June 30, 2018 and 2017

(C)  Consolidated Statements of Income—Years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(D)  Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income—Years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(E)  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity—Years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(F)  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Years ended June June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(G)  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not Applicable

54

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Oritani Financial Corp.

Township of Washington, New Jersey

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Oritani Financial Corp. (the "Company") as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework: (2013) issued by COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements and an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.  We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/Crowe LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.

Livingston, New Jersey

August 29, 2018

55

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Oritani Financial Corp.

Township of Washington, New Jersey:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended June 30, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey September 13, 2016

56

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share data)

	June 30,
Assets	2018			2017
Cash on hand and in banks	$	23,613		$	33,252
Federal funds sold and short term investments		11,235			326
Cash and cash equivalents		34,848			33,578
Loans, net		3,540,903			3,566,703
Securities available for sale, at fair value		44,691			97,930
Securities held to maturity, fair value of $326,511 and $237,204, respectively.		335,374			239,631
Bank Owned Life Insurance (at cash surrender value)		98,438			95,946
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLB") stock, at cost		30,365			32,504
Accrued interest receivable		11,261			10,620
Real estate owned		1,564			140
Office properties and equipment, net		13,455			13,909
Deferred tax assets, net		25,864			37,693
Other assets		30,276			9,030
Total Assets	$	4,167,039		$	4,137,684
Liabilities
Deposits	$	2,915,128		$	2,856,478
Borrowings		596,372			642,059
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		24,169			23,496
Other liabilities		72,024			56,428
Total liabilities		3,607,693			3,578,461
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 56,245,065 shares issued; 46,616,646 shares outstanding at June 30, 2018 and 45,992,366 shares outstanding at June 30, 2017		562			562
Additional paid-in capital		514,002			512,337
Restricted Stock Awards		(176	)		(458	)
Treasury stock, at cost; 9,628,419 shares at June 30, 2018 and 10,252,699 shares at June 30, 2017		(129,433	)		(136,517	)
Unallocated common stock held by the employee stock ownership plan		(16,631	)		(18,407	)
Retained income		179,799			198,186
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax		11,223			3,520
Total stockholders' equity		559,346			559,223
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	4,167,039		$	4,137,684

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

57

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

Years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

	Years ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Interest income:
Interest on mortgage loans	$	144,051		$	133,967		$	125,427
Interest on securities available for sale		1,504			3,154			4,566
Interest on securities held to maturity		5,328			3,500			2,737
Dividends on FHLB stock		1,788			1,834			1,588
Interest on federal funds sold and short term investments		155			7			6
Total interest income		152,826			142,462			134,324
Interest expense:
Deposits (note 10)		31,624			24,671			17,884
Borrowings (note 12)		11,276			13,180			16,139
Total interest expense		42,900			37,851			34,023
Net interest income before provision for loan losses		109,926			104,611			100,301
Provision for loan losses (note 5)		—			—			—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		109,926			104,611			100,301
Other income:
Service charges		1,119			881			949
Net income from investments in real estate joint ventures		—			769			1,177
Bank Owned Life Insurance income		2,492			2,618			2,718
Net (loss) gain on sale of securities		(324	)		(826	)		990
Net gain on sale of assets and loans		—			20,856			37,544
Net (loss)/gain on sale of real estate owned		(2	)		—			328
Net loss on termination of derivatives		—			(7,670	)		—
Other income		303			333			625
Total other income		3,588			16,961			44,331
Operating expenses:
Compensation, payroll taxes and benefits (notes 14 and 15)		26,532			28,862			33,774
Advertising		571			502			361
Office occupancy and equipment expense (notes 9 and 16)		3,195			3,178			3,002
Data processing service fees		2,029			2,213			2,030
Federal insurance premiums		1,200			1,350			1,649
FHLBNY prepayment penalties		—			5,169			17,988
Other expenses		5,977			4,772			4,999
Total operating expenses		39,504			46,046			63,803
Income before income tax expense		74,010			75,526			80,829
Income tax expense (note 11)		31,116			26,382			28,534
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295
Basic income per common share	$	0.97		$	1.14		$	1.25
Diluted income per common share	$	0.95		$	1.10		$	1.21

 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

58

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(In thousands)

	Years ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
Net of tax:
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(745	)		(1,593	)		595
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		184			502			(562	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		6,796			8,981			(7,916	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			4,614			—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		21			246			129
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		347			842			(470	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		6,603			13,592			(8,224	)
Total comprehensive income	$	49,497		$	62,736		$	44,071

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

59

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

Years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

	Shares Outstanding			Common stock		Additional paid-in capital			Restricted Stock Awards			Treasury stock			Un- allocated common stock held by ESOP			Retained income			Accumu- lated other compre- hensive income (loss), net of tax		Total stock- holders' equity
Balance at June 30, 2017		45,992,366		$	562	$	512,337		$	(458	)	$	(136,517	)	$	(18,407	)	$	198,186		$	3,520	$	559,223
Net income		—			—		—			—			—			—			42,894			—		42,894
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			6,603		6,603
Cash dividend declared ($1.30 per share)		—			—		—			—			—			—			(57,353	)		—		(57,353	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(492,458	)		—		—			—			(7,834	)		—			—			—		(7,834	)
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock		—			—		178			—			—			—			—			—		178
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released		—			—		1,728			—			—			1,776			—			—		3,504
Exercise of stock options		1,123,738			—		—			—			15,005			—			(2,874	)		—		12,131
Vesting of restricted stock awards		—			—		(241	)		195			—			—			46			—		—
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards		(7,000	)		—		—			87			(87	)		—			—			—		—
Reclassification related to adoption of ASU 2018-02		—			—		—			—			—			—			(1,100	)		1,100		—
Balance at June 30, 2018		46,616,646		$	562	$	514,002		$	(176	)	$	(129,433	)	$	(16,631	)	$	179,799		$	11,223	$	559,346

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

60

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, continued

Years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

(Dollars in thousands)

	Shares Outstanding			Common stock		Additional paid-in capital			Restricted Stock Awards			Treasury stock			Un- allocated common stock held by ESOP			Retained income			Accumu- lated other compre- hensive income (loss), net of tax			Total stock- holders' equity
Balance at June 30, 2015		44,012,239		$	562	$	508,999		$	(8,088	)	$	(162,344	)	$	(22,803	)	$	203,192		$	(1,848	)	$	517,670
Net income		—			—		—			—			—			—			52,295			—			52,295
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			(8,224	)		(8,224	)
Cash dividend declared ($1.20 per share)		—			—		—			—			—			—			(50,007	)		—			(50,007	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(100,978	)		—		—			—			(1,593	)		—			—			—			(1,593	)
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock		—			—		5,970			—			—			—			—			—			5,970
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released		—			—		2,095			—			—			2,322			—			—			4,417
Exercise of stock options		1,332,159			—		—			—			17,704			—			(2,999	)		—			14,705
Vesting of restricted stock awards		—			—		(3,887	)		3,906			—			—			(19	)		—			—
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards		(6,000	)		—		—			73			(73	)		—			—			—			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle-adoption of ASU 2016-09		—			—		—			—			—			—			(33	)		—			(33	)
Balance at June 30, 2016		45,247,420		$	562	$	513,177		$	(4,242	)	$	(146,173	)	$	(20,481	)	$	202,429		$	(10,072	)	$	535,200
Net income		—			—		—			—			—			—			49,144			—			49,144
Other comprehensive income, net of tax		—			—		—			—			—			—			—			13,592			13,592
Cash dividend declared ($1.20 per share)		—			—		—			—			—			—			(51,850	)		—			(51,850	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(98,655	)		—		—			—			(1,574	)		—			—			—			(1,574	)
Issuance of restricted stock awards		10,000			—		—			(133	)		133			—			—			—			—
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock		—			—		1,004			—			—			—			—			—			1,004
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released		—			—		2,066			—			—			2,074			—			—			4,140
Exercise of stock options		833,601			—		—			—			11,097			—			(1,530	)		—			9,567
Vesting of restricted stock awards		—			—		(3,910	)		3,917			—			—			(7	)		—			—
Balance at June 30, 2017		45,992,366		$	562	$	512,337		$	(458	)	$	(136,517	)	$	(18,407	)	$	198,186		$	3,520		$	559,223

See accompanying notes to audited consolidated financial statements.

61

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

	Years ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
ESOP and stock-based compensation expense		3,682			5,144			10,387
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation		1,122			1,430			2,118
Depreciation of premises and equipment		810			864			910
Net amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on securities		1,170			1,322			1,145
Provision for losses on loans		—			—			—
Amortization and accretion of deferred loan fees, net		(2,692	)		(2,262	)		(3,371	)
Decrease (increase) in deferred taxes		8,763			(982	)		229
Loss (gain) on sale of securities		324			826			(990	)
Gain on sale of real estate joint ventures and real estate investments		—			(20,856	)		(37,544	)
Net loss on termination of derivatives		—			7,670			—
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate owned		2			—			(328	)
Writedown of real estate owned		—			215			250
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(2,492	)		(2,618	)		(2,718	)
Increase in accrued interest receivable		(641	)		(677	)		(677	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(11,814	)		20,194			(9,708	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		15,651			(22,195	)		16,008
Net cash provided by operating activities		56,779			37,219			28,006
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable		96,155			(366,559	)		(273,846	)
Purchase of mortgage loans		(69,227	)		(65,925	)		(98,845	)
Purchase of securities available for sale		—			(66,222	)		(42,213	)
Purchase of securities held to maturity		(144,959	)		(110,664	)		(82,591	)
Proceeds from payments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale		22,350			51,573			59,188
Proceeds from payments, calls and maturities of securities held to maturity		48,247			36,561			22,010
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		29,505			55,093			100,468
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity		—			1,995			—
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned		138			132			3,967
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		45,997			74,723			56,337
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		(43,858	)		(69,224	)		(54,442	)
Proceeds from sale of real estate joint ventures and real estate investments		—			25,318			38,614
Net increase in real estate held for investment		—			—			(23	)
Net (increase) decrease in real estate joint ventures		—			(155	)		648
Purchase of fixed assets		(356	)		(419	)		(835	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(16,008	)		(433,773	)		(271,563	)

62

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued

Years Ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	$	58,650		$	596,475		$	297,266
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		12,131			9,567			14,705
Purchase of treasury stock		(7,834	)		(1,574	)		(1,593	)
Dividends paid to shareholders		(57,353	)		(51,850	)		(50,007	)
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance		673			2,081			970
Proceeds from borrowed funds		82,683			144,130			353,433
Repayment of borrowed funds		(128,370	)		(283,694	)		(368,182	)
Payment of employee taxes withheld from shared-based awards		(81	)		(1,574	)		(1,593	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(39,501	)		413,561			244,999
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		1,270			17,007			1,442
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		33,578			16,571			15,129
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	34,848		$	33,578		$	16,571
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	42,770		$	38,085		$	34,475
Income taxes	$	22,668		$	30,103		$	27,272
Noncash transfer
Loans receivable transferred to real estate owned	$	1,564		$	—		$	317

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

63

ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Oritani Financial Corp. (the "Company"), and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Oritani Bank (the "Bank"); Hampshire Financial, LLC, and Oritani, LLC, and the wholly owned subsidiaries of Oritani Bank, Oritani Finance Company, Ormon LLC ("Ormon"), and Oritani Investment Corp., as well as its wholly owned subsidiary, Oritani Asset Corporation (a real estate investment trust), collectively, the Company. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Business

The Company provides a wide range of deposit banking services to individual and corporate customers in the New Jersey counties of Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic. The Company provides loans to individual and corporate customers in New Jersey as well as corporate customers primarily in portions of the states of New York and Pennsylvania. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

The following are the significant accounting policies which were followed in preparing and presenting these consolidated financial statements.

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2018 and 2017, and in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans.  In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, management generally obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

A substantial portion of the Company's loans are secured by real estate in the New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania markets. In addition, the real estate joint ventures and real estate owned are located in that same market. Accordingly, as with most financial institutions in the market area, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Company's loan portfolio and the recovery of the carrying amount of real estate joint ventures and real estate owned are susceptible to changes in market conditions.

Securities

Securities include debt, mortgage-backed and marketable equity securities. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities as either available for sale or held to maturity at the purchase date. Securities that may be sold in response to changing market and interest rate conditions or as part of an overall asset/liability strategy are classified as available for sale. Gains or losses on sales of securities available for sale are based upon the specific-identification method. Securities classified as available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses net of applicable taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of equity. If management has the intent and the ability at the time of purchase to hold securities until maturity, they are classified as held to maturity. Securities held to maturity are carried at cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums and discounts. Premiums and discounts on securities are accreted or amortized using the level-yield method over the estimated lives of the securities, including the effect of prepayments. Any portion of unrealized loss on an individual equity security deemed to be other than temporarily impaired is recognized as a loss in operations in the period in which such determination is made. For debt investment securities deemed other than temporarily impaired, the investment is written down through current earnings by the impairment related to the estimated credit loss and the non-credit related impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income.  In the ordinary course of business, securities are pledged as collateral in conjunction with the Company's borrowings, lines of credit and derivative portfolios.

64

Loans

Mortgages on real estate and other loans are stated at the outstanding principal amount of the loans, net of deferred loan fees/costs and the allowance for loan losses. Loan origination and commitment fees, net of related costs, are deferred and amortized as an adjustment to the loan's yield, utilizing the level yield method, over the actual lives of the related loans. Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to interest income as earned. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become delinquent 90 days or more as to principal or interest, or when it appears that principal or interest is uncollectible. Interest accrued prior to a loan being placed on nonaccrual status is subsequently reversed. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only in the period it is ultimately collected. Loans are returned to an accrual status when factors indicating doubtful collectibility no longer exist. Loans are generally charged off after an analysis is completed which indicates, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, collectibility of principal and interest is highly questionable and improbable.

The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on current information, that the Company will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans individually classified as impaired include loans which have a principal balance balances of $1.0 million or more and are ninety days or more delinquent, unless a condition exists for loans less than $1.0 million that would increase the Bank's potential loss exposure.  All TDRs are considered impaired loans, regardless of their principal balance.  Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that each loan's carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the related collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows. Residential mortgage and consumer loans are deemed smaller balance homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment and are generally excluded from the population of impaired loans.

The portion of any residential real estate mortgage loan that is not adequately secured is generally charged off when deemed to be uncollectible unless it can be clearly demonstrated that repayment will occur regardless of the delinquency status. Examples that would demonstrate repayment include; a loan that is adequately secured by collateral and is in the process of collection; a loan supported by a valid guarantee or insurance; or a loan supported by a valid claim against a solvent estate. Charge-offs of commercial real estate mortgage loans are made on the basis of management's ongoing evaluation of nonperforming loans. In the ordinary course of business, loans are pledged as collateral in conjunction with the Company's borrowings.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged to income based on management's evaluation of the probable incurred losses inherent in its portfolio.  Such evaluation includes a review of the entire loan portfolio, including all loans for which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured and considers, among other matters, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions and other matters which warrant consideration. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific reserves for individually impaired loans, (ii) reserves for adversely classified, or higher risk rated, loans that are not impaired, (iii) reserves for other loans based on historical loss factors (using the appropriate loss look-back and loss emergence periods) adjusted for both internal and external qualitative risk factors.  See Note 5, "Allowance for Loan Losses" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses and loan credit quality.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions in the Company's market area.  In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses.  Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Troubled-Debt Restructuring

Troubled debt restructured ("TDR") loans are those loans whose terms have been modified because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Modifications could include extension of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and forgiveness of accrued interest and/or principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured until paid in full or, if the restructured debt is at a market rate (a rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a six month period.

Real Estate Owned

Real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated selling costs, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in the economic conditions. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

Bank-owned life insurance is accounted for using the cash surrender value method and is recorded at its realizable value adjusted for other charges or amounts due that are probable at settlement.  The change in the cash surrender value, as well as insurance proceeds are included in other noninterest income.

65

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock

The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLB"), is required to hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB in an amount based on the Bank's total investment in mortgage related assets and advances.  The requirement pertaining to mortgage related assets is a range from 0.10% to 0.25% of mortgage related assets, and is currently equal to 0.20%. The requirement pertaining to advances is a range from 4.0% to 5.0% of total advances, and is currently equal to 4.5%.  The stock is carried at cost.  In performing our other-than-temporary impairment analysis of FHLB stock, we evaluated, among other things, (i) its earnings performance, including the significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the regulatory capital amount of the FHLB, (ii) the commitment by the FHLB to make required dividend payments, and (iii) the liquidity position of the FHLB.  We do not consider this security to be impaired at June 30, 2018.  Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net

The Company accounted for investments in joint ventures under the equity method. The balance reflected the cost basis of investments, plus the Company's share of income earned on the joint venture operations, less cash distributions, including excess cash distributions, and the Company's share of losses on joint venture operations. Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment in a joint venture was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities.

Real Estate Held for Investment

Real estate held for investment included the Company's undivided interest in real estate properties accounted for under the equity method and properties held for investment purposes. Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment for an undivided interest in real estate property was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities. The operations of the properties held for investment purposes were reflected in the financial results of the Company and included in the Other Income caption in the Income Statement. Properties held for investment purposes were carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.

Office Properties and Equipment

Land is carried as cost.  Office properties and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation of office properties and equipment is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.  The Company uses the following estimated useful lives for its office properties and equipment categories: land improvements – 15 years; building and major building improvements – 40 years; minor building improvements – 10 years and furniture and fixtures – 3 to 7 years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the remaining life of the lease or the useful life of the improvement.  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

Employee Benefit Plans

The Bank has a defined benefit pension plan which covered all employees who satisfied the eligibility requirements.  The Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2008.  The defined benefit pension plan is a multi-employer plan.  Costs of the pension plan are based on the contribution required to be made to the program.  The Bank's policy is to fund at least the minimum contribution required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

The Bank has a 401(k) savings incentive plan covering substantially all employees of the Bank. The Bank may match a percentage of the first 6% of employee contributions. The contribution percentage is determined annually by the Board of Directors.

The employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP") is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans."  The funds borrowed by the ESOP from the Company to purchase the Company's common stock will be repaid from the Bank's contributions over a period of up to 25 years.  The Company's common stock not yet allocated to participants is recorded as a reduction of stockholders' equity at cost.  Compensation expense for the ESOP is based on the market price of the Company's stock and is recognized as shares are committed to be released to participants.  Dividends on allocated shares reduce retained earnings; dividends on unallocated ESOP shares reduce debt and accrued interest.

The Bank provides several nonqualified, defined benefit plans which provide benefits to executive officers and directors of the Company. These plans are unfunded and the costs of the plans are recognized over the period that services are provided.

The Company provides several post-retirement benefit plans to directors and certain retired employees and will provide such benefits to certain active officers that are accounted for in accordance with ASC 715, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits". This guidance requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial condition the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation; (b) measure a plan's assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the date of its year-end balance sheet and (c) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits that arise during the period. The Company accrues the cost of post-retirement benefit plans during the employee's period of active service.

66

The Company's equity incentive plan is accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation".  This guidance requires companies to recognize in the statement of earnings the grant-date fair value of stock based awards issued to employees.  Compensation cost related to stock based awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.  In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"), an amendment to ASC 718.  The update simplifies certain aspects of accounting for share-based payments.  The amendments include the following:

• Excess tax benefits and deficiencies resulting from exercise or vesting of stock awards are recorded as income tax expense or benefit on the income statement.  Previously, excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies were recorded in additional paid-in capital.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• For diluted earnings per share calculations, excess tax benefits are no longer included in assumed proceeds when determining average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method, resulting in changes to average diluted shares outstanding.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• Excess tax benefits or deficiencies are included as income tax expense as discrete items in the period in which they occur, which impact the effective tax rate in each reporting period; however, these discrete items are not included in the projected annual effective tax rate calculation.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• Excess tax benefits are presented as cash flows from operating activities.  Previously, excess tax benefits were included as a cash inflow from financing activities.  This update may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively upon adoption.  This update was applied retrospectively upon adoption.

• Cash paid by an employer to taxing authorities when withholding shares for tax withholding purposes is presented as cash outflows from financing activities.  Previously, there was no specific guidance on cash flow presentation, and these outflows were presented within cash flows from operating activities.  This update is required to be applied retrospectively upon adoption.

• An accounting policy election, at the entity level using a modified retrospective transition method, to account for forfeitures as they occur or estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited, as is currently required.  The Company elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.

The update was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  Any adjustments from the update was required to be applied as of the beginning of the year of adoption.  The Company adopted the update during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, and retroactively applied the guidance effective as of July 1, 2015.  The update under ASC 718 resulted in a cumulative effect debit adjustment of $33,000 to retained earnings as of July 1, 2015.  The most significant impact of the amended guidance resulted in recognition of excess tax benefits within income tax expense, which resulted in an increase to net income and earnings per share.  In addition, this guidance increases average diluted shares, since the Company no longer includes such excess tax benefits in the calculation of diluted shares.  Certain amounts or ratios presented for 2016 interim periods were restated to reflect the adoption of the new guidance.  Adoption of the update did not affect the  Company or Bank's total equity, book value per share, or regulatory capital ratios.

Income Taxes

The Company records income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, "Income Taxes," using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Where applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period of enactment. The valuation allowance is adjusted, by a charge or credit to income tax expense, as changes in facts and circumstances warrant. Income taxes are allocated to the individual entities within the consolidated group based on the effective tax rate of the entity.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.  As part of its asset/liability management strategies, the Company  uses interest rate swaps to hedge variability in future cash flows caused by changes in interest rates and accounts for these swaps as cash flow hedges.  Interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or liability at fair value. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income or loss and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged forecasted transactions affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. We formally document our risk management objectives, strategy, and the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged items. We evaluate the effectiveness of the hedge relationship, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction.  Derivatives not designated as hedges do not meet the hedge accounting requirements under U.S. GAAP.  Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings.

67

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of  net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes items recorded directly to equity, such as unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, change in actuarial gains and losses on other post retirement benefits, unrealized gains and losses on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships, and change in service cost on other postretirement benefits, net of taxes. Comprehensive income and its components is presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for all periods presented. See Note 22 for additional disclosures.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share, or EPS, is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.  The weighted average common shares outstanding include the average number of shares of common stock outstanding and allocated or committed to be released Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares.

Diluted earnings per share is computed using the same method as basic earnings per share, but reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock were exercised and converted into common stock.  These potentially dilutive shares would then be included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period using the treasury stock method.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  The update amended the diluted earnings per share calculation in that excess tax benefits are no longer included in assumed proceeds when determining average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method.  This guidance is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.  For further discussion, see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Employee Benefit Plans".

When applying the treasury stock method for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we add the assumed proceeds from option exercises and the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options.  We then divide this sum by our average stock price to calculate shares repurchased.  The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted EPS.  For the years ended June 30, 2016, we added: (1) the assumed proceeds from option exercises; (2) the tax benefit that would have been credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of restricted stock; and (3) the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options.  We then divided this sum by our average stock price to calculate shares repurchased.  The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted EPS.

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the consolidated statement of condition date of June 30, 2018, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.  The evaluation was conducted through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Reclassifications

Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform with the current period's reporting format.

68

(2) Stock Repurchase Program

On March 4, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a fourth stock repurchase plan pursuant to which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to 5% of the outstanding shares, or 2,205,451 shares.  As of June 30, 2018, a total of 13,277,681 shares were acquired under repurchase programs at a weighted average cost of $13.30 per share. The timing of the repurchases depend on certain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the Company's liquidity and capital requirements, and alternative uses of capital. Repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes.  The Company may also conduct repurchases through a Rule 10b5-1trading plan. At June 30, 2018, there are 1,888,851 shares yet to be purchased under the current repurchase plan.

(3) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks and federal funds sold and short term investments which are generally sold for one-day periods. There are no restrictions on the Company's cash and cash equivalents.

(4) Loans

A comparative summary of loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	June 30, 2018		June 30, 2017
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	267,771	$	253,310
Residential commercial real estate		2,005,315		1,945,297
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		497,708		535,567
Other commercial real estate		796,589		866,826
Construction and land loans		10,960		4,210
Total loans		3,578,343		3,605,210
Less:
Deferred loan fees, net		6,878		8,235
Allowance for loan losses		30,562		30,272
Net loans	$	3,540,903	$	3,566,703

At June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had fixed-rate mortgage commitments of $32.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and variable-rate mortgage commitments of $25.7 million and $65.5 million, respectively, which are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The rate range of the fixed rate commitments at June 30, 2018 was 3.75% to 5.50%. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. There is no exposure to credit loss in the event the other party does not exercise its right to borrow under the commitment.

Our residential lending area generally encompasses northern New Jersey.  Our market area for commercial lending, including residential CRE, is broader, generally including the state of New Jersey, eastern Pennsylvania, southern New York, New York City, Long Island, and Delaware.  Our consumer lending is generally limited to the bank's designated lending area which is considerably closer to our branch offices.

Borrowers' abilities to repay their obligations are dependent upon various factors, including the borrowers' income and net worth, cash flows generated by the underlying collateral, value of the underlying collateral and priority of the Company's lien on the property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances beyond the Company's control; the Company is therefore subject to risk of loss. The Company believes that its lending policies and procedures adequately minimize the potential exposure to such risks and that adequate provisions for losses are provided for all known and inherent risks.

Collateral and/or guarantees are generally required for all loans. In underwriting a loan secured by real property, we require an appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser approved by the Company's board of directors. The appraisal is subject to review by an independent third party hired by the Company. Generally, management obtains updated appraisals when a loan is deemed impaired. These appraisals may be more limited than those prepared for the underwriting of a new loan. In addition, when the Company acquires other real estate owned, it generally obtains a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying value of the asset.

69

The aggregate amount of loans to our executive officers, directors and their related entities was $21.5 million and $22.1 million  at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  We had $305,000 in new loans in 2018. New loans to executive officers, directors and their related entities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 totaled $2.3 million. Repayments from executive officers, directors and their related entities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, totaled $864,000 and $13.6 million, respectively.  These loans were performing according to their original terms at June 30, 2018.

(5) Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover probable and reasonably estimable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses that is charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, we make significant estimates and, therefore, have identified the allowance as a critical accounting policy. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount of the allowance required. We believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover specifically identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.  The analysis of the allowance for loan losses has two components: specific and general allocations.  Loan risk ratings are an important part of the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.  The Credit department classifies all loans within the following categories: Superior, Desirable, Pass, Low Pass, Watch, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss.  The Company utilizes the services of a third party loan review firm to evaluate the loan ratings assigned by the Credit department and related file maintenance items.  Reviews are performed quarterly and, on an annual basis, the third party firm reviews an aggregate of approximately 65% of the commercial real estate portfolios, including a sampling of both new and seasoned loans, a review of all "Regulation O" loans, construction loans with balances of $250,000 or more, and review of all criticized or classified CRE loans with balances of $250,000 or more.  Their scope is determined by the Audit Committee.  The firm prepares quarterly reports that include a rating for all loans reviewed over the period.  There is typically a very high degree of correlation between the loan ratings assigned by the Credit department and the loan ratings determined by the third party loan review firm.

Specific allocations are made for loans that are impaired. Management will identify loans that have demonstrated issues that cause concern regarding full collectibility in the required time frame and classified certain loans with such characteristics as impaired. Delinquency and internal credit department reviews are key indicators of such issues. In general, loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings and loans that are greater than $1.0 million and delinquent more than 90 days are considered impaired.  Impaired values are determined by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses.  Specific reserves are calculated by subtracting the impaired value of a loan from the book value of the loan.  No reserve is necessary if the impaired value exceeds the book value.  Impaired loans are included within the Substandard classification.

The Superior, Desirable, Pass, Low Pass and Watch ratings are all considered to be "Pass" classification loans.  A general reserve is determined for such loans by segregating the Pass classification loans by segment. The following issues are evaluated and general reserve factors are calculated for each loan segment for each issue:

•Historical charge-offs,

•Lending policy and procedures,

•Economic and business conditions,

•Nature and volume of portfolio,

•Lending staff,

•Volume and severity of delinquent loans,

•Loan review system,

•Collateral values, and

•Concentrations of credit.

In the process of determining appropriate reserve factors regarding historical charge-offs, both a look back period and loss emergence periods were utilized.  The look back period is the time frame used to measure historical charge-offs.  The look back period utilized by the Company was eight years.  The loss emergence period represents the estimated average time between when a loss event occurs and when such loss is specifically reserved or charged off by the Company.  The loss emergence period utilized by the Company varied by loan segment, and ranged from 12 to 33 months.

70

The general reserve factors are totaled for each loan segment and applied to the appropriate period end balance.  This process determines the general reserve for the Pass classification loans.  The non-impaired loans that are rated Special Mention, Substandard or Doubtful are determined and a general reserve percentage is then applied to all such loans.  The sum of the general reserves for the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful loans plus the general reserves for the Pass classification loans equals the total general reserves at period end.

On a quarterly basis, the Chief Financial Officer:

• Reviews all impaired loans individually, determines the appropriate impaired loan balance and calculates any necessary specific reserves. The most current appraised value is generally used as the basis for the value of the collateral.

• Summarizes by rating classification all remaining loans that are graded either "Special Mention," "Substandard" or "Doubtful," determines the appropriate general reserve percentage and calculates the necessary general reserve. The reserve percentage utilized is increased as the classification severity increases.

• Reviews and updates, as necessary, the general reserves appropriate for Pass classification loans, by segment.  The appropriate general reserve factor is then applied to the balance in each loan segment and the necessary general reserve is calculated.

The results are summarized and an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses is determined. This level is compared to the "pre-analysis" level of allowance for loan losses and, if necessary, an adjustment is made through the provision for loan losses in order to reflect the appropriate level of allowance for loan losses.

The results of this quarterly process are summarized and processed accordingly. All supporting documentation is maintained by the Chief Financial Officer. A summary of loan loss allowances is presented to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis for approval.

This evaluation of the allowance for loan losses is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we have established, which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

We have a concentration of loans secured by real property located in our lending area. Our residential lending area generally encompasses northern New Jersey. Our market area for commercial lending, including residential CRE, is broader, generally including the state of New Jersey, eastern Pennsylvania, southern New York, New York City, Long Island, and Delaware. As a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in determining the value of properties. In order to reduce the potential for undue influence on the appraisal process, we use an external appraisal firm as our Appraisal Manager. The Appraisal Manager generally does not perform any appraisals but obtains quotes for necessary appraisal work from one of our approved, qualified appraisal firms.  The Appraisal Manager, in concert with our credit department, determines the firm to be utilized and orders the work. Completed appraisals are sent to the Appraisal Manager. The Appraisal Manager then reviews the appraisal addressing all key assumptions utilized in the appraisal. The completed appraisal and the written review are then forwarded to the Chief Credit Officer. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks are increases in interest rates, a decline in the economy generally, and a decline in real estate market values in our lending area. Any one or combination of these events may adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, loan losses and future levels of loan loss provisions. We consider it important to maintain the ratio of our allowance for loan losses to total loans at an adequate level. Factors such as current economic conditions, interest rates, and the composition of the loan portfolio will affect our determination of the level of this ratio for any particular period.

Our allowance for loan losses in recent years reflects probable incurred losses resulting from the actual growth in our loan portfolio, ongoing local and regional economic conditions and our overall levels of charge-offs, delinquencies, impaired loans and nonaccrual loans. We believe the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2018 adequately reflects our portfolio credit risk, given our emphasis on commercial real estate lending and current market conditions.

Although we believe we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, adjustments may be necessary if future economic and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment.  Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. In addition, the FDIC and the NJDOBI, as an integral part of their examination process, will periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. The most recent such examination was performed by the NJDOBI as of March 31, 2017.

71

Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	30,272		$	29,951		$	30,889
Provisions charged to operations		—			—			—
Recoveries		407			409			9
Loans charged off		(117	)		(88	)		(947	)
Balance at end of year	$	30,562		$	30,272		$	29,951

The following tables provide the twelve month activity in the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.

	Year ended June 30, 2018
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,261		$	15,794	$	3,000	$	10,017		$	200	$	30,272
Charge-offs		(117	)		—		—		—			—		(117	)
Recoveries		150			—		—		225			32		407
Provisions		696			1,465		15		(2,414	)		238		—
Ending balance	$	1,990		$	17,259	$	3,015	$	7,828		$	470	$	30,562

	Year ended June 30, 2017
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate			Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,300		$	12,837	$	3,646		$	11,850		$	318		$	29,951
Charge-offs		(75	)		—		—			(13	)		—			(88	)
Recoveries		—			—		—			409			—			409
Provisions		36			2,957		(646	)		(2,229	)		(118	)		—
Ending balance	$	1,261		$	15,794	$	3,000		$	10,017		$	200		$	30,272

	Year ended June 30, 2016
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate			Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,521		$	10,814	$	4,042		$	13,943		$	569		$	30,889
Charge-offs		(98	)		—		—			(849	)		—			(947	)
Recoveries		—			—		—			9			—			9
Provisions		(123	)		2,023		(396	)		(1,253	)		(251	)		—
Ending balance	$	1,300		$	12,837	$	3,646		$	11,850		$	318		$	29,951

72

The following table details the amount of loans receivables that are evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and the related portion of allowance for loan loss that is allocated to each loan portfolio segment at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

	At June 30, 2018
	Residential		Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate		Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,990		17,259		3,015		7,828		470		30,562
Total	$	1,990	$	17,259	$	3,015	$	7,828	$	470	$	30,562
Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,022	$	—	$	—	$	4,181	$	—	$	9,203
Collectively evaluated for impairment		262,749		2,005,315		497,708		792,408		10,960		3,569,140
Total	$	267,771	$	2,005,315	$	497,708	$	796,589	$	10,960	$	3,578,343

	June 30, 2017
	Residential		Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate		Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	43	$	—	$	43
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,261		15,794		3,000		9,974		200		30,229
Total	$	1,261	$	15,794	$	3,000	$	10,017	$	200	$	30,272
Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,684	$	—	$	—	$	10,173	$	—	$	13,857
Collectively evaluated for impairment		249,626		1,945,297		535,567		856,653		4,210		3,591,353
Total	$	253,310	$	1,945,297	$	535,567	$	866,826	$	4,210	$	3,605,210

73

The Company continuously monitors the credit quality of its loans receivable.  In addition to internal staff, the Company utilizes the services of a third party loan review firm to review management's ratings on a selection of loans.  Credit quality is monitored by reviewing certain credit quality indicators.  Assets classified as "Satisfactory" are deemed to possess average to superior credit quality, requiring no more than normal attention.  Assets classified as "Pass/Watch" have generally acceptable asset quality yet possess higher risk characteristics/circumstances than satisfactory assets. Such characteristics include strained liquidity, slow pay, stale financial statements or other circumstances requiring greater attention from bank staff.  We classify an asset as "Special Mention" if the asset has a potential weakness that warrants management's close attention.  Such weaknesses, if left uncorrected may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects of the asset.  An asset is considered "Substandard" if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.  Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.  Assets classified as "Doubtful" have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Included in the Substandard caption are all loans that were past due 90 days (or more) and all impaired loans.

The following table provides information about the loan credit quality at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Credit Quality Indicators at June 30, 2018
	Satisfactory		Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	242,534	$	18,731	$	171	$	6,335	$	—	$	267,771
Residential commercial real estate		1,981,781		21,952		1,582		—		—		2,005,315
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		494,723		—		2,985		—		—		497,708
Other commercial real estate		688,725		92,430		10,164		5,270		—		796,589
Construction and land loans		10,960		—		—		—		—		10,960
Total	$	3,418,723	$	133,113	$	14,902	$	11,605	$	—	$	3,578,343

	Credit Quality Indicators at June 30, 2017
	Satisfactory		Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	229,481	$	17,256	$	1,571	$	5,002	$	—	$	253,310
Residential commercial real estate		1,915,526		27,778		1,753		240		—		1,945,297
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		532,472		—		3,095		—		—		535,567
Other commercial real estate		725,714		107,249		15,551		18,312		—		866,826
Construction and land loans		4,210		—		—		—		—		4,210
Total	$	3,407,403	$	152,283	$	21,970	$	23,554	$	—	$	3,605,210

Included in loans are loans for which the accrual of interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrowers. The principal amount of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $7.9 million, $10.2 million and $10.0 million, respectively. If the nonaccrual loans had performed in accordance with their original terms, interest income would have increased by $198,000 and $283,000 and $555,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016 respectively. The Company has no loans past due 90 days or more that are still accruing interest.

74

The following table summarizes the delinquency and accrual status of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	At June 30, 2018
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual (1)
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	2,696	$	753	$	5,213	$	8,662	$	259,109	$	267,771	$	6,335
Residential commercial real estate		1,582		—		—		1,582		2,003,733		2,005,315		—
Grocery/credit retail CRE		—		—		—		—		497,708		497,708		—
Other commercial real estate		1,009		—		136		1,145		795,444		796,589		1,542
Construction and land loans		—		—		—		—		10,960		10,960		—
Total	$	5,287	$	753	$	5,349	$	11,389	$	3,566,954	$	3,578,343	$	7,877

	At June 30, 2017
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual (2)
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	1,243	$	1,776	$	614	$	3,633	$	249,677	$	253,310	$	1,556
Residential commercial real estate		240		—		—		240		1,945,057		1,945,297		—
Grocery/credit retail CRE		—		—		—		—		535,567		535,567		—
Other commercial real estate		606		—		1,897		2,503		864,323		866,826		8,667
Construction and land loans		—		—		—		—		4,210		4,210		—
Total	$	2,089	$	1,776	$	2,511	$	6,376	$	3,598,834	$	3,605,210	$	10,223

(1) Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2018 are residential loans totaling $35,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $582,000  that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $504,000 and other CRE loans totaling $1.4 million that were less than 30 days past due.

(2) Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2017 are residential loans totaling $716,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $205,000 that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $21,000 and other CRE loans totaling $6.8 million that were less than 30 days past due.

Impaired loans at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $9.2 million, $13.9 million and $13.2 million respectively.  There were no impaired loans with an allocation in the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2018. The allocation in the allowance for loan losses for impaired loans at 2017 and 2016 were $43,000 on balances of $538,000 and $118,000 on balances of $487,000, respectively. Impaired loans with no related allowance at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $9.2 million, $13.3 million and $12.7 million, respectively. The average balance of impaired loans was $8.9 million, $13.1 million and $13.4 million during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest income recognized on these loans for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $450,000, $706,000 and $409,000, respectively.

75

The following table provides information about the Company's impaired loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Impaired Financing Receivables
	At June 30, 2018									Year ended June 30, 2018
	Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance			Allowance			Average Recorded Investment			Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential		$	5,021		$	5,022		$	—		$	4,614		$	64
Other commercial real estate			4,018			4,181			—			4,317			386
			9,039			9,203			—			8,931			450
Total:
Residential		$	5,021		$	5,022		$	—		$	4,614		$	64
Other commercial real estate			4,018			4,181			—			4,317			386
		$	9,039		$	9,203		$	—		$	8,931		$	450
Cash basis interest income															415

	Impaired Financing Receivables
	At June 30, 2017						Year ended June 30, 2017
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential	$	3,684	$	3,684	$	—	$	3,655	$	146
Other commercial real estate		9,635		9,635		—		8,848		560
		13,319		13,319		—		12,503		706
With an allowance recorded:
Other commercial real estate	$	495	$	538	$	43	$	554	$	—
		495		538		43		554		—
Total:
Residential	$	3,684	$	3,684	$	—	$	3,655	$	146
Other commercial real estate		10,130		10,173		43		9,402		560
	$	13,814	$	13,857	$	43	$	13,057	$	706
Cash basis interest income										611

Troubled debt restructured loans ("TDRs") are those loans whose terms have been modified because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. The Company has selectively modified certain borrower's loans to enable the borrower to emerge from delinquency and keep their loans current. The eligibility of a borrower for a TDR modification depends upon the facts and circumstances of each transaction, which may change from period to period, and involve judgment by management regarding the likelihood that the modification will result in the maximum recovery by the Company. Modifications could include extension of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and forgiveness of accrued interest and/or principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured until paid in full or, if the obligation yields a market rate (a rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a six month period. Management classifies all TDRs as impaired loans. Included in impaired loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are $1.9 million and $4.6 million, respectively, of loans which are deemed TDRs.

76

The following table presents additional information regarding the Company's TDRs as of June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Troubled Debt Restructurings at June 30, 2018
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	—	$	174	$	174
Other commercial real estate		309		1,407		1,716
Total	$	309	$	1,581	$	1,890
Allowance	$	—	$	—	$	—
	Troubled Debt Restructurings at June 30, 2017
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	—	$	178	$	178
Other commercial real estate		362		4,070		4,432
Total	$	362	$	4,248	$	4,610
Allowance	$	—	$	43	$	43

The following tables summarize loans that were modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.  The pre-modification and post-modification outstanding recorded investments disclosed in the table below represent the loan carrying amounts immediately prior to the modification and the carrying amounts at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

	Year ended June 30, 2018
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	1	$	271	$	249
Total	$	1	$	271	$	249

	Year ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	2	$	1,252	$	1,167
Total	$	2	$	1,252	$	1,167

	Year Ended June 30, 2016
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	1	$	3,385	$	2,266
Total	$	1	$	3,385	$	2,266

The relationship modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, was restructured from interest only to a principal and interest amortizing loan through maturity in conjunction with a principal paydown from the borrower. Of the relationships modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, one relationship was modified to provide interest only payments through maturity and the other relationship was granted a reduced rate. The relationship modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2016 was granted an extended maturity in conjunction with a principal paydown from the borrower.

The identification of troubled debt restructured loans did not have a significant impact on the allowance for loan losses. In addition, there were no charge-offs as a result of the classication of these loans as troubled debt restructuring during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. There were no payment defaults on loans modified as troubled debt restructurings within twelve months of modification during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

77

(6) Securities Held to Maturity

The following is a comparative summary of securities held to maturity at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

			June 30, 2018
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
Due in less than one year	$	1,750	$	—	$	23	$	1,727
Due in one to five years		5,000		—		94		4,906
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		220,057		23		5,965		214,115
Commercial MBS		13,035		—		421		12,614
CMO		85,488		35		2,398		83,125
Corporate Note
Due in five to ten years		10,044		—		20		10,024
	$	335,374	$	58	$	8,921	$	326,511

			June 30, 2017
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
Due in one to five years	$	6,750	$	—	$	54	$	6,696
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		141,990		81		1,391		140,680
Commercial MBS		13,473		112		83		13,502
CMO		77,418		—		1,092		76,326
	$	239,631	$	193	$	2,620	$	237,204

The contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity generally exceed 20 years; however, the effective lives are expected to be shorter due to anticipated prepayments and, in the case of CMOs, cash flow priorities.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.

The Company did not sell any securities held to maturity during the year ended 2018. Proceeds from the sale of  securities held to maturity for the year ended June 30, 2017 were $2.0 million on securities with an amortized cost of $1.9 million, resulting in gross gains of $57,000. There were no gross losses for the year ended June 30, 2017.  The Company did not sell any securities held to maturity during the year ended June 30, 2016. The held to maturity securities sold had less than 15% of their original par remaining at the time of the sale. The Company did not record other than temporary impairment charges on securities held to maturity during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Securities with fair values of $9.1 million and $27.2 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were pledged as collateral for advances. There were no fair value of securities held to maturity pledged as collateral for cash flow hedge interest rate swaps at June 30, 2018. The fair value of securities held to maturity pledged as collateral for cash flow hedge interest rate swaps totaled $8.5 million at June 30, 2017. There were no held to maturity securities pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2018, as the company arranged for a municipal deposit letter of credit from the FHLBNY to collateralize our municipal deposits in the amount of $217.0 million. Held to maturity securities with fair values of $132.5 million were pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2017.

Gross unrealized losses on securities held to maturity and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	June 30, 2018
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value			Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations		$	—	$	—	$	6,633	$	117	$	6,633	$	117
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			188,281		4,646		24,712		1,319		212,993		5,965
Commercial MBS			8,290		224		4,324		197		12,614		421
CMO			9,106		279		48,211		2,119		57,317		2,398
Corporate Note			10,024		20		—		—		10,024		20
		$	215,701	$	5,169	$	83,880	$	3,752	$	299,581	$	8,921

78

	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value			Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations		$	1,737	$	13	$	4,959	$	41	$	6,696	$	54
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			128,040		1,265		3,020		126		131,060		1,391
Commercial MBS			7,120		83		—		—		7,120		83
CMO			76,326		1,092		—		—		76,326		1,092
		$	213,223	$	2,453	$	7,979	$	167	$	221,202	$	2,620

Management evaluated the securities in the above tables and concluded that none of the securities with losses has impairments that are other-than-temporary. The unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate changes and market conditions. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has no intent to sell and believes it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

(7) Securities Available for Sale

The following is a comparative summary of securities available for sale at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

	June 30, 2018
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	601	$	964	$	—	$	1,565
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		70		1		—		71
Commercial MBS		4,074		63		—		4,137
CMO		40,106		—		1,188		38,918
	$	44,851	$	1,028	$	1,188	$	44,691

	June 30, 2017
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	601	$	897	$	—	$	1,498
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		6,974		9		62		6,921
Commercial MBS		4,220		186		—		4,406
CMO		85,437		152		484		85,105
	$	97,232	$	1,244	$	546	$	97,930

The contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities available for sale generally exceed 20 years; however, the effective lives are expected to be shorter due to anticipated prepayments and, in the case of CMOs, cash flow priorities. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.

Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale for the year June 30, 2018 were $29.5 million on securities with an amortized cost of $29.8 million, resulting in gross losses of $324,000. Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale for the year June 30, 2017 were $55.1 million on securities with an amortized cost of $56.0 million, resulting in gross gains and gross losses of $28,000 and $911,000, respectively.  Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale for the year June 30, 2016 were $100.5 million on securities with an amortized cost of $99.5 million, resulting in gross gains and gross losses of $993,000 and $3,000, respectively. There were no impairment charges on available for sale securities for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.  The Equity securities caption relates to holdings of shares in financial institutions common stock.  Available for sale securities with fair values of $15.5 million and $31.6 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were pledged as collateral for advances.  There were no securities available for sale pledged as collateral for cash flow hedge interest rate swaps at June 30, 2018 and 2017. There were no available for sale securities pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2018, as the Company arranged for a municipal deposit letter of credit from the FHLBNY  to collateralize our municipal deposits  in the amount of $217.0 million. Available for sale securities with fair values of $59.5 million were pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2017.

79

Gross unrealized losses on securities available for sale and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 were as follows:

	June 30, 2018
	Less than 12 months				Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities:
CMO	$	20,651	$	444	$	18,267	$	744	$	38,918	$	1,188
	$	20,651	$	444	$	18,267	$	744	$	38,918	$	1,188

	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 months				Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		6,521		62		—		—		6,521		62
CMO		53,880		406		4,877		78		58,757		484
	$	60,401	$	468	$	4,877	$	78	$	65,278	$	546

Management evaluated the securities in the above tables and concluded that none of the securities with losses has impairments that are other-than-temporary. The unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate changes and market conditions. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has no intent to sell and believes it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

80

(8) Accrued Interest Receivable

A summary of accrued interest receivable at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Mortgage Loans	$	10,446	$	9,976
Investment Securities		815		644
	$	11,261	$	10,620

(9) Office Properties and Equipment

At June 30, 2018 and 2017, office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, consist of the following:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cost:
Land	$	4,171	$	4,171
Buildings		10,073		10,073
Land and building improvements		5,698		5,470
Leasehold improvements		1,763		1,754
Furniture and equipment		6,282		6,451
Construction in progress		50		248
		28,037		28,167
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		14,582		14,258
Office properties and equipment, net	$	13,455	$	13,909

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $810,000, $864,000 and $910,000, respectively.

At June 30, 2018, the Company and the Bank conducted business from its corporate headquarters in Washington Township, New Jersey, its lending offices in New York City and Cherry Hill, New Jersey and 25 full service branch offices located in Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic counties, New Jersey.

81

(10) Deposits

Deposits include checking (non-interest and interest-bearing demand deposits), money market, savings and time deposits. At June 30, 2018 and 2017, we had brokered deposits totaling $450.4 million and $510.4 million, respectively. We had no brokered time deposits at June 30, 2018. At  June 30, 2017, brokered deposits include brokered time deposits totaling $38.9 million having weighted average interest rate of 1.34%.  The brokered time deposits had weighted average maturity of 0.1 years at June 30, 2017.

Deposit balances are summarized as follows:

	2018					2017
	Amount		Weighted average cost			Amount		Weighted average cost
	(Dollars in thousands)
Checking accounts	$	751,735		0.85	%	$	706,554		0.62	%
Money market deposit accounts		763,003		1.13	%		847,888		1.05	%
Savings accounts		188,859		0.28	%		177,896		0.23	%
Time deposits		1,211,531		1.62	%		1,124,140		1.34	%
	$	2,915,128		1.21	%	$	2,856,478		1.01	%

Interest expense on deposits for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows:

	2018		2017		2016
	(In thousands)
Checking accounts	$	4,955	$	3,015	$	1,666
Money market deposit accounts		9,038		7,742		5,034
Savings accounts		455		391		380
Time deposits		17,176		13,523		10,804
	$	31,624	$	24,671	$	17,884

Time deposits at June 30, 2018 mature as follows (in thousands):

Year ending June 30:
2019	$	781,699
2020		280,465
2021		69,340
2022		66,912
2023 and beyond		13,115
	$	1,211,531

Included in time deposits at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is $244.7 million and $221.8 million, respectively, of deposits of $250,000 and over.

82

(11) Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 consists of the following:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	18,153		$	24,641		$	24,145
State		4,200			2,723			4,160
Total current		22,353			27,364			28,305
Deferred:
Federal		11,061			(776	)		765
State		(2,298	)		(206	)		(536	)
Total deferred		8,763			(982	)		229
Total income tax expense	$	31,116		$	26,382		$	28,534

A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected amount (computed by multiplying income before provision for income taxes times the applicable statutory federal income tax rate) for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Income before provision for income taxes	$	74,010		$	75,526		$	80,829
Applicable statutory federal income tax rate		28	%		35	%		35	%
Computed "expected" federal income tax expense		20,723			26,434			28,290
Increase (decrease) in federal income tax expense resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		2,339			1,636			2,356
Bank owned life insurance		(698	)		(916	)		(951	)
ESOP fair market value adjustment		484			723			733
ESOP unallocated dividend		(631	)		(455	)		(403	)
Non-deductible compensation		—			146			194
Stock based compensation		(1,122	)		(1,430	)		(2,118	)
Impact of tax reform		10,165			—			—
Other items, net		(144	)		244			433
Total income tax expense	$	31,116		$	26,382		$	28,534

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act").  Among numerous provisions included in the Act was the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Because the Company has a fiscal year end of June 30, the reduced corporate tax rate will result in the application of a blended federal statutory tax rate of 28% for its fiscal year 2018. Applying the blended statutory tax rate to the results for the September 30, 2017 quarterly period resulted in a $1.3 million reduction being recognized in the December 31, 2017 quarterly period.

While the Act will lower the Company's future tax rate, in accordance with ASC 740 companies are required to re-measure deferred tax balances using the new enacted tax rates to account for the future impact of lower corporate tax rates on these deferred amounts.  The Company re-measured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future. The tax expense recorded in the December 31, 2017 quarterly period relating to the remeasurement of the Company's deferred tax balances is $10.2 million. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Act and refining calculations, which could potentially affect the re-measurement of these balances.  The future impact of the Act may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, assumptions made, the issuance of additional guidance, and actions we may take as a result of the Act.

The effective tax rates for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were 42.04%, 34.93% and 35.30%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2018 was elevated due to adjustments necessitated by the Act. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  As a result of the new guidance, excess tax benefits from exercise or vesting of share-based awards are now included as a reduction in income tax expense, as discrete items, in the period in which the exercise or vesting occurs.  This impacts the effective tax rate in each reporting period; however, these discrete items are not included in the projected annual effective tax rate calculation.

83

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan and real estate owned losses	$	8,589	$	12,101
Postretirement benefits		10,242		13,973
Accrued/deferred compensation		7,554		9,598
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released		875		1,211
Stock compensation		1,914		3,772
Other than temporary loss on securities		64		96
State net operating loss carry forward		1,704		373
Other		494		271
Total deferred tax asset		31,436		41,395
Deferred tax liabilities:
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		—		301
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap		5,158		2,776
Other		414		625
Total deferred tax liabilities		5,572		3,702
Net deferred tax asset	$	25,864	$	37,693

Sources of deferred taxes for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were due primarily to the difference in recognizing income and expenses for book purposes and tax purposes for various deferred loan fees, unrealized gains and losses on financial assets, uncollected interest on loans, accrued benefit costs, and book and tax depreciation.

At June 30, 2018, there are approximately $24.0 million of state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income.  If not utilized, these carryforwards will begin to expire in 2036.  Based upon projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the net deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences and loss carryforwards and, therefore, has not established a valuation allowance.

At June 30, 2018, retained earnings includes approximately $15.1 million for which no provision for income tax has been made.  This amount represents an allocation of income to bad debt deductions for tax purposes only.  Under ASC 740, this amount is treated as a permanent difference and deferred taxes are not recognized unless it appears that it will be reduced and result in taxable income in the foreseeable future. Events that would result in taxation of these reserves include failure to qualify as a bank for tax purposes, distributions in complete or partial liquidation, stock redemptions and excess distributions to shareholders.  At June 30, 2018, the Company had an unrecognized tax liability of $4.5 million with respect to this reserve.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, where applicable, in income tax expense.  The Company did not have any material uncertain tax positions for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in New Jersey, and New York city and state jurisdictions.  The Company is no longer subject to federal and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2014. The Company's federal return for the tax year ended December 31, 2015 is currently under audit. The Company's New York state tax return for the tax years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 was audited during fiscal year 2018. The completion of the examination did not have a material impact on the Company's effective income tax rate. The accrual of these audit settlements marginally increased fiscal year 2018 tax expense and effective tax rate.

84

(12) Borrowings

As of June 30, 2018, we had total borrowings in the amount of $596.4 million with an estimated weighted average maturity of 2.4 years and a weighted average rate of 1.9%.  As of June 30, 2017, we had total borrowings in the amount of $642.1 million with an estimated weighted average maturity of 3.2 years and a weighted average rate of 1.6%. Borrowings primarily consist of advances from the FHLB and, to a lesser extent, advances from other financial institutions.  All of the borrowings at June 30, 2018 and 2017 were fixed rate, non-amortizing interest only borrowings.  The following table presents borrowings as of June 30, 2018 by stated maturity:

	Stated Maturity
Year ending June 30:
2019	$	193,735
2020		97,418
2021		99,648
2022		110,650
2023		58,426
2025		36,495
	$	596,372

At June 30, 2018, borrowings are secured by mortgage-backed securities and investment securities with a book value of $24.9 million and performing mortgage loans with an outstanding balance of $2.84 billion. The fair value of mortgage-backed securities and investment securities pledged as collateral for borrowings were $24.6 million and $58.8 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. At June 30, 2018, the Company had additional borrowing capacity of $898.9 million with the FHLB.

85

(13) Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Oritani is exposed to certain risks regarding its ongoing business operations. Derivative instruments are used to offset a portion of the Company's interest rate risk. Specifically, the Company has utilized interest rate swaps to partially offset the interest rate risk inherent in the Company's balance sheet. Oritani recognizes interest rate swaps as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial condition with an offset recorded in Other Comprehensive Income and any ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings. The interest rate swaps have been designed as cash flow hedges.

Oritani is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the agreements. Oritani controls the credit risk through monitoring procedures and does not expect the counterparty to fail their obligations. Oritani only deals with primary dealers and believes that the credit risk inherent in these contracts was not significant during and at period end. Oritani has the right to demand that the counterparty post collateral to cover any market value shortfall of the counterparty regarding the transaction.

At June 30, 2018, Oritani had entered into twenty three interest rate swap agreements with a total notional outstanding of $405.0 million. These agreements all feature exchanges of fixed for variable payments covering various hedging periods maturing between July 2, 2018 and June 26, 2025.   The Company is paying fixed rates on these swaps ranging from 0.59% to 1.90%, in exchange for receiving variable payments linked to one month LIBOR.

The following table presents information regarding our derivative financial instruments at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

		At June 30, 2018					At June 30, 2017
Balance Sheet Line Item		Notional Amount			Fair Value		Notional Amount			Fair Value
Cash flow hedge interest rate swaps
Gross unrealized gain	Other Assets	$	405,000		$	16,789	$	450,000		$	6,437
Gross notional / net fair value		$	405,000		$	16,789	$	450,000		$	6,437
Average rate paid for the year ended			1.96	%				1.26	%
Average rate received for the year ended			2.06	%				0.72	%
Weighted average maturity (in years)			3.9					5.4

The amounts recognized in interest expense related to cash flow hedge ineffectiveness were immaterial for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. There were no accumulated net after-tax losses related to effective cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2018 and 2017.  We had no securities pledged as collateral for the swaps at June 30, 2018. The fair value of securities pledged as collateral for the swaps at June 30, 2017 was $8.5 million.

86

Gains (losses) included in the consolidated statements of income and in comprehensive income, on a pre-tax basis, related to cash flow hedge interest rate swaps are as follows:

	Year ended June 30,
	2018		2017
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense	$	133	$	(2,523	)
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income		10,485		13,297
Amount of loss recognized in the consolidated statements of income		—		(7,670	)

(14) Employee Benefit Plans

The Company is a participant in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions ("Pentegra DB Plan"), a tax-qualified defined-benefit pension plan.  The Pentegra DB Plan's Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the Plan Number is 333. The Pentegra DB Plan is a multiple-employer plan. Accordingly, under the Pentegra DB Plan contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide benefits to participants of other participating employers. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place that require contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan.

The Pentegra DB Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2008. Full time employees whom attained age 21 and completed one year of service were eligible to participate in this plan. Retirement benefits are based upon a formula utilizing years of service and average compensation, as defined. Participants were vested 100% upon the completion of 5 years of service.

The funded status (fair value of the plan assets divided by funding target) as of July 1, 2017 and 2016 was 116.4% and 108.1%, respectively. The fair value of plan assets reflects any contributions received through June 30, 2017. The Company's contributions for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $500,000, $500,000 and $500,000, respectively. The Company's contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan are not more than 5% of the total contributions to the plan.

The Company has a savings incentive plan covering substantially all employees of the Company. Contributions are currently made by the Company in an amount equal to 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions. The contribution percentage is determined annually by the Board of Directors. Company contributions for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $223,000, $219,000 and $193,000, respectively.

The Company has a nonqualified savings incentive plan covering certain eligible employees whose salary deferrals to the savings incentive plan are limited. Contributions to the nonqualified savings incentive plan are currently made by the Company in an amount equal to 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions to this plan with interest calculated at the greater of 9% or the Citibank prime rate of interest. For the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, interest was calculated at 9%. Interest expenses for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $1,098,000, $974,000 and $820,000, respectively. The contribution percentage is determined annually by the Board of Directors. The deferrals and contributions are payable, with interest, at a future date. Until these payments are made, the obligations to the employees are a general liability of the Company. Company contributions for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $115,000, $135,000 and $190,000, respectively. The total obligation under the nonqualified savings incentive plan that existed as of June 30, 2018, and 2017 was $13.1 million and $11.8 million, respectively.

The Company has a nonqualified Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP Plan) which provides benefits to employees who are disallowed certain benefits under the Company's qualified benefit plans. The Company recorded expenses associated with the BEP Plan of $80,000, $91,000 and $88,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company has a nonqualified Directors' Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan). The Retirement Plan provides eligible directors an annual retirement benefit based on the monthly meeting fee at the time of the director's retirement, death, disability or a change in control. The Company recorded expenses of $338,000, $333,000 and $430,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the Retirement Plan.

During 1999, the Company adopted a Post Retirement Medical Plan (the Medical Plan) for directors and certain eligible employees. The Medical Plan provides a medical retirement benefit at a cost to the Company limited to two times the premium at the time of the participant's retirement. Participants are required to contribute to the plan for excess premiums above the limitation. The Company recorded expenses of $270,000, $641,000 and $467,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the Medical Plan.

During 2000, the Company adopted a Deferred Director's Fee Plan (the Deferred Fee Plan) for outside directors of the Company. Under the Deferred Fee Plan, directors may elect to defer the receipt of their board and committee fees. The fees are payable, with interest, at a predetermined future date. Interest is calculated at the greater of 9% or the Citibank prime rate of interest. For the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, interest was calculated at 9%. Interest expenses for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $884,000, $791,000 and $694,000, respectively. Until these payments are made, the obligations to the directors are a general liability of the Company. The total obligation under the Deferred Fee Plan that existed as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $10.4 million and $9.4 million, respectively.

87

The following table sets forth information regarding the BEP Plan, the Retirement Plan and the Medical Plan at June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands).

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan						Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of the year	$	1,386		$	1,388		$	5,858		$	5,756		$	5,567		$	6,583
Service cost		—			—			130			151			59			57
Interest cost		45			39			208			182			211			234
Actuarial (gain) loss		(25	)		(41	)		(518	)		(168	)		41			(1,273	)
Benefits paid		—			—			(90	)		(63	)		(76	)		(34	)
Discount rate change		—			—			—			—			—			—
Projected benefit obligation at end of the year	$	1,406		$	1,386		$	5,588		$	5,858		$	5,802		$	5,567
Reconciliation of plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		—			—			—			—			—			—
Employer contributions		—			—			90			63			76			34
Benefits paid		—			—			(90	)		(63	)		(76	)		(34	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of the year	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Unfunded status at end of year	$	1,406		$	1,386		$	5,588		$	5,858		$	5,802		$	5,567

The unfunded BEP of $1.4 million and $1.4 million, Retirement Plan of $5.6 million and $5.9 million and Medical Plan of $5.8 million and $5.6 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017 respectively, are included in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income related to pension and other postretirement benefits, on a pre-tax basis, at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are summarized in the following table (in thousands).

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan							Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2018				2017			2018			2017
Net actuarial loss/(gain)		$	238		$	299		$	(308	)		$	210		$	461		$	420
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income		$	238		$	299		$	(308	)		$	210		$	461		$	420

88

Net periodic benefit costs for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, as well as costs that are expected to be amortized into expense in fiscal 2019, are presented in the following table.

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan						Medical Plan
	2018		2017		2016		2018		2017		2016		2018		2017		2016
	(In thousands)
Service cost	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	130	$	151	$	174	$	59	$	57	$	77
Interest cost		45		39		48		208		182		227		211		234		235
Amortization of unrecognized:
Net loss		35		52		40		—		—		29		—		350		155
Total	$	80	$	91	$	88	$	338	$	333	$	430	$	270	$	641	$	467
Amounts expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2019:
Net loss		33						—						—
	$	33					$	—					$	—

The weighted average actuarial assumptions used in the plan determinations at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

	BEP Plan									Retirement Plan									Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016
Discount Rate		3.84	%		3.34	%		2.94	%		4.01	%		3.65	%		3.23	%		4.09	%		3.82	%		3.58	%
Rate of compensation increase		—			—			—			2.25	%		2.25	%		2.00	%		—			—			—
Medical benefits cost rate of increase		—			—			—			—			—			—			5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%

89

Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are as follows (in thousands):

	BEP Plan		Retirement Plan		Medical Plan
2019	$	110	$	303	$	173
2020		110		302		243
2021		111		300		267
2022		111		297		267
2023		111		294		265
2024-2028		558		1,807		1,424

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects on post-retirement benefits (in thousands):

	1% increase		1% decrease
Effect on total service cost and interest cost	$	318		(231	)
Effect on post retirement benefits obligation	$	987		(785	)

During 2005, the Company adopted an Executive Supplemental Retirement Income Agreement (the SERP) for the President/CEO of the Company.  The SERP provides a retirement benefit to the executive with a minimum payment period of 20 years upon his death, disability, normal retirement, early retirement or separation from service after a change in control. The SERP benefit is equal to 70% of the executive's average annual pre-retirement base salary and bonus, reduced by the benefits due to the executive through certain other benefit plans. The Company recorded expenses of $591,000, $1,219,000 and $1,492,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the SERP.  The SERP is unfunded, and an accrued liability of $11.4 million and $10.8 million was recorded for this plan as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The Company invests in bank owned life insurance ("BOLI") to help offset the cost of employee benefits. BOLI involves the purchasing of life insurance by the Company on a chosen group of employees with the Company as owner and beneficiary of the policies. BOLI is recorded at its cash surrender value and is classified as a non-interest earning asset. Increases in the carrying value, other than purchases, are recorded as non-interest income. At June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had $98.4 million and $95.9 million, respectively, in BOLI. Income earned on BOLI was $2.5 million, $2.6 million and $2.7 million for each of the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively and is exempt from federal and state income taxes as long as the policies are held until the death of the insured individuals.

The Company has a nonqualified Executive Group Life Insurance Replacement Plan ("Split-Dollar") which provides life insurance benefits to certain eligible employees upon death while employed by the Company and upon death following termination of employment due to disability, retirement or change in control. Participants in the plan are entitled to up to two times their base annual salary, as defined by the plan. The Company recorded expenses of $105,000, $104,000 and $72,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the Split-Dollar Plan. The accrued liability recorded for this plan as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $882,000 and $777,000, respectively.

90

(15) Stock Based Compensation

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

During 2006, the Company adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ESOP). The ESOP is a tax-qualified plan designed to invest primarily in the Company's common stock. The ESOP provides employees with the opportunity to receive a funded retirement benefit from the Bank, based primarily on the value of the Company's common stock. The ESOP purchased 2,384,466 shares of the Company's common stock in the Company's initial public offering at a price of $6.67  per share. In 2010, the ESOP refinanced the outstanding principal and interest balance on the original ESOP loan and purchased additional shares, in the open market, of 1,654,529 in conjunction with the Company's second step transaction at an average price of $10.36 during June 2010. The refinancing and new stock purchases were funded with a loan from the Company to the ESOP. The outstanding loan balance at June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $19.7 million and $21.4 million, respectively. The shares of Company's common stock purchased are pledged as collateral for the loan. Shares are released from the pledge for allocation to participants as loan payments are made. At June 30, 2018, shares allocated to participants were 1,957,114 since the plan inception and shares committed to be released were 168,152. Shares that are committed to be released will be allocated to participants at the end of the plan year (December 31). ESOP shares that were unallocated or not yet committed to be released totaled 1,913,728 at June 30, 2018 and had a fair value of $31.0 million. ESOP compensation expense for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $3.5 million, $4.1 million and $4.4 million, respectively, representing the fair market value of shares allocated or committed to be released during the year.

The Company has also established an ESOP restoration plan and trust, which are non-qualified plans that provide supplemental benefits to certain executives who are prevented from receiving the full benefits contemplated by the employee stock ownership plan's benefit formula. The supplemental benefits consist of payments representing shares that cannot be allocated to participants under the ESOP due to legal limitations imposed on tax-qualified plans. Compensation expense related to this plan amounts to $665,000, $547,000, and $630,000 million, for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The total obligation under the restoration plan as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $8.4 million and $8.2 million, respectively. The obligations to the executives are a general liability of the Company.

Equity Incentive Plan

The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan ("the 2007 Equity Plan") was approved by the Company's stockholders on April 22, 2008, which authorized the issuance of up to 4,172,817 shares of Company common stock pursuant to grants of incentive and non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock awards. The 2011 Equity Incentive Plan ("2011 Equity Plan") was approved by the Company's stockholders on July 26, 2011. The 2011 Equity Plan authorized the issuance of up to 5,790,849 shares of the Company's common stock pursuant to grants of stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, with no more than 1,654,528 of the shares be issued as restricted stock awards or restricted stock units. Employees and outside directors of the Company or Oritani Bank are eligible to receive awards under the Equity Plans.

On August 18, 2011, certain officers and employees of the Company were granted in aggregate 3,033,750 stock options and 1,227,100 shares of restricted stock, and non-employee directors received in aggregate 932,500 stock options and 373,000 shares of restricted stock.

We recognize stock based compensation expense based on the grant-date fair value of those awards and options over the requisite service period in accordance with ASU16-09.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  As a result of the new guidance, excess tax benefits from exercise or vesting of share-based awards are included as a reduction in income tax expense in the period in which the exercise or vesting occurs and are presented as cash flows from operating activities.  Previously, excess tax benefits were recorded in additional paid-in capital and included as a cash inflow from financing activities.  Excess tax benefits recognized as a reduction of income tax expense for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $1.1 million, $1.4 million and $2.1 million respectively.  The Company classified share-based compensation for employees and outside directors within "compensation, payroll taxes and benefits" in the consolidated statements of income to correspond with the same line item as the cash compensation paid.

Stock options are granted at an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the grant date, based on quoted market prices.  Stock options generally vest over a five-year service period and expire ten years from issuance.  The vesting of the options accelerate upon death or disability, retirement or a change in control and expire 90 days after termination of service, excluding disability or retirement. The Company recognizes compensation expense for all option grants over the awards' respective requisite service periods.  The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.  Management estimated the fair values of all option grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The volatility rate used in the estimation of fair value was based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock for the appropriate period.  Management estimated the expected life of the options using the simplified method.  The Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant provides the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option.  The Company classified share-based compensation for employees and outside directors within "compensation, payroll taxes and benefits" in the consolidated statements of income to correspond with the same line item as the cash compensation paid.

91

The fair value of the options issued during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were estimated using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following assumptions:

	2018	2017	2016
Option shares granted	70,000	20,000	20,000
Expected dividend yield	7.18%	5.35%	6.75%
Expected volatility	18.74%	20.81%	26.10%
Risk-free interest rate	2.75%	1.39%	2.03%
Expected option life	6.50	6.50	6.50

The Company recorded $41,000, $319,000 million and $2.1 million of share based compensation expense related to the options shares for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Expected future expense related to the non-vested options outstanding at June 30, 2018 is $91,000 over a weighted average period of 4.0 years.  Upon exercise of vested options, management expects to draw on treasury stock as the source of the shares.

The following is a summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for its options plan as of June 30, 2018 and changes therein during the year then ended:

	Number of Stock Options			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
Outstanding at  June 30, 2017		3,729,033		$	2.59	$	11.70		3.4
Granted		70,000			0.89		15.40		10.0
Exercised		(1,123,738	)		2.39		10.79		1.1
Forfeited		(12,000	)		1.64		15.89		7.8
Expired		(63,432	)		2.27		11.36		1.6
Outstanding at  June 30, 2018		2,599,863		$	2.64	$	12.16		3.4
Exercisable at  June 30, 2018		2,501,464		$	2.70	$	12.05		3.2

Restricted stock shares vest over a five-year service period on the anniversary date of the grant. Vesting of the restricted stock shares accelerate upon death or disability, retirement or a change in control. The product of the number of shares granted and the grant date market price of the Company's common stock determines the fair value of restricted shares under the Company's restricted stock plan. The Company recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of restricted shares on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The following is a summary of the status of the Company's restricted stock shares as of June 30, 2018 and changes therein during the year then ended:

	Number of Shares Awarded			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at June 30, 2017		35,934		$	15.60
Granted		—			—
Vested		(15,734	)		15.33
Forfeited		(6,000	)		15.89
Non-vested at June 30, 2018		14,200		$	15.78

The Company recorded $137,000, $685,000 and $3.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of share based compensation expense related to the restricted stock share.  Expected future expense related to the non-vested restricted shares at June 30, 2018 is $203,000 over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.

92

(16) Commitments and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for premises and equipment. Certain facilities are occupied under long-term operating leases which expire on various dates. Certain leases also provide for renewal options. Total rent expense was $929,000, $918,000 and $836,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Aggregate minimum lease payments for the remainder of the leases are as follows (in thousands):

Year ending June 30:
2019	$	769
2020		652
2021		521
2022		237
2023		158
Thereafter		34
	$	2,371

There were no outstanding commitments to purchase securities at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

In the normal course of business, the Company may be a party to various outstanding legal proceedings and claims.  As of the date of this report, management is aware of no legal proceedings or claims which involve the reasonable possibility that a loss to the Company may have been incurred.  Further, there have been no asserted claims that would materially affect the Company's operations or financial position should the Company be considered liable under the claim.

(17) Regulatory Capital Requirements

Deposits at the Bank are insured up to standard limits of coverage provided by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) of the FDIC. The Bank is a New Jersey state chartered savings bank and is subject to comprehensive regulation, supervision and periodic examinations by the FDIC and by the NJDOBI. The Company is regulated by the FRB.

FDIC regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital.  Under the regulations in effect at June 30, 2018, the Bank and the Company are required to maintain (a) a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total adjusted assets of 4.0%, and (b) minimum ratios of common equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0% and 8.0%, respectively.

Under its prompt corrective action regulations, the FDIC is required to take certain supervisory actions (and may take additional discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on the institution's financial statements. The regulations establish a framework for the classification of savings banks into five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is considered well capitalized if it has a leverage (Tier 1) capital ratio of at least 5.0%; a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.5% or more; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0%; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%.

On January 1, 2015, a final rule issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the other federal bank regulatory agencies became effective which revised their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other things, the rule established a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets), adopted a uniform minimum leverage capital ratio of 4%, increased the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets) and assigned a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The final rule also requires unrealized gains and losses on certain "available-for-sale" securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital unless a one-time opt-out is exercised and requires more stringent treatment of mortgage servicing assets and certain deferred tax assets. The rule limits a banking organization's capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a "capital conservation buffer" consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement is being phased in beginning January 1, 2016 and ending January 1, 2019, when the full capital conservation buffer requirement will be effective.  The capital conservation buffer for 2018 is 1.875%.

The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the FDIC about capital components, risk weightings and other factors.

Management believes that, as of June 30, 2018, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. Further, the most recent FDIC notification categorized the Bank as a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective action regulations. There have been no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's capital classification.

93

The following is a summary of the Company's actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, compared to the FRB minimum capital adequacy requirements.

	June 30, 2018
	Actual						Required
	Amount			Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)		$	548,122		14.82	%	$	166,458		4.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)			548,122		14.82			221,945		6.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)			578,685		15.64			295,926		8.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)			548,122		13.25			165,465		4.00
Capital conservation buffer			282,759		7.64			69,358		1.875

	June 30, 2017
	Actual					Required
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	555,703		15.02	%	$	166,443		4.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		555,703		15.02			221,924		6.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		585,975		15.84			295,898		8.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		555,703		13.51			164,562		4.00
Capital conservation buffer		290,077		7.84			46,234		1.250

The following is a summary of the Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, compared to the FDIC minimum capital adequacy requirements and the FDIC requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution.

	June 30, 2018
	Actual					Required					Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	470,857		12.73	%	$	166,431		4.50	%	$	240,401		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		470,857		12.73			221,908		6.00			295,878		8.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		501,419		13.56			295,878		8.00			369,847		10.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		470,857		11.38			165,438		4.00			206,797		5.00
Capital conservation buffer		205,541		5.56			69,346		1.875

	June 30, 2017
	Actual					Required					Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	521,414		14.10	%	$	166,440		4.50	%	$	240,413		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		521,414		14.10			221,919		6.00			295,893		8.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		551,686		14.92			295,893		8.00			369,866		10.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		521,414		12.68			164,533		4.00			205,666		5.00
Capital conservation buffer		255,793		6.92			46,233		1.250

94

(18) Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", on July 1, 2008. Under ASC 820, fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are described below:

Basis of Fair Value Measurement:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Price or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).

A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies and key inputs used to measure assets recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. The descriptions include an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value.

Securities

The Company records securities held to maturity at amortized cost and securities available for sale at fair value on a recurring basis. The majority of the Company's securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets. The fair values for securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized third-party pricing service. Our independent pricing service provides us with prices which are primarily categorized as Level 2, as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are generally not available for the majority of securities in our portfolio. Pricing services may employ modeling techniques in determining pricing. Inputs to these models include market spreads, dealer quotes, prepayment speeds, credit information and the instrument's terms and conditions, among other things. Management compares the pricing to a second independent pricing source for reasonableness. Equity securities are reported at Level 1 based on quoted market prices for identical securities in active markets.

FHLB of New York Stock

FHLB of New York Stock is recorded at cost (par value) and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. There is no active market for this stock and no significant observable market data is available for this instrument. The Company considers the profitability and asset quality of FHLB, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience, when determining the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The Company believes its investment in FHLB stock is recoverable at par.  It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on the stock's transferability.  The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates fair value, since this is the amount for which it could be redeemed.

Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, periodically, the Company records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements. The fair value for significant nonperforming loans and impaired loans are valued utilizing independent appraisals of the collateral securing such loans that rely upon quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience. The appraisals are adjusted downward by management (0-20% adjustment rate and 0-10% risk premium rate), as necessary, for changes in relevant valuation factors subsequent to the appraisal date and the timing of anticipated cash flows (0-8% discount rate). The Company classifies impaired loans as Level 3.

95

Fair value for loans held for investment is estimated using portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential, residential CRE, grocery/credit retail CRE, other CRE, and construction and land. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming/impaired categories. Fair value of performing loans is estimated using a discounted cash flow model that employs a discount rate that reflects the current market pricing for loans with similar characteristics and remaining maturity, adjusted by an amount for estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The rates take into account the expected yield curve. The Company classifies the fair value of loans held for investment as Level 3.

Real Estate Owned

Assets acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure are recorded at fair value less estimated liquidation costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated liquidation costs. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience, and are considered Level 3. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated liquidation costs (5-20% discount rate), is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in the economic conditions.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as checking, savings, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The fair value of term deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The Company classifies the fair value of term deposits as Level 2.

Borrowings

The carrying amount of overnight borrowings approximates the fair value. The fair value of term borrowings is calculated based on the discounted cash flow of contractual amounts due, using market rates currently available for borrowings of similar amount and remaining maturity. The Company classifies the fair value of term borrowings as Level 2.

Derivatives

The fair value of our interest rate swap was estimated using Level 2 inputs. The fair value was determined using third party prices that are based on discounted cash flow analyses using observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.

Commitments to Extend Credit and to Purchase or Sell Securities

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of commitments to purchase or sell securities is estimated based on bid quotations received from securities dealers. The fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments approximates book value.

96

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 by level within the fair value hierarchy. There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the year ended June 30, 2018.

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2018		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Equity Securities	$	1,565	$	1,565	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
Residential MBS		71		—		71		—
Commercial MBS		4,137		—		4,137		—
CMO		38,918		—		38,918		—
Total securities available for sale		44,691		1,565		43,126		—
Interest rate swap		16,789		—		16,789		—
Total assets measured on a recurring basis		61,480		1,565		59,915		—

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2017		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
Equity Securities	$	1,498	$	1,498	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
Residential MBS		6,921		—		6,921		—
Commercial MBS		4,406		—		4,406		—
CMO		85,105		—		85,105		—
Total securities available for sale		97,930		1,498		96,432		—
Interest rate swap		6,437		—		6,437		—
Total assets measured on a recurring basis		104,367		1,498		102,869		—

97

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure the fair value of certain other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or write downs of individual assets.

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 by level within the fair value hierarchy.

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2018			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans:
Other commercial real estate		$	1,056		$	—		$	—		$	1,056
Total impaired loans			1,056			—			—			1,056
Real estate owned
Other commercial real estate			1,564			—			—			1,564
Total real estate owned			1,564			—			—			1,564
Total assets measured on a nonrecurring basis		$	2,620		$	—		$	—		$	2,620

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2017			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans:
Residential		$	59		$	—		$	—		$	59
Other commercial real estate			2,907			—			—			2,907
Total impaired loans			2,966			—			—			2,966
Real estate owned
Other commercial real estate			140			—			—			140
Total real estate owned			140			—			—			140
Total assets measured on a nonrecurring basis		$	3,106		$	—		$	—		$	3,106

98

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments not recorded at fair values in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2018 and 2017.  These tables exclude financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value.  Financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value include cash and cash equivalents, FHLB stock, non-maturity deposits, overnight borrowings, and accrued interest.

	At June 30, 2018				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	335,374	$	326,511	$	—	$	326,511	$	—
Loans, net (1)		3,540,903		3,470,434		—		—		3,470,434
Financial liabilities:
Term deposits		1,211,531		1,219,558		—		1,219,558		—
Term borrowings		497,372		486,278		—		486,278		—

(1) Comprised of loans (including impaired loans), net of deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses.

	At June 30, 2017				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	239,631	$	237,204	$	—	$	237,204	$	—
Loans, net (1)		3,566,703		3,532,998		—		—		3,532,998
Financial assets:
Term deposits		1,124,140		1,134,628		—		1,134,628		—
Term borrowings		489,859		487,305		—		487,305		—

(1) Comprised of loans (including impaired loans), net of deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses.

Limitations

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company's entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company's financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include the mortgage banking operation, deferred tax assets, and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

99

(19) Parent Company Only Financial Statements

The following condensed financial information for Oritani Financial Corp. (parent company only) reflect the investment in its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Oritani Bank, Oritani, LLC and Hampshire Financial, LLC, using the equity method of accounting.

Balance Sheets

	June 30,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Cash	$	34	$	51
Fed Funds Sold		56,552		24,440
ESOP loan		19,703		21,449
Securities available for sale, at fair value		1,565		1,498
Accrued Interest Receivable		440		399
Investment in Subsidiaries		481,412		524,413
Other assets		—		37
Total Assets	$	559,706	$	572,287
Liabilities and Equity
Borrowings		—		12,500
Other liabilities		360		564
Total Equity		559,346		559,223
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	559,706	$	572,287

Statements of Income

	Year Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Interest on mortgage loans	$	—		$	—		$	1,205
Interest on ESOP loan		845			815			838
Interest income on fed funds		377			295			176
Dividends/distributions from subsidiary		96,153			—			44,392
Gain on sale of securities		—			—			406
Other income		43			35			35
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(53,243	)		49,286			13,563
Total income		44,175			50,431			60,615
Interest on borrowings		67			404			405
Other expenses		1,375			1,016			979
Income before income tax expense		42,733			49,011			59,231
Income tax (benefit) expense		(161	)		(133	)		6,936
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295

100

Statements of Cash Flows

	Year Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		—			—			(406	)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		53,243			(49,286	)		(13,563	)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable		(41	)		12			118
Decrease in other assets		117			16			12
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(308	)		121			(155	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		95,905			7			38,301
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		—			—			1,013
Principal collected on ESOP loan		1,746			2,129			2,469
Decrease in mortgage loans, net		—			—			31,616
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,746			2,129			35,098
Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid to shareholders		(57,353	)		(51,850	)		(50,007	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(7,834	)		(1,574	)		(1,593	)
Stock issued upon exercise of stock options		12,131			9,567			14,705
Repayment of long term debt		(12,500	)		—			—
Cash used in financing activities		(65,556	)		(43,857	)		(36,895	)
Net change in cash and equivalents		32,095			(41,721	)		36,504
Cash at beginning of period		24,491			66,212			29,708
Cash at end of period	$	56,586		$	24,491		$	66,212

101

(20) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

	Fiscal 2018 Quarter Ended
	September 30		December 31		March 31		June 30
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income	$	37,920	$	38,052	$	37,561	$	39,293
Interest expense		10,276		10,444		10,608		11,572
Net interest income		27,644		27,608		26,953		27,721
Provision for loan losses		—		—		—		—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		27,644		27,608		26,953		27,721
Other income		971		623		979		1,015
Other expense		9,512		10,213		9,760		10,019
Income before income tax expense		19,103		18,018		18,172		18,717
Income tax expense		7,107		14,048		4,747		5,214
Net income	$	11,996	$	3,970	$	13,425	$	13,503
Basic Earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.09	$	0.30	$	0.30
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.09	$	0.30	$	0.30

	Fiscal 2017 Quarter Ended
	September 30		December 31		March 31		June 30(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income	$	34,060	$	35,251	$	36,586	$	36,565
Interest expense		8,760		9,022		9,791		10,278
Net interest income		25,300		26,229		26,795		26,287
Provision for loan losses		—		—		—		—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		25,300		26,229		26,795		26,287
Other income		1,258		1,183		21,741		(7,338	)
Other expense		10,268		11,058		9,893		14,710
Income before income tax expense		16,290		16,354		38,643		4,239
Income tax expense		5,679		4,978		14,377		1,348
Net income	$	10,611	$	11,376	$	24,266	$	2,891
Basic Earnings per common share	$	0.25	$	0.26	$	0.56	$	0.07
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	0.24	$	0.26	$	0.54	$	0.06

(1) Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000.  These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure.  Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure.  See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

(21) Earnings Per Share

The following is a summary of the Company's earnings per share calculations and reconciliations of basic to diluted earnings per share.

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except for per share data)
Net income	$	42,894	$	49,144	$	52,295
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic		44,226		43,263		41,864
Effect of dilutive non-vested shares and stock options outstanding		848		1,246		1,411
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted		45,074		44,509		43,275
Earnings per share-basic	$	0.97	$	1.14	$	1.25
Earnings per share-diluted	$	0.95	$	1.10	$	1.21

102

(22) Other Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income, both gross and net of tax, are presented for the periods below (in thousands):

	Years ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
Gross:
Net income	$	74,010		$	75,526		$	80,829
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(1,182	)		(2,795	)		1,011
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		324			883			(990	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		10,352			15,820			(13,936	)
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		35			402			224
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			8,112			—
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		503			1,482			(797	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		10,032			23,904			(14,488	)
Total comprehensive income		84,042			99,430			66,341
Tax applicable to:
Net income		31,116			26,382			28,534
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(437	)		(1,202	)		416
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		140			381			(428	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		3,556			6,839			(6,020	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			3,498			—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		14			156			95
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		156			640			(327	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		3,429			10,312			(6,264	)
Total comprehensive income		34,545			36,694			22,270
Net of tax:
Net income		42,894			49,144			52,295
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(745	)		(1,593	)		595
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		184			502			(562	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		6,796			8,981			(7,916	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			4,614			—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		21			246			129
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		347			842			(470	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		6,603			13,592			(8,224	)
Total comprehensive income	$	49,497		$	62,736		$	44,071

The following table presents the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

	Unrealized Holding Gains on Securities Available for Sale			Post Retirement Obligations			Unrealized Holding Gains on Interest Rate Swaps			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	438		$	(569	)	$	3,651		$	3,520
Net change		(561	)		368			6,796			6,603
Reclassification due to adoption of ASU No. 2018-02		37			(113	)		1,176			1,100
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	(86	)	$	(314	)	$	11,623		$	11,223
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	1,529		$	(1,657	)	$	(9,944	)	$	(10,072	)
Net change		(1,091	)		1,088			13,595			13,592
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	438		$	(569	)	$	3,651		$	3,520

103

The following table sets forth information about the amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the consolidated statement of income and the affected line item in the statement where net income is presented (in thousands).

		Year ended June 30,
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Component	Affected line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income	2018		2017		2016
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income	Net loss (gain) on sale of securities	$	324	$	883	$	(990	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income	Net loss on termination of derivatives		—		8,112		—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations (1)
Net loss			35		402		224
Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits			35		402		224
Total before tax			359		9,397		(766	)
Income tax expense (benefit)			154		4,035		(333	)
Net of tax		$	205	$	5,362	$	(433	)

(1) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computations of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 14, Postretirement Benefits.

(23) Real Estate Joint Ventures, net and Real Estate Held for Investment

The Company accounted for investments in joint ventures under the equity method.  The balance reflected the cost basis of investments, plus the Company's share of income earned on the joint venture operations, less cash distributions, including excess cash distributions, and the Company's share of losses on joint venture operations.  Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment in a joint venture was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities.  As of June 30, 2016, the Company had ownership interest in one joint venture entity that owned an income-producing commercial rental property.  This entity was sold during 2017.  Proceeds from the sale of joint investments for the year ended June 30, 2017 were $25.3 million resulting in gains of $20.9 million.  All other joint ventures investments were sold during fiscal 2016 and 2015.  Proceeds from the sale of joint investments for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $20.8 million resulting in gains of $19.7 million.

Real estate held for investment included the Company's undivided interest in real estate properties accounted for under the equity method and properties held for investment purposes.  Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment for an undivided interest in real estate property was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities.  The operations of the properties held for investment purposes are reflected in the financial results of the Company and included in the Other Income caption in the Income Statement.  Properties held for investment purposes were carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.  As of June 30, 2016, all real estate investments were sold during fiscal 2016 and 2015.  Proceeds from the sale of real estate investments for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $17.7 million resulting in gains of $17.8 million.

104

(24) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2018-02, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ASU 2018-02 allows the Company to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for the stranded tax effect resulting from the Tax Act. ASU 2018-02 is required to be adopted by the Company no later than January 1, 2019. The company early adopted ASU 2018-02  on January 1, 2018 and an election was made to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the amount of $1.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. See Footnote 12, Other Comprehensive Income, for further details.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, "Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities". The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align a company's financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities.  The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, permitted.   The Company plans to adopt ASU 2017-12 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019.  The update requires a modified retrospective transition method in which the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of the change on the opening balance of each affected component of equity in the statement of financial position as of the date of adoption.   While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, the Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting".  This update provides guidance about changes to terms or conditions of a share based payment award which would require modification accounting. In particular, an entity is required to account for the effects of a modification if the fair value, vesting condition or the equity/liability classification of the modified award is not the same immediately before and after a change to the terms and conditions of the award.  This update is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company  adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, "Compensation – Retirement Benefits, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost." This update will require employers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period.  Other components of the net periodic benefit cost will be presented separately from the service cost component.  This update will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory".  This update requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.  This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cashflows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments".  This update addresses eight specific cash flow issue with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice.  This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the update to materially impact the Company's statement of cash flows, although the classification of certain items could shift relative to past presentation.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments".  This update revises the methodology for estimating credit losses on loans receivable, held-to-maturity debt securities, unfunded loan commitments, and certain other financial assets measured at amortized cost.  Under ASU 2016-13, the current expected credit losses ("CECL") model is based on lifetime expected losses, rather than incurred losses, and requires the recognition of credit loss expense in the statement of income and a related allowance for credit losses on the balance sheet at the time of origination or purchase of a loan receivable or held-to-maturity debt security.  Subsequent changes in this estimate are recorded through credit loss expense and related allowance.  The CECL model requires the use of not only relevant historical experience and current conditions, but also reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events and circumstances, thus incorporating a broad range of information in developing credit loss estimates, which could result in significant changes to both the timing and amount of credit loss expense and allowance.  Under ASU 2016-13, available-for-sale debt securities are evaluated for impairment if fair value is less than amortized cost.  Estimated credit losses are recorded through a credit loss expense and an allowance, rather than a write-down of the investment.  Changes in fair value that are not credit-related will continue to be recorded in other comprehensive income.  Certain additional disclosures are required, including further disaggregation of credit quality indicators for loans receivable by year of origination.  This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  Entities will apply the standard's provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach).   The Company is evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements, the extent of which is indeterminable at this time as it will be dependent upon various factors at the date of adoption, including but not limited to portfolio composition, credit quality, economic conditions and forecasts at that time.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, "Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting". This ASU requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor's previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting.  Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The amendments in this Update require that an entity that has an available for sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The ASU was effective for all entities in fiscal years, and interim periods in those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption was permitted. The new guidance will be applied prospectively to changes in ownership (or influence) after the adoption date. We adopted this guidance on July 1, 2017 with no significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force))".  This ASU clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument (novation), that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, on its own, require dedesignation of that hedge accounting relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.  This ASU was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein.  Early adoption was permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  We adopted this guidance on July 1, 2017 with no significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)".  This ASU requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to current accounting treatment.  This ASU changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease execution costs, and, for lessors, modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases.  For public business entities, this ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein.  Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company's consolidated financial statements.  The Company expects a gross-up of its consolidated balance sheet as a result of recognizing lease liabilities and right of use assets; the extent of such gross-up is under evaluation.  The Company does not expect adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments.  The ASU revises an entity's accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value.  It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.  The disclosure of fair value of the loan portfolio will be impacted as the fair value will be calculated using an exit price.  The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017.   The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018. The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment for its equity instruments to the balance sheet as of July 1, 2018 in the amount of $658,000, representing the unrealized gain, net of tax at June 30, 2018. Going forward the fair value will be realized in the statement of income.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." The objective of this amendment is to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are in the scope of other standards. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 to defer for one year the effective date of the new revenue standard. The requirements are effective for annual periods and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016, the FASB issued further implementation guidance regarding revenue recognition. This additional guidance included clarification on certain principal versus agent considerations within the implementation of the guidance as well as clarification related to identifying performance obligations and licensing, assessing collectibility, presenting sales taxes, measuring noncash consideration, and certain transition matters. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.  The Company's primary revenue source is net interest income on financial instruments and, to a lesser extent, non-interest income  As the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans, leases, securities and derivatives that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the new revenue recognition standard does not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.  The Company's implementation efforts include the identification of revenue streams within the scope of the guidance, as well as the evaluation of revenue contracts.  While there were no material changes related to the timing or amount of revenue recognition, the guidance includes expanded disclosures to revenue which we are currently in the process of drafting.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of H.R. 1, commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act"), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes.

105

(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules

None.

(a)(3) Exhibits

3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of Oritani Financial Corp.*
3.2	Bylaws of Oritani Financial Corp.*
4	Form of Common Stock Certificate of Oritani Financial Corp.*
10.1	Employment Agreement between Oritani Financial Corp. and Kevin J. Lynch**, ******
10.2	Form of Employment Agreement between Oritani Financial Corp. and executive officers**, ******
10.3	Oritani Bank Director Retirement Plan***, ******
10.4	Oritani Bank Benefit Equalization Plan***, ******
10.5	Oritani Bank Executive Supplemental Retirement Income Agreement***, ******
10.6	Form of Employee Stock Ownership Plan***, ******
10.7	Director Deferred Fee Plan***, ******
10.8	Oritani Financial Corp. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan*****, ******
10.9	Oritani Financial Corp. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan****, ******
21	Subsidiaries of Registrant**
23.1	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
23.2	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

*  Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Oritani Financial Corp. (file No. 333-165226), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2010.

**  Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Oritani Financial Corp. (file No. 333-137309), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 14, 2006.

***  Incorporated by reference to Pre - Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A of Oritani Financial Corp. (file No. 333-137309), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 27, 2006.

**** Incorporated by reference to the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2011 Special Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2011 (file No. 001-34786).

***** Incorporated by reference to the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2008 (file No. 001-33223).

****** Management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement.

106

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

			ORITANI FINANCIAL CORP.
Date:	August 29, 2018	By:	/s/ Kevin J. Lynch
			Kevin J. Lynch
			Chief Executive Officer and President
			(Duly Authorized Representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures	Title	Date
/s/ Kevin J. Lynch	Director, Chief Executive Officer and President	August 29, 2018
Kevin J. Lynch	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ John M. Fields, Jr.	Director, Executive Vice President	August 29, 2018
John M. Fields, Jr.	and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ Ann Marie Jetton	Sr. Vice President and Principal	August 29, 2018
Ann Marie Jetton	Accounting Officer
/s/ Nicholas Antonaccio	Director	August 29, 2018
Nicholas Antonaccio
/s/ James J. Doyle, Jr.	Director	August 29, 2018
James J. Doyle, Jr.
/s/ Robert S. Hekemian, Jr.	Director	August 29, 2018
Robert S. Hekemian, Jr.
/s/ Harvey R. Hirschfeld	Director	August 29, 2018
Harvey R. Hirschfeld
/s/Judith Schumacher-Tilton	Director	August 29, 2018
Judith Schumacher-Tilton
/s/ John J. Skelly, Jr.	Director	August 29, 2018
John J. Skelly, Jr.

107

108

EX-23.1

Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-170135, 333-170136 and 333-178927 on Form S-8 of Oritani Financial Corp. of our report dated August 29, 2018, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Oritani Financial Corp. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oritani Financial Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2018.

/s/ Crowe LLP

Livingston, New Jersey

August 29, 2018

EX-23.2

Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries, of our report dated September 13, 2016, with respect to the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows of Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2016, and the related notes (collectively, the "consolidated financial statements"), which report appears in the June 30, 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oritani Financial Corp. and subsidiaries.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey August 29, 2018

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin J. Lynch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oritani Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 29, 2018	/s/ Kevin J. Lynch
		Kevin J. Lynch
		President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, John M. Fields, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oritani Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	August 29, 2018	/s/ John M. Fields, Jr.
		John M. Fields, Jr.
		Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32

Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Kevin J. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer and President of Oritani Financial Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and John M. Fields, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2018 (the “Report”) and that to the best of his knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:	August 29, 2018	/s/ Kevin J. Lynch
		Kevin J. Lynch
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:	August 29, 2018	/s/ John M. Fields, Jr.
		John M. Fields, Jr.
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Document and Entity Information - USD ($) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Aug. 29, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	Oritani Financial Corp.
Entity Central Index Key	0001483195
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--06-30
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Public Float			$ 666.0
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		46,621,646
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2018
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2018

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Assets
Cash on hand and in banks	$ 23,613	$ 33,252
Federal funds sold and short term investments	11,235	326
Cash and cash equivalents	34,848	33,578
Loans, net	3,540,903	3,566,703
Securities available for sale, at fair value	44,691	97,930
Securities held to maturity, fair value of $326,511 and $237,204, respectively.	335,374	239,631
Bank Owned Life Insurance (at cash surrender value)	98,438	95,946
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLB") stock, at cost	30,365	32,504
Accrued interest receivable	11,261	10,620
Real estate owned	1,564	140
Office properties and equipment, net	13,455	13,909
Deferred tax assets, net	25,864	37,693
Other assets	30,276	9,030
Total Assets	4,167,039	4,137,684
Liabilities
Deposits	2,915,128	2,856,478
Borrowings	596,372	642,059
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	24,169	23,496
Other liabilities	72,024	56,428
Total Liabilities	3,607,693	3,578,461
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 56,245,065 shares issued; 46,616,646 shares outstanding at June 30, 2018 and 45,992,366 shares outstanding at June 30, 2017	562	562
Additional paid-in capital	514,002	512,337
Restricted Stock Awards	(176)	(458)
Unallocated common stock held by the employee stock ownership plan	(16,631)	(18,407)
Treasury stock, at cost; 9,628,419 shares at June 30, 2018 and 10,252,699 shares at June 30, 2017	(129,433)	(136,517)
Retained income	179,799	198,186
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	11,223	3,520
Total stockholders' equity	559,346	559,223
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 4,167,039	$ 4,137,684

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Assets
Securities held to maturity, fair value	$ 326,511	$ 237,204
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	150,000,000	150,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	56,245,065	56,245,065
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	46,616,646	45,992,366
Treasury stock, shares (in shares)	9,628,419	10,252,699

XML

Consolidated Statements of Income - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Interest income:
Interest on mortgage loans	$ 144,051	$ 133,967	$ 125,427
Interest on securities available for sale	1,504	3,154	4,566
Interest on securities held to maturity	5,328	3,500	2,737
Dividends on FHLB stock	1,788	1,834	1,588
Interest on federal funds sold and short term investments	155	7	6
Total interest income	152,826	142,462	134,324
Interest expense:
Deposits (note 10)	31,624	24,671	17,884
Borrowings (note 12)	11,276	13,180	16,139
Total interest expense	42,900	37,851	34,023
Net interest income before provision for loan losses	109,926	104,611	100,301
Provision for loan losses (note 5)	0	0	0
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	109,926	104,611	100,301
Other income:
Service charges	1,119	881	949
Income from investments in real estate joint ventures	0	769	1,177
Bank Owned Life Insurance income	2,492	2,618	2,718
Net (loss) gain on sale of securities	(324)	(826)	990
Net gain on sale of assets and loans	0	20,856	37,544
Net (loss)/gain on sale of real estate owned	(2)	0	328
Net loss on termination of derivatives	0	(7,670)	0
Other income	303	333	625
Total other income	3,588	16,961	44,331
Operating expenses:
Compensation, payroll taxes and benefits (notes 14 and 15)	26,532	28,862	33,774
Advertising	571	502	361
Office occupancy and equipment expense (notes 9 and 16)	3,195	3,178	3,002
Data processing service fees	2,029	2,213	2,030
Federal insurance premiums	1,200	1,350	1,649
FHLBNY prepayment penalties	0	5,169	17,988
Other expenses	5,977	4,772	4,999
Total operating expenses	39,504	46,046	63,803
Income before income tax expense	74,010	75,526	80,829
Income tax expense (note 11)	31,116	26,382	28,534
Net income	$ 42,894	$ 49,144	$ 52,295
Basic income per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.97	$ 1.14	$ 1.25
Diluted income per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.95	$ 1.10	$ 1.21

XML

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Net of tax:
Net income	$ 42,894	$ 49,144	$ 52,295
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale	(745)	(1,593)	595
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income	184	502	(562)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps	6,796	8,981	(7,916)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income	0	4,614	0
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations	21	246	129
Change in funded status of retirement obligations	347	842	(470)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	6,603	13,592	(8,224)
Total comprehensive income	$ 49,497	$ 62,736	$ 44,071

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Common stock [Member]	Additional paid-in capital [Member]	Restricted Stock Awards [Member]	Treasury stock [Member]	Un-allocated common stock held by ESOP [Member]	Retained Income [Member]	Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax [Member]	Total
Balance at Jun. 30, 2015	$ 562	$ 508,999	$ (8,088)	$ (162,344)	$ (22,803)	$ 203,192	$ (1,848)	$ 517,670
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2015	44,012,239
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Net income	$ 0	0	0	0	0	52,295	0	52,295
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	0	0	0	0	0	0	(8,224)	(8,224)
Cash dividends declared	0	0	0	0	0	(50,007)	0	(50,007)
Purchase of treasury stock	$ 0	0	0	(1,593)	0	0	0	(1,593)
Purchase of treasury stock (in shares)	(100,978)
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock	$ 0	5,970	0	0	0	0	0	5,970
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released	0	2,095	0	0	2,322	0	0	4,417
Exercise of stock options	$ 0	0	0	17,704	0	(2,999)	0	14,705
Exercise of stock options (in shares)	1,332,159
Vesting of restricted stock awards	$ 0	(3,887)	3,906	0	0	(19)	0	0
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards	$ 0	0	73	(73)	0	0	0	0
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards (in shares)	(6,000)
Reclassification related to adoption of ASU (ASU 2016-09 [Member]) at Jun. 30, 2016	$ 0	0	0	0	0	(33)	0	(33)
Balance at Jun. 30, 2016	$ 562	513,177	(4,242)	(146,173)	(20,481)	202,429	(10,072)	535,200
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2016	45,247,420
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Net income	$ 0	0	0	0	0	49,144	0	49,144
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	0	0	0	0	0	0	13,592	13,592
Cash dividends declared	0	0	0	0	0	(51,850)	0	(51,850)
Purchase of treasury stock	$ 0	0	0	(1,574)	0	0	0	(1,574)
Purchase of treasury stock (in shares)	(98,655)
Issuance of restricted stock awards	$ 0	0	(133)	133	0	0	0	0
Issuance of restricted stock awards (in shares)	10,000
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock	$ 0	1,004	0	0	0	0	0	1,004
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released	0	2,066	0	0	2,074	0	0	4,140
Exercise of stock options	$ 0	0	0	11,097	0	(1,530)	0	9,567
Exercise of stock options (in shares)	833,601
Vesting of restricted stock awards	$ 0	(3,910)	3,917	0	0	(7)	0	0
Balance at Jun. 30, 2017	$ 562	512,337	(458)	(136,517)	(18,407)	198,186	3,520	$ 559,223
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2017	45,992,366							45,992,366
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholders' Equity [Roll Forward]
Net income	$ 0	0	0	0	0	42,894	0	$ 42,894
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	0	0	0	0	0	0	6,603	6,603
Cash dividends declared	0	0	0	0	0	(57,353)	0	(57,353)
Purchase of treasury stock	$ 0	0	0	(7,834)	0	0	0	(7,834)
Purchase of treasury stock (in shares)	(492,458)
Compensation cost for stock options and restricted stock	$ 0	178	0	0	0	0	0	178
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released	0	1,728	0	0	1,776	0	0	3,504
Exercise of stock options	$ 0	0	0	15,005	0	(2,874)	0	12,131
Exercise of stock options (in shares)	1,123,738
Vesting of restricted stock awards	$ 0	(241)	195	0	0	46	0	0
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards	$ 0	0	87	(87)	0	0	0	0
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards (in shares)	(7,000)
Reclassification related to adoption of ASU (ASU 2018-02 [Member]) at Jun. 30, 2018	$ 0	0	0	0	0	(1,100)	1,100	0
Balance at Jun. 30, 2018	$ 562	$ 514,002	$ (176)	$ (129,433)	$ (16,631)	$ 179,799	$ 11,223	$ 559,346
Balance (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2018	46,616,646							46,616,646

XML

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) [Abstract]
Cash dividend declared per share (in dollars per share)	$ 1.30	$ 1.20	$ 1.20

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$ 42,894	$ 49,144	$ 52,295
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
ESOP and stock-based compensation expense	3,682	5,144	10,387
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation	1,122	1,430	2,118
Depreciation of premises and equipment	810	864	910
Net amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on securities	1,170	1,322	1,145
Provision for losses on loans	0	0	0
Amortization and accretion of deferred loan fees, net	(2,692)	(2,262)	(3,371)
Decrease (increase) in deferred taxes	8,763	(982)	229
Loss (gain) on sale of securities	324	826	(990)
Gain on sale of real estate joint ventures and real estate investments	0	(20,856)	(37,544)
Net loss on termination of derivatives	0	7,670	0
Loss (gain) on sale of real estate owned	2	0	(328)
Writedown of real estate owned	0	215	250
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance	(2,492)	(2,618)	(2,718)
Increase in accrued interest receivable	(641)	(677)	(677)
(Increase) decrease in other assets	(11,814)	20,194	(9,708)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities	15,651	(22,195)	16,008
Net cash provided by operating activities	56,779	37,219	28,006
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable	96,155	(366,559)	(273,846)
Purchase of mortgage loans	(69,227)	(65,925)	(98,845)
Purchase of securities available for sale	0	(66,222)	(42,213)
Purchase of securities held to maturity	(144,959)	(110,664)	(82,591)
Proceeds from payments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale	22,350	51,573	59,188
Proceeds from payments, calls and maturities of securities held to maturity	48,247	36,561	22,010
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	29,505	55,093	100,468
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity	0	1,995	0
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned	138	132	3,967
Proceeds from redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	45,997	74,723	56,337
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock	(43,858)	(69,224)	(54,442)
Proceeds from sales of real estate joint ventures and real estate investments	0	25,318	38,614
Net increase in real estate held for investment	0	0	(23)
Net (increase) decrease in real estate joint ventures	0	(155)	648
Purchase of fixed assets	(356)	(419)	(835)
Net cash used in investing activities	(16,008)	(433,773)	(271,563)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	58,650	596,475	297,266
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock	12,131	9,567	14,705
Purchase of treasury stock	(7,834)	(1,574)	(1,593)
Dividends paid to shareholders	(57,353)	(51,850)	(50,007)
Increase in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance	673	2,081	970
Proceeds from borrowed funds	82,683	144,130	353,433
Repayment of borrowed funds	(128,370)	(283,694)	(368,182)
Payment of employee taxes withheld from shared-based awards	(81)	(1,574)	(1,593)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(39,501)	413,561	244,999
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	1,270	17,007	1,442
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	33,578	16,571	15,129
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	34,848	33,578	16,571
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	42,770	38,085	34,475
Income taxes	22,668	30,103	27,272
Noncash transfer
Loans receivable transferred to real estate owned	$ 1,564	$ 0	$ 317

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Oritani Financial Corp. (the "Company"), and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Oritani Bank (the "Bank"); Hampshire Financial, LLC, and Oritani, LLC, and the wholly owned subsidiaries of Oritani Bank, Oritani Finance Company, Ormon LLC ("Ormon"), and Oritani Investment Corp., as well as its wholly owned subsidiary, Oritani Asset Corporation (a real estate investment trust), collectively, the Company. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Business

The Company provides a wide range of deposit banking services to individual and corporate customers in the New Jersey counties of Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic. The Company provides loans to individual and corporate customers in New Jersey as well as corporate customers primarily in portions of the states of New York and Pennsylvania. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

The following are the significant accounting policies which were followed in preparing and presenting these consolidated financial statements.

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2018 and 2017, and in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans.  In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, management generally obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

A substantial portion of the Company's loans are secured by real estate in the New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania markets. In addition, the real estate joint ventures and real estate owned are located in that same market. Accordingly, as with most financial institutions in the market area, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Company's loan portfolio and the recovery of the carrying amount of real estate joint ventures and real estate owned are susceptible to changes in market conditions.

Securities

Securities include debt, mortgage-backed and marketable equity securities. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities as either available for sale or held to maturity at the purchase date. Securities that may be sold in response to changing market and interest rate conditions or as part of an overall asset/liability strategy are classified as available for sale. Gains or losses on sales of securities available for sale are based upon the specific-identification method. Securities classified as available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses net of applicable taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of equity. If management has the intent and the ability at the time of purchase to hold securities until maturity, they are classified as held to maturity. Securities held to maturity are carried at cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums and discounts. Premiums and discounts on securities are accreted or amortized using the level-yield method over the estimated lives of the securities, including the effect of prepayments. Any portion of unrealized loss on an individual equity security deemed to be other than temporarily impaired is recognized as a loss in operations in the period in which such determination is made. For debt investment securities deemed other than temporarily impaired, the investment is written down through current earnings by the impairment related to the estimated credit loss and the non-credit related impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income.  In the ordinary course of business, securities are pledged as collateral in conjunction with the Company's borrowings, lines of credit and derivative portfolios.

Loans

Mortgages on real estate and other loans are stated at the outstanding principal amount of the loans, net of deferred loan fees/costs and the allowance for loan losses. Loan origination and commitment fees, net of related costs, are deferred and amortized as an adjustment to the loan's yield, utilizing the level yield method, over the actual lives of the related loans. Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to interest income as earned. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become delinquent 90 days or more as to principal or interest, or when it appears that principal or interest is uncollectible. Interest accrued prior to a loan being placed on nonaccrual status is subsequently reversed. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only in the period it is ultimately collected. Loans are returned to an accrual status when factors indicating doubtful collectibility no longer exist. Loans are generally charged off after an analysis is completed which indicates, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, collectibility of principal and interest is highly questionable and improbable.

The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on current information, that the Company will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans individually classified as impaired include loans which have a principal balance balances of $1.0 million or more and are ninety days or more delinquent, unless a condition exists for loans less than $1.0 million that would increase the Bank's potential loss exposure.  All TDRs are considered impaired loans, regardless of their principal balance.  Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that each loan's carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the related collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows. Residential mortgage and consumer loans are deemed smaller balance homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment and are generally excluded from the population of impaired loans.

The portion of any residential real estate mortgage loan that is not adequately secured is generally charged off when deemed to be uncollectible unless it can be clearly demonstrated that repayment will occur regardless of the delinquency status. Examples that would demonstrate repayment include; a loan that is adequately secured by collateral and is in the process of collection; a loan supported by a valid guarantee or insurance; or a loan supported by a valid claim against a solvent estate. Charge-offs of commercial real estate mortgage loans are made on the basis of management's ongoing evaluation of nonperforming loans. In the ordinary course of business, loans are pledged as collateral in conjunction with the Company's borrowings.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged to income based on management's evaluation of the probable incurred losses inherent in its portfolio.  Such evaluation includes a review of the entire loan portfolio, including all loans for which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured and considers, among other matters, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions and other matters which warrant consideration. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific reserves for individually impaired loans, (ii) reserves for adversely classified, or higher risk rated, loans that are not impaired, (iii) reserves for other loans based on historical loss factors (using the appropriate loss look-back and loss emergence periods) adjusted for both internal and external qualitative risk factors.  See Note 5, "Allowance for Loan Losses" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses and loan credit quality.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions in the Company's market area.  In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses.  Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Troubled-Debt Restructuring

Troubled debt restructured ("TDR") loans are those loans whose terms have been modified because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Modifications could include extension of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and forgiveness of accrued interest and/or principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured until paid in full or, if the restructured debt is at a market rate (a rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a six month period.

Real Estate Owned

Real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated selling costs, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in the economic conditions. Operating costs after acquisition are expensed.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

Bank-owned life insurance is accounted for using the cash surrender value method and is recorded at its realizable value adjusted for other charges or amounts due that are probable at settlement.  The change in the cash surrender value, as well as insurance proceeds are included in other noninterest income.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock

The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLB"), is required to hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB in an amount based on the Bank's total investment in mortgage related assets and advances.  The requirement pertaining to mortgage related assets is a range from 0.10% to 0.25% of mortgage related assets, and is currently equal to 0.20%. The requirement pertaining to advances is a range from 4.0% to 5.0% of total advances, and is currently equal to 4.5%.  The stock is carried at cost.  In performing our other-than-temporary impairment analysis of FHLB stock, we evaluated, among other things, (i) its earnings performance, including the significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the regulatory capital amount of the FHLB, (ii) the commitment by the FHLB to make required dividend payments, and (iii) the liquidity position of the FHLB.  We do not consider this security to be impaired at June 30, 2018.  Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net

The Company accounted for investments in joint ventures under the equity method. The balance reflected the cost basis of investments, plus the Company's share of income earned on the joint venture operations, less cash distributions, including excess cash distributions, and the Company's share of losses on joint venture operations. Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment in a joint venture was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities.

Real Estate Held for Investment

Real estate held for investment included the Company's undivided interest in real estate properties accounted for under the equity method and properties held for investment purposes. Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment for an undivided interest in real estate property was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities. The operations of the properties held for investment purposes were reflected in the financial results of the Company and included in the Other Income caption in the Income Statement. Properties held for investment purposes were carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.

Office Properties and Equipment

Land is carried as cost.  Office properties and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation of office properties and equipment is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.  The Company uses the following estimated useful lives for its office properties and equipment categories: land improvements – 15 years; building and major building improvements – 40 years; minor building improvements – 10 years and furniture and fixtures – 3 to 7 years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the remaining life of the lease or the useful life of the improvement.  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

Employee Benefit Plans

The Bank has a defined benefit pension plan which covered all employees who satisfied the eligibility requirements.  The Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2008.  The defined benefit pension plan is a multi-employer plan.  Costs of the pension plan are based on the contribution required to be made to the program.  The Bank's policy is to fund at least the minimum contribution required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

The Bank has a 401(k) savings incentive plan covering substantially all employees of the Bank. The Bank may match a percentage of the first 6% of employee contributions. The contribution percentage is determined annually by the Board of Directors.

The employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP") is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans."  The funds borrowed by the ESOP from the Company to purchase the Company's common stock will be repaid from the Bank's contributions over a period of up to 25 years.  The Company's common stock not yet allocated to participants is recorded as a reduction of stockholders' equity at cost.  Compensation expense for the ESOP is based on the market price of the Company's stock and is recognized as shares are committed to be released to participants.  Dividends on allocated shares reduce retained earnings; dividends on unallocated ESOP shares reduce debt and accrued interest.

The Bank provides several nonqualified, defined benefit plans which provide benefits to executive officers and directors of the Company. These plans are unfunded and the costs of the plans are recognized over the period that services are provided.

The Company provides several post-retirement benefit plans to directors and certain retired employees and will provide such benefits to certain active officers that are accounted for in accordance with ASC 715, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits". This guidance requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial condition the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation; (b) measure a plan's assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the date of its year-end balance sheet and (c) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits that arise during the period. The Company accrues the cost of post-retirement benefit plans during the employee's period of active service.

The Company's equity incentive plan is accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation".  This guidance requires companies to recognize in the statement of earnings the grant-date fair value of stock based awards issued to employees.  Compensation cost related to stock based awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.  In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"), an amendment to ASC 718.  The update simplifies certain aspects of accounting for share-based payments.  The amendments include the following:

• Excess tax benefits and deficiencies resulting from exercise or vesting of stock awards are recorded as income tax expense or benefit on the income statement.  Previously, excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies were recorded in additional paid-in capital.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• For diluted earnings per share calculations, excess tax benefits are no longer included in assumed proceeds when determining average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method, resulting in changes to average diluted shares outstanding.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• Excess tax benefits or deficiencies are included as income tax expense as discrete items in the period in which they occur, which impact the effective tax rate in each reporting period; however, these discrete items are not included in the projected annual effective tax rate calculation.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• Excess tax benefits are presented as cash flows from operating activities.  Previously, excess tax benefits were included as a cash inflow from financing activities.  This update may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively upon adoption.  This update was applied retrospectively upon adoption.

• Cash paid by an employer to taxing authorities when withholding shares for tax withholding purposes is presented as cash outflows from financing activities.  Previously, there was no specific guidance on cash flow presentation, and these outflows were presented within cash flows from operating activities.  This update is required to be applied retrospectively upon adoption.

• An accounting policy election, at the entity level using a modified retrospective transition method, to account for forfeitures as they occur or estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited, as is currently required.  The Company elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.

The update was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  Any adjustments from the update was required to be applied as of the beginning of the year of adoption.  The Company adopted the update during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, and retroactively applied the guidance effective as of July 1, 2015.  The update under ASC 718 resulted in a cumulative effect debit adjustment of $33,000 to retained earnings as of July 1, 2015.  The most significant impact of the amended guidance resulted in recognition of excess tax benefits within income tax expense, which resulted in an increase to net income and earnings per share.  In addition, this guidance increases average diluted shares, since the Company no longer includes such excess tax benefits in the calculation of diluted shares.  Certain amounts or ratios presented for 2016 interim periods were restated to reflect the adoption of the new guidance.  Adoption of the update did not affect the  Company or Bank's total equity, book value per share, or regulatory capital ratios.

Income Taxes

The Company records income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, "Income Taxes," using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Where applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period of enactment. The valuation allowance is adjusted, by a charge or credit to income tax expense, as changes in facts and circumstances warrant. Income taxes are allocated to the individual entities within the consolidated group based on the effective tax rate of the entity.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.  As part of its asset/liability management strategies, the Company  uses interest rate swaps to hedge variability in future cash flows caused by changes in interest rates and accounts for these swaps as cash flow hedges.  Interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or liability at fair value. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income or loss and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged forecasted transactions affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. We formally document our risk management objectives, strategy, and the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged items. We evaluate the effectiveness of the hedge relationship, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction.  Derivatives not designated as hedges do not meet the hedge accounting requirements under U.S. GAAP.  Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of  net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes items recorded directly to equity, such as unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, change in actuarial gains and losses on other post retirement benefits, unrealized gains and losses on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships, and change in service cost on other postretirement benefits, net of taxes. Comprehensive income and its components is presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for all periods presented. See Note 22 for additional disclosures.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share, or EPS, is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.  The weighted average common shares outstanding include the average number of shares of common stock outstanding and allocated or committed to be released Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares.

Diluted earnings per share is computed using the same method as basic earnings per share, but reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock were exercised and converted into common stock.  These potentially dilutive shares would then be included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period using the treasury stock method.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  The update amended the diluted earnings per share calculation in that excess tax benefits are no longer included in assumed proceeds when determining average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method.  This guidance is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.  For further discussion, see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Employee Benefit Plans".

When applying the treasury stock method for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we add the assumed proceeds from option exercises and the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options.  We then divide this sum by our average stock price to calculate shares repurchased.  The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted EPS.  For the years ended June 30, 2016, we added: (1) the assumed proceeds from option exercises; (2) the tax benefit that would have been credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of restricted stock; and (3) the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options.  We then divided this sum by our average stock price to calculate shares repurchased.  The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted EPS.

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the consolidated statement of condition date of June 30, 2018, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.  The evaluation was conducted through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Reclassifications

Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform with the current period's reporting format.

XML

Stock Repurchase Program

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Stock Repurchase Program [Abstract]

Stock Repurchase Program

(2) Stock Repurchase Program

On March 4, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a fourth stock repurchase plan pursuant to which the Company is authorized to repurchase up to 5% of the outstanding shares, or 2,205,451 shares.  As of June 30, 2018, a total of 13,277,681 shares were acquired under repurchase programs at a weighted average cost of $13.30 per share. The timing of the repurchases depend on certain factors, including but not limited to, market conditions and prices, the Company's liquidity and capital requirements, and alternative uses of capital. Repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes.  The Company may also conduct repurchases through a Rule 10b5-1trading plan. At June 30, 2018, there are 1,888,851 shares yet to be purchased under the current repurchase plan.

XML

Cash and Cash Equivalents

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Cash and Cash Equivalents [Abstract]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

(3) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and in banks and federal funds sold and short term investments which are generally sold for one-day periods. There are no restrictions on the Company's cash and cash equivalents.

XML

Loans

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Loans, net [Abstract]

Loans, net

(4) Loans

A comparative summary of loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	June 30, 2018		June 30, 2017
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	267,771	$	253,310
Residential commercial real estate		2,005,315		1,945,297
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		497,708		535,567
Other commercial real estate		796,589		866,826
Construction and land loans		10,960		4,210
Total loans		3,578,343		3,605,210
Less:
Deferred loan fees, net		6,878		8,235
Allowance for loan losses		30,562		30,272
Net loans	$	3,540,903	$	3,566,703

At June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had fixed-rate mortgage commitments of $32.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and variable-rate mortgage commitments of $25.7 million and $65.5 million, respectively, which are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The rate range of the fixed rate commitments at June 30, 2018 was 3.75% to 5.50%. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. There is no exposure to credit loss in the event the other party does not exercise its right to borrow under the commitment.

Our residential lending area generally encompasses northern New Jersey.  Our market area for commercial lending, including residential CRE, is broader, generally including the state of New Jersey, eastern Pennsylvania, southern New York, New York City, Long Island, and Delaware.  Our consumer lending is generally limited to the bank's designated lending area which is considerably closer to our branch offices.

Borrowers' abilities to repay their obligations are dependent upon various factors, including the borrowers' income and net worth, cash flows generated by the underlying collateral, value of the underlying collateral and priority of the Company's lien on the property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances beyond the Company's control; the Company is therefore subject to risk of loss. The Company believes that its lending policies and procedures adequately minimize the potential exposure to such risks and that adequate provisions for losses are provided for all known and inherent risks.

Collateral and/or guarantees are generally required for all loans. In underwriting a loan secured by real property, we require an appraisal of the property by an independent licensed appraiser approved by the Company's board of directors. The appraisal is subject to review by an independent third party hired by the Company. Generally, management obtains updated appraisals when a loan is deemed impaired. These appraisals may be more limited than those prepared for the underwriting of a new loan. In addition, when the Company acquires other real estate owned, it generally obtains a current appraisal to substantiate the net carrying value of the asset.

The aggregate amount of loans to our executive officers, directors and their related entities was $21.5 million and $22.1 million  at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.  We had $305,000 in new loans in 2018. New loans to executive officers, directors and their related entities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 totaled $2.3 million. Repayments from executive officers, directors and their related entities for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, totaled $864,000 and $13.6 million, respectively.  These loans were performing according to their original terms at June 30, 2018.

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Allowance for Loan Losses [Abstract]

Allowance for Loan Losses

(5) Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is the estimated amount considered necessary to cover probable and reasonably estimable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses that is charged against income. In determining the allowance for loan losses, we make significant estimates and, therefore, have identified the allowance as a critical accounting policy. The methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting policy by management because of the high degree of judgment involved, the subjectivity of the assumptions used, and the potential for changes in the economic environment that could result in changes to the amount of the recorded allowance for loan losses.

The allowance for loan losses has been determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. We are responsible for the timely and periodic determination of the amount of the allowance required. We believe that our allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover specifically identifiable losses, as well as estimated losses inherent in our portfolio for which certain losses are probable but not specifically identifiable.

Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.  The analysis of the allowance for loan losses has two components: specific and general allocations.  Loan risk ratings are an important part of the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.  The Credit department classifies all loans within the following categories: Superior, Desirable, Pass, Low Pass, Watch, Special Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss.  The Company utilizes the services of a third party loan review firm to evaluate the loan ratings assigned by the Credit department and related file maintenance items.  Reviews are performed quarterly and, on an annual basis, the third party firm reviews an aggregate of approximately 65% of the commercial real estate portfolios, including a sampling of both new and seasoned loans, a review of all "Regulation O" loans, construction loans with balances of $250,000 or more, and review of all criticized or classified CRE loans with balances of $250,000 or more.  Their scope is determined by the Audit Committee.  The firm prepares quarterly reports that include a rating for all loans reviewed over the period.  There is typically a very high degree of correlation between the loan ratings assigned by the Credit department and the loan ratings determined by the third party loan review firm.

Specific allocations are made for loans that are impaired. Management will identify loans that have demonstrated issues that cause concern regarding full collectibility in the required time frame and classified certain loans with such characteristics as impaired. Delinquency and internal credit department reviews are key indicators of such issues. In general, loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings and loans that are greater than $1.0 million and delinquent more than 90 days are considered impaired.  Impaired values are determined by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows or, for collateral-dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral adjusted for market conditions and selling expenses.  Specific reserves are calculated by subtracting the impaired value of a loan from the book value of the loan.  No reserve is necessary if the impaired value exceeds the book value.  Impaired loans are included within the Substandard classification.

The Superior, Desirable, Pass, Low Pass and Watch ratings are all considered to be "Pass" classification loans.  A general reserve is determined for such loans by segregating the Pass classification loans by segment. The following issues are evaluated and general reserve factors are calculated for each loan segment for each issue:

•Historical charge-offs,

•Lending policy and procedures,

•Economic and business conditions,

•Nature and volume of portfolio,

•Lending staff,

•Volume and severity of delinquent loans,

•Loan review system,

•Collateral values, and

•Concentrations of credit.

In the process of determining appropriate reserve factors regarding historical charge-offs, both a look back period and loss emergence periods were utilized.  The look back period is the time frame used to measure historical charge-offs.  The look back period utilized by the Company was eight years.  The loss emergence period represents the estimated average time between when a loss event occurs and when such loss is specifically reserved or charged off by the Company.  The loss emergence period utilized by the Company varied by loan segment, and ranged from 12 to 33 months.

The general reserve factors are totaled for each loan segment and applied to the appropriate period end balance.  This process determines the general reserve for the Pass classification loans.  The non-impaired loans that are rated Special Mention, Substandard or Doubtful are determined and a general reserve percentage is then applied to all such loans.  The sum of the general reserves for the Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful loans plus the general reserves for the Pass classification loans equals the total general reserves at period end.

On a quarterly basis, the Chief Financial Officer:

• Reviews all impaired loans individually, determines the appropriate impaired loan balance and calculates any necessary specific reserves. The most current appraised value is generally used as the basis for the value of the collateral.

• Summarizes by rating classification all remaining loans that are graded either "Special Mention," "Substandard" or "Doubtful," determines the appropriate general reserve percentage and calculates the necessary general reserve. The reserve percentage utilized is increased as the classification severity increases.

• Reviews and updates, as necessary, the general reserves appropriate for Pass classification loans, by segment.  The appropriate general reserve factor is then applied to the balance in each loan segment and the necessary general reserve is calculated.

The results are summarized and an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses is determined. This level is compared to the "pre-analysis" level of allowance for loan losses and, if necessary, an adjustment is made through the provision for loan losses in order to reflect the appropriate level of allowance for loan losses.

The results of this quarterly process are summarized and processed accordingly. All supporting documentation is maintained by the Chief Financial Officer. A summary of loan loss allowances is presented to the Audit Committee on a quarterly basis for approval.

This evaluation of the allowance for loan losses is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revisions based upon changes in economic and real estate market conditions. Actual loan losses may be significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we have established, which could have a material negative effect on our financial results.

We have a concentration of loans secured by real property located in our lending area. Our residential lending area generally encompasses northern New Jersey. Our market area for commercial lending, including residential CRE, is broader, generally including the state of New Jersey, eastern Pennsylvania, southern New York, New York City, Long Island, and Delaware. As a substantial amount of our loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, appraisals of the underlying value of property securing loans are critical in determining the amount of the allowance required for specific loans. Assumptions for appraisal valuations are instrumental in determining the value of properties. In order to reduce the potential for undue influence on the appraisal process, we use an external appraisal firm as our Appraisal Manager. The Appraisal Manager generally does not perform any appraisals but obtains quotes for necessary appraisal work from one of our approved, qualified appraisal firms.  The Appraisal Manager, in concert with our credit department, determines the firm to be utilized and orders the work. Completed appraisals are sent to the Appraisal Manager. The Appraisal Manager then reviews the appraisal addressing all key assumptions utilized in the appraisal. The completed appraisal and the written review are then forwarded to the Chief Credit Officer. Based on the composition of our loan portfolio, we believe the primary risks are increases in interest rates, a decline in the economy generally, and a decline in real estate market values in our lending area. Any one or combination of these events may adversely affect our loan portfolio resulting in increased delinquencies, loan losses and future levels of loan loss provisions. We consider it important to maintain the ratio of our allowance for loan losses to total loans at an adequate level. Factors such as current economic conditions, interest rates, and the composition of the loan portfolio will affect our determination of the level of this ratio for any particular period.

Our allowance for loan losses in recent years reflects probable incurred losses resulting from the actual growth in our loan portfolio, ongoing local and regional economic conditions and our overall levels of charge-offs, delinquencies, impaired loans and nonaccrual loans. We believe the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2018 adequately reflects our portfolio credit risk, given our emphasis on commercial real estate lending and current market conditions.

Although we believe we have established and maintained the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels, adjustments may be necessary if future economic and other conditions differ substantially from the current operating environment.  Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate that is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. In addition, the FDIC and the NJDOBI, as an integral part of their examination process, will periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. The most recent such examination was performed by the NJDOBI as of March 31, 2017.

Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	30,272		$	29,951		$	30,889
Provisions charged to operations		—			—			—
Recoveries		407			409			9
Loans charged off		(117	)		(88	)		(947	)
Balance at end of year	$	30,562		$	30,272		$	29,951

The following tables provide the twelve month activity in the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.

	Year ended June 30, 2018
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,261		$	15,794	$	3,000	$	10,017		$	200	$	30,272
Charge-offs		(117	)		—		—		—			—		(117	)
Recoveries		150			—		—		225			32		407
Provisions		696			1,465		15		(2,414	)		238		—
Ending balance	$	1,990		$	17,259	$	3,015	$	7,828		$	470	$	30,562

	Year ended June 30, 2017
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate			Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,300		$	12,837	$	3,646		$	11,850		$	318		$	29,951
Charge-offs		(75	)		—		—			(13	)		—			(88	)
Recoveries		—			—		—			409			—			409
Provisions		36			2,957		(646	)		(2,229	)		(118	)		—
Ending balance	$	1,261		$	15,794	$	3,000		$	10,017		$	200		$	30,272

	Year ended June 30, 2016
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate			Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,521		$	10,814	$	4,042		$	13,943		$	569		$	30,889
Charge-offs		(98	)		—		—			(849	)		—			(947	)
Recoveries		—			—		—			9			—			9
Provisions		(123	)		2,023		(396	)		(1,253	)		(251	)		—
Ending balance	$	1,300		$	12,837	$	3,646		$	11,850		$	318		$	29,951

The following table details the amount of loans receivables that are evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and the related portion of allowance for loan loss that is allocated to each loan portfolio segment at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

	At June 30, 2018
	Residential		Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate		Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,990		17,259		3,015		7,828		470		30,562
Total	$	1,990	$	17,259	$	3,015	$	7,828	$	470	$	30,562
Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,022	$	—	$	—	$	4,181	$	—	$	9,203
Collectively evaluated for impairment		262,749		2,005,315		497,708		792,408		10,960		3,569,140
Total	$	267,771	$	2,005,315	$	497,708	$	796,589	$	10,960	$	3,578,343

	June 30, 2017
	Residential		Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate		Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	43	$	—	$	43
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,261		15,794		3,000		9,974		200		30,229
Total	$	1,261	$	15,794	$	3,000	$	10,017	$	200	$	30,272
Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,684	$	—	$	—	$	10,173	$	—	$	13,857
Collectively evaluated for impairment		249,626		1,945,297		535,567		856,653		4,210		3,591,353
Total	$	253,310	$	1,945,297	$	535,567	$	866,826	$	4,210	$	3,605,210

The Company continuously monitors the credit quality of its loans receivable.  In addition to internal staff, the Company utilizes the services of a third party loan review firm to review management's ratings on a selection of loans.  Credit quality is monitored by reviewing certain credit quality indicators.  Assets classified as "Satisfactory" are deemed to possess average to superior credit quality, requiring no more than normal attention.  Assets classified as "Pass/Watch" have generally acceptable asset quality yet possess higher risk characteristics/circumstances than satisfactory assets. Such characteristics include strained liquidity, slow pay, stale financial statements or other circumstances requiring greater attention from bank staff.  We classify an asset as "Special Mention" if the asset has a potential weakness that warrants management's close attention.  Such weaknesses, if left uncorrected may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects of the asset.  An asset is considered "Substandard" if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.  Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.  Assets classified as "Doubtful" have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Included in the Substandard caption are all loans that were past due 90 days (or more) and all impaired loans.

The following table provides information about the loan credit quality at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Credit Quality Indicators at June 30, 2018
	Satisfactory		Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	242,534	$	18,731	$	171	$	6,335	$	—	$	267,771
Residential commercial real estate		1,981,781		21,952		1,582		—		—		2,005,315
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		494,723		—		2,985		—		—		497,708
Other commercial real estate		688,725		92,430		10,164		5,270		—		796,589
Construction and land loans		10,960		—		—		—		—		10,960
Total	$	3,418,723	$	133,113	$	14,902	$	11,605	$	—	$	3,578,343

	Credit Quality Indicators at June 30, 2017
	Satisfactory		Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	229,481	$	17,256	$	1,571	$	5,002	$	—	$	253,310
Residential commercial real estate		1,915,526		27,778		1,753		240		—		1,945,297
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		532,472		—		3,095		—		—		535,567
Other commercial real estate		725,714		107,249		15,551		18,312		—		866,826
Construction and land loans		4,210		—		—		—		—		4,210
Total	$	3,407,403	$	152,283	$	21,970	$	23,554	$	—	$	3,605,210

Included in loans are loans for which the accrual of interest income has been discontinued due to deterioration in the financial condition of the borrowers. The principal amount of nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $7.9 million, $10.2 million and $10.0 million, respectively. If the nonaccrual loans had performed in accordance with their original terms, interest income would have increased by $198,000 and $283,000 and $555,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016 respectively. The Company has no loans past due 90 days or more that are still accruing interest.

The following table summarizes the delinquency and accrual status of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	At June 30, 2018
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual (1)
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	2,696	$	753	$	5,213	$	8,662	$	259,109	$	267,771	$	6,335
Residential commercial real estate		1,582		—		—		1,582		2,003,733		2,005,315		—
Grocery/credit retail CRE		—		—		—		—		497,708		497,708		—
Other commercial real estate		1,009		—		136		1,145		795,444		796,589		1,542
Construction and land loans		—		—		—		—		10,960		10,960		—
Total	$	5,287	$	753	$	5,349	$	11,389	$	3,566,954	$	3,578,343	$	7,877

	At June 30, 2017
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual (2)
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	1,243	$	1,776	$	614	$	3,633	$	249,677	$	253,310	$	1,556
Residential commercial real estate		240		—		—		240		1,945,057		1,945,297		—
Grocery/credit retail CRE		—		—		—		—		535,567		535,567		—
Other commercial real estate		606		—		1,897		2,503		864,323		866,826		8,667
Construction and land loans		—		—		—		—		4,210		4,210		—
Total	$	2,089	$	1,776	$	2,511	$	6,376	$	3,598,834	$	3,605,210	$	10,223

(1) Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2018 are residential loans totaling $35,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $582,000  that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $504,000 and other CRE loans totaling $1.4 million that were less than 30 days past due.

(2) Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2017 are residential loans totaling $716,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $205,000 that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $21,000 and other CRE loans totaling $6.8 million that were less than 30 days past due.

Impaired loans at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $9.2 million, $13.9 million and $13.2 million respectively.  There were no impaired loans with an allocation in the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2018. The allocation in the allowance for loan losses for impaired loans at 2017 and 2016 were $43,000 on balances of $538,000 and $118,000 on balances of $487,000, respectively. Impaired loans with no related allowance at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $9.2 million, $13.3 million and $12.7 million, respectively. The average balance of impaired loans was $8.9 million, $13.1 million and $13.4 million during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest income recognized on these loans for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $450,000, $706,000 and $409,000, respectively.

The following table provides information about the Company's impaired loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Impaired Financing Receivables
	At June 30, 2018									Year ended June 30, 2018
	Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance			Allowance			Average Recorded Investment			Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential		$	5,021		$	5,022		$	—		$	4,614		$	64
Other commercial real estate			4,018			4,181			—			4,317			386
			9,039			9,203			—			8,931			450
Total:
Residential		$	5,021		$	5,022		$	—		$	4,614		$	64
Other commercial real estate			4,018			4,181			—			4,317			386
		$	9,039		$	9,203		$	—		$	8,931		$	450
Cash basis interest income															415

	Impaired Financing Receivables
	At June 30, 2017						Year ended June 30, 2017
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential	$	3,684	$	3,684	$	—	$	3,655	$	146
Other commercial real estate		9,635		9,635		—		8,848		560
		13,319		13,319		—		12,503		706
With an allowance recorded:
Other commercial real estate	$	495	$	538	$	43	$	554	$	—
		495		538		43		554		—
Total:
Residential	$	3,684	$	3,684	$	—	$	3,655	$	146
Other commercial real estate		10,130		10,173		43		9,402		560
	$	13,814	$	13,857	$	43	$	13,057	$	706
Cash basis interest income										611

Troubled debt restructured loans ("TDRs") are those loans whose terms have been modified because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. The Company has selectively modified certain borrower's loans to enable the borrower to emerge from delinquency and keep their loans current. The eligibility of a borrower for a TDR modification depends upon the facts and circumstances of each transaction, which may change from period to period, and involve judgment by management regarding the likelihood that the modification will result in the maximum recovery by the Company. Modifications could include extension of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and forgiveness of accrued interest and/or principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured until paid in full or, if the obligation yields a market rate (a rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a six month period. Management classifies all TDRs as impaired loans. Included in impaired loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are $1.9 million and $4.6 million, respectively, of loans which are deemed TDRs.

The following table presents additional information regarding the Company's TDRs as of June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Troubled Debt Restructurings at June 30, 2018
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	—	$	174	$	174
Other commercial real estate		309		1,407		1,716
Total	$	309	$	1,581	$	1,890
Allowance	$	—	$	—	$	—
	Troubled Debt Restructurings at June 30, 2017
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	—	$	178	$	178
Other commercial real estate		362		4,070		4,432
Total	$	362	$	4,248	$	4,610
Allowance	$	—	$	43	$	43

The following tables summarize loans that were modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.  The pre-modification and post-modification outstanding recorded investments disclosed in the table below represent the loan carrying amounts immediately prior to the modification and the carrying amounts at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

	Year ended June 30, 2018
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	1	$	271	$	249
Total	$	1	$	271	$	249

	Year ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	2	$	1,252	$	1,167
Total	$	2	$	1,252	$	1,167

	Year Ended June 30, 2016
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	1	$	3,385	$	2,266
Total	$	1	$	3,385	$	2,266

The relationship modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, was restructured from interest only to a principal and interest amortizing loan through maturity in conjunction with a principal paydown from the borrower. Of the relationships modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2017, one relationship was modified to provide interest only payments through maturity and the other relationship was granted a reduced rate. The relationship modified during the twelve months ended June 30, 2016 was granted an extended maturity in conjunction with a principal paydown from the borrower.

The identification of troubled debt restructured loans did not have a significant impact on the allowance for loan losses. In addition, there were no charge-offs as a result of the classication of these loans as troubled debt restructuring during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. There were no payment defaults on loans modified as troubled debt restructurings within twelve months of modification during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

XML

Securities Held for Maturity

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Securities Held for Maturity [Abstract]

Securities Held for Maturity

(6) Securities Held to Maturity

The following is a comparative summary of securities held to maturity at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

			June 30, 2018
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
Due in less than one year	$	1,750	$	—	$	23	$	1,727
Due in one to five years		5,000		—		94		4,906
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		220,057		23		5,965		214,115
Commercial MBS		13,035		—		421		12,614
CMO		85,488		35		2,398		83,125
Corporate Note
Due in five to ten years		10,044		—		20		10,024
	$	335,374	$	58	$	8,921	$	326,511

			June 30, 2017
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
Due in one to five years	$	6,750	$	—	$	54	$	6,696
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		141,990		81		1,391		140,680
Commercial MBS		13,473		112		83		13,502
CMO		77,418		—		1,092		76,326
	$	239,631	$	193	$	2,620	$	237,204

The contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity generally exceed 20 years; however, the effective lives are expected to be shorter due to anticipated prepayments and, in the case of CMOs, cash flow priorities.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.

The Company did not sell any securities held to maturity during the year ended 2018. Proceeds from the sale of  securities held to maturity for the year ended June 30, 2017 were $2.0 million on securities with an amortized cost of $1.9 million, resulting in gross gains of $57,000. There were no gross losses for the year ended June 30, 2017.  The Company did not sell any securities held to maturity during the year ended June 30, 2016. The held to maturity securities sold had less than 15% of their original par remaining at the time of the sale. The Company did not record other than temporary impairment charges on securities held to maturity during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Securities with fair values of $9.1 million and $27.2 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were pledged as collateral for advances. There were no fair value of securities held to maturity pledged as collateral for cash flow hedge interest rate swaps at June 30, 2018. The fair value of securities held to maturity pledged as collateral for cash flow hedge interest rate swaps totaled $8.5 million at June 30, 2017. There were no held to maturity securities pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2018, as the company arranged for a municipal deposit letter of credit from the FHLBNY to collateralize our municipal deposits in the amount of $217.0 million. Held to maturity securities with fair values of $132.5 million were pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2017.

Gross unrealized losses on securities held to maturity and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	June 30, 2018
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value			Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations		$	—	$	—	$	6,633	$	117	$	6,633	$	117
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			188,281		4,646		24,712		1,319		212,993		5,965
Commercial MBS			8,290		224		4,324		197		12,614		421
CMO			9,106		279		48,211		2,119		57,317		2,398
Corporate Note			10,024		20		—		—		10,024		20
		$	215,701	$	5,169	$	83,880	$	3,752	$	299,581	$	8,921

	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value			Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations		$	1,737	$	13	$	4,959	$	41	$	6,696	$	54
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			128,040		1,265		3,020		126		131,060		1,391
Commercial MBS			7,120		83		—		—		7,120		83
CMO			76,326		1,092		—		—		76,326		1,092
		$	213,223	$	2,453	$	7,979	$	167	$	221,202	$	2,620

Management evaluated the securities in the above tables and concluded that none of the securities with losses has impairments that are other-than-temporary. The unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate changes and market conditions. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has no intent to sell and believes it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

XML

Securities Available for Sale

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Securities Available for Sale [Abstract]

Securities Available for Sale

(7) Securities Available for Sale

The following is a comparative summary of securities available for sale at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

	June 30, 2018
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	601	$	964	$	—	$	1,565
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		70		1		—		71
Commercial MBS		4,074		63		—		4,137
CMO		40,106		—		1,188		38,918
	$	44,851	$	1,028	$	1,188	$	44,691

	June 30, 2017
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	601	$	897	$	—	$	1,498
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		6,974		9		62		6,921
Commercial MBS		4,220		186		—		4,406
CMO		85,437		152		484		85,105
	$	97,232	$	1,244	$	546	$	97,930

The contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities available for sale generally exceed 20 years; however, the effective lives are expected to be shorter due to anticipated prepayments and, in the case of CMOs, cash flow priorities. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalties.

Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale for the year June 30, 2018 were $29.5 million on securities with an amortized cost of $29.8 million, resulting in gross losses of $324,000. Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale for the year June 30, 2017 were $55.1 million on securities with an amortized cost of $56.0 million, resulting in gross gains and gross losses of $28,000 and $911,000, respectively.  Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale for the year June 30, 2016 were $100.5 million on securities with an amortized cost of $99.5 million, resulting in gross gains and gross losses of $993,000 and $3,000, respectively. There were no impairment charges on available for sale securities for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016.  The Equity securities caption relates to holdings of shares in financial institutions common stock.  Available for sale securities with fair values of $15.5 million and $31.6 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were pledged as collateral for advances.  There were no securities available for sale pledged as collateral for cash flow hedge interest rate swaps at June 30, 2018 and 2017. There were no available for sale securities pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2018, as the Company arranged for a municipal deposit letter of credit from the FHLBNY  to collateralize our municipal deposits  in the amount of $217.0 million. Available for sale securities with fair values of $59.5 million were pledged for municipal deposits at June 30, 2017.

Gross unrealized losses on securities available for sale and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 were as follows:

	June 30, 2018
	Less than 12 months				Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities:
CMO	$	20,651	$	444	$	18,267	$	744	$	38,918	$	1,188
	$	20,651	$	444	$	18,267	$	744	$	38,918	$	1,188

	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 months				Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		6,521		62		—		—		6,521		62
CMO		53,880		406		4,877		78		58,757		484
	$	60,401	$	468	$	4,877	$	78	$	65,278	$	546

Management evaluated the securities in the above tables and concluded that none of the securities with losses has impairments that are other-than-temporary. The unrealized losses on investments in mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate changes and market conditions. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and market conditions and not credit quality, and because the Company has no intent to sell and believes it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

XML

Accrued Interest Receivable

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Accrued Interest Receivable [Abstract]

Accrued Interest Receivable

(8) Accrued Interest Receivable

A summary of accrued interest receivable at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Mortgage Loans	$	10,446	$	9,976
Investment Securities		815		644
	$	11,261	$	10,620

XML

Office Properties and Equipment

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Office Properties and Equipment [Abstract]

Office Properties and Equipment

(9) Office Properties and Equipment

At June 30, 2018 and 2017, office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, consist of the following:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cost:
Land	$	4,171	$	4,171
Buildings		10,073		10,073
Land and building improvements		5,698		5,470
Leasehold improvements		1,763		1,754
Furniture and equipment		6,282		6,451
Construction in progress		50		248
		28,037		28,167
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		14,582		14,258
Office properties and equipment, net	$	13,455	$	13,909

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 amounted to $810,000, $864,000 and $910,000, respectively.

At June 30, 2018, the Company and the Bank conducted business from its corporate headquarters in Washington Township, New Jersey, its lending offices in New York City and Cherry Hill, New Jersey and 25 full service branch offices located in Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic counties, New Jersey.

XML

Deposits

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Deposits [Abstract]

Deposits

(10) Deposits

Deposits include checking (non-interest and interest-bearing demand deposits), money market, savings and time deposits. At June 30, 2018 and 2017, we had brokered deposits totaling $450.4 million and $510.4 million, respectively. We had no brokered time deposits at June 30, 2018. At  June 30, 2017, brokered deposits include brokered time deposits totaling $38.9 million having weighted average interest rate of 1.34%.  The brokered time deposits had weighted average maturity of 0.1 years at June 30, 2017.

Deposit balances are summarized as follows:

	2018					2017
	Amount		Weighted average cost			Amount		Weighted average cost
	(Dollars in thousands)
Checking accounts	$	751,735		0.85	%	$	706,554		0.62	%
Money market deposit accounts		763,003		1.13	%		847,888		1.05	%
Savings accounts		188,859		0.28	%		177,896		0.23	%
Time deposits		1,211,531		1.62	%		1,124,140		1.34	%
	$	2,915,128		1.21	%	$	2,856,478		1.01	%

Interest expense on deposits for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows:

	2018		2017		2016
	(In thousands)
Checking accounts	$	4,955	$	3,015	$	1,666
Money market deposit accounts		9,038		7,742		5,034
Savings accounts		455		391		380
Time deposits		17,176		13,523		10,804
	$	31,624	$	24,671	$	17,884

Time deposits at June 30, 2018 mature as follows (in thousands):

Year ending June 30:
2019	$	781,699
2020		280,465
2021		69,340
2022		66,912
2023 and beyond		13,115
	$	1,211,531

Included in time deposits at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is $244.7 million and $221.8 million, respectively, of deposits of $250,000 and over.

XML

Income Taxes

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

(11) Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 consists of the following:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	18,153		$	24,641		$	24,145
State		4,200			2,723			4,160
Total current		22,353			27,364			28,305
Deferred:
Federal		11,061			(776	)		765
State		(2,298	)		(206	)		(536	)
Total deferred		8,763			(982	)		229
Total income tax expense	$	31,116		$	26,382		$	28,534

A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected amount (computed by multiplying income before provision for income taxes times the applicable statutory federal income tax rate) for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Income before provision for income taxes	$	74,010		$	75,526		$	80,829
Applicable statutory federal income tax rate		28	%		35	%		35	%
Computed "expected" federal income tax expense		20,723			26,434			28,290
Increase (decrease) in federal income tax expense resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		2,339			1,636			2,356
Bank owned life insurance		(698	)		(916	)		(951	)
ESOP fair market value adjustment		484			723			733
ESOP unallocated dividend		(631	)		(455	)		(403	)
Non-deductible compensation		—			146			194
Stock based compensation		(1,122	)		(1,430	)		(2,118	)
Impact of tax reform		10,165			—			—
Other items, net		(144	)		244			433
Total income tax expense	$	31,116		$	26,382		$	28,534

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act").  Among numerous provisions included in the Act was the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Because the Company has a fiscal year end of June 30, the reduced corporate tax rate will result in the application of a blended federal statutory tax rate of 28% for its fiscal year 2018. Applying the blended statutory tax rate to the results for the September 30, 2017 quarterly period resulted in a $1.3 million reduction being recognized in the December 31, 2017 quarterly period.

While the Act will lower the Company's future tax rate, in accordance with ASC 740 companies are required to re-measure deferred tax balances using the new enacted tax rates to account for the future impact of lower corporate tax rates on these deferred amounts.  The Company re-measured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future. The tax expense recorded in the December 31, 2017 quarterly period relating to the remeasurement of the Company's deferred tax balances is $10.2 million. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Act and refining calculations, which could potentially affect the re-measurement of these balances.  The future impact of the Act may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, assumptions made, the issuance of additional guidance, and actions we may take as a result of the Act.

The effective tax rates for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were 42.04%, 34.93% and 35.30%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2018 was elevated due to adjustments necessitated by the Act. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  As a result of the new guidance, excess tax benefits from exercise or vesting of share-based awards are now included as a reduction in income tax expense, as discrete items, in the period in which the exercise or vesting occurs.  This impacts the effective tax rate in each reporting period; however, these discrete items are not included in the projected annual effective tax rate calculation.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan and real estate owned losses	$	8,589	$	12,101
Postretirement benefits		10,242		13,973
Accrued/deferred compensation		7,554		9,598
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released		875		1,211
Stock compensation		1,914		3,772
Other than temporary loss on securities		64		96
State net operating loss carry forward		1,704		373
Other		494		271
Total deferred tax asset		31,436		41,395
Deferred tax liabilities:
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		—		301
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap		5,158		2,776
Other		414		625
Total deferred tax liabilities		5,572		3,702
Net deferred tax asset	$	25,864	$	37,693

Sources of deferred taxes for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were due primarily to the difference in recognizing income and expenses for book purposes and tax purposes for various deferred loan fees, unrealized gains and losses on financial assets, uncollected interest on loans, accrued benefit costs, and book and tax depreciation.

At June 30, 2018, there are approximately $24.0 million of state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income.  If not utilized, these carryforwards will begin to expire in 2036.  Based upon projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the net deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these deductible differences and loss carryforwards and, therefore, has not established a valuation allowance.

At June 30, 2018, retained earnings includes approximately $15.1 million for which no provision for income tax has been made.  This amount represents an allocation of income to bad debt deductions for tax purposes only.  Under ASC 740, this amount is treated as a permanent difference and deferred taxes are not recognized unless it appears that it will be reduced and result in taxable income in the foreseeable future. Events that would result in taxation of these reserves include failure to qualify as a bank for tax purposes, distributions in complete or partial liquidation, stock redemptions and excess distributions to shareholders.  At June 30, 2018, the Company had an unrecognized tax liability of $4.5 million with respect to this reserve.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits, where applicable, in income tax expense.  The Company did not have any material uncertain tax positions for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and in New Jersey, and New York city and state jurisdictions.  The Company is no longer subject to federal and state income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2014. The Company's federal return for the tax year ended December 31, 2015 is currently under audit. The Company's New York state tax return for the tax years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 was audited during fiscal year 2018. The completion of the examination did not have a material impact on the Company's effective income tax rate. The accrual of these audit settlements marginally increased fiscal year 2018 tax expense and effective tax rate.

XML

Borrowings

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Borrowings [Abstract]

Borrowings

(12) Borrowings

As of June 30, 2018, we had total borrowings in the amount of $596.4 million with an estimated weighted average maturity of 2.4 years and a weighted average rate of 1.9%.  As of June 30, 2017, we had total borrowings in the amount of $642.1 million with an estimated weighted average maturity of 3.2 years and a weighted average rate of 1.6%. Borrowings primarily consist of advances from the FHLB and, to a lesser extent, advances from other financial institutions.  All of the borrowings at June 30, 2018 and 2017 were fixed rate, non-amortizing interest only borrowings.  The following table presents borrowings as of June 30, 2018 by stated maturity:

	Stated Maturity
Year ending June 30:
2019	$	193,735
2020		97,418
2021		99,648
2022		110,650
2023		58,426
2025		36,495
	$	596,372

At June 30, 2018, borrowings are secured by mortgage-backed securities and investment securities with a book value of $24.9 million and performing mortgage loans with an outstanding balance of $2.84 billion. The fair value of mortgage-backed securities and investment securities pledged as collateral for borrowings were $24.6 million and $58.8 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. At June 30, 2018, the Company had additional borrowing capacity of $898.9 million with the FHLB.

XML

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Derivatives and Hedging Activities [Abstract]

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

(13) Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Oritani is exposed to certain risks regarding its ongoing business operations. Derivative instruments are used to offset a portion of the Company's interest rate risk. Specifically, the Company has utilized interest rate swaps to partially offset the interest rate risk inherent in the Company's balance sheet. Oritani recognizes interest rate swaps as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial condition with an offset recorded in Other Comprehensive Income and any ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings. The interest rate swaps have been designed as cash flow hedges.

Oritani is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the agreements. Oritani controls the credit risk through monitoring procedures and does not expect the counterparty to fail their obligations. Oritani only deals with primary dealers and believes that the credit risk inherent in these contracts was not significant during and at period end. Oritani has the right to demand that the counterparty post collateral to cover any market value shortfall of the counterparty regarding the transaction.

At June 30, 2018, Oritani had entered into twenty three interest rate swap agreements with a total notional outstanding of $405.0 million. These agreements all feature exchanges of fixed for variable payments covering various hedging periods maturing between July 2, 2018 and June 26, 2025.   The Company is paying fixed rates on these swaps ranging from 0.59% to 1.90%, in exchange for receiving variable payments linked to one month LIBOR.

The following table presents information regarding our derivative financial instruments at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

		At June 30, 2018					At June 30, 2017
Balance Sheet Line Item		Notional Amount			Fair Value		Notional Amount			Fair Value
Cash flow hedge interest rate swaps
Gross unrealized gain	Other Assets	$	405,000		$	16,789	$	450,000		$	6,437
Gross notional / net fair value		$	405,000		$	16,789	$	450,000		$	6,437
Average rate paid for the year ended			1.96	%				1.26	%
Average rate received for the year ended			2.06	%				0.72	%
Weighted average maturity (in years)			3.9					5.4

The amounts recognized in interest expense related to cash flow hedge ineffectiveness were immaterial for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. There were no accumulated net after-tax losses related to effective cash flow hedges in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2018 and 2017.  We had no securities pledged as collateral for the swaps at June 30, 2018. The fair value of securities pledged as collateral for the swaps at June 30, 2017 was $8.5 million.

Gains (losses) included in the consolidated statements of income and in comprehensive income, on a pre-tax basis, related to cash flow hedge interest rate swaps are as follows:

	Year ended June 30,
	2018		2017
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense	$	133	$	(2,523	)
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income		10,485		13,297
Amount of loss recognized in the consolidated statements of income		—		(7,670	)

XML

Employee Benefit Plans

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Employee Benefit Plans [Abstract]

Employee Benefit Plans

(14) Employee Benefit Plans

The Company is a participant in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions ("Pentegra DB Plan"), a tax-qualified defined-benefit pension plan.  The Pentegra DB Plan's Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the Plan Number is 333. The Pentegra DB Plan is a multiple-employer plan. Accordingly, under the Pentegra DB Plan contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide benefits to participants of other participating employers. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place that require contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan.

The Pentegra DB Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2008. Full time employees whom attained age 21 and completed one year of service were eligible to participate in this plan. Retirement benefits are based upon a formula utilizing years of service and average compensation, as defined. Participants were vested 100% upon the completion of 5 years of service.

The funded status (fair value of the plan assets divided by funding target) as of July 1, 2017 and 2016 was 116.4% and 108.1%, respectively. The fair value of plan assets reflects any contributions received through June 30, 2017. The Company's contributions for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $500,000, $500,000 and $500,000, respectively. The Company's contributions to the Pentegra DB Plan are not more than 5% of the total contributions to the plan.

The Company has a savings incentive plan covering substantially all employees of the Company. Contributions are currently made by the Company in an amount equal to 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions. The contribution percentage is determined annually by the Board of Directors. Company contributions for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $223,000, $219,000 and $193,000, respectively.

The Company has a nonqualified savings incentive plan covering certain eligible employees whose salary deferrals to the savings incentive plan are limited. Contributions to the nonqualified savings incentive plan are currently made by the Company in an amount equal to 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions to this plan with interest calculated at the greater of 9% or the Citibank prime rate of interest. For the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, interest was calculated at 9%. Interest expenses for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $1,098,000, $974,000 and $820,000, respectively. The contribution percentage is determined annually by the Board of Directors. The deferrals and contributions are payable, with interest, at a future date. Until these payments are made, the obligations to the employees are a general liability of the Company. Company contributions for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $115,000, $135,000 and $190,000, respectively. The total obligation under the nonqualified savings incentive plan that existed as of June 30, 2018, and 2017 was $13.1 million and $11.8 million, respectively.

The Company has a nonqualified Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP Plan) which provides benefits to employees who are disallowed certain benefits under the Company's qualified benefit plans. The Company recorded expenses associated with the BEP Plan of $80,000, $91,000 and $88,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company has a nonqualified Directors' Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan). The Retirement Plan provides eligible directors an annual retirement benefit based on the monthly meeting fee at the time of the director's retirement, death, disability or a change in control. The Company recorded expenses of $338,000, $333,000 and $430,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the Retirement Plan.

During 1999, the Company adopted a Post Retirement Medical Plan (the Medical Plan) for directors and certain eligible employees. The Medical Plan provides a medical retirement benefit at a cost to the Company limited to two times the premium at the time of the participant's retirement. Participants are required to contribute to the plan for excess premiums above the limitation. The Company recorded expenses of $270,000, $641,000 and $467,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the Medical Plan.

During 2000, the Company adopted a Deferred Director's Fee Plan (the Deferred Fee Plan) for outside directors of the Company. Under the Deferred Fee Plan, directors may elect to defer the receipt of their board and committee fees. The fees are payable, with interest, at a predetermined future date. Interest is calculated at the greater of 9% or the Citibank prime rate of interest. For the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, interest was calculated at 9%. Interest expenses for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were $884,000, $791,000 and $694,000, respectively. Until these payments are made, the obligations to the directors are a general liability of the Company. The total obligation under the Deferred Fee Plan that existed as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $10.4 million and $9.4 million, respectively.

The following table sets forth information regarding the BEP Plan, the Retirement Plan and the Medical Plan at June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands).

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan						Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of the year	$	1,386		$	1,388		$	5,858		$	5,756		$	5,567		$	6,583
Service cost		—			—			130			151			59			57
Interest cost		45			39			208			182			211			234
Actuarial (gain) loss		(25	)		(41	)		(518	)		(168	)		41			(1,273	)
Benefits paid		—			—			(90	)		(63	)		(76	)		(34	)
Discount rate change		—			—			—			—			—			—
Projected benefit obligation at end of the year	$	1,406		$	1,386		$	5,588		$	5,858		$	5,802		$	5,567
Reconciliation of plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		—			—			—			—			—			—
Employer contributions		—			—			90			63			76			34
Benefits paid		—			—			(90	)		(63	)		(76	)		(34	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of the year	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Unfunded status at end of year	$	1,406		$	1,386		$	5,588		$	5,858		$	5,802		$	5,567

The unfunded BEP of $1.4 million and $1.4 million, Retirement Plan of $5.6 million and $5.9 million and Medical Plan of $5.8 million and $5.6 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017 respectively, are included in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income related to pension and other postretirement benefits, on a pre-tax basis, at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are summarized in the following table (in thousands).

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan							Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2018				2017			2018			2017
Net actuarial loss/(gain)		$	238		$	299		$	(308	)		$	210		$	461		$	420
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income		$	238		$	299		$	(308	)		$	210		$	461		$	420

Net periodic benefit costs for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, as well as costs that are expected to be amortized into expense in fiscal 2019, are presented in the following table.

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan						Medical Plan
	2018		2017		2016		2018		2017		2016		2018		2017		2016
	(In thousands)
Service cost	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	130	$	151	$	174	$	59	$	57	$	77
Interest cost		45		39		48		208		182		227		211		234		235
Amortization of unrecognized:
Net loss		35		52		40		—		—		29		—		350		155
Total	$	80	$	91	$	88	$	338	$	333	$	430	$	270	$	641	$	467
Amounts expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2019:
Net loss		33						—						—
	$	33					$	—					$	—

The weighted average actuarial assumptions used in the plan determinations at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

	BEP Plan									Retirement Plan									Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016
Discount Rate		3.84	%		3.34	%		2.94	%		4.01	%		3.65	%		3.23	%		4.09	%		3.82	%		3.58	%
Rate of compensation increase		—			—			—			2.25	%		2.25	%		2.00	%		—			—			—
Medical benefits cost rate of increase		—			—			—			—			—			—			5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%

Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are as follows (in thousands):

	BEP Plan		Retirement Plan		Medical Plan
2019	$	110	$	303	$	173
2020		110		302		243
2021		111		300		267
2022		111		297		267
2023		111		294		265
2024-2028		558		1,807		1,424

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects on post-retirement benefits (in thousands):

	1% increase		1% decrease
Effect on total service cost and interest cost	$	318		(231	)
Effect on post retirement benefits obligation	$	987		(785	)

During 2005, the Company adopted an Executive Supplemental Retirement Income Agreement (the SERP) for the President/CEO of the Company.  The SERP provides a retirement benefit to the executive with a minimum payment period of 20 years upon his death, disability, normal retirement, early retirement or separation from service after a change in control. The SERP benefit is equal to 70% of the executive's average annual pre-retirement base salary and bonus, reduced by the benefits due to the executive through certain other benefit plans. The Company recorded expenses of $591,000, $1,219,000 and $1,492,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the SERP.  The SERP is unfunded, and an accrued liability of $11.4 million and $10.8 million was recorded for this plan as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The Company invests in bank owned life insurance ("BOLI") to help offset the cost of employee benefits. BOLI involves the purchasing of life insurance by the Company on a chosen group of employees with the Company as owner and beneficiary of the policies. BOLI is recorded at its cash surrender value and is classified as a non-interest earning asset. Increases in the carrying value, other than purchases, are recorded as non-interest income. At June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company had $98.4 million and $95.9 million, respectively, in BOLI. Income earned on BOLI was $2.5 million, $2.6 million and $2.7 million for each of the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively and is exempt from federal and state income taxes as long as the policies are held until the death of the insured individuals.

The Company has a nonqualified Executive Group Life Insurance Replacement Plan ("Split-Dollar") which provides life insurance benefits to certain eligible employees upon death while employed by the Company and upon death following termination of employment due to disability, retirement or change in control. Participants in the plan are entitled to up to two times their base annual salary, as defined by the plan. The Company recorded expenses of $105,000, $104,000 and $72,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the Split-Dollar Plan. The accrued liability recorded for this plan as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $882,000 and $777,000, respectively.

XML

Stock Based Compensation

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Stock Based Compensation [Abstract]

Stock Based Compensation

(15) Stock Based Compensation

Employee Stock Ownership Plan

During 2006, the Company adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ESOP). The ESOP is a tax-qualified plan designed to invest primarily in the Company's common stock. The ESOP provides employees with the opportunity to receive a funded retirement benefit from the Bank, based primarily on the value of the Company's common stock. The ESOP purchased 2,384,466 shares of the Company's common stock in the Company's initial public offering at a price of $6.67  per share. In 2010, the ESOP refinanced the outstanding principal and interest balance on the original ESOP loan and purchased additional shares, in the open market, of 1,654,529 in conjunction with the Company's second step transaction at an average price of $10.36 during June 2010. The refinancing and new stock purchases were funded with a loan from the Company to the ESOP. The outstanding loan balance at June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $19.7 million and $21.4 million, respectively. The shares of Company's common stock purchased are pledged as collateral for the loan. Shares are released from the pledge for allocation to participants as loan payments are made. At June 30, 2018, shares allocated to participants were 1,957,114 since the plan inception and shares committed to be released were 168,152. Shares that are committed to be released will be allocated to participants at the end of the plan year (December 31). ESOP shares that were unallocated or not yet committed to be released totaled 1,913,728 at June 30, 2018 and had a fair value of $31.0 million. ESOP compensation expense for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $3.5 million, $4.1 million and $4.4 million, respectively, representing the fair market value of shares allocated or committed to be released during the year.

The Company has also established an ESOP restoration plan and trust, which are non-qualified plans that provide supplemental benefits to certain executives who are prevented from receiving the full benefits contemplated by the employee stock ownership plan's benefit formula. The supplemental benefits consist of payments representing shares that cannot be allocated to participants under the ESOP due to legal limitations imposed on tax-qualified plans. Compensation expense related to this plan amounts to $665,000, $547,000, and $630,000 million, for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. The total obligation under the restoration plan as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $8.4 million and $8.2 million, respectively. The obligations to the executives are a general liability of the Company.

Equity Incentive Plan

The 2007 Equity Incentive Plan ("the 2007 Equity Plan") was approved by the Company's stockholders on April 22, 2008, which authorized the issuance of up to 4,172,817 shares of Company common stock pursuant to grants of incentive and non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock awards. The 2011 Equity Incentive Plan ("2011 Equity Plan") was approved by the Company's stockholders on July 26, 2011. The 2011 Equity Plan authorized the issuance of up to 5,790,849 shares of the Company's common stock pursuant to grants of stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units, with no more than 1,654,528 of the shares be issued as restricted stock awards or restricted stock units. Employees and outside directors of the Company or Oritani Bank are eligible to receive awards under the Equity Plans.

On August 18, 2011, certain officers and employees of the Company were granted in aggregate 3,033,750 stock options and 1,227,100 shares of restricted stock, and non-employee directors received in aggregate 932,500 stock options and 373,000 shares of restricted stock.

We recognize stock based compensation expense based on the grant-date fair value of those awards and options over the requisite service period in accordance with ASU16-09.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  As a result of the new guidance, excess tax benefits from exercise or vesting of share-based awards are included as a reduction in income tax expense in the period in which the exercise or vesting occurs and are presented as cash flows from operating activities.  Previously, excess tax benefits were recorded in additional paid-in capital and included as a cash inflow from financing activities.  Excess tax benefits recognized as a reduction of income tax expense for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016 totaled $1.1 million, $1.4 million and $2.1 million respectively.  The Company classified share-based compensation for employees and outside directors within "compensation, payroll taxes and benefits" in the consolidated statements of income to correspond with the same line item as the cash compensation paid.

Stock options are granted at an exercise price equal to the market price of our common stock on the grant date, based on quoted market prices.  Stock options generally vest over a five-year service period and expire ten years from issuance.  The vesting of the options accelerate upon death or disability, retirement or a change in control and expire 90 days after termination of service, excluding disability or retirement. The Company recognizes compensation expense for all option grants over the awards' respective requisite service periods.  The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.  Management estimated the fair values of all option grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The volatility rate used in the estimation of fair value was based on the historical volatility of the Company's stock for the appropriate period.  Management estimated the expected life of the options using the simplified method.  The Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant provides the risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option.  The Company classified share-based compensation for employees and outside directors within "compensation, payroll taxes and benefits" in the consolidated statements of income to correspond with the same line item as the cash compensation paid.

The fair value of the options issued during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were estimated using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following assumptions:

	2018	2017	2016
Option shares granted	70,000	20,000	20,000
Expected dividend yield	7.18%	5.35%	6.75%
Expected volatility	18.74%	20.81%	26.10%
Risk-free interest rate	2.75%	1.39%	2.03%
Expected option life	6.50	6.50	6.50

The Company recorded $41,000, $319,000 million and $2.1 million of share based compensation expense related to the options shares for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Expected future expense related to the non-vested options outstanding at June 30, 2018 is $91,000 over a weighted average period of 4.0 years.  Upon exercise of vested options, management expects to draw on treasury stock as the source of the shares.

The following is a summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for its options plan as of June 30, 2018 and changes therein during the year then ended:

	Number of Stock Options			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
Outstanding at  June 30, 2017		3,729,033		$	2.59	$	11.70		3.4
Granted		70,000			0.89		15.40		10.0
Exercised		(1,123,738	)		2.39		10.79		1.1
Forfeited		(12,000	)		1.64		15.89		7.8
Expired		(63,432	)		2.27		11.36		1.6
Outstanding at  June 30, 2018		2,599,863		$	2.64	$	12.16		3.4
Exercisable at  June 30, 2018		2,501,464		$	2.70	$	12.05		3.2

Restricted stock shares vest over a five-year service period on the anniversary date of the grant. Vesting of the restricted stock shares accelerate upon death or disability, retirement or a change in control. The product of the number of shares granted and the grant date market price of the Company's common stock determines the fair value of restricted shares under the Company's restricted stock plan. The Company recognizes compensation expense for the fair value of restricted shares on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

The following is a summary of the status of the Company's restricted stock shares as of June 30, 2018 and changes therein during the year then ended:

	Number of Shares Awarded			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at June 30, 2017		35,934		$	15.60
Granted		—			—
Vested		(15,734	)		15.33
Forfeited		(6,000	)		15.89
Non-vested at June 30, 2018		14,200		$	15.78

The Company recorded $137,000, $685,000 and $3.9 million for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of share based compensation expense related to the restricted stock share.  Expected future expense related to the non-vested restricted shares at June 30, 2018 is $203,000 over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.

XML

Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Commitments and Contingencies

(16) Commitments and Contingencies

In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain contractual obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for premises and equipment. Certain facilities are occupied under long-term operating leases which expire on various dates. Certain leases also provide for renewal options. Total rent expense was $929,000, $918,000 and $836,000 for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Aggregate minimum lease payments for the remainder of the leases are as follows (in thousands):

Year ending June 30:
2019	$	769
2020		652
2021		521
2022		237
2023		158
Thereafter		34
	$	2,371

There were no outstanding commitments to purchase securities at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

In the normal course of business, the Company may be a party to various outstanding legal proceedings and claims.  As of the date of this report, management is aware of no legal proceedings or claims which involve the reasonable possibility that a loss to the Company may have been incurred.  Further, there have been no asserted claims that would materially affect the Company's operations or financial position should the Company be considered liable under the claim.

XML

Regulatory Capital Requirements

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Regulatory Capital Requirements [Abstract]

Regulatory Capital Requirements

(17) Regulatory Capital Requirements

Deposits at the Bank are insured up to standard limits of coverage provided by the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) of the FDIC. The Bank is a New Jersey state chartered savings bank and is subject to comprehensive regulation, supervision and periodic examinations by the FDIC and by the NJDOBI. The Company is regulated by the FRB.

FDIC regulations require banks to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital.  Under the regulations in effect at June 30, 2018, the Bank and the Company are required to maintain (a) a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total adjusted assets of 4.0%, and (b) minimum ratios of common equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 6.0% and 8.0%, respectively.

Under its prompt corrective action regulations, the FDIC is required to take certain supervisory actions (and may take additional discretionary actions) with respect to an undercapitalized institution. Such actions could have a direct material effect on the institution's financial statements. The regulations establish a framework for the classification of savings banks into five categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. Generally, an institution is considered well capitalized if it has a leverage (Tier 1) capital ratio of at least 5.0%; a common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets ratio of 6.5% or more; a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 8.0%; and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%.

On January 1, 2015, a final rule issued by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the other federal bank regulatory agencies became effective which revised their leverage and risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other things, the rule established a new common equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets), adopted a uniform minimum leverage capital ratio of 4%, increased the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets) and assigned a higher risk weight (150%) to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and to certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The final rule also requires unrealized gains and losses on certain "available-for-sale" securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital unless a one-time opt-out is exercised and requires more stringent treatment of mortgage servicing assets and certain deferred tax assets. The rule limits a banking organization's capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a "capital conservation buffer" consisting of 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer requirement is being phased in beginning January 1, 2016 and ending January 1, 2019, when the full capital conservation buffer requirement will be effective.  The capital conservation buffer for 2018 is 1.875%.

The foregoing capital ratios are based in part on specific quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the FDIC about capital components, risk weightings and other factors.

Management believes that, as of June 30, 2018, the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject. Further, the most recent FDIC notification categorized the Bank as a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective action regulations. There have been no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's capital classification.

The following is a summary of the Company's actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, compared to the FRB minimum capital adequacy requirements.

	June 30, 2018
	Actual						Required
	Amount			Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)		$	548,122		14.82	%	$	166,458		4.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)			548,122		14.82			221,945		6.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)			578,685		15.64			295,926		8.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)			548,122		13.25			165,465		4.00
Capital conservation buffer			282,759		7.64			69,358		1.875

	June 30, 2017
	Actual					Required
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	555,703		15.02	%	$	166,443		4.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		555,703		15.02			221,924		6.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		585,975		15.84			295,898		8.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		555,703		13.51			164,562		4.00
Capital conservation buffer		290,077		7.84			46,234		1.250

The following is a summary of the Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, compared to the FDIC minimum capital adequacy requirements and the FDIC requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution.

	June 30, 2018
	Actual					Required					Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	470,857		12.73	%	$	166,431		4.50	%	$	240,401		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		470,857		12.73			221,908		6.00			295,878		8.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		501,419		13.56			295,878		8.00			369,847		10.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		470,857		11.38			165,438		4.00			206,797		5.00
Capital conservation buffer		205,541		5.56			69,346		1.875

	June 30, 2017
	Actual					Required					Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	521,414		14.10	%	$	166,440		4.50	%	$	240,413		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		521,414		14.10			221,919		6.00			295,893		8.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		551,686		14.92			295,893		8.00			369,866		10.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		521,414		12.68			164,533		4.00			205,666		5.00
Capital conservation buffer		255,793		6.92			46,233		1.250

XML

Fair Value Measurements

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements

(18) Fair Value Measurements

The Company adopted ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", on July 1, 2008. Under ASC 820, fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are described below:

Basis of Fair Value Measurement:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Price or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).

A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies and key inputs used to measure assets recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. The descriptions include an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value.

Securities

The Company records securities held to maturity at amortized cost and securities available for sale at fair value on a recurring basis. The majority of the Company's securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets. The fair values for securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized third-party pricing service. Our independent pricing service provides us with prices which are primarily categorized as Level 2, as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are generally not available for the majority of securities in our portfolio. Pricing services may employ modeling techniques in determining pricing. Inputs to these models include market spreads, dealer quotes, prepayment speeds, credit information and the instrument's terms and conditions, among other things. Management compares the pricing to a second independent pricing source for reasonableness. Equity securities are reported at Level 1 based on quoted market prices for identical securities in active markets.

FHLB of New York Stock

FHLB of New York Stock is recorded at cost (par value) and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. There is no active market for this stock and no significant observable market data is available for this instrument. The Company considers the profitability and asset quality of FHLB, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience, when determining the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The Company believes its investment in FHLB stock is recoverable at par.  It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on the stock's transferability.  The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates fair value, since this is the amount for which it could be redeemed.

Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, periodically, the Company records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements. The fair value for significant nonperforming loans and impaired loans are valued utilizing independent appraisals of the collateral securing such loans that rely upon quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience. The appraisals are adjusted downward by management (0-20% adjustment rate and 0-10% risk premium rate), as necessary, for changes in relevant valuation factors subsequent to the appraisal date and the timing of anticipated cash flows (0-8% discount rate). The Company classifies impaired loans as Level 3.

Fair value for loans held for investment is estimated using portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential, residential CRE, grocery/credit retail CRE, other CRE, and construction and land. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming/impaired categories. Fair value of performing loans is estimated using a discounted cash flow model that employs a discount rate that reflects the current market pricing for loans with similar characteristics and remaining maturity, adjusted by an amount for estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The rates take into account the expected yield curve. The Company classifies the fair value of loans held for investment as Level 3.

Real Estate Owned

Assets acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure are recorded at fair value less estimated liquidation costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated liquidation costs. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience, and are considered Level 3. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated liquidation costs (5-20% discount rate), is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in the economic conditions.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as checking, savings, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The fair value of term deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The Company classifies the fair value of term deposits as Level 2.

Borrowings

The carrying amount of overnight borrowings approximates the fair value. The fair value of term borrowings is calculated based on the discounted cash flow of contractual amounts due, using market rates currently available for borrowings of similar amount and remaining maturity. The Company classifies the fair value of term borrowings as Level 2.

Derivatives

The fair value of our interest rate swap was estimated using Level 2 inputs. The fair value was determined using third party prices that are based on discounted cash flow analyses using observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.

Commitments to Extend Credit and to Purchase or Sell Securities

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of commitments to purchase or sell securities is estimated based on bid quotations received from securities dealers. The fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments approximates book value.

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 by level within the fair value hierarchy. There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the year ended June 30, 2018.

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2018		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Equity Securities	$	1,565	$	1,565	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
Residential MBS		71		—		71		—
Commercial MBS		4,137		—		4,137		—
CMO		38,918		—		38,918		—
Total securities available for sale		44,691		1,565		43,126		—
Interest rate swap		16,789		—		16,789		—
Total assets measured on a recurring basis		61,480		1,565		59,915		—

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2017		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
Equity Securities	$	1,498	$	1,498	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
Residential MBS		6,921		—		6,921		—
Commercial MBS		4,406		—		4,406		—
CMO		85,105		—		85,105		—
Total securities available for sale		97,930		1,498		96,432		—
Interest rate swap		6,437		—		6,437		—
Total assets measured on a recurring basis		104,367		1,498		102,869		—

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure the fair value of certain other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or write downs of individual assets.

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 by level within the fair value hierarchy.

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2018			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans:
Other commercial real estate		$	1,056		$	—		$	—		$	1,056
Total impaired loans			1,056			—			—			1,056
Real estate owned
Other commercial real estate			1,564			—			—			1,564
Total real estate owned			1,564			—			—			1,564
Total assets measured on a nonrecurring basis		$	2,620		$	—		$	—		$	2,620

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2017			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans:
Residential		$	59		$	—		$	—		$	59
Other commercial real estate			2,907			—			—			2,907
Total impaired loans			2,966			—			—			2,966
Real estate owned
Other commercial real estate			140			—			—			140
Total real estate owned			140			—			—			140
Total assets measured on a nonrecurring basis		$	3,106		$	—		$	—		$	3,106

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments not recorded at fair values in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2018 and 2017.  These tables exclude financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value.  Financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value include cash and cash equivalents, FHLB stock, non-maturity deposits, overnight borrowings, and accrued interest.

	At June 30, 2018				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	335,374	$	326,511	$	—	$	326,511	$	—
Loans, net (1)		3,540,903		3,470,434		—		—		3,470,434
Financial liabilities:
Term deposits		1,211,531		1,219,558		—		1,219,558		—
Term borrowings		497,372		486,278		—		486,278		—

(1) Comprised of loans (including impaired loans), net of deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses.

	At June 30, 2017				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	239,631	$	237,204	$	—	$	237,204	$	—
Loans, net (1)		3,566,703		3,532,998		—		—		3,532,998
Financial assets:
Term deposits		1,124,140		1,134,628		—		1,134,628		—
Term borrowings		489,859		487,305		—		487,305		—

(1) Comprised of loans (including impaired loans), net of deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses.

Limitations

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company's entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company's financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include the mortgage banking operation, deferred tax assets, and premises and equipment. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

XML

Parent Company Only Financial Statements

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Parent Company Only Financial Statements [Abstract]

Parent Company Only Financial Statements

(19) Parent Company Only Financial Statements

The following condensed financial information for Oritani Financial Corp. (parent company only) reflect the investment in its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Oritani Bank, Oritani, LLC and Hampshire Financial, LLC, using the equity method of accounting.

Balance Sheets

	June 30,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Cash	$	34	$	51
Fed Funds Sold		56,552		24,440
ESOP loan		19,703		21,449
Securities available for sale, at fair value		1,565		1,498
Accrued Interest Receivable		440		399
Investment in Subsidiaries		481,412		524,413
Other assets		—		37
Total Assets	$	559,706	$	572,287
Liabilities and Equity
Borrowings		—		12,500
Other liabilities		360		564
Total Equity		559,346		559,223
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	559,706	$	572,287

Statements of Income

	Year Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Interest on mortgage loans	$	—		$	—		$	1,205
Interest on ESOP loan		845			815			838
Interest income on fed funds		377			295			176
Dividends/distributions from subsidiary		96,153			—			44,392
Gain on sale of securities		—			—			406
Other income		43			35			35
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(53,243	)		49,286			13,563
Total income		44,175			50,431			60,615
Interest on borrowings		67			404			405
Other expenses		1,375			1,016			979
Income before income tax expense		42,733			49,011			59,231
Income tax (benefit) expense		(161	)		(133	)		6,936
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295

Statements of Cash Flows

	Year Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		—			—			(406	)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		53,243			(49,286	)		(13,563	)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable		(41	)		12			118
Decrease in other assets		117			16			12
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(308	)		121			(155	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		95,905			7			38,301
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		—			—			1,013
Principal collected on ESOP loan		1,746			2,129			2,469
Decrease in mortgage loans, net		—			—			31,616
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,746			2,129			35,098
Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid to shareholders		(57,353	)		(51,850	)		(50,007	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(7,834	)		(1,574	)		(1,593	)
Stock issued upon exercise of stock options		12,131			9,567			14,705
Repayment of long term debt		(12,500	)		—			—
Cash used in financing activities		(65,556	)		(43,857	)		(36,895	)
Net change in cash and equivalents		32,095			(41,721	)		36,504
Cash at beginning of period		24,491			66,212			29,708
Cash at end of period	$	56,586		$	24,491		$	66,212

XML

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) [Abstract]

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

(20) Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

	Fiscal 2018 Quarter Ended
	September 30		December 31		March 31		June 30
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income	$	37,920	$	38,052	$	37,561	$	39,293
Interest expense		10,276		10,444		10,608		11,572
Net interest income		27,644		27,608		26,953		27,721
Provision for loan losses		—		—		—		—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		27,644		27,608		26,953		27,721
Other income		971		623		979		1,015
Other expense		9,512		10,213		9,760		10,019
Income before income tax expense		19,103		18,018		18,172		18,717
Income tax expense		7,107		14,048		4,747		5,214
Net income	$	11,996	$	3,970	$	13,425	$	13,503
Basic Earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.09	$	0.30	$	0.30
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.09	$	0.30	$	0.30

	Fiscal 2017 Quarter Ended
	September 30		December 31		March 31		June 30(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income	$	34,060	$	35,251	$	36,586	$	36,565
Interest expense		8,760		9,022		9,791		10,278
Net interest income		25,300		26,229		26,795		26,287
Provision for loan losses		—		—		—		—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		25,300		26,229		26,795		26,287
Other income		1,258		1,183		21,741		(7,338	)
Other expense		10,268		11,058		9,893		14,710
Income before income tax expense		16,290		16,354		38,643		4,239
Income tax expense		5,679		4,978		14,377		1,348
Net income	$	10,611	$	11,376	$	24,266	$	2,891
Basic Earnings per common share	$	0.25	$	0.26	$	0.56	$	0.07
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	0.24	$	0.26	$	0.54	$	0.06

(1) Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000.  These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure.  Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure.  See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

XML

Earnings Per Share

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Earnings Per Share

(21) Earnings Per Share

The following is a summary of the Company's earnings per share calculations and reconciliations of basic to diluted earnings per share.

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except for per share data)
Net income	$	42,894	$	49,144	$	52,295
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic		44,226		43,263		41,864
Effect of dilutive non-vested shares and stock options outstanding		848		1,246		1,411
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted		45,074		44,509		43,275
Earnings per share-basic	$	0.97	$	1.14	$	1.25
Earnings per share-diluted	$	0.95	$	1.10	$	1.21

XML

Other Comprehensive Income

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Other Comprehensive Income [Abstract]

Other Comprehensive Income

(22) Other Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income, both gross and net of tax, are presented for the periods below (in thousands):

	Years ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
Gross:
Net income	$	74,010		$	75,526		$	80,829
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(1,182	)		(2,795	)		1,011
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		324			883			(990	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		10,352			15,820			(13,936	)
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		35			402			224
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			8,112			—
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		503			1,482			(797	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		10,032			23,904			(14,488	)
Total comprehensive income		84,042			99,430			66,341
Tax applicable to:
Net income		31,116			26,382			28,534
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(437	)		(1,202	)		416
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		140			381			(428	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		3,556			6,839			(6,020	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			3,498			—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		14			156			95
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		156			640			(327	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		3,429			10,312			(6,264	)
Total comprehensive income		34,545			36,694			22,270
Net of tax:
Net income		42,894			49,144			52,295
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(745	)		(1,593	)		595
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		184			502			(562	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		6,796			8,981			(7,916	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			4,614			—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		21			246			129
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		347			842			(470	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		6,603			13,592			(8,224	)
Total comprehensive income	$	49,497		$	62,736		$	44,071

The following table presents the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

	Unrealized Holding Gains on Securities Available for Sale			Post Retirement Obligations			Unrealized Holding Gains on Interest Rate Swaps			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	438		$	(569	)	$	3,651		$	3,520
Net change		(561	)		368			6,796			6,603
Reclassification due to adoption of ASU No. 2018-02		37			(113	)		1,176			1,100
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	(86	)	$	(314	)	$	11,623		$	11,223
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	1,529		$	(1,657	)	$	(9,944	)	$	(10,072	)
Net change		(1,091	)		1,088			13,595			13,592
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	438		$	(569	)	$	3,651		$	3,520

The following table sets forth information about the amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the consolidated statement of income and the affected line item in the statement where net income is presented (in thousands).

		Year ended June 30,
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Component	Affected line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income	2018		2017		2016
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income	Net loss (gain) on sale of securities	$	324	$	883	$	(990	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income	Net loss on termination of derivatives		—		8,112		—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations (1)
Net loss			35		402		224
Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits			35		402		224
Total before tax			359		9,397		(766	)
Income tax expense (benefit)			154		4,035		(333	)
Net of tax		$	205	$	5,362	$	(433	)

(1) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computations of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 14, Postretirement Benefits.

XML

Real Estate Joint Ventures, net and Real Estate Held for Investment

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net and Real Estate Held for Investment [Abstract]

Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net and Real Estate Held for Investment

(23) Real Estate Joint Ventures, net and Real Estate Held for Investment

The Company accounted for investments in joint ventures under the equity method.  The balance reflected the cost basis of investments, plus the Company's share of income earned on the joint venture operations, less cash distributions, including excess cash distributions, and the Company's share of losses on joint venture operations.  Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment in a joint venture was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities.  As of June 30, 2016, the Company had ownership interest in one joint venture entity that owned an income-producing commercial rental property.  This entity was sold during 2017.  Proceeds from the sale of joint investments for the year ended June 30, 2017 were $25.3 million resulting in gains of $20.9 million.  All other joint ventures investments were sold during fiscal 2016 and 2015.  Proceeds from the sale of joint investments for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $20.8 million resulting in gains of $19.7 million.

Real estate held for investment included the Company's undivided interest in real estate properties accounted for under the equity method and properties held for investment purposes.  Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment for an undivided interest in real estate property was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities.  The operations of the properties held for investment purposes are reflected in the financial results of the Company and included in the Other Income caption in the Income Statement.  Properties held for investment purposes were carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.  As of June 30, 2016, all real estate investments were sold during fiscal 2016 and 2015.  Proceeds from the sale of real estate investments for the year ended June 30, 2016 were $17.7 million resulting in gains of $17.8 million.

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

(24) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2018-02, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ASU 2018-02 allows the Company to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for the stranded tax effect resulting from the Tax Act. ASU 2018-02 is required to be adopted by the Company no later than January 1, 2019. The company early adopted ASU 2018-02  on January 1, 2018 and an election was made to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the amount of $1.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. See Footnote 12, Other Comprehensive Income, for further details.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, "Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities". The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align a company's financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities.  The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, permitted.   The Company plans to adopt ASU 2017-12 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019.  The update requires a modified retrospective transition method in which the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of the change on the opening balance of each affected component of equity in the statement of financial position as of the date of adoption.   While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, the Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting".  This update provides guidance about changes to terms or conditions of a share based payment award which would require modification accounting. In particular, an entity is required to account for the effects of a modification if the fair value, vesting condition or the equity/liability classification of the modified award is not the same immediately before and after a change to the terms and conditions of the award.  This update is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company  adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, "Compensation – Retirement Benefits, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost." This update will require employers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period.  Other components of the net periodic benefit cost will be presented separately from the service cost component.  This update will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory".  This update requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.  This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cashflows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments".  This update addresses eight specific cash flow issue with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice.  This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the update to materially impact the Company's statement of cash flows, although the classification of certain items could shift relative to past presentation.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments".  This update revises the methodology for estimating credit losses on loans receivable, held-to-maturity debt securities, unfunded loan commitments, and certain other financial assets measured at amortized cost.  Under ASU 2016-13, the current expected credit losses ("CECL") model is based on lifetime expected losses, rather than incurred losses, and requires the recognition of credit loss expense in the statement of income and a related allowance for credit losses on the balance sheet at the time of origination or purchase of a loan receivable or held-to-maturity debt security.  Subsequent changes in this estimate are recorded through credit loss expense and related allowance.  The CECL model requires the use of not only relevant historical experience and current conditions, but also reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events and circumstances, thus incorporating a broad range of information in developing credit loss estimates, which could result in significant changes to both the timing and amount of credit loss expense and allowance.  Under ASU 2016-13, available-for-sale debt securities are evaluated for impairment if fair value is less than amortized cost.  Estimated credit losses are recorded through a credit loss expense and an allowance, rather than a write-down of the investment.  Changes in fair value that are not credit-related will continue to be recorded in other comprehensive income.  Certain additional disclosures are required, including further disaggregation of credit quality indicators for loans receivable by year of origination.  This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  Entities will apply the standard's provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach).   The Company is evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements, the extent of which is indeterminable at this time as it will be dependent upon various factors at the date of adoption, including but not limited to portfolio composition, credit quality, economic conditions and forecasts at that time.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, "Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting". This ASU requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor's previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting.  Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The amendments in this Update require that an entity that has an available for sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The ASU was effective for all entities in fiscal years, and interim periods in those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption was permitted. The new guidance will be applied prospectively to changes in ownership (or influence) after the adoption date. We adopted this guidance on July 1, 2017 with no significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force))".  This ASU clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument (novation), that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, on its own, require dedesignation of that hedge accounting relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.  This ASU was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein.  Early adoption was permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  We adopted this guidance on July 1, 2017 with no significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)".  This ASU requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to current accounting treatment.  This ASU changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease execution costs, and, for lessors, modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases.  For public business entities, this ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein.  Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company's consolidated financial statements.  The Company expects a gross-up of its consolidated balance sheet as a result of recognizing lease liabilities and right of use assets; the extent of such gross-up is under evaluation.  The Company does not expect adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments.  The ASU revises an entity's accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value.  It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.  The disclosure of fair value of the loan portfolio will be impacted as the fair value will be calculated using an exit price.  The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017.   The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018. The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment for its equity instruments to the balance sheet as of July 1, 2018 in the amount of $658,000, representing the unrealized gain, net of tax at June 30, 2018. Going forward the fair value will be realized in the statement of income.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." The objective of this amendment is to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are in the scope of other standards. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 to defer for one year the effective date of the new revenue standard. The requirements are effective for annual periods and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016, the FASB issued further implementation guidance regarding revenue recognition. This additional guidance included clarification on certain principal versus agent considerations within the implementation of the guidance as well as clarification related to identifying performance obligations and licensing, assessing collectibility, presenting sales taxes, measuring noncash consideration, and certain transition matters. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.  The Company's primary revenue source is net interest income on financial instruments and, to a lesser extent, non-interest income  As the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans, leases, securities and derivatives that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the new revenue recognition standard does not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.  The Company's implementation efforts include the identification of revenue streams within the scope of the guidance, as well as the evaluation of revenue contracts.  While there were no material changes related to the timing or amount of revenue recognition, the guidance includes expanded disclosures to revenue which we are currently in the process of drafting.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of H.R. 1, commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act"), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements are comprised of the accounts of Oritani Financial Corp. (the "Company"), and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Oritani Bank (the "Bank"); Hampshire Financial, LLC, and Oritani, LLC, and the wholly owned subsidiaries of Oritani Bank, Oritani Finance Company, Ormon LLC ("Ormon"), and Oritani Investment Corp., as well as its wholly owned subsidiary, Oritani Asset Corporation (a real estate investment trust), collectively, the Company. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Business

Business

The Company provides a wide range of deposit banking services to individual and corporate customers in the New Jersey counties of Bergen, Hudson, Essex and Passaic. The Company provides loans to individual and corporate customers in New Jersey as well as corporate customers primarily in portions of the states of New York and Pennsylvania. The Company is subject to competition from other financial institutions and to the regulations of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2018 and 2017, and in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans.  In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, management generally obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

A substantial portion of the Company's loans are secured by real estate in the New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania markets. In addition, the real estate joint ventures and real estate owned are located in that same market. Accordingly, as with most financial institutions in the market area, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Company's loan portfolio and the recovery of the carrying amount of real estate joint ventures and real estate owned are susceptible to changes in market conditions.

Securities

Securities

Securities include debt, mortgage-backed and marketable equity securities. Management determines the appropriate classification of securities as either available for sale or held to maturity at the purchase date. Securities that may be sold in response to changing market and interest rate conditions or as part of an overall asset/liability strategy are classified as available for sale. Gains or losses on sales of securities available for sale are based upon the specific-identification method. Securities classified as available for sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses net of applicable taxes, included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of equity. If management has the intent and the ability at the time of purchase to hold securities until maturity, they are classified as held to maturity. Securities held to maturity are carried at cost, adjusted for unamortized purchase premiums and discounts. Premiums and discounts on securities are accreted or amortized using the level-yield method over the estimated lives of the securities, including the effect of prepayments. Any portion of unrealized loss on an individual equity security deemed to be other than temporarily impaired is recognized as a loss in operations in the period in which such determination is made. For debt investment securities deemed other than temporarily impaired, the investment is written down through current earnings by the impairment related to the estimated credit loss and the non-credit related impairment is recognized in other comprehensive income.  In the ordinary course of business, securities are pledged as collateral in conjunction with the Company's borrowings, lines of credit and derivative portfolios.

Loans

Loans

Mortgages on real estate and other loans are stated at the outstanding principal amount of the loans, net of deferred loan fees/costs and the allowance for loan losses. Loan origination and commitment fees, net of related costs, are deferred and amortized as an adjustment to the loan's yield, utilizing the level yield method, over the actual lives of the related loans. Interest income on loans is accrued and credited to interest income as earned. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become delinquent 90 days or more as to principal or interest, or when it appears that principal or interest is uncollectible. Interest accrued prior to a loan being placed on nonaccrual status is subsequently reversed. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized only in the period it is ultimately collected. Loans are returned to an accrual status when factors indicating doubtful collectibility no longer exist. Loans are generally charged off after an analysis is completed which indicates, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, collectibility of principal and interest is highly questionable and improbable.

The Company defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on current information, that the Company will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans individually classified as impaired include loans which have a principal balance balances of $1.0 million or more and are ninety days or more delinquent, unless a condition exists for loans less than $1.0 million that would increase the Bank's potential loss exposure.  All TDRs are considered impaired loans, regardless of their principal balance.  Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that each loan's carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the related collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows. Residential mortgage and consumer loans are deemed smaller balance homogeneous loans which are evaluated collectively for impairment and are generally excluded from the population of impaired loans.

The portion of any residential real estate mortgage loan that is not adequately secured is generally charged off when deemed to be uncollectible unless it can be clearly demonstrated that repayment will occur regardless of the delinquency status. Examples that would demonstrate repayment include; a loan that is adequately secured by collateral and is in the process of collection; a loan supported by a valid guarantee or insurance; or a loan supported by a valid claim against a solvent estate. Charge-offs of commercial real estate mortgage loans are made on the basis of management's ongoing evaluation of nonperforming loans. In the ordinary course of business, loans are pledged as collateral in conjunction with the Company's borrowings.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged to income based on management's evaluation of the probable incurred losses inherent in its portfolio.  Such evaluation includes a review of the entire loan portfolio, including all loans for which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured and considers, among other matters, the estimated net realizable value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions and other matters which warrant consideration. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific reserves for individually impaired loans, (ii) reserves for adversely classified, or higher risk rated, loans that are not impaired, (iii) reserves for other loans based on historical loss factors (using the appropriate loss look-back and loss emergence periods) adjusted for both internal and external qualitative risk factors.  See Note 5, "Allowance for Loan Losses" of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the allowance for loan losses and loan credit quality.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions in the Company's market area.  In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company's allowance for loan losses.  Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.

Troubled-Debt Restructuring

Troubled-Debt Restructuring

Troubled debt restructured ("TDR") loans are those loans whose terms have been modified because of deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower. Modifications could include extension of the terms of the loan, reduced interest rates, and forgiveness of accrued interest and/or principal. Once an obligation has been restructured because of such credit problems, it continues to be considered restructured until paid in full or, if the restructured debt is at a market rate (a rate equal to or greater than the rate the Company was willing to accept at the time of the restructuring for a new loan with comparable risk), until the year subsequent to the year in which the restructuring takes place, provided the borrower has performed under the modified terms for a six month period.

Bank Owned Life Insurance

Bank Owned Life Insurance

Bank-owned life insurance is accounted for using the cash surrender value method and is recorded at its realizable value adjusted for other charges or amounts due that are probable at settlement.  The change in the cash surrender value, as well as insurance proceeds are included in other noninterest income.

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock

Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Stock

The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLB"), is required to hold shares of capital stock in the FHLB in an amount based on the Bank's total investment in mortgage related assets and advances.  The requirement pertaining to mortgage related assets is a range from 0.10% to 0.25% of mortgage related assets, and is currently equal to 0.20%. The requirement pertaining to advances is a range from 4.0% to 5.0% of total advances, and is currently equal to 4.5%.  The stock is carried at cost.  In performing our other-than-temporary impairment analysis of FHLB stock, we evaluated, among other things, (i) its earnings performance, including the significance of any decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the regulatory capital amount of the FHLB, (ii) the commitment by the FHLB to make required dividend payments, and (iii) the liquidity position of the FHLB.  We do not consider this security to be impaired at June 30, 2018.  Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.

Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net

Investments in Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net

The Company accounted for investments in joint ventures under the equity method. The balance reflected the cost basis of investments, plus the Company's share of income earned on the joint venture operations, less cash distributions, including excess cash distributions, and the Company's share of losses on joint venture operations. Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment in a joint venture was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities.

Real Estate Held for Investment

Real Estate Held for Investment

Real estate held for investment included the Company's undivided interest in real estate properties accounted for under the equity method and properties held for investment purposes. Cash received in excess of the Company's recorded investment for an undivided interest in real estate property was recorded as unearned revenue in other liabilities. The operations of the properties held for investment purposes were reflected in the financial results of the Company and included in the Other Income caption in the Income Statement. Properties held for investment purposes were carried at cost less accumulated depreciation.

Office Properties and Equipment

Office Properties and Equipment

Land is carried as cost.  Office properties and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation of office properties and equipment is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.  The Company uses the following estimated useful lives for its office properties and equipment categories: land improvements – 15 years; building and major building improvements – 40 years; minor building improvements – 10 years and furniture and fixtures – 3 to 7 years.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the remaining life of the lease or the useful life of the improvement.  Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

Employee Benefit Plans

Employee Benefit Plans

The Bank has a defined benefit pension plan which covered all employees who satisfied the eligibility requirements.  The Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2008.  The defined benefit pension plan is a multi-employer plan.  Costs of the pension plan are based on the contribution required to be made to the program.  The Bank's policy is to fund at least the minimum contribution required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

The Bank has a 401(k) savings incentive plan covering substantially all employees of the Bank. The Bank may match a percentage of the first 6% of employee contributions. The contribution percentage is determined annually by the Board of Directors.

The employee stock ownership plan ("ESOP") is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, "Employers' Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans."  The funds borrowed by the ESOP from the Company to purchase the Company's common stock will be repaid from the Bank's contributions over a period of up to 25 years.  The Company's common stock not yet allocated to participants is recorded as a reduction of stockholders' equity at cost.  Compensation expense for the ESOP is based on the market price of the Company's stock and is recognized as shares are committed to be released to participants.  Dividends on allocated shares reduce retained earnings; dividends on unallocated ESOP shares reduce debt and accrued interest.

The Bank provides several nonqualified, defined benefit plans which provide benefits to executive officers and directors of the Company. These plans are unfunded and the costs of the plans are recognized over the period that services are provided.

The Company provides several post-retirement benefit plans to directors and certain retired employees and will provide such benefits to certain active officers that are accounted for in accordance with ASC 715, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits". This guidance requires an employer to: (a) recognize in its statement of financial condition the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligation; (b) measure a plan's assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the date of its year-end balance sheet and (c) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, the actuarial gains and losses and the prior service costs and credits that arise during the period. The Company accrues the cost of post-retirement benefit plans during the employee's period of active service.

The Company's equity incentive plan is accounted for in accordance with ASC 718, "Compensation-Stock Compensation".  This guidance requires companies to recognize in the statement of earnings the grant-date fair value of stock based awards issued to employees.  Compensation cost related to stock based awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods.  In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting" ("ASU 2016-09"), an amendment to ASC 718.  The update simplifies certain aspects of accounting for share-based payments.  The amendments include the following:

• Excess tax benefits and deficiencies resulting from exercise or vesting of stock awards are recorded as income tax expense or benefit on the income statement.  Previously, excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies were recorded in additional paid-in capital.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• For diluted earnings per share calculations, excess tax benefits are no longer included in assumed proceeds when determining average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method, resulting in changes to average diluted shares outstanding.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• Excess tax benefits or deficiencies are included as income tax expense as discrete items in the period in which they occur, which impact the effective tax rate in each reporting period; however, these discrete items are not included in the projected annual effective tax rate calculation.  This update is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.

• Excess tax benefits are presented as cash flows from operating activities.  Previously, excess tax benefits were included as a cash inflow from financing activities.  This update may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively upon adoption.  This update was applied retrospectively upon adoption.

• Cash paid by an employer to taxing authorities when withholding shares for tax withholding purposes is presented as cash outflows from financing activities.  Previously, there was no specific guidance on cash flow presentation, and these outflows were presented within cash flows from operating activities.  This update is required to be applied retrospectively upon adoption.

• An accounting policy election, at the entity level using a modified retrospective transition method, to account for forfeitures as they occur or estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited, as is currently required.  The Company elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.

The update was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  Any adjustments from the update was required to be applied as of the beginning of the year of adoption.  The Company adopted the update during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, and retroactively applied the guidance effective as of July 1, 2015.  The update under ASC 718 resulted in a cumulative effect debit adjustment of $33,000 to retained earnings as of July 1, 2015.  The most significant impact of the amended guidance resulted in recognition of excess tax benefits within income tax expense, which resulted in an increase to net income and earnings per share.  In addition, this guidance increases average diluted shares, since the Company no longer includes such excess tax benefits in the calculation of diluted shares.  Certain amounts or ratios presented for 2016 interim periods were restated to reflect the adoption of the new guidance.  Adoption of the update did not affect the  Company or Bank's total equity, book value per share, or regulatory capital ratios.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes

The Company records income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, "Income Taxes," using the asset and liability method. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities: (i) are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns; (ii) are attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases; and (iii) are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years when those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Where applicable, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance for any portions determined not likely to be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period of enactment. The valuation allowance is adjusted, by a charge or credit to income tax expense, as changes in facts and circumstances warrant. Income taxes are allocated to the individual entities within the consolidated group based on the effective tax rate of the entity.  The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Derivatives Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.  As part of its asset/liability management strategies, the Company  uses interest rate swaps to hedge variability in future cash flows caused by changes in interest rates and accounts for these swaps as cash flow hedges.  Interest rate swaps are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as either an asset or liability at fair value. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income or loss and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged forecasted transactions affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. We formally document our risk management objectives, strategy, and the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged items. We evaluate the effectiveness of the hedge relationship, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, by comparing the changes in fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction.  Derivatives not designated as hedges do not meet the hedge accounting requirements under U.S. GAAP.  Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings.

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income is comprised of  net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes items recorded directly to equity, such as unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, change in actuarial gains and losses on other post retirement benefits, unrealized gains and losses on derivatives used in cash flow hedging relationships, and change in service cost on other postretirement benefits, net of taxes. Comprehensive income and its components is presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for all periods presented. See Note 22 for additional disclosures.

Earnings Per Share

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share, or EPS, is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period.  The weighted average common shares outstanding include the average number of shares of common stock outstanding and allocated or committed to be released Employee Stock Ownership Plan shares.

Diluted earnings per share is computed using the same method as basic earnings per share, but reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock were exercised and converted into common stock.  These potentially dilutive shares would then be included in the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period using the treasury stock method.  The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  The update amended the diluted earnings per share calculation in that excess tax benefits are no longer included in assumed proceeds when determining average diluted shares outstanding under the treasury stock method.  This guidance is required to be applied prospectively upon adoption.  For further discussion, see Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Employee Benefit Plans".

When applying the treasury stock method for the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we add the assumed proceeds from option exercises and the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options.  We then divide this sum by our average stock price to calculate shares repurchased.  The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted EPS.  For the years ended June 30, 2016, we added: (1) the assumed proceeds from option exercises; (2) the tax benefit that would have been credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of non-qualified stock options and vesting of shares of restricted stock; and (3) the average unamortized compensation costs related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock options.  We then divided this sum by our average stock price to calculate shares repurchased.  The excess of the number of shares issuable over the number of shares assumed to be repurchased is added to basic weighted average common shares to calculate diluted EPS.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the consolidated statement of condition date of June 30, 2018, for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.  The evaluation was conducted through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

Reclassifications

Reclassifications

Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform with the current period's reporting format.

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

The Company adopted ASC 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", on July 1, 2008. Under ASC 820, fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC 820 are described below:

Basis of Fair Value Measurement:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Price or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).

A financial instrument's level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Following are descriptions of the valuation methodologies and key inputs used to measure assets recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis. The descriptions include an indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the assets or liabilities are classified.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value.

Securities

The Company records securities held to maturity at amortized cost and securities available for sale at fair value on a recurring basis. The majority of the Company's securities are fixed income instruments that are not quoted on an exchange, but are traded in active markets. The fair values for securities are obtained from an independent nationally recognized third-party pricing service. Our independent pricing service provides us with prices which are primarily categorized as Level 2, as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are generally not available for the majority of securities in our portfolio. Pricing services may employ modeling techniques in determining pricing. Inputs to these models include market spreads, dealer quotes, prepayment speeds, credit information and the instrument's terms and conditions, among other things. Management compares the pricing to a second independent pricing source for reasonableness. Equity securities are reported at Level 1 based on quoted market prices for identical securities in active markets.

FHLB of New York Stock

FHLB of New York Stock is recorded at cost (par value) and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. There is no active market for this stock and no significant observable market data is available for this instrument. The Company considers the profitability and asset quality of FHLB, dividend payment history and recent redemption experience, when determining the ultimate recoverability of the par value. The Company believes its investment in FHLB stock is recoverable at par.  It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on the stock's transferability.  The carrying amount of FHLB stock approximates fair value, since this is the amount for which it could be redeemed.

Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, periodically, the Company records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements. The fair value for significant nonperforming loans and impaired loans are valued utilizing independent appraisals of the collateral securing such loans that rely upon quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience. The appraisals are adjusted downward by management (0-20% adjustment rate and 0-10% risk premium rate), as necessary, for changes in relevant valuation factors subsequent to the appraisal date and the timing of anticipated cash flows (0-8% discount rate). The Company classifies impaired loans as Level 3.

Fair value for loans held for investment is estimated using portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential, residential CRE, grocery/credit retail CRE, other CRE, and construction and land. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming/impaired categories. Fair value of performing loans is estimated using a discounted cash flow model that employs a discount rate that reflects the current market pricing for loans with similar characteristics and remaining maturity, adjusted by an amount for estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The rates take into account the expected yield curve. The Company classifies the fair value of loans held for investment as Level 3.

Real Estate Owned

Assets acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure are recorded at fair value less estimated liquidation costs when acquired, thus establishing a new cost basis. Subsequently, real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated liquidation costs. Fair value is generally based on independent appraisals. These appraisals include adjustments to comparable assets based on the appraisers' market knowledge and experience, and are considered Level 3. When an asset is acquired, the excess of the loan balance over fair value, less estimated liquidation costs (5-20% discount rate), is charged to the allowance for loan losses. If the fair value of the asset declines, a write-down is recorded through expense. The valuation of foreclosed assets is subjective in nature and may be adjusted in the future because of changes in the economic conditions.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as checking, savings, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand at the balance sheet date. The fair value of term deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The Company classifies the fair value of term deposits as Level 2.

Borrowings

The carrying amount of overnight borrowings approximates the fair value. The fair value of term borrowings is calculated based on the discounted cash flow of contractual amounts due, using market rates currently available for borrowings of similar amount and remaining maturity. The Company classifies the fair value of term borrowings as Level 2.

Derivatives

The fair value of our interest rate swap was estimated using Level 2 inputs. The fair value was determined using third party prices that are based on discounted cash flow analyses using observed market interest rate curves and volatilities.

Commitments to Extend Credit and to Purchase or Sell Securities

The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair value of commitments to purchase or sell securities is estimated based on bid quotations received from securities dealers. The fair value of off-balance-sheet commitments approximates book value.

Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure the fair value of certain other financial assets on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The adjustments to fair value usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-fair value accounting or write downs of individual assets.

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2018-02, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) - Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ASU 2018-02 allows the Company to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings for the stranded tax effect resulting from the Tax Act. ASU 2018-02 is required to be adopted by the Company no later than January 1, 2019. The company early adopted ASU 2018-02  on January 1, 2018 and an election was made to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in the amount of $1.1 million from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. See Footnote 12, Other Comprehensive Income, for further details.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, "Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities". The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align a company's financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities.  The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, permitted.   The Company plans to adopt ASU 2017-12 during the first quarter of fiscal 2019.  The update requires a modified retrospective transition method in which the Company will recognize the cumulative effect of the change on the opening balance of each affected component of equity in the statement of financial position as of the date of adoption.   While the Company continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, the Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, "Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting".  This update provides guidance about changes to terms or conditions of a share based payment award which would require modification accounting. In particular, an entity is required to account for the effects of a modification if the fair value, vesting condition or the equity/liability classification of the modified award is not the same immediately before and after a change to the terms and conditions of the award.  This update is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company  adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. 

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, "Compensation – Retirement Benefits, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-Retirement Benefit Cost." This update will require employers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period.  Other components of the net periodic benefit cost will be presented separately from the service cost component.  This update will be effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.  The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory".  This update requires that an entity recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs.  This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the adoption of this guidance will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cashflows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments".  This update addresses eight specific cash flow issue with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice.  This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within that year.  The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018 and does not expect the update to materially impact the Company's statement of cash flows, although the classification of certain items could shift relative to past presentation.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments".  This update revises the methodology for estimating credit losses on loans receivable, held-to-maturity debt securities, unfunded loan commitments, and certain other financial assets measured at amortized cost.  Under ASU 2016-13, the current expected credit losses ("CECL") model is based on lifetime expected losses, rather than incurred losses, and requires the recognition of credit loss expense in the statement of income and a related allowance for credit losses on the balance sheet at the time of origination or purchase of a loan receivable or held-to-maturity debt security.  Subsequent changes in this estimate are recorded through credit loss expense and related allowance.  The CECL model requires the use of not only relevant historical experience and current conditions, but also reasonable and supportable forecasts of future events and circumstances, thus incorporating a broad range of information in developing credit loss estimates, which could result in significant changes to both the timing and amount of credit loss expense and allowance.  Under ASU 2016-13, available-for-sale debt securities are evaluated for impairment if fair value is less than amortized cost.  Estimated credit losses are recorded through a credit loss expense and an allowance, rather than a write-down of the investment.  Changes in fair value that are not credit-related will continue to be recorded in other comprehensive income.  Certain additional disclosures are required, including further disaggregation of credit quality indicators for loans receivable by year of origination.  This update is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.  Entities will apply the standard's provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach).   The Company is evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements, the extent of which is indeterminable at this time as it will be dependent upon various factors at the date of adoption, including but not limited to portfolio composition, credit quality, economic conditions and forecasts at that time.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-07, "Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting". This ASU requires that the equity method investor add the cost of acquiring the additional interest in the investee to the current basis of the investor's previously held interest and adopt the equity method of accounting as of the date the investment becomes qualified for equity method accounting.  Therefore, upon qualifying for the equity method of accounting, no retroactive adjustment of the investment is required. The amendments in this Update require that an entity that has an available for sale equity security that becomes qualified for the equity method of accounting recognize through earnings the unrealized holding gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income at the date the investment becomes qualified for use of the equity method. The ASU was effective for all entities in fiscal years, and interim periods in those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption was permitted. The new guidance will be applied prospectively to changes in ownership (or influence) after the adoption date. We adopted this guidance on July 1, 2017 with no significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force))".  This ASU clarifies that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument (novation), that has been designated as a hedging instrument does not, on its own, require dedesignation of that hedge accounting relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met.  This ASU was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein.  Early adoption was permitted, including adoption in an interim period.  We adopted this guidance on July 1, 2017 with no significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)".  This ASU requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to current accounting treatment.  This ASU changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease execution costs, and, for lessors, modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases.  For public business entities, this ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein.  Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on the Company's consolidated financial statements.  The Company expects a gross-up of its consolidated balance sheet as a result of recognizing lease liabilities and right of use assets; the extent of such gross-up is under evaluation.  The Company does not expect adoption of this pronouncement to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities", which is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments.  The ASU revises an entity's accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value.  It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments.  The disclosure of fair value of the loan portfolio will be impacted as the fair value will be calculated using an exit price.  The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017.   The Company adopted this standard effective July 1, 2018. The Company recorded a cumulative effect adjustment for its equity instruments to the balance sheet as of July 1, 2018 in the amount of $658,000, representing the unrealized gain, net of tax at June 30, 2018. Going forward the fair value will be realized in the statement of income.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." The objective of this amendment is to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are in the scope of other standards. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 to defer for one year the effective date of the new revenue standard. The requirements are effective for annual periods and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016, the FASB issued further implementation guidance regarding revenue recognition. This additional guidance included clarification on certain principal versus agent considerations within the implementation of the guidance as well as clarification related to identifying performance obligations and licensing, assessing collectibility, presenting sales taxes, measuring noncash consideration, and certain transition matters. The Company adopted ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method.  The Company's primary revenue source is net interest income on financial instruments and, to a lesser extent, non-interest income  As the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans, leases, securities and derivatives that are accounted for under other U.S. GAAP, the new revenue recognition standard does not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.  The Company's implementation efforts include the identification of revenue streams within the scope of the guidance, as well as the evaluation of revenue contracts.  While there were no material changes related to the timing or amount of revenue recognition, the guidance includes expanded disclosures to revenue which we are currently in the process of drafting.

On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of H.R. 1, commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the "Tax Act"), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes.

XML

Loans (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Loans, net [Abstract]

Comparative Summary of Loans

A comparative summary of loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	June 30, 2018		June 30, 2017
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	267,771	$	253,310
Residential commercial real estate		2,005,315		1,945,297
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		497,708		535,567
Other commercial real estate		796,589		866,826
Construction and land loans		10,960		4,210
Total loans		3,578,343		3,605,210
Less:
Deferred loan fees, net		6,878		8,235
Allowance for loan losses		30,562		30,272
Net loans	$	3,540,903	$	3,566,703

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Allowance for Loan Losses [Abstract]

Activity in Allowance for Loan Losses

Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of year	$	30,272		$	29,951		$	30,889
Provisions charged to operations		—			—			—
Recoveries		407			409			9
Loans charged off		(117	)		(88	)		(947	)
Balance at end of year	$	30,562		$	30,272		$	29,951

Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated by Loan Category

The following tables provide the twelve month activity in the allowance for loan losses allocated by loan category. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.

	Year ended June 30, 2018
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,261		$	15,794	$	3,000	$	10,017		$	200	$	30,272
Charge-offs		(117	)		—		—		—			—		(117	)
Recoveries		150			—		—		225			32		407
Provisions		696			1,465		15		(2,414	)		238		—
Ending balance	$	1,990		$	17,259	$	3,015	$	7,828		$	470	$	30,562

	Year ended June 30, 2017
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate			Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,300		$	12,837	$	3,646		$	11,850		$	318		$	29,951
Charge-offs		(75	)		—		—			(13	)		—			(88	)
Recoveries		—			—		—			409			—			409
Provisions		36			2,957		(646	)		(2,229	)		(118	)		—
Ending balance	$	1,261		$	15,794	$	3,000		$	10,017		$	200		$	30,272

	Year ended June 30, 2016
	Residential			Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate			Other commercial real estate			Construction and land loans			Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Beginning balance	$	1,521		$	10,814	$	4,042		$	13,943		$	569		$	30,889
Charge-offs		(98	)		—		—			(849	)		—			(947	)
Recoveries		—			—		—			9			—			9
Provisions		(123	)		2,023		(396	)		(1,253	)		(251	)		—
Ending balance	$	1,300		$	12,837	$	3,646		$	11,850		$	318		$	29,951

Loans Individually and Collectively Evaluated for Impairment and Related Allowance for Loan Loss by Class of Loans

The following table details the amount of loans receivables that are evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and the related portion of allowance for loan loss that is allocated to each loan portfolio segment at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

	At June 30, 2018
	Residential		Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate		Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,990		17,259		3,015		7,828		470		30,562
Total	$	1,990	$	17,259	$	3,015	$	7,828	$	470	$	30,562
Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	5,022	$	—	$	—	$	4,181	$	—	$	9,203
Collectively evaluated for impairment		262,749		2,005,315		497,708		792,408		10,960		3,569,140
Total	$	267,771	$	2,005,315	$	497,708	$	796,589	$	10,960	$	3,578,343

	June 30, 2017
	Residential		Residential commercial real estate		Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		Other commercial real estate		Construction and land loans		Total
	(In thousands)
Allowance for credit losses
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	43	$	—	$	43
Collectively evaluated for impairment		1,261		15,794		3,000		9,974		200		30,229
Total	$	1,261	$	15,794	$	3,000	$	10,017	$	200	$	30,272
Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,684	$	—	$	—	$	10,173	$	—	$	13,857
Collectively evaluated for impairment		249,626		1,945,297		535,567		856,653		4,210		3,591,353
Total	$	253,310	$	1,945,297	$	535,567	$	866,826	$	4,210	$	3,605,210

Information about Loan Credit Quality

The following table provides information about the loan credit quality at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Credit Quality Indicators at June 30, 2018
	Satisfactory		Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	242,534	$	18,731	$	171	$	6,335	$	—	$	267,771
Residential commercial real estate		1,981,781		21,952		1,582		—		—		2,005,315
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		494,723		—		2,985		—		—		497,708
Other commercial real estate		688,725		92,430		10,164		5,270		—		796,589
Construction and land loans		10,960		—		—		—		—		10,960
Total	$	3,418,723	$	133,113	$	14,902	$	11,605	$	—	$	3,578,343

	Credit Quality Indicators at June 30, 2017
	Satisfactory		Pass/Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	229,481	$	17,256	$	1,571	$	5,002	$	—	$	253,310
Residential commercial real estate		1,915,526		27,778		1,753		240		—		1,945,297
Grocery/credit retail commercial real estate		532,472		—		3,095		—		—		535,567
Other commercial real estate		725,714		107,249		15,551		18,312		—		866,826
Construction and land loans		4,210		—		—		—		—		4,210
Total	$	3,407,403	$	152,283	$	21,970	$	23,554	$	—	$	3,605,210

Delinquency and Accrual Status of Loan Portfolio

The following table summarizes the delinquency and accrual status of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	At June 30, 2018
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual (1)
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	2,696	$	753	$	5,213	$	8,662	$	259,109	$	267,771	$	6,335
Residential commercial real estate		1,582		—		—		1,582		2,003,733		2,005,315		—
Grocery/credit retail CRE		—		—		—		—		497,708		497,708		—
Other commercial real estate		1,009		—		136		1,145		795,444		796,589		1,542
Construction and land loans		—		—		—		—		10,960		10,960		—
Total	$	5,287	$	753	$	5,349	$	11,389	$	3,566,954	$	3,578,343	$	7,877

	At June 30, 2017
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		Nonaccrual (2)
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	1,243	$	1,776	$	614	$	3,633	$	249,677	$	253,310	$	1,556
Residential commercial real estate		240		—		—		240		1,945,057		1,945,297		—
Grocery/credit retail CRE		—		—		—		—		535,567		535,567		—
Other commercial real estate		606		—		1,897		2,503		864,323		866,826		8,667
Construction and land loans		—		—		—		—		4,210		4,210		—
Total	$	2,089	$	1,776	$	2,511	$	6,376	$	3,598,834	$	3,605,210	$	10,223

(1) Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2018 are residential loans totaling $35,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $582,000  that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $504,000 and other CRE loans totaling $1.4 million that were less than 30 days past due.

(2) Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2017 are residential loans totaling $716,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $205,000 that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $21,000 and other CRE loans totaling $6.8 million that were less than 30 days past due.

Information Regarding Impaired Loans

The following table provides information about the Company's impaired loans at June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Impaired Financing Receivables
	At June 30, 2018									Year ended June 30, 2018
	Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance			Allowance			Average Recorded Investment			Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential		$	5,021		$	5,022		$	—		$	4,614		$	64
Other commercial real estate			4,018			4,181			—			4,317			386
			9,039			9,203			—			8,931			450
Total:
Residential		$	5,021		$	5,022		$	—		$	4,614		$	64
Other commercial real estate			4,018			4,181			—			4,317			386
		$	9,039		$	9,203		$	—		$	8,931		$	450
Cash basis interest income															415

	Impaired Financing Receivables
	At June 30, 2017						Year ended June 30, 2017
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Residential	$	3,684	$	3,684	$	—	$	3,655	$	146
Other commercial real estate		9,635		9,635		—		8,848		560
		13,319		13,319		—		12,503		706
With an allowance recorded:
Other commercial real estate	$	495	$	538	$	43	$	554	$	—
		495		538		43		554		—
Total:
Residential	$	3,684	$	3,684	$	—	$	3,655	$	146
Other commercial real estate		10,130		10,173		43		9,402		560
	$	13,814	$	13,857	$	43	$	13,057	$	706
Cash basis interest income										611

Troubled Debt Restructured (TDR) Loans

The following table presents additional information regarding the Company's TDRs as of June 30, 2018 and 2017:

	Troubled Debt Restructurings at June 30, 2018
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	—	$	174	$	174
Other commercial real estate		309		1,407		1,716
Total	$	309	$	1,581	$	1,890
Allowance	$	—	$	—	$	—
	Troubled Debt Restructurings at June 30, 2017
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(In thousands)
Residential	$	—	$	178	$	178
Other commercial real estate		362		4,070		4,432
Total	$	362	$	4,248	$	4,610
Allowance	$	—	$	43	$	43

Summary of Troubled Debt Restructuring on Financing Receivables Modifications

The following tables summarize loans that were modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.  The pre-modification and post-modification outstanding recorded investments disclosed in the table below represent the loan carrying amounts immediately prior to the modification and the carrying amounts at June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

	Year ended June 30, 2018
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	1	$	271	$	249
Total	$	1	$	271	$	249

	Year ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	2	$	1,252	$	1,167
Total	$	2	$	1,252	$	1,167

	Year Ended June 30, 2016
	Number of Relationships		Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other commercial real estate	$	1	$	3,385	$	2,266
Total	$	1	$	3,385	$	2,266

XML

Securities Held for Maturity (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Securities Held for Maturity [Abstract]

Comparative Summary of Securities Held to Maturity

The following is a comparative summary of securities held to maturity at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

			June 30, 2018
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
Due in less than one year	$	1,750	$	—	$	23	$	1,727
Due in one to five years		5,000		—		94		4,906
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		220,057		23		5,965		214,115
Commercial MBS		13,035		—		421		12,614
CMO		85,488		35		2,398		83,125
Corporate Note
Due in five to ten years		10,044		—		20		10,024
	$	335,374	$	58	$	8,921	$	326,511

			June 30, 2017
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
Due in one to five years	$	6,750	$	—	$	54	$	6,696
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		141,990		81		1,391		140,680
Commercial MBS		13,473		112		83		13,502
CMO		77,418		—		1,092		76,326
	$	239,631	$	193	$	2,620	$	237,204

Gross Unrealized Losses on Securities Held to Maturity and Fair Value of Related Securites

Gross unrealized losses on securities held to maturity and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

	June 30, 2018
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value			Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations		$	—	$	—	$	6,633	$	117	$	6,633	$	117
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			188,281		4,646		24,712		1,319		212,993		5,965
Commercial MBS			8,290		224		4,324		197		12,614		421
CMO			9,106		279		48,211		2,119		57,317		2,398
Corporate Note			10,024		20		—		—		10,024		20
		$	215,701	$	5,169	$	83,880	$	3,752	$	299,581	$	8,921

	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value			Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations		$	1,737	$	13	$	4,959	$	41	$	6,696	$	54
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS			128,040		1,265		3,020		126		131,060		1,391
Commercial MBS			7,120		83		—		—		7,120		83
CMO			76,326		1,092		—		—		76,326		1,092
		$	213,223	$	2,453	$	7,979	$	167	$	221,202	$	2,620

XML

Securities Available for Sale (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Securities Available for Sale [Abstract]

Summary of Securities Available for Sale

The following is a comparative summary of securities available for sale at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:

	June 30, 2018
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	601	$	964	$	—	$	1,565
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		70		1		—		71
Commercial MBS		4,074		63		—		4,137
CMO		40,106		—		1,188		38,918
	$	44,851	$	1,028	$	1,188	$	44,691

	June 30, 2017
	Amortized cost		Gross unrealized gains		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value
	(In thousands)
Equity securities	$	601	$	897	$	—	$	1,498
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		6,974		9		62		6,921
Commercial MBS		4,220		186		—		4,406
CMO		85,437		152		484		85,105
	$	97,232	$	1,244	$	546	$	97,930

Gross Unrealized Losses on Securities Available for Sale

Gross unrealized losses on securities available for sale and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 were as follows:

	June 30, 2018
	Less than 12 months				Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities:
CMO	$	20,651	$	444	$	18,267	$	744	$	38,918	$	1,188
	$	20,651	$	444	$	18,267	$	744	$	38,918	$	1,188

	June 30, 2017
	Less than 12 months				Greater than 12 months				Total
	Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses		Fair value		Gross unrealized losses
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities:
Residential MBS		6,521		62		—		—		6,521		62
CMO		53,880		406		4,877		78		58,757		484
	$	60,401	$	468	$	4,877	$	78	$	65,278	$	546

XML

Accrued Interest Receivable (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Accrued Interest Receivable [Abstract]

Summary of Accrued Interest Receivable

A summary of accrued interest receivable at June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Mortgage Loans	$	10,446	$	9,976
Investment Securities		815		644
	$	11,261	$	10,620

XML

Office Properties and Equipment (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Office Properties and Equipment [Abstract]

Office Properties and Equipment, Less Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization

At June 30, 2018 and 2017, office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, consist of the following:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cost:
Land	$	4,171	$	4,171
Buildings		10,073		10,073
Land and building improvements		5,698		5,470
Leasehold improvements		1,763		1,754
Furniture and equipment		6,282		6,451
Construction in progress		50		248
		28,037		28,167
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		14,582		14,258
Office properties and equipment, net	$	13,455	$	13,909

XML

Deposits (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Deposits [Abstract]

Summary of Deposit Balances

Deposit balances are summarized as follows:

	2018					2017
	Amount		Weighted average cost			Amount		Weighted average cost
	(Dollars in thousands)
Checking accounts	$	751,735		0.85	%	$	706,554		0.62	%
Money market deposit accounts		763,003		1.13	%		847,888		1.05	%
Savings accounts		188,859		0.28	%		177,896		0.23	%
Time deposits		1,211,531		1.62	%		1,124,140		1.34	%
	$	2,915,128		1.21	%	$	2,856,478		1.01	%

Summary of Interest Expense on Deposits

Interest expense on deposits for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows:

	2018		2017		2016
	(In thousands)
Checking accounts	$	4,955	$	3,015	$	1,666
Money market deposit accounts		9,038		7,742		5,034
Savings accounts		455		391		380
Time deposits		17,176		13,523		10,804
	$	31,624	$	24,671	$	17,884

Time Deposits

Time deposits at June 30, 2018 mature as follows (in thousands):

Year ending June 30:
2019	$	781,699
2020		280,465
2021		69,340
2022		66,912
2023 and beyond		13,115
	$	1,211,531

XML

Income Taxes (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 consists of the following:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Current:
Federal	$	18,153		$	24,641		$	24,145
State		4,200			2,723			4,160
Total current		22,353			27,364			28,305
Deferred:
Federal		11,061			(776	)		765
State		(2,298	)		(206	)		(536	)
Total deferred		8,763			(982	)		229
Total income tax expense	$	31,116		$	26,382		$	28,534

Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation

A reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected amount (computed by multiplying income before provision for income taxes times the applicable statutory federal income tax rate) for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Income before provision for income taxes	$	74,010		$	75,526		$	80,829
Applicable statutory federal income tax rate		28	%		35	%		35	%
Computed "expected" federal income tax expense		20,723			26,434			28,290
Increase (decrease) in federal income tax expense resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit		2,339			1,636			2,356
Bank owned life insurance		(698	)		(916	)		(951	)
ESOP fair market value adjustment		484			723			733
ESOP unallocated dividend		(631	)		(455	)		(403	)
Non-deductible compensation		—			146			194
Stock based compensation		(1,122	)		(1,430	)		(2,118	)
Impact of tax reform		10,165			—			—
Other items, net		(144	)		244			433
Total income tax expense	$	31,116		$	26,382		$	28,534

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act").  Among numerous provisions included in the Act was the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. Because the Company has a fiscal year end of June 30, the reduced corporate tax rate will result in the application of a blended federal statutory tax rate of 28% for its fiscal year 2018. Applying the blended statutory tax rate to the results for the September 30, 2017 quarterly period resulted in a $1.3 million reduction being recognized in the December 31, 2017 quarterly period.

While the Act will lower the Company's future tax rate, in accordance with ASC 740 companies are required to re-measure deferred tax balances using the new enacted tax rates to account for the future impact of lower corporate tax rates on these deferred amounts.  The Company re-measured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future. The tax expense recorded in the December 31, 2017 quarterly period relating to the remeasurement of the Company's deferred tax balances is $10.2 million. The Company is still analyzing certain aspects of the Act and refining calculations, which could potentially affect the re-measurement of these balances.  The future impact of the Act may differ due to, among other things, changes in interpretations, assumptions made, the issuance of additional guidance, and actions we may take as a result of the Act.

The effective tax rates for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were 42.04%, 34.93% and 35.30%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended June 30, 2018 was elevated due to adjustments necessitated by the Act. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 during the quarter ended June 30, 2016June 30, 2016, retroactively effective July 1, 2015.  As a result of the new guidance, excess tax benefits from exercise or vesting of share-based awards are now included as a reduction in income tax expense, as discrete items, in the period in which the exercise or vesting occurs.  This impacts the effective tax rate in each reporting period; however, these discrete items are not included in the projected annual effective tax rate calculation.

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are as follows:

	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan and real estate owned losses	$	8,589	$	12,101
Postretirement benefits		10,242		13,973
Accrued/deferred compensation		7,554		9,598
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released		875		1,211
Stock compensation		1,914		3,772
Other than temporary loss on securities		64		96
State net operating loss carry forward		1,704		373
Other		494		271
Total deferred tax asset		31,436		41,395
Deferred tax liabilities:
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale		—		301
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap		5,158		2,776
Other		414		625
Total deferred tax liabilities		5,572		3,702
Net deferred tax asset	$	25,864	$	37,693

XML

Borrowings (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Borrowings [Abstract]

Borrowings by Stated Maturity and by Maturity or Put Date

	Stated Maturity
Year ending June 30:
2019	$	193,735
2020		97,418
2021		99,648
2022		110,650
2023		58,426
2025		36,495
	$	596,372

XML

Derivatives and Hedging Activities (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Derivatives and Hedging Activities [Abstract]

Amounts Included in Balance Sheets Related to Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments

The following table presents information regarding our derivative financial instruments at June 30, 2018 and 2017.

		At June 30, 2018					At June 30, 2017
Balance Sheet Line Item		Notional Amount			Fair Value		Notional Amount			Fair Value
Cash flow hedge interest rate swaps
Gross unrealized gain	Other Assets	$	405,000		$	16,789	$	450,000		$	6,437
Gross notional / net fair value		$	405,000		$	16,789	$	450,000		$	6,437
Average rate paid for the year ended			1.96	%				1.26	%
Average rate received for the year ended			2.06	%				0.72	%
Weighted average maturity (in years)			3.9					5.4

Gains (Losses) Related to Cash Flow Hedge Interest Rate Swaps

Gains (losses) included in the consolidated statements of income and in comprehensive income, on a pre-tax basis, related to cash flow hedge interest rate swaps are as follows:

	Year ended June 30,
	2018		2017
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense	$	133	$	(2,523	)
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income		10,485		13,297
Amount of loss recognized in the consolidated statements of income		—		(7,670	)

XML

Employee Benefit Plans (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Employee Benefit Plans [Abstract]

Information Regarding BEP Plan, Retirement Plan and Medical Plan

The following table sets forth information regarding the BEP Plan, the Retirement Plan and the Medical Plan at June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands).

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan						Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017
Change in benefit obligation:
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of the year	$	1,386		$	1,388		$	5,858		$	5,756		$	5,567		$	6,583
Service cost		—			—			130			151			59			57
Interest cost		45			39			208			182			211			234
Actuarial (gain) loss		(25	)		(41	)		(518	)		(168	)		41			(1,273	)
Benefits paid		—			—			(90	)		(63	)		(76	)		(34	)
Discount rate change		—			—			—			—			—			—
Projected benefit obligation at end of the year	$	1,406		$	1,386		$	5,588		$	5,858		$	5,802		$	5,567
Reconciliation of plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Actual return on plan assets		—			—			—			—			—			—
Employer contributions		—			—			90			63			76			34
Benefits paid		—			—			(90	)		(63	)		(76	)		(34	)
Fair value of plan assets at end of the year	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Unfunded status at end of year	$	1,406		$	1,386		$	5,588		$	5,858		$	5,802		$	5,567

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Related to Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits, on a Pre-tax Basis

The unfunded BEP of $1.4 million and $1.4 million, Retirement Plan of $5.6 million and $5.9 million and Medical Plan of $5.8 million and $5.6 million at June 30, 2018 and 2017 respectively, are included in other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income related to pension and other postretirement benefits, on a pre-tax basis, at June 30, 2018 and 2017 are summarized in the following table (in thousands).

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan							Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2018				2017			2018			2017
Net actuarial loss/(gain)		$	238		$	299		$	(308	)		$	210		$	461		$	420
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income		$	238		$	299		$	(308	)		$	210		$	461		$	420

Schedule of Net Periodic Benefit Costs

Net periodic benefit costs for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, as well as costs that are expected to be amortized into expense in fiscal 2019, are presented in the following table.

	BEP Plan						Retirement Plan						Medical Plan
	2018		2017		2016		2018		2017		2016		2018		2017		2016
	(In thousands)
Service cost	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	130	$	151	$	174	$	59	$	57	$	77
Interest cost		45		39		48		208		182		227		211		234		235
Amortization of unrecognized:
Net loss		35		52		40		—		—		29		—		350		155
Total	$	80	$	91	$	88	$	338	$	333	$	430	$	270	$	641	$	467
Amounts expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2019:
Net loss		33						—						—
	$	33					$	—					$	—

Weighted Average Actuarial Assumptions Used in Plan Determinations

The weighted average actuarial assumptions used in the plan determinations at June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

	BEP Plan									Retirement Plan									Medical Plan
	2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016			2018			2017			2016
Discount Rate		3.84	%		3.34	%		2.94	%		4.01	%		3.65	%		3.23	%		4.09	%		3.82	%		3.58	%
Rate of compensation increase		—			—			—			2.25	%		2.25	%		2.00	%		—			—			—
Medical benefits cost rate of increase		—			—			—			—			—			—			5.00	%		5.00	%		5.00	%

Estimated Future Benefit Payments

Estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, are as follows (in thousands):

	BEP Plan		Retirement Plan		Medical Plan
2019	$	110	$	303	$	173
2020		110		302		243
2021		111		300		267
2022		111		297		267
2023		111		294		265
2024-2028		558		1,807		1,424

Effect of 1% Change in Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rate on Post-retirement Benefits

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects on post-retirement benefits (in thousands):

	1% increase		1% decrease
Effect on total service cost and interest cost	$	318		(231	)
Effect on post retirement benefits obligation	$	987		(785	)

XML

Stock Based Compensation (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Stock Based Compensation [Abstract]

Assumptions Used in Estimating Fair Value of Options Issued

The fair value of the options issued during the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016 were estimated using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following assumptions:

	2018	2017	2016
Option shares granted	70,000	20,000	20,000
Expected dividend yield	7.18%	5.35%	6.75%
Expected volatility	18.74%	20.81%	26.10%
Risk-free interest rate	2.75%	1.39%	2.03%
Expected option life	6.50	6.50	6.50

Summary of Stock Option Activity

The following is a summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for its options plan as of June 30, 2018 and changes therein during the year then ended:

	Number of Stock Options			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)
Outstanding at  June 30, 2017		3,729,033		$	2.59	$	11.70		3.4
Granted		70,000			0.89		15.40		10.0
Exercised		(1,123,738	)		2.39		10.79		1.1
Forfeited		(12,000	)		1.64		15.89		7.8
Expired		(63,432	)		2.27		11.36		1.6
Outstanding at  June 30, 2018		2,599,863		$	2.64	$	12.16		3.4
Exercisable at  June 30, 2018		2,501,464		$	2.70	$	12.05		3.2

Summary of Status and Changes of Restricted Stock Shares

The following is a summary of the status of the Company's restricted stock shares as of June 30, 2018 and changes therein during the year then ended:

	Number of Shares Awarded			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at June 30, 2017		35,934		$	15.60
Granted		—			—
Vested		(15,734	)		15.33
Forfeited		(6,000	)		15.89
Non-vested at June 30, 2018		14,200		$	15.78

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

Aggregate Minimum Lease Payments

Aggregate minimum lease payments for the remainder of the leases are as follows (in thousands):

Year ending June 30:
2019	$	769
2020		652
2021		521
2022		237
2023		158
Thereafter		34
	$	2,371

XML

Regulatory Capital Requirements (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Regulatory Capital Requirements [Abstract]

Summary of Actual Capital Amounts and Ratios

The following is a summary of the Company's actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, compared to the FRB minimum capital adequacy requirements.

	June 30, 2018
	Actual						Required
	Amount			Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)		$	548,122		14.82	%	$	166,458		4.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)			548,122		14.82			221,945		6.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)			578,685		15.64			295,926		8.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)			548,122		13.25			165,465		4.00
Capital conservation buffer			282,759		7.64			69,358		1.875

	June 30, 2017
	Actual					Required
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	555,703		15.02	%	$	166,443		4.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		555,703		15.02			221,924		6.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		585,975		15.84			295,898		8.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		555,703		13.51			164,562		4.00
Capital conservation buffer		290,077		7.84			46,234		1.250

The following is a summary of the Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, compared to the FDIC minimum capital adequacy requirements and the FDIC requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution.

	June 30, 2018
	Actual					Required					Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	470,857		12.73	%	$	166,431		4.50	%	$	240,401		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		470,857		12.73			221,908		6.00			295,878		8.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		501,419		13.56			295,878		8.00			369,847		10.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		470,857		11.38			165,438		4.00			206,797		5.00
Capital conservation buffer		205,541		5.56			69,346		1.875

	June 30, 2017
	Actual					Required					Well-Capitalized
	Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate			Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in thousands)
Common Equity Tier 1 ("CET1") (to risk weighted assets)	$	521,414		14.10	%	$	166,440		4.50	%	$	240,413		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)		521,414		14.10			221,919		6.00			295,893		8.00
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)		551,686		14.92			295,893		8.00			369,866		10.00
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets)		521,414		12.68			164,533		4.00			205,666		5.00
Capital conservation buffer		255,793		6.92			46,233		1.250

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 by level within the fair value hierarchy. There were no transfers between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the year ended June 30, 2018.

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2018		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Equity Securities	$	1,565	$	1,565	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
Residential MBS		71		—		71		—
Commercial MBS		4,137		—		4,137		—
CMO		38,918		—		38,918		—
Total securities available for sale		44,691		1,565		43,126		—
Interest rate swap		16,789		—		16,789		—
Total assets measured on a recurring basis		61,480		1,565		59,915		—

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2017		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Securities available for sale:
Equity Securities	$	1,498	$	1,498	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale
Residential MBS		6,921		—		6,921		—
Commercial MBS		4,406		—		4,406		—
CMO		85,105		—		85,105		—
Total securities available for sale		97,930		1,498		96,432		—
Interest rate swap		6,437		—		6,437		—
Total assets measured on a recurring basis		104,367		1,498		102,869		—

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

The following tables present the recorded amount of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and 2017 by level within the fair value hierarchy.

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2018			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans:
Other commercial real estate		$	1,056		$	—		$	—		$	1,056
Total impaired loans			1,056			—			—			1,056
Real estate owned
Other commercial real estate			1,564			—			—			1,564
Total real estate owned			1,564			—			—			1,564
Total assets measured on a nonrecurring basis		$	2,620		$	—		$	—		$	2,620

	Fair Value as of June 30, 2017			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Impaired loans:
Residential		$	59		$	—		$	—		$	59
Other commercial real estate			2,907			—			—			2,907
Total impaired loans			2,966			—			—			2,966
Real estate owned
Other commercial real estate			140			—			—			140
Total real estate owned			140			—			—			140
Total assets measured on a nonrecurring basis		$	3,106		$	—		$	—		$	3,106

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following tables present the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments not recorded at fair values in their entirety on a recurring basis on the Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2018 and 2017.  These tables exclude financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value.  Financial instruments for which the carrying amount approximates fair value include cash and cash equivalents, FHLB stock, non-maturity deposits, overnight borrowings, and accrued interest.

	At June 30, 2018				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	335,374	$	326,511	$	—	$	326,511	$	—
Loans, net (1)		3,540,903		3,470,434		—		—		3,470,434
Financial liabilities:
Term deposits		1,211,531		1,219,558		—		1,219,558		—
Term borrowings		497,372		486,278		—		486,278		—

(1) Comprised of loans (including impaired loans), net of deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses.

	At June 30, 2017				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Financial assets:
Securities held to maturity	$	239,631	$	237,204	$	—	$	237,204	$	—
Loans, net (1)		3,566,703		3,532,998		—		—		3,532,998
Financial assets:
Term deposits		1,124,140		1,134,628		—		1,134,628		—
Term borrowings		489,859		487,305		—		487,305		—

(1) Comprised of loans (including impaired loans), net of deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses.

XML

Parent Company Only Financial Statements (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Parent Company Only Financial Statements [Abstract]

Condensed Financial Information for Oritani Financial Corp. - Balance Sheets

The following condensed financial information for Oritani Financial Corp. (parent company only) reflect the investment in its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Oritani Bank, Oritani, LLC and Hampshire Financial, LLC, using the equity method of accounting.

Balance Sheets

	June 30,
	2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Assets:
Cash	$	34	$	51
Fed Funds Sold		56,552		24,440
ESOP loan		19,703		21,449
Securities available for sale, at fair value		1,565		1,498
Accrued Interest Receivable		440		399
Investment in Subsidiaries		481,412		524,413
Other assets		—		37
Total Assets	$	559,706	$	572,287
Liabilities and Equity
Borrowings		—		12,500
Other liabilities		360		564
Total Equity		559,346		559,223
Total Liabilities and Equity	$	559,706	$	572,287

Condensed Financial Information for Oritani Financial Corp. - Statements of Income

Statements of Income

	Year Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Interest on mortgage loans	$	—		$	—		$	1,205
Interest on ESOP loan		845			815			838
Interest income on fed funds		377			295			176
Dividends/distributions from subsidiary		96,153			—			44,392
Gain on sale of securities		—			—			406
Other income		43			35			35
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		(53,243	)		49,286			13,563
Total income		44,175			50,431			60,615
Interest on borrowings		67			404			405
Other expenses		1,375			1,016			979
Income before income tax expense		42,733			49,011			59,231
Income tax (benefit) expense		(161	)		(133	)		6,936
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295

Condensed Financial Information for Oritani Financial Corp. - Statements of Cash Flows

Statements of Cash Flows

	Year Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	42,894		$	49,144		$	52,295
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sale of securities available for sale		—			—			(406	)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary		53,243			(49,286	)		(13,563	)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable		(41	)		12			118
Decrease in other assets		117			16			12
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		(308	)		121			(155	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		95,905			7			38,301
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale		—			—			1,013
Principal collected on ESOP loan		1,746			2,129			2,469
Decrease in mortgage loans, net		—			—			31,616
Net cash provided by investing activities		1,746			2,129			35,098
Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid to shareholders		(57,353	)		(51,850	)		(50,007	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(7,834	)		(1,574	)		(1,593	)
Stock issued upon exercise of stock options		12,131			9,567			14,705
Repayment of long term debt		(12,500	)		—			—
Cash used in financing activities		(65,556	)		(43,857	)		(36,895	)
Net change in cash and equivalents		32,095			(41,721	)		36,504
Cash at beginning of period		24,491			66,212			29,708
Cash at end of period	$	56,586		$	24,491		$	66,212

XML

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) [Abstract]

Summary of Quarterly Financial Data

The following tables are a summary of certain quarterly financial data for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

	Fiscal 2018 Quarter Ended
	September 30		December 31		March 31		June 30
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income	$	37,920	$	38,052	$	37,561	$	39,293
Interest expense		10,276		10,444		10,608		11,572
Net interest income		27,644		27,608		26,953		27,721
Provision for loan losses		—		—		—		—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		27,644		27,608		26,953		27,721
Other income		971		623		979		1,015
Other expense		9,512		10,213		9,760		10,019
Income before income tax expense		19,103		18,018		18,172		18,717
Income tax expense		7,107		14,048		4,747		5,214
Net income	$	11,996	$	3,970	$	13,425	$	13,503
Basic Earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.09	$	0.30	$	0.30
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	0.27	$	0.09	$	0.30	$	0.30

	Fiscal 2017 Quarter Ended
	September 30		December 31		March 31		June 30(1)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income	$	34,060	$	35,251	$	36,586	$	36,565
Interest expense		8,760		9,022		9,791		10,278
Net interest income		25,300		26,229		26,795		26,287
Provision for loan losses		—		—		—		—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		25,300		26,229		26,795		26,287
Other income		1,258		1,183		21,741		(7,338	)
Other expense		10,268		11,058		9,893		14,710
Income before income tax expense		16,290		16,354		38,643		4,239
Income tax expense		5,679		4,978		14,377		1,348
Net income	$	10,611	$	11,376	$	24,266	$	2,891
Basic Earnings per common share	$	0.25	$	0.26	$	0.56	$	0.07
Diluted Earnings per common share	$	0.24	$	0.26	$	0.54	$	0.06

(1) Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000.  These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure.  Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure.  See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

XML

Earnings Per Share (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Earnings Per Share [Abstract]

Summary of Earnings Per Share Calculations and Reconciliation of Basic to Diluted Earnings per Share

The following is a summary of the Company's earnings per share calculations and reconciliations of basic to diluted earnings per share.

	For the Years Ended June 30,
	2018		2017		2016
	(in thousands, except for per share data)
Net income	$	42,894	$	49,144	$	52,295
Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic		44,226		43,263		41,864
Effect of dilutive non-vested shares and stock options outstanding		848		1,246		1,411
Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted		45,074		44,509		43,275
Earnings per share-basic	$	0.97	$	1.14	$	1.25
Earnings per share-diluted	$	0.95	$	1.10	$	1.21

XML

Other Comprehensive Income (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Other Comprehensive Income [Abstract]

Components of Comprehensive Income, both Gross and Net of Tax

The components of comprehensive income, both gross and net of tax, are presented for the periods below (in thousands):

	Years ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2016
Gross:
Net income	$	74,010		$	75,526		$	80,829
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(1,182	)		(2,795	)		1,011
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		324			883			(990	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		10,352			15,820			(13,936	)
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		35			402			224
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			8,112			—
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		503			1,482			(797	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		10,032			23,904			(14,488	)
Total comprehensive income		84,042			99,430			66,341
Tax applicable to:
Net income		31,116			26,382			28,534
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(437	)		(1,202	)		416
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		140			381			(428	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		3,556			6,839			(6,020	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			3,498			—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		14			156			95
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		156			640			(327	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		3,429			10,312			(6,264	)
Total comprehensive income		34,545			36,694			22,270
Net of tax:
Net income		42,894			49,144			52,295
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale		(745	)		(1,593	)		595
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income		184			502			(562	)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps		6,796			8,981			(7,916	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income		—			4,614			—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations		21			246			129
Change in funded status of retirement obligations		347			842			(470	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		6,603			13,592			(8,224	)
Total comprehensive income	$	49,497		$	62,736		$	44,071

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax

The following table presents the changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):

	Unrealized Holding Gains on Securities Available for Sale			Post Retirement Obligations			Unrealized Holding Gains on Interest Rate Swaps			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	438		$	(569	)	$	3,651		$	3,520
Net change		(561	)		368			6,796			6,603
Reclassification due to adoption of ASU No. 2018-02		37			(113	)		1,176			1,100
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	(86	)	$	(314	)	$	11,623		$	11,223
Balance at June 30, 2016	$	1,529		$	(1,657	)	$	(9,944	)	$	(10,072	)
Net change		(1,091	)		1,088			13,595			13,592
Balance at June 30, 2017	$	438		$	(569	)	$	3,651		$	3,520

Information about Amount of Reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table sets forth information about the amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to the consolidated statement of income and the affected line item in the statement where net income is presented (in thousands).

		Year ended June 30,
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Component	Affected line item in the Consolidated Statement of Income	2018		2017		2016
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income	Net loss (gain) on sale of securities	$	324	$	883	$	(990	)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income	Net loss on termination of derivatives		—		8,112		—
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations (1)
Net loss			35		402		224
Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits			35		402		224
Total before tax			359		9,397		(766	)
Income tax expense (benefit)			154		4,035		(333	)
Net of tax		$	205	$	5,362	$	(433	)

(1) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computations of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 14, Postretirement Benefits.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) $ in Millions	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018 USD ($)
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Line Items]
Period of delinquency after which a loan is placed on non-accrual status	90 days
Period of performance under modified terms after which a loan is not considered restructured	6 months
Savings Incentive Plan [Member]
Employee Benefit Plans [Abstract]
Percentage of employees' gross pay for employer matching contributions	6.00%
Minimum [Member]
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Line Items]
Balance of loans individually classified as impaired	$ 1.0
Maximum [Member]
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Line Items]
Balance of loans individually classified as impaired based on conditions	$ 1.0
Land Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Useful life	15 years
Building and Major Building Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Useful life	40 years
Minor Building Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Useful life	10 years
Furniture And Fixtures [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Useful life	3 years
Furniture And Fixtures [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Useful life	7 years
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York [Member]
Federal Home Loan Bank, Advances, Branch of FHLB Bank [Line Items]
Mortgage related assets	0.20%
Advances	4.50%
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Federal Home Loan Bank, Advances, Branch of FHLB Bank [Line Items]
Mortgage related assets	0.10%
Advances	4.00%
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Federal Home Loan Bank, Advances, Branch of FHLB Bank [Line Items]
Mortgage related assets	0.25%
Advances	5.00%
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ESOP) [Member]
Employee Benefit Plans [Abstract]
Repayment period for borrowed funds	25 years

XML

Stock Repurchase Program (Details) - Stock Repurchase Program [Member] - $ / shares	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 04, 2015
Schedule of Capitalization, Equity [Line Items]
Number of outstanding shares authorized to be repurchased (in shares)		2,205,451
Percentage of outstanding shares authorized to be repurchased		5.00%
Shares acquired under repurchase programs (in shares)	13,277,681
Weighted average cost of shares acquired under repurchase programs (in dollars per share)	$ 13.30
Number of shares yet to be repurchased (in shares)	1,888,851

XML

Cash and Cash Equivalents (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018
Cash and Cash Equivalents [Abstract]
Period of sales for federal funds sold and short term investments included in cash and cash equivalents	1 day

XML

Loans (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Summary of Loans [Abstract]
Total loans	$ 3,578,343	$ 3,605,210
Less [Abstract]
Deferred loan fees, net	6,878	8,235
Allowance for loan losses	30,562	30,272	$ 29,951	$ 30,889
Loans, net	3,540,903	3,566,703
Fxed-rate mortgage commitments	32,900	2,200
Variable-rate mortgage commitments	25,700	65,500
Aggregate amount of loans to executive officers	21,500	22,100
New loans to executive officers	305	2,300
Repayments from executive officers	$ 864	13,600
Minimum [Member]
Less [Abstract]
Interest rate of fixed rate commitments	3.75%
Maximum [Member]
Less [Abstract]
Interest rate of fixed rate commitments	5.50%
Residential [Member]
Summary of Loans [Abstract]
Total loans	$ 267,771	253,310
Less [Abstract]
Allowance for loan losses	1,990	1,261	1,300	1,521
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Summary of Loans [Abstract]
Total loans	2,005,315	1,945,297
Less [Abstract]
Allowance for loan losses	17,259	15,794	12,837	10,814
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Summary of Loans [Abstract]
Total loans	497,708	535,567
Less [Abstract]
Allowance for loan losses	3,015	3,000	3,646	4,042
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Summary of Loans [Abstract]
Total loans	796,589	866,826
Less [Abstract]
Allowance for loan losses	7,828	10,017	11,850	13,943
Construction and Land Loans [Member]
Summary of Loans [Abstract]
Total loans	10,960	4,210
Less [Abstract]
Allowance for loan losses	$ 470	$ 200	$ 318	$ 569

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Line Items]
Percentage of loans reviewed by third party firm on an annual basis									65.00%
Period of delinquency after which a loan is considered impaired									90 days
Look back period used in measuring historical charge-offs									8 years
Activity in allowance for loan losses [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period				$ 30,272				$ 29,951	$ 30,272	$ 29,951	$ 30,889
Provisions charged to operations	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	0	0	0
Recoveries									407	409	9
Loans charged off									(117)	(88)	(947)
Balance at end of period	30,562				$ 30,272				30,562	$ 30,272	$ 29,951
Minimum [Member]
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Line Items]
Balance of construction loans reviewed by third party firm	250								250
Balance of classified CRE loans reviewed by third party firm	250								250
Balance of loans individually classified as impaired	$ 1,000								$ 1,000
Loss emergence period used in measuring historical charge-offs									12 months
Maximum [Member]
Financing Receivable, Allowance for Credit Losses [Line Items]
Loss emergence period used in measuring historical charge-offs									33 months

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses, by Loan Category (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period				$ 30,272				$ 29,951	$ 30,272	$ 29,951	$ 30,889
Charge-offs									(117)	(88)	(947)
Recoveries									407	409	9
Provisions charged to operations	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	0	0	0	0
Balance at end of period	30,562				30,272				30,562	30,272	29,951
Residential [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period				1,261				1,300	1,261	1,300	1,521
Charge-offs									(117)	(75)	(98)
Recoveries									150	0	0
Provisions charged to operations									696	36	(123)
Balance at end of period	1,990				1,261				1,990	1,261	1,300
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period				15,794				12,837	15,794	12,837	10,814
Charge-offs									0	0	0
Recoveries									0	0	0
Provisions charged to operations									1,465	2,957	2,023
Balance at end of period	17,259				15,794				17,259	15,794	12,837
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period				3,000				3,646	3,000	3,646	4,042
Charge-offs									0	0	0
Recoveries									0	0	0
Provisions charged to operations									15	(646)	(396)
Balance at end of period	3,015				3,000				3,015	3,000	3,646
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period				10,017				11,850	10,017	11,850	13,943
Charge-offs									0	(13)	(849)
Recoveries									225	409	9
Provisions charged to operations									(2,414)	(2,229)	(1,253)
Balance at end of period	7,828				10,017				7,828	10,017	11,850
Construction and Land Loans [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Balance at beginning of period				$ 200				$ 318	200	318	569
Charge-offs									0	0	0
Recoveries									32	0	0
Provisions charged to operations									238	(118)	(251)
Balance at end of period	$ 470				$ 200				$ 470	$ 200	$ 318

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses, Loans Receivable and Related Allowance by Portfolio Segment Based on Impairment Method (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	$ 0	$ 43
Collectively evaluated for impairment	30,562	30,229
Total	30,562	30,272	$ 29,951	$ 30,889
Loans receivable [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	9,203	13,857
Collectively evaluated for impairment	3,569,140	3,591,353
Total loans	3,578,343	3,605,210
Residential [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	0
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,990	1,261
Total	1,990	1,261	1,300	1,521
Loans receivable [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	5,022	3,684
Collectively evaluated for impairment	262,749	249,626
Total loans	267,771	253,310
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	0
Collectively evaluated for impairment	17,259	15,794
Total	17,259	15,794	12,837	10,814
Loans receivable [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	0
Collectively evaluated for impairment	2,005,315	1,945,297
Total loans	2,005,315	1,945,297
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	0
Collectively evaluated for impairment	3,015	3,000
Total	3,015	3,000	3,646	4,042
Loans receivable [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	0
Collectively evaluated for impairment	497,708	535,567
Total loans	497,708	535,567
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	43
Collectively evaluated for impairment	7,828	9,974
Total	7,828	10,017	11,850	13,943
Loans receivable [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	4,181	10,173
Collectively evaluated for impairment	792,408	856,653
Total loans	796,589	866,826
Construction and Land Loans [Member]
Allowance for credit losses [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	0
Collectively evaluated for impairment	470	200
Total	470	200	$ 318	$ 569
Loans receivable [Abstract]
Individually evaluated for impairment	0	0
Collectively evaluated for impairment	10,960	4,210
Total loans	$ 10,960	$ 4,210

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses, Credit Quality Indicators (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	$ 3,578,343	$ 3,605,210
Satisfactory [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	3,418,723	3,407,403
Pass/Watch [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	133,113	152,283
Special Mention [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	14,902	21,970
Substandard [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	11,605	23,554
Doubtful [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Residential [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	267,771	253,310
Residential [Member] | Satisfactory [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	242,534	229,481
Residential [Member] | Pass/Watch [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	18,731	17,256
Residential [Member] | Special Mention [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	171	1,571
Residential [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	6,335	5,002
Residential [Member] | Doubtful [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	2,005,315	1,945,297
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Satisfactory [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	1,981,781	1,915,526
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Pass/Watch [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	21,952	27,778
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Special Mention [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	1,582	1,753
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	240
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Doubtful [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	497,708	535,567
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Satisfactory [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	494,723	532,472
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Pass/Watch [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Special Mention [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	2,985	3,095
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Doubtful [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	796,589	866,826
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Satisfactory [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	688,725	725,714
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Pass/Watch [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	92,430	107,249
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Special Mention [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	10,164	15,551
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	5,270	18,312
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Doubtful [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Construction and Land Loans [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	10,960	4,210
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | Satisfactory [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	10,960	4,210
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | Pass/Watch [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | Special Mention [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | Substandard [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	0	0
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | Doubtful [Member]
Loan credit quality [Abstract]
Total loans	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses, Past Due (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018		Jun. 30, 2017		Jun. 30, 2016
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	$ 11,389		$ 6,376
Current	3,566,954		3,598,834
Total loans	3,578,343		3,605,210
Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual	7,877	[1]	10,223	[2]	$ 9,968
Interest income not recognized on nonaccrual loans	198		283		$ 555
30 to 59 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	5,287		2,089
60 to 89 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	753		1,776
90 Days or More Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	5,349		2,511
Residential [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	8,662		3,633
Current	259,109		249,677
Total loans	267,771		253,310
Residential [Member] | Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Current	504		21
Nonaccrual	6,335	[1]	1,556	[2]
Residential [Member] | 30 to 59 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	2,696		1,243
Residential [Member] | 30 to 59 Days Past Due [Member] | Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	35		716
Residential [Member] | 60 to 89 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	753		1,776
Residential [Member] | 60 to 89 Days Past Due [Member] | Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	582		205
Residential [Member] | 90 Days or More Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	5,213		614
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	1,582		240
Current	2,003,733		1,945,057
Total loans	2,005,315		1,945,297
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Current	0		0
Nonaccrual	0	[1]	0	[2]
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 30 to 59 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	1,582		240
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 60 to 89 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Residential Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 90 Days or More Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Current	497,708		535,567
Total loans	497,708		535,567
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual	0	[1]	0	[2]
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 30 to 59 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 60 to 89 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Grocery/Credit Retail Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 90 Days or More Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	1,145		2,503
Current	795,444		864,323
Total loans	796,589		866,826
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Current	1,407		6,770
Nonaccrual	1,542	[1]	8,667	[2]
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 30 to 59 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	1,009		606
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 60 to 89 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | 90 Days or More Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	136		1,897
Construction and Land Loans [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Current	10,960		4,210
Total loans	10,960		4,210
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | Nonaccrual Status [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Nonaccrual	0	[1]	0	[2]
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | 30 to 59 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | 60 to 89 Days Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	0		0
Construction and Land Loans [Member] | 90 Days or More Past Due [Member]
Financing Receivable, Recorded Investment, Past Due [Line Items]
Total past due	$ 0		$ 0

[1] Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2018 are residential loans totaling $35,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $582,000 that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $504,000 and other CRE loans totaling $1.4 million that were less than 30 days past due.

[2] Included in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2017 are residential loans totaling $716,000 that were 30-59 days past due; residential loans totaling $205,000 that were 60-89 days past due; and residential loans totaling $21,000 and other CRE loans totaling $6.8 million that were less than 30 days past due.

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses, Impaired Loans (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
With no related allowance recorded [Abstract]
Recorded investment	$ 9,039	$ 13,319
Unpaid principal balance	9,203	13,319	$ 12,664
Average recorded investment	8,931	12,503
Interest income recognized	450	706
With an allowance recorded [Abstract]
Recorded investment		495
Unpaid principal balance		538	487
Average recorded investment		554
Interest income recognized		0
Recorded investment	9,039	13,814
Unpaid principal balance	9,203	13,857	13,151
Allowance	0	43	118
Average recorded investment	8,931	13,057	13,364
Interest income recognized	450	706	$ 409
Cash basis interest income	415	611
Residential [Member]
With no related allowance recorded [Abstract]
Recorded investment	5,021	3,684
Unpaid principal balance	5,022	3,684
Average recorded investment	4,614	3,655
Interest income recognized	64	146
With an allowance recorded [Abstract]
Recorded investment	5,021	3,684
Unpaid principal balance	5,022	3,684
Allowance	0	0
Average recorded investment	4,614	3,655
Interest income recognized	64	146
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
With no related allowance recorded [Abstract]
Recorded investment	4,018	9,635
Unpaid principal balance	4,181	9,635
Average recorded investment	4,317	8,848
Interest income recognized	386	560
With an allowance recorded [Abstract]
Recorded investment		495
Unpaid principal balance		538
Average recorded investment		554
Interest income recognized		0
Recorded investment	4,018	10,130
Unpaid principal balance	4,181	10,173
Allowance	0	43
Average recorded investment	4,317	9,402
Interest income recognized	$ 386	$ 560

XML

Allowance for Loan Losses, Troubled Debt Restructurings (Details) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018 USD ($) Contract	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($) Contract	Jun. 30, 2016 USD ($) Contract
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Period of performance under modified terms after which a loan is not considered restructured	6 months
Troubled debt restructurings	$ 1,890	$ 4,610
Troubled debt restructurings, allowance	$ 0	$ 43
Number of relationships | Contract	1	2	1
Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment	$ 271	$ 1,252	$ 3,385
Post-modification outstanding recorded investment	$ 249	$ 1,167	$ 2,266
Number of TDRs that have subsequently defaulted | Contract	0
Loans restructured during past twelve months that have resulted in charge off	$ 0
Interest Only [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Number of relationships | Contract	1	1
Reduced Rate [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Number of relationships | Contract	0	1
Extended Maturity [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Number of relationships | Contract	0	0
Performing [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	$ 309	$ 362
Troubled debt restructurings, allowance	0	0
Nonperforming [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	1,581	4,248
Troubled debt restructurings, allowance	0	43
Residential [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	174	178
Residential [Member] | Performing [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	0	0
Residential [Member] | Nonperforming [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	174	178
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	$ 1,716	$ 4,432
Number of relationships | Contract	1	2	1
Pre-modification outstanding recorded investment	$ 271	$ 1,252	$ 3,385
Post-modification outstanding recorded investment	249	1,167	$ 2,266
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Performing [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	309	362
Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Nonperforming [Member]
Financing Receivable, Modifications [Line Items]
Troubled debt restructurings	$ 1,407	$ 4,070

XML

Securities Held to Maturity (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Amortized cost	$ 335,374	$ 239,631
Gross unrealized gains	58	193
Gross unrealized losses	8,921	2,620
Fair value	326,511	237,204
Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity	0	1,995	$ 0
Held-to-maturity securities sold at amortized cost	0	1,900	0
Held to maturity securities sold at gross realized gain	0	57	0
Held to maturity securities sold at gross realized losses	0	0	0
Other-than-temporary impairment charges on securities held to maturity	$ 0	0	$ 0
Minimum [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity	20 years
FHLBNY [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Fair value of deposits collateralized through letters of credit	$ 217,000
Advances [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Fair value of held-for-sale securities pledged as collateral	9,100	27,200
Interest Rate Swaps [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Fair value of held to maturity securities pledged as collateral	0	8,500
Municipal Deposits [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Fair value of held-for-sale securities pledged as collateral	0
Fair value of held to maturity securities pledged as collateral		132,500
Held-to-maturity Securities [Member] | Interest Rate Swaps [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Fair value of held to maturity securities pledged as collateral	0	8,500
U.S. Government and Federal Agency Obligations [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Amortized cost, due in less than one year	1,750
Gross unrealized gains, due in less than one year	0
Gross unrealized losses, due in less than one year	23
Fair value, due in less than one year	1,727
Amortized cost, due in one to five years	5,000	6,750
Gross unrealized gains, due in one to five years	0	0
Gross unrealized losses, due in one to five years	94	54
Fair value, due in one to five years	4,906	6,696
Residential MBS [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Amortized cost	220,057	141,990
Gross unrealized gains	23	81
Gross unrealized losses	5,965	1,391
Fair value	214,115	140,680
Commercial MBS [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Amortized cost	13,035	13,473
Gross unrealized gains	0	112
Gross unrealized losses	421	83
Fair value	12,614	13,502
CMO [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Amortized cost	85,488	77,418
Gross unrealized gains	35	0
Gross unrealized losses	2,398	1,092
Fair value	83,125	$ 76,326
Corporate Note [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities [Abstract]
Amortized cost, due in five to ten years	10,044
Gross unrecognized gains, due in five to ten years	0
Gross unrecognized losses, due in five to ten years	20
Fair value, due in five to ten years	$ 10,024

XML

Securities Held to Maturity, Gross Unrealized Losses (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	$ 215,701	$ 213,223
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	83,880	7,979
Total, Fair value	299,581	221,202
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	5,169	2,453
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	3,752	167
Total, Gross unrealized losses	8,921	2,620
Corporate Note [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	10,024
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	0
Total, Fair value	10,024
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	20
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	0
Total, Gross unrealized losses	20
U.S. Government and Federal Agency Obligations [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	0	1,737
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	6,633	4,959
Total, Fair value	6,633	6,696
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	0	13
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	117	41
Total, Gross unrealized losses	117	54
Residential MBS [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	188,281	128,040
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	24,712	3,020
Total, Fair value	212,993	131,060
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	4,646	1,265
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	1,319	126
Total, Gross unrealized losses	5,965	1,391
Commercial MBS [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	8,290	7,120
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	4,324	0
Total, Fair value	12,614	7,120
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	224	83
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	197	0
Total, Gross unrealized losses	421	83
CMO [Member]
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	9,106	76,326
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	48,211	0
Total, Fair value	57,317	76,326
Held-to-maturity Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	279	1,092
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	2,119	0
Total, Gross unrealized losses	$ 2,398	$ 1,092

XML

Securities Available for Sale (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Amortized cost	$ 44,851	$ 97,232
Gross unrealized gains	1,028	1,244
Gross unrealized losses	1,188	546
Fair value	44,691	97,930
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale	29,505	55,093	$ 100,468
Available for sale securities sold at amortized cost	29,800	56,000	99,500
Gross realized gains for available for sale securities	0	28	993
Gross realized losses for available for sale securities	324	911	3
Other-than-temporary impairment charges on available for sale securities	0	0	$ 0
Fair value of available-for-sale securities pledged as collateral	$ 15,500	31,600
Minimum [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities available for sale	20 years
Interest Rate Swaps [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Fair value of available-for-sale securities pledged as collateral	$ 0	0
FHLBNY [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Fair value of available-for-sale securities pledged as collateral	217,000
Fair value of deposits collateralized through letters of credit	217,000
Municipal Deposits [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Fair value of available-for-sale securities pledged as collateral	0	59,500
Equity Securities [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Amortized cost	601	601
Gross unrealized gains	964	897
Gross unrealized losses	0	0
Fair value	1,565	1,498
Residential MBS [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Amortized cost	70	6,974
Gross unrealized gains	1	9
Gross unrealized losses	0	62
Fair value	71	6,921
Commercial MBS [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Amortized cost	4,074	4,220
Gross unrealized gains	63	186
Gross unrealized losses	0	0
Fair value	4,137	4,406
CMO [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Fair Value to Amortized Cost Basis [Abstract]
Amortized cost	40,106	85,437
Gross unrealized gains	0	152
Gross unrealized losses	1,188	484
Fair value	$ 38,918	$ 85,105

XML

Securities Available for Sale, Gross Unrealized Losses (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Available-for-sale Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	$ 20,651	$ 60,401
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	18,267	4,877
Total, Fair value	38,918	65,278
Available-for-sale Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	444	468
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	744	78
Total, Gross unrealized losses	1,188	546
Residential MBS [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value		6,521
Greater than 12 months, Fair value		0
Total, Fair value		6,521
Available-for-sale Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses		62
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses		0
Total, Gross unrealized losses		62
CMO [Member]
Available-for-sale Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Fair Value [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Fair value	20,651	53,880
Greater than 12 months, Fair value	18,267	4,877
Total, Fair value	38,918	58,757
Available-for-sale Securities, Continuous Unrealized Loss Position, Aggregate Loss [Abstract]
Less than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	444	406
Greater than 12 months, Gross unrealized losses	744	78
Total, Gross unrealized losses	$ 1,188	$ 484

XML

Accrued Interest Receivable (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Summary of accrued interest receivable [Abstract]
Accrued interest receivable	$ 11,261	$ 10,620
Mortgage Loans [Member]
Summary of accrued interest receivable [Abstract]
Accrued interest receivable	10,446	9,976
Investment Securities [Member]
Summary of accrued interest receivable [Abstract]
Accrued interest receivable	$ 815	$ 644

XML

Office Properties and Equipment (Details) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018 USD ($) Office	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2016 USD ($)
Office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization [Abstract]
Office properties and equipment, gross	$ 28,037	$ 28,167
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	14,582	14,258
Office properties and equipment, net	13,455	13,909
Depreciation and amortization expense	$ 810	864	$ 910
Number of full service branch offices | Office	25
Land [Member]
Office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization [Abstract]
Office properties and equipment, gross	$ 4,171	4,171
Buildings [Member]
Office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization [Abstract]
Office properties and equipment, gross	10,073	10,073
Land and Building Improvements [Member]
Office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization [Abstract]
Office properties and equipment, gross	5,698	5,470
Leasehold Improvements [Member]
Office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization [Abstract]
Office properties and equipment, gross	1,763	1,754
Furniture and Equipment [Member]
Office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization [Abstract]
Office properties and equipment, gross	6,282	6,451
Construction in Progress [Member]
Office properties and equipment, less accumulated depreciation and amortization [Abstract]
Office properties and equipment, gross	$ 50	$ 248

XML

Deposits (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Deposits [Abstract]
Interest-bearing domestic deposit, brokered	$ 450,400	$ 510,400
Brokered time deposits	$ 0	$ 38,900
Weighted average interest rates, brokered time deposits	0.00%	1.34%
Weighted average maturities, brokered time deposits	0 years	1 month 6 days
Deposit balances, amount [Abstract]
Checking accounts	$ 751,735	$ 706,554
Money market deposit accounts	763,003	847,888
Savings accounts	188,859	177,896
Time deposits	1,211,531	1,124,140
Deposits	$ 2,915,128	$ 2,856,478
Deposit balances, weighted average cost [Abstract]
Checking accounts	0.85%	0.62%
Money market deposit accounts	1.13%	1.05%
Savings accounts	0.28%	0.23%
Time deposits	1.62%	1.34%
Weighted average cost, deposits	1.21%	1.01%
Interest expense on deposits [Abstract]
Checking accounts	$ 4,955	$ 3,015	$ 1,666
Money market deposit accounts	9,038	7,742	5,034
Savings accounts	455	391	380
Time deposits	17,176	13,523	10,804
Interest expense on deposits	31,624	24,671	$ 17,884
Time deposits, fiscal year maturity [Abstract]
2019	781,699
2020	280,465
2021	69,340
2022	66,912
2023 and beyond	13,115
Time deposits	1,211,531	1,124,140
Time deposits of $250,000 or more	$ 244,700	$ 221,800

XML

Income Taxes (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended									6 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Current [Abstract]
Federal											$ 18,153	$ 24,641	$ 24,145
State											4,200	2,723	4,160
Total current											22,353	27,364	28,305
Deferred [Abstract]
Federal											11,061	(776)	765
State											(2,298)	(206)	(536)
Total deferred											8,763	(982)	229
Total income tax expense	$ 5,214	$ 4,747	$ 14,048	$ 7,107	$ 1,348		$ 14,377	$ 4,978	$ 5,679		31,116	26,382	28,534
Reconciliation between the provision for income taxes and the expected amount [Abstract]
Income before provision for income taxes	18,717	18,172	18,018	19,103	4,239	[1]	38,643	16,354	16,290		$ 74,010	$ 75,526	$ 80,829
Applicable statutory federal income tax rate										21.00%	28.00%	35.00%	35.00%
Computed "expected" federal income tax expense											$ 20,723	$ 26,434	$ 28,290
Increase (decrease) in federal income tax expense resulting from [Abstract]
State income taxes, net of federal benefit											2,339	1,636	2,356
Bank owned life insurance											(698)	(916)	(951)
ESOP fair market value adjustment											484	723	733
ESOP unallocated dividend											(631)	(455)	(403)
Non-deductible compensation											0	146	194
Stock based compensation											(1,122)	(1,430)	(2,118)
Impact of tax reform											10,165	0	0
Other items, net											(144)	244	433
Total income tax expense	5,214	$ 4,747	14,048	$ 7,107	1,348		$ 14,377	$ 4,978	$ 5,679		$ 31,116	$ 26,382	$ 28,534
Reduction recognized for applying blended tax rate in prior quarter			1,300
Tax expenses relating to the remeasurement of deferred tax balances			$ 10,200
Effective income tax rates											42.04%	34.93%	35.30%
Deferred tax assets [Abstract]
Allowance for loan and real estate owned losses	8,589				12,101					$ 8,589	$ 8,589	$ 12,101
Postretirement benefits	10,242				13,973					10,242	10,242	13,973
Accrued/deferred compensation	7,554				9,598					7,554	7,554	9,598
ESOP shares allocated or committed to be released	875				1,211					875	875	1,211
Stock compensation	1,914				3,772					1,914	1,914	3,772
Other than temporary loss on securities	64				96					64	64	96
Net operating loss carry forward	1,704				373					1,704	1,704	373
Other	494				271					494	494	271
Total deferred tax asset	31,436				41,395					31,436	31,436	41,395
Deferred tax liabilities [Abstract]
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale	0				301					0	0	301
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap	5,158				2,776					5,158	5,158	2,776
Other	414				625					414	414	625
Total deferred tax liabilities	5,572				3,702					5,572	5,572	3,702
Net deferred tax asset	25,864				37,693					25,864	25,864	37,693
Operating Loss Carryforwards [Line Items]
Income allocated to bad debts for tax purpose recognized in retained earnings	15,100									15,100	15,100
Unrecognized tax liability	4,503									4,503	4,503
Uncertain tax positions	0				$ 0					0	0	$ 0
State [Member]
Operating Loss Carryforwards [Line Items]
Operating Loss Carryforwards	$ 24,000									$ 24,000	$ 24,000

[1] Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000. These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure. Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure. See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

XML

Borrowings (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Weighted average rate	1.90%	1.60%
Borrowings by stated maturity and by maturity or put date [Abstract]
Total borrowings	$ 596,372	$ 642,059
Additional borrowing capacity	$ 898,900
Weighted Average [Member]
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Estimated maturity	2 years 4 months 24 days	3 years 2 months 12 days
Performing [Member]
Borrowings by stated maturity and by maturity or put date [Abstract]
Outstanding balance of performing mortgage loans pledged as collateral	$ 2,840,000
Mortgage-backed Securities and Investment Securities [Member]
Borrowings by stated maturity and by maturity or put date [Abstract]
Book value of mortgage-backed securities and investment securities pledged as collateral	24,900
Fair value of mortgage-backed securities and investment securities pledged as collateral	24,600	$ 58,800
Stated Maturity [Member]
Borrowings by stated maturity and by maturity or put date [Abstract]
2019	193,735
2020	97,418
2021	99,648
2022	110,650
2023	58,426
2025	36,495
Total borrowings	$ 596,372

XML

Derivatives and Hedging Activities (Details) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018 USD ($) Contract	Jun. 30, 2017 USD ($)
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Number of interest rate swap agreements | Contract	23
Derivative, notional amount	$ 405,000	$ 450,000
Net fair value	$ 16,789	$ 6,437
Average rate paid for the year ended	1.96%	1.26%
Average rate received for the year ended	2.06%	0.72%
Weighted average maturity (in years)	3 years 10 months 24 days	5 years 4 months 24 days
Fair value of held to maturity securities pledged as collateral	$ 0	$ 8,500
Accumulated net after-tax losses related to effective cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive loss	$ 11,600	3,700
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Fixed interest rate paid	0.59%
Variable rate basis received	1 Month LIBOR
Derivative, maturity date	Jul. 02, 2018
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Fixed interest rate paid	1.90%
Variable rate basis received	1 Month LIBOR
Derivative, maturity date	Jun. 26, 2025
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Other Assets [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Asset derivatives, notional amount	$ 405,000	450,000
Cash Flow Hedge Interest Rate Swaps-Gross Unrealized Gain [Member] | Other Assets [Member] | Designated as Hedging Instrument [Member]
Derivative [Line Items]
Asset derivatives, fair value	$ 16,789	$ 6,437

XML

Derivatives and Hedging Activities, Gains (Losses) Related to Cash Flow Hedge Interest Rate Swaps (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense		$ 0	$ (8,112)	$ 0
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income		10,352	15,820	(13,936)
Amount of loss recognized in the consolidated statements of income	$ (7,700)	0	(7,670)	$ 0
Interest Rate Swap [Member] | Cash Flow Hedging [Member]
Derivative Instruments, Gain (Loss) [Line Items]
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense		133	(2,523)
Amount of gain recognized in other comprehensive income		10,485	13,297
Amount of loss recognized in the consolidated statements of income		$ 0	$ (7,670)

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Multiemployer Plan (Details) - Multiemployer Plans, Pension [Member] - Pentegra DB Plan [Member] - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Dec. 31, 2008
Multiemployer Plans [Line Items]
Employer identification number	135645888
Plan number	333
Minimum age for eligibility	21 years
Minimum service period for eligibility	1 year
Participants vesting percentage				100.00%
Periods of participants service completion	5 years
Funded status		116.40%	108.10%
Company contribution	$ 500	$ 500	$ 500
Maximum [Member]
Multiemployer Plans [Line Items]
Percentage of company's contributions of total contributions	5.00%

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Savings Incentive Plans (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Savings Incentive Plan [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of employees' gross pay for employer matching contributions	6.00%
Pension Plan [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Savings Incentive Plan [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of employer matching contribution	50.00%
Percentage of employees' gross pay for employer matching contributions	6.00%
Employer contributions	$ 223	$ 219	$ 193
Pension Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Savings Incentive Plan [Member]
Defined Contribution Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Percentage of employer matching contribution	50.00%
Percentage of employees' gross pay for employer matching contributions	6.00%
Interest percentage used in calculating employer matching contribution	9.00%	9.00%	9.00%
Interest expense	$ 1,098	$ 974	$ 820
Employer contributions	115	135	$ 190
Total obligation	$ 13,121	$ 11,795

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Medical Plan and Deferred Fee Plan (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Postretirement Health Coverage [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Medical Plan [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Maximum benefit as percentage of premium	200.00%
Deferred Fee Plan [Member] | Directors [Member]
Deferred Compensation Arrangement with Individual, Excluding Share-based Payments and Postretirement Benefits [Line Items]
Interest percentage used in calculating employer matching contribution	9.00%	9.00%	9.00%
Interest expenses	$ 884	$ 791	$ 694
Total obligation	$ 10,389	$ 9,361

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, BEP Plan, Retirement Plan and Medical Plan (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Pension Plan [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Retirement Plan [Member]
Change in benefit obligation [Abstract]
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of the year	$ 5,858	$ 5,756
Service cost	130	151	$ 174
Interest cost	208	182	227
Actuarial (gain) loss	(518)	(168)
Benefits paid	(90)	(63)
Discount rate change	0	0
Projected benefit obligation at end of the year	5,588	5,858	5,756
Reconciliation of plan assets [Abstract]
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year	0	0
Actual return on plan assets	0	0
Employer contributions	90	63
Benefits paid	(90)	(63)
Fair value of plan assets at end of the year	0	0	0
Unfunded status at end of year	5,588	5,858
Pension Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | BEP Plan [Member]
Change in benefit obligation [Abstract]
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of the year	1,386	1,388
Service cost	0	0	0
Interest cost	45	39	48
Actuarial (gain) loss	(25)	(41)
Benefits paid	0	0
Discount rate change	0	0
Projected benefit obligation at end of the year	1,406	1,386	1,388
Reconciliation of plan assets [Abstract]
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year	0	0
Actual return on plan assets	0	0
Employer contributions	0	0
Benefits paid	0	0
Fair value of plan assets at end of the year	0	0	0
Unfunded status at end of year	1,406	1,386
Postretirement Health Coverage [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Medical Plan [Member]
Change in benefit obligation [Abstract]
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of the year	5,567	6,583
Service cost	59	57	77
Interest cost	211	234	235
Actuarial (gain) loss	41	(1,273)
Benefits paid	(76)	(34)
Discount rate change	0	0
Projected benefit obligation at end of the year	5,802	5,567	6,583
Reconciliation of plan assets [Abstract]
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the year	0	0
Actual return on plan assets	0	0
Employer contributions	76	34
Benefits paid	(76)	(34)
Fair value of plan assets at end of the year	0	0	$ 0
Unfunded status at end of year	$ 5,802	$ 5,567

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Pension Plan [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Retirement Plan [Member]
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income related to pension and other postretirement benefits, on a pre-tax basis [Abstract]
Net actuarial loss	$ (308)	$ 210
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income	(308)	210
Pension Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | BEP Plan [Member]
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income related to pension and other postretirement benefits, on a pre-tax basis [Abstract]
Net actuarial loss	238	299
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income	238	299
Postretirement Health Coverage [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Medical Plan [Member]
Components of accumulated other comprehensive income related to pension and other postretirement benefits, on a pre-tax basis [Abstract]
Net actuarial loss	461	420
Total amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income	$ 461	$ 420

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Net Periodic Benefit Costs (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Pension Plan [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Retirement Plan [Member]
Net Periodic benefit costs [Abstract]
Service cost	$ 130	$ 151	$ 174
Interest cost	208	182	227
Amortization of unrecognized [Abstract]
Net loss	0	0	29
Total	338	333	430
Amounts expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in next fiscal year [Abstract]
Net loss	0
Total amortized net periodic benefit cost	0
Pension Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | BEP Plan [Member]
Net Periodic benefit costs [Abstract]
Service cost	0	0	0
Interest cost	45	39	48
Amortization of unrecognized [Abstract]
Net loss	35	52	40
Total	80	91	88
Amounts expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in next fiscal year [Abstract]
Net loss	33
Total amortized net periodic benefit cost	33
Postretirement Health Coverage [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Medical Plan [Member]
Net Periodic benefit costs [Abstract]
Service cost	59	57	77
Interest cost	211	234	235
Amortization of unrecognized [Abstract]
Net loss	0	350	155
Total	270	$ 641	$ 467
Amounts expected to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in next fiscal year [Abstract]
Net loss	0
Total amortized net periodic benefit cost	$ 0

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Weighted Average Actuarial Assumptions (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Pension Plan [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Retirement Plan [Member]
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used in plan determinations [Abstract]
Discount Rate	4.01%	3.65%	3.23%
Rate of compensation increase	2.25%	2.25%	2.00%
Medical benefits cost rate of increase	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Pension Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | BEP Plan [Member]
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used in plan determinations [Abstract]
Discount Rate	3.84%	3.34%	2.94%
Rate of compensation increase	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Medical benefits cost rate of increase	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Postretirement Health Coverage [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Medical Plan [Member]
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used in plan determinations [Abstract]
Discount Rate	4.09%	3.82%	3.58%
Rate of compensation increase	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Medical benefits cost rate of increase	5.00%	5.00%	5.00%

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Estimated Future Benefit Payments (Details) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018 USD ($)
Pension Plan [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Retirement Plan [Member]
Estimated future benefit payments [Abstract]
2019	$ 303
2020	302
2021	300
2022	297
2023	294
2024-2028	1,807
Pension Plan [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | BEP Plan [Member]
Estimated future benefit payments [Abstract]
2019	110
2020	110
2021	111
2022	111
2023	111
2024-2028	558
Postretirement Health Coverage [Member] | Qualified Plan [Member] | Medical Plan [Member]
Estimated future benefit payments [Abstract]
2019	173
2020	243
2021	267
2022	267
2023	265
2024-2028	$ 1,424

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates (Details) - Postretirement Health Coverage [Member] - Qualified Plan [Member] - Medical Plan [Member] $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018 USD ($)
Effect of change in the assumed health care cost trend rate [Abstract]
Effect of 1% increase on total service cost and interest cost	$ 318
Effect of 1% decrease on total service cost and interest cost	(231)
Effect of 1% increase on post retirement benefits obligation	987
Effect of 1% decrease on post retirement benefits obligation	$ (785)

XML

Employee Benefit Plans, SERP, BOLI, and Split-Dollar Plans (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Bank Owned Life Insurance (at cash surrender value)	$ 98,438	$ 95,946
Bank Owned Life Insurance income	$ 2,492	2,618	$ 2,718
SERP [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Retirement benefit minimum payment period	20 years
Percentage of SERP benefit	70.00%
Benefit expenses	$ 591	1,219	1,492
Accrued liability	11,360	10,769
Postretirement Life Insurance [Member] | Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Bank Owned Life Insurance (at cash surrender value)	98,438	95,946
Bank Owned Life Insurance income	2,492	2,618	2,718
Postretirement Life Insurance [Member] | Nonqualified Plan [Member] | Split Dollar Plan [Member]
Defined Benefit Plan Disclosure [Line Items]
Benefit expenses	105	104	$ 72
Accrued liability	$ 882	$ 777

XML

Stock Based Compensation, Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2006
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the ESOP) [Member]
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Disclosures [Line Items]
Common stock purchased by ESOP (in shares)					2,384,466
Initial public offering price (in dollars per share)					$ 6.67
Additional shares purchased by ESOP (in shares)				1,654,529
Average price of additional shares purchased with second step transaction (in dollars per share)				$ 10.36
Outstanding loan balance	$ 19,703	$ 21,449
Shares allocated to participants since inception (in shares)	1,957,114
Shares committed to be released (in shares)	168,152
ESOP shares unallocated or not yet committed to be released (in shares)	1,913,728
Fair value of shares unallocated or not yet committed to be released	$ 31,002
ESOP compensation expense	3,503	4,139	$ 4,417
ESOP Restoration Plan [Member]
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Disclosures [Line Items]
ESOP compensation expense	665	547	$ 630
Total obligation under the restoration plan	$ 8,380	$ 8,236

XML

Stock Based Compensation, Equity Incentive Plan (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		12 Months Ended
	Aug. 18, 2011	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jul. 26, 2011	Apr. 22, 2008
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Excess tax benefits recognized		$ 1,122	$ 1,430	$ 2,118
Stock Options [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Excess tax benefits recognized		$ 1,122	$ 1,430
Vesting period		5 years
Expiration period of vested options after issuance		10 years
Expiration period of vested options after termination of services		90 days
Assumptions used in estimating fair value of options issued [Abstract]
Option shares granted (in shares)		70,000	20,000	20,000
Expected dividend yield		7.18%	5.35%	6.75%
Expected volatility		18.74%	20.81%	26.10%
Risk-free interest rate		2.75%	1.39%	2.03%
Expected option life		6 years 6 months	6 years 6 months	6 years 6 months
Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period		5 years
2007 Equity Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares authorized (in shares)						4,172,817
2011 Equity Plan [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares authorized (in shares)					5,790,849
2011 Equity Plan [Member] | Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares authorized (in shares)					1,654,528
Officers and Employees [Member] | Stock Options [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted (in shares)	3,033,750
Officers and Employees [Member] | Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted (in shares)	1,227,100
Outside Directors [Member] | Stock Options [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted (in shares)	932,500
Outside Directors [Member] | Restricted Stock [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted (in shares)	373,000

XML

Stock Based Compensation, Stock Option (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life [Abstract]
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation	$ 1,122	$ 1,430	$ 2,118
Stock Options [Member]
Number of Stock Options [Roll Forward]
Outstanding, beginning of period (in shares)	3,729,033
Granted (in shares)	70,000	20,000	20,000
Exercised (in shares)	(1,123,738)
Forfeited (in shares)	(12,000)
Expired (in shares)	(63,432)
Outstanding, end of period (in shares)	2,599,863	3,729,033
Exercisable, end of period (in shares)	2,501,464
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value [Abstract]
Outstanding, beginning of period (in dollars per share)	$ 2.59
Granted (in dollars per share)	0.89
Exercised (in dollars per share)	2.39
Forfeited (in dollars per share)	1.64
Expired (in dollars per share)	2.27
Outstanding, end of period (in dollars per share)	2.64	$ 2.59
Exercisable, end of period (in dollars per share)	2.70
Weighted Average Exercise Price [Abstract]
Outstanding, beginning of period (in dollars per share)	11.70
Granted (in dollars per share)	15.40
Exercised (in dollars per share)	10.79
Forfeited (in dollars per share)	15.89
Expired (in dollars per share)	11.36
Outstanding, end of period (in dollars per share)	12.16	$ 11.70
Exercisable, end of period (in dollars per share)	$ 12.05
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life [Abstract]
Outstanding	3 years 4 months 24 days	3 years 4 months 24 days
Granted	10 years
Exercised	1 year 1 month 6 days
Forfeited	7 years 9 months 18 days
Expired	1 year 7 months 6 days
Exercisable, end of period	3 years 2 months 12 days
Share based compensation expense	$ 41	$ 319	$ 2,099
Expected future expense related to the non-vested options outstanding	$ 91
Weighted average period for recognition	4 years
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation	$ 1,122	$ 1,430

XML

Stock Based Compensation, Restricted Stock (Details) - Restricted Stock [Member] - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period	5 years
Share based compensation expense	$ 137	$ 685	$ 3,872
Expected future expense related to the non-vested restricted stock shares	$ 203
Weighted average period for recognition	2 years 1 month 6 days
Number of Shares Awarded [Roll Forward]
Non-vested, beginning of period (in shares)	35,934
Granted (in shares)	0
Vested (in shares)	(15,734)
Forfeited (in shares)	(6,000)
Non-vested, end of period (in shares)	14,200	35,934
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value [Abstract]
Non-vested, beginning of period (in dollars per share)	$ 15.60
Granted (in dollars per share)	0
Vested (in dollars per share)	15.33
Forfeited (in dollars per share)	15.89
Non-vested, end of period (in dollars per share)	$ 15.78	$ 15.60

XML

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]
Total rent expense	$ 929	$ 918	$ 836
Aggregate minimum lease payments [Abstract]
2019	769
2020	652
2021	521
2022	237
2023	158
Thereafter	34
Total	2,371
Outstanding commitments to purchase securities	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Regulatory Capital Requirements (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Compliance with Regulatory Capital Requirements under Banking Regulations [Line Items]
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), actual amount	$ 548,122	$ 555,703
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), actual rate	14.82%	15.02%
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), required amount	$ 166,458	$ 166,443
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), required rate	4.50%	4.50%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual amount	$ 548,122	$ 555,703
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual rate	14.82%	15.02%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), required amount	$ 221,945	$ 221,924
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), required rate	6.00%	6.00%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual amount	$ 578,685	$ 585,975
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual rate	15.64%	15.84%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), required amount	$ 295,926	$ 295,898
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), required rate	8.00%	8.00%
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), actual amount	$ 548,122	$ 555,703
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), actual rate	13.25%	13.51%
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), required amount	$ 165,465	$ 164,562
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), required rate	4.00%	4.00%
Capital conservation buffer, actual amount	$ 282,759	$ 290,077
Capital conservation buffer, actual rate	7.64%	7.84%
Capital conservation buffer, required amount	$ 69,358	$ 46,234
Capital conservation buffer, required rate	1.875%	1.25%
Bank [Member]
Compliance with Regulatory Capital Requirements under Banking Regulations [Line Items]
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), actual amount	$ 470,857	$ 521,414
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), actual rate	12.73%	14.10%
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), required amount	$ 166,431	$ 166,440
Common equity tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), required rate	4.50%	4.50%
Common equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), well capitalized amount	$ 240,401	$ 240,413
Common equity Tier 1 (to risk-weighted assets), well capitalized rate	6.50%	6.50%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual amount	$ 470,857	$ 521,414
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual rate	12.73%	14.10%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), required amount	$ 221,908	$ 221,919
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), required rate	6.00%	6.00%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), well capitalized amount	$ 295,878	$ 295,893
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets), well capitalized rate	8.00%	8.00%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual amount	$ 501,419	$ 551,686
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), actual rate	13.56%	14.92%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), required amount	$ 295,878	$ 295,893
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), required rate	8.00%	8.00%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), well capitalized amount	$ 369,847	$ 369,866
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets), well capitalized rate	10.00%	10.00%
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), actual amount	$ 470,857	$ 521,414
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), actual rate	11.38%	12.68%
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), required amount	$ 165,438	$ 164,533
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), required rate	4.00%	4.00%
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), well capitalized amount	$ 206,797	$ 205,666
Tier 1 Leverage capital (to average assets), well capitalized rate	5.00%	5.00%
Capital conservation buffer, actual amount	$ 205,541	$ 255,793
Capital conservation buffer, actual rate	5.56%	6.92%
Capital conservation buffer, required amount	$ 69,346	$ 46,233
Capital conservation buffer, required rate	1.875%	1.25%

XML

Fair Value Measurements (Details) - Market Approach Valuation Technique [Member] - Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018
Impaired Loans [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Fair value inputs [Abstract]
Adjustment rate	0.00%
Risk premium rate	0.00%
Discount rate	0.00%
Impaired Loans [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Fair value inputs [Abstract]
Adjustment rate	20.00%
Risk premium rate	10.00%
Discount rate	8.00%
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Fair value inputs [Abstract]
Discount rate	5.00%
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Fair value inputs [Abstract]
Discount rate	20.00%

XML

Fair Value Measurements, Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	$ 44,691	$ 97,930
Equity Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	1,565	1,498
Residential MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	71	6,921
Commercial MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	4,137	4,406
CMO [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	38,918	85,105
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Interest rate swap	16,789	6,437
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	61,480	104,367
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Available-for-sale Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	44,691	97,930
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Equity Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	1,565	1,498
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Residential MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	71	6,921
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Commercial MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	4,137	4,406
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | CMO [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	38,918	85,105
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Interest rate swap	0	0
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	1,565	1,498
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Available-for-sale Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	1,565	1,498
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Equity Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	1,565	1,498
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Residential MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | Commercial MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member] | CMO [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Interest rate swap	16,789	6,437
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	59,915	102,869
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Available-for-sale Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	43,126	96,432
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Equity Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Residential MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	71	6,921
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member] | Commercial MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	4,137	4,406
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member] | CMO [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	38,918	85,105
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Interest rate swap	0	0
Total assets measured on a recurring basis	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Available-for-sale Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Equity Securities [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Residential MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | Commercial MBS [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	0	0
Fair Value, Measurements, Recurring [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member] | CMO [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Securities available for sale	$ 0	$ 0

XML

Fair Value Measurements, Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis (Details) - Fair Value, Measurements, Nonrecurring [Member] - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	$ 2,620	$ 3,106
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	2,620	3,106
Impaired Loans [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	1,056	2,966
Impaired Loans [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Impaired Loans [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Impaired Loans [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	1,056	2,966
Impaired Loans [Member] | Residential [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis		59
Impaired Loans [Member] | Residential [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis		0
Impaired Loans [Member] | Residential [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis		0
Impaired Loans [Member] | Residential [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis		59
Impaired Loans [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	1,056	2,907
Impaired Loans [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Impaired Loans [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Impaired Loans [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	1,056	2,907
Real Estate Owned [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	1,564	140
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	1,564	140
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	1,564	140
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	0	0
Real Estate Owned [Member] | Other Commercial Real Estate [Member] | Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]
Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis	$ 1,564	$ 140

XML

Fair Value Measurements, Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017
Financial assets [Abstract]
Securities held to maturity		$ 326,511	$ 237,204
Carrying Amount [Member]
Financial assets [Abstract]
Securities held to maturity		335,374	239,631
Loans, net	[1]	3,540,903	3,566,703
Financial liabilities [Abstract]
Time deposits		1,211,531	1,124,140
Term borrowings		497,372	489,859
Fair Value [Member]
Financial assets [Abstract]
Securities held to maturity		326,511	237,204
Loans, net	[1]	3,470,434	3,532,998
Financial liabilities [Abstract]
Time deposits		1,219,558	1,134,628
Term borrowings		486,278	487,305
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) [Member]
Financial assets [Abstract]
Securities held to maturity		0	0
Loans, net	[1]	0	0
Financial liabilities [Abstract]
Time deposits		0	0
Term borrowings		0	0
Significant Other Observable inputs (Level 2) [Member]
Financial assets [Abstract]
Securities held to maturity		326,511	237,204
Loans, net	[1]	0	0
Financial liabilities [Abstract]
Time deposits		1,219,558	1,134,628
Term borrowings		486,278	487,305
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) [Member]
Financial assets [Abstract]
Securities held to maturity		0	0
Loans, net	[1]	3,470,434	3,532,998
Financial liabilities [Abstract]
Time deposits		0	0
Term borrowings		$ 0	$ 0

[1] Comprised of loans (including impaired loans), net of deferred loan fees and the allowance for loan losses.

XML

Parent Company Only Financial Statements, Balance Sheets (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2015
Assets [Abstract]
Mortgage Loans, net	$ 3,540,903	$ 3,566,703
Securities available for sale, at fair value	44,691	97,930
Accrued interest receivable	11,261	10,620
Other assets	30,276	9,030
Total Assets	4,167,039	4,137,684
Liabilities and Equity [Abstract]
Borrowings	596,372	642,059
Other liabilities	72,024	56,428
Total Liabilities	3,607,693	3,578,461
Total Equity	559,346	559,223	$ 535,200	$ 517,670
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	4,167,039	4,137,684
Parent Company [Member]
Assets [Abstract]
Cash	34	51
Fed Funds Sold	56,552	24,440
ESOP loan	19,703	21,449
Securities available for sale, at fair value	1,565	1,498
Accrued interest receivable	440	399
Investment in Subsidiaries	481,412	524,413
Other assets	0	37
Total Assets	559,706	572,287
Liabilities and Equity [Abstract]
Borrowings	0	12,500
Other liabilities	360	564
Total Liabilities	360	13,064
Total Equity	559,346	559,223
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$ 559,706	$ 572,287

XML

Parent Company Only Financial Statements, Statements of Income (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended									12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]
Interest on mortgage loans										$ 144,051	$ 133,967	$ 125,427
Gain on sale of securities					$ (826)					(324)	(826)	990
Other income										303	333	625
Total interest income	$ 39,293	$ 37,561	$ 38,052	$ 37,920	36,565		$ 36,586	$ 35,251	$ 34,060	152,826	142,462	134,324
Interest on borrowings										11,276	13,180	16,139
Other expenses										5,977	4,772	4,999
Income before income tax expense	18,717	18,172	18,018	19,103	4,239	[1]	38,643	16,354	16,290	74,010	75,526	80,829
Income tax expense (benefit)	5,214	4,747	14,048	7,107	1,348		14,377	4,978	5,679	31,116	26,382	28,534
Net income	$ 13,503	$ 13,425	$ 3,970	$ 11,996	$ 2,891		$ 24,266	$ 11,376	$ 10,611	42,894	49,144	52,295
Parent Company [Member]
Condensed Financial Statements, Captions [Line Items]
Interest on mortgage loans										0	0	1,205
Interest on ESOP loan										845	815	838
Interest income on fed funds										377	295	176
Dividends/distributions from subsidiaries										96,153	0	44,392
Gain on sale of securities										0	0	406
Other income										43	35	35
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary										(53,243)	49,286	13,563
Total interest income										44,175	50,431	60,615
Interest on borrowings										67	404	405
Other expenses										1,375	1,016	979
Income before income tax expense										42,733	49,011	59,231
Income tax expense (benefit)										(161)	(133)	6,936
Net income										$ 42,894	$ 49,144	$ 52,295

[1] Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000. These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure. Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure. See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

XML

Parent Company Only Financial Statements, Statements of Cash Flows (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Cash flows from operating activities [Abstract]
Net income	$ 13,503	$ 13,425	$ 3,970	$ 11,996	$ 2,891	$ 24,266	$ 11,376	$ 10,611	$ 42,894	$ 49,144	$ 52,295
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities [Abstract]
Loss (gain) on sale of securities					826				324	826	(990)
Increase in accrued interest receivable									(641)	(677)	(677)
(Increase) decrease in other assets									(11,814)	20,194	(9,708)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities									15,651	(22,195)	16,008
Net cash provided by operating activities									56,779	37,219	28,006
Cash flows from investing activities [Abstract]
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale									29,505	55,093	100,468
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable									96,155	(366,559)	(273,846)
Net cash used in investing activities									(16,008)	(433,773)	(271,563)
Cash flows from financing activities [Abstract]
Dividends paid to shareholders									(57,353)	(51,850)	(50,007)
Purchase of treasury stock									(7,834)	(1,574)	(1,593)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities									(39,501)	413,561	244,999
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents									1,270	17,007	1,442
Parent Company [Member]
Cash flows from operating activities [Abstract]
Net income									42,894	49,144	52,295
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities [Abstract]
Loss (gain) on sale of securities									0	0	(406)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary									53,243	(49,286)	(13,563)
Increase in accrued interest receivable									(41)	12	118
(Increase) decrease in other assets									117	16	12
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities									(308)	121	(155)
Net cash provided by operating activities									95,905	7	38,301
Cash flows from investing activities [Abstract]
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale									0	0	1,013
Principal collected on ESOP loan									1,746	2,129	2,469
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable									0	0	31,616
Net cash used in investing activities									1,746	2,129	35,098
Cash flows from financing activities [Abstract]
Dividends paid to shareholders									(57,353)	(51,850)	(50,007)
Purchase of treasury stock									(7,834)	(1,574)	(1,593)
Stock issued upon exercise of stock options									12,131	9,567	14,705
Repayment of long term debt									(12,500)	0	0
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities									(65,556)	(43,857)	(36,895)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents									32,095	(41,721)	36,504
Cash at beginning of period				$ 24,491				$ 66,212	24,491	66,212	29,708
Cash at end of period	$ 56,586				$ 24,491				$ 56,586	$ 24,491	$ 66,212

XML

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended									12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Selected Operating Data [Abstract]
Interest income	$ 39,293	$ 37,561	$ 38,052	$ 37,920	$ 36,565		$ 36,586	$ 35,251	$ 34,060	$ 152,826	$ 142,462	$ 134,324
Interest expense	11,572	10,608	10,444	10,276	10,278		9,791	9,022	8,760	42,900	37,851	34,023
Net interest income before provision for loan losses	27,721	26,953	27,608	27,644	26,287		26,795	26,229	25,300	109,926	104,611	100,301
Provision for losses on loans	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	0	0
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	27,721	26,953	27,608	27,644	26,287		26,795	26,229	25,300	109,926	104,611	100,301
Other income	1,015	979	623	971	(7,338)		21,741	1,183	1,258	3,588	16,961	44,331
Other expense	10,019	9,760	10,213	9,512	14,710	[1]	9,893	11,058	10,268	39,504	46,046	63,803
Income before income tax expense	18,717	18,172	18,018	19,103	4,239	[1]	38,643	16,354	16,290	74,010	75,526	80,829
Income tax expense (note 11)	5,214	4,747	14,048	7,107	1,348		14,377	4,978	5,679	31,116	26,382	28,534
Net income	$ 13,503	$ 13,425	$ 3,970	$ 11,996	$ 2,891		$ 24,266	$ 11,376	$ 10,611	$ 42,894	$ 49,144	$ 52,295
Basic earnings per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.30	$ 0.30	$ 0.09	$ 0.27	$ 0.07		$ 0.56	$ 0.26	$ 0.25	$ 0.97	$ 1.14	$ 1.25
Diluted earnings per common share (in dollars per share)	$ 0.30	$ 0.30	$ 0.09	$ 0.27	$ 0.06		$ 0.54	$ 0.26	$ 0.24	$ 0.95	$ 1.10	$ 1.21
Net loss on termination of derivatives					$ (7,700)					$ 0	$ (7,670)	$ 0
Loss on sale of securities					(826)					(324)	(826)	990
FHLBNY prepayment penalties					$ 5,200					$ 0	$ 5,169	$ 17,988

[1] Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000. These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure. Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure. See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

XML

Earnings Per Share (Details) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended								12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017	Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Summary of the Company's earnings per share calculations and reconciliation of basic to diluted earnings per share [Abstract]
Net income	$ 13,503	$ 13,425	$ 3,970	$ 11,996	$ 2,891	$ 24,266	$ 11,376	$ 10,611	$ 42,894	$ 49,144	$ 52,295
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic (in shares)									44,226	43,263	41,864
Effect of dilutive non-vested shares and stock options outstanding (in shares)									848	1,246	1,411
Weighted average common shares outstanding-diluted (in shares)									45,074	44,509	43,275
Earnings per share-basic (in dollars per share)	$ 0.30	$ 0.30	$ 0.09	$ 0.27	$ 0.07	$ 0.56	$ 0.26	$ 0.25	$ 0.97	$ 1.14	$ 1.25
Earnings per share-diluted (in dollars per share)	$ 0.30	$ 0.30	$ 0.09	$ 0.27	$ 0.06	$ 0.54	$ 0.26	$ 0.24	$ 0.95	$ 1.10	$ 1.21

XML

Other Comprehensive Income, Components of Comprehensive Income both Gross and Net of Tax (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended									12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Gross [Abstract]
Net income	$ 18,717	$ 18,172	$ 18,018	$ 19,103	$ 4,239	[1]	$ 38,643	$ 16,354	$ 16,290	$ 74,010	$ 75,526	$ 80,829
Other comprehensive income (loss) [Abstract]
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale										(1,182)	(2,795)	1,011
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income										324	883	(990)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps										10,352	15,820	(13,936)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income										0	8,112	0
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations										35	402	224
Change in funded status of retirement obligations										503	1,482	(797)
Total other comprehensive income										10,032	23,904	(14,488)
Total comprehensive income										84,042	99,430	66,341
Tax applicable to [Abstract]
Net income	5,214	4,747	14,048	7,107	1,348		14,377	4,978	5,679	31,116	26,382	28,534
Other comprehensive (loss) income [Abstract]
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale										(437)	(1,202)	416
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income										140	381	(428)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps										3,556	6,839	(6,020)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income										0	3,498	0
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations										14	156	95
Change in funded status of retirement obligations										156	640	(327)
Total other comprehensive income										3,429	10,312	(6,264)
Total comprehensive income										34,545	36,694	22,270
Net of tax [Abstract]
Net income	$ 13,503	$ 13,425	$ 3,970	$ 11,996	$ 2,891		$ 24,266	$ 11,376	$ 10,611	42,894	49,144	52,295
Other comprehensive (loss) income [Abstract]
Change in unrealized holding (loss) gain on securities available for sale										(745)	(1,593)	595
Reclassification adjustment for security losses (gains) included in net income										184	502	(562)
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps										6,796	8,981	(7,916)
Reclassification adjustment for derivative losses included in net income										0	4,614	0
Amortization related to post-retirement obligations										21	246	129
Change in funded status of retirement obligations										347	842	(470)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)										6,603	13,592	(8,224)
Total comprehensive income										$ 49,497	$ 62,736	$ 44,071

[1] Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000. These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure. Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure. See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

XML

Other Comprehensive Income, Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Changes in components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax [Roll Forward]
Balance	$ 559,223	$ 535,200	$ 517,670
Net change	6,603	13,592	(8,224)
Balance	559,346	559,223	535,200
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax [Member]
Changes in components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax [Roll Forward]
Balance	3,520	(10,072)	(1,848)
Net change	6,603	13,592
Reclassification due to adoption of ASU No. 2018-02	1,100
Balance	11,223	3,520	(10,072)
Unrealized Holding Gains on Securities Available for Sale [Member]
Changes in components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax [Roll Forward]
Balance	438	1,529
Net change	(561)	(1,091)
Reclassification due to adoption of ASU No. 2018-02	37
Balance	(86)	438	1,529
Post Retirement Obligations [Member]
Changes in components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax [Roll Forward]
Balance	(569)	(1,657)
Net change	368	1,088
Reclassification due to adoption of ASU No. 2018-02	(113)
Balance	(314)	(569)	(1,657)
Unrealized Holding Gains on Interest Rate Swap [Member]
Changes in components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax [Roll Forward]
Balance	3,651	(9,944)
Net change	6,796	13,595
Reclassification due to adoption of ASU No. 2018-02	1,176
Balance	$ 11,623	$ 3,651	$ (9,944)

XML

Other Comprehensive Income, Reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands		3 Months Ended									12 Months Ended
		Jun. 30, 2018	Mar. 31, 2018	Dec. 31, 2017	Sep. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2017		Mar. 31, 2017	Dec. 31, 2016	Sep. 30, 2016	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Net (loss) gain on sale of securities						$ (826)					$ (324)	$ (826)	$ 990
Net loss on termination of derivatives						(7,700)					0	(7,670)	0
Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits											26,532	28,862	33,774
Total before tax		$ 18,717	$ 18,172	$ 18,018	$ 19,103	4,239	[1]	$ 38,643	$ 16,354	$ 16,290	74,010	75,526	80,829
Income tax expense (benefit)		5,214	4,747	14,048	7,107	1,348		14,377	4,978	5,679	31,116	26,382	28,534
Net income		$ 13,503	$ 13,425	$ 3,970	$ 11,996	$ 2,891		$ 24,266	$ 11,376	$ 10,611	42,894	49,144	52,295
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Total before tax											359	9,397	(766)
Income tax expense (benefit)											154	4,035	(333)
Net income											205	5,362	(433)
Reclassification Adjustment for Security Losses Included in Net Income [Member] | Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Net (loss) gain on sale of securities											324	883	(990)
Reclassification Adjustment for Derivative Losses Included in Net Income [Member] | Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Net loss on termination of derivatives											0	8,112	0
Amortization Related to Post-retirement Obligations [Member] | Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits	[2]										35	402	224
Net Loss [Member] | Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]
Reclassification out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Line Items]
Compensation, payroll taxes and fringe benefits	[2]										$ 35	$ 402	$ 224

[1] Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a net loss on termination of derivatives of $7.7 million and a loss on the sale of securities of $826,000. These losses were incurred in conjunction with the balance sheet restructure. Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 included $5.2 million in FHLB prepayment penalties incurred in conjuction with the balance sheet restructure. See Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Comparison of Operating Results, for the Periods Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016-"2017 Balance Sheet restructure" for additional information.

[2] These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computations of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 14, Postretirement Benefits.

XML

Real Estate Joint Ventures, net and Real Estate Held for Investment (Details) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018	Jun. 30, 2017	Jun. 30, 2016
Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net and Real Estate Held for Investment [Abstract]
Proceeds from real estate and real estate joint ventures	$ 0	$ 25,318	$ 38,614
Real Estate Held for Investment Properties in Joint Venture Partnership [Member]
Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net and Real Estate Held for Investment [Abstract]
Proceeds from real estate and real estate joint ventures		25,318	20,868
Gain on sale of investment		$ 20,856	19,735
Real Estate Held for Investment Property [Member]
Real Estate Joint Ventures, Net and Real Estate Held for Investment [Abstract]
Proceeds from real estate and real estate joint ventures			17,746
Gain on sale of investment			$ 17,809

XML

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Details) $ in Thousands	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2018 USD ($)
New Accounting Pronouncement, Early Adoption, Effect [Member]
New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings due to income tax effects of Tax Cuts and Jobs Act	$ 1,100
Accounting Standards Update 2016-01 [Member]
New Accounting Pronouncements or Change in Accounting Principle [Line Items]
Cumulative effect adjustment for equity instruments to the balance sheet	$ 658