XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.22.1
Commitments and Contingencies
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments and Contingencies
Note 9 – Commitments and Contingencies

Employment Matters


           The Company has entered into employment agreements with each of its executive officers. The employment agreements generally provide for, among other things, salary, bonus and severance payments. The employment agreements generally provide for between 12 months and 24 months of severance benefits to be paid to an executive (as well as certain potential bonus, COBRA and equity award benefits), subject to the effectiveness of a general release of claims, if the executive terminates his or her employment for good reason or if the Company terminates the executive’s employment without cause.  Such severance payments may be provided 90 days prior to and for as long as 24 months following the effective date of a change in control.  The continued provision of severance benefits is conditioned on each executive’s compliance with the terms of the Company’s confidentiality and invention and assignment agreement as well as his or her release of claims.

Rent


For month-to-month arrangements not impacted by the adoption of ASC 842, rent for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, rent was $55,500 and $36,017 respectively.


Legal Proceedings


On July 23, 2021, David R. Rosener, a purported stockholder of the Company, filed a putative class action and shareholder derivative complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (C.A. No. 2021-0644 JRS) against the Company and all of its directors and certain of its executive officers. The plaintiff named all current directors of PDS as defendants as well as PDS’s Chief Scientific Officer and PDS’s Chief Medical Officer and also named PDS as a nominal defendant. The plaintiff claimed PDS’s bylaws required tabulation of broker non-votes on Proposal 3 at the Company’s 2021 annual stockholder meeting held on June 17, 2021 (the “2021 Annual Meeting”), which sought shareholder approval of the Second Amended and Restated PDS Biotechnology Corporation 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Restated Plan”). The complaint asserted claims for breach of fiduciary duties, declaratory judgment, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment in connection with the Restated Plan and the granting of an aggregate of 1,040,700 stock options to certain executive officers pursuant to the Restated Plan.  The plaintiff sought unspecified monetary damages, to have the Restated Plan declared void, and recission of the grant of stock options as ultra vires. At the Special Meeting of Stockholders held on January 19, 2022, the requisite stockholders of the Company voted to ratify the prior approval of the Restated Plan which was adopted at the 2021 Annual Meeting and the stock options issued under the Restated Plan. Thereafter, on February 22, 2022, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.


On or about December 27, 2021, Seth Van Voorhees, the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, filed a Demand for Arbitration against the Company with the American Arbitration Association, asserting that he was wrongfully terminated. In his demand, Dr. Van Voorhees contends that his alleged damages are expected to be no less than $3,000,000, plus interest, arbitration costs, attorneys’ fees and punitive damages. The Company denies all alleged wrongful conduct and the Company is vigorously defending the matter.


While there can be no assurances as to the ultimate outcome of any legal proceeding or other loss contingency involving the Company, management does not believe any pending matter will be resolved in a manner that would have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  The Company may be involved, from time to time, in additional legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of its business. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes are not predictable with assurance.