2.4.0.8115 - Disclosure - Commitments and Contingenciestruefalsefalse1falsefalsefalseP01_01_2013To06_30_2013http://www.sec.gov/CIK0001476638duration2013-01-01T00:00:002013-06-30T00:00:001true1us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureAbstractus-gaap_truenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalse1falsefalsefalse00falsefalsefalsexbrli:stringItemTypestringfalse02false2us-gaap_CommitmentsAndContingenciesDisclosureTextBlockus-gaap_truenadurationfalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalsefalseterseLabel1falsefalsefalse00 <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif "> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> <b>Note 8 - Commitments and Contingencies</b></div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;TEXT-INDENT: 0.5in; MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> <font style="FONT-WEIGHT: normal"><u>Litigation</u></font></div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On <font style=" ">October 26, 2012</font>, the Company was named as defendant in a complaint filed in the County of Westchester, Supreme Court of the State of New York by Porter, Levay & Rose, Inc., index number 68540/2012. The complaint alleges the Plaintiff rendered work, labor and services to the Company on, about, or between October 18, 2012, and is seeking $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">103,198</font>, together with interest running from October 18, 2012. On April 30, 2013, Porter, Levay & Rose, Inc. was awarded a summary judgment. On May 6, 2013, a judgment was entered in favor of Porter, Levay & Rose, Inc. in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Westchester for an amount which was accrued for at June 30, 2013.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On January 22, 2013, the Company was named as defendant in a complaint filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, case number 34-2013-00138819 by Babich & Associates, Inc., a Texas Corporation. The complaint alleges that the Company was invoiced for services relating to professional staffing services for 2 potential employees that the Company subsequently hired, and is seeking $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">48,000</font> plus earned interest at the rate of <font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">10</font>% per annum from May 3, 2012. On April 25, 2013, the parties signed a settlement for an amount which was accrued for at June 30, 2013. Payment is pending.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On January 25, 2013, the Company and its CEO were named defendants in a complaint filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, case number 34-2013-00138978 by Daniel Lucas, a former employee. The complaint alleges that the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Lucas for the purposes of providing services as the Company’s Regional Sales Manager, that the Company and its CEO breached the agreement by refusing to compensate Mr. Lucas for his services, and as a result, Mr. Lucas is seeking lost compensation and benefits in the amount of $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">77,429</font>, compensatory damages, attorneys’ fees, interest, and any other relief as the court deems just and proper. The Company disputes these claims and has hired counsel to represent it in the matter.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On January 25, 2013, the Company and its CEO were named defendants in a complaint filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento case number 34-2013-00138979 by Timothy Barone, a former employee who was terminated for cause. The complaint alleges that the Company entered into an employment agreement with the Plaintiff for the purposes of providing services as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Global Accounts and Partners, that the Company and its CEO breached the agreement by refusing to compensate Mr. Barone for his services, and as a result, Mr. Barone is seeking lost compensation and benefits in the amount of $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">194,596</font>, additional tax liability of $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">150,000</font>, compensatory damages, exemplary and/or punitive damages in an amount to be determined, attorneys’ fees, interest, and any other relief as the court deems just and proper. The Company disputes these claims and has hired counsel to represent it in the matter.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On <font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">February 20, 2013</font>, the Company was named as a defendant in a complaint filed in the Superior Court, Wake County, State of North Carolina, case number I3CV002442 by Accentuate Staffing Inc. (“Accentuate”). The complaint alleges that the Company was invoiced for services relating to professional staffing services as defined in a certain contract executed on December 20, 2011, and is seeking $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">59,824</font> plus interest and costs as allowed by law. On April 3, 2013, Accentuate obtained Entry of Default and Default Judgment and on April 25, 2013, a Writ of Execution was issued. On July 3, 2013, this case was settled in full for an amount which was accrued for at June 30, 2013.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On <font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">February 25, 2013</font>, the Company, its CEO and its CFO were named defendants in a complaint filed in the Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, civil case number 13-0641 by David E. Fahey, a former employee of the company. The complaint alleges that Mr. Fahey was not paid commissions that were due and owing and the Company failed to reimburse the Plaintiff for his business expenses, resulting in a breach of contract, and is seeking $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">33,695</font> in commissions, $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">4,300</font> in out of pocket expenses, and treble damages, attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. The Company disputes these claims and has hired counsel to represent it in the matter.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On <font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">March 7, 2013</font>, the Company was named as a defendant in a complaint yet to be filed in District Court, First Judicial District, Carver County, State of Minnesota. The complaint alleges that the Company has not paid commissions totaling $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">11,900</font> to Dan Skrove, a former employee who resigned in 2012. In April 2013, the complaint was settled. In May 2013, the Company paid in full.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On <font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">March 11, 2013</font>, the Company was named as a defendant in a complaint filed in the Superior Court, Wake County, State of North Carolina, case number 13CV003506 by TSG and Associates, LLC d/b/a The Select Group Raleigh, LLC. The complaint alleges that the Company was invoiced for services relating to professional staffing services as described by a Direct Hire Agreement dated June 13, 2011, and is seeking $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">41,000</font>, plus attorney’s fees of $6,150. The Company is currently working toward a settlement agreement and has recorded an accrual at June 30, 2013.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> On <font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">June 19, 2013</font>, the Company and its CEO were named defendants in a complaint filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento case number 34-2013-00146750 by David Wagner, a former employee of the Company who resigned from the Company. The complaint alleges that the Company entered into an employment agreement with the Plaintiff for the purposes of providing services as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Sales, that the Company and its CEO breached the agreement by refusing to compensate Mr. Wagner for his services, and as a result, Mr. Wagner is seeking lost compensation and benefits in the amount of $137,965.72, severance pay in the amount of $<font style=" FONT-SIZE: 10pt">45,000</font>, attorneys’ fees, interest, and any other relief as the court deems just and proper. The Company disputes these claims and has hired counsel to represent it in the matter.</div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt">  </div> <div style="clear:both; FONT-FAMILY:Times New Roman;FONT-SIZE: 10pt;MARGIN: 0pt 0px; FONT: 10pt Times New Roman, Times, Serif"> The Company records legal costs associated with loss contingencies as incurred.</div> </div> falsefalsefalsenonnum:textBlockItemTypenaThe entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 210
-SubTopic 10
-Section S99
-Paragraph 1
-Subparagraph (SX 210.5-02.25)
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6877327&loc=d3e13212-122682
Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 825
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 1
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6449706&loc=d3e16207-108621
Reference 3: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 460
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 8
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6398077&loc=d3e12565-110249
Reference 4: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 450
-SubTopic 20
-Section 50
-Paragraph 4
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=25496072&loc=d3e14435-108349
Reference 5: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
-Publisher FASB
-Name Accounting Standards Codification
-Topic 440
-SubTopic 10
-Section 50
-Paragraph 2
-URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6394976&loc=d3e25287-109308
false0falseCommitments and ContingenciesUnKnownUnKnownUnKnownUnKnowntruefalsefalseSheethttp://www.CK0001476638.com/role/CommitmentsAndContingencies12