XML 73 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments and Contingencies
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and Contingencies
Future Minimum Lease Payments
The Company has entered into lease agreements related to certain acquisitions under leasehold interest arrangements. The following table reflects the minimum base rental cash payments due from the Company over the next five years and thereafter under these arrangements. These amounts exclude contingent rent payments, as applicable, that may be payable based on provisions related to increases in annual rent based on exceeding certain economic indexes among other items.
(In thousands)
 
Future Minimum Base Rent Payments
July 1, 2014 - December 31, 2014
 
$
1,693

2015
 
4,555

2016
 
4,991

2017
 
4,991

2018
 
5,175

Thereafter, 2019 - 2050
 
260,549

 
 
$
281,954


Litigation
On October 15, 2013, RXR WWP Owner LLC (“RXR”) filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. and the Company (collectively, the “ARC Parties”) alleging that, under an agreement that RXR entered into with the co-defendant WWP Sponsor LLC dated May 30, 2013 (the “May 30 Agreement”), RXR was entitled to acquire a 48.9% equity interest in the indirect owner of Worldwide Plaza. RXR claimed that the ARC Parties are liable for breach of a confidentiality agreement, tortious interference with the May 30 Agreement and tortious interference with prospective business relations. RXR moved for a preliminary injunction barring the defendants from consummating the Worldwide Plaza transaction. On October 30, 2013, the Court denied RXR’s preliminary injunction motion, and the transaction was thereafter consummated. On November 21, 2013 RXR filed an amended complaint adding the ARC Parties as parties to a permanent injunction claim that was previously asserted solely against the ARC Parties’ co-defendants. The ARC Parties filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on December 11, 2013. The motion was fully briefed on February 28, 2014. The court heard oral arguments on the motion to dismiss on May 8, 2014 and the Company is currently awaiting a ruling from the court. RXR seeks damages against the ARC Parties of no less than $200.0 million. The Company believes that such lawsuit is without merit, but the ultimate outcome of such matter cannot be predicted. While losses and legal expenses may be incurred, an estimate of the range of potential losses cannot be made, and no provisions for such losses have been recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2014. As of June 30, 2014, there were no other material legal proceedings pending or known to be contemplated against the Company.
Environmental Matters
In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, the Company may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. The Company maintains environmental insurance for its properties that provides coverage for potential environmental liabilities, subject to the policy's coverage conditions and limitations. The Company has not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim, and is not aware of any other environmental condition that it believes will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations.