REGULATORY MATTERS

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2020

REGULATORY MATTERS

REGULATORY MATTERS

NOTE 19: REGULATORY MATTERS

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by state and federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.

The Company and the Bank’s Common Equity Tier 1 capital includes common stock and related capital surplus, net of treasury stock, and retained earnings. In connection with the adoption of the Basel III Capital Rules, the Company and the Bank elected to opt-out of the requirement to include most components of accumulated other comprehensive income in Common Equity Tier 1 capital. Common Equity Tier 1 capital for both the Company and the Bank is reduced by goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities.

The Basel III Capital Rules require the Company and the Bank to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0%); (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier 1 capital ratio, effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%); (iii) a minimum ratio of total capital (that is, Tier 1 plus Tier 2) to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio, effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5%); and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to average quarterly assets.

The Basel III Capital Rules also provide for a “countercyclical capital buffer” that is applicable to only certain covered institutions and does not have any current applicability to the Company and the Bank. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and, as detailed above, effectively increases the minimum required risk-weighted capital ratios. Banking institutions with a ratio of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets below the effective minimum (4.5% plus the capital conservation buffer and, if applicable, the countercyclical capital buffer) will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.

In October 2019, the federal bank regulatory agencies, or the Agencies, issued a final rule, the Community Bank Leverage Ratio Framework, or the Framework, to simplify capital calculations for community banks. The Framework provides for a simple measure of capital adequacy for certain community banking organizations and is consistent with Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act. The Framework is optional and is designed to reduce burden by removing requirements for calculating and reporting risk-based capital ratios. Depository institutions and depository institution holding companies that have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets and meet other qualifying criteria, including a leverage ratio of greater than 9%, are considered qualifying community banking organizations and are eligible to opt into the Framework. The final rule became effective January 1, 2020, and organizations that opt into the Framework and meet the criteria established by the rule can use the Framework for regulatory reports for the quarter ending June 30, 2020. In April 2020, the Agencies announced two interim final rules to provide relief associated with Section 4012 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act. For institutions that elect the Framework, the interim rules temporarily lower the leverage ratio requirement to 8% for the second quarter of 2020 through the end of calendar year 2020 and to 8.5% for the 2021 calendar year. An institution will have until January 1, 2022 before the 9% leverage ratio requirement is re-established. The Company determined not to opt into the Framework and will continue to compute regulatory capital ratios based on the Basel III Capital Rules discussed above.

In March 2020, the Agencies issued an interim final rule that allows banking organizations to mitigate the effects of CECL on their regulatory capital computations. This interim rule is in addition to the three-year transition period already in place under the capital transition rule previously issued in February 2019. Banking organizations that are required under U.S. accounting standards to adopt CECL in 2020 can mitigate the estimated cumulative regulatory capital effects for an additional two years. This rule allows an institution to defer the full effect of adopting CECL in January 2020 and transition that impact into its regulatory capital calculation, including ratios, over an extended period. Additionally, the interim rule extends the transition period whereby an institution can defer the impact from CECL on the current period, determined based on the difference between the new CECL ACL and the allowance for loan losses under the incurred loss method from previous GAAP, for up to two years. The total impact related to CECL would then be transitioned into regulatory capital and the associated ratios over a three-year transition period, beginning after the initial two-year deferral period, for a total transition period of five years. The Company determined not to opt into the transition and has reported the full effect of CECL upon adoption and for the current reporting period in its regulatory capital calculation and ratios.

The Company is subject to the regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve and, for the Bank, those administered by the OCC. Regulatory authorities can initiate certain mandatory actions if the Company or the Bank fail to meet the minimum capital requirements, which could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Management believes, as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

On June 18, 2020, the Bank and the OCC entered into a Formal Agreement, or the Agreement, with regard to BSA/AML compliance matters. The Agreement generally requires that the Bank enhance its policies and procedures to comply with BSA/AML laws and regulations. Specifically, the Agreement requires the Bank to take certain actions, including, but not limited to: (i) establishing a Compliance Committee to oversee the Bank’s compliance with the Agreement; (ii) ensuring that the BSA/AML staff has sufficient authority and resources to fulfill its responsibilities; (iii) developing, implementing, and adhering to a written program of policies and procedures to provide for compliance with the BSA, including with respect to model risk management for automated monitoring systems; (iv) establishing policies and procedures for performing customer due diligence/enhanced due diligence and customer risk identification processes; (v) adopting and adhering to an independent BSA/AML audit program; (vi) developing, implementing, and adhering to a comprehensive training program for all appropriate Bank employees to ensure their awareness of their responsibility for compliance with the requirements of the BSA, the Bank’s relevant policies, procedures, and processes, and of relevant examples of red flags for money laundering, terrorist financing, and suspicious activity; and (vii) performing a review of account and transaction activity for certain time periods.

At June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company and the Bank, were “well capitalized” based on the ratios presented below. Actual and required capital ratios for the Company and the Bank were as follows for the dates presented:

			Minimum		Required to be
			Capital Required		Considered Well
	Actual		Basel III		Capitalized
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount	Ratio	Amount	Ratio	Amount	Ratio
June 30, 2020
Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$ 446,215	15.30%	$ 204,094	7.00%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 409,242	14.04%	$ 204,078	7.00%	$ 189,501	6.50%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$ 446,215	15.30%	$ 247,828	8.50%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 409,242	14.04%	$ 247,809	8.50%	$ 233,232	8.00%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$ 482,762	16.56%	$ 360,140	10.50%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 445,787	15.29%	$ 306,117	10.50%	$ 291,540	10.00%
Tier 1 Leverage Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated	$ 446,215	11.96%	$ 149,278	4.00%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 409,242	10.97%	$ 149,256	4.00%	$ 186,570	5.00%
December 31, 2019
Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$ 448,445	15.52%	$ 202,218	7.00%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 406,675	14.08%	$ 202,203	7.00%	$ 187,760	6.50%
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$ 448,445	15.52%	$ 245,550	8.50%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 406,675	14.08%	$ 245,532	8.50%	$ 231,089	8.00%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets:
Consolidated	$ 474,104	16.41%	$ 303,327	10.50%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 432,334	14.97%	$ 303,304	10.50%	$ 288,861	10.00%
Tier 1 Leverage Capital to Average Assets:
Consolidated	$ 448,445	13.11%	$ 136,798	4.00%	N/A	N/A
Bank Only	$ 406,675	11.90%	$ 136,754	4.00%	$ 170,943	5.00%

Dividend Restrictions

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be dependent upon dividends from the Bank to provide funds for the payment of dividends to shareholders and to provide for other cash requirements. Banking regulations may limit the amount of dividends that may be paid. Approval by regulatory authorities is required if the effect of dividends declared would cause the regulatory capital of the Bank to fall below specified minimum levels. Approval is also required if dividends declared exceed the net profits for that year combined with the retained net profits for the preceding two years.